« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Chickens of Debt Ceiling Deal Have Come Home to Roost

Today, the Treasury Department announced that Obama will ask for another $1.2 trillion increase in the debt ceiling, carrying our national debt to $16.394 trillion by next year.  This will bring Obama’s total share of the debt to $5.77 trillion by the end of his tenure, far more than any other president.  Unfortunately, there is not a darn thing we can do about it.  Yet, it didn’t have to be this way.

Looking back at this year of legislative battles, there is no doubt that the debt ceiling deal wins the award for the most insane capitulation of the year.  In July, Obama, who had already accrued $3.6 trillion in debt, was faced with the embarrassing prospect of asking for yet another increase in the debt limit.  That was our opportunity to extract transformational concessions from Obama in return for the ability to issue more debt.  That was our time to push for Cut, Cap, Balance, or at the very least, a plain balanced budget amendment.

Not only did GOP leaders strike out and squander the entire opportunity, they ground into a double play.  They gave Obama the ability to raise the debt ceiling another $2.1 trillion, just enough to spare him from another embarrassing debt increase right before the 2012 election.  What did we get in return?  Our reward for giving him the increase was, in fact, a twofer gift to Obama.  We were “rewarded” with the creation of the 18th debt commission and the Budget Control Act, which completely abrogated the Republicans budget, thereby obviating any leverage we would have during the remaining budget battles of the year.  After all, how could we go back on our word?

At a time when many “prominent” conservative publications were blithely cheering on this disaster, we detailed nine reasons to oppose the deal.  Among other things, we noted that the deal would encourage notional spending cuts, preserve Obamacare, destroy the Ryan budget, engender deep cuts in defense, and grant Obama a lifeline, all the while, failing to prevent a credit downgrade.

Sadly, my premonition has come to fruition.  After enjoying a free ride on the first $900 billion of debt, Obama now has the authority to issue another $1.2 trillion of debt.  He has blown through the first ‘tranche’ of the debt ceiling increase at a rate of almost $6 billion per day.  Now, pursuant to the debt deal, only a resolution of disapproval from two-thirds of both houses of Congress can preempt such an increase.

Those who promoted this debt ceiling scheme last July with oleaginous columns and speeches, while denouncing its critics as “intransigent,”  should hang their heads in shame.

It is now incontrovertibly clear that this deal was worse than giving Obama a ‘clean extension.’  We could have fought it out another day; extracting a modicum of reforms from Democrats during each battle.  Instead, the bipartisan Budget Control Act, while slowing Obama’s unrealistic baseline spending, will consummate the current unsustainable levels of spending for the next decade.  As long as those who were signatory to the deal are still leading the House, they will be constricted by the spending levels of the BCA.  Republicans can formulate any budget they want this coming April, yet they will feel compelled to commit to the higher spending levels promised under the debt ceiling deal.

So after months of garrulous promises to cut spending, we are left with a budget that fails to cut a penny from discretionary budget authority, even as mandatory spending continues to rise unabated.

Hence, it is often better to do nothing than to pass bad legislation.  Thanks to this failed idea, there is no realistic roadmap for entitlement reform; not a single agency or program will be eliminated; Obamacare is off limits; there will be no balanced budgets, ever.

A simple strikeout would have been far superior to grounding into a double play.  Then again, Republicans are called the stupid party for a reason.

COMMENTS

  • ghostship

    The only leverage the Republicans have is to force a shutdown by refusing to raise the ceiling when the ceiling approaches. Sadly, many Republicans are to afraid to take it that far as demonstrated by the last big debt ceiling debate.

    Fortunately for Obama and unfortunately for the American people the Republicans in the house didn’t “call his bluff” or Obama and crew would have been forced to negotiate.

    I guess we’re just going to have to wait until after it’s too late and everything is hitting the fan until America is forced to deal with reality.

    I would like to say may God help us when that day comes but then I remember a saying that God helps those that help themselves so I guess that option is gone.

    • snowshooze

      Snookered again.
      Every time we had a shot at fixing the mess… we conceded that next week would be a lot better because the political forcast was for sunshine… or something like that.
      I was blindsided by this one.
      This definantly calls for another commission to investigate the previous one. Or something equally severe. And don’t forget to throw in some grandstanding.
      After that we can move on to positioning and blaming.

