« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Congressional Republicans Can and Must Force Obama’s Hand on Keystone Pipeline

Immediately prior to the congressional recess in December, Congress passed an inefficacious two-month extension of the Social Security tax cut.  Additionally, they reauthorized another two months of unprecedented long-term unemployment benefits, along with more spending for Medicare ‘doc fix.’  None of it, including the entitlement spending, was paid for in any meaningful way.

Nevertheless, you might ask, didn’t we get the Keystone pipeline as part of the deal?  Well, in reality we got nothing.

Last week, Obama announced that he will deny the requisite permit to TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline, a decision that will cost thousands of jobs, billions in revenue from royalties, and cheaper products for all consumers.  Even though Obama was required to issue the permit within 60 days of passage of the payroll tax deal last December, the text of the amendment (Title V) offered Obama the following loophole:

(b) Exception.–

(1) IN GENERAL.–The President shall not be required to grant the permit under subsection (a) if the President determines that the Keystone XL pipeline would not serve the national interest.

(2) REPORT.–If the President determines that the Keystone XL pipeline is not in the national interest under paragraph (1), the President shall, not later than 15 days after the date of the determination, submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, the majority leader of the Senate, the minority leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the minority leader of the House of Representatives a report that provides a justification for determination, including consideration of economic, employment, energy security, foreign policy, trade, and environmental factors.

Despite the fact that TransCanada has spent over three years complying with regulations and sundry environmental impact studies, Obama still has the power to issue a faux report deeming the pipeline a risk to our environment.  That is exactly what he will do this week.

This is yet another example of Republicans agreeing to pass a lousy bill on the credulous premise that there will be some ancillary benefit.  It turns out that the entire rationale for passing the bill – forcing Obama’s hand on Keystone – was erroneously conceived.

It is not too late to force Obama’s hand on the pipeline.  According to the latest CRS legal analysis, “[I]f Congress chose to assert its authority in the area of border crossing facilities, this would likely be considered within its Constitutionally enumerated authority to regulate foreign commerce.”  Even though presidents have broad authority to conduct foreign policy, the Keystone permit is more of an issue of foreign commerce.  Accordingly, CRS concluded that “whereas any independent presidential authority in matters affecting foreign commerce derives from the president’s more general foreign affairs authority, Congress’s power over foreign commerce is plainly enumerated by the Constitution, suggesting that its authority in this field is preeminent.”

In other words, Congress has plenary power to either absolutely force Obama to issue the permit or to issue it themselves.

The House should immediately pass Keystone legislation, either in a standalone bill or as part of other “must-pass” legislation.  They should ship it off to the Senate and let the 23 Democrats who are up for election stand before their constituents and kill job creation.  Not surprisingly, the overwhelming majority of voters agree.

Cross-posted to The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    The company is already in the process of submitting a revised route and the CEO even said he thinks it will be approved in time to stick to the same originally proposed construction timeline (ie start in early 13). I mean, I know this makes great political theater, but at the end of the day, this pipeline sure looks like it is going to be built.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-18/obama-administration-is-said-to-reject-transcanada-s-keystone-xl-pipeline.html

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      Had this occurred only three months into their efforts at getting this approved, that might be a safe assumption. 40 months and $1.9 billion later, there is a serious risk they will take their toys elsewhere.

      • doug1949

        I was wondering if someone could explain to me how keystone will lower gas prices, I was having a discussion with my liberal friends and couldn’t come up with anything. Thanks for the info.

  • snowshooze

    Bait and switch, or throw them a bone… on a string. And ” Our ” Congressmen bite every time.
    I believe the odds of this same bunch snookering Obama and issuing the permit are zero.
    And Obama again exercises authority he is not vested with.
    Ahhh.. maybe I am a bit cynical.
    But it ruined it for me when I found out there was no Easter Bunny.

    • jlsankot

      One would think that eventually they would catch on.

