« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama continues negative campaign – tries to trash Governor Romney

Having seen Mitt Romney, build a lead among the critical Independent voters and veterans, close the gender gap and improve his favorable ratings while the recently restarted Obama reelection campaign stumbles badly out of the gate. And as hid campaign suffers from the Democrats’ Bain mutiny and a campaign spokesman who bears false witness, Obama decides to continue his negative feedback loop by attempting to trash Romney’s gubernatorial record.

That now seems to be the Obamacrats standard operating procedure. The first thing they do is go negative and try to demonize their opponents rather than stand on their record.

Yesterday, Obama’s chief reelection campaign strategist, David Axelrod issued a five-page memo on Wednesday attacking Romney’s record on jobs, taxes, fiscal responsibility as governor of Massachusetts. All of the featured speakers are Democrats even though the video does not identify their party affiliations. Today the Obama campaign released a new four minute video and sent Axelrod to Boston to coordinate a press conference to try to build momentum for the desperate effort to demonize Romney.

Romney campaign spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg responded to Obama’s Romney demonization effort:

“President Obama’s campaign is willing to say anything to cover up for the President’s years of broken promises and job-destroying policies. President Obama would love to have Mitt Romney’s record of job creation and economic growth. Instead, he’s stuck defending an unemployment rate that has failed to meet his own goal of 6% and an economy that’s stuck in neutral. If President Obama had even half of Mitt Romney’s record on jobs and the economy, he’d be running on it.”

The Romney Campaign also offered this comparison of Governor Romney’s record to that of President Obama:

UNEMPLOYMENT

Romney’s Record:

Massachusetts’ Unemployment Rate Fell From 5.6% To 4.7% During The Romney Administration. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5/30/12).

Obama’s Record:

President Obama’s Advisors Predicted The Stimulus Would Lower Unemployment To 6% Today – But It Remains Above 8%. (Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, “The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,” 1/9/09)

JOB CREATION

Romney’s Record:

Massachusetts Added Tens Of Thousands Of Net New Jobs During The Romney Administration. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, 5/30/12)

Obama’s Record:

Under President Obama, The Nation Has Lost 572,000 Jobs. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, 5/30/12)

ECONOMIC GROWTH

Romney’s Record:

Boston Business Journal, January 2007: “Thousands Of People Are Re-Entering Massachusetts’ Work Force As Its Jobs Engine … Continues To Gain Traction.” (Boston Business Journal, 1/1/07)

Obama’s Record:

Los Angeles Times: “GDP: U.S. Economy Expands At Lackluster 2.2% Rate In 1st Quarter” (Los Angeles Times, 4/27/12)

BUDGET

Romney’s Record:

Governor Romney Closed A Nearly $3 Billion Shortfall Without Raising Taxes And Balanced Four Budgets.  (Pam Belluck, “Romney Candidacy Puts Massachusetts Economy In Spotlight,” The New York Times, 3/16/07)

Obama’s Record:

President Obama Has Projected The “Fourth Straight Year Of Deficits Over $1 Trillion.” (“Highlights Of Obama’s $3.8 Trillion Budget,” The Associated Press, 2/14/12)

FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY

Romney’s Record:

Governor Romney Left More Than $2 Billion In The State’s Rainy Day Fund.  (Editorial, “Vote For Romney On Saturday,” Charleston Post & Courier, 1/20/12)

Obama’s Record:

By The End Of His Term In Office, President Obama Will Nearly Double The Nation’s Debt Held By The Public. (Eric Stirgus, “Obama Setting Debt Record, Georgia GOP Says,” PolitiFact.com, 2/1/12)

There does seem to be at least some desperation to this second line of negative Obama attacks on Romney. As Michael Barone noted this morning “Axelrod is endeavoring not to panic.” That sounds a bit desperate.

It must be hard for Axelrod not to panic. Polls show the Obama attacks against Romney’s private equity experience at Bain Capital are not hurting Romney, but the attacks have caused much dissension among Obamacrats. This morning we learned that Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick joined the Democrats’ Bain mutiny. Appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” Patrick called Bain “a perfectly fine company.” You can watch video of Patrick’s comments here.

