« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Proposed Questions for the GOP Debate: Time for Specifics

Although a debate stage with eight candidates is inherently conducive to a circus atmosphere, the debate moderators need to focus on questions which elicit substantive answers to specific policy questions from the candidates.  Moreover, the liberal moderators from Politico and NBC should remember that they are overseeing a Republican debate.  As such, their questions should stem from conservative premises, and should provoke thoughtful responses from the candidates – responses that will demonstrate their visions of conservative governance to a conservative electorate.

Another bonus proposal would be for the Reagan Library to screen the audience more carefully to prevent outbursts of cheers and jeers, thereby engendering a more serious atmosphere than the previous debate (yes, we’re looking at you, Ron Paul supporters).

Here are some proposed questions:

- Entitlements & Mandatory Spending:  Everyone likes to offer vague bromides about the necessity for entitlement reform.  What is your specific plan to reform the three big mandatory spending programs?  How will that plan uphold the integrity of the free market and conservative principles?  What is your plan for the burgeoning “other mandatory spending programs,” such as food stamps, welfare, and extended unemployment benefits?

-Federal Reserve: Many conservatives have criticized the Fed’s interventionist policies as the culprit for a weak dollar and higher commodity prices.  What reforms would you impose on the Fed?  Would you repeal the Fed’s dual mandate to achieve economic growth, leaving it to focus just on currency stability?

-Taxes: Some candidates have offered a more specific tax reform plan than others.  What specific rates would you propose for the personal income tax, the corporate tax, capital gains & dividends?  Should we abolish the death tax?  Which tax credits and deductions, if any, would you keep?  Do you believe in refundable credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Additional Child Tax Credit?  Do you support Obama’s proposal to extend the 2% payroll tax holiday for another year?

- Energy Subsidies: Should we abolish ethanol subsidies, or merely reform them as some in the Senate have proposed?  What about farm subsidies?  Should government invest any resources in alternative fuels, or should that be left to private enterprise and the free market?

Do you think there is any role for price & wage controls or subsidies in a free market economy?

- Nuclear Energy:  Is the failure of Japanese nuclear plants during the tsunami relevant to our nuclear energy program? Do you think we should still pursue a robust nuclear energy program in this country?

- Patent Reform Bill: Congress is set to pass a patent reform bill this week.  It enjoys broad bipartisan support, and the president is touting it as an engine for job creation.  There are small minorities in both parties that oppose it.  Do you think we should transform our first-to-invent system into a first-to-file system?  Is this a jobs bill?

-Healthcare: Presumably, everyone supports the repeal of Obamacare.  Nevertheless, even before Obamacare, the cost of healthcare had been skyrocketing.  What do you think is the cause of the high healthcare costs and what conservative solutions would you implement to create downward pressure on healthcare costs?

-Downsizing Government: Everyone in the Republican field repeats incessantly that the size of government is too big.  The power and scope of government is structured through departments, agencies, boards, offices, and programs.  Which ones would you eliminate?

An American president is inherently limited in his ability to control the entire executive branch by himself.  How would you ensure that inveterate agencies and offices, which are controlled by career bureaucrats and have an innate proclivity to expand, are reined in by the administration?

-Transportation/ Infrastructure: President Obama is pushing for a new infrastructure stimulus as part of his jobs plan.  Do you think that surface transportation should continue to be a primary responsibility of the federal government, or should we abolish the federal gasoline tax and devolve transportation spending to the states?

Over the past few decades the Postal Service and Amtrak have racked up billions of dollars in losses.  Should we privatize them?

-Education: Would you repeal No Child Left Behind?  What role, if any, should the federal government play in education?

-Housing: Should the federal government be involved in public housing, rental assistance, and housing finance activities?

-Immigration/Homeland Security: It is universally understood that we must gain control over our borders.  What specific steps would you pursue to achieve a secure border?  Do you believe that the intent of the 14th amendment was to grant citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants?  How would you ensure that illegals don’t receive welfare benefits or tax credits?  Do you support mandatory E-verify and Real ID?

