« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Annual Deficit Will Absolutely Top $1 Trillion in 2012

“It’s going to take a lot more than a few accounting gimmicks and unrealistic assumptions to cure our budget ailment”

Yesterday, the media was agog with glee over reports that CBO is projecting an annual deficit “below $1 trillion for the first time in four years.”

How did they arrive at that conclusion?

This projection was extrapolated from the Treasury Department’s report of the first two months of the fiscal year budget, which, as explained by the CBO’s monthly budget review, pegs the current deficit at $236 billion — $55 billion less than at this time last year.  The media is conflating this monthly report with an outdated long-term CBO budget outlook, which projects only a $973 billion deficit for FY 2012.

You might be wondering how we can achieve such a reduction when there are little or no spending cuts.  After all, even the infinitesimal $6.6 billion in discretionary cuts will be cancelled out by additional emergency spending.  Additionally, mandatory spending programs will only continue to grow this year.  Yes – revenues are expected to climb; they have increased 7.1% from last year, but that would only reduce the deficit by $163 billion, when extrapolated on an annual basis.

Well, like most optimistic economic and budget projections, this one is garbage in, garbage out.  It also involves shoddy work on the part of the media.

First, the CBO report that media outlets are referencing makes it clear why outlays for FY 2012 are sharply down from the previous year at this time – and it’s not because of budget austerity.  Most of the reductions come from an accounting shift.  Most federal entitlement payments are sent out on the first of the month; however, this year, October 1 (which was also the first day of the fiscal year) fell out on a Saturday.  As such, $31 billion of October’s payments (accounting for 55% of this year’s “deficit reduction” and 92% of outlay reduction) went out on the last day of September, thereby saving the new fiscal year from the extra accounting burden.  When adjusting for the payment shift, CBO actually estimates that most areas of mandatory spending increased from the first two months of FY 2011, while defense spending has decreased.  Consequently, overall spending has been virtually unchanged from this point in time last year.

Second, the CBO revenue estimate does not include the inevitable payroll tax cut extension, which will reduce revenues by $120 billion.  The extrapolation of outlays does not include the extensions of unemployment benefits and Medicare doc fix.  These measures will add anywhere from $55-75 billion in outlays.  Even though these costs will be incurred over calendar year 2012 (which defers some of the burden to the first three months of FY 2013), it is safe to assume that roughly three-quarters of the cost will be actualized during fiscal year 2012.

Third, the $973 billion deficit figure that the media is throwing around comes from an outdated CBO report in August.  That CBO report projected that spending would be virtually unchanged at $3.6 trillion, while revenues would climb from $2.31 trillion to $2.65 trillion during 2012.  Everyone agree that barring an unforeseeable downturn in the economy, revenues will be higher this year than during the previous few years.  However, as noted above, their estimate is probably overstating the revenue spike by a factor of two.  The CBO revenue figures are predicated on unrealistic GDP growth during the last quarter of 2011 (Q1 of FY 2012) and 2012.  They also don’t include the annual AMT patch and tax extenders, which could reduce revenues by up to another $100 billion.

Therefore, is clear that the $973 billion annual figure is not a logical extrapolation of the Treasury reports from the first two months.  The November CBO monthly budget review is a clear repudiation of its August budget outlook.  Even at the time, CBO noted that their outlook was outdated, and had they factored in recent economic news, it would have “led CBO to temper its near-term forecast for economic growth.”   The $973 billion figure is old news, and it is predicated on unrealistic revenues, an understatement of mandatory outlays, and the assumption that several important temporary tax and spending provisions will not be extended.  This year’s deficit will be roughly the same as last year’s $1.3 trillion.

Another important factoid from this year’s preliminary deficit figures is that payments for interest on the debt totaled $45 billion, up 19.5% from the same period a year ago.  As long as we fail to cut welfare and reform entitlement programs, interest on the debt alone will cripple our economy, once rates begin to rise back to their historical norms.

