« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama really does believe ‘the private sector is doing fine’

President Obama is trying to fight back against the hue and cry raised over his saying the private sector is doing fine.

Saying the private sector is doing fine may have been a blunder, but it wasn’t a gaffe. It may have been a revelation to some, to others it was a confirmation.

Mitt Romney quickly pounced on Obama’s tone deaf statement calling it an “extraordinary miscalculation and misunderstanding by a President who is out of touch.”:

“Now this morning, the President had a press conference. I don’t know if you heard it, but he called a press conference and pulled people in and said a number of things, and one of the most interesting things he said was this: he said the private sector is doing fine. He said the private sector is doing fine. Is he really that out of touch? I think he’s defining what it means to be detached and out of touch with the American people. Has there ever been an American president who is so far from reality as to believe in an America where 23 million Americans are out of work, or stopped looking for work, or can only find part-time jobs and need full-time jobs, where the economy grew in the first quarter of the year at only 1.9 percent, where the median income in America has dropped by 10% over the last four years, where there have been record number of home foreclosures, for the President of the United States to stand up and say the private sector is doing fine is going to go down in history. It’s an extraordinary miscalculation and misunderstanding by a President who is out of touch, and we’re going to take back this country and get America working again.”

The Romney campaign quickly launched a @ObamaDoingFine parody Twitter site. The RNC put up a YouTube video titled “Doing Fine,” showing headlines highlighting the lousy economy, Obama saying “the private sector is doing fine,” and asking how can President Obama fix our economy if he doesn’t understand what’s broken?

Other Republicans joined in.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker told The Weekly Standard that Obama’s comments reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of the economy:

“There are two very different views in the country,” Walker said. “The current administration seems to think that success is measured by how many people are dependent on the government. I think success is measured by how many are not.”

Speaking at the regional Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Chicago, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie called Obama’s statement an outrage:

“It is an outrage to have the president of the United States stand up and say to hardworking governors, to Republicans and Democrats around this country that state and local government hiring is moving in the wrong direction and we’re to blame because the economy is not growing. He’s the one who put forward an ineffective wasteful stimulus plan that did nothing to help this economy. He’s the one who saddled us with all these federal rules and regulations that don’t allow governors to have the freedom to do what we really want and then he has the audacity to stand up this morning and say it’s the nation’s governors and the nation’s mayors who are driving our economy down by not hiring enough people for government work. If you need to understand with anymore clarity the difference between conservative Republican principles and this president, you don’t need to listen to one more word in this campaign than what he said behind that podium at the White House today.”
After less than five hours, Obama attempted to clarify his the private sector is doing fine statement by saying it’s absolutely clear the economy is not doing fine:

“It’s absolutely clear the economy is not doing fine. That’s the reason I had a press conference. That’s why I spent yesterday, the day before yesterday, this past week, this past month and this past year talking about how we can make the economy stronger.

“The economy is not doing fine. There are too many people out of work. The housing market is still weak, too many homes underwater and that’s precisely why I asked Congress to start taking some steps that can make a difference.” – President Barack Obama, Remarks after bilateral meeting with President Aquino of the Philippines, White House, June 8, 2012.

Confused? Don’t be. Saying it’s clear the economy is not doing fine is not a retraction of the private sector is doing fine. It doesn’t mean Obama doesn’t believe the private sector is doing fine. To the contrary, both statements support Romney’s observation that Obama seeks a government-centered society. Romney laid out the Romney’s private equity vs. Obama’s public equity comparison in his “Obama’s Government-Centered Society” speech after sweeping the primaries in Wisconsin, Maryland and Washington, D.C.:

“The president has pledged to transform America. And he’s spent the last four years laying the foundation for a new government-centered society. I will spend the next four years rebuilding the foundation of an opportunity society led by free people and free enterprises.”

Today Obama’s so-called truth team is out with another misleading ad, still trying to distance Obama from his the private sector is doing fine statement. The “Romney Economics: Fewer Teachers, Fewer Firefighters, Fewer Police Officers” ad implies that Romney wants fewer firemen, policemen and teachers. That is not what Romney said. Romney pointed out that Obama says we more firemen, policemen and teachers, then asked whether Obama got the message from the rejection of the Obamacrats attempt to recall Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker:

“And his answer for economic vitality, by the way, was, of course, pushing aside the private sector, which he said is doing fine.  Instead, he wants to add more to government. He wants another stimulus.  He wants to hire more government workers.  He says we need more firemen, more policemen, more teachers: did he not get the message in Wisconsin? The American people did.  It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.” (Gov. Mitt Romney, Remarks, Council Bluffs, IA, 6/8/12).

The new ad is still more deception and distortion from Obama.

COMMENTS

  • DerKrieger

    …ought to point out to the Idiot inhabiting the Oval Office that the Federal government doesn’t hire police, firefighters, or teachers. States and localities do.

    Would be a great ad, “Obama thinks the federal government hires …. Is he really that clueless?”

