« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Now is the Time to Pass an ANWR Bill

It's time to launch a counter-offensive and end the Democrats' war on oil once and for all.

In 1995, the Republican-controlled House and Senate passed a balanced budget act, which contained a provision to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for oil drilling and exploration.  On December 6th of that year, President Bill Clinton vetoed the bill, ensuring that not a drop of oil would be extracted from the barren land of this 20 million acre area.  We have literally been paying for this veto for the past 15 years.

This gargantuan frozen tundra in the northeast corner of Alaska contains the most oil of any single untapped source within the borders of the U.S.  According to the mean average estimate of the U.S. Geological Survey, there are at least 10.3 billion barrels of oil in ANWR.  Most of this oil can be tapped through a drilling imprint of just 2,000 acres, or .01%, of the reserve area.  In addition, there is an estimated 35 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in ANWR.  Only an insidious gang of politicians hell-bent on undermining our national security, economic prosperity, and free market capitalism, could be so intransigent to impound this treasure from the American people.

Yet, for the past 15 years, a truculent group of Democrats, along with a handful of liberal Republicans in the Senate, has prevented another ANWR bill from making its way to the president’s desk.  Now, with Obama behind the desk, he has promised to block any effort to drill in ANWR, the Outer Continental Shelf, the Rockies, and much of the Gulf coast.  It is high time that we issue a direct challenge to Obama and quell his war on energy independence and productivity.

In 2006, Mike Pence suggested that the Republicans in the House pass an ANWR bill every week.  Now that the GOP is in charge of that body, they should immediately fast track a bill to unlock this barren land of energy bounty and bring it to an ‘up or down vote’ under a closed rule on the House floor.  Let the Democrats stand before the American people at a time when a lack of oil and gas has inflated the cost of gasoline, electricity, food, and many vital products that must be transported at a gratuitously high price.  Let them regurgitate their fatuous lies about the reproductive life of the caribou while their constituents are languishing from the high energy prices that they have so blithely promoted.  Ultimately, we have the votes to crush their resistance anyway.

What about the Senate and President Obama?  Well, the Senate Democrats are confronted with potentially their worst election cycle in modern history.  They must defend 23 seats in 2012, eight being in Bush red states and a bunch more in critical swing states that can easily flip.  The Republicans, on the other hand, will only face serious challenges in one or two states.  In addition, there are several other senators who aren’t up for election in 2012, but have publicly declared their support for increased oil drilling.  Alaska Democrat Mark Begich is one of the staunchest supporters of ANWR, a clear reflection of its popularity back home among Alaskans and local lawmakers.  The people of Alaska are rightly looking at North Dakota and its diminutive 3.9% unemployment rate with envy.

Let’s call their bluff and hang ANWR around their necks as a political albatross for the 2012 elections.  Mitch McConnell needs to force an up or down vote on ANWR, much like he did with ObamaCare.  With gasoline and utility prices soaring, we’ll see if Democrats have the same bravado to embrace the true label of “the party of no”.

Democrats will undoubtedly reiterate their ignorance of market forces by declaring ANWR to be but a drop in the bucket, an inconsequential solution to high energy prices.  The American people are all too painfully aware of how slight fluctuations in supply and demand in a tight market can seriously affect the price at the pump.  Libya exported approximately 1.5 million barrels per day before the start of their civil war, and yet the cessation of that production alone has induced one of the most precipitous spikes in oil prices in recent memory.  If Democrats would cease their bondage over ANWR, we would have the ability to pump 1.5 million barrels per day for the next 20 years.  The commencement of the drilling operation alone would have an immediate effect on gas prices in such a sensitive market.

Furthermore, we have seen the ‘experts’ underestimate the size of oil reserves throughout the world on a regular basis.  Last year, The Heritage Foundation observed that the Department of Energy keeps revising their estimate of oil reserves upwards on an annual basis.  The reality is that new technologies and innovation in drilling and exploration have resulted in more oil discoveries and better efficiency in its extraction.  Sadly, the Democrats are too scared of being proven wrong to acquiesce to a drilling revolution.  They also fear that unlike their impotent energy sources of wind, solar, ethanol, grass, and woodchips, oil and gas exploration would actually stave off a reality of European style gas prices.

