« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Gallup: Obama Under 50% among ‘Adults’ in 38 States

Obama's Sub-Prime Electoral Map

Gallup has collected the data from their daily tracking polls throughout 2010 and contrasted the results to the same information from 2009.  Not surprisingly, their findings show that Obama has suffered a decline in every state since 2009.  His unpopularity is now ubiquitous.  Overall, Obama’s national approval rating has dropped 11% from 58% to 47%.  Furthermore, the polling data collected from nearly 180,000 interviews shows that Obama is viewed favorably by less than 50% of respondents in 38 states.  He is above 50% approval in just 12 states, and is viewed unfavorably by the majority of respondents in 16 states.

Here are some more highlights from the surveys:

  • Obama enjoys his highest level of approval in Hawaii (65.9%) and lowest level of approval in Wyoming (27.6%).
  • The President’s approval in his home state of Illinois is at an underwhelming 53.4%.
  • Obama’s steepest decline from 2009 was in Vermont (shocking) and Arizona (not shocking at all).
  • Obama is under 50% in states that are worth 363 electoral votes, while over 50% in states that are worth just 175 electoral votes.
  • There are a whopping 13 Democrat Senate seats up for reelection in 2012 that are in states where Obama is under water.  Only one Republican, Scott Brown, represents a state where Obama is above 50%.  Hmmm, 47+13=?

But, here is the kicker.  The polling sample represents interviews with adults living in the U.S.

Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking Jan. 1-Dec. 31, 2010, with a random sample of 179,503 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling.

Anyone who is educated in polling 101 knows that there are three levels of target audiences for public policy polling; likely voters, registered voters, and U.S. adults.  Obviously, likely voters are the only people who are consequential in political polls.  Incidentally, they are also the most favorable target audience for Republicans.  A sample of registered voters includes a broader sample, and is less favorable for Republicans because it includes more drones.

A poll that merely samples adults can include anyone living in America who owns a phone.  Such a sample can even include those who are not registered to vote, or worse, non-citizens.  Needless to say, polling data of ‘adults’ is the most favorable audience for Democrats.  The fact that Obama’s approval is so anemic even among such a broad and inconsequential sample is a clear sign that he is vulnerable in 2012.  If their interviews had filtered out non-likely voters, Obama’s polling numbers would be downright toxic in every red state.

Calling all conservative presidential aspirants…..

Red Meat Conservative (Cross-posted)

COMMENTS

  • edwyrd

    are in play for 2012, not 13

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      are in play. 13 of them “are in states where Obama is under water”- under 50%

  • edwyrd

    my mistake

  • Darin_H

    Just wanted to say that, but let’s drive him down further (and take more Senate seats)!

  • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

    And not just at our house, either. Several of our neighbors voted for him but none of them support him now. In fact, one got laid off about the time BOzo was sworn in and he still doesn’t have a job! Change he didn’t anticipate, I’m sure.

  • earlgrey

    This is cool. I just wanted to share that I was at my precinct caucus meeting Monday and there were some activists there that were getting a little cocky. I just don’t want that to spread.

    As the movement gains momentum and Obama loses ground, let us strengthen our resolve and never take for granted that conservatives still have to make the case for conservatism. Don’t be distracted by nasty personal attacks, that doesn’t convince people to change their votes.

    Fight on.

    • Scope

      but it seems that nothing propels people to work harder and longer and stronger than when they have momentum at their back, and a positive message of hope. No, O is not an easy target, but, rather than preaching “hey he is going to be hard to beat”, which he will be because of D shennanigans, there needs to be a mix of we can beat him excitement in that message. If the conservative activists have the positive attitude that we can win, and are pumped against Obama, isn’t that more infectious than anything? If the activists decided to go home and not fight that would be a different story.

      • earlgrey

        I was sharing a personal experience and saying that as Obama loses ground we must continue to fight and not be cocky. I feel like everytime I post something on this site you have to come in and challenge it in some way, and I am getting sick of it.