      Meanwhile, I am considering…. whatever money I have, I should really spend now, for certainly tomorrow, it will be worthless.
      But what should I put it into? Gold?
      Maybe something more pragmatic.. maybe I should stock up on materials for the welding shop.
      Or possibly I should build a bid tank and stock a bunch of fuel, food, toilet paper and reloading supplies…ha.
      The retirement account was seriously deflated a while back, losing every bit of 100K invested from a capitol asset sale in that cycle.
      The money isn’t safe. I don’t even have enough room to be buying a bunch of stuff to be a realistic asset in the long term.

      Boehner and McConnel are not friends of mine.
      They are playing games. I am losing money now. I stand to lose everything else right after that.
      I do not feel I was represented. Technically, I was.
      My Reps showed up and sold me out, bottom to top.
      And Boehner just got done calling in the troops for a mass surrender again. Thanks.
      Hope springs eternal. Yeah.. but this is pretty depressing.

    • civildebate

      When has shutting down the federal gov’t ever worked for Republicans? This political brinkmanship is starting to wear on everyone, as shown by the recent payroll tax debate, and Republicans are taking more and more of the blame each time.

      In a world of fiat money and floating exchange rates, Cut Cap and Balance is incredibly stupid. All the predictions of soaring interest rates due to crushing debt have been laughably wrong over the past 30 years.

      People need to come to grips with the fact that Modern Monetary Theory is the future.

      • heraklios

        and so all they (the liberals) need to do is wait us out.

        Remember the debt ceiling bill back in August? We held the high ground but then Wall Street and the banking industry lobbyists came to McConnell and Boehner and whined that the stock market might go down causing them to lose some money, and that something had to be done, and so the Republican Establishment immediately caves.

        A strong leader in the House would have told Harry Reid and Barry O that if the government is running out of money then you need to cut spending to bring the budget back into balance. If they refused to deal, then you simply stand pat and require the executive to prioritize spending.

        Unfortunately, we have week leaders in D.C. who are beholden to Wall Street and corporate America. Hopefully, conservatives and the Tea Party will be able to boot McConnell, Bohner and their henchmen and install true patriots in their spot.

      • ghostship

        So Modern Monetary Theory is the future?

        What a great gift for us to give our children. Here kids have some Zimbabwe. It’s going to be your future.

        Yuk! And to think that I used to think getting socks and clothes instead of toys sucked when I was a little kid.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        In case you have not noticed, inflation has begun to heat up and more, much, much, more is on the way.

        But we can’t possible ever cut, cap, or balance anything can we? Nosiree, Cuz printing more money creates wealth doesn’t it, and you never really have to pay the debt anyway right? Just ask the folk in Greece.

        • civildebate

          What inflation?

          Once again, Greece doesn’t have their own currency and that’s why their debt is a problem. Note that Japan does have their own currency and their debts are in their currency and their debt is nearly twice ours (by debt to GDP ratio) and their inflation is non-existent… just like ours. The same goes for every country with their debt in a currency they control (i.e. England, Switzerland, US, Japan etc.).

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            The European economies are not far behind. and we are just the best of a lot of beggar nations.

            We don’t have a lot of inflation yet because the economy is still in the tank, and the Fed has so far resisted inflating away a lot of our unpayable debt. But that will not last.

            The economic streets are paved with roadkill who thought that things would always continue exactly the same way, and those who thought that a magical genii would pay the bills.

            But hey! You could be right, What a great thing that would be eh? Just forget all about economic theory and common sense, all we got to do is just keep borrowing and spending, The party will never end! Hoorah!

          • civildebate

            There are no problem with too much inflation in Japan. Japanese debt to GDP ratio is at a level that conventional economic theory says should cause hyperinflation and they have just the opposite: deflation.

            Conventional economic theory is just wrong.

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            Inflation is mostly a monetary phenomenon, so you will have no linkage to debt unless and until you begin to monetize the debt.

            However, being saddled with such a large debt is a huge drag on your economy as you have less wealth for needed governmental duties and yet taxes must remain high to service the debt.

            Japan has a unique political structure so they have resisted monetizing the debt. I doubt our politicians will have the same self restraint.