ANWR should be the first salvo in our counteroffensive against the Democrats’ war on oil.  We must eventually fight for expanded drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), the fifty states, and the Gulf of Mexico.  It’s time for Republicans to launch a full scale assault on the energy hostage takers within the government.  Fifteen years of holding our oil and gas exploration hostage is enough.

We are fighting for energy independence, job creation, national security, and the American way of life.  Oil is a gift from God and is the bloodline of our economic freedom and prosperity .  Republicans need to muster the courage to pass ANWR immediately.  The American people are supporting us on this issue.  If the Democrats continue to obstruct our energy development, we need to sever their bloodline in 2012; political power.

Cross-posted to Red Meat Conservative

COMMENTS

  • Darin_H

    16 years ago, one of the complaints was that it would take 10 years to get the oil. It sure would have been nice to start pumping that 6 years ago.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      has been one of the Dems main arguments against it, even as their opposition to drilling has overshot their own arbitrary time-frame for “benefiting” from oil exploration. The truth is that in this sensitive speculative market- just the mere threat to get serious about drilling would have a depressing effect on market prices.

      • Darin_H

        At the least it will force speculators to reevaluate betting on future higher prices, which brings down the price today.

    • not_neo_just_conservative

      10 years is a talking point. I’m guessing drilling to delivery would be less than half that. Vladimir could answer that better than I can as I’m primarily involved in the pipeline construction portion of the equation.

      Constructing the pipeline is a matter of how many people you want to throw at it.

      Assuming that you built a completely new pipeline rather than using existing infrastructure for at least portions of the work, you’ve got maybe a 3500 mile 42-inch diameter pipeline to the terminal at Cushing, Oklahoma.

      That’s between 35 and 60 construction spreads. Between the US and Canada, there’s probably 40 total spreads, not all capable of handling big-inch pipe. Assume 20 capable and available spreads, by my math that’s two to three years to build the pipeline. Most of that can take place while the oilfields are being developed and the extra storage capacity is constructed at the terminal(s).

      5 years is my guess, provided the Sierra Club doesn’t spend a decade throwing lawsuits up against the project.

      • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

        They just need pipeline to wherever they can connect to the TransAlaska Pipeline.

        There’s probably 5 years of leasing and permitting in the 10 year estimate.

        • not_neo_just_conservative

          I used a new pipeline to Cushing as a worst case. I also didn’t know if the TransAlaska pipeline has the excess capacity but alluded to it and other existing large diameter pipelines as “existing infrastructure.”

          I would think that in the case of an emergency that the leasing and permitting process could be radically accelerated, though we are dealing with the federal government, which seems to have permanently displaced its sense of urgency with regard to energy policy.

          • Raven

            And, iirc, it only took 3 years to build the entire pipeline the first time.
            Which can be done simultaneously with getting started on the drilling.

          • dave2131

            could finally say (truthfully) that they actually created jobs – I assume somebody would be hired to work on this project!

          • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

            That’s why wackos fight new North Slope production so hard.

            They want the pipeline removed.

          • not_neo_just_conservative

            It was called the Millennium Pipeline because it was supposed to be built in 2000. After all the lawsuits were taken care of, they started clearing right-of-way in 2007 and finished reseeding the right-of-way in 2008.

            Seven years of litigation, two years of construction.

      • Darin_H

        and another 7 for litigation/feet dragging environnuts.

        • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

          The AlCan Highway was built in 1 summer in WWII.

          It all depends whether you’re in “National Emergency” mode.

          • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

            others have mentioned, the Democrats are asserting their own self fulfilling obstructionism when they mention the 10 year time frame. They have enough friends in the environmental legal defense business to deter any drilling company from getting started.

          • flannery

            There is no Constitutional right to obstruct on environmental grounds, its all legislative. Just include a litigation exemption provision and a streamlined bullet point permitting process in the drilling legislation. No basis for Sierra et al to even get into court.

        • not_neo_just_conservative

          Darin,

          Look up. the comment right above yours was meant in reply to your comment. I clicked the wrong button…

      • dwain

        The seirra,audobon,etc.are one of the most if not the most to blame for our energy problems today.They use mis information and out right lies to promote their agenda and it isn;t only the oil industry but many other industries as well that they impact.
        It would be enteresting to know how much their agenda costs every family in the US.If people realy knew I think there would be enough of the silent majority finaly stand up and realize what this vocal minority is doing to them.
        Here in TX they tried to stop a wind farm because they said it might kill birds.These clubs are anti-progress!!