  • Kyle-MI

    And we will probably not the second until we get the first.

    The issue will not stay relevant if the House Republicans bulldoze it through. But go ahead, enjoy a Pyrrhic victory.

    • General_Confusion

      The go along get along angle has really paid off for us up to this point, why change course now. Let do something nice for Obama, say like cut him a blank check? oh wait? nevermind.

      Romney ? Boehner ? McConnell: The go along, get along dream team!

      • Kyle-MI

        It is not go-along-to-get along. It is called playing smart politics. It is called forcing the Dems to show their true selves, their radical leftist nature.

        It is because of you, the GOP is known as the stupid party. It is because of people like you, the Dems run rings around us with swing voters. during elections.

        • General_Confusion

          I?m such a rube, thanks for correcting me!

          Obamacare fully funded and utterly unencumbered! Stupendous!

          Obama free to spend as much as he wants in 2012 with the blessing of the House and Senate Republicans! Awesome!

          Military cuts locked in! Way to go!

          No overall spending UP! Brilliant!

          Smart politics that, and when the Super Duper Mega Awesome committee gets to work we?ll show ?em! Oh, wait, that bit of brilliance didn?t quite work out.

          Well there?s still the debt limit! Oh, wait, we made sure with the 2/3 vote requirement to stop it that, well, we actively made sure we couldn?t stop it!

          Pushing a slam dunk winner for the Keystone pipeline! Oh, bad optics can?t do that!

          You will forgive me, but I voted for Republicans to STOP (or at the very least make some attempt) to stop the Democrats not to cover their backs so they won?t have to make any embarrassing votes.

          To put it more succinctly, what is the point of winning elections if you?re just going to roll over for the other side? Looking good while doing so completely misses the point!

          Saying Vote for me, I?ll do nothing is not a winning strategy

    • General_Confusion

      The go along get along angle has really paid off for us up to this point, why change course now. Let do something nice for Obama, say like cut him a blank check? oh wait? nevermind.

      Romney ? Boehner ? McConnell: The go along, get along dream team!

      • snowshooze

        If we can convince Trans’Canada to hang in there just a few more months… then we will put them on the fast track…
        That’s the outfit that we Alaskan’s are paying 500 million for a pipeline study. We should be worth a favor.
        It would be, and I think it is, first rate campaign material.

  • Chango

    There’s simply no getting around the eventual veto, and Obama has nothing more to lose by using it than he has already risked. Also standing in the way is a bill passed by the Nebraska legislature and signed by the governor that requires a new route and environmental assessment. As suggested here, the first clumsy attempt to remedy this just caused more problems. In fact, it created more roadblocks to the permit process. I don’t believe another such effort is going to successfully circumvent Nebraska and events that have transpired since Obama first delayed the project last year. All that can be accomplished is more political theater, and it doesn’t appear to me that it’s resonating with most people, who can’t see much difference between a pipeline approved this year or next.

  • d_lamar

    When will we ever learn that our GOP is not on our side on this, or any other issue.

    • hoootie

      “In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a CONgress.” John Adams

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    How about overriding him and passing legislation that he is forced to veto instead? Then override the veto.

  • JimmyGee

    I can see the future! No REALLY I can! It’s becoming clearer….clearer….clearer…holy crap! This sucks! This just in from my future seeing, all knowing…omni-something….crystal ball.
    The pipeline goes to China, and the U.S government pays 20 billion to build it! It was tucked in another omnibus bill, that had to be passed before we would know what was in it!
    Oh and this just in….Congressman Bouyner says that it was a hard fought struggle with the President, but once he added the extra 10 billion to the package the president went for the deal. Bouyner is quite shocked…shocked! that the president went for the package. He thought he would have to add another 20 billion to the package. Bouyner stated, “I can’t believe the President went so cheap, this is a fine day for the GOP!”
    Yea! GOP!
    Stupid crystal ball……

    • jlsankot

      nt

  • grantjr

    I’m hoping that Obama keeps on reject this pipeline deal. No company(more so with a foreign one) should be able to use eminent domain to take land from American landowners when it is meant to do so for their own profit. If its not for highways and other lands that remain property of the people, it should not be allowed. If the Keystone makes such good business sense, then they should be able to come to terms with landowners. If not, they should not build it.