          • civildebate

            Inflation’s down, reports Jon Hilsenrath: “U.S. inflation is slowing after a surge early in the year. This is good news for Americans, as it means the money in their pockets goes further. It also is welcome at the Federal Reserve, which has been counting on an inflation slowdown. It gives the Fed some maneuvering room in 2012 if central-bank officials want to take steps to bolster economic growth. The slowdown has been apparent for months in some commodities. The price of copper is down 21% from a year earlier. Cotton is down 45%. Natural-gas prices continue to fall, and crude oil has retreated from peaks hit in April, though not as sharply as other commodities. Now, more broadly, the Commerce Department’s measure of consumer prices for November, released Friday, stood 2.5% above year-ago levels in November, down from year-over-year increases of 2.7% in October and 2.9% in September.”

            http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/wonkbook-on-debt-the-conventional-wisdom-vs-the-markets/2011/12/27/gIQAxwmJKP_blog.html

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            the reason we have have an inflation slowdown is because of commodity price drops. Due to the fact that all of the other world currencies are even shakier than our own.

            We thus have the advantage of being the “Safe haven” currency even though we can barely see our heads above water. This lowers commodity prices. It won’t last. We had an upsurge in inflation last year as Bernanke got involved in Quantitative easing. We have just been lucky so far.

            The political drive to inflate will be overwhelming as the debt service begins to eat a larger and larger portion of the budget.

          • After Seven

            Hi Civildebate,

            Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. Lenin was certainly right.–JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES, Essays in Persuasion

            I would ask you the following; If there is no inflation –

            Why has the cost of food doubled since STIM/ QE1/ QE2/ ZIRP? (take your pick, Milk, Cheese, Corn, Wheat)
            Why has the cost of gasoline doubled since STIM/ QE1/ QE2/ ZIRP? This is especially troubling given the spiraling global manufacturing decline…what could possibly have caused this?
            Why has the Dow Jones Index doubled since STIM/ QE1/ QE2/ ZIRP? Did American Companies invent a new widget?
            Why has the price of Gold Doubled since STIM/ QE1/ QE2/ ZIRP? Did we lose the world’s Gold supply, have billions of metric tons been misplaced? Lost? Stolen?

            Unless you can metabolize radio waves and run your automobile on tap water, the actual inflation rate is closer to 17%. So when you cite statistics, make sure you cite statistics for the prices of items that people are actually buying on a regular basis.

            Thus the increase in Food, Lodging and Commuting costs (Things Families MUST spend money on) has a Counter inflationary pressure on all other NON-ESSENTIAL Consumer Goods which are tracked by the Fed and DoL.

            So the numbers you are citing us C/o WaPo, are the costs of non-essential items…However, the important metric is the cost of necessary items (Gas, Food, Rent, Energy. You have the story 180 degrees wrong, which does not surprise me given the source.

            Example:
            Essential Items:
            Gasoline: $1.80/Gal before QE1, QE2 and ZIRP Today $3.50/Gal
            An excellent article on this exact issue showed up today – “High gasoline prices gulp more out of family budget” http://is.gd/kizroe
            Milk: $11.50/cwt before before QE1, QE2 and ZIRP today $20.0/cwt
            Corn: Prices rise at 60% annualized rate http://is.gd/1VYlMB
            Not surprisingly following the QE1 and QE2 money printing fiascos!
            Rent: Boston Rents up 15% 09 -11 http://is.gd/FWNVm1

            Ultimately QE1, QE2, and ZIRP have resulted in the following:
            Drastically increased Rent Prices,
            Drastically increased Food Prices
            Drastically increased Gasoline Prices
            Drastically increased Energy Prices.

            So you can believe what WaPo tells you or you can take a look at what’s right before your eyes at the gas pump or the grocery aisles of your local store.

            As for Greece, Japan and the USA…I defy you to list a single example of any society that has survived let alone thrived sustained periods (25 years +) of 100% Debt/GDP. Surely history has at least 1 example?

          • civildebate

            “As for Greece, Japan and the USA?I defy you to list a single example of any society that has survived let alone thrived sustained periods (25 years +) of 100% Debt/GDP. Surely history has at least 1 example?”

            That’s an intellectually dishonest trick question because the conditions in which Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) applies have only really existed since we left the gold standard in 1971. Secondly, 100% Debt to GDP and 25+ years are arbitrary choices.

