« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

An Open Letter to Conservatives

From the Desk of an Eternal Optimist

Dear Fellow Conservative:

Election Day 2008 produced a liberal governing majority that no one envisioned even as little as two years ago. The Democrats control both chambers of Congress as well as the Presidency. And while they are motivated by politics rather than solutions, Americans perceive them as the true agents of change and reform.

Buried within election data is troubling news. The Republican Party is losing grassroots support, and conservatives are peeling away from the party. According to exit polls, one-in-five self-identified conservatives voted for Barack Obama, clearly illustrating the Republican Party’s inability to project conservative values with credibility.

And this reality has been manifested into a set of greater truths: Americans in 2009 believe that Republicans are tied to the status quo, cannot be trusted on the issues that matter most to them, and are incoherent when articulating a positive vision for the future.

But in light of this, I believe Republicans, by firmly embracing conservative solutions-based traditions, can rise again and set the best course for America. From the desk of an eternal optimist, better days are ahead.

Before coming to Congress, I helped transform the Republican Party in the State of Georgia from permanent minority party status to a governing, conservative, principled and solutions-based majority. Now, it is some of the most fertile ground for conservatives in the nation. This happened in Georgia because of a commitment to what is at the core of leadership: to lead with principle! Yet right now, conservatives are correct about a Washington in which too few are fighting consistently for their values and concerns.

The Republican Party is at its best when its leadership has a bold vision and is rooted to conservative principles: personal responsibility, liberty, limited government, traditional values, providing for the common defense, and optimism about the future. But Republicans seem to have lost the ability to intelligently or ideologically define these principles and convey them to the American people.

Moreover, elected conservative leaders need to act immediately in order to facilitate the rebuilding of the Republican Party and reconnect it to the conservative movement.

  • Back to basics: The first step starts with a little bit of self-reflection and “re-learning” the core principles of conservatism. Only through understanding the past can our core principles be applied and developed into meaningful solutions to tackle the challenges facing America.
  • Party of Solutions: A new Republican platform of ideas and language must be created and championed, built on a foundation of conservative solutions. It will also need to be built from the ground up from fresh and innovative ideas.
  • Rebuild the party’s infrastructure and coalitions: There must be a specific focus on nurturing the grassroots, shoring up ties with existing coalitions and leading thinkers, and creating new infrastructure to meet the challenges of politicking in a new century.
  • Hold Democrats accountable: This begins with a proactive and coordinated strategy between elected conservative leaders and outside allies. Americans need to be reminded on a daily basis that Democrats want to play politics and centralize power, raise taxes, cut defense spending, and undermine traditional values.
  • Go on offense, engage and educate: Yes, Virginia, someone in Washington is fighting for you. And when Republicans stay on offense and engage, then it garners attention and provides opportunities to educate every American on conservative solutions that work. Look no further than the Energy Revolt on the floor of the House of Representatives this past August which gave Republicans a needed voice and identity.
  • Remain unified and disciplined: Hostile Democrat majorities and liberal special interests are more energized than they have been in decades. Without unity and discipline, the differences between the two parties become blurred, and conservatives have every right to question allegiance to Republicans.
  • Reclaim the American lexicon: Democrats have been successful in altering the mindset of what made this nation great through language and institutions. Once, Americans valued “responsibility,” “self-determination,” and “hard work.” Now, these ideals have been replaced by fuzzy appeals to “diversity,” “fairness,” and “social justice.” No longer can Republicans cede the language or institutions.
  • Broaden the appeal: Republicans win elections when they run on an across-the-board conservative solutions-based agenda. However, the appeal must be broadened to acknowledge and embrace the demographics in our country. Failure to do so will relegate the party to permanent minority status.

My letter ends with a direct appeal to you. With continued optimism and clarity of purpose, action can be taken to rebuild the Republican Party, reconnect it to its conservative roots and provide the solutions to tackle the challenges facing America. Last week’s principled and unified opposition to a big-government spending spree that would mortgage our nation’s future and prolong economic strife was just the beginning. Please join me and set us on the course for a better tomorrow.

Yours truly,
Tom Price, M.D.

