« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Romney: Obama’s reckless spending fans a ‘prairie fire of debt’

Speaking in Des Moines, Iowa this afternoon, Romney took President Obama to task for his incessant spending and borrowing:

“Today America faces a financial crisis of debt and spending that threatens what it means to be an American. Here in the heartland you know in your hearts that it’s wrong.  We can’t spend another four years talking about solving a problem that we only make worse every day. When the men and women who settled the Iowa prairie saw a fire in the distance, they didn’t look around for someone else to save them or go back to sleep hoping the wind might blow another direction. They knew their fate was in their hands and so it is today.  A prairie fire of debt is sweeping across Iowa and our nation and every day we fail to act we feed that fire with our own lack of resolve.”

Romney went on to hit Obama for the so-called stimulus, the ever unpopular ObamaCare and the more than five trillion dollars the Obama deficits have added to the national debt:

“President Obama started his days in office with the trillion-dollar stimulus package – the biggest, most careless one-time expenditure by the federal government in history.  And remember this: the stimulus wasn’t just wasted – it was borrowed and wasted.  We still owe the money, we’re still paying interest on it, and it’ll be that way long after this presidency ends in January.

Then there was Obamacare.  Even now nobody knows the exact cost of that new program.  And that uncertainty has done great harm to our economy.  Employers aren’t hiring, entrepreneurs are worried, all because of a massive, European-style entitlement that Americans didn’t want and can’t afford.

Through his own decisions, this President has added more than five trillion dollars to the national debt, which now stands at 15.7 trillion dollars.”

Then Romney promised to lead us out of this debt and spending crisis:

“As president, I will approach debt and spending differently.  My time spent building businesses and leading state government taught me that we need to hold every department and agency to a simple test: If something can be done better and more efficiently outside the federal government, then that’s where it belongs.  Wherever we have the option of returning functions back to the states, to local governments, or, better still, to the private sector, that’s what we will do.  We will make the federal government simpler, smaller, smarter – and, by the way, more in keeping with the vision of the Framers of our Constitution.”

The excerpts are from Mitt Romney’s speech as prepared for delivery.  The excerpts are from Mitt Romney’s speech as prepared for delivery. The entire transcript is available here.

Last month the Romney campaign released a video highlighting President Obama’s broken promises on spending, deficits and the national debt. You can watch the “Broken Promises: Spending” video here.

Today the national debt is 15,674,182,767,474.36 or $15.7 trillion, it was when President Obama took office it was $10,626,877,048,913.08 or $10.6 trillion.

In 2004, when the deficit was $413 billion and the national debt was $7,419,244,676,835.15 or $7.4 trillion, Obama said the “monstrous federal deficit” was an “enormous problem.” On July 3, 2008, presidential candidate Obama said that adding $4 trillion in debt was “irresponsible” and “unpatriotic.” Nevertheless, President Obama added more than $5 trillion to the national debt in three years.

President Obama has promised to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first time at least five times:

  1. February 23, 2009: Obama Pledges to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term in office.
  2. February 24, 2009: Obama pledges to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term in office.
  3. May 26, 2009: Obama pledges to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term in office
  4. December 8, 2009: Obama pledges to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term in office.
  5. February 14, 2011: Obama pledges to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term in office.

Despite those promises Obama has racked up the largest deficits in U.S. history:

 

You shouldn’t be shocked by Obama’s failure to reduce the deficit in half by the end of his first term in office. He did warn us there would be “trillion-dollar deficits for years to come.”

COMMENTS

  • acat

    Bill Ayres chose the same ones…

    (note – parts of zombietime are NOT safe for work …this link is safe, but nauseating)

    I like Romney hitting Obama on deficits, but I love the subtle shiv he included.

    Mew

  • commondream

    what Romney’s clear plan for this is. The clearest point I’ve seen him make is that he’ll cut social security for the folks who make enough in retirement already, but it doesn’t seem like that will solve the deficit problem, and we need the deficit to turn into a surplus to pay off the national debt. Has Romney clearly documented where those spending cuts are coming from beyond his calls for no more social security payments to the socially secure?

    Somewhat unrelated side question: Does everyone think Obama came into office secretly planning to increase the national debt by $5 trillion (or who knows, maybe more), or was it more just a matter of failed policy?

    • macphisto96

      Romney and his team probably won’t get into all the specifics until they’re in office because they don’t know them.

      As a consultant at Bain, Romney analyzed how the companies he fixed functioned and found efficiencies, trimmed waste, etc. But he won’t have all the details until he’s in office and, quite frankly, right now his focus is on winning an election. He’ll probably provide a few more ideas as we go along, but the real would will start after election day when he wins and builds his transition team.

      With Social Security, his plan has involved capping payments on the top end, moving the retirement age, and changing the index that it gets adjusted for inflation against.

      As for Obama, I have a feeling that he probably felt his policies would spur the economy because I think he sees no difference between spending in the private sector versus public sector spending.

      • General_Confusion

        When businesses are in trouble managers look for ways to save the business and by extension their jobs.

        In government managers are use to subterfuge because it will save jobs as the government will never close. My observation has been whenever an agency is faced with cuts essential services are cut first so that funding is restored.