What reforms would you institute to our legal immigration system?  Would you encourage changes to the volume of immigration?  Do you think that 1.1 million legal immigrants per year are too much?  Would you abolish the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program?

There have been dozens of attempted terror attacks since 9/11, many of which were plotted by legal residents, or even American citizens.  Most of them originated from Middle Eastern countries.  What reforms would you implement to ensure that there is more scrutiny of those who originate from countries that represent security risks?  Would you make changes to our airport security system and the TSA to focus more on targeted threats, while preserving the liberties of the vast majority of travelers?

-10th Amendment:  There has been a newfound alacrity for the 10th Amendment, which states that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  What do you believe are the boundaries to which even state governments cannot traverse, and must cede exclusively to the people?

-Trade: Are you concerned about the growing trade deficit?  Do you believe that the primary culprit is free trade, or the fiscal deficit, along with imprudent domestic policies, such as over-taxation and regulation?  Should we support protectionist programs like the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)?

-Life/Marriage: Assuming Roe v. Wade is not overturned, what will you do to promote the sanctity of life as president?  If Congress fails to send a Federal Marriage Amendment to the states, what will you do to preserve the institution of marriage from becoming redefined?

-Iran: For everyone except Ron Paul; what specific measures would you take to preclude Iran from meddling into Iraq and from obtaining nuclear weapons?

-Arab Spring: Do you believe that pursuing democracy in the Middle East is a prudent or even laudable goal per se?

- Syria: As the Assad regime in Syria faces public uprising, should we stay out, or should we work to bring down Assad?  What would you do different from the Obama administration in regard to Syria?

-Israel/UN: Do you believe that the creation of a Palestinian state is in the best interests of our security concerns?  What role should we play in the U.N over the coming years?  Should we cut off funding?

-North Korea: Would you continue pursuing the six-party talks with North Korea?  If not, what policy would you implement in order to more effectively keep this rogue nation in check?

- Iraq/Afghanistan: What would you do to prevent Iraq from becoming an Iranian proxy after we pull out from the country?  As casualties mount in Afghanistan and the war enters its 11th year, what do you see as our primary mission there?  How would you pursue a strategy of victory?

-China: Is China a strategic partner, a strategic competitor, or an enemy of the United States?  Do you view them as more of an economic threat or a military threat?

-Russia/Missile Defense: From the pullout of our missile defense program in Eastern Europe to the ratification of START, we seem to be on the run from an increasingly belligerent Russian government.  How would you change our policy towards Russia and ensure that our missile defense capabilities are not hampered by START?

Latin America: There is a growing trend of left-wing quasi tin-pot Hugo Chavez-style leaders assuming power in South and Central America.  Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela all have governing leaders that have either exhibited antipathy and hostility towards the U.S. in varying degrees, or opened alliances with our enemies.  Many of these states are allied with some of our enemies in the Middle East, most notably, Iran.  What is your plan to deal with this creeping threat in the Western Hemisphere?

What would you like to hear from the candidates?

COMMENTS

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Romney has a part of it in his plan but it is pretty weak. He wants agencies to justify that new regs won’t cost businesses money. Hell they never believe that their regs will cost any money.

    I want to see a mandated elimination of many regulations. I want to hear what each candidate would do.

  • anjinconsulting

    I would ask them more specifically in order to force them to either agree with suppositions of the topic or to provide alternatives with specificity:

    - Entitlements & Mandatory Spending
    Social security should be re-organized and structured to perform its intended function. That is to say it should become a true fund, overseen by a board of trustees who are accountable for every penny which is taken from wage earners and who report publicly each year a full accounting of the program. Congress and the president should not be exempt from this program. If you agree with this in principle, how would you go about initiating the required legislation and ensuring the principle goal is not corrupted during the legislative process? If you disagree with please explain the basis for your disagreement and tell us specifically what your goal is.

    It is not fair to wage earning citizens to have to support non-wage earning citizens for perpetuity. It is also not fair for wage earning citizens who must be held accountable for their behavior in terms of drug or alcohol abuse, and yet impose no such accountability on those who receive unemployment compensation. Thus unemployment must be limited to a specific interval. For the purposes of debate, what would you propose as an appropriate interval? If you disagree with limiting unemployment for a certain period please explain your alternative proposal.