            Well actually calling them arbitrary is giving you too much credit. You chose those specific numbers because Japan has been running 100%+ Debt to GDP for close to 20 years (and this year are at 225% Debt to GDP) with no signs of hyperinflation.

            The other part of your response deal with you committing a correlation = causation fallacy.

            None of your questions take into account that prices for Gas/Oil, DJI, Rent etc. were higher in the summer of 2008 or much lower after the bubble burst. You aren’t accounting for the changes in demand and speculation at all because to do so would be intellectually honest and show that monetary expansion isn’t the main reason for the price changes.

            http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=CRY:IND

            Look at the 5 year graph. Commodity prices are right where they were in 2007. You stating that they are higher than when we were in the middle of a massive recession as evidence for your case is, at best, intellectually dishonest.

          • melbedewy

            and their standard of living has been cut in half over the last 20 years.

    • warrior300

      What is happening is exactly the way the GOP leadership and most party members want it to happen. This is not a case of “stupid is as stupid does”. The Repugs are no more interested in budget cuts than the Demorats. It’s just the line of B.S. they have to hand out to their constituents. It will not end until as Ghostship stated, “…everything is hitting the fan”. No one is going to give up any privilege until they have no choice except by circumstances, then only God knows the outcome.

      Country club Repugs have more in common with progressives than with conservatives. Their wives and daughters have as many abortion notches as their liberal counterparts, and this group certainly has no problem with gay marriage, and disproportionate drug use. They tolerate social conservatives only because they are needed to put together anything that approaches a majority. They are oppose to higher taxes on their incomes, and hate welfare spending that doesn’t benefit them. Otherwise, they are much more comfortable with the limousine liberals and live the same kind of lifestyles at taxpayers’ expenses as Marie Antoinette (Take your pick Michelle My Bell or Nancy Pelosi) and Louie XVI Obama.

  • melbedewy

    “I guess we?re just going to have to wait until after it?s too late and everything is hitting the fan until America is forced to deal with reality. ”

    We just passed 100% Debt-GDP a couple of months ago. Under Obama’s spending programs, which include off-budget items like payroll tax, doc fix, 90% of the Bush tax cuts plus whatever “stimulus” and bailouts he comes up with, we will be at 120% Debt-GDP in around 4 years.
    This is the level Greece, Ireland, Japan, Italy and others have collapsed at.
    We should just shut it down, take the political hit and when the inevitable collapse happens the Democrats are on the hook for ALL the blame. Make no mistake about it-NO ONE is going to be able to bailout the world’s largest economy.

    • civildebate

      And the bond markets disagree with you.

      The debts of Greece, Ireland, and Italy are in a currency that’s essentially controlled by Germany.

      Japan’s problems weren’t due to debt but a liquidity trap, too much easy credit, and huge asset bubble.

      We all of our debt in a currency we control, the debt is not as much of a problem as you like to think it is.

      • ss396

        Whew! Thanks. I was getting worried that all this free government stuff was actually going to cost something. I’m glad that it’s going to be free after all. Thanks.

      • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

        “Only a liquidity trap? Too much easy credit? A huge asset bubble? Where have you been the last three years?

        • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

          I’m afraid that your definition of ‘debt’ is typical Wall Street banker-talk. For most of us, debt isn’t just something you have. It’s something you have to repay.

          Unless you’re a Wall Street banker. Then you get bailed out.

      • trapperjohn

        Now that I know that the debt isn’t a problem I’m waiting for them to lower our taxes and double the debt.. They might as well since it isn’t a problem.

        • melbedewy

          and introduce “Every man a Millionaire Act of 2012″ in the House. Give a cool million bucks to everyone since debt is “not such a problem”.
          How did Krugman sneak on this blog?

      • barleycorn

        Yes, he USA can run much more debt than most countries because the dollar is the de facto world reserve currency, but there is a limit past which lies destruction.

        In a sense we are the Banker in a giant Monopoly game. In an actual Monopoly game “the banker” is just a title and the player filling that role doesn’t get to use the bank’s assets for his own purposes.

        Theoretically we could devalue the dollar to about 1/100 of a peso and pay off all our creditors (many millions of whom are American citizens like you and I) with worthless paper.

        That would of course lead to severe unpleasantness all around.

        Yes, the debt is a big deal and getting bigger all the time.