COMMENTS

  • USNJIMRET

    “Moreover, elected conservative leaders need to act immediately in order to facilitate the rebuilding of the Republican Party and reconnect it to the conservative movement.”
    Bassackwards.
    Reconnect to Conservative Ideals, THEN rebuild the Republican Party!
    It’s a minor detail, perhaps, but one that drives most of the rest.
    Other then that, I agree with almost all he says, and all that he implies.
    However, if this is passed on to only sites like this, already Conservative, then it amounts to little more then preaching to the choir.

  • http://streetlevel.blogtownhall.com Darvin_Dowdy

    …comprised mostly of selfish people viciously protecting their own little patch of turf. Cong. Price, look at the GOP governors who came to DC this past weekend clamoring for their share of the Obama SPlan. Lobbying the Senate to approve the OPlan. Undoing everything that you and your valiant colleagues accomplished and giving Obama just what he wanted – Bipartisan support for his Splan.

    Cong. Price, I’m loving your words here. Exactly what is needed but our party and the Conservative Movement are too fragmented at this time. They’re still in strong denial regarding the severity of the problem(s). They have not reached bottom yet. Come back when they wake up one morning, face down in the gutter. Darvin Dowdy

    • USNJIMRET
      • http://streetlevel.blogtownhall.com Darvin_Dowdy

        …I think this will be completed in the public works portion of the Obama stimulus plan. DD

  • hoosierpope

    Notice how your second point is “party of solutions”, that violates your later “reclaim the American Lexicon” point because this already implies that government is the place where solutions are to be sought. I have voted republican for all of my adult life, but I’m warning the Republicans that if they pass ANY sort of “stimulous” package at all rather than oppose it on principle (and learn how to articulate that principle), then I’m going to be calling for the disolution of the Republican party. It is sad when they put up for president a guy that is the least attractive option for conservatives among the in-party options, and there are two people on the final ballot far more conservative than the nominee (Baldwin and Barr).

    • Rod_Patrick

      1. Listen to yourselves there in DC. Some of you don’t sound like republican or conservative.

      We have been listening to all of you. But some of your colleagues, Mr. Congressman (especially those in the Senate), speak like a democrat, not “conservative”. If we want a Democrat-based solution, we will look for a real Democrat politician, not a politician with a badge of R but talks and acts like a Democrat. We always go for the real thing, not the fake one.

      2. Your colleagues must also listen to the base.

      Republican Leaders don’t have the monopoly of solutions. The Conservative base can offer basic solutions that are grounded by our mutually accepted conservative principles. Listening to us, sometimes, can give you an idea what’s wrong at the ground. Please make an effort on reaching out the base by listening to their concerns and their ideas on a regular basis, not only during election season.

      Tip: Almost all types of conservatives are lurking here at REDSTATE. It’s really a good channel to address our communication gaps. You can tell that to your colleagues in the Congress.

      Nevertheless:

      I CONGRATULATE ALL THE HOUSE REPUBLICANS AND THE 11 DEMOCRATS FOR YOUR COURAGE IN SAYING “NO” TO THE PELOSI/OBAMA STIMULUS (TO BOTH GOVT SPENDING AND TO BUDGET DEFICIT) BILL.

      Hats off for all of you!!!

  • cump

    Personalize. In an effort to display to the American public that Conservative Republicans are working for the betterment of the country, we will need to personalize the needs. It is one thing to say the current government spending bill is inflated, but words need to be spoken as to how the ‘bloat’ affects a group of Americans, or a specific individual. Use NAMES, personalize the issue.

    By personalizing the issue, we should begin thinking of how this affects our neighbor, and of course, us.

    The closing of Gitmo…use words that show how this move affects someone in Kansas…or better yet, California.

    The hiring of apparent tax cheats into cabinet positions…Personalize it. Bring to light that “Jack Spratt” who lives in Florida cannot get away with this, and give examples of what the penalties would be. IE, loss of job, loss of security clearance, etc. Perhaps this is a spot for “Joe the Plumber.”

    I feel if we can ‘personalize’ the issues, and show we are fighting for the rights, freedoms, and opportunities of individuals, conservatives will again rise to the top.

    Well stated, Congressman Price.

    forgive any spelling \punctuation mistakes…I’m sitting in a meeting, but had to respond!

