« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Tea Party Victory Against Illegals in Maryland

Immigration enforcement is a winner even in Maryland.

Liberal politicians incessantly demagogue the issue of illegal immigration by offering a false choice between amnesty and a police style roundup of 12 million aliens.  Obama believes that without a pathway to citizenship, even a moat with alligators can’t preempt illegal immigration.   They always forget the third option; enforcing the laws on the books and not offering them hospitality that isn’t afforded to legal Americans.

Last month, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley offered such a taxpayer funded courtesy by signing a bill granting in-state tuition benefits at state universities to illegal aliens residing in Maryland.  Maryland taxpayers already spend $1.7 billion annually on illegal aliens, one of the highest per capita costs in the country.  It is no wonder why Maryland has become a magnet for those whom O’Malley affectionately calls “new Americans.”

While such cloddish policy decisions are par for the course in wacko Maryland, the Tea Party response was quite anomalous.  Maryland is not known for its strong Tea Party presence.  But against all odds, Maryland conservatives have successfully passed the first hurdle in securing a ballot referendum to strike down the tuition law.

When conservative state delegates Neil Parrott and Pat McDonough announced their inchoate plans for a petition drive against the tuition bill, the opposition and the local media dismissed the effort as futile.  After all, how could a few right wing delegates with no money or formal organization obtain the requisite 55,736 signatures (with properly spelled middle names) in the bluest of blue states?  This attitude from liberals, and too many Republicans, is a quintessential example of the dissonance between the elites and ‘we the people’ regarding illegal immigration.

According to Maryland law, we were required to obtain one third of the signatures, 18,579, by May 31, with the remaining signatures due by June 30.  Delegate Neil Parrott worked indefatigably to establish an online petition drive at mdpetitions.com.  Additionally, a small cadre of volunteers went door to door and picketed social events in an effort to obtain enough signatures.  Moreover, they diligently sorted through all of the names to ensure that each signature would pass muster with the fastidious eyes of the board of elections and the dozens of lawyers from the criminal CASA de Maryland organization.

Ultimately, an organic groundswell of grassroots support, in conjunction with the inexorable passion and dedication of the volunteers, made the petition drive a stunning success.  Delegate Parrott reported yesterday that he received over 60,000 signatures, more than three times the threshold required for the first round.  The opposition now realizes that we will easily have well over 56,000 signatures by the June 30th deadline, enough to compensate for the names that will be “litigated out” of the petition by the left-wing lawyers.

The opposition is also keenly aware that once this bill is placed on the ballot in 2012, it will go down to a stunning defeat – in Maryland, of all places.  It would be the first successful attempt to overturn a state law since 1974.  Either way, if the requisite signatures are certified by July, the law will be suspended until the 2012 ballot referendum.

A spokesman for CASA de Maryland, a group that has sought to intimidate petition organizers, conceded that the number of signatures is “very impressive” and underscores that they must “do a better job during the month of June explaining about the benefits” of the law.  In other words, they will flood the airwaves with propaganda commercials, partially funded by Maryland taxpayers.

The salient observation that was noted by the petition organizers was the fact that so many Democrats signed the petition, and even offered to circulate it in their communities.  I bumped into many hard-core liberals who support every big government program imaginable, yet categorically rebuffed the whole concept of offering benefits to illegals.  “What part of ‘illegal’ do the politicians not understand?” was a common refrain from numerous Democrat supporters.  A Democrat state Senator from Baltimore County even volunteered to circulate the petition.

Republicans must learn from the Maryland experience that illegal immigration is not a wedge issue for Republicans.  Quite the contrary, it is a wedge issue that divides commonsense Democrats (to the extent that they exist) from the party elites.  All too often, the supercilious wizards of smart in our own party lament how immigration is a losing issue for us.  Well, according to Gallup, Maryland is the most Democrat state in the country, yet a pro-illegal bill is headed to defeat.  No amount of spin can ameliorate the negative reaction that people intuitively garner towards lawbreakers.

Last week, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz denounced Republicans for believing illegal immigration “should in fact be a crime:”

Congresswoman Schultz might want to take a short drive to Maryland and discover that it isn’t only Republicans who think illegal immigration is a crime; it is all (non-party hack) Americans.