    • acat

      Likely some sort of block grant program, something like Clinton’s “Community Policing” programs.

      In short, the Fed will juice the locals – short term – to grow jobs, and long term the locals will increase their tax take to keep jobs.

      Seen this story before.

      Mew

      • renl57

        I really want to see the Democratic Party Platform go on the record as saying that thanks to Obama’s policies, the private sector is doing fine. And that now the thing to do is expand government at all levels.

        Once it’s in writing in their platform, they won’t be able to walk it back. They’ll have to defend it right through the October debates and Election Day.

        • michaelbowler

          The vast majority of voters aren’t paying attention, they haven’t noticed his “private sector is doing fine” statement. Furthermore, be clear, most people who aren’t engaged, just don’t care about or digest the finer points of the philosophical arguments that so many of us routinely employ.

          When the election comes around and they start noticing some of what is said, this statement will be lost in a sea of complaints about Obama. To them the cacophony of voices, complaining about Obama, is just election politicking.

          There are so many legitimate things, including this minor one, on which to attack Obama’s leadership, none will have the impact they should/could. It really is a brilliant strategy. Obama has done so many things that are problematic, it’s impossible to devote enough time to each to properly realize the necessary impacts they each should have on voters’ opinions. It all begins to sound like sour grapes to thise who aren’t informed. It is important to remember they are not informed because it’s not a priority to them….

          Makes our job a real uphill climb.

          • renl57

            While these things might not be noticed by the public as the campaign drags on and on, the GOP can put them in the context of high unemployment and dashed hopes.

            Folks know they can’t find good jobs–or their spouses can’t–or their children can’t–or their friends can’t. That’s a reality that Obama can’t just wave away.

          • hart65

            Thoreau introduced his Walden with a statement of faith:
            “I do not propose to write an Ode to Dejection,
            but to brag as lustily as Chanticleer in the morning,
            standing on his roost, if only to wake my neighbors up.”

            Here’s to the power of relentless GOP cock-a-doodle-dos

    • loganyung

      Americans need to understand how this works. The vast majority of money for schools comes from local property taxes. That means local control of schools, which generally improves the quality of education.

      Obama, though, wants the Federal Government to collect all the Tax money, and then make the States beg for money (which will all go to the blue states with a Democrat in charge). The states would be forced to comply with whatever Federal rules that they make up, including further changes in curriculum to indoctrinate students and further cementing the teacher’s union control.

    • txdave
      Pretty easy: how is the stock market doing?

      DJIA up over 50% since Obama came to power bit over 3 years ago.

      Compare that with the bush years: bush started, DJIA 11000, ended
      8000, considerable depletion of wealth and NOT a good economy.

      Whereas the market has gone from 8000 to 12500 under Obama, a great success for the over 100 million Americans in stocks, funds, 401k, annuities, etc. No GOP admin can match that historic success.

      Republicans stand in the way in the congress of passing Obama’s jobs bill, which is why about 12 million still unemployed.

      But, the private economy doing far better than under bush or reagan/bush.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        We have a DKos troll, who is not even bothering to hide it….

  • Tbone

    He not only is inarticulate, the things he says extemporaneously are laughable in their lack of coherent thought..

    • APA Guy

      But economically, HE BELIEVES IT. He honestly believes the U.S is better when the private sector diminishes and the public sector (i.e. government jobs) thrives.

      After the stones he showed in the primaries against Gingrich, I have no doubt Romney will hammer him with this until Election Day…and it’s about time our side did!

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Since he only hangs out with the ones who can give him big bucks…

    • txdave

      ?So the fact that we were able to get prominent Republicans and businesspeople, some of whom were involved before but others who are new, helped in the effort both financially and politically.?

      This is on top of a network of wealthy gay men and women who have a history of giving money to philanthropic causes and in recent years have shifted much of their effort to same-sex marriage.

      Tim Gill, a billionaire software developer from Colorado, who is gay, has assembled a network that has been likened to a gay version of Emily?s List, which supports female candidates. Mr. Gill?s foundations have distributed over $235 million to gay-related causes, with much going to promote same-sex marriage, his advisers said.

      ?My husband and I are legally married in some states but obviously not married in others, so that?s a pretty big focus,? Mr. Gill said.

      David Bohnett, a co-founder of GeoCities and a gay philanthropist here, has donated more than $4 million over the past 10 years to candidates and organizations supporting same-sex marriage, his advisers said.

      And this week, Freedom to Marry, a group that advocates same-sex marriage, announced on Thursday a $3 million fund-raising campaign aimed at winning the five ballot initiatives and pushing the New Jersey Legislature to override the veto by Gov. Chris Christie of a same-sex bill, said Evan Wolfson, the founder of Freedom to Marry.

      The first $250,000 is coming from Chris Hughes, a founder of Facebook, and his fianc?, Sean Eldridge. ?Chris and I certainly prioritize in our contributing,? Mr. Eldridge said. ?Marriage is a top priority.?