  • blownawayin5

    …and AMEN!! This is a GREAT way to shine the spotlight on the idiotic Democrat (lack of) energy policy. I’d add language as well to open up the continental shelves and mandate manifiest and robust streamlining of the permitting process, starting with the permits inhouse for drilling in the Gulf.

  • http://www.twitter.com/RS_yoyo yoyo

    Shoot, it could even be broken.

    But just imagine all the bits lying around the staffers offices of each Senator/Rep. I bet that I have about 150 of the things lying around (in storage, back of the tool box, under the garage cabinets, in my shop) and those are just the ones I do not use.

    Drop one in an envelope, attached to a note saying, “Drill, baby, drill!” and attach a stamp.

    • acat

      http://www.acehardware.com/product/index.jsp?productId=1293716

      You can also order online.

      Mew

      • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

        Sounds like a good idea, although I would hate to waste money on postage to send something to a Dem.

        • acat

          Well, other than the yearly fee .. but I’d spend more than that since most birthday and christmas gifts come from Amazon wish lists… (I’ve got the dozen nieces and nephews trained…)

          It’s not a new idea, by the way. This guy Erick suggested something similar…

          http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/10/13/pour-rock-salt-on-snowe/

          Mew

  • johnt

    Come on, this is what Democrats live for. After years of beating around the bushes, now with a graduate of the Reverend Wright/Ayers School of American Studies they’re in a position to inflict real and total suffering. It’s positively orgasmic !
    You may yet hear the “even if we start now” refrain, an oldie but goodie golden hit.
    Meanwhile LittleLiberals hate us more then ever.

  • edintexas

    Libya is just an excuse. The Saudis have already committed to increasing their daily release to cover the amount of oil Libya was producing daily. The MSM producing stories exclusively blaming Libya provides cover to Dear Leader, but his devastation of the US oil business is a far greater factor.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    and mandating that he lift his moratorium or face possible unspecified penalties for acting in total contempt of the law. Then, after he vetos the bill, impeach impeach him for ignoring the court ruling against his self imposed moratorium and be rid of him.

    • baserunr

      with the removal of federally-sanctioned standing for Enviro groups, you could speed up the entire process by years. Environuts only get to sue because the government gave them special standing that they did not otherwise have. That standing needs to be revoked.

      • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

        is definitely one of the biggest problems facing increased oil exploration, as well as construction of oil refineries. I just think that we should start the battle with a clean up or down bill on ANWR so the Dems can’t play games with the details. These issues should be dealt with in phase 2.

  • Castor

    THE GULF + THE UTICA SHALE IN NORTHEAST OHIO + OFFSHORE IN THE PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC + NUCLEAR + MORE COAL PERMITS +
    NATURAL GAS = ENERGY INDEPENDENCE.

    DRILL FOR THE KILL !!!!!!

  • drfredc

    Yep… it’s time to draw a line in the tundra, on one side, you’ve got the Blue plan for $5 gas, exporting billions of dollars in gas money to oil despots that could be used to get private sector jobs going while we’re stuck on stupid with unsustainable Blue jobs and benefits. On the other side, there’s the Red plan for $3 gas with gas money kept at home to support jobs of every color. That’s a no brainer.

    I’m surprised none of the GOP Presidential candidates have made sure that the oil & gas guys have their applications for drilling ready the first day of my term… The first executive order should declare a national emergency to get drilling at home done NOW so we can create jobs and keep our money at home — and oh yeah, the EPA works for the Pres and it’s time to shut up and sit down…

    While futilely waiting for GOP leadership to step forth, in the meantime, the GOP House ought to propose a resolution declaring the “Bill of Lefts”. The resolution isn’t about “rights”, but rather the BO_Lefts is the core of the Left’s playbook, out in the open — open for debate so that more folks recognize and understand the nonsense that is the Bill of Lefts playbook and how it’s totally screwed up our nation and it’s otherwise decent moral fiber.