There is more to cause team Obama concern. Last night on Fox News’ Special Report, Ed Henry reported that “top advisors to the President privately admit they are bracing for…the monthly jobs report for May.” According to Henry, that is an indication that Friday’s job report will be bad news.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • julianusrex

    n/t

    • spinoneone

      to the election. Unfortunately, no matter what happens in November, 0 will be in the White House until noon, January 20, 2013; the Dems will be in control of the Senate until noon, January 3, 2013. Who knows what mischief they can do between November 6 and January 3/20.

      • renny

        Walker is ahead in the polls but supposedly busloads of union goons are being funneled into WI by the hour from NY and NJ, so do not forget money is needed in WI and we do not want to lose there.

        • soljerblue

          The U-goons aren’t the only ones heading to WI. I have no numbers, but Tea Party volunteers from all over are on their way there also, or already there — ready to go door to door, make calls, field questions, whatever is needed. Our chapter alone sent five people as volunteers for Americans For Prosperity. A couple of other active chapters here in Alabama have also sent people. Maybe we don’t have the purple shirts, the red shirts, the clubs, the signs, the curse words and the mob mentality, but we ain’t sitting on our hands!

  • Tbone

    a devastating campaign against the Obama nonsense. Every day I watch the Romney campaign makes me appreciate more fully what a complete failure McCain’s campaign was.

    • WA_Cowboy

      I may not agree with Romney’s positions on things, but he is ready for every Obama attack and always responds with something that puts to bed whatever the attack was. I know there’s 5 months yet, but the Mittster seems to be running a good campaign — unlike McCain

  • JimmyGee

    Time to update the ole’ resume…

    • JimmyGee

      • JimmyGee

        David “I don’t think we’re in 2008 anymore” Axelrod went to the Mass. capital to slam Mitt Romney. He got heckled….

        Where was Mitt? At the empty carcass that once was, wait for it, Solyndra! Like I have said, I am not a fan of Romney, but the boy knows how to fight!!

        • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

          Wondering if the owner of the hand regrets not having grabbed the mike herself to utter a few choice words that Axelrod couldn’t get out.

  • lineholder

    You know, Mitt Romney isn’t one of my favorite people…but I have to give the man credit where credit is due on this one.

    He pulled one over on the Obama campaign, arranged for a press conference outside of Solyndra, (yes, the MSM covered it) and provided a fairly decent explanation of the Obama admin’s efforts at “crony capitalism”, (otherwise known as wasting taxpayer funds)….

    It was well done indeed. Hope he keeps this up!

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/mitt-romney-visits-solyndra-amid-attack-on-obama-jobs-record/

    • zachv

      I’ve felt that it’s been an outright injustice that as a whole we had been so preoccupied by the Republican nomination that Solyndra basically flew under the radar for most of the country. Let’s make it an issue this fall.

      • lineholder

        and time alone will tell on that point…he’s setting up a comparison between himself and Obama, i.e. that Romney knows more about how economy works than Obama does, and Romney would be a much better choice in implementing the kinds of policies that would generate jobs than Obama has been or will ever be.

        IF that’s what Romney’s striving for…it’s a good approach to take. It really is.

        • zachv

          If Obama comes down to attacking Romney for being a capitalist, for being rich and successful — It actually backs up Romney’s argument that he understands the economy better and knows how to generate jobs.

          Obama’s main argument would be completely neutered and even has the potential of helping Romney if Obama is sloppy in the wording of his attack.

          • lineholder

            Amongst a few other things.

            Plus, it is a chance to draw attention to the corruption of the Obama admin, in a generalized sort of way, without being inflammatory about it or triggering the “rrraaaccciiiissssttt” claim

    • gekster

      It is chrystal clear,
      Romney is no McCain.

      • garfieldjl

        Romney has one advantage that McCain didn’t have in 2008, Obama now has a record from while he’s been President from 2009 to currently. McCain didn’t have a lot of stuff that he could throw at Obama that not even the most gullable of the people that voted for Obama in 08 would believe to be nothing more than a smear.

