« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

GAO Report: Limited Control Over our Own Border

A nation with no borders is not a nation at all. Sadly, that is exactly what Obama wants.

Obama has no problem ignoring Congress to use our military on behalf of Al-Qaeda backed rebels in a country that has no interest to our security.  Yet, he eagerly abdicates his core constitutional responsibility to protect our own border and sovereignty.

On Wednesday, Richard M. Stana, director of homeland security issues at the Government Accountability Office, testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security regarding the status of our border security.  His 28 page report paints a grim picture and exposes the vulnerability of our border.  Here are some of the key findings:

  • Of the 1,825-mile U.S.-Mexico border, only 129 miles, or 7%, are fully secure.  There are another 744 miles in which the border patrol has established “an acceptable level of control.”
  • Of the 3,918-mile northern border, only 2 miles are fully secure, while another 69 miles have “an acceptable level of control.”
  • In 2010, $11.9 billion was appropriated for our overall border security.  Just $3.9 billion was appropriated for border security efforts between points of entry.

In case you are confused about the distinction between the fully secure areas and the “acceptable” ones, the Border Patrol offers the following classification.  The 129 most secure miles of the Mexican border are the ones in which CBP has “the ability to deter or detect and apprehend illegal entries at the immediate border”.  An “acceptable level of control” (744 miles, in this case) is established when CPB is able to apprehend illegals after they have entered U.S. soil to “distances of up to 100 miles or more away from the immediate border.”

The fact that the Border Patrol, for the most part, can only detect illegal entry after they are deep into U.S. territory is extremely troublesome.  In a sane world, we would be deporting those illegals who were apprehended even after the point of entry.  Sadly, the Obama administration has granted amnesty by administrative fiat, thus rendering any deterrent capability ineffective.  As long as illegals entrants are able to penetrate the border, they have an excellent chance of remaining in the country indefinitely.  This is because Obama and Napolitano have ordered CPB to focus exclusively on violent illegals.  Earlier this week, Obama told an illegal alien student that he will ostensibly never deport non-criminal aliens:

“We have redesigned our enforcement practices under the law to make sure that we’re focusing primarily on criminals, and so our deportation of criminals are up about 70 percent. Our deportation of non-criminals are down, and that’s because we want to focus our resources on those folks who are destructive to the community. “And for a young person like that young woman that we just spoke to who’s going to school, doing all the right things, we want them to succeed.”  (emphasis added)

So Obama is admitting that he is knowingly disregarding a core responsibility of his presidency.  He is also making it clear that once illegals are able to penetrate the border, they will remain in the country, irrespective of the dedicated and courageous efforts of our border agents.  As long as they enter through the right 93% of the border, their claims on our welfare state will be irrevocable.

We are currently spending just $3.9 billion a year on the border patrol, one of the most fundamental responsibilities of government.  Yet, we already spent over $500 million in one week fighting alongside Al-Qaeda in Libya!

Unfortunately, our border crisis is not an appropriations problem.  It is an administrative problem.  Much like Obama’s bureaucratic power grab over the internet, health care, environmental regulations, and labor laws; he has used the power of unelected officials to undermine our immigration laws.  In each case, he has supplanted the authority of Congress and thwarted the will of the people in an effort to implement a radical agenda.

Maybe President Obama will teach Chuck Schumer the true definition of extremism.

Cross-posted to Red Meat Conservative

COMMENTS

  • spainishirish

    His biggest supporters even refer to Obama as a “post-American” president. He ventured into the Libyan insanity, in part, because it would prove the United States will subordinate its national security interests to the United Nations, EU, Arab League, whatever. A border is not permitted when you are rapidly dismantling national sovereignty. We had many on our side who subscribed, at least once, to the Wall Street Journal vision of open borders. They now know who their real allies are,/were and they hardly have the United States’ best interests in mind.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      It is indeed quite disturbing that too many on “our side” buy into the open borders nonsense.

  • victrola

    Why on Earth does South Korea get to have their border patrolled by the United States military, but American citizens can’t have there’s protected?

    You could easily lock the border down (from people sneaking in) it’s not a logistics issue, it’s a political one.

    Republicans should make militarizing the border part of their platform, you’d be amazed how many Americans would back such a proposal. Do you know how many blue collar, Reagan Democrats would swoon to such a stance?

    Republicans need to stop being so scared of being called racist for wanting to protect the border, it’s a winning political position, and even Democrats are starting to try and talk tough on the border.

  • bushhog

    we need to redirect a portion (it will be a fairly small one) of the money spent providing social services to illegals. Apply it to border security measures and enforcement of existing law and we have immediate relief to both state and federal budgets. Internal enforcement will result in self-deportation; border enforcement will prevent repetition of the problem.

  • rwolf

    Pay U.S. Border Patrol Officers rewards, a bonus for each illegal immigrant they arrest crossing sections of the U.S. border designated as most unprotected. Reward Incentives would cause thousands of U.S. Border Patrol Officers to constantly expose publicly, U.S. Border Patrol Policies designed that hide the fact thousands of miles of U.S. borders are not protected, allowing countless illegal immigrants to enter American and potential terrorists to enter America. Reward bonuses paid Border Patrol Officers would create an incentive for Border Patrol officers to arrest corrupt U.S. Border Patrol that take bribes to allow illegal immigrants to cross the U.S. Border.