« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

We've been here before.

Many liberals in the media are expressing shock over Obama’s apparent willingness to increase oil production.  We all know that he is full of …, I mean ethanol, and they do too.

Those of you who were befuddled at the news that Obama will ‘expand drilling’ in Alaska are not missing anything.  Obama has pulled this political chicanery a number of times.  Whenever a specific proposal that he so adamantly opposes becomes too popular to ignore, he announces his support for it by promising to implement inconsequential reforms.  To that end, he declared during his Saturday radio address that he is “directing the Department of Interior to conduct annual lease sales in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve, while respecting sensitive areas, and to speed up the evaluation of oil and gas resources in the mid and south Atlantic”.

So we are to believe that the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and ANWR, all of which are impounded from drilling leases by the administration, are more sensitive than Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve?  Caribou, baby, Caribou in ANWR; drill, baby, drill in ANPR?  Think again.

Here is the report from The Hill:

President Obama announced Saturday the government would hold annual onshore lease sales in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve; extend the life of leases in the Gulf of Mexico and in some areas off the coast of Alaska for one year; speed up ongoing Interior Department testing in the mid- and south-Atlantic to gauge the level of resources; and establish an interagency task force to coordinate permitting for offshore drilling in Alaska.

The White House is making the policy shifts after taking intense criticism from Republicans in recent weeks over energy policy as gas prices have topped $4 per gallon in some parts of the country.Many of the proposals are incremental expansions of existing policies and had been set in motion prior to Saturday’s announcement. It’s also unclear by how much the plan will increase domestic oil production. (emphasis added)

Once again, Obama is attempting to diffuse disquiet over his anti-energy policies by embracing the opposition through inconsequential and empty promises.  He attempted this stratagem earlier this year when he announced wholesale regulatory reform in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.  Amidst growing pressure to roll back job killing regulations, Obama announced a momentous effort to “study” onerous regulations.  Needless to say, the regulations in the federal register have only grown since his vapid announcement.  In fact, he is attempting to regulate every facet of our economy; from the broadband providers to oil refineries, without congressional approval.  Nonetheless, he is still studying the problem.

Obama used the same ploy in his State of the Union Address by embracing popular policies, such as a corporate tax cuts and tort reform.  We haven’t heard about them since the address and probably never will.

His promise to reform land lease permits and to allow drilling in Alaska is another attempt at subterfuge for the purpose of tamping down the outrage toward his job-killing, anti-growth policies.  After all, didn’t the administration oppose all three GOP bills that would implement some of these very changes just last week?  House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-WA) released the following statement on Obama’s radio address:

“In the last week, House Republicans passed three bipartisan bills that will create 1.2 million jobs, triple American offshore oil production and generate $840 million in revenue – real action to produce real American energy. It’s ironic that while the White House and Congressional Democrats strongly criticized these efforts, President Obama is now taking tiny baby steps in our direction. The President is finally admitting what Republicans have known all along – that increasing the supply of American energy will help lower prices and create jobs. One weekend address announcing minor policy tinkering, while positive, does not erase the Administration’s long job-destroying record of locking-up America’s energy resources.”

As Drudge observed yesterday, Obama made the exact same pledge over a year ago, immediately preceding his inexorable and unprecedented moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).  Sadly, the New York Times was credulous enough to believe it and carried water for Obama by headlining a story at that time titled, “Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time.”  That didn’t exactly work out according to plan.

As such, don’t be fooled by this foxhole conversion.  His speech does not reflect a newfound obsequious to the will of the American people; he will never abdicate his radical ideology so easily.  Moreover, his political appointees at the Department of Energy and Department of Interior will wait for the inevitable lawsuits from environmental legal defense groups to scuttle the plans.  That is what the administration did when they blocked Shel Oil from drilling in the Arctic Ocean.  The environmentalists are already chomping at the bit.  And as is the case with every other proposal, he will encumber any meaningful drilling policies with endless environmental impact studies.  It’s akin to Obama’s promises of securing the border, even as his minions at the Department of Homeland Security instruct ICE agents not to apprehend non-criminal aliens.  Talk is cheap, Mr. President, and in your case, it is worthless.

Call your members of congress and request that they support H.R. 1777, which would implement comprehensive pro-energy reforms, such as opening ANWR for drilling, streamlining the permit and leasing process, and lawsuit reform (summary and commentary here).  Let’s unmask Obama’s fallacious attempt at being pro-energy and make him take a stand against real energy production legislation!

COMMENTS

  • Wayne

    measure to be sure and hardly enough to make a difference in the economy at large. The only way our economy will grow sufficiently to add millions of jobs is with a smaller government out of our way.

    2012 can’t come soon enough.

  • gwalt

    Why bother calling? He is a racist to boot. Could care less about the plight of his/Holders people. We need to get signs put up and blame Obama for high gas prices. Hang this around his neck each and every day. Put up a billboard in an AA community in each big city and watch him open up drilling. If he loses 15-20% of the black vote, he is finished. Nothing like high gas prices, high food prices (even the WIC people feel it), to turn someone against our first black post-American president.
    Now watch the media—See, see—-Obama “opened up” drilling and gas prices are still high. See? See? We told you!!!!

    Liars (spit on ground now).