        Obama has a record, in all honesty if McCain/Palin was running this time around against Obama/Biden, we would see McCain win in a landslide to the level of Ronald Reagan against Jimmy Carter (not saying McCain is anywhere near Ronald Reagan’s calibur, it is more due to the fact that Obama is actually a worse President than Jimmy Carter).

        • acat

          but there is no way he was going to be “Reaganesque”.

          Don’t kid yourself, kid.

          Romney really Really *REALLY* wants this. Do I think he’s the best candidate we could have picked? No .. but I think he’s going to be willing to hit Obama where the left lives.

          For McCain, it seemed like he was going through the motions, but not really fighting…. short of the Palin convention speech, where were *any* hits at Obama’s disturbingly thin resume, or discussion of his “kooky” friends and mentors, etc. etc. ?

          No. We must be honest, Garfield. Romney fights.

          Mew

          • garfieldjl

            You’d realize I was pointing out that Obama is worse than Jimmy Carter, which is why McCain could probably clobber Obama like Reagan did to Carter. Not saying McCain is that good, I’m saying Obama is so bad that would be the result.

          • PowerToThePeople

            in 2008 had he not be so miserable at running a campaign. He thought he was entitled to the position, thought he was a household name which would translate into votes, and he took the campaign too lightly which allowed the worst president to date to win.

            There is nothing to show that should he have ran and won this time that the results would have been any different.

            Like Romney or not, and I do not care for him, Romney knows how to fight and he will win or go down swinging. He is fighting to be president which is something McCain failed to do. Obama’s abysmal record would not be enough for McCain to trot to win nor would it be the thing that allow Romney to coast to a win. There are way too many squishes, idiots, flip floppers, and “I vote for the person who I last saw on TV” for us to put up anyone else other than a fighter.

          • acat

            His 2008 “campaign” would lose 2012.

            Period.

            Mew

          • garfieldjl

            I think he’d have better advisors this time around for starters, and second of all McCain could use Obama’s actual record as President against Obama.

            If you think McCain would not think of Fast & Furious as a legitimate criticism of Obama for instance, I think you’re underestimating McCain.

            One of McCain’s pet peeves has always been government corruption, there has been so many blatent examples of corruption by Obama and the Democrats, that I seriously doubt McCain wouldn’t go after Obama on those issues with a vengence.

            Other thing is that there is really nothing new Obama can throw at McCain because McCain is surprising clean for a politician. What are they going to do, fire off another phony sex scandal like the one that ended up with the New York Times getting sued by the woman they claimed had an affair with McCain.

            McCain didn’t run the best campaign in 08, but let’s get real, Obama’s record is so bad that he makes Jimmy Carter look good. McCain’s 08 campaign was competitent enough to pull off an easy victory in 2012′s political environment.

          • PowerToThePeople

            in his short term in politics as he does as president, McCain did not use it. So why would he now?

            As to the adviser part, he chooses his advisers, many still remain with him, so again, what is there to show this time would be any different. But even if it was, he is the one who is ultimately responsible for his campaign and for approving the tactics used, so he, not his advisers, are to blame for his sorry campaign.

            As to the gentleman claim, if you say so. He sure knew how to get down and dirty in his Arizona campaigns. But for sake of argument, lets say he became a gentleman after he beat his Republican opponents just in time to face Obama, again, his fault. So has he now flip flopped back to his pre-gentleman days?

            You are right, Obama’s record is horrible and yet he still has over 45% support. There is no room for a non fighter or anyone who thinks Obama’s record is the only thing it will take to win.Just because McCain would dwell on certain Obama issue such as Fast and Furious, which by the way is no where near as important to the average voter as the many other things in Obama’s tenure, does not mean he will attack when attacking is needed and do enough to beat Obama.

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            One thing you have to give McCain though is in the choir of folks inside and out of his campaign who blame Sarah Palin for that embarassing loss in 2008, McCain has never been one of them. As vitol as it has gotten between Sarah and Schmidt/Wallace, she did endorse McCain and campaigned for him 2010.