  • http://streetlevel.blogtownhall.com Darvin_Dowdy

    …the rnc or the congressional repub’s never have a problem finding your address and sending you a letter begging for money. But when’s the last time they used that massive database of addresses to send out an exhaustive survey? Asking for your input on issues? They’re not interested in hearing/listening. They’re not interested in the opinions of a bunch of hicks out here in flyover country. They know whats best for us and we should just be vote for them and then keep silent. They’re too busy [focusing on the lobbyists, the msm and other ngo's] to listen to us. DD

    • E Pluribus Unum
      • itrytobenice

        I have received surveys as well. They have questions like this:

        1. Do you disapprove of the Democrats’ plans to raise taxes and destroy American business?

        2. Do you approve of the Republicans’ determination to protect and defend America?

        3. If you answered yes to these questions, please send money.

        It just goes overboard in their efforts to show me that the really don’t shiv a git about what I think. Just my $. And then when they have a chance to vote, they vote to waste, squander and otherwise treat my money and work with complete contempt.

        • wkeller

          Now you pay attention?? You guys pissed away 2006 with your spending and immigration stance. Your “gang of 14″ insured that Democrats will forever have the upper hand in SCOTUS selections. Your Medicare Part D relegates our children to poverty and the upcoming Boomers to the dregs of healthcare. Your spending orgy drove national debt at a formerly unseen rate. Your reaching across the isle became a lovefest that is on the verge of creating our very own socialist republic. And now – NOW you get it?? Now you ask for our trust? Now you ask for our support?? Really?? You’re a fool sir.

          Try this as a solution:

          * Repeal the Community Reinvestment Act
          * Break up Freddie and Fanny
          * Do what you were going to do – purchase bad morgages and auction them off.
          * Repeal Mark to Market rules.
          * Eliminate capital gains for 3 years.
          * Cut the lowest tax rates to 5% and 7.5%
          * Impose a departmental spending freeze to inflation plus 1%
          * ATB personnel cuts of 3%
          * Take a look at what departments could be eliminated – the NEA comes to mind
          * You are expecting the American taxpayer to suck it up – time for our government to as well.

          The Republicans have lost traditional conservatives like me. You have become the Democrat-lite party. Unless you shape up – and FAST – you will fade into the dustbin of history.

      • AceInTX
        • $peciallist


          “No more Words…and no more promises of Love”….Mr. Lemon
  • E Pluribus Unum

    Congressman, we’ve BEEN listening. What we have not been doing is ruthlessly pruning the electoral side of our orchard, especially those called ‘Senators’. I realize that’s outside of your purview.

    I rather like your outline for success, although not all the commenters agree. I plan to plagiarize it. Hope you don’t mind, but I’ll also try to cite you and your guys on it.

  • NightTwister

    Once the whining phase is over, we can get down to business. Apparently, that’s still going to go on for awhile.

    Thanks for this, Congressman Price. I’m ready to get to work. I’m happy to see there are some congressmen like you that are ready as well.

  • AceInTX

    when discussing rebuilding the Republican Majority…Let’s hope they all get the message and that they haven’t sold conservatives too far down the river for us to recover the lost ground!

  • Brian Hibbert

    As you can see, much of our base is still angry at our elected officials for not coming to the light sooner. Now we have an uphill climb to fight off the socialism and take back our government.

    I’ve put away the long knives and hope my fellow conservatives will as well. Actually, I never really pulled them out. I don’t see the point in the self mutilation that we have been involved in since the last election. This party has needed to get back to basics and it seems our leadership has finally gotten that message.

    Now we need to start working together.

    Congressman Price, please do what you can to keep ALL the Republicans on OUR side for the next 2 years. The Democrats are going to push through all sorts of non-sense with or without our help. We don’t need to give them cover to claim bipartisan support for their programs.

  • woodsman

    The delineation has become murky. We have Republicans voting as something less than conservative, while still claiming the mantle of being a Republican as a badge of honor.

    From my perspective we have some house cleaning to do and start acting like conservatives again and get back on message. Only then could anyone tell the difference between being a Republican or Republican Lite public servant.

  • Mark Prince

    Do the exact opposite of what you have been doing. Don’t claim to be the party of small government and then have senators and other elected officials get involved in a women’s medical affairs.

    You guys told us that you were against having government involved in the personal decisions of health that are best left up to doctors and patients. Then, you go around getting personally involved. Not setting up a bureaucracy, but actually getting personally involved.