If I were Mitt Romney, I would bet you a trillion dollars that the deficit will top $1 trillion this year.  It’s going to take a lot more than a few accounting gimmicks and unrealistic assumptions to cure our budget ailment that has been induced by an overbearing federal government.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.WILLisms.com WILLisms

    The latest data out of Texas yesterday:

    Texas is now projected to collect $82.7 billion in this 2-year budget cycle, up from the $81.1 billion actually being spent. The result: $1.6 billion in surplus.
    Texas closed the 2010-2011 budget cycle with a General Revenue balance of $1.1 billion.
    Texas’ Economic Stabilization Fund (ESF), or Rainy Day Fund, is now projected to have $7.321 billion at the end of the 2-year budget cycle.

    Bam. Distinction. Contrast.

    • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

      (Love your newsletter, BTW :D ) Thanks for the stats!

      • cheetah2

        Contrast: that IS what we need in the election and there is only one Republican candidate that’s got it in spades. Please note: the budget surplus is in addition to the rainy day fund.

    • Corey S

      Texas received $17 billion from the stimulus package. Perry’s office alone received $4 billion. That’s the only reason Texas is in the black. The only credit Perry gets is in managing to get so much money from the stimulus.

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    however, the real factor in all of this is the economy. If the economy/labor market continue to improve, it becomes more likely that the deficit will be cut through higher receipts and lower automatic spending programs.

    • davesinsanantonio

      be okay with you???

  • Samsara

    then you are going to have to make real cuts in entitlements. Why not repeal Medicare part D. It was never paid for, it is a big government giveaway, and it is costing billions. The total expenditures of the program for 2008 was $49.3 billion. Projected net expenditures from 2009 through 2018 are estimated to be $727.3 billion. This is exactly the kind of big spending program that will have to be rolled back for the country is to have a future.

    Unfortunately, the conservative in the presidential race lobbied for this disastrous legislation.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70332.html

    If you want a benefit, pay for it. I can’t see how anyone who voted for or helped push Medicare Part D through Congress can claim to be a conservative. Honestly, can anyone explain this…am I missing something?

  • After Seven

    directing the CBO, for accounting purposes, to defer all further ledger entries of actual spending to December 2012. That way they keep things nice and legal.

  • Scope

    No surprise to me at all as he has been my Rep that is never, ever primaried. The insiders in the VA GOP have their guy, and that is that. Hey the VA GOP insiders also had a major problem because our VA Atty Gen. also was too hard on Romney in the Huckabee debate. He said that in his next day interview on Fox. He said they immediately messaged him with their displeasure following the debate. Fred Thompson also brought up the VA GOP hold for moderates in 08, saying that the state party is like the gestapo, and I promise they are. I live here, I know. No one is going to get rid of them until they die in office. They are like the Byrd’s of the Republican party.

    • mirac777

      Ty Scope! 100% correct! That led me to find this lovely GOP establishment tidbit!

      http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/featured/crony-capitalism/eric-cantor-betrays-us-kills-insider-trading-ban.html

      Man I,m really not surprised, but boy am I p***** off.

      • williamjameson

        read this. Bill full of loopholes thanks to Kirsten Gillibrand aka Ms. Wallstreet the Front Running wanna trade before the public Senator.

        http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/gillibrand_faux_fix_Gx4rwe8yWJtLdujpaR9GpL

  • mirac777

    I saw this charade for the accounting gimmickry it was the minute it hit the news. I might add that the U/E extensions will add billions more to the deficit. We also have the unspoken 45 billion or so the FDIC has wasted /gave away to crony-capitalists and which now has the FDIC holding a measly $1200 bucks for EVERY million dollars they insure. They will ask either Treasury or Fed Reserve for more cash, off the deficit books of course.. ( they already did I believe) And of course all these lovely government projections include “projected” profits and return on green tax dollars loaned to the ever-increasingly bankrupt number of green energy companies that will never make a nickel.

    It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if these big government manipulators of facts haven’t also already included projected revenue increases from the K-XL pipeline that Obama has blocked. That’s just how things are done in DC today.

  • http://www.nucre8ion.org nucre8ion

    than a comment. Could the pullout of Iraq be part of the reduction? Forgive my ignorance of the costs of the Iraqi occupation but It seems to me that since we pulled out that the expenditures have been reduced. Therefore the deficit is lowered accordingly. This is not an opinion, just a question.

  • ihateliberals

    My grandson in first grade can attack math problems with more accuracy.