    It would be wildly entertaining and instructive to watch the Left attempt to debate and amend it’s own tactical playbook… Meanwhile, the Tea Party can provide example upon example of how the Left have used and continue to use, it’s BOL to screw up our nation.

    Might as well get it down on paper so everyone knows what the Left’s fiscal and moral bankrupt goals are…. It will make future business so much easier as one just needs look to the BOL to see how the left justifies it’s position on any issue. While the GOP can cite the Constitutional basis for it’s legislation, the Left could just refer to the Bill of Lefts to define it’s actions…

    For example, perpetual Funemployment, is supported by Article 1, 2, 3, 4 & 6 —

    1) Thou shall be secure in the fact government will take care of you. Everything is free as long as you don’t work for it. So you are best off not working at all or as little as possible.”

    2) Government shall never take away anything it gives you. However, it may take away anything you earn on your own.

    3) There shall be plenty of mandates on the other guy. You are safe as long as you choose do as little as possible — then government will not ask you to do anything in return. Whatever you do, don’t ever think about employing someone. If you do hire a maid, best not to report it.

    4) Bubbas who hang out together can get most anything they want as long as they promise to vote for incumbent liberals. .

    6) Deficits are a part of life, but that is only a problem for those with money. If the government gives you a credit card for health care or anything, use it as much as you want. The more you use it, the more free things you can expect to get with it in the future.

    And so on…. Any questions?

  • 1689

    Open the whole state for God’s sake.

    Alaska is huge: It’s just about 4 times the size of California! (591000 square miles versus 158,000 square miles)

    Alaska is empty — of people: Guess how many people are in California? 38 Million. Guess how many million people are in Alaska? ZERO! (The population is 700,000).

    So let’s me get this straight: So it’s huge and [expletive] EMPTY, especially of people! And we can’t touch it? So that it can be a vast, empty desolate critter paradise? Caribou la-la land. We can have no increased oil production in a state with 2% of California’s population, and whose land area is four times that of California.

    How stupid can can an entire political party & movement be? How stupid can their leaders be? The Answer: If you’re a democrat you can be an imbecile & insane and yet — in one of the perverse twisted mysteries of life — still have power & authority over formerly free/formerly energy-independent Americans.

    It’s ok, stay calm. Say to yourself: we actually enjoy sending billions and billions, and billions more, to all the Allah nutjobs in the Middle East.

  • http://www.reddit.com/user/pi_over_three/ Pi Over Three

    What a great phrase.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      lower and middle income workers as well. It really is a war on modern life since 1859. Oil IS the modern world.

  • Maggie_in_Indiana

    to make a difference. The environment will be devastated. It’s too far away. It will take too long to get oil out of the ground.

    bla bla bla. Well Which is it. If we had been drilling there our supplies from countries would have diminished. If we drilled with new technology the environmental impact would be minimal. The pipeline has been in use and a success for years. and there is little or no wildlife to speak of anywhere near the would-be drill site.
    We have all seen the pictures of Anwar, the coverage by multiple congressmen and Senators of both parties on youtube, so what’s the deal? The left wants to go green. More bla bla bla. Time to get out my Drill Baby Drill tee, and get this back on the radio and the blogs ….again.
    BTW, thanks for the post, ya gotta start somewhere.

  • seisner01

    It?s time to let the dogs out! Let?s take a lesson from our own history ?how Reagan won the Cold War. Essentially, it was an economic victory as opposed to a military or ideological victory. We ran the Soviet economic engine into the ground.

    Now, we are faced with a myriad of enemies whose sole source of economic and political power is that they happen to live above huge oil reserves. The Soviets had technology, military might, a solid manufacturing infrastructure, abundant resource and a wellspring of intellectual capabilities that rivaled and in some areas exceeded our own, but the configuration of their economic engine doomed them to failure against a Capitalist machine ? it inherently just could not compete in a flat-out competition. Reagan proved this to them and, seeing the light of reason, they backed down to avoid all-out disaster.

    Our current crop of enemies have far less to work with ?, their infrastructure, their military capabilities, their ability to cling to power are all dependent on one simple factor ? their control of vast oil reserves. So it would seem obvious even to the casual student of history that this one source of power and control is also their Achilles Heel. If we are to prevail and defeat them, this is where they are most vulnerable.

