« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

When Will the Real Fight Finally Commence?

There is no time like the present.

Over the weekend, Speaker John Boehner showed that he is even more conservative than the Tea Party.  While the petulant rubes in the Tea Party were credulously focusing on the ‘small potatoes’ of the 2011 budget, Boehner wisely decided to proceed to the real fight; the debt ceiling and the FY 2012 budget.  In the process, he even secured $38 billion, or 1%, in cuts from this year’s budget, along with the funding for a D.C. voucher program.

In addition to being an intrepid conservative and a tenacious negotiator, Boehner is also a skilled mathematician.  He knew from the very beginning that 38 billion is more than half way between 0 and 61 billion.  Game over, Democrats lose!  Even though half of the alleged cuts might comprise of Democrat cuts in mandatory spending, and another $10 billion might include the previous CR cuts, those are just minor points.

At this point, you may ask, what happened to those pesky little riders, like defunding Obamacare and EPA regulations; those little things that will cost the taxpayer, consumer, businesses, and healthcare providers trillions – if not billions – in expenditures over the next decade?  You might wonder, what happened to the defunding of Planned Parenthood, preventing our tax money from killing babies?  You might be perplexed concerning the absence of the NPR rider, preventing our tax money from servicing Democrats’ public relations effort.

Fear not, simpletons.  This is where Boehner really beguiled Reid and the Democrats.  He forced Reid to bring two of four riders – Obamacare and Planned Parenthood – to an actual vote on the Democrat-controlled Senate floor!  Besides, Boehner is presciently saving his firepower for the real battle, the debt ceiling fight.

Now let’s travel in a time machine and attempt to ascertain the outcome of the real big fight in the future:

May 10-May 31 2011:  The debt ceiling of $14.294 trillion is imminently approaching.  The Democrats continue to propagate the fallacious warning of a default on our credit.  They turn to the airwaves to accuse Republicans of not only forcing a government shutdown, but a shutdown of our nation.  Republicans once again begin by promising robust transformational changes.  They propose an awesome Balanced Budget Amendment as a concession for raising the debt limit.

The amendment would force Congress to pass a balanced budget; the President to submit a balanced budget; the capping of spending at 18% of GDP; a 2/3ds supermajority to raise taxes; and a 3/5ths supermajority to raise the debt ceiling.

In addition to the balanced budget demand, Eric Cantor threatens to tie Medicare and Medicaid reform to the debt ceiling deal.  As the final hours wind down, Democrats denounce Republicans as attacking every civilian constituency in the country with more ferocity than Al-Qaeda.  They assert that hell will freeze over before they agree to any one of those concessions.

As the impasse reaches its breaking point, does anybody really believe that the GOP would commit to any meaningful and transformational vitiation of Democrats’ livelihood, forcing a shutdown?  They have already communicated to the Democrats in a very inconspicuous manner that they will never force a shutdown by interjecting policy into a budget impasse.

However, fear not folks, the real real fight is Paul Ryan’s blockbuster FY 2012 budget, which will cut $6.2 trillion, eliminate Obamacare, and totally reform the welfare state.  That is where we should expend our political capital.

Once again, let’s jump back into our time machine:

Late September 2011:  Let’s assume that Ryan’s budget easily passes the full House over the summer appropriations process with its full glory intact.  By late September, the Senate has still not passed a budget.  As the final days of FY 2011 tick down, Democrats launch a multi-million dollar ad blitz portraying Republicans as devious killers of women, children, seniors, the sick, the disabled, the unemployed, and the mentally ill.  Paul Ryan is denounced as worse than Hitler, or even Bush.

If Republicans failed to go to the mat for defunding Obamacare in April, will they really have the temerity to force a government shutdown on October 1st over Obamacare, along with reform of Medicaid, Medicare, green energy, and hundreds of billions in cuts from Democrat special interest groups?

Okay, okay, I give up.  Republicans cannot force transformational change before the 2012 elections.  After all, they only control “one half of 1/3rd of government”.  We can only chip around the edges for now.  But just you wait until 2012 when we win the presidency and the Senate.  We will really stick it to them then.

Back in the time machine:

February 2013:  Republicans win the White House, and due to the favorable electoral landscape, they win 53-56 seats in the Senate and preserve their House majority.  On day one, the House passes repeal of Obamacare lock, stock and barrel; while President Pawlenty/Gingrich/Barbour promises to sign it immediately.  Feisty conservative warriors like Mitch McConnell and Lamar Alexander quickly bring the repeal bill to the Senate floor.  Then…..an ever truculent group of 41+ Democrat Senators filibuster the bill to the bitter end!

We must realize that whether we ultimately secure 61, 38, or 28 billion in cuts, they are all insignificant and well below the original Republican promise.  The real 800 pound gorilla in the deal is Obamacare.  The cost of that demon is incalculable and almost infinite.

