« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Seven Reasons Why August 2 Isn’t the End of the World

Promoted from the diaries.

Washington is currently borrowing about 43 cents out of every dollar it spends, and is close to maxing out its credit limit.

Current law says Uncle Sam cannot borrow more than $14.3 trillion. A few months back, the Obama Administration demanded that Congress increase the national credit line by $2.5 trillion by May 16, or else, it warned, the United States would default on its debts, causing an “economic Armageddon.”  ($2.5 trillion is just enough to aver the need for another debt hike until after the 2012 election.)

When May 16 came and went, and nothing happened, the Obama team set a new “Armageddon” date: August 2.

Unfortunately, a lot of folks in Washington and Wall Street – including some who should know better — seem to be taking this new deadline at face value.  While it’s true that, at some point, the government will hit the ceiling and have to reduce spending by about 40 percent, exactly when that day will arrive, nobody knows for sure.  And don’t believe anyone who tells you he does know.  “No man knows the day or the hour.”

Maxed Out Day could be August 2. It could be August 22.  Or it could be in September.   The exact date really depends on whether the President is willing to tap certain reserves available to him, or decides to force a political crisis.

I cannot tell you when Maxed Out Day will be.  But I can – and will — prove to you that August 2 doesn’t have to be it. Before I do so, here are three key numbers to remember:

1) We are projected to take in between $170 billion and $200 billion in August, in revenues.

2) We will likely spend about $300 billion in August.

3) Therefore, we face a gap of somewhere between $100 billion and $130 billion.

So what will happen, come the August 2 deadline?

  1. The U.S. will still be able to pay its creditors (i.e., it won’t default).  There’s no reason why the government needs to stop paying its creditors.  Ever.  Debt service payments (interest on the national debt) will only cost $30 billion in August.  As I’ve noted, we will take in $170-200 billion.
  2. Social Security checks will still go out. On July 12, President Obama suggested that, come August 2, he might not be able to send out the 50 million Social Security checks slated to go out in August. But since those checks only cost $50 billion, compared to $170-200 billion coming in, there will obviously be sufficient funds to mail them.
  3. Medicare and Medicaid payments will go out as usual. Experts predict we’ll owe about $50 billion to doctors and hospitals. Well, with $170-200 billion coming in, granny will get her health care, just like always.
  4. Veterans and active-duty military personnel will get paid. Paying our veterans will cost about $3 billion.  Ditto our soldiers in uniform.  That $6 billion is chump change by DC standards.

So that’s a total bill of $136 billion, easily covered by the $170-200 billion we’ll take in.  Of course, we won’t be able to afford everything the government currently spends on.  The Departments of HUD, Transportation, Commerce, Energy, and Education, for example, may have to take a pause while Congress works out a deal with the President.  But is that really “the end of the world”?

Earlier, I mentioned the reserve funds the President can tap.  As the Senate Finance Committee Republican staff helpfully point out:

5. The Treasury Department has $5 billion sitting idle in an account at the Federal Reserve. It can tap this account any time.

6. Treasury has close to $100 billion in mortgage-backed securities it can sell.  It bought these securities during the financial crisis to bail out housing markets.  Just last month, it sold $10.6 billion worth.

Finally, there’s a seventh reason why August 2 needn’t be anything more than another pleasant summer day in America.

7. Congress can pass the Cut Cap Balance Act (H.R.2560). This bill would give President Obama his $2.5 trillion debt increase — in exchange for three things: 1) $111 billion in cuts this coming year, 2) tight spending caps for the coming decade, and 3) congressional approval of a strong Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.  By strong, I mean one that makes it much harder for Congress to spend more than a fixed share of the economy, raise taxes, or add to the debt.

The Cut Cap Balance Act – which the House is slated to vote on today — would make this the last debt ceiling hike, ever.  Unfortunately, President Obama has threatened to veto it.  If he does, whose fault will it be when Maxed Out Day really does arrive?

Dean Clancy is FreedomWorks’ Legislative Counsel and Vice President, Health Care Policy.

 

COMMENTS

  • traversecityconservative

    and push the Republicans into voting in what WE want. The easiest, shortest phrase I can think of is “Dollar for Dollar.” We all need to contact our Rinos and tell them we will only accept a bill with a dollar of spending cuts for every dollar they raise the debt ceiling. If Obama can only find $30 billion in spending cuts, he only gets a $30 billion debt ceiling raise. McConnell’s bill won’t fly with us. DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR needs to be our new chant – and fast.