    • gunslingr45

      the same boat. I am stuck with another Carson. I wish they would get around to redrawing the maps to see if there has been any change in common sense or if I am stuck with the muslim/liberal/lefty.

  • paramedichess

    The House passed two bills to open drilling, and now the President has gone on record (supposedly) supporting more drilling. We need to force a vote in the Senate on the two house bills. This will do two things. First, it will force vulnerable 2012 democrats to choose between their voters (who want more drilling) and their party/lobbyists (who don’t). Second, in the unlikely event that either bill passes the Senate, it would force the President to either sign it (and tick off many in his party) or veto it (and give us some really great campaign commercials next year). We can’t lose.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      Bob Menendez will likely bring his bill to tax oil companies to the Senate floor. That will provide the GOP with the perfect opportunity to bring every embarrassing amendment to bear on these clowns.

      • YnotNOW

        so that we know when to call our Senators for maximum leverage (I already called last week)

    • catfish78

      force the f—— senate to go on record.

  • gpclaw

    This is classic Obama – Pretend to support a Republican position, but guarantee it’s defeat by attaching conditions that he knows the GOP won’t support.

    Yes, this is subterfuge on Obama’s part. He conditioned expanded drilling, with calls to eliminate “tax breaks” for oil companies. The big lie, is that these aren’t tax breaks specific to oil companies, they are “tax breaks” available to our entire manufacturing sector.

    Obama could care less about low gas prices. He’s more interested in creating a “gotch’ya moment” against Republicans.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    He had an episode where he talked the same garbage last year as well. This is wind power, not a reliable promise. More political hot air.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      Don’t give Obama any ideas. He will start subsidizing his own wind power under his green energy regime.

      • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack
        • Michael Dugas

          Leafy green and no substance.

  • snowshooze

    Permits to drill… wellll… we’re gonna have to take a look at that.

  • sowa1

    he will go so far left we won’t be able to stop him. We live in the best Country around and must keep it that way. Vote him and all his Democrat cronies out.

  • jiminga

    he has no intention of keeping, and an effort to make him look like he’s moving to the center. The sheeple will buy it, but it’s up to the Republican presidential candidates to grow a pair and call him on it.

  • popster

    a call to either Niki Tsongas on John Kerry would make a difference. This is just another political ploy by the “Campaigner in Chief”, and these two know it.

  • ag8tor

    many people just as they did in 2008 will buy in on this snake oil and believe that “O” has their best interest at heart. The sheep still believe the shepard. Some still believe in this “hope and change” melarky that the Messiah is preaching.
    Note to the “R” leadership(?)…While I congratulate you on FINALLY using your majority and passing some actually meaningful legislation on energy in the House this is a reminder to the “R”s in the senate that they have a great chance to hold “O” and especially the Senate members accountable for their rhetoric. PLEASE DON’T BLOW THIS OPPORTUNITY!!!!!!! I send this reminder because of the pitifully weak response record of the “R”s. Someone has to give the “R”s a wake up call when they get the softball thrown to them so they don’t strike out looking as they usually do mainly because they have no stones!

  • lizaz

    and just what we have come to expect. The moron could be really creating good jobs by issuing permits for drilling and building refineries, but he doesn’t want to improve the economy, so we wait until Nov 2012 and hopefully he’ll be down the road. Just in case the bills passed this week by the House make it to the floor of the Senate (Harry probably won’t let them), be sure to watch how the 30 some senators who are running in 2012 vote…those who vote against the bill(s) need to have their names widely publicized. They know they can get away with it if we aren’t paying attention!!!

  • leefox

    …scorn on all those that called for “drill, baby, drill” before he even took office, mocking them with asinine claims that we can’t drill our way out of the crisis we are in, yet…

    If we had been allowed to start drilling, is there any argument about where gas prices would be now? (save for the Fed’s meddling with the dollar)

    It’s just too bad democrats don’t even have 20/20 hindsight.

    • ihateliberals

      to turn to socialism and that is all they can see. It’s like when a guy gets arrested for a murder that he did. He has an accompanist that saw him do it. The cops try to get the accompanist to confess and rat on the murderer by telling him that if he will spill the beans they wil let him go. They Promise! he tells and then expects to go. The cops then inform him that they lied. That’s where we are with Obama. He promises everything and delivers nothing. he promise to drill now to get elected and even if someone can get a well started by 2013 it wil never be allowed to pump. some obscure reason will come up to prevent it. Just like his comments now on the shut down of Gitmo. His answer is that it is taking longer than he thought to get this done. Economy same answer,

  • Pingback: Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

  • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

    As snowshooze points out above, leasing ain’t drilling. Obama has agreed to take industry’s money for leases, but has made no commitment to actually permitting drilling.

    As for why development of the ANPR is OK, but ANWR is off limits, you got me.

    I’d bet that the intention is to open the Atlantic areas to seismic exploration, an important step but it’s only assessment, not development.

    Obama has conceded the smallest possible chips in a desperate attempt to make it look like he’s actually doing something about gasoline prices. This shows how vulnerable he is on the issue.

  • lineholder

    All of us are taking a blow from Obama’s policies, but there is a sector of his own base that it being hurt by it very badly indeed…enough so to keep them discouraged about the idea of voting for him again in 2012.