« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

We the People: A Constitutional Republic, Not a Democracy

Today, we celebrate the 224th anniversary of the signing of the United States Constitution (September 17 falls out over the weekend this year).  On this day, it is imperative that we reflect on the importance of our constitution and celebrate the roots of our founding.  As our nation comes under attack from the forces of tyranny within, we must reaffirm our commitment to the ideals of our founders and founding documents.

Most people often mistakenly refer to our nation as the greatest democracy on earth.  They are mistaken because we are not an absolute democracy; we are a constitutional republic.  That is what makes our nation great, for if we were merely a democracy, we would be anything but great.  And to the extent that we no longer function as a constitutional republic, that greatness is rapidly ebbing away.

Why did we need a constitution?  Why are popular elections not a sufficient means of preserving liberty?

A pure unbridled democracy is a political system in which the majority enjoys absolute power by means of democratic elections.  In an unvarnished democracy, unrestrained by a constitution, the majority can vote to impose tyranny on themselves and the minority opposition.  They can vote to elect those who will infringe upon our inalienable God-given rights.  Thomas Jefferson referred to this as elected despotism in Notes on the State of Virginia (also cited in Federalist 48 by Madison):

An ELECTIVE DESPOTISM was not the government we fought for; but one which should not only be founded on free principles, but in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among several bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others.

Thus, a constitution that limited and divided the power of government was necessary to preclude elected officials from imposing tyranny on the people.  This is why they adopted a constitution with limited enumerated power, divided and checked across several branches and levels.

Sadly, we are currently living through the paramount form of elected despotism that our founders so presciently sought to forestall.  At some point during the progressive era of the early 1900′s, elected officials began to deviate from the constitution in a dramatic fashion.  At present, we find all of our founding principles under assault.  Many prominent political leaders in both parties seek to destroy our free markets, infringe upon our personal liberties, and abrogate our social values. Unfortunately, they have accrued a high level of success.  Moreover, they have prosecuted this revolution without firing a shot.  Instead, they have used the soft edge of the sword of elected despotism.

How have the elected officials been so successful in radically voiding our constitutional republic?  The answer is simple.  They have cynically manipulated their electoral mandate to create enough dependency for them to enjoy perennial power through democratically held elections.

We have reached the point at which almost every American is involuntarily subservient to the federal government for his or her retirement security and healthcare.  Over 45 million people, and one in four children, rely upon government for food stamps. By 2014, under the new Obamacare mandates, an estimated 79 million Americans will be enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP.  This circuitous cycle of dependency, perennial electoral power, and breach of constitutional restraints has transformed our nation from a constitutional republic to a majority-rule democracy.

This is the same majority-rule democracy that is being foisted upon the Middle East in the Arab Spring.  Democratic elections were held in Gaza and Lebanon, and they elected tyranny.  They will be held in Egypt, and they will undoubtedly do the same.  In the Middle East, elected despotism will manifest itself in Islamic tyranny, while in America, it has fostered redistributive socialism.  The fact that Arab nations are deposing of their dictators is meaningless.  As Jefferson observed in Notes on the State of Virginia, “it will be no alleviation that these powers will be exercised by a plurality of hands, and not by a single one.  173 despots would surely be as oppressive as one.”

This form of tyranny can only succeed beyond the confines of a constitution that is preserved with vigilance – a constitution that limits the power of government and preserves our rights as granted by God.  As founder John Witherspoon noted, “pure democracy cannot subsist long nor be carried far into the departments of state – it is very subject to caprice and the madness of popular rage.”

Unfortunately, even many political leaders who purport to abide by the constitution are misinterpreting the Tenth Amendment to promote tyranny on a state-level, if not on a national level.  In many respects, the hard core blue states exercise even more officious nanny-state power than the federal government.  Dependency is so rampant among a broad section of some of these states that nobody but those who purvey socialism can assume power.  These states exemplify the worst fears of elected despotism that Jefferson decried in his writings.  In fact, he was specifically addressing unbridled power at a state-level in his book.

Article 4 section 4 of the Constitution prescribes that “the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government.”  It is incumbent upon us to restore our constitution as the supreme law of the land, so that our God-given rights are not revoked by democracy.

Happy Constitution Day!

COMMENTS

  • Wayne

    I’ve always considered the Constitution as one of the most important works of man. The single most important blueprint for the most successful human experiment in human history.

    A day doesn’t go by that I don’t remind someone that we are not a democracy. It’s amazing how few Americans understand that.

    This recession and the continued expansion of government, will be the seminal catalyst that wakes us up and allows the slow movement back to our roots.

    My opinion only…

  • kraig

    A few years back, the Heritage Foundation gave the pocket version of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. I wish parents would get their kids copies and teach them about our country’s founding. Good job, Daniel.

    • skorrent1

      print those little booklets. Tea Party Primer has one with even more founders’ documents. They run about a buck apiece in bulk. Well worth having and passing out.