          • acat

            President McCain would be running for his second term.

            And yes, John McCain – to my knowledge – has not taken part in the Palin beat-down.

            Mew

        • gekster

          if he wanted to.
          A record of playing the middle, if not actually doing nothing during his tenure in the IL senate.
          A record of not taking a stand on anything, except infantacide, which McCain could have used, but didn’t.
          McCain was so scared of being labeled a racists that he didn’t dare say anything negative about Obama, and even went to the point of stating that “Obama would make a good President.
          The race was McCains to lose, and he did.

        • poppog

          McCain is a closet DemonRat.

          He is so busy bowing and scraping to the liberals to ‘get along’ he doesn’t realize that they don’t have America’s best interest in mind.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Mitt answers the attacks with the truth…”when I was Governor of Massachusetts the unemployment rate was 4.7% and we went from a budget deficit to a budget surplus. If the President could say the same, he’d be talking about his record as President instead of my record in Massachusetts.”

    • macphisto96

      And I think O and his minions are trying to distract from the jobs report.

      I’ve been a Romney supporter and voted for him here in FL, but I understand those who did not want to support him. However, I think we all can see that Romney and his team are pros thus far. Bill Richardson did an interview recently where he praised Romney’s rapid response team – and for good reason.

      Profiles of O’s re-election campaign from January indicate that O’s team saw Romney as a joke and thought this would be a walk for them. But it’s pretty clear that Romney is in it to win it.

      Frankly, I’ve not seen a campaign run this well this early before. Getting supporters out to heckle Axelrod while Romney’s out at Solyndra is absolute genius. The Romney buses that circle around O campaign events and the prebuttals he does with local media keep him on his opponents’ mind. Then there’s knowing where the campaign needs to attack. They seized on the Hillary Rosen comments in a nice, subtle way and turned it into a media circus. They subtly references Obama’s experience eating dogs and let the media turn it into a circus to deflate any criticisms concerning Mitt’s dog transporter from 30 years ago.

      I think Mitt and his team did a real analysis of his weaknesses and worked to find where he could be attacked – and got prepared. And each time O has tried to hit him, O’s guys have gotten caught flat footed.

      I also loved Romney coming out and repudiating the repudiations, letting O know that he was not going to play like McCain did.

      I think Romney’s a shark and he smells the blood in the water. I just hope he is as good as President as I think he will be. I know many will disagree – and I think they would have disagreed about Reagan too when he was running – but I think Romney will surprise many conservatives.

      But my greatest hope is that Romney has another turnaround in him – the biggest of his career. One more deficit into surplus. Because if Mitt is the one who leads us back to the right path then we will remember him as we remember Reagan.

      I believed back in 2008 that Romney had the qualities to be that kind of leader. We give him a good GOP Congress and we will see transformation, especially in entitlements because they can be tackled with a simple majority in the Senate IMHO.

      But one thing is a definite – Romney >>>>>> Obama. We’re already seeing that. Obama and his campaign are the ones that look like amateurs right now while Romney and his guys look like the pros.

  • gazill

    this without kid gloves. and not playing into the Obama campaign’s hands. What I would still like to see is when describing unemployment, state that not long ago, unemployment was at over 10%, and add for how long above 10, above 9, etc. Remind people how bad it was, and then show how the 8% actually is a result of millions dropped out of the work force. Outside of areas like the Bay Area here, I would assume that folks would be more rational and start to see O for what he is.

  • renny

    for fear of the “racism” canard. It is hard to imagine how much o really has done for race relations in 3 1/2 years: now no one on the right fears the left yelling “racism” any more.

    • acat

  • DVPTEXFLA

    I have been impressed on how Mr. Romney counter punches. He is letting Mr. Obama start the attacks, letting Obama be seen doing the attacking, and then effectively counter punching.

    As the MSM storyline, that Mr. Obama a nice guy and, well liked continues to fade, all that is left is Obama’s record.

