« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why is Obama Bailing Out Greece? And Why is the MSM Covering Up For Him?

Promoted from the diaries

Decades ago, when British Prime Minister Harold Macmillen was asked by a journalist what would decide an upcoming election, he replied: “Events, my dear boy, events.”  As we take stock of where we are – and what’s likely to happen between now and the first Tuesday of November – it’s clear that one of the greatest “events” facing us today – which also has the potential to escalate much further – is the European debt crisis.

The mainstream media has given a lot of coverage to the debt crisis and the bailout bonanza it’s unleashed – first the Greek bailout, then the Irish and Portuguese bailouts, then Greece again.  But the MSM conveniently forgets to mention two important things: the role of the International Monetary Fund in funding these bailouts (one-third of the cost, actually), and the fact that America is the largest contributor to the IMF.

This month, the European Union unveiled its umpteenth bailout of Greece, bringing the total cost of that bailout alone to $500 billion (or more than the entire Greek economy).  That doesn’t include the cost of the Ireland and Portugal bailouts (combined total: $259 billion), and the growing likelihood that Spain and Italy will need bailouts too.  While the MSM looks the other way, a critical mass of bloggers and activists are starting to ask the question, “At a time when America is borrowing over $1 trillion every single year, why are we borrowing more money – much of it from China – to bail out Europe?”

Even the White House understands the political potency of this issue.  At last week’s White House press briefing, Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest was asked whether the Administration would come to Congress to request more funding for the IMF.  Earnest said “further contributions” to the IMF are “off the table.”  But that’s misleading.  Every month, the IMF is using “further contributions” from you – the taxpayer – through America’s $68 billion IMF quota plus a separate $100 billion line of credit called the “New Arrangements to Borrow” (NAB) – for the European bailouts.  Those bailouts could be stopped by the Administration, but they refuse to take action.  Why?  Because they support the bailouts (albeit quietly).  And the media won’t call them out on it.  And so, it’s time for Congress to take action to protect your tax money.

I have introduced legislation, HR 2313, that would repeal the Administration’s $100 billion line of credit to the IMF.  As of today, only $7 billion of that $100 billion has been committed, so we have up to $93 billion to protect and designate for deficit reduction.  Every day, that money is in jeopardy of being committed by the IMF, so we don’t have time to waste.  And should Spain or Italy need a bailout, there is no question that most of the $100 billion will disappear, and quickly.

My bill has 91 cosponsors.  Sen. Jim DeMint has introduced a similar bill in the Senate – S. 1276 – which has 25 cosponsors, more than half the Republican Conference.  At the very least, we should have a public debate about whether or not America should be involved in these European bailouts.  And the Administration should be honest about its support for them.  If the mainstream media won’t hold the Administration accountable, Congress and the blogosphere must do it for them.  I, for one, will continue to oppose American involvement in a European TARP.  We cannot afford to take the “too big to fail” philosophy to a global level.  The only thing “too big to fail” is America itself.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) is Vice Chair of the House Republican Conference.  A compilation of her work against the IMF bailouts can be found here

COMMENTS

  • kmpesq

    I’d like to take a stab at this one…

    Obama’s only concern is winning re-election. The economy seems to be recovering, despite the anchor thrown around its neck by this President. However, we know that his buddies that occupy many of the executive suites on Wall St (especially Goldman Sachs) are heavily invested in European bonds, etc. Thus, if European nations default on those bonds, the whole system goes kerblewy and people begin to notice a precipitous drop in their 401k’s just about the time that they head to the polls in the fall.

    Obama is a complete and utter joke of a President. He has no respect for the people he is charged with governing nor the Constitution to which he has sworn his Oath. He has violated laws after law and, as a result, people have been killed (Fast and Furious, et. al). Quite simply, Madam Congresswoman, it is my position that President Obama has proven that he is entirely unfit for the Presidency and, as I believe that Fast and Furious rises to the level of a high crime or misdemeanor, I would encourage the drafting of Articles of Impeachment against President Obama.

    • The_Gadfly

      Give the impeachment screeds a rest. While I concur that many of his actions meet the criteria, it is first necessary to recognize that impeachment is an act of political will, not law. And if anything Congress over the last 11 years, and particularly the last 3, has clearly demonstrated they have no political will.

      As for your line of political reasoning on why we have the backdoor support for the Euro-bailouts, I don’t know that I’d pursue that too far. The last time we did we got TARP. I’m not eager to see Son of TARP. I expect that to resolve the crisis in Europe we will need to bail them out and that it is in our best interest to do so because of the interconnectivity of world trade. Where the current plans go wrong is that the bailout isn’t the solution, it’s the analgesic that relieves some symptoms while the fundamental problems are addressed. So far all the plans have been all analgesic and not work on the fundamental problems. Europe has to reform their economies away from the sclerosis of Socialism and to free markets. If they make those changes first, it is in our self-intrest to provide the support lines to keep things working. If we do cut them off, we also need to be cognizant of the adverse impacts that will have on us.

      *As in, ‘we don’t live in Perfect’.

      • edintexas

        The problem is the Europeans (certainly not the politicians, and to a lesser extent [depending on the country] the people) have neither the desire, nor the will, to make the needed changes you wish. Under that condition, any money we contribute to keeping their boat afloat is money (debt) which might be better reserved to cover the impact on this country.

      • jiminga

        has all the money going to the banks. All the Greek banks have had runs and all are now insolvent. So bailing out the Greek banks is designed to protect the TBTF US banks with huge European exposure. So, it really is TARP II for the US banks. A better idea (with tongue in cheek) would be to simply give the money to the US banks and skip the money laundering costs. Or better yet, give the money to the US taxpayers, stimulating the economy and providing new jobs while watching the inevitible collapse of southern Europe.

        It’s all just kicking the can down the road with the road leading to a cliff. And along the way, the people of both continents suffer while the banksters profit from government corruption.

        This will not end well.

        • skorrent1

          “…borrowing money – much of it from China-…” That simply is not true anymore. Last December, while we were trying to finance our roughly $100b/month deficit, China had a net sale of $32b from their holdings! This brought them to a post-2010 low of $1.1t. Russia has cut its holdings in half by 14 consecutive months of selling. In fact, total foreign holdings dropped by $18b in December. Even as the Euro was getting more shakey, the world stopped buying the Dollar. We got problems, folks!

          Treasury has only one reliable customer— the Fed! Can anyone say: “Monitizing the debt?”

  • acat

    Why, indeed, should the American taxpayer be underwriting Europe’s decision to wind down their great experiment in a common currency?

    Mew