    • sanderson13

      Isn’t there about $120 billion that hasn’t been doled out?

      • http://teejaw.com TeeJaw

        but fortunately, it probably won

        • vitalis

          Medicare. Each month, when revenues don’t meet payments, the US cashes in some of those intra-government IOUs and, since we’re running a deficit, takes out public debt to get the funds. Net effect is a wash on the credit limit. We should be able to do that for the entire Social Security and Medicare outlays in the event that the limit isn’t raised. That’s $100 billion a month closer, meaning only $30 billion or less has to be cut/not paid. Of course, the make believe date that SS and Medicare become insolvent comes up a lot quicker that way, but that is really only an accounting gimmick for the feeble-minded and Democrats (but I repeat myself).

          • Flagstaff

            nt

          • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

            “We should be able to do that for the entire Social Security and Medicare outlays in the event that the limit isn

          • Flagstaff

            That’s exactly what the Trust Fund was supposed to be there for. (For SS, not for Medicare.) I don’t call it a “raid” when I take money from my IRA to pay bills. Its why I put the money there in the first place.

        • 6eorge Jetson

          It’s another future promise, overly prescriptive, terribly clumsy, and one that is unlikely to proceed to passage.

          So if Aug 2nd is armegeddon, then pass and offer them an option to avoid armegeddon. Say a two month extention ($266B increase in the debt ceiling) for some REAL, IDENTIFIED CUTs in THIS fiscal year (25% of the gap, or $66B). Then do it again in two months.

          Rich Lowry agrees with you

      • Adjoran

        So the problem isn’t the debt service or Social Security payments, at least not until the very end of the month every normal expenditure can be made.

        The problem is the rating agencies have to apply the same standard to the USA paper as they do to Greece and Spain and everyone else. Any failure to pay any due bill, even to a contractor or supplier, and any shutdown of services not passed into law as part of an austerity plan counts as a de facto default. It’s not just about paying the interest on the debt.

        If our rating is downgraded, our interest costs will jump and quickly begin eating away at the budget. We will be well and truly doomed at that point.

        And even the $2.5 trillion the Cut Cap & Balance bill promises in offsetting cuts aren’t enough to save our rating. The agencies have said it will take something on the order of double that within this ten-year budget window to maintain our AAA.

        We need to see Obama’s plan. RIGHT NOW.

        • anjinconsulting

          because it’s just a scare tactic. It has moved several times depending on whether you use Captain Zero’s caledar or Tax Cheat Timmy’s. Mr. DeVine has a great idea; show us the balance sheet, then we can start the discussions.

          The whole point of this stupid exercise is to maintain the size of the current government ,and to maintain its projection of positive growth. We need to stop using the language of that argument and call a spade a spade.

          • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

            We can ask for it but may not get it.

            Lets ask, but lets also just legislate solutions and put them out there and say “We did our part, now Reid and Obama need to do their part, pass and sign it!”

        • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

          The US did not default in 1995 when a shutdown occured.

          “Any failure to pay any due bill, even to a contractor or supplier,” … this happened in Minn. but that states did not get a default credit rating.

          So long as the interest on the debt is being paid, the other items in a shutdown should impact the ratings.

          ‘And even the $2.5 trillion the Cut Cap & Balance bill promises in offsetting cuts aren

    • ddstrain

      We also need to stop using the “only” as a modifier to the vast dollar amounts being discussed. Only implies “small”, “negligible”, “trivial” and the like to most people.

      “I have only $15 to get by til payday” is fine … “the government is taking in $130 billion in August and Social Security is only $40 billion” (or whatever the actual number are) should be avoided.

      These numbers are immense and people are jaded (or stupid enough to not think about it). People need to be reminded of just how much REAL money the boneheads in DC are using as if it were Monopoly money in their private quests for power and control.

    • Flagstaff

      Instead of “we will only accept a bill with a dollar of spending cuts for every dollar they raise the debt ceiling,” I’d say “we will only accept a bill with a dollar of CURRENT YEAR (2012) spending cuts for every dollar they raise the debt ceiling.”