    • macphisto96

      Make O be the bad guy. Take away the one thing he has going for him – his likeability rating. If he keeps on attacking, a lot of people that like him won’t be willing to hold their nose and vote for him.

    • mikeymike143

      romney is clearly the better choice for our country.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    While the Obama administration trotted out a video of Massachusetts Democrats telling #ObamaLies about Romney’s record off of teleprompters, another Massachusetts Democrat, this time the Governor of Massachusetts, Duval Patrick, forgot his cue cards and then forgot which #ObamaLies tall tale he was supposed to tell today and went off message. Add Duval Patrick to list of Ed Rendell, Steve Rattner, Corey Booker, Hiliary Rosen et al, #ObamaSurrogates who forgot the #ObamaLieOfTheDay or more accurately found they couldn’t utter it with a straight face.

    • acat

      This isn’t stumbling out of the gate. This is blowing an engine and corkscrewing down the dragstrip.

      Mew

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        I just wonder how long it will be before we see Patrick’s hostage video up on You Tube?

      • gekster

        • acat

          And ya know what they call that? “Driver error”.

          Mew

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            Bill Clinton has gone rogue on Bain calling Romney’s record sterling. Axelrod must be pulling the rest of his hair out this morning. I mean if he can’t depend on Bill Clinton to hold his nose and tell the #ObamaLieOfTheDay, who will? The old car isn’t only corkscrewing down the track, she is flinging off sheet metal and parts, #ObamaSupporters are running for the hills to keep from getting killed by the carnage.

  • aesthete

    Obama and his campaign staff during ’08 weren’t good, they were lucky. They waltzed in during the most incompetent and unpopular Republican administration this side of Gerald Ford, and on the most incompetent and insipid campaigner this side of Mondale, during a time when an unpopular war was on the docket. He also got lots of bonus points for being black.

    He’s still black, but he’s shown himself to be the most incompetent and abjectly terrible Democrat since JFK. He and his campaign staff have also been ridiculously tin-eared about what voters want, and are transparently contemptuous of anyone who doesn’t rhetorically fellate Obama and his “accomplishments”. Oh yeah, he also passed the most unpopular and sweeping piece of domestic legislation in a good long while, and he’s pushing it like Coca-Cola pushed New Coke. No matter how many cool black guys, Hollywood types, and academics dress it up, people aren’t buying that turd…

    Which is why Obama is throwing everything *but* Romney’s record in the voters’ faces. Romney is a steaming pile (as far as candidates go; I’m sure he’s a nice fella), but his record *is* better than Obama’s, and focusing on records forces Obama to talk about the most unpopular part of his Presidency: things he’s done while in office. Romney doesn’t have to be good to win — he can get away with being not-Obama, which is exactly what he’s doing.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    No one looks tall from the bottom of a pit of despair and failure…

  • renl57

    Evidently, Obama believes that the November election will be razor close, with the final outcome dependent on which party can do a better job of turnout.

    All this anti-Bain and “War on Women” and related stupidity from Obama isn’t intended to win over independent voters. It’s intended to enrage and fire up the liberal base of the Dem Party, to get them to turn out in huge numbers in the election.

    That could actually work, if liberals are more enthusiastic about keeping Romney out of the White House than conservatives are about electing Romney to the White House.

    Romney was not the favorite choice of many GOP base conservatives. But if they let that keep them from being enthused about getting Obama out of the White House, that could be decisive.

    • acat

      Obama cannot win by “firing up the base”. He needs to convince the mushy middle that he’s the one who can turn it around.

      The other little problem for Team Choom is that their “base” – college students, young adults, etc. – are facing a much less happy fun world than the 2008 batch did ..

      I don’t see it working, even if it is what you think it is.

      Mew

      • renl57

        …if the Dem base is fired up but the GOP base is not.

        The “mushy middle,” as you put it, have to be reached. And that means lots of GOP base volunteers are needed to call them, get them to the polls, etc.

        For decades, I watched the AFL-CIO’s Committee on Political Education (COPE) deliver election after election to the Dems just that way.

        Then the evangelicals started doing a lot of the hard work for the GOP.