    Why should the congress not be forced to pass a balanced budget, except in times of war or national emergencies?

    -Federal Reserve
    Why is it appropriate for the Federal Reserve, an institution who?s leaders are unelected, to be charged with managing economic growth?

    -Taxes
    Why should any particular citizen pay income taxes at a higher rate than another citizen, and why should corporations be taxed as separate individuals when their share holders are taxed on the profits that the corporation makes?

    -Healthcare
    When will you ask congress to repeal the Obamacare bill? If it is not repealed through congress how soon will you ask the solicitor general to challenge it before the Supreme Court?

    -Downsizing Government
    Name a single government agency and 3 government corporations that you would close by executive order. Name the primary government agency that you would restructure by executive order and outline the goals of that re-organization.

    Explain why it is acceptable for government workers to be unionized.

    -Transportation/ Infrastructure
    Other than the interstate highway system, why should the federal government subsidize or otherwise engage in supporting individual states in developing their own roads and maintaining their own transportation infrastructure?

    -Iran and the ?Arab Spring?
    Arab nationalism in general and theocratic Islamic governments in particular seems to be the trend in the Middle East, neither of which is friendly towards the interest of the United States in the region. Why should the United States continue to rely on oil from this region, and if not where should the primary source of that oil be?

    -Israel/UN
    The state of Palestine did not exist until after WW1, and after WWII the state of Palestine was absorbed by it neighbors. Would you ask that these neighbors relinquish that land to recreate the state of Palestine? Why should the US continue to be the principle source of the UN?s funding, and for the purposes of debate, what woudl be an apprropriate approximate percentage or discrete amount should for te reduction of US funding?

    - Afghanistan
    What is the goal in Afghanistan? In other words; what specifically defines the term victory as it applies to this war? Why should the military be restricted from using any means necessary to engage enemy forces in any location within the borders of Afghanistan?

  • breakn70

    “Everyone likes to offer vague bromides about the necessity for entitlement reform.”
    Do you think entitlements need to be reformed, which ones, how and by when?

    “Some candidates have offered a more specific tax reform plan than others.”
    Nearly half of the American public no longer pay federal income tax. Many of these non taxpayers receive a check on April 15. Is this a problem?

    “Presumably, everyone supports the repeal of Obamacare.”
    I don’t presume that from the Rino wing of the Republican party.
    Do you support the complete repeal of this odious law?

    “Everyone in the Republican field repeats incessantly that the size of government is too big.”
    Do you support the repeal of every new regulation imposed by the Obama administration for the past three years?

    ” It is universally understood that we must gain control over our borders.”
    Obviously it is not “universally understood” by either political party or we would have had real steps taken to secure the border at some time during the past thirty years.

    Mr. Horowitz do you really think our Rino brethren especially among our “ruling elites” operate on these same common sense assumptions which you do? I don’t.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      When it comes close to an election, they all repeat conservative platitudes – even the Rinos. That’s why it’s important that they are pressed to offer specifics.

      • APA Guy

        n/t

  • drfredc

    The details don’t matter as much as the direction.

    To ask for details at this point is like having your car’s nav system only show you the last few turns on how to get where you want to go. With too much detail, one is likely to just start useless and endless wonk arguments and wonk nitpicking about this or that nuance that are likely to never be reached, rather getting folks on board with the general direction and goal.

    There’s lots of obstacles and realities that must be first negotiated and solidified before details count — important things like who controls the Senate and House and by how much. Plus, there’s lots of good ideas by lots of candidates — many are mutually compatible, some may not be. Rather than tear each other’s plans down, it would seem best to work to promote a consensus over general direction for more folks to get behind.

    Keep it simple with something the average Bubba can wrap their arms around — something like Red (promote private sector growth), White (Seniors and responsible entitlement reform), and Blue (fair union practices and rules) versus the unbalanced extreme Blue-Green (Hope & Change) agenda of the nation’s first Blue-Green President.