      Most of the cuts mentioned (not promised or even specified) as possible by Obama and his minions take place in the distant future, IOW, they are meaningless in any real sense.

      • Flagstaff

        Since the idea here is to make it clear that August 2 is no drop-dead date, we must be clear also that even as describe, in the “real world” the US would have a cash flow problem.

        When you have to depend on current receipts to pay both current and long-term obligations, the receipts have to come in before the payments go out. That would mean tax receipts would have to arrive before the first checks could be written, such as military payroll checks. IIRC, those checks are written on the 15th and the 30/31st, so no problem there. As noted above by Vitalis, the mechanism (the Trust Fund) is in place to pay ALL Social Security checks until 2037(?) without additional borrowing FOR THAT PURPOSE. SS bonds are traded for general obligation securities. So it’s perfectly clear that the “we may not pay SS checks or the military” as a rationale for raising the debt ceiling is pure political scare-mongering.

        What seems to get lost in the details of “why Obama is not being truthful” about the above is that the President’s POLITICAL problem is real–Obama will be forced to prioritize among the rest of the scheduled outlays. There are many ways to do so, but he won’t like any of them because he doesn’t like to prioritize ANYTHING. He is a “first in, first out” kind of guy, preferring to let Fate determine his moves, as long as Fate doesn’t have an “R” behind its name.

        In the “real world,” the drop-dead date resulting from a cash flow problem comes when Vinnie will no longer accept your promise pay “next week.” In the politico-financial world, there is more than one such date. One would be every date that an interest payment on T-securities is due. Another would be payday for government workers. Another would be welfare-check-day for the truly needy (and why can’t I just say “for the needy”?). Most other obligations can be delayed without causing the next guy down the line to go bankrupt. So a more honest way of talking about the current situation is perhaps a “drop-dead quarter,” and we don’t know what day within that quarter “Armageddon” arrives, any more than we know what hour on August 2 it is supposed to arrive now.

        The government has ALWAYS been a notoriously slow payer. “Drop-dead” can be delayed for months by its becoming even slower.

        The POLITICAL problem for the REPUBLICANS is that Obama has the ability to pick and choose which bills to pay or not, and they are rightly assured he’ll stiff the ones that hurt voters the most.

  • mndasher

    While there are revenue coming in at about $200 billion a month, that money will not likely be there when the expenditures are being made. For Example some social security checks are mailed on 8/3, some on 8/13, 8/20, or 8/27 depending on when your birthday is.

    One the revenue side, some people make estimated tax payments quarterly, some are paid weekly, some bi-weekly, some monthly. Other revenue may be more random as to when they come in.

    Knowing how our government never plans ahead, they are very likely not preserving any cash for the coming month. So who knows how much cash will be available on any given day of the month.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      Plus, what matters most re the Aug 2 threat is what money comes in THIS month of July, what bills are paid THIS month and what is the amount of cash on hand on Aug 1. This is so fundamental, yet Boehner has not demanded the numbers and Fox News Channel has not done a simply FOIA request? They just take the tax cheat’s word for it? Even after the May 16 date? We just take Timmy’s word for it? They do account for income and expenses in the Treasury, right? How else could Timmy say Aug 2 will be default day? Could we please ask for the damn documents he is relying on when he tells Obama to guarantee default on Aug 2?

      Jeesh

    • jaykali

      We’re going to get a modified McConnell plan that will truly piss everyone off. I don’t have any idea how it’s going to pass both houses except that they know there is no other deal so it’s going to be a take it or leave it kind of deal I’m thinking. And I’m tired of hearing ab the stupid grand bargain deal. Obama thinks he’s going to get the GOP to agree to a trillion dollars in taxes in a budget fight they started?!? How in the world does that make sense. Except that it’s a red herring and clever political maneuvering by the president. He tried something similar in December and it failed.
      Sigh…I suppose we should have know this wasn’t going to be easy. 2010 was great, we won 1 house, but Reid owns the other and Obama’s still owns the Whitehouse.

      • napensnake

        That math makes it seem like there will be plenty to perform the constitutionally authorized duties of the federal government even after the unconstitutional spending on Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid.

        Perhaps the House of Representatives, Senate, and President should revisit Article I Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution (the constitution they took an oath to uphold) when selecting the spending they should permit when we reach Fiscal Armageddon.

