« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Regulation Tidal Wave

By Clark Barrow

July 31, 2012

A looming tax increase or the threat of higher unemployment usually receives a lot of attention in Washington, D.C. Many politicians can’t wait to lead a charge to avoid any hardship on the American families. But there is eerie silence on another front that is fast approaching our country: a tidal wave of costly federal regulations.

According to an analysis by the National Federation of Independent Business, more than 4,000 federal regulations are scheduled to be implemented over the next four years with a cost of more than $515 billion to the U.S. economy. In our world of trillion dollar deficits, anything in the billions may not sound like such a big deal anymore, but recent regulations have already added $140 billion, sending the total annual regulatory cost to $1.75 trillion. If no action is taken to stop this, the NFIB estimates that the regulatory costs will quadruple over the next four years.

So what in the world are all these new regulations? Well, most of them have to do with protecting the environment and the air we breathe. Unfortunately, the sheer cost of the regulations may produce a severe economic downturn, rather than any valuable environmental impact.

One of the most damaging regulations will force power plants to install expensive pollution control technology, which is expected to cost as much as $90 billion over 10 years – the most expensive regulation in U.S. history. This means higher energy bills that will direct small business funds to utility bills, instead of jobs.

Other regulations include the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, a measure that President Obama postponed in 2011 because of its enormous cost to the economy. Imagine that! Even our own president understood the impact! This far reaching piece of regulation would establish an unnecessarily strict air quality standard for the entire country at a cost of up to $90 billion.

To make matters worse, the science behind these new regulations is not solid. A report by the National Center for Policy Analysis found that the proposed standards produce little, if any, health benefits. Their analysis found that under the current standards, levels of ozone and other pollutants have largely decreased to safe levels. The current standards are working and there is little science to that says tighter standards will meaningfully improve the air quality for anyone.

While the environmental science is not solid, the economic impact is certain – it will be paid with billions of dollars, millions of lost jobs and the lost dreams of millions of Americans.

The solution, as with many of our problems, is to grow our economy. Excessive regulations will only increase the cost of living for Americans, forcing lower income families to sacrifice the things that contribute to a healthy lifestyle. Progress is good! Advances in environmental protection, health care treatments and nutrition have saved countless lives, but expensive household energy bills will only devour money that could be used for a higher standard of living.

Putting aside all of these other figures, the true cost of the proposed regulations can be summed up in the fact that the American Thoracic Society found that the number one risk factor for asthma is poverty, not pollution. It’s time environmental regulations protected us.

 

Read More: www.ClarkBarrow.com

COMMENTS

  • rightlane1111

    I had a link, that is posted above that shows just how bad these regulations are. Regulations such as those stated and the one that I tried to get on this board…are horrible and they will bankrupt this country. Look at this one example of Hercules … and you will see how bad this really is.

  • Pingback: Montana Attorney General Candidate Proposes “Environmental Crimes Unit” | Media Trackers Montana

  • gafisher

    It may be that most of our politicians believe we’ve already crossed the Cloward-Piven tipping point and that additional damaging regulations would be about as significant as breaking a few windows on August 5th 1945 in Hiroshima.

  • justperhaps45

    Regulations must require an existence justification, have a finite predetermined life and be administered in a manner biased in favor of the local public (effected community). This may require regional action across adjacent political boundaries. Legal standing should be based on levels of effect. They must:
    1) Be requested by the effected community. Local elected and community leaders must request protection through a public (open meetings) process.
    2) Have a proper root / cause analysis. Need must be independently verified (measured) and directly associated with a cause or hierarchy of causes (scientifically apportioned). Subjected to state court review / approval)
    3) Have a public cost / benefit study, that is complete and peer reviewed. All data and projections must be verifiable.
    4) Have an effectiveness testing protocol in place and determined to be scientifically appropriate before implementation. A schedule of ongoing review must be in place and enforced. Failure to properly review must cause immediate suspension of the regulation.
    5) Have a plan for relief if the solution fails the effectiveness test. Namely it must be suspended pending review of justification. Bias must be for not regulating.
    6) Have an significant penalty for dishonesty or incompetence. Any person found deliberately or negligently falsifying information significant to the approval or review processes shall be liable for the cost of correction and may be found criminally culpable of fraud.
    7) Not be onerous. No business or community will face multiple independent regulating organizations. In complex cases agencies may construct teams to inspect and report, but it is the responsibility of the regulating experts to be clear as to causes and the level of correction required. Regulators must confine their rulings to measurable outcomes, never methods of correction.
    8) Administered for positive results. Regulators must be prepared with solution best practices and suggested corrections. The agency is responsible to maintain a current solution and compliance method data base available to the effected community.
    9) Have community centric goals. It is the duty all levels of the regulating agency(s) to foster voluntary performance.
    10) Installed on a level playing field. All actions against a citizen, business or public entity shall be subject to local review and adjudication. The cost of failure to provide local access shall be borne by the regulating agency.

  • rightlane1111

    When I try to pull it off and click on my server…it disappears…so I am hoping that this will work. I have been reading up…YET again on HTML….and for the life of me…this site is HARD. But this is relevant…I hope you can pull it up:

    A HREF=http://cnsnews.com/news/article/doj-colorado-family-give-your-religion-or-your-business>Did You See This