      Mr. Brown said the same-sex-marriage cause had been greatly helped by people like Mr. Hughes. ?A couple of billionaires go a long way,? he said. But Mr. Wolfson said the ?vast majority? of donations came from small donors.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        And then absolute DNC talking points on another diary, go away DKos troll.

  • popdaddy

    Only The Moron could look at 60,000 ? 150,000 jobs reported as new jobs every week of his regime and see 380,000 ? 420,000+ new applications for unemployment claims in the same weeks then claim his regime has produced 4,000,000+ new jobs.

    Now this socialist fool wants to increase government jobs through more Federal debt while proclaiming the private sector is ?just fine?
    .
    I speak as one of the millions who caught the axe during the time it was obvious The Moron was somehow going to be elected and 2009 when he became fully responsible for the recession and decline of American values and respect.

    I?m employed now at a much lower income than I earned in the 70?s, 80?s, 90?s and the first eight years of the new 00?S. I look forward to the millions of those who have felt the various not just fine aspects of the private sector joining me watching the end of the Barrack Hussein Obama regime this November.
    I firmly believe The Silent Majority will prevail.

    • michaelbowler

      We’re not silent anymore.

      • zachv

        That’d be disastrous!

  • mikeymike143

    it very much reminds me of the reagan/carter race. and carter and obama are the two worst presidents of the modern era.

    • zachv

      Romney’s living in up right now, but Obama proves that any politician can screw it up — and easily. One slip and MSM who will be picking apart every single detail prop up their idol Obama.

      • cactusjack

        but we all must be aware he has a one two punch, and if the first punch fails him he can try the second punch, the left hook – he can instruct the bosses to turn loose the goons in the precincts and, first week of Nov 2012 start “moving” elections. The Dems are the masters of making elections go their way when they need to. So far Romney’s campaign team has been (since Memorial Day, the new starting gate) faultless in the communnications war but they had better start getting their anti-election fraud teams ready, now. Whole teams of lawyers, pollsters with computer programs, precinct watchers – better be ready to hit the ground in the close sttates come Labor Day.

        • cactusjack

          Florida 2000, and Illinois 1960 was? Everyone knows the 1960 election was stolen by the Dems in Cook County, Illinois, Duval County, Texas and West Virginia statewide. Dems will admit it today with a laugh. Republicans were always the gentlemen who, “for the good of the country” refused to challenge or file lawsuits (nixon 1960, Ford 1976 over Ohio). But in 2000 it was as if a Tea Party like spirit came over Republicans nationwide — “no mas!” “This time we’re fighting back”. and the cavalry got there in time (Cheney, Baker, and scores of election lawyers). Gore was immediatly countered and contested everytime he tried to pull something. Even with that, it still took going all the way to SCOTUS to stop the extra-legal, banana republic fraud going on in several Florida counties and the Florida Supreme Court. I still sweat a little when I think of it, they almost got away with it. Oh and predictable nauseous follow up by the Dems: “we must abolish the Electoral College.” Meaning, fellow conservatives – we must preserve the Electoral College at all costs, it is a firewall protecting the Republic from becoming anarchic, mobocratic, democracy.

    • renl57

      Compared to 1980, the percentage of white voters in the electorate is down by 15 points. (In 1980, 88% of voters were white; today only 73% of voters are white.)

      As things stand now, Obama will pick up 95% of black vote, 70% of the Hispanic vote, most of the single female vote, nearly all the public-employee vote and the gay vote.

      That has become a sizable and GROWING coalition–as a percentage of the electorate it’s MUCH bigger than in 1980.

      Reagan could not have won against these demographics. Reagan won in 1980 by taking 56% of the white vote. But today, that wouldn’t be enough to even win, let alone win a landslide.

      Romney can win. But he can’t win big. No Republican can win big anymore until they figure out how to win over Hispanic and black votes.

      • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

        Win the Presidency, take back the Senate, add to the House and in the process pick up seats with solid conservatives – see Mourdock – and pick up Governors and a couple of legislatures.

        That would be a landslide with 50.0000001% of the popular vote for Romney and +1 in the Electoral College.

        • acat

          Clinton won a couple, didn’t he? Just look at those popular vote totals…

          Mew

          p.s. in case it isn’t clear, this post was sarcastic

          • rightlane1111

            As some of you know, I am a member of a Conservative Chatboard and I also get e-mails from some of my more informed chatmembers. Thought you might like to look at these. The title of his e-mail is…Now I Am Getting Some Hope:

            Voter rolls/registrations….since 2010.

            Florida – The # of registered Democrats has fallen off. The # of Republican
            registrants has risen. No exact #s were given. The Governor has announced,
            however, that he is purging over 50,000 dead people from the roles.

            Iowa – Democrat registrants are down 29k; Republican, up by 10k

            Arizona – Dem’s down 58k; Repub’s also down but only by 9.5k

            N. Caro. – Dem’ registrants are up by 17.5k; Repubs by a whopping 49.5k

            N.Mex., Colorado and Nevada, all report that, although Dem’ registration is up,
            the Republican numbers are alot higher. No numbers were given.