        I notice you left Adjoran alone on his/her post below which seems to be like more of a warning than mine really was (iMO). I am not recommending you go after him.

        I know I got nailed for pessimism in my early days here, and that was largely appropriate, but i have tempered that in my days here. I still can’t get past you half the time I post. If I want a fight I go to liberal sites and bug them, but I see you fighting people here all the time and I just don’t know why.

        Unless someone is obviously a troll I try not to get personal with people here, and I feel like even the nastiness of put down doesn’t mean we can’t have constructive dialogue at a later date. For some reason, today, I just can’t take it anymore.

        • Scope

          I have no idea what I said in my comment that set you off. I simply suggested that a balance of hope in the message, and getting people pumped up that yes we can beat him goes a long way also. If you found that to be offensive, then you are simply going after the messenger rather than the message. Also, I don’t remember replying to very many of your posts in the past, I don’t believe I have.

          • earlgrey

            My issue to your comment was more specifically that I implied Obama is giong to be hard to beat in my post. THat wasn’t what I said. I said people at my republican event were getting kind of cocky and I dont’ think that is the way to be no matter how good or bad the other candidate is. We can’t control Obama, but we can control our own behavior.

            I felt like my post was positive, but cautious, yet you still felt the need to correct me.

            Nearly every time I have had an issue or been called to task or put down on this site it has either been you doing it or you came in later to pile on.

            I just got sick of it today. I am not going to apologize for my post nor do I expect you too. However, I don’t regret what isaid.

            Have a good night.

    • EagleWatcher

      Don’t underestimate the political machine backing Professor O’Barry.

      • flannery

        nt

  • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

    Daniel,

    This lines up nicely against your February 22nd post here:
    http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2011/02/22/its-official-maryland-is-the-most-democrat-state/

    Now if the GOP can produce a contender worth some conservative salt to capture those 363 electoral votes (*perhaps 383 with Illinois — that would be sweet!), and get to the magic of 60 in the Senate.

    We’ll need a net of at least 14 Senate seats in 2012. I don’t see MA Sen. Brown getting reelected.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      the point. The potential is there for a semi landslide. There is no doubt that if we held a retention election in which the ballot would offer an up or down vote on retaining O in office, he would be defeated in all but the most whacked states (yes, Maryland is one of them).

      The problem is that an election boils down to a choice between two individuals. The media is prepared to make our eventual nominee even more polarizing than Obama. This is how Dingy reid got reelected with a 35% approval rating. We must be ready with a nominee who has the tenacity to withstand the onslaught and stay on message; health care, high gas and food prices, ass backwards foreign policy…

      • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

        Can’t find you. If you’re there, please add the follow-me to your RS signature.

    • freemanja1991

      Brown had over 7 mill in the bank after his election and from what i hear all the potential challengers had to spend too much to keep their jobs in 2010.

    • unclefred

      It would be nice to believe that he can find a way to win, but I don’t see it. Other than his reversal on DADT I can’t say I’m surprised by his voting record. He did not run as a conservative, he ran as a business friendly, anti-Obamacare, moderate. Unfortunately his core voters expected more and many of his more vocal supporters have gone silent.

      It is very difficult to elect a republican to state wide office in Mass. For a republican the Senate is a tougher race than Governor there. The democrat machine was a bit asleep in early 2010. Brown came out of nowhere and rode a national grassroots wave of support and money to win. By November 2010 the machine was wide awake. The mass republicans, despite the best polling numbers in at least 30 years, got waxed throughout the state. The democratic machine delivered seats in districts where the democrat was polling at -5 or worse.

      About the most we can hope is that Brown’s war chest will force the left to spend a lot of money in Mass. to win a seat that is usually a cake wake.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    …the GOP is quaking in their loafers at the thought of aggressively cutting spending and being called big meanies by the Dems, MSM, and assorted Lefties. NOW is the time to strike while the iron is hot and people are boiling over debt and spending.

