Dozens of Republicans Vote for Handouts to Big Labor


Big Labor GOPers supporting Obama's administrative power grabs, crony capitalism, wage controls, and fleecing of taxpayer.

Yesterday, the House passed the largely non-controversial Military Construction/Veterans Affairs Appropriations (MilCon) bill for FY 2012.  Unfortunately, it is these non-controversial bills which provide a safe haven for meretricious policy initiatives through the rapid fire amendment process.  While everyone was focused on presidential politics, the House passed an amendment forcing government contractors to use labor unions on federal construction projects.  Oh, and like most bad legislation, this amendment passed by one vote, with the help of 27 Republicans.

In 2009, Obama used his signature power grab tool; an Executive Order, forcing all private companies to sign a project labor agreement (PLA) in order to bid on federal construction projects.  PLA’s compel the private contractor to use only unionized workers for the perspective project.  This executive power grab is nothing more than an election payback to big labor, which would ostensibly purloin the taxpayer with forced collective bargaining for all public construction projects.

This malevolent executive order would also discriminate against non-union workers.  Keep in mind that only a small percentage of private sector construction workers are unionized.  As Congressman John Culberson (R-TX) said on the House floor, “So the Obama administration through this executive order is attempting to unionize any private company in America that wants to do business with the federal government.”  Then again, Democrats have been paying out their union cronies with the blood and sweat of American taxpayers for years.

Last month, Republicans on the Appropriations Committee inserted language in the MilCon bill to nullify any executive mandate for project labor agreements.  Ironically, it was a Republican, union shill Rep. Steve LaTourette, who proposed an amendment to strike out the anti PLA section from the bill.  He rounded up 26 other Republicans and helped Democrats preserve Obama’s pro-union discrimination by 204-203!

In addition to fleecing the taxpayers with a union giveaway, 54 Republicans voted down an amendment (Justin Amash- AMDT 413) to prohibit the use of funds to enforce Davis-Beacon prevailing wages.  This Great Depression era pro-labor law inflates the cost of public contracts by forcing the government to pay highly subjective “prevailing” wages to those who contract with the federal government.  Rep. Amash and others have been seeking to use approps bills to strike out these wage controls from government contracts.  Each time, there were enough rouge Republicans to defeat his amendments.  The amendment to the MilCon bill failed 178-232, with the help of way too many Republicans.

Yesterday’s “non-controversial” House votes are quintessential examples of the need to shed light on the banal, yet consequential, proceedings of Congress.  We simply cannot sit idle and assume that a Republican-controlled House will scuttle pernicious legislation without some “outside help” from the Tea Party.  Sadly, this holds true even for those bills which offer handouts to the largest bankrollers of the Democrat Party.


Category: , , , , ,

RSS feed

24 Comments Leave a comment

I'll never understand what motivates

junkbondtrader41 Tuesday, June 14th at 1:17PM EDT (link)

ANY Republican to do any sort of favor for labor unions. Ever. They try to cut our collective throats indiscriminately of how any individual pol might vote, every chance they get, the closing thing to a blood enemy you can get in politics. One might as well vote to give federal money to George Soros.

Anyone want to take a stab at the explanation?

Follow Amash on Facebook

enrique Tuesday, June 14th at 10:07PM EDT (link)

The best thing about Amash, aside from him being a strict constitutionalist, is that he posts every vote that comes before the House. Whether you like his bills or not, you can follow all the garbage that the House does that doesn’t make the news.

Be sure to like him at www.facebook.com/repjustinamash

“There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one striking at the root.” Henry David Thoreau

 
 

Some of this has to be put on the Republican leadership

Scott Tuesday, June 14th at 2:19PM EDT (link)

If they did not whip the vote enough to know exactly the outcome of something like this then they failed their duties. If they had any idea that this would pass, they should have slowed it down and pressured those aye votes to no.

Pelosi never failed on a vote like this

civil truth (Diary) Tuesday, June 14th at 3:05PM EDT (link)

…even keeping the vote open for hours until she could change votes if she needed to.

This is a binary lemma: we either have incompetent or duplicitous leadership.

I don’t know which is worse…

The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis

 
 

Big Tent Syndrome

pauly1620 (Diary) Tuesday, June 14th at 2:30PM EDT (link)

This sort of thing is precisely what happens when the party sells its soul in favor of the “big tent” philosophy. We have only ourselves to blame.