            No information yet on Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Minn., Mich., but the 2010
            elections yielded great success in both the state and federal elections. Even in
            Maine we took the governorship and the chambers.

            So…Taking into account that Wisconsin was not even close and listening to ALL of my friends…nobody likes Obama…not even my financial broker.

      • Dave_A

        But we’ll never get that as long as we tolerate anti-LEGAL-immigrant demagoguery, and ‘all Hispanics are illegals’ garbage in the GOP…

        I’m not saying all or even most Republicans do that stuff… But if we’ve got one, the media makes it seem like we’ve got a million…

        That’s why Pat B. is MSNBC’s pet Republican…

        We need to advance an ‘immigration agenda’ that is in line with both our Party’s platform on law-and-order, AND our national history as a nation fairly open to legal immigration…

        The sort of folks who come here legally aren’t looking for government handouts – most leave Socialist or quasi-Socialist nations (Yes, including Mexico) to come here… They are looking for oppertunity… Many have more traditional/Chirstian values than the average Easter/Christmas-only-Christian American… They are natural allies for the GOP…

        However, when we allow our desire to contain law-breaking to override common-sense – when we start talking about building walls & going after foreign languages… Or when we describe immigration as a ‘job killer’… We offend them all…

        Most legal immigrants see illegals the same way kids see someone who skipped in the lunch-line… So there’s going to be support for reasonable enforcement measures – and we can use that to our advantage to get something done that will work…

        But we have to do it while making it clear that the US welcomes and will continue to welcome immigrants who come here legally (and making it easier to do so would help even more – since most legal immigrants DO support broader LEGAL immigration, as they know people ‘back home’ who would love to move to America too)…

        We also have to make it clear to all the economic-illiterates here, that more people means MORE jobs, not less – that by increasing the population with LEGAL, hard-working immigrants we will increase demand for goods & services, and thus improve the economy.

        • acat

          There is no such thing as a “Hispanic Bloc”.

          There’s a Cuban-American bloc, mostly in Florida.
          There’s a Mexican-American bloc, larger in the southwest but also noticeable in most urban areas. (Chicago’s Little Village neighborhood, forex)
          There’s a bloc of Colombian-Americans, Argentinian-Americans, Guatemalan-Americans .. etc. etc.

          They don’t move as one.

          Don’t expect to move a majority of all of these blocs into the GOP column just by nominating a guy from one bloc.

          Mew

          p.s. we’re arguably better suited to address Mexican-Americans by mentioning Romney’s grandparents, not Rubio’s… and by having Romney and Rubio having something like “values-conversations” (where “values” is both pocketbook-fiscal and social) en Espanol on Telemundo et al.

          • Dave_A

            The ‘blocs’ split in different directions…. And yeah, ‘identity politics’ doesn’t work very well for any groups the GOP has a chance to touch…

            My biggest concern is that with the exception of Cubans (who we consider political refugees & allow legal status to any who make it here), the majority of the ‘reachable’ groups of voters are immigrants or children of the same…

            We also have immigrants from non-American destinations as well, who’s traditional culture is more conservative (esp social-conservative) than liberal…

            That is the over-arching group (call it ‘super-bloc’) I’m looking at…

            The Democrats will always have a little bit of anti-legal-immigration bias, as their union-bloc still believes that ‘Immigrants steal American jobs’…

            If the GOP can get that out of our party (And really, none of the ’3-legs’ of conservatisim require America to be a closed nation), and make our immigration policy ‘Welcome to America – glad to have every single one of you – BTW, thanks for not breaking the law to get here’ we can lock that group in pretty well..

            It will mean giving up on any mention of a border fence… And making sure our members know that there is to be NO opposition to the H1B program…

            But doing those things will not only help our party get more of the naturalized-citizen vote… It will also allow a real dialogue on illegal immigration and how to stop it WITHOUT building a Maginot Line on the border…

            And incidentally, our sought-after naturalized voters will support (Having to show papers to get a job or do financial business, and having the IRS audit those records isn’t offensive to folks who went through ‘the process’ to get here… Walls & ‘foreign-culture-ban’ legislation, plus the demagoguery that comes from the folks who promote that stuff are)…

            As for Rubio… I like what I’ve heard about him as a politician, period – but I have no illusion that a Cuban will win-over non-Cuban voters simply because he knows more Spanish than what’s taught in 2 years of HS foreign-language…

          • acat

            I think Perry’s creation of a “Texas rangers navy” was a net positive.

            The trouble is, the border has been demagoged down to bumper-sticker sound bites for so long, it’s hard to get through to people. It’s not just immigration, it’s also national sovereignty, national security, local resource allocations .. the border impacts lots of what initially appear to be discrete issues.

            Of course, Perry accompanied the boots with a pragmatic in-state approach to illegals, trying to get them on the path to citizenship.