  • jeremyz

    With his recent foray into the Wisconsin budget/union debate and with the DOJ’s abandoning DOMA one can see that Obama knows he is in trouble and is losing the center. It appears he is beginning to rally his base and hope it can cover the difference in those centrist voters he has already lost and will lose. I do however agree with the above sentiments about professor Barry.

    In spite of the obvious shift in the mood of the country, one billion dollars in campaign funds + bought and paid for MSM + union malfeasance + BHO’s melodious tones + a poor Republican nominee could still equal a second term, even if just barely. It is going to be a very interesting 21 months.

  • macjedi

    Real Americans love greatness. The lofty calling of American ideals persists for even those in this great Nation with a diminished and confused sense of American destiny. The real greatness of American Presidents comes out when they unite and encourage the Nation. Particularly so in bad times. This does not happen to every President, and not everyone who has held the office was able to realize greatness. But when events are aligned with determined character and inspiration, there Americans rise to the calling.

    While the worst President in living memory WAS Jimmy Carter, his bumbling malaise bears no comparison to the not yet complete track record of Obama. The malignant progressivism of Obama is the new Blitzkrieg of American politics. While the current occupant of the White House dreams of achieving significance, he has divided the nation in a way we have only read about in the history of our Civil War. If we survive The Great Divider, the need for reconstruction (morally, socially, economically) will be severe.

    God have Mercy on us.

  • lepelerin

    to beat this incumbant. I don’t see one willing to run, yet. Besides all we need is a 3rd party candidate who spouts some of the right things, to give Barry four more years.

    • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

      like Deval Patrick had in MA with Tim Cahill in the MA Governor’s race. That third party candidate would have to raise or have a lot of money to compete at the presidential level. If Bloomberg ran he would take votes from Obama. Trump is the one I worry about if he went independent or third party.

      As far as the current field of Presidential candidates in the GOP is concerned it is way to early to short change them. Presidential campaigns are dynamic in nature and someone will step it up. We all know that directly challenging Obama’s record and policies is the formula to beating Obama. Chris Christie, Jan Brewer and Scott Walker have benefited big time from taking on Obama and his public employee unions. Let’s not forget McCain ran a timid campaign against Obama because he didn’t want to be called a racist. Wimpy and congenial is not the campaign style conservatives are looking for this year.

    • graciegirl

      more badly than in generations and we don’t have a well-rounded candidate who wants it.

      I respect Mike Pence for letting us know but DANG! I swear he was the one. No pun intended.

      I don’t know if we can survive another four years of Barry.

      • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH
      • gekster

        it will give the MSM a lot of time to demonise them.
        I hope they hold out until the last minute, like in the old days.
        Wait till November or December the year before the election.
        Last election cycle for the President, Hillary and some others proclaimed thier run just after the 2006 midterms, and Repubs felt they had to do the same.
        The later the announcement, the less time to be demonised.

        • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

          It won’t be much longer now before the formal announcements are going to happen. We already have the candidates who are no doubt running speaking at the Lincoln Reagan dinners for the Republican County and City Committees here in NH already.

        • graciegirl

          or are you saying that other qualified candidates are still sitting on the sidelines? and yes agree that announcing too early can be a big mistake.

          Everyone I know who is analyzing the possibles are not coming up with anyone. All are tired of the old guard and the young guns don’t seem to be ready yet. Wow slate coming up are many and impressive: Ryan, Jindal, Rubio, Walker? Rand Paul? Nikki Haley? all said to be leaders in training. (Don’t agree with Christie so leaving him out.)

          But who is ready Now? when we need him the most?

          • gekster

            What I am trying to say that it would be prudent to wait until late in this year to announce.
            I remember a time when the early announcements came in October.

            I rule no one in at this time, but I rule no one out either.
            And for an example, just the thought of a Palin run has the left and MSM still trasher her for no reason other than she”might” run.
            The longer they wait, the less time to be trashed.