    • rightwingmom52

      You can get 100 pocket size for $30 at the National Center for Constitutional Studies (cheapest place I’ve found for bulk purchase).

      here

      I’ve bought a few boxes and donated to Young Republicans clubs in local high schools. We also give them out at our tea party meetings/rallies, etc.

      • funwithknives

        from NCCS all the time, as often as I can. I’m in S/E Michigan and Middle-Easterners, with kids are the most appreciative, by a long shot. I am often told by same that when they inquire at schools, The Constitution is often a non-starter, as learning material.
        When I am asked; “how much? ,I tell them to give me what they wish. I Never Ask for a Dime. This surprises many, but it is of no consequence. THIS is what I can do and I’m GLAD to do it.
        Curiously, as an aside, when I volunteered for a Republican for Congress last year , I told him I was passing these out, and was asked to stop, by his own-self. His reasoning was curious and Needless to Say,I am not going back for Round Two, if it occurs.

  • tailfins1959

    Any time a candidate/elected official refers to our nation as a democracy, they become a flawed candidate.

    Lest we forget: “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the outcome.” –(Attributed to) Benjamin Franklin

    • benko

      “Lest we forget: ?Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the outcome.? ?(Attributed to) Benjamin Franklin”

  • keepourrepublic

    Here is a video that makes the case that America is not a democracy very simply and very clearly. You can show this to anyone and they will get it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DioQooFIcgE

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      It debunks many common myths promulgated by political scientists.

    • ajshea

      “The American Form of Government” — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DioQooFIcgE

      NPV is funded in part by George Soros.

      • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

        appropriate that the two parties are called Democrat and Republican. Fortuitous?

  • johnt

    Hamilton. Now that would curl the hair of Debbie Wasserman Schultz & the NYT. Or would it?
    Make no mistake, the constitution was as much a system of checks and balances on the people as on the representatives, It’s structure was designed to thwart popular, or momentary, passions,ignorance, the sentiment of the moment. There were real voting requirements, States could determine their conditions. Basically trust was sparingly given, caution was the byword.
    Now you neither have to be literate, nor a citizen, and you may vote it seems as often as you wish or as often as you may be bused around. This is Progress. Not even Paine would approve.

  • skorrent1

    Has become more a sharing of unlimited power, with even SCOTUS members declaring the demise of the ninth and tenth amendments. Some date this as beginning with the 17th amendment. Others claim that the 19th amendment changed us from a policeman government to a nanny government. The “one man, one vote” movement, which resulted in the 24th and 26th amendments, and coaxed the SCOTUS into destroying the “republican” form of government in the states, has surely contributed both to the “democracy” emphasis and to the central accumulation of power.

  • http://www.pointofdebate.blogspot.com psu145

    I appreciate your thoughts on the soft tyranny we are all residing in. Progressivism on the coasts has not destroyed us yet but we are rapidly advancing to the point of having more people on government assistance then off. We have rugged individualism engrained into so many of us that I hope there still is time to reverse the trend.

  • surfcitysocal

    “…elected despotism…” which, in my opinion, could be greatly reduced with term limits. Thirty-, 40-, 50-year political careers, can’t help but increase the deafness with which long-term elected despots operate.

  • runner12

    Many people do not realize that we are NOT and never have been a democracy. Our Founding Fathers were wiser than that. They gave us a Constitutional Republic, where the majority would not be allowed to become a tyranny.

    Unfortunately, modern progressivism threatens that balance. That is why it must be defeated.

    Happy Constitution Day everyone!

  • clowngirl

    with only those who pay at least some taxes maintaining the right to vote. Unless we’re talking about a disabled vet or someone else who has become dependent genuinely through no fault of their own.

    At the very least, when signing up for welfare, people should have to temporarily revoke their voter registration until such time as they are off public assistance.

    And we need to change the tax code so that everyone who works pays some taxes — and any tax hikes have to be proportional across every tax bracket – so that anyone who votes for a politician who promises more spending knows that they are voting for raising their own taxes.

    • ajshea

      .

  • pieter

    224 years and everyone is agreement as to the significance as to the document. Where does that leave the unpleasant questions some have as to the more nuanced doubts regarding recent policy or allowances? Obamacare and the commerce clause, sure. Immigration and securing the borders as far as a federally mandated responsibility, sure. Folks readily accept these as worthy of discussion and of import to the national interest. Why not then, natural born citizenship as far as a criteria for holding presidential office? Last I checked there have only been two presidents born after the adoption who were the product of a non-American father (Arthur and Obama). Folks like me know that Mr. Obama is a citizen due to the Wong Kim Ark spin on the 14th Amendment that he was merely born in this country, but such is insufficient if you study history. Anyway, just wondered if anybody else noticed that everything constitutional was subject to debate, save one. Reminds me of AGW and the democratic notion that the science is “settled”. Thanks for letting me post.

  • Pingback: The Fall of a Great Nation?