The bottom line is that we will never control all branches of government enough to repeal Obamacare before it become immutable, if ever.  It is highly unlikely that we will win 60 seats in the Senate.  Even if we did, there is no guarantee that senators like Brown, Murkowski, Collins, and Snowe will accede to full repeal.  They might be able to use budget reconciliation, but Republicans have already declared that they fear political reprisal from any attempt to push policy through budget fights.  A Republican president can conceivably halt implementation through an Executive Order.  However, by that time, much of its effects would have come to fruition.  Will Republicans have more temerity to fight Obamacare at that point?

The longer this monster survives and the longer its perceived front-loaded benefits begin to actualize and create dependency, the harder it will be to repeal.  We cannot assume that we will ever have enough votes to repeal it statutorily because you need full control over government to accomplish that.  That leaves us with the option of the budget process, which can be used to force the issue as long as we have control of one branch of government.

We have three opportunities to defang Obamacare by forcing a budgetary impasse; the FY 2011 budget, the debt ceiling, and the FY 2012 budget.  Boehner has already punted on the first one.  More importantly, through the process, he obviated our chances of defunding Obamacare during the next two “really important” battles.

Simply put, there are two incontrovertible realities that were revealed from round one of the war.  One, Democrats will never willingly acquiesce to a deal that attenuates their dependency empire in any meaningful way.  And second, Republicans will never use the budget process to force those policies if it will cause a government shutdown.  This is a lethal combination for any leverage that we might have during the “real” battles in the future.

As time passes, and we continue to consummate every last Democrat entitlement program and special interest market-distorter, is it too unreasonable to ask when the end game is for Obamacare?  Or will it become irrevocable like every other entitlement program, thus forcing us to choose from a few mediocre options to reform the program, instead of repealing it?

It is for good reason that Democrat consultants advised their party leaders to commit political suicide in 2010 for the purpose of creating the mother of all entitlements, permanently securing a perennial electoral base.  They knew that if they harnessed their opportunity to pass Obamacare, it would never be repealed.  Based upon the behavior of some Republicans, I can’t say their premonition was faulty.

House conservatives must demand from leadership, at least privately, an end game to these policy riders, most importantly, Obamacare.  If the “real” battle is not waged in the near future, there will be no other chance.  There is no time like the present.

Do we really want to place our entire future solely in the hands of Anthony Kennedy?

COMMENTS

  • Carol Tarasewicz

    I live in MA, I read the Boston Herald, which is the conservative paper vs The Globe. McGovern is going on a hunger strike to protest the cuts to the budget. Who cares? There were several columns in the paper today, you would have thought the whole USA was under attack.

    We will have to wait to see what happens with the 2012 budget and debt ceiling. I want to see Obamacare defended by the dem senators that are up for reelection next year. I want them on the record now that they know how we hate it. This could be very interesting to watch.

    • edintexas

      I’m afraid we’ve already seen what will happen. The Republicans will fold. If necessary, they will be helped to fold by Graham, Brown, Collins and Snowe. You say you wish to see the Dems defend Obamacare, but to see that you will need to have the Dems actually keep their promise, and then actually allow debate instead of just doing an up or down vote with no debate (do you think Mitch McConnell has the fortitude to force debate?).

  • avgjo

    the part of your timeline that says the GOP will get the White House/Senate back in ’12. I am afraid that Friday and the stuff later this year that you predicted will demoralize voters and hand Obama 4 years.

    • volunteerstate

      If REPUBLICANS can NOT find the BACKBONE to stop funding for programs that DESTROY a free market, constitutional republic…. then bring on socialism, obamacare, the end of the liberty. SHUT DOWN PROGRAMS THAT ARE IMMORAL, HATED BY THE VAST MAJORITY, and for WHICH YOU WERE ELECTED. …..PLEASE.

  • PaladinLostHour

    In your scenario, the Republicans actually would have an opportunity to repeal Obamacare through statute:

    When the Republicans win the Senate in 2013, they tailor the organizing body principles such that reconsideration or repeal of *any* bill passed originally through reconciliation is subject to filibuster.

    This solves 2 issues:

    1) it doesn’t vitiate the principle of the filibuster’s use to stop authentically bad legislation when the Republicans (inevitably) return to the minority; and

    2) it strongly discourages the abuse of reconciliation to achieve massive policy changes on party line votes.

  • PaladinLostHour

    the above should read:

    When the Republicans win the Senate in 2013, they tailor the organizing body principles such that reconsideration or repeal of *any* bill passed originally through reconciliation is NOT subject to filibuster.

    one small word – big difference. Apologies for the oversight.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      In such a scenario, wouldn’t the Dems have the ability to filibuster the adoption of the rules for the session? Kind of like the cart before the horse.

      • Adjoran

        The rules are one of the things which cannot be filibustered.

