« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

At Emory University, Darwin’s Bullies Smear Commencement Speaker, Dr. Ben Carson of Johns Hopkins

From the diaries.

The serious problem of bullying in junior high and high school has received some overdue attention lately. Lee Hirsch’s documentary Bully is in theaters and highly recommended.

But don’t think that bullying in academic settings is exclusively a phenomenon of adolescence. Adults also bully adults. That’s what is happening now at Emory University in Atlanta.

You can be a brilliant, innovative pediatric neurosurgeon at a sky-scraping top medical school, in addition to being a generous philanthropist with an inspirational up-from-dire-poverty personal story, plus a Presidential Medal of Freedom winner, and a best-selling writer whose memoir was turned into a TV movie starring Cuba Gooding Jr.

But in the hands of academic bullies, if you once shared your critical thoughts on evolutionary science and its moral implications — well, everything else about you suddenly dwindles to very little.

Dr. Ben Carson of Johns Hopkins University is today’s target. He’s scheduled to give the Commencement address and receive an honorary degree at Emory this coming Monday. But close to 500 faculty members, students and staff protested, drawing up a gravely formulated letter to the Emory Wheel, the student newspaper, expressing their “concerns.” Over what? Carson had no intention of speaking about evolution but someone dug up an impromptu interview he once gave to a publication associated with his Christian denominationon that subject.

The protestors – lead by Professors ArriEisen, Jaap De Roode, Nicole Gerardo, and IlyaNemenman — distorted Dr. Carson’s position on the moral implications of Darwinian materialism and insinuatingly questioned his grasp of the science behind evolution. Emory hasn’t withdrawn the invitation and the letter’s signatories don’t demand that. But they try to make him sound like a fool, putting in his mouth the absurd opinion that “those who accept the underlying principle of biology and medicine are unethical.”

Carson in fact explained that he’s not impressed by the evidence for Darwinian theory. He also commented on why a materialist philosophy is at odds with free will and how that makes it tough to offer a coherent account of moral principles.

The academic bullying that Emory’s faculty has visited on Dr. Carson is not an isolated episode. Scientists who ask tough questions about evolutionary theory are routinely intimidated and silenced by advocates of Darwinian orthodoxy.

Journalists and courts of law have documented a variety of other, far more disturbing cases of bullying for Darwin, at academic institutions including Jet Propulsion Laboratory at CalTech, the University of Kentucky, Iowa State University, the Smithsonian Institution, and elsewhere.

Emory’s spokesman, meanwhile, has struggled to explain how a Darwin-critic could possibly have received such an invitation.”Our leading life scientists would define our views on evolution,” he sniffed, “and the number of signatories on that petition would probably speak to that.” This is a shameful, and shaming, way to welcome a guest.

The onus is on university officials now to defend Dr. Carson’s right to hold a dissenting view, and to promptly reaffirm that Emory is pleased and honored to have him. Discovery Institute is gathering signatures on a petition making exactly that point. Please sign.

Dr. Carson’s unwelcoming welcome sends a message to less renowned and therefore less bullet-proof scholars. If they open their mouth to question Darwin, fellow academics will not only disagree but will hurt them by misrepresenting their opinions.

Imagine the results if he were someone else: a young scientist seeking a strong start to his career, a not so young but still untenured scientist with his livelihood to protect, even a tenured academic worried about his reputation and the future careers of his own grad students.

This is how Darwinists maintain the fiction that the scientific community has reached a freely determined “consensus” in favor of Darwinian evolution and against intelligent design. The consensus is maintained by intimidation, by bullying.

It’s a farce, but for vulnerable people in academic life, a scary farce.


David Klinghoffer is Senior Fellow and Editor, Evolution News & Views, Center for Science and Culture

COMMENTS

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    or else!

  • ThePoliticalHat

    … then I don’t see why anyone ought to raise a hackle about it.

    That being said, it does Dr. Carson no good to mix a defense of his speaking for unrelated reasons with an attack on “Darwinism” or roundabout whining that people won’t consider the unscientific “Intelligent Design” as a valid scientific theory. All that does is give ammo to those who want to persecute and purge people for their non-relevant beliefs.

    • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

      If I had to name Ten People in the World now living and least likely to whine, Dr, Carson would certainly be on it.

      His public profession of faith in Christ, as I remember it from the early 90s, seemed sturdy enough to indicate that he is likely much more concerned about little things like “truth” than about what will do him “no good”.

      • ThePoliticalHat

        …but to the author. I apologize if that was not clear.

        • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

          • ThePoliticalHat

            “Imagine the results if he were someone else: a young scientist seeking a strong start to his career, a not so young but still untenured scientist with his livelihood to protect, even a tenured academic worried about his reputation and the future careers of his own grad students.

            “This is how Darwinists maintain the fiction that the scientific community has reached a freely determined

          • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

            paynoattentiontotheserandomkeystrokesofthisparticularlocusofenergy

      • Mr_Ed

        Not sure what you mean by “public confession” but I first met Dr. Carson in 1989 and his Christian faith had been well known for several years.

        • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

          In hindsight I know the two are frequently juxtaposed to highlight the difference between living faith and hypocrisy, but that wasn’t my intent. I just wanted to frame my statement with caution since I literally haven’t heard anything of him since probably 1991. Our kindergarten-aged daughter watched his video clips so much that one of her a-c dolls soon ended up with (working) IV drips and stitched incisions–probably a factor in not many friends coming over to visit. In addition to his faith think I remember him saying he worked best to Mozart. Do you know him well?

          • conservingamerica

            if the faculty at Emory wish to protest the granting of an honorary degree to a man on the grounds stated in the petition, they’re well within their rights in doing just that.

            Dr. Carson’s statements in that interview cited is painfully inept as philosophy and simply inaccurate in discussing science and evidence…..

            His faith and believes clearly seem important to him and he’s certainly entitled to them….just of the beliefs of biologists and other members of Emory are important to them.

            Emory’s faculty has no less right to Dr Carson’s beliefs than does Dr Carson has to reject the scientific concensus accepting evolution.

          • Matthew Morris

            “Dr. Carson

        • jpmhofct

          Darwinism and global warming and same sex marriage all have in common the simple fact that they attempt to redefine society as it has been in order to create a brave new world of their advocates. Bullying is their favorite tactic. Please don’t make any comments that disagree with them as they are the smasrtest and most powerful and most deserving of control over all things.
          Ceretainly the idea that there might be evidence of alternate views must be surpressed by whatever means is available as they truelty believe anything is justified to maintain their supremacy.
          It is ironic that it seldom includes logical debate but more often than not is a nasty bully approach of name calling and disgraceful misrepresentations that used to be called lies.

    • notpropagandized

      Every one of these institutions of higher learning is populated with intellectually ill and ideologically ill leftists that is not the least bit mitigated by whatever measure of intelligence the individuals can claim by virtue of IQ, GPA, Titles, Leftist-Peer-Awarded Academic Prizes/Honors. There must be a minority core of reasonable and logical academics from anywhere on the political spectrum that can speak sense to the community to reject these pathological liars that crave the quotation of science to be what they want it to be and line up with their absolutely ridiculous positions.

      We saw this at Duke and the the university was greatly embarrassed and still trying to recover with alumni and other past supporters. Be brave Emory, organize and reject these intellectual criminals.

      • joydbrower

        Keeping pace with its idelogical cousin, Global Warming/Climate Change, Dawinism has been trying to secure the title of “settled science” for a long time now – but, with each “doubting Thomas,” that’s becoming increasingly elusive. Good! Let their closed minds be breeched and a little sunlight peep through…

        • spolson

          has big holes in its theory. Only Stupid closed minded people refuse to tolerate other opinions. The most common discoveries in science is that the previously held truths were wrong. (See flat earth).

      • jiminga

        Many scientists find fault with Darwin’s theory. BTW, Darwin’s theory is a THEORY which remains unproven, but that doesn’t stop otherwise educated people from practicing blind faith in conventional wisdom.

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          The SCIENCE is settled! Your typical bio professor would no problem whatsoever calculating a markov chain showing the entire set of all possible evolutionary pathways that would allow a 1-cell amoeba to evolve into a field mouse. Not only that, but they describe this process with a fully analytic mathematical function and derive the rate at which macro-evolution occurs during all phases of the aforementioned markov chain.

          You think I’m kidding!? Of course I am. These Dawkins-wannabees are talking out of their butts.

        • joelson

          is incorrect. A scientific theory has a different meaning than the common use of the word “theory.” A scientific theory is a set of principles that explain and predict phenomena. A scientific theory does not “prove” something, but rather allows for predictions to be testable. Check out the Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory) for more information.

          Has the theory of evolution been disproved? I don’t know, as determining the accuracy of the theory of evolution is not on my personal list of priorities.

          I’m not telling you that you have to believe the theory of evolution, but am just saying that the fact it is called a “theory” is not a reason in and of itself to disbelieve it. After all, gravity is a theory (Newton’s theory of gravitation). Gravity has not been proven, but the predictions that have been made based off the theory have not been found to be wrong.

          • joelson

            of gravity. A scientific law expresses the “what,” while a scientific theory is more along the lines of “why.” There is Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation). But Newton’s theory of gravitation (why gravity exists, not what gravity does) had some issues which at this point is explained with Einstein’s theory of general relativity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation#Problems_with_Newton.27s_theory).

    • josephine

      This is an embarrassment to one of the finest universities in the south. These Nazi Leftest are just jealous because they didn’t get into Johns Hopkins. This may even hurt Emory here in the south. Who would want to be associated with a medical school that would attack one of the greatest minds in the medical field. And if i’m not mistaken this is the doctor who grew up in the slums in a lead paint apartment. He defies the entitlement mentality and also is open to all ideas on our beginnings.
      This is what Emory gets for letting these hacks in their school. No telling where they’re from.
      THEY MUST HAVE NURSED ON THEIR MOTHER FOR 4 YEARS.
      IN PUBLIC.
      And we are used to persecution, we just don’t whine and complain, we just continue to pray for those who would attack us.

  • givemefreedom

    Now that Obama has “evolved” and homosexuality is finally a legitimate part of life in America, I wondered how Darwin would have placed the “human practice” in the evolutionary chain of animal specie longevity?

    • funwithknives

      ..who are the Father and Mother of Darwinism, anyway? Do they know where their children are?

      …or did it have two daddies/ two mommies or a blended family….?