        Let’s hope they do that again this year.

    • davesinsanantonio

      NOT to have a close race and then work on turnout. It is to make it appear that the race is close enough so that the fraudulent voting and the more fraudulent counting can steal the election without too much uproar from the people.

  • cactusjack

    more of a John Paul Jones than the Walter Mitty so many feared. So far his camp[aign team has been rapid in response and on message. I can only wonder and hope and pray they are ready for the other part of Obama’s one-two punch (the “one” not doing so well thus far) ; the ballot box stuffing, dead people and 1992 Dallas Cowboys front line getting on the roll and voting, the busloads of Dems suddenly showing up and voting and intimidating the precinct workers if they challenge them, the delay or challenge of military votes coming in from overseas – in sum the “Florida 2000, squared” crap that the Dems are going to pull out for Nov 2012. I know Romney is a good organizer he had better be organizing right now for the Dem’s muscle on the streets Steal of the Century they’ll be trying to pull off in FL, OH, PA, MO and all large cities in those states. “Just because Obama is going to lose, doesnt mean he cant win!” Teams of lawyers and watchers will be needed. Experts in each state’s voting laws. 2000 Florida was a minute man-like , last minute reaction the Repubs just barely pulled off, until Jim Baker and batteries of lawyers descended on FL and started blocking or challenging all the Dem sneaky Pete.

  • bk

    He calls Romney a “drive-by” governor with a lousy record in MA but helpfully notes that the MA legislature overrode 800 of his vetoes. So it appears that any bill more controversial than naming another public facility after a member of the Kennedy family was done by the legislature with no help from Romney. So WHOSE record sucked in MA??

    Oh and if Romney was a drive-by governor, what was Obama? As we’d say at work, he just kept lining up to get his ticket punched so he could jump to the next job.

    • davesinsanantonio

      Or, maybe a “slither-by” community organizer?

  • salemst

    Erick,

    I live in Massachusetts–was here during both Romney and Dukakis’ governance. Couple of quick points on Romney’s.

    Massachusetts, since its explosion on the scene in the early 1980′s, has been a huge high tech mecca. When the NASDAQ crashed in March 2000 signaling the end of the dotcom/Internet bubble Massachusetts got hit hard with job and revenue loss. That’s the environment Romney inherited January 2003. The fact we did as well as we did during his governance is a credit to him. he had an 85% majority Democrat Massachusetts legislature from 2003-2005, and a 90% Democrat majority from 2005-2007. Needing 16 in the House to sustain his veto, he had only 15 GOP members from 2005-2007.

    Jobs. We both know government can’t create private sector jobs. There’ll always be some jobs created. Where government helps is in creating an economic environment conducive to private sector jobs creation by reducing the cost of doing business here to the point of making it in business’ best financial interests to create jobs locally. All government’s supposed to do is create the right jobs creating climate, no one can control the jobs results. Mitt Romney did that, and to the best of his ability given his above mentioned political landscape.

    Just my five cents……

    • salemst

      Sorry, meant to address my above post to Dan, not Erick.

  • ihateliberals

    He is accoplishing his goals though and he wants to second term to make sure tht this Nation gets the Change that he promised. The problem is that during the 2008 campaign no one asked him what his real idea of change was and he only told lies about it during the campaign. The Democrats have Never in my 65 years had a Positive Campaign. When the truth gets out about Democrats they lose elections so they do everything possible to distort the truth and distract the electorate. What possibly could a Progressive Liberal Democrat run on? Nothing that is true about them would get them elected.

  • soljerblue

    (with apologies to Dorothy)

    Mr. President — I don’t think we’re in Chicago anymore.

  • westcoastpatriette

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/31/conservative-bloggers-say-theyre-being-harassed-for-postings/?vgnextrefresh=1

    • acat

      but it is good that the story is getting out there.

      Mew

      • westcoastpatriette

        it is getting the exposure.

        • acat

          about how to say “Yay!” to something so .. awful..

          Mew

          • westcoastpatriette

            nosay

  • Pingback: weiterlesen