        Usually when a rule change is obnoxious enough to one side, though, they avoid it by threatening to shut down the Senate for everything else.

  • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

    I wish there was one R, just one, who’d get up in front of the microphones and call the Ds “baby-killing, anti-military, tax-raising, anti-2nd Amendment scum.” Then stand back and watch the lamestreamers howl! The closest anyone came was Joe Wilson, saying “you lie” to BOzo. But he ruined it by apologizing.

    Won’t happen. Too rude. But it would be fun …

  • vitalis

    Republicans in the House can pass it piece by piece, starting with the Dept of Defense and then working done to the less “constitutional” Depts. If the cuts suggested by the Republicans are too big, then the Democrats can just shut down that Dept until we reach agreement. We might never come to an agreement on how much to fund the Dept of Education :)

    • Kyle-MI

      and post simultaneously.

  • Kyle-MI

    And the answer to how is selective shutdown. Quit playing to the Dems strength. Stop allowing them to hold popular portions hostage to their unpopular agenda. Do not pass the whole thing as one big bill. Pass it section by section, starting with the highest priority and leaving the contentious stuff to last. We shouldn’t have to “defund” anything. If it is not funded it does not exist. Let Dems refuse to fund popular portions in order to keep their unpopular ones going. For example, let them block medical research funds to keep Obamacare going and PP funded.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      They really need to go after the energy and interior approps, especially with them locking up our natural resources during a time of record energy inflation. It will be hard for the Dems to promote agencies that are instrumental in keeping gas prices high.

      • acat

        Pass each department as an independent budget.

        Better add a line or two forbidding the executive from reallocating monies from one department to another…

        Mew

  • quill67

    You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin?just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard ’round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn’t die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well it’s a simple answer after all.

    You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, “There is a price we will not pay.” “There is a point beyond which they must not advance.”

  • luvnthebigsites

    Its epic analysis I’ll give ya that. Unfortunately when 2013 rolls around there will be 3 “registered” political parties in this great nation, which will monkey wrench any grand schemes of the current “statist” parties.

    Dont get me wrong, I like John Boehner. When you wipe away the tears and spray on tan you’ll find a shrewd and capable politician. But in the end America will follow the party that can operate a Texas Instrument Calculator. That would be the Tea party… and yes sometimes it is that simple. :P

    • Kyle-MI

      then you will have handed Obama and the Dems control of the House, the Senate, and the Presidency, again. How did that work the last time?

      • luvnthebigsites
        • acat

          The only way for the Tea Party to survive – not to thrive, but to *survive* – is for the Tea Party to take over so much of one of the two major parties that they become in fact – if not in name – that major party.

          The system has been gamed for two parties almost since parties were developed – parties were, in fact, intended to game the system.

          There is no way for a third party to become a majority party – every time it’s been tried, every time a minority party has gotten 10% of the vote, one of the two majority parties co-opts the issue, reclaims the voters who had come loose, and – in the end – crush the ideological core of the third party while keeping the pretty prose and some of the slogans.

          The Dems have largely co-opted the Greens and the Communists. The Repubs have thus far failed to fully assimilate the Libertarians .. but they’ve got the votes of the more rational ones…

          Should folk run as “Tea Party”, they’ll split the vote – and if they get to 10% they’ll get co-opted and become a historical footnote. Unless – and this is the key – they listen to Cold Warrior, join the Precinct Project, and take control of the GOP.

          Mew

          • akafroman

            The Tea Party is systematically taking over the Republican party (awesome) so there is no need for a conservative third party. However, the electorate won’t recognize this for at least another cycle; if there ever is a third party formation, it would form along the center, not the Tea Party. This would actually probably help conservatives, because most of the Northeast considers themselves “moderate” more so than liberal, and this would allow seats that would otherwise be socialist to be moderated, or allow for the conservative Repub. to win in a three way race :)

          • acat

            The last time a moderate tried a third party was John B. Anderson in 1980. Go ahead and find an actual centrist party before that.

            Third parties are generally ideological – all the ones I cited were – and the ideology is the first thing the co-opting major party discards.

            The kind of “Northeast Republicans go their own way” has no logical reason to happen – let’s call them Yanublicans (as opposed to Dixiecrats) and they would immediately become a regional party – unable to elect a president, and with their candidates competing with more conservative candidates, splitting the vote, and getting Dems elected… at which point they achieve .. nothing.

            Mew

    • akafroman

      If the Tea Party has a strong influence in the primary, which it seems to be having, then no third party will gain traction…and I don’t see a Trump or somebody pulling a Perot.

      • acat

        The system is rigged.

        If it could be done, Perot or before him the Dixiecrats or before them the Bull Moose Party would have done it.

        A third party cannot be done.

        A third party can, though, gain real influence inside a major party…

        Mew

        • congressworksforus

          Wasn’t the original ‘Republican Party’ from the 1850s technically a third party?

