Always wanted to say that.

I appreciate the thought. I’d like to think it was King reading my diary, or having it called to his attention. However, all across right-blog land, many, many bloggers have been calling, for years, for our Congress-critters to man up and play hardball. The Tea Parties held a message not unlike that. My guess is that some of these guys are hearing the call, and answering it.

Good for them, I’ll take it.

Of the nationally prominent elected Democrats who should stand trial for treason, I got:

John F-ing Kerry - meeting with the NV while still a member of the USN circa 1972.
Bob McDermott - going to Iraq circa 1991 and denouncing the US on TV.
Nancy Pelosi - undermining the war by visiting tin-pot despot Syrian dictator, circa 2007.
Harry Reid - “this war is lost”.
Just getting warmed up too.

I’m not saying that this particular instance is that bad, but Aaron, can you really tell me honestly that you haven’t seen a current in the general discussions on counter terrorism that implies we should do whatever is necessary, as opposed to whatever is legal?

I’m no bleeding heart. If you read my posts I agree that we should hang pirates, investigate Pelosi, whatever it takes.

For the dorks out there, I think I’m pretty Lawful Neutral. =)

to attack LA is so important.

White House fact sheet: “In 2002, we broke up a plot by KSM to hijack an airplane and fly it into the tallest building on the West Coast. During a hearing at Guantanamo Bay two months ago, KSM stated that the intended target was the Library Tower in Los Angeles.”
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070523.html

The only problem is, we didn’t capture KSM until 2003 (http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/rendition701/timeline/timeline_2.html), let alone waterboard him. So, INHANCED INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH FOILING TH LA PLOT. All we did was confirm the intended target of a plot we already foiled.

I think we should let all the facts come out before rationalizing and justifying actions that we have executed others for in the past.

and the “Truth” hearings are designed to suck theair out of the news cycle.
No donk will testify or be deposed. Only the GWB appointees and all the dnk news twits will be sothrilled. Nothing of what Obama’s shock troops do to theUSA will be covered. It waill be all torture all the time. Like on MSNBC last nite, a collage of “wanted posters” will be on the screen.

If the Dems were really serious about turning the U.S. into a one-party state, they’d be going ahead full-bore on these show trials, and lengthening the ‘indictment’ list every hour. (And they would have passed Card Check on, like, Day *10*!)

Instead, they’ve quasi-retreated, like a confused deer in the headlights. It now looks to me like the ’show trials’ have been called off!

Maybe Kos & co. are right after all - when the Dems really have the chance, they do seem to fail to pull the pin/go for the jugular.

In the end, what always seems to undo the Democrats is ‘not overreaches’ on their grandiose Stalinist Utopian dreams and policies - in the end, it always seems to be their inherent incompetence that’s their undoing.

Because the only polling I am seeing these days shows Obama & the Dems both plummeting to Earth, as they get 0% GOP voter support, and as increasingly large sections of the ‘independent’ vote go running for the exit!

In a mere 8 weeks, Obama managed to pass an agenda that will dwarf what George W Bush did in 8 years.

Yes, the Republicans spent too freely in the last two presidential terms. As to Obama campaign criticisms such as the $10 Billion/month cost of the Iraqi and Afghanistan wars, all I can say is “How quaint!”

Republican leaders need to present the magnitude of the future debt to the public in some easy to grasp medium (such as the repeated use of an agreed upon chart).

than the subversion of the Republic?