            Some days, I suspect the way to win this may be to treat border security as both a national security and local law enforcement priority, leaving illegals caught on this side out of the discussion until after we have actual enforcement. Heck, if we can wait a generation, there simply won’t be any more illegals….

            Mew

    • la2000

      Wake me when the Reagan part of this match up shows.

      Right now, it’s like the Special Olympics of Presidential contests.

      • acat

        You don’t have to like the nominee, but you do have to support him.

        With the right congress, i.e. enough conservatives to give the GOP some much-needed spine, Romney will do okay.

        Mew

      • APA Guy

        Disparaging the GOP candidate to replace Obama – a candidate who is providing a clear, fiscally-conservative alternative to Obama, BTW – is not acceptable here.

        We vote GOP in the general here…and we don’t snipe at him with liberal talking points/strategies. Change your tune or be reported…only warning.

      • Tbone

        You didn’t.

    • wag

      just like the economy is doing now.

  • littlehouse18

    Christie kind of danced around the edges.

  • lineholder

    The article was dated June 6, which is before Obama made his “the private sector is fine” comments….

    “More than three-quarters (88%) said they don?t feel Congress understands small-business issues, and 87% said they felt the same about the Obama administration.”

    http://smallbusiness.foxbusiness.com/legal-hr/2012/06/06/how-business-owners-will-vote-in-november/?intcmp=featuredmedia

    If this was their opinion prior to Obama’s comments, strong chance it has solidified even more after those comments were made!

    • renl57

      In the recovery we’ve been having since the bottom in 2009, big business has been doing much better than small business.

      Take a look at these charts:

      http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-says-private-sector-is-fine-see-the-charts-2012-06-08#

      Large corporations are profiting like never before.

      But small business net worth (as a percentage of GDP) has dropped sharply.

      That’s another reason why folks aren’t happy with the current recovery. They can see all the bankrupt small businesses and empty storefronts in their own neighborhoods and strip malls.

      • lineholder

        Thanks for posting the link! 6.5% profit margin with 4% cash flow? Those are miserable numbers economically. I knew that demand for products and services was low, but those numbers mean that even with offering services/products at a reduced price, turnover is sluggish at best.

        We’ve been riding along a mild-to-moderate demand-side crisis in the private sector for months on end, and I’ve been hoping (and praying) that it would go no further than that! Still am, for that matter!

        I think there’s probably more to it for small business owners than just the empty storefronts. When Obama makes comments such as “local and state governments to blame for not hiring more workers”, etc., what does that translate into for small business owners? “More taxes”. That’s what they hear. And what they know is that increases in taxes are likely to take even more expendable income out of the pockets of the individual consumers in the local community, which could have a negative influence on demand for services and goods. That’s the reality on the private sector side of business…it’s all about the supply-and-demand cycle.

        I wish Romney would draw more attention to a few trends, such as the trending pattern of having the highest number of people employed part-time that our nation has ever seen. Couple this trend with our sustained unemployment rate, and it would let him explain the drop in expendable income fairly easily. It’s just a hop, skip and jump from there to explaining why increasing taxes would do more harm than good.

        We have some states that are much closer to a severe demand-side private sector crisis than others are, and Obama is very much so in the wrong for making attacks on local and state governments who may be attempting to use enough of common sense that they do not entirely destroy the local and/or state economy.

        • lineholder

          I hadn’t really though about it until another discussion that went on during the past few days, but we have more economic theories floating around than a dog has fleas…and it simply may be necessary for the Romney team to spell out the hard cold reality the private sector is facing in black and white.

          Then, he does something like this….

          I can and do give the man credit for this much…he’s staying dead center on top of what is going on!

          • acat

            Romney is not taking for granted that it is “his turn”, “his coronation”, “his race to lose”, he is going hammer and tongs at Obama, just as he went hammer and tongs at Pawlenty, Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, Perry, etc. etc.

            I may not have wanted Romney to be the nominee, but I definitely want … make that *WANT* him to be President.

            Mew

          • lineholder

            I wasn’t expecting coming from Romney, at all, on any level. I mean…remember the “wooden Indian” type of character he often seemed to be during the primaries?

            THIS behavior on Romney’s part, exemplified in that ad…yeah, it absolutely earns my respect. And it’s likely to inspire more confidence in him coming from the general public, too.

            I’m not sure exactly how he should go about, but I really do think at this point that we have so many different viewpoint based on a wide variety of economic theories that when it comes to the dangers that we’re facing right now on the private sector side…Romney may have to get down to the point of spelling it out in detail…bit by bit and link and link…so that people understand the cause-and-effect analysis of what is going on.

          • lineholder

          • Viet71

            He should be on Romney’s payroll.

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            on David Axelrod to look in the camera and lie out of his teeth, what can he depend on? Axe just a word of advice…YOU NEVER EVER, SEND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OUT TO WHINE…it is beneath the dignity of the office. Obama’s pass the buck crying is an embarrassment. That is what you have surrogates for. Surrogates whine, the President trumpets the good news. Oh wait, those surrogates have been a little unreliable and well the good news is a little short…sorry my bad.