          Rather than “take over” the Whigs, a number of them just bolted and formed the Republican Party.

          Yes, the Whigs died on the vine as a result, but I think we’re pretty close to that right now; if enough conservatives take over the GOP central committees in their counties…

          • Diogenes314

            Of course you’ll need to arrange for the Dems to split into three separate parties prior to the election to squeak out a minority EC victory-and then when they win back both houses of Congress you’ll need half of the Party to up and quit.

            Good luck with that.

          • acat

            is *exactly* what the Tea Party, by listening to ColdWarrior’s advice at the Precinct Project, could do … that is, to not have to build a new party from scratch.

            I give the Repubs a bit of a break because, let’s face it, the name Whig went out of fashion somewhere between 1776 and 1850…

            Mew

        • Diogenes314

          Third parties are irrelevant at best, toxic at worst.

          Until and unless we reform our electoral process.

          Then they might be useful for something besides punting.

  • grandma

    Unfortunately, you articulated what I believe will be the scenario.

    The Dems have ravaged and pillaged the us, the taxpayer like a gang of pirates, but I’m feeling the most pain from the assault by my own party on Friday.

    Boehner sold out America – just as surely as the handful of “pro-life” Dems did when they sold out to hellcare. Scum does rise to the top, doesn’t it.

  • america1st

    their piddling “savings” last week for spinal emplacements next week?

    In 1940, the french surrendered even though their armed forces still outnumbered the attacking Germans. Boehner’s position was even stronger and he simply rolled over for the progs. Infuriating. Disheartening.

  • txgho1911

    Can this be done within the republicans and lead to a vote? Are we stuck with JB until 2013?

    I knew this was a wrong turn but I never knew we where so short stacked as we apparently we are.

  • Adjoran

    You have to answer that question first, before jumping on Boehner.

    He cleaned Obama and Reid’s clocks, they had planned to force a shutdown and try to blame the Republicans, knowing that even if both sides were blamed the Republicans wouldn’t be able to do it again. They were shocked by the Prosser win in Wisconsin after the national unions had pulled out all the stops and been working up there for months, but the final straw was the building backlash to their stupid idea to withhold military pay.

    Frankly, it is naive to think we could have shut the government down TWICE and won both times. The independents and swing voters who are with us now have not been finally educated; they have had no epiphany on the road to Damascus. They are as waffly and wishy-washy as they always were, and they would quickly lose their nerve in a second shutdown.

    Scream your fool heads off about the chump change, though – louder, please, so everyone will know who to ignore in the future.

  • GreyCloak

    Republicans cannot force transformational change before the 2012 elections. After all, they only control ?one half of 1/3rd of government?. We can only chip around the edges for now. But just you wait until 2012 when we win the presidency and the Senate. We will really stick it to them then.

    Last time we “stuck it to them,” when Republicans won 2/3rds of Government, our valiant and victorious Party turn a $17 Billion Deficit into a $500+ Billion Deficit … and continued to do so for years.

    Just for the “Washington-Speak” impaired, an annual “deficit” is how much MORE spent than earned in a year … the remainder keeps accumulating in The National DEBT.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      did you read the whole post? It appears from your comment that you did not.

  • kebozarth

    Oh really!!

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      yes, unfortunately that is what some of the inside the beltway types in our own party think of us.

  • rivahmitch

    We have “troops” who appear well-drilled only for surrender. Their “cuts” amounted to 1/1000th of the budget and their “extracted concessions” were a victory akin to capturing pirates so that we can feed, clothe, house and care for them in perpetuity. No matter how hard “Republicans” spin, they just can’t polish this turd.

    The only viable solutions to this problem now lie well beyond any ballot box.

    • 4suramcan

      until the heart of man is changed from screw thy neighbor to “love thy neighbor as you love thyself”. ll chronicles 7:14 comes to mind, also

  • Common_Cents

    Rep. Thaddeus McCotter’s “how to speak like a democrat” is a good start.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPc9xG1sajI&feature=player_embedded#at=92

  • conserv3

    gas is so expensive a majority of people cannot pursue their livelihood. When inflation causes food prices to skyrocket and a majority of people can no longer feed their families and live their present lifestyles.. When interest rates are so high a majority of people can no longer have their dream of owning a home.. When massive healthcare costs, doctor shortages, and 6-month waiting periods cause premature death and discomfort.. When just about everything that our forebears have built over the last 200 years begins to come crashing down on the fools of today. When people finally begin to feel the pain that the stupid policies of the government are causing, When this whole country (with all the dimwits and freeloaders who all still think 2011 is just like 1986 and life will always be lollipops and candycanes) starts feeling lots of pain–sadly then and only then will anyone wakeup and start to really fight for their freedoms. Some people will not change or fight unless the very jaws of hell opens it mouth to swallow them.