If you’re incompetent you have to be honest, and if you’re crooked you have to be clever.
“The Rule of the City” ~Sir Desmond Glazebrook

I see Paul Broun didn't vote on this one. What is going on here?

red_oakster (Diary) Tuesday, June 14th at 3:02PM EDT (link)

I get why a NY Republican like Pete King votes aye. My problem is with a non-voter like Broun or a congressman in a safe GOP district in New Jersey like Lance or Chris Smith. And while I know Michigan is a union-heavy state, McCotter’s vote in favor nonetheless is disappointing.

 
 

Rep. Shimkus a "not voting"

anacreon (Diary) Tuesday, June 14th at 3:24PM EDT (link)

Rep. Shimkus (R-IL 19th Congressional) has had a history of supporting PLAs. He has received a great deal of flak from his district regarding this issue. The MilCon bill was a prime opportunity to reclaim his conservative credentials but decided to “not vote”. As a result, as you pointed out, the amendment passed by 1 vote. If Rep. Shimkus would have voted no, conservatives could claim a victory, but instead, Rep. Shimkus voted with President Obama.

Sure, there were other Rs that did not vote, but I am only concerned with the voting record of my Congressman on this issue. If my Congressman would have stood up and actually voted against President Obama, things could have been different.

www.downstateiladvocate.com

re: Illinois Republicans and PLAs

Gwynplaine (Diary) Tuesday, June 14th at 11:48PM EDT (link)

That’s a shame about Shimkus. My congressman, Rep. Aaron Schock, actually voted for the MilCon bill as did several other Republican lawmakers from Illinois — Judy Biggert, Peter Roskam, Bob Dold, Timothy Johnson and Joe Walsh. Three Lincolnland Republicans who surfed the 2010 tea-stained wave into the House of Representatives — Bobby Schilling, Randy Hultgren and Adam Kinzinger all voted “No.” A special high-five to Schilling who hails from a blue collar union district.

Is it any wonder that Illinois, once a red-leaning swing state, has turned an appalling shade of asphyxiation blue?

******
Driscoll: Do you think he’s crazy, Skipper?
Captain Englehorn: Just enthusiastic.

 
 

The Losership in action

drfredc Tuesday, June 14th at 3:44PM EDT (link)

The GOP LOSERship needs to be reminded of their Constitutional duty to promote the GENERAL welfare, not welfare of a select form of workerbees called unions… If some of their members haven’t figured this out, it’s time for their reassignment to dogcatcher committee. The Nation’s first BLUE president leadership isn’t getting the Red White and Blue moving, neither will the GOP LOSERship.

Always, Fred C

 

Most of them were from IL, NY, OH, NJ

carolina Tuesday, June 14th at 6:08PM EDT (link)

Barton, from TX was a surprise for me. However, there are plenty of large construction companies that are Unionized. Maybe one of them is in his district.

Yes, but there were

momofthecastle (Diary) Wednesday, June 15th at 10:49AM EDT (link)

some Floridians, too, and surprising ones at that. Do they not think the small print is important?

 
 

Most of them were from IL, NY, OH, NJ

carolina Tuesday, June 14th at 6:08PM EDT (link)

Barton, from TX was a surprise for me. However, there are plenty of large construction companies that are Unionized. Maybe one of them is in his district.

 

thx Reichert

rec0n Tuesday, June 14th at 8:03PM EDT (link)

once again. Really wish I could say I was surprised, but since I live in his district, I’m not.

Jackass.

There are a lot of Jacka......s

jlsankot Wednesday, June 15th at 6:37AM EDT (link)

and, sad to say, 3 came from Iowa. Yes sir, you can always count on Boswell, Braley, and Loebsack to pull this nation down further. If it’s the wrong way to vote, they will vote the wrong way.

Just disgusting!

 
 

Proposed workaround:

jiminga Wednesday, June 15th at 7:25AM EDT (link)

A construction company could form a new LLC specifically for the proposed project, hire workers from the local union hall, and dissolve the LLC after completion of the project. Maybe a good way to use Obama’s own tactics against him.

Your LLC Proposal

funwithknives Wednesday, June 15th at 2:08PM EDT (link)

To bid on a Project , Construction Cos. have to be Pre-Qualified and show all sorts of successes,and yards of Prior federal achievements. A recent LLC with no history might never even be allowed to bid, or get knocked our in Pre-Qualification reviews. I know this applies to Fed. Backed road building as I delt with said processes for years. Plus there are the Construction Bonds you are required to get. Go ask some one involved in these trades what THAT IS LIKE, and get back to us. For a recently formed Co. to get a fair sized bond is laughable. Track record is imperative. Nice thought ,though.