          • acat

            been largely responsible for creating Obama’s image in the first place.

            Mew

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            Ol’ Axe is so discombobulated, he actually uttered the Romney campaign is seizing on the “Private Sector is doing fine” as a way to avoid the jobs debate. If I were Romney, I’d say “If the President would like to have a jobs debate, any place, any time.” Oh well, when we fire the whole lot of Obamaites in November, I am sure there well always be openings at MSNBC. Any concern for Axelrod is offered w/ #sarcasm.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            I think Romney’s getting more comfortable in his skin as the nominee every day, and he’s starting to connect with voters – the base, independents, and apparently even a few Democrats (Clinton).

            I WANT him to be POTUS, too.

          • garfieldjl

            I currently think the Obama Regime is in a state of panic, so they are making all kinds of idiotic mistakes.

            It also looks like Bill Clinton is doing his best to undermine Obama, and if you read the book: “The Amateur,” it is pretty easy to understand why.

            If Obama has something on Romney I hope he releases it way too early while in a panic, so we can switch candidates at the convention, or alternatively he so mismanages the attack that it falls flat on its face.

            The way I’m looking at it, the reason the Bain Capital attack fell flat on its face is Obama has been spending the past 3 blaming everyone else, and never taking responsibility for anything that goes wrong.

          • acat

            I suspect that any “october surprise” stuff Obama thinks he has will explode in the Dems’ faces when used.

            Mew

          • gekster

            Romney is the candidate and nothing short of an act of God is going to change it;
            But you keep beating that dead horse.

            Whup, whup, whup.
            C’mon silver,
            Why won’t you get up?
            Whup, whup, whup.
            Whup, whup, whup.
            C’mon. Get up.
            Whup, whup, whup.

          • garfieldjl

            So yeah I’d give good odds that they will probably screw up their attack if they really do have something, given their current track record, that it would fall flat on its face.

            @gekster

            I’m not going to sing someone false praises, my criticism of Romney remains unchanged. The only thing Romney has going for him currently is I think Obama is significantly worse than he is.

          • acat

            He’s got the Chicago swagger and tactics, but he slipped beyond the blue-on-blue City league without playing in the red-on-blue State league because the Illinois GOP picked that year to self-destruct.

            Mew

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

            You specifically said, in a comment before Romney locked up the nomination but at a point where it obvious to everyone with a double digit IQ (so that would exclude you), that YOU had explosive information on Romney and that it would take him out of the race.

            Where is it?

            And your last two sentences will forever brand you as a troll, and not a very good one at that. Romney may not be my ideal candidate, but he’s actually got a lot going for him.

            Very success career in private business. Not only a successful career, but one where he showed he knows how to add value to undervalued assets and that he’s not shy about killing assets that are worthless or that will require more investment to resurrect that they’ll ever be worth.

            He’s been a Governor. We can quibble about his performance, but given that both the Massachusetts Senate and House had significantly more Democrats than required to override a veto, he survived pretty well. The big thing here is that he’s actually had experience at the top of the governmental food chain and hopefully, with a friendlier legislative body in the U.S. Congress he’ll actually be able to accomplish some good things.

            He’s a very aggressive campaigner, which was one of my big concerns. He’s not playing Mr. Nice Guy, he’s going for the throat and he’s doing it in a very effective manner, so effective that even the liberal press is commenting on it.

            He’s put together an excellent team. They are VERY focused, very well prepared and seem to be really close to ruthless. I would expect the same sort of hires in a Romney White House.

            Now then jerk, where’s the ugly stuff on Romney you said YOU had?

          • garfieldjl

            I don’t mind if Romney is being a jerk to Obama, quite frankly Obama more than deserves it.

            WHAT I DO MIND is how Romney treated fellow Republicans in the Primaries.

            The stuff on Bain Capital was Romney’s achilles heal, but considering how the Obama Campaign has botched their opening salvo using Bain Capital, I doubt attacks that angle are going to be particularly effective at this point.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            have gotten over it. Haven’t they all endorsed him? Perhaps it’s time for you to get over it as well.

          • acat

            I believe all the rest, and Rand Paul, have endorsed Romney.

            Shall I go find the Two Paths video again?

            Mew

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

            email counts as an endorsement. And, he hasn’t released his delegates.

          • acat

            Romney has exceeded 1144 by any possible count.

            (it’s telling that even the Paultards seem to have stopped claiming Ron is going to win enough of the remaining delegates to deny Romney his coronation.. which was funny when he needed to pick up 65% of California .. but is too pathetic even for them to say Ron needs to win 127% of the remaining…)

            Let Santorum be a petulant child. I’ll bet he’s holding out for debt repayment, or a speaking slot at GOP CON.

