Well, we really stuck it to the Democrats today. Instead of passing Cut, Cap, and Balance, a plan that will never pass the Senate and would have foisted the blame of a default upon us (supposedly), we orchestrated a plan to really own them. We came up with Boehner plan 2.0 that..well, .....will not pass the Senate – and will force a default, unless we agree to a watered down version of the watered down version.
As of late this afternoon, the underpinnings of a compromise Democrat plan were beginning to materialize:
Democrats are aiming for a debt-limit compromise similar to the House Republican plan, with at least one major difference: The second vote on raising the debt ceiling would not depend on Congress passing a broader deficit-reduction package.
The shape of this potential compromise meshes major elements of the proposals offered in recent weeks by House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), according to Democratic officials familiar with the negotiations.
Under the possible compromise, Congress could still get a second crack at voting on the debt limit within months. But rather than linking the vote to Congress approving the recommendations of a new 12-member committee — as it would be in Boehner’s bill — Democrats prefer McConnell’s proposal that allows President Barack Obama to lift the debt ceiling unless two-thirds of both chambers override his veto of a disapproval resolution, the officials said. (emphasis added)
So, if this is ultimately the best plan that Democrats will pass, should we support it? What is the bottom line for GOP leaders, in which they would be willing to keep their a@#$ on their own line?
As we speak, House leaders are going through cerebral gyrations to convince Republicans that this is our last option. Earlier today, Speaker Boehner refused to say whether he would force his own bill to the brink if and when Harry Reid rejects it in the Senate.
At the very least, these leaders owe the rank-and-file members two commitments: 1) They will commit to fighting for at least some of the fundamentals of the House-passed budget. 2) Even though they retreated on Cut, Cap, and Balance and are forcing them to vote for an "imperfect bill," they will hold the line on Boehner 2.0, reject any further compromise, and tell Obama to get his a@#$ in line.
Or, is that bellicose rhetoric only reserved for fellow conservatives?