    I don’t agree with pulling the plug. But, the news began to focus on that poor women in florida and it made a circus out of the whole event. If we had left the family alone to make the right decision then the liberal media would not have applied so much pressure.

    Now, the country thinks that you guys aren’t really going to stay out of peoples biz so they figure they might as well get free healthcare out of it. I know a lot of conservatives who feel like they would rather just stay home than vote because that way they can meet there maker with clean hands. They don’t want to vote at all because you guys were bigger spenders than liberals.

    Since when is it a conservative principle to “spread freedom” and “nation build with democracy”. Talk about wasteful government spending. Reagan ended the cold war by economic embargo’s and threatening other regions. It did not cost us so much. Hussein was going to back down. He was obviously a scared sissy as evidenced when we captured him.

    And furthermore, when we bomb someone back to the stone ages we are not required to rebuild their society. Losing a war should suck! Maybe if they have to clean up the mess, they will be occupied. What kind of a message does that send that we are going to get rid of dictators and create democracy. If you mess with us, we will fix all your problems for you! All at the tax payers expense and the blood of my brothers and sisters. Sounds like a hand out to me.

    And one last thing, we are not scared of you or terrorists. We, the average citizen, have the right to bear arms and protect ourselves. Im starting to think that the only defense I can rely on is my friends. I’ve been thinkin about how we spend all this money on defense but every time someone wants to attack us, they are not stopped. Why cant we stop Arabs with box cutters. These guys blew up trucks under the WTC twice before this. After that, doesn’t it just make plain common sense that foreigners don’t get flight lessons, or truckers drivers licenses, or freight operators training. I mean, just because we are the most hospital place in the world does not require us to be stupid.

    Please, do nothing. I can take care of myself. Let the libs hang themselves on their own legislation. America always comes back around. Maybe in the process they will screw up and do something right for once.

    • JHancock

      On the second point, not the first

      1) Total War NOT Nation Building. We should be setting up camp on the oil fields now, not policing Baghdad or Falluja. If a region of an occupied country causes trouble-bomb the electrical plants and major bridges in and out of the area and take control of the major roads. We don’t need to nation build Iraq to control Iraq.

      2) We do need to get involved “in other peoples business ” when their business is unethical and detrimental or contrary to the constitution or basic human rights. In the case of pulling the plug, there was conflict between interested parties in the Florida case, and suspicion of secondary gain on the part of the husband (primary decision maker)–as a lawful society we have the obligation to make sure the rights and autonomy of our citizens is upheld-in this case to make sure the husband was acting in his wife best interest using substituted judgment and not his personal preference

      3) I also would emphasize that just like slavery was not a plantation owners personal business, neither is abortion a mothers business. There is a societal obligation that we, The Party Of Lincoln, should carry in being a voice for the voiceless, and recognizing human life and potential where other people saw “exploitable sub-humans” (in the case of slavery), and “disposable non-people” (in the case of abortion).

      • Mark Prince

        If we have poli’s on our side that do it for issues of pro-life. Then who is to say that the libs aren’t going to get involved in your medical decisions. If there is a legal issue, then the courts and family can make their case. But, elected senators and repre’s who stop congress to bring attention to the issue. That is disrespectful. That lady and her family were made into a national news story. Can you imagine a loved one of yours being shown to the country from her hospital bed? Especially at a time like that. The liberal media basically killed her. They made it impossible for most viewers to drawn any other conclusion but to pull the plug. The country was for it, unfortunately. That situation created a lot of pressure on the people involved to make a decision. The whole country was watching them and wait for it.

        Also, it makes us look stupid. That is exactly the type of thing we are warning the country about when it comes to socialism. Let the family work it out. With the proper support of friends I am sure that they would have made a christian choice.

        This is why the country does not trust us. We say we are for something, but really, we make exceptions when it benefits us and we look like lairs. Either we are for government involvement in health care or we are not. This is why we are losing, we are not standing on principle.

        Our leaders set a dangerous precedent and I think we are going to pay the price.