            Mew

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

            nw. (No woofs)

          • acat

            null

          • garfieldjl

            Like mbecker, start picking a fight with me, and the antagonism opens up old wounds so to speak all over again.

            I believe Obama to be even worse than Romney, which is why I often make that statement. However, I’m not going to behave like the Republican equivalent to the Democrat’s “Partisan Shrews” such as Keith Olberbite (yeah I misspelled Olbermann’s name deliberately). I don’t make that statement lightly, one thing that has me really concerned is that Romney supporters often go ballistic whenever someone voices a criticism of Romney, we see that kind of behavior from the Obama lemmings on the left.

            We never saw this from George W. Bush supporters (and I voted for Bush in 2004 btw), people could readily admit Bush’s flaws.

            We all know that Obama is worse than Romney, but that doesn’t mean we should start acting like Romney is the 2nd coming of Ronald Reagan either. Maybe I’m old-fashioned in the fact I don’t believe an election should be like American Idol, but I feel we should be looking at the positives and negatives of the people running for office, compare and contrast the two, and then make the decision as to who we feel is best qualified to be President.

          • gekster

            Because you missed alot in that one post alone.
            You keep posting like you get it, but you just don’t get it at all.
            I guess it’s just your MO.

            Or like I told you before, you are a moby,
            just here to disrupt.

            And like becker, I would like to see the dynamite info you claimed to have on Romney.

          • garfieldjl

            I considered Bain Capital the reason that Romney could not win the General, I never expected Obama to pull such an incompetitent attack that it has effectively immunized Romney.

            I had run across youtube interviews of people that lost their jobs due to Bain Capital, I’m quite frankly surprised Obama didn’t simply go use those (I think one of my diary entries from a few monthes ago has a link to one).

            Other problems for Romney had to do with some things that were funded when he was Governor, but it was pointed out by another individual here that many of those programs were leftovers from the previous governor.

            I still don’t like how Romney won’t renounce Romneycare, and I don’t like what all he pulled in the primaries though.

            Seriously, anyone that lives near Chicago knows how dirty their politics is. They are normally very good at smearing opponents, the fact he has been this incompetitent in his attacks on Romney is something I never expected.

          • gekster

            Grab an oar and help.
            Or get out of the way.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            or to babysit those who are still living in the primary. It’s time to man up , so to speak, and live with the scars. We’re in a war for our country, and if you can’t fight for Romney, then get out of the way of those who can and are. That may sound harsh, but your attitude is frustrating to those of us who are spending our time and money and whatever resources we have to make a difference.

            At this point, we all know Romney’s negatives, and you can bet that Obama will be emphasizing those plenty. What we must do with everything we have is paint the most optimistic picture possible of President Romney and everything he brings with it – his promises to fight to repeal Obamacare, to appoint constructionist judges, etc. (look at his website) for those who aren’t already committed to voting for the GOP nominee.

            You shouldn’t be struggling any longer with looking at the positives and negatives, and comparing and contrasting, in order decide who is best qualified to be POTUS. It’s a sign of weakness at this point, and one that the left will exploit to their advantage. They’ll point to people like you and say, “See, Romney can’t even convince conservatives or his base or garfield.” It’s Romney or Obama. Make your choice. You’re either going to fight for Romney or you’re not.

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

            Santorum probably won’t because he’s no brighter or any more mature than you are.

            It’s call “politics” and it’s a blood sport. Always has been always will be, in every jurisdiction where elections are held.

            As far as Bain Capital, you stupid jerkoff, Romney’s handled that subject quite well without regard to the Obama campaign’s performance.

            The primaries are over. Romney won. And, he very effectively got over every one of the HUGE problems you said he was going to have, no matter how many times people who actually know something about how the game is played told you that your head was in a place where your hair would get smelly. Your head is still there.

            You, garfield, are an ignorant, mouthy little punk who hasn’t even made an effort to actually learn anything since the first day you got here.

          • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

            “so we can switch candidates at the convention”

            Garfield, behind the times, eh? welcome to June … Romney won it a month ago. wake up sleepyhead!

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

            He’s an infantile idiot with no relation to the real world.

          • garfieldjl

            I hope Obama continues to make gaffes like the one in the latest Romney ad.

          • rightlane1111

            We’re all in this boat together and quite frankly…I want Obama…and his ilk…out of the boat…FOR GOOD. As decent people, we need to unite against our common foe…AND THAT IS OBAMA.

            My candidate was not the nominee. I wish he were…he isn’t. However, we all have to stay together on this. I believe in free speech. No candidate is perfect…but this guy in the WH has to go before there is not a USA anymore. And…Garfield…that is how serious it really is.

          • APA Guy

            nt

          • gekster

            We are all in the same boat together.

            But our friend garfield,who instead of helping us row,
            points over to a boat that has sunk,
            and complains we could have had that one,
            and the one we’re in might sink.
            Well, that is true of all boats. (Titanic anyone)

            We have our boat.
            It’s time to start rowing.