Cross-posted to Red Meat Conservative

COMMENTS

  • Deskpilot

    O’Malley and the legislature are, as typical acorss the country, wildly out out touch with their contituents with this tuition proposal.
    As far as anything that comes out of Debbie Whatsinhermouth Schultz’s mouth, dismissed out of hand. The frizziness of her blond hair only serves to reenforce EVERY blonde joke I’ve ever heard.

  • lineholder

    Thanks for posting this. I’m hearing a lot of the same response here in my area of NC. This isn’t anything personal against immigrants. It’s just a matter of the rule of law, enforcing the law, and abiding by the law.

    I wonder how many citizens in MD have seen Debs recent video on the issue??

    Best of success to those in MD pursuing this petition. Any chance other states might follow their lead?

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      only other state that has passed pro-illegal legislation is Connecticut. Fortunately, most other states are moving the other way by passing pro-enforcement legislation like mandatory e-verify or versions of Arizona’s SB 1070. We’ll look into the situation in CT.

      • lineholder

        about recent ruling made by SSA to start sending “no match” letters out to employers again. Napolitano had rescinded the practice in 2007.

        https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/public/reference.nsf/links/04052011011437PM

        http://immigrationimpact.com/2011/04/26/are-ssa-no-match-letters-putting-american-jobs-at-risk/

      • acat

        Illinois passed its’ own version of the Dream Act …

        http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2011/05/31/illinois-dream-act-private-scholarship-fund-children-undocumented-immigrants/

        Just where the boneheads in Springfield and kleptocrats in Chicago think they’re going to get the money for this is anybody’s guess, the state’s been running a structural deficit* for something like a decade now …

        Mew

        * the state budgets are literally based on robbing Peter, or more accurately, Peter’s grandkids to pay Paul.

        • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

          about that one. The loss of the governorship in Illinois is turning out to be one of the most consequential failures of the 2010 elections.

  • NRPax

    …and in Montgomery County, no less. I have to admit I’m surprised that the signatures were gathered but it’s nice to know that the law still means something.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    as seen in California (Prop 8) or Wisconsin (Senate recall elections) and many other places, I’m sure, as well.

    The money trail for such goon tactics can be decidedly murkier, as oppposed to election laws.

    • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

      The Rs and probably a lot of the TP members need to develop a Fight Club mentality. They’ve got to learn how to hang in there to the bitter end, the way the Ds do. We also need people manning the polls on election day. And serving as election judges, too. (My money goes with my mouth here.) It’s frustrating as all get-out, thinking what’s happening with elections in this country, but we must remain vigilant.

  • carolina

    All of the new voter ID laws and illegal immigrant ‘mitigation’ laws give me hope for the country. Now FL is going to drug-test welfare recipients.

    The people are gradually making in-roads against the BIG govt agenda.

  • johnt

    There’s votes to be bought, plus a cheap opportunity to pound one’s concave chest in faux righteousness, Then there’s the federal judges after a successful vote who will try & overturn the people’s will based on a reading of the Constitution that only an asylum inmate could see.
    But the Normal People have to try, Good luck to them.

  • victrola

    I’m always amazed that Republicans fall for the lie the media pushes that cracking down on illegal immigration is political poison. Nothing could be further from the truth, Americans overwhelmingly want the nonsense to stop, particularly blue-collar, middle class Americans. You put issues like this on the ballot and you’ll find 60%-70% of voters are in agreement, even in traditionally blue states. Why do Republicans run from this?

    John McCain showed how absolutely futile it was to be an open-borders Republican. Had he gone after Obama’s support of driver’s licenses for illegal aliens, I think that election would have been MUCH closer.

  • patryott

    they win elections, it’s the pretenders that lose. This has been proven time and time again, Conservatism Rulz

    Who Is Pat-Ryott.com

  • gabs

    who does not demand that employers of illegals do jail time – no matter who that employer is – is serious about illegal immigration. There is absolutely nothing else at all that will have any impact. The people providing the jobs are the source of the entire phenomenon, whether it’s a construction company, restaurant, farm, or your neighbor who hires a nanny or handyman.

    Any candidate who doesn’t propose jail time for employers is a panderer and a liar if he claims he’s going to do something about this. You can dig a moat, build a wall, anything you want but you won’t stop the problem till employers have strong disincentive. Right now, they don’t see why they shouldn’t hire cheap labor. If the ones they have get caught, the new ones will go where the money is: here.