          • graciegirl
  • victrola

    If you’ve played around with the 2012 map since redistricting, Obama really does have to draw a Royal Flush to win. He has to carry all the true swing states, whereas a Republican only has to peel one off to win.

    My guess is the results in 2012 will look like 2004, with it coming down to Ohio.

    • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

      Ohio Redstaters are looking at the Precinct Project. GOTV in Ohio and Florida is going to be critical in 2012.

  • Adjoran

    This time in 1995 it looked like Clinton was dead in the water, too.

    Now, Clinton did have some advantages Obama lacks: he was truly pragmatic and willing to cave on popular Republican initiatives in order to take some of the credit, he was a much slicker pol and able to play the game with the shutdown and triangulation to make Republicans look extreme, and he got the benefit of policies enacted by a GOP Congress like capital gains cuts and deficit reductions to stimulate the economy and markets.

    Having Reid in charge of the Senate negates much of the Clinton strategy – the Democrats control 2/3 of government, so it’s harder blame the Republicans for the shutdown if it happens, and the Senate will block the best ideas and sound budgeting put forth by the House, so Obama can’t benefit.

    But still, it’s way too early to chill the champagne.

    • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

      If McCain/Palin did anything, it broke a fifty year cycle of having a Nixon, Dole or Bush on the ticket.

      This is where Govs. Huckabee and Romney face a hurdle to overcome.

  • steelpier1

    this administration that doesn’t spit in the face of the opinion of at least 60% of the American people. Everything the Kenyan Kommie does is, obviously, an attempt to shove something down the throats of the people; from Arizona, to energy, to homosexual marraige, to HEALTH CARE DESTRUCTION,-everything. How can he have a 50% approval anywhere?

    • graciegirl

      I am finding more people than ever who are pitifully uninformed. They are not junkies like us. Have you ever seen those man on the street interviews? Seriously, even if people know WHO is leading our country they are not following the policies. They do not know WHAT they are voting for.

      I would bet anything they would disagree vehemently on at least a few issues if they only knew the details of how O is running over us.

      It’s everywhere! People in my family refuse to watch the news because it’s depressing; people in my bookclub and neighborhood: discussion of politics are not polite. These are educated people! The local Tea Party is the only place I can talk the truth.

      BTW I live in a red county in a red state!

      I know the conventional wisdom is that people are getting more involved but…this is what I am experiencing.

      • carolina

        only people that I can talk to also. I find many people who still ‘believe’ that voting for the democrats makes them ‘good people’ who care about the ‘poor’.
        Many people just don’t pay attention to politics and only see the clips on the national news (like NBC’s smirk about Walker’s hoax call from a Koch – that was on last night. It made me want to scream)
        2010 gave me hope, but a Presidential election year will bring out a lot more of the uninformed.

        • lineholder

          I run into the same thing. Not all that long ago I had a conversation with a young co-worker who was adamant in his belief that our government’s social programs were the ultimate answer to our nation’s problems.

          After getting into conversation, I was able to point out how the programs aren’t perfect by any stretch of the imagination. They are very much so flawed and not in favor of individual citizens either.

          This young man has since moved on to another company, but I saw him last week. He said that he’s been reviewing a lot of the government programs, doesn’t like what he sees, and is beginning to understand why conservatives have the objections that we do have.

          We’ve got a lot of opportunities out there right now to let people know what the truth is.

          • rightwingmom52

            Occasionally, somebody will ask me how I know this or that. I tell them I read a lot, especially RS.

  • Tbone

    Remember, a big percentage of 90% of 11% of the adults support Obama primarily because he is black. You take that 90% and adjust out the racist factor and I bet Obama is under 50% in several more states among non-racist adults.

  • cam1

    an academic who is so ideologically ingrained to hate all that is neo-colonialist, socially unjust and Constitutionally bound that even the msm can’t hide who this radical progressive is.