          • APA Guy

            Obama honestly believes that a shrinking private sector is best for America. That way, he can put the tens of millions of unemployed/underemployed to work for the government…thus enslaving them to him and his party.

            These creeps are no mystery to me or any other conservative, but they get away with their destructive ideology when we dismiss them revealing their secrets as “gaffes”.

          • garfieldjl

            So yeah it was actually a gaffe.

          • APA Guy

            …a noticeable mistake. This was no “mistake”…it was a statement revealing his core beliefs…nothing more, nothing less.

          • APA Guy

            This isn’t a misstatement in the tradition of a misunderstanding or bout of disinformation. It’s a man telling the country that paltry private-sector job growth is “just fine”.

            When hell freezes over will we allow this to pass into oblivion when far too much of the country still seems to like this guy. That will change when they have a full understanding of his beliefs..starting with this one.

          • garfieldjl

            I’m saying it is a gaffe because it wrecks Obama’s carefully crafted image and reveals the real Obama. It is a gaffe from that standpoint, because it reveals what Obama doesn’t want revealed.

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

            Because it doesn’t fit your meme.

            If it was a gaffe he would have a dozen people out defending it. Hell, he wouldn’t be defending it.

            garfield, one day in the distant future when you finally get out of diapers maybe you’ll learn a thing or two. There’s a real, live reason why you’re on the losing end of every discussion.

            Actually, there are several:

            You’re ignorant.
            You make no effort to relate to the real world.
            You also make no effort to learn from your betters.

            Go to the beach. Get a sunburn. Do anything but continue to make a damn fool of yourself here.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    an American president who is so far from reality as to believe . . .?”

    James Earl Carter comes to mind . . .

    • Lisa Bullock-Hock

      That number is going down. More people than ever don’t get up and go to work.

      • edintexas

        I tend to get a might irritated when someone confuses employment with paying income taxes. There are lots of retired people who pay income taxes, including this old curmudgeon and wife.

  • Michael Dugas

    that stands out the most is where he said in a speech that it’s Congresses fault. That Congress should put it money where its mouth is and give tax breaks to small businesses who hire more workers and pay them higher wages. Talk about putting the cart before the horse. If people aren’t out there spending, buying your products or services, no tax break on earth is going to make hiring more people at higher wages work out. Obama’s ignorance is a danger to our country and his policies ……. his policies are exact copies of those same policies failing all over Europe.

    • westcoastpatriette

      when it comes to reality and his assessment of economic problems and solutions comes from lala land. Seems incapable of comprehending basic math much less providing viable solutions to the country’s economic malaise. The left are all alike in that regard.

      • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

        no text

  • bs61

    However I will get out the vote for him over our current marxist in Cheif!

    • acat

      Liking is not required. Losing is not an option.

      Mew

      • bs61

        This former Chicago Dem finally woke up!

    • cactusjack

      team? And brining Newt into his campaign in whatever capacity he is, was a good idea. Did you think Axelrod’s falling on his face before a mixed party crowd in Boston, was an accident? Before mass media completely dominated politics, they used to call that “good ground work.”

  • rightlane1111

    n/t

    • acat

      It deserves to go viral, though …

      Mew

  • rightlane1111

    is this thing getting around. Dumb like a fox.

    • acat

      I really don’t.

      Mew

  • rightlane1111

    With all those facts in your head…oh well…going viral means that it is all over the Internet. I tried to get the site to come up..but you have it embedded. This is really good. It sure is better than anything I have seen come out of Crossroads. It’s a really good ad.

    • acat

      whether this video has achieved it.

      I’d like to think so… but I don’t sample a broad enough spectrum of web sites and meme nexii to know.

      Sorry, apparently I am unclear today.

      Mew

      • rightlane1111

        and I ask that my people forward it onto their e-mail list. If the press will not do their job…I will, in some small way, do mine. You would be surprised how these same videos get around and circulated.

        thank you. :-)

  • http://www.redstate.com/wp-admin/user/profile.php docfreeman

    Obama blames anyone but himself and his administration. He blames Congress, but it is not Congress that is the problem, it is the Democrat Senate that is ruled by Harry Reid. Reid will not allow over 30 bills that have already passed the House of Representatives for job creation, just because the Republicans came up with the idea. Reid knows they would pass and he cannot allow the Republicans to take credit for helping our country in its time of need. This is pure political theater and I sincerely hope that the State of Nevada will watch this closely and realize that Reid is out for his party not his country or his fellow Americans.

  • ihateliberals

    He does understand all too well. what people don’t understand is that he is right on target for his goals to be reached and that is the total breakdown of the free market system and a move to socialism. By destroying the private sector the door is open for more government programs that lead to the eventual move to total socialism. A strong private sector means his defeat. By stating that the private sector is doing just fine in his mind he is right. It is doing just fine it is collapsing. With it’s collapse he can take over the public sector at the state level and basically do away withthe states altogether or at least control their every move.

  • Pingback: Delbert Lohmeyer