    Traditionally, they have wielded power on the international stage by controlling the supply of oil as we (the West) have come to them ?hat in hand? with gifts of technology, food, infrastructure projects, cash, ? you name it, in order to ?persuade? them to keep the pumps open. As anyone who drives a car can see, this philosophy is about to explode in our faces ? unless we react quickly. How do we accomplish this?

    It seems that the obvious and easiest way to attack the source of our enemy?s is, simply, to flood the world marketplace with oil and other energy sources!!! The United States alone (not even counting the vast resources of western countries like Canada) sits on top of HUGE sources of energy ? billions and billions of barrels of oil, trillions of cubic feet of natural gas, billions of tons of coal ? unknown billions of barrels of off-shore oil ? According to the mean average estimate of the U.S. Geological Survey, there are at least 10.3 billion barrels of oil in ANWR (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Most of this oil can be tapped through a drilling imprint of just 2,000 acres, or .01%, of the reserve area. In addition, there is an estimated 35 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in ANWR alone (as stated it the above article). yet for a variety of reasons, we have not taken advantage of this ? political reasons disguised as ?concerns? for the environment have obscured the real challenges with which we have to deal with. IT?S TIME TO LET THE DOGS OUT!!!.

    What does that mean??? Let?s let the energy companies loose ? let?s help them, subsidize them, partner with them, support the quest for cheap oil sources, help them realize huge profits and tax them, let?s take off the gloves ? LET?S FLOOD THE WORLD MARKETS WITH OIL AND OTHER ENERGY SOURCES ? let?s break our Middle East enemy?s economically by taking away the one advantage they have!!!! Let?s make their oil worth a fraction of what is worth today to the point where it is they who must come to us ?hat in hand?.

    A ?small? peripheral benefit would be, through taxes on what would be vast profits and government/industry partnerships, to reduce or perhaps even eliminate our national debt! Another lesson from history can be seen from the ?Dot Com? era. Did the vast surpluses of money that flowed into our government coffers in the 90?s come from Bill Clinton?s economic brilliance, or was it the natural result of taxes being levied on vast new sources of income? Does anyone remember how low unemployment was during that time as well?

    It seems that letting the ?energy dogs? loose might just prove to be our salvation.

  • rowdydfw

    You starve it.

    Funding the Middle East oil cartels is just not good policy. Sorry to offend those who get their little sensitivities in a wad over what they consider extreme, BUT it is an INSANE policy!

    When your own oil dollar is funding terrorism and giving the Islamo-fascist in the Middle East more power to wield against your interests, the only thing that makes sense is to STOP IT! It was insane policy to begin with, built on communist policy to keep Americans from being strong and well off. And it’s time to starve the beast and send it back to dwelling in their cave hidey holes like the barbarians they have been for 1379 years.

    Producing our own fuel should be #1 priority for Americans. We need those oil dollars spent in the US making strong, happy, and productive American families.

    • adair

      10:30 a.m. Central Time.

      No trolls yet.

      Comments by several people who know what they’re talking about.

      A really instructive article, really instructive comments.

      We shoulda listened to Mike Pence in 2006.

  • lizaz

    I lived in AK for 50 years. When the trans-Alaska pipeline was built, the impact was akin to laying a piece of string on the grass in your 8-acre back yard. The caribou and polar bears continue to abound and the technology exists for a minimum alteration of the environment on a tiny portion of ANWR required for exploration/drilling. The “it will take 10 years to get the oil out” argument is just a bunch of baloney. The crude can be transported by a spur pipeline to Prudhoe Bay to connect with the existing line to the Port of Valdez. As we continue to pay more and more for our gasoline/diesel, Obama and his ilk get theirs free, on the taxpayer. The prices of all of the products we consume are affected by the price of fuel and will continue to rise. We know Obama is fearful of losing the environmental (left) vote, so oil production anywhere in the U.S. is curtailed on our backs. If this situation continues into 2012, I believe Americans will realize they are being used to perpetuate the Obama political empire as they fuel their vehicles with $5 or more per gallon gas on their way to the polls. Let us hope we can retaliate and “use” this issue to defeat the destructive administration which was created by a “community organizer”. We have had enough!!!