    • Scope

      I understand Romney released a 59 point, 100 page jobs plan. It is already being criticized by some on the right, not necessarily Romney detractors, that it is way to long, and gets way down in the weeds with details. How many voters does anyone really think will read a 100 page plan? Not many. The criticizim is mainly because the legislation coming out of Washington has so many pages, and is so detailed that it drowns the main points in the bill.

      I also doubt that many of the candidates will or need to box themselves into detailed positions this far out in the game. It’s actually counter-intuitive. I want them to talk to me, with whatever words they use, with what their overall direction is on the issues, and to convince me that they have the ability to convince the public to see things their way, so to speak. There will never be another Reagan, but that was one of his greatest strengths.

  • gawken

    Ignore those multiple choice questions…..boxers of briefs, deep dish or flat..and if they pose,them..call them on it..

    Above all..remember..NBC/MSNBC/Politico..well they ain’t your friends…so don’t be afraid to go right at them..

  • benko

    1. “the liberal moderators from Politico and NBC should remember that they are overseeing a Republican debate. As such, their questions should stem from conservative premises”

    Good luck on that unless you have some sedation and a good venriloquist.

    2. The economy/jobs/taxes/debt. If that is not fixed almost nothing else matters. We are in a car headed over the cliff. If the best anyone can do is to slow the care from 80MPH to 79 MPH we can all start printing signs, welcome to Greece. And aside from Ron Paul, who is not electable, I am not sure any of the candidates running will really turn the car around.

    Anyone disagree?

  • benko

    1. “the liberal moderators from Politico and NBC should remember that they are overseeing a Republican debate. As such, their questions should stem from conservative premises”

    Good luck on that unless you have some sedation and a good venriloquist.

    2. The economy/jobs/taxes/debt. If that is not fixed almost nothing else matters. We are in a car headed over the cliff. If the best anyone can do is to slow the care from 80MPH to 79 MPH we can all start printing signs, welcome to Greece. And aside from Ron Paul, who is not electable, I am not sure any of the candidates running will really turn the car around.

    Anyone disagree?

  • Bill S

    In Discussion 101, they teach you to not ask yes/no questions. Now of course we’re dealing with politicians here who probably won’t know how to answer yes/no to a yes/no question. So you’re probably safe, anyway.

    (Good questions, but I’d restructure them to ask things like “how” or “why” or “when” instead).

  • norbleahy

    We need to know if the candidate is ready to enforce the 10th Amendment and return all unconstitutional activities to the States and the People.

  • mirac777

    We have seen rampant corruption within our government the likes of which Al Capone would highly apporve of, especially from Unions buying politicians.

    With tax evasion felons, impeached federal judges ( Alcee hastings), rampant nepitism and over all law-breaking without punishment rampant in Congress today, how would you put a stop to it and hold all your carreer politician cronies and enemies accountable?

    HINT: Prison time and huge fines. I have a list of irrefutable criminal activity having been done by no less than 64 politicians in the last 3 years alone , and not a single elected official has done prison time- all felonies. Corruption will never stop until we make an example of the top 50 criminals in Congress and all levels of government.

  • gunslingr45

    Now your just being funny.

  • byrrni

    I want to know which potential candidates respect and would abide by the Constitution and the checks and balances put into place when this country was establlished. I don’t remember ever studying about regulatory tsars and the ability of the President to promote his own agenda over the objection of the American People and Congress.

  • seventen

    I would like to know if you would vote for Amnesty for all the illegals in our country? To me it would mean they will get free healthcare, education and they also want OUR Social Security money which they have NO RIGHT to since it is not the governments money. It belongs to each individual who paid it in and no one should have access to OUR money. Past Congress members have used that money for theirselves and that is why it is almost broke. We on S.S. need our money to survive on and that is exactly what I mean, survive on. Do not vote to admit illegals who would take our free healthcare, and the education that we cannot afford to send our children to college and they go for FREE!

  • Pingback: Homepage

  • Pingback: ?????

  • Pingback: Free Web Hosting Html

  • Pingback: letmewatchthis

  • Pingback: Party Rentals Corona CA