        • JHancock

          It’s not the FAMILY who gets to make the decision, but the patient. Legally the family must use what is called “substituted judgment”. This means that their decision must be based on their knowledge of the patient and what the patient would be most likely to ask for could she speak. The family’s preference has no place in the discussion, because if the discussion is based on what they want and not what the patient would want, the patient is effectively being denied her “autonomy” (medical speak for her right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness). Since the family was in disagreement there was an ethical responsibility to find out if either side had any personal reasons for wanting what they wanted, and then trying to discern what the patient actually wanted.

          I agree about the media though, that was an invasion of privacy-it should have been dealt with in a closed court session with input and corroboration from friends and family who have been thoroughly explained the medical ethic of patient autonomy.

          • Mark Prince

            Which means that it is government involvement in a medical issue.

            My reference to family is specific to that situation, but carries over to area’s where minors or the elderly might be involved . The point is, the surviving husband, parents, and any other persons that are interested in resolving the conflict can work it out without the government.

            For example, instead of a closed court session, how about religious guidance. Or, if they are not religious, then whatever form of guidance they feel they need, if any. If someone is hiding something it is more likely that another mediator will be able to bring that out.

            In terms of members disagreeing with each other and accusations of bias. Why would you assert that the court is the best place to work that out? Courts are a folly with a host of issue’s that determine testimony and evidence.

            You are advocating a dangerous position. If a court rules one way or the other. That ruling becomes a way to open future medical issues to court review.

            Its either government involvement or not. You can’t argue that one branch can but another can not with authority.

            Messing with the current system will have unintended consequences. If we let the courts get involved, then pregnancy will become . For example, the current legal structure does not recognize the baby as a life. So, if a pregnant women is in court regarding a medical decision that pertains to her baby, then what is that life according to the court? If they don’t recognize it as a life, then is it her property? Most likely the court will not rule that it is her property because it is inside her. Property, by definition, is external which means they might not recognize its existence. They might try to work it out and not have a precedent to follow and decide that they can not recognize it. You can see all the possible scenario’s. How will the court handle minors when there is a dispute regarding pregnancy and parents are asserting some type of prerogative?

            With church there is no disputing life and the judgment is final and ultimate. Facing your church leader might remind people what is the most important.

            Courts are great for lots of things but do not address the most important aspects of life.

          • JHancock

            you still face the issue of the patient’s rights being violated if family is not acting using substituted judgement. What you are proposing is like saying that in the event of incest, or spousal abuse “the family should work it out”. When families might not be acting in someone’s best interest, especially if it is someone who cannot advocate for themselves, then the courts stand up for their rights. In the Schivo case, this was the right to refuse burdensome, but lifesaving medical treatment. They were not attempting to rule on medical decisions per se, but were making sure a patients proxy (assuming he is using substituted judgement) is in charge (as presumably the patient would direct he be). The issue isn’t ruling on healthcare decisions, but rather in protection of personal rights.

          • JHancock

            If you really want to keep the courts out of it then support a clause making the Doctor, or a community ethics board decision maker. That way if a family has ulterior motives (life insurance, government benefits, child support, a religious ideology not shared by the patient), the patient’s rights will still be upheld.

  • Sundayjack

    Reclaiming the lexicon has to start by calling this atrocious legislative avalanche exactly what it is, and NOT concede the title of “stimulus.” It’s no such thing, and if we allow it to continue being called that, we lose half the debate. The president’s marketing team is busy churning out ads that will paint people like me as “standing in the way of stimulus.” I had to listen for a decade or more while the concept of returning tax payers’ money was referred to as “tax cuts for the rich.” Can we PLEASE call this bill exactly what it is – “the Socialism they promised us.” Uppity Keynesian academics have a perfect storm playing out before them, and we’re already losing the battle of words because it’s assumed that government action is GOOD, and more of it would be BETTER. Fix that. Please!!

    Don’t make me come down there! I have a pitchfork and a torch in my shed, and I’m not afraid to use them!

    Signing off, I’ll thank you sincerely for your sturdy, principled, and CORRECT vote against this horrible devolution playing out in front of us. It isn’t progress, and it certainly isn’t revolutionary.

  • OccamsRazor

    Thank you for dropping by Redstate.

    Most of us here however recognize the pattern of sweeping verbage and grandiose ideas and can very vividly understand the difference between words and action.

    Be more specific next time, and make certain it happens.

    Thanks.

    OR