        • cam1

          Boehner, Cantor and Ryan saying this every day to the press. Saying this over and over will counteract the msm lies from the white house. This is a logical, easy to follow, step by step remedy to our debt crisis. All it takes now is commitment and courage. Republicans, are you listening?

      • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

        We will show today that there are Republicans who are seriously about managing the Federal Government finances in a responsible way.

        A $110 billion cut in FY 2012 is a small 3% cut. It should be more, but it is certainly not too much to ask.

        Obama’s veto threat just undermined all his media-supported baloney about wanting to compromise and willing to do a ‘grand deal’. He wants no deal except on his tax-and-spend-borrow-and-spend terms. The people can see right through this.

    • ddstrain

      pay their bills when they actually have the money. If there isn’t enough money to cover everything, then something doesn’t get paid. Paycheck-to-paycheck is how many of us get by … so should the government.

      This sounds like a cash flow problem and not an income problem. If the government needs a steady constant stream on taxpayer money to fund operations, the implement a better tax system that provides that … a national sales tax (FAIR or similar) in lieu of income tax would take care of that.

      Cutting spending is another good place to start … but apparently we are afflicted with self-absorbed, pompous, elitist, glorified home owner’s association busybody, aristocrats being in control of the purse strings.

  • Doc Holliday

    and old people. But I would not put it past Obama to try to stop payment. This person doesn’t care if veterans get paid, he just wants to destroy the opposition. If you are saying the government HAS to pay them rather than they have the money to pay them, that is good news indeed.

    • izoneguy

      The capitalists of the world are in hibernation.

      They are not coming out until Obama is gone, gone, gone…..

      They are also waiting for the Republican candidate for President who can
      take Obama down. Once the business community rallies around the person
      who can save capitalism then it is over for Obama. A trillion dollars will not save Obama’s presidency.

      The whole debt limit debate is kinda like trying to patch up the Titanic with duct tape.

    • phlogiston

      Everyone seems to want to forget the point that just because the federal Govt COULD pay its bills, that the Obama administration WILL pay those bills. Remember, this is the administration of “never let a good crisis go to waste” and Operation Fast and Furious. We should never ever forget that this is an adminstration that was willing to break the law and get Border Patrol agents killed to make a political point for gun control. If he chooses to delay payments to military, retirees, etc, he has a complicit media that will repeat the Obama line that he had no choice ad naseum. It won’t fool all the people, but it most definitely will fool multitudes of sheeple out there.

      • unclefred

        that, by a narrow majority, more that 50% of voters understand that ongoing revenues more than cover necessary spending. They also are not relying solely on the MSM for their information. This is more the case of the people getting social security checks or military pay or pensions than any other segment of the electorate.

        If the checks don’t go out, we should start a move to get people to call their DEMOCRAT reps and Senators to pressure Obama to stop hoarding money and pay HIS bills…

        • phlogiston

          IMHO, the administration will try to gauge exactly how much chaos it can get away with (i.e., blame the republican party for) and will create it. Even if the polls don’t budge, that still means almost 50% of the sheeple in this country are utterly clueless about economics. BHO and ther rest of the Demagogue Party will exploit this, exacerbate it and use it as an excuse to try to grab more power.

  • arthurmanger17

    That is the Armageddon that is feared by the Obama administration. Bogus polls and dumb questions by the main stream media on the Sunday talk shows are not enough to turn the tide in favor of socialism. The movement for smaller government is stronger now than before the midterms. The President and his party knows what will happen when our elected officials meet the people during the recess. That would be all Obama would have to do is not send out SS checks to keep the department of education open, (with a budget of 121 billion) just to name one agency that the American people are fed up with and their will be an Armageddon all right. This, all of leftistdom knows. That’s why the push for a deal now, instead of playing golf.

  • silentcal2012

    Conservatives seem to be operating under the assumption that the media will play it square and that the stock market, interntional markets, international leaders and money men wont allow a panic to swell. There may be money to cover debts, but fears stoked by the press and markets will cause a panic, send stocks tumbling, causing employers to recoil, and leaving the GOP to share the blame for a faulty economy with Obama for the first time, which Obama and Axelrod and Plouffe relish. I see little upside is making the GOP complicit in the economic turmoil, when Obama owns it and has no where to run.