 
 

No reason

ag8tor Wednesday, June 15th at 7:48AM EDT (link)

to have the majority if you’re going to knuckle under to the left every time a union vote comes up. This is just another example of the business as usual approach in DC. They prove once again that no matter what their affiliation these so-called leaders don’t give a damn about anything but their political careers. This has got to be the most worthless bunch we have ever had in DC even with the addition of the Tea Party members. Even more reason to get rid of them when the come up for election again. Enough already with CAREER POLITICIANS! PLease work to rid the country of these leaches. If ever TERM LIMITS was a good idea, it’s NOW!

 

Same

gunslingr45 Wednesday, June 15th at 9:13AM EDT (link)

as Mitch here in Indiana who let the “right to work” die a slow death. I knew there was something about him I didn’t like. Just could not put my finger on it.
They claim they are repugs. If this is the new party, it may be time to jump ship and switch parties if they can’t back us on what should already be our right to work without paying union thugs dues!

So many RINO’s so little time!

 

Self Absorbed Conservatism

hilltop Wednesday, June 15th at 9:57AM EDT (link)

Just what is it you don’t get? The only difference in ideologies in congress is the liberals spell it “liberal” and the republicans “riberal”. The systemic progressivism is just that. What is in the best interest of congress bears no resemblance to ours. We need to get over it so we can begin to get over them. And while I’m at it.

Sarah Palin, the only chance she has to succeed is? Can you imagine 2-10 or more prospects on stage for a debate and on walks Sarah? From that moment, as far as the press is concerned, she would would be the entire focus for as long as she was in the race. How do you think the others would react? How much damage would this cause the republicans in general and would it short circuit any worthwhile co-operation from that day forward? She knows that if no one else emerges, well there you go. She walks in at the convention as a fully vetted true constitutional conservative having shown the press to be a group of progressive apologists with empty magazines . The place would go nuts. She is special and the liberals and riberals know it. Thats when the campaign would truly begin. Consider this, she withdrew as a target as Alaska’s governor to protect and better provide for her family and at the same time aquire the means to proceed, so is she still in protect mode? Is she that smart? I think so.
But then again I could be wrong.
Tyranny in the guise of the NLRB would not exist if we as citizens didn’t tolerate the systemic tyanny built into government on all levels. From local codes to federal and state mandates every minute of every day government controls every move we make and unless we are willing to unhook ourselves from the government tit then all this blather is nothing more than a bunch of crows sitting on a wire cawing and looking for and opportunity.

You feel better now? nt

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, June 15th at 10:03AM EDT (link)

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 
 

What a Crock!!!

texan4america Wednesday, June 15th at 10:39AM EDT (link)

Any Republican voting for such as this should be “drawn & quartered!!”

Texan4America

 

Thanks for giving us a good starting list on pols that need to be primaried

disintelligentsia (Diary) Wednesday, June 15th at 11:01AM EDT (link)

n/t

“Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction.” –Thomas Jefferson to Wilson Nicholas, 1803.

 

These Guys are the New Republicans and they are actually Liberal

ihateliberals Wednesday, June 15th at 7:40PM EDT (link)

Republicans. They have chosen this time to come out of the closet and try to run the Party. If they are successful in getting Mitt Romney nominated we are in real trouble. Romney is McCain 2.0 with Obamneycare tucked under his arm. Romney is RINO and they are worthless and think that Conservatives shouldn’t be in the Party. I don’t care that RINO’s are int he Party but don’t try to pas themselves off as Conservatives. Karl Rove, George Bush (both) John Boehner, Eric Cantor are just a few of the RINO’s that continue to refuse to actually recognize Conservatives in the Party. Karl Rove almost single handily gave harry Reid his seat back in the congress by attacking Angle. One thing about the Democrats they wuld not have made such a stupid move even if they didn’t like the Democratic candidate. We not only have to fight the Democrats now we have to battle with our own camps before any progress on the economic recovery can be made.

 

wobbly

bcomber38 Thursday, June 16th at 4:43AM EDT (link)

Looks like we got a lot more rinos thenwe thought.WE need a third party to counteract the weak kneed congress.Webbie Wobbly,chicken shits.