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          The liquidity trap is a givaway. When the economy does not conform to the neo-keynsian theory they just invent something new to explain it.

          • civildebate

            I’m not a neo-keynsian but a MMTer. Regardless of that you hit on a crucial point, when the economy doesn’t conform to current theories then you need to realize those theories are at least partially wrong and start looking for a new or updated theory. You guys seem to be unable to do that despite all the doom and gloom stories of hyperinflation not coming true.

            According to you guys we should have been papering our walls with 20 dollar bills at this point.

  • heraklios

    He is 100% for Wall Street, the Big Banks and Big Government and 0% for ordinary people.

    • bdirks

      Say what you will about TARP, but the number one reason it was supported by rank and file politicians is because of the very real possibility that IRA, 401k, and other retirement accounts could have literally been literally wiped away in a matter of days if something had not been done.

      Was it right? There is no need to re-litigate it after it has already been done so to death, and I don’t need to bother saying that most people on this site would disagree. But the notion that, at least in the short term, it was somehow a way for the politicians (plenty of them good, like Paul Ryan) to stick it to the “ordinary man” is a bridge too far.

  • heraklios

    He is 100% for Wall Street, the Big Banks and Big Government and 0% for ordinary people.

    • circlegranch

      CNN’s Brian Todd reports for The Situation Room: (video of his report is at this link):

      www.mediaite.com/tv/and-so-it-begins-cnn-reports-on-romneys-riches-resulting-from-re-org-layoffs/

      The report suggests Mitt may have earned $3 million this year from his interest in Bain (Perhaps the reason why he is hesitant to release tax info? Although, he requested in ’94 that Ted Kennedy release his tax records, yet Mitt himself refused to do so.)

      “The Romney Economy” New York Magazine Oct 2011
      www.nymag.com/news/politics/mitt-romney-2011-10/

      • skorrent1

        Does your question imply?? Isn’t the function of a takeover/restructuring to get a company into profit status, no matter what it takes? And to make money for Bain in the process? You have a problem with this? Please remember that the primary purpose of a business is NOT to create jobs.

        You sound like you might be infected with the OWS virus, I recommend regular doses of Hayek.

        • snowshooze

          And that Romney will choke trying to explain how it works in the real world. He cannot take direct confrontation without buckling.
          He needs to prep for this because it is coming.
          And, Obama will eat his lunch on that detail. Every day.
          So, as a realist… this is business.
          Just try selling it.

  • inovrmihd

    a campaign issue, nothing will be accomplished.

    • snowshooze

      And I was looking forward to that.

  • DerKrieger

    …contributing to my 401k and started buying silver. 1 oz Walking Liberty dollars. Not sure why. Just feels right.

    • wennejunk

      They will always be 1 oz of silver.

      They will always have some intrinsic value, regardless of where the markets and currency goes.

      That’s what feels right in a shaky time when none of the known rules for investing and saving and getting ahead seem to work anymore.

      Nothing wrong with that.

    • skorrent1

      “It’s good to have an asset that is no one else’s liability.”

  • Right Reason

    . . .that it’s not simple incompetence on the part of the GOP leadership, but, insted, that they are not really interested in the same goals that we are? They don’t want to shrink the leviathan, they just want to be in control of it.

    • standingonthewall

      NT 55555555555

  • http://www.redstateeclectic.com enrique

    This is yet further proof that the GOP has been useless to support since after their epic fail on the Contract with America. No departments closed, spending wasn’t limited. We were told that we just needed the presidency and Senate. “Why no sane person could think that government spending would be controlled with just one half of one branch of government.”

    So we gave them the Senate, House, and presidency and what did we get? An explosion of spending and debt not seen since LBJ. I’m tired of being told limiting government from the GOP is right around the corner.

    Is the GOP better than the Democrats? I guess. Sort of like 40 below is better than 50 below zero with only a bath towel to keep you warm. Until I see someone honest and sincere to cut government growth or even halt its growth consider this conservative disengaged with Washington.

    And people here wonder why Ron Paul gets traction in Iowa. No matter how crazy a lot of his stuff is he at least wants to cut. No one else is saying that.

