« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Time to Focus on the Fed: Oppose Peter Diamond’s Nomination

Say no to the advocates of failed Interventionist policies.

The Democrats have a penchant for advancing their big government dreams through the insidious use of unelected members of government.  To that end, Obama has nominated radical ideologues to judgeships and executive agencies since the beginning of his presidency.

Another unelected body of the federal government that is rapidly becoming a fourth branch is the Federal Reserve.  Due to the vitality of their creeping economic interventions, Obama is seeking to pack the Board of Governors with radical Keynesian stimulus supporters.  His latest nominee, Peter Diamond, will be voted on by the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday.

While our fiscal policy is formulated by 535 members of Congress, our monetary policy is set by 7 unelected members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.  In recent years, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, with the support of Obama, has used the power of the Fed to implement destructive monetary stimulus policies that have benefited Obama’s Wall Street donors at the expense of the American consumer.  The Fed has weakened the dollar to the extent that import price inflation has spiked 11% since last year.  Obama might ramble about not raising taxes on the middle class, but he has used the unbridled power of the Fed to induce the most deleterious tax of all; inflation.

Last week, we advocated that Congress reign in the Fed’s rouge policies by repealing their mandate to intervene in economic policy.  The most immediate concern, however, is to ensure that radical Keynesian stimulus supporters like Peter Diamond are blocked from becoming Governors.

Diamond, an economics professor at MIT, has long advocated for the very big government fiscal and monetary interventionist policies that are so inimical to our economic recovery.  He has even called for a second stimulus.  If confirmed to the Fed, he would undoubtedly seek to accomplish that through monetary policy, even though he has little experience in that realm.  We don’t need a second fiscal stimulus to exacerbate our debt, and we certainly don’t need a third monetary stimulus (QEIII) to service that debt with printed money.

This is where Senate Republicans come into play.

The 7 members of the Board of Governors are nominated by the President and approved by the Senate for staggering 14-year terms.  Most Governors seldom serve out even half of their term, creating frequent vacancies at the Fed.  As such, Obama has thus far had the opportunity to appoint (or promote, in the case of Ben Bernanke) 5 of the 7 sitting members of the Board of Governors.  There are currently two vacancies, providing Obama with the chance to fully stack the Fed with like-minded Keynesian socialists.

Obama nominated Diamond to fill the vacancy last year, but Senate Republicans blocked a floor vote until the 111th Congress adjourned.  Now, Diamond must be approved again by the Banking Committee in this Congress.  Ranking member Richard Shelby has held the line on Diamond until now and should not let his guard down.  The Democrats have the votes to pass him out of committee, but Shelby can take the lead in coalescing opposition to Diamond on the Senate floor.  We have more than enough votes to block him and every Republican should oppose this nominee.  The Club for Growth has already announced that they will score this vote.

In addition to Diamond’s radical ideology, the Club for Growth is arguing that he is not eligible to for the position because he doesn’t live in the jurisdiction that he would represent.  He is being nominated to fill the seat representing the Chicago district, yet he lives in Boston.  This is unprecedented, and it should automatically disqualify him for the position.

As American consumers languish from the crushing costs of vital goods and services, Republicans should use their confirmation powers to highlight the irresponsible and anti-free market policies of the Fed and oppose all pro-stimulus nominees.  Let’s prevent Obama from stacking all of the unelected branches of government with radicals.  It’s time to shed light on the dark deeds of the Fed.  It’s not enough to merely fulminate about big government; we must root it out in every branch.  Vote no on Peter Diamond for Federal Reserve Governor.

COMMENTS

  • edintexas

    Inflation? What inflation? Our government tells us there has been no real inflation. Must be true, the bureaucrats wouldn’t lie to us, would they?

    I doubt I’ll ever live long enough to see the Monster of Jekyll Island slain, but blocking nominees from this radical President would be a minor start. His, and other, Leftist nominations (confirmed and recess appointed) have the abilities of the proverbial bad penny, they keep turning up. The Appellate panel scheduled to hear the appeal of the VA court on Obamacare was selected by allegedly untampered with computer selection. Oddly enough in a Circuit Court which has a history of being the most conservative court in the country, the 3 biggest Liberal judges (1 Clinton and 2 Dear Leader appointments) were randomly selected to hear the Obamacare appeal. As one report noted, the selection couldn’t possibly be more favorable to the Administration.

  • gunslingr45

    bet that the RINOS just cave and give oblam another took to do his dirty work? They just cave and gave the dems Jack McConnell as a US District Court Judge. Heck they didn’t even get a bloody nose in that fight.

  • dajeeps

    Just curious.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      don’t necessarily benefit from the by-product of Fed policies, namely inflation, however, they do benefit from the actual policies of quantitative easing and near zero interest rates. They have contributed to the rise of the stock market. Unfortunately, the rise of the stock market does not reflect the actual health of the economy.

      • dajeeps

        so I don’t understand how Wall St. can be singled out as benefitting while everyone else suffers. Everyone suffers from devaluation because we have to make up the difference in net wealth (in dollars) with something else.

        It’s not that I think Obama is guiltless. No, I’m sure he has plenty of “friends” who benefitted from fiscal stimulus, receiving money they otherwise would not. But I think the statement that he wants to line the pockets of Wall St is more than an embelishment and detracts from the argument more than it adds.

        • Common_Cents

          and turns around and buys treasuries.

          The low rates are hurting savers. It’s a direct transfer from regular Americans to the big wall st money center banks.

          Wall St rackets are toll collectors and not necessarily speculators w/ their own money on the line.

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      and every other debtor, benefit by being able to pay off a fixed debt load with inflated dollars.

      • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

        and ditto. Although most of us benefit to some extent from higher returns on stocks and mutual funds, they devaluation of the dollar hurts us in a more fundamental way.

    • skorrent1

      “Business” benefits, long term, by paying off fixed-dollar debts (bonds) with cheaper money, while their stock prices and real assets generally float up with inflation.

      “Banks” are generally debt holders, so long term they get shafted. However, when “new money” comes from either the Fed or the Treasury it comes first to the banks, so theyget to leverage it and buy assets with “new money” at “old prices”. By the time the “new prices” have filtered through the economy to impact their mortgages, the banks are ready for a new injection of “new money”. That’s one reason why inflation, once started, is so hard to stop.

  • kestrel

    of the MAD moms — the Mothers Against Debt, who have this to say to the government and to the Federal Reserve:

    “Stop printing money. Overworking the printing presses to finance your ‘stimulus,’ the debt or ‘quantitative easing’ makes our hard-earned dollars worth a whole lot less while basic needs like food, energy and fuel cost more. This makes us particularly angry; so quit it.”

    http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/06/wrath-of-the-mad-moms-an-open-letter-to-congress/