    • funwithknives

      where eminent domain was used in Nebraska, in this case? No coverage on this of any kind seems curious in light of Progressive attempts to squelch Key Stone .
      So, do us rubes a favor and illustrate your point , with some facts.
      { Izzat askin’ too much,grant jr ? }

      You point Re; taking for Gov’t, is laughable. Public Utility companies get this favor all the time. SCOTUS ruled it is permissable in the ‘Kelo’ appeal, forcing states to do it themselves. { even Michigan repealed their own infamous “Poletown” ruling.}

      *Should not*, and **is not currently…** are often the difference between *Fantasy* and **Reality**. The reality is there is no appreciable Federal Prohibition on your ’cause de’ jour’, and some states still are really weak on this topic.

  • Adjoran

    we don’t control the Senate. The Senate Majority Leader has almost total control of the floor schedule.

    We could have been rid of Harry Reid, but preferred the pure red meat. In the immortal words of Yogi Berra, “It’s like Deja Vu all over again!”

  • ag8tor

    Hugo Chavez started this way? I have an issue with ANY so-called president having this type of power. I also have an issue with a gutless congress (especially the Reps) that make deals with the devil. We were sold a bill of goods in 2010 because the Reps have kept it business as usual and have yet to grow a spine! This will continue until we control the House and senate. Why are the people of Nevada so in love with that little worm Harry Reid? McCain was one who wanted to “reach across the aisle” and work with the Dems. It cost him the presidency. Now I hear Romney talk about “reachjing across the aisle”. That’s why I’m now a registered Independent. Neither party has the nation’s well being in mind as evidenced by this pipeline fiasco.

  • bobguzzardi

    Until we, the people, elect fiscal common sense executives and legislators, we will get what we have been getting.

    It is, however, no easy thing to Bell that Cat.

    • hoootie

      If you always do what you’ve always done, you will always get what you have always gotten. If you want something you’ve never had, you’re going to have to do something you’ve never done.

  • http://www.political-woman.com politicalwoman

    According to a Bloomberg article, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-23/buffett-s-burlington-northern-among-winners-in-obama-rejection-of-pipeline.html, if fully factual, Obama’s buddy, Warren Buffet, benefits from the Keystone quash. His Berkshire Hathaway owns the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad, just ready, willing and able to transport oil, at a higher cost than pipeline transport, of course.

    • funwithknives

      plus Warren only pays 15% on his investment, when he cashes out.
      ’till then, NADA.
      When IS HE going to send that atonement check?

  • ihateliberals

    John Boehner doesn’t even deserve to be a congressman let alone the Speaker. he talks big but has yet to deliver anything good fo rhte Party. $100 billion cut to the 2011 budget ws promised by the Speaker and the Democrats only wanted $30 billion. After all the negotiations Boehner caved and went behind closed doors (another promise broken) and made a deal for $33 billion cut. Every single ssue that comes up Boehner fails at. Then in the Senate you have McConnell and McCain helping the Democrats. I still can’t believe AZ would send McCain back to the senate after his failings.

    • adair

      On Fox News Sunday, John Boehner said, “Everything is on the table!” And he said it, oh, two or three times!

      Well sure, then! That means, since he had a sly look on his face, too, that THIS time the Republicans are really going to stick it to ‘em!

      Pathetic.

  • blackhawk

    would Obama allow the pipeline???That would hurt his brothers in Islam in the Arab countries.
    He has to go before it’s to late.

  • joeyjojoshabadoo79

    Completely counterproductive. Please try harder next time.