  • zooboy

    is for each of us to commit our time, effort and money toward finding and funding a real conservative challenger to EACH Republican who voted for the summer ‘deal’. That would be all except 28 Republican congressmen. Same for all the Republican senators except about 7 allies of Jim Demint.
    We need to elect a majority of each caucus in order to toss out Boehner and McConnell, who are intent on selling out our party and Republic. They are not stupid; WE are the stupid ones for electing the people who elected THEM.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    If we cannot muster the political will or acumen to fix the problem then the problem will eventually play itself out in ways we have no control over.

    What happens when the main reserve currency of the world becomes worthless?

    What happens when the banks go out of business and the average persons debit card/checks mean nothing anymore?

    Just wondering. I’d think the Democrats and Republicans would have a mutual vested interest in not collapsing the system but when both sides loot the treasury and/or let themselves be bribed so others can loot the system/maintain a political base the end of the Republic as it has been for the last several hundred years seems near. All because we let our controlling politicians/institutions to be shifted the left over a century of a cold war with communism/socialism etc.

  • rbdwiggins

    With deficit spending at nearly $6 billion/day and a faltering economy, the current debt limit will be reached somewhere around the middle of July or the beginning of August.

    Just in time for the National Conventions.

    Enter the new, improved, highly motivated and better funded Tea Party, and since economic conditions will continue to deteriorate throughout 2012 (The Keynesian Fraud notwithstanding.), the American electorate will be in no mood to tolerate class warfare.

  • DerKrieger

    …for a return to federalism as I’ve been writing about in my diary? DC will NOT downsize on its own. We will have to force it.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      He is the candidate who has written and spoken of federalism.

  • johnt

    and gets to play in the giant sand pit & playground known as the public purse, the work and lives of the population and productivity.
    It’s the Hastert method, including bridges to nowhere, highway spending, and assorted other stick ups.
    What else to expect from a Senate Minority leader who is chinless and was a doormat in earlier life and a House leader who goes orgasmic on 0.02% spending reductions, oh, and hugs Joe Biden in public.
    Best part, we still get to hear the primieval screams and wails from the Left about Republicans destroying the economy and the desperate need for more government & the benign influence of deficits.
    I always wondered what the inside of a nuthouse might look like.

  • Castor

    Ben Nelson just decided to go back to his roost instead of getting kicked out by the voters. The infamous cornhusker kick-backer just decided to not run for reelection. Now who will it be ? Stenberg or Bruening?

  • Samsara

    1. Change the retirement age for Social security to 70 for everyone starting yesterday.
    2. Allow the Bush tax cuts to expire, all of them.
    3. End Medicare part D
    4. Follow pay-go on all discressionary spending

    There now, that was simple.

    • melbedewy

      Plus end ALL foreign aid (yes this means Israel too), cut the defense budget in half, stop giving illegals and anchor babies a dime in benefits, an education or citizenship, etc.

    • onionman

      SS for those who are eligible.

  • lineholder

    to your efforts, did you see the USA Today article about increase in federal worker pay scales?

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2011-12-26/federal-starting-salaries/52236360/1

  • Joe Cor

    Hanging tough is not enough. Republicans also have to be able to do something more than utter a couple sentences with an uncomfortable look on their faces during these showdowns with the White House. When they just cede the message to the media and Obama, they leave themselves very little leverage to do anything but cave in one form or another. They have to learn to argue and to relish arguing. They have to argue with reporters and argue with the Democrats and Obama. They have to be confident enough and knowledgable enough to do this. As long as they continue not to be, the media pummelling will eventually wear them down and they will be left with no option but to cave.

    Boehner is an especially indifferent communicator. I think it’s one reason he looks so uncomfortable in the job. He won’t get his message out there and instead resorts to negotiating behind closed doors. As everyone except Boehner and the members of certain conservative cheerleading publications (let’s call them “The National Boehner”) could predict, closed-door negotiations with a man like Obama will inevitably lead to disaster. He disrupted the private negotiations and kept up a public campaign against Boehner, and Boehner did nothing in response but try flattering Obama a little.

    We need Republicans in leadership positions who don’t believe that their rightful place is the back of the bus. As long as they cling to their back of the bus mentality, they will balk at public confrontation with the Democrats and will inevitably resort to reaching out, closed-door negotiations, public flattery and searching for any type of “deal” they can hang their hats on.

  • Pingback: Your Questions About Learning To Read And Write Frederick Douglass | Pre School Learning to Write