« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Real Problem With Romney’s Comments

Yesterday, Mitt Romney caused a stir when he made the following remarks about the poor during an interview with CNN:

“I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs a repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich…. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

Following this comment, CNN anchor Soledad O’Brien prodded Romney to clarify his remarks.

“We will hear from the Democrat party, the plight of the poor…. You can focus on the very poor, that’s not my focus…. The middle income Americans, they’re the folks that are really struggling right now and they need someone that can help get this economy going for them.”

The media, Democrats, and many Republicans are painting him as out-of-touch, while expressing their concern that he is apathetic to the plight of the poor.  However, they are missing the point.  The real outrage is not that he doesn’t want to do more for the poor; it’s that he thinks they are taken care of with the welfare state.  Worse, he believes that the welfare state is, more or less, functioning properly.  Fear not, ‘any minor glitches would be repaired by Mr. Fix It.

It is precisely this sentiment that makes Romney disqualified for the Republican nomination.  Romney doesn’t believe that the welfare system is fundamentally flawed; that the welfare state is the consummate enemy of the poor; that unlimited welfare is what perpetuates and exacerbates poverty.  He thinks it is working relatively fine, albeit in need of some minor tweaks here and there.

As Senator DeMint noted, this could have been a teachable moment – a moment for Romney to shine.  He could have gone on offense by explaining how it is these very welfare programs that have failed to deracinate poverty, even though they have been in place for decades.  He could have shown how the only thing that is stimulated by these programs is the dependency of the program itself.  $30 billion spent on food stamps gives rise to $60 billion, which now gives rise to $80 billion.  He could have defended the inherent compassion of conservative free-market policies in weaning people off these programs and creating upward mobility.

As conservatives, we care deeply about the poor.  Then again, we care for everyone equally.  We don’t recognize a class system – one that Romney has propagated incessantly throughout the campaign.  It is that conviction that burns in the heart of every conservative who desires to fundamentally overhaul the welfare state and the cycle of dependency and poverty.

We care immensely about the millions of poor who are condemned to a life of failure because they are trapped in the public education system perpetuated by teachers’ unions and the Democrats.  We cry out for those who cannot afford healthcare because the liberals have destroyed the free market.  We empathize with those who can no longer afford food, gas, and utilities because liberals have artificially inflated the prices with government interventions.  We sympathize with those who can’t find jobs that fit their skill set because liberal environmentalists have eliminated their jobs.

As conservatives, we are not happy to merely be efficient stewards of Medicaid, LIHEAP, Food Stamps, Unemployment, and TANF to deal with the aforementioned problems.  We seek to solve those problems by offering an equal opportunity for everyone to earn a living with dignity; not by offering capricious politicians the opportunity to grow dependency, and by extension, their own power.

Only one who is insouciant towards the plight of the poor – whether Republican or Democrat – can feel content with the core structure of the current welfare/entitlement state.   Such a person is satisfied with trite incremental tinkering of the system.  Mitt Romney personifies that caricature.  That is why his solution to poverty it to manage the welfare state…and raise the minimum wage requirement.

Is this the man we want as our spokesperson during an election over the economy?

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • WillWong

    Contrast this with what Newt said about Obama, food stamps, and jobs back in the SC’s Foxnews debate exchange with Juan Williams……

    I am really hoping that peoples’ eyes be open to see that Romney is no conservative. Krauthammer said that Romney came to the party late, meaning his late conversion to conservatism. It is arguable whether Romney even came to the party. Could well be that he may have been coached to rehatch conservative talking points.

    • angryguy77

      If you don’t vote for mitt if he’s the nominee, you’re an idiot to some here at RS. You are supposed to vote for him no matter if he’s a conservative or not, You see, it makes perfect sense to throw one liberal out and replace him with another and screw our chances of trying to get a true conservative in the WH in 2016.

      This is why he will not get my vote if he’s the nominee. I don’t believe he will be that much better than Obama.

      • WillWong

        Also perfectly ok to primary him in 2016 if he governs the wrong way! Just cannot imagine what will be left of the country with 4 more years of Obama.

        That said, i am convinced that Newt can still beat Romney….especially if God fearing people all over the country cry out to God for mercy on this nation.

  • mikelindell2

    Of Romney’s “conservatism” is intermittently interrupted by his true beliefs. Because of this enormous facade he has to put on, he regularly missteps rendering him unelectable. Not that it matters because even if he were elected, he’d govern identically to Obama making it senseless to even support to run against Obama. So much for the establishment’s narrative that Newt’s the erratic one…

  • creinstein

    Obama and Romney share the same history

    Appointed liberal judges
    Passed socialized healthcare
    Raised taxes
    Increased healthcare costs
    Increased size of Government

    I could go on but two hours rest is not enough.

    Romney is Obama, and Obama is Romney.

    We should be running away from this guy like he is a Ferengi with an awesome snake oil deal.

    Don’t make a Mitt-Stake!

  • politicalqrm

    to scrimp and save, is woefully out of touch with America. His referral to “the poor” made it seem as if we have a caste system.

    While there are some people (of their own choice) that want to live a life off the taxpayers, “poor” is not something that most Americans aspire to be a part of or want to carry with them all their lives.

    To those who are in deep financial straits and want to get out of them, Romney’s words do not give them much hope.

    Maybe that’s why I support Newt.

    • mikelindell2

      Exactly. Newt doesn’t make mistakes like this and he is the last conservative leader this country has had. You know if Newt gets in he’ll force this country back on the right track. Romney isn’t even proposing areal tax reform plan in the primary, imagine how much he’d embarrass us & sell us out in the general?

      • Spartan4Life

        Whenever either one of them has a little success they make the mistake of letting their egos convince them that they are really loved. Since neither one of them is what I consider a true believer in the Conservative revolution, they both are prone to gaffes as soon as they let their guard down(see colonization of the moon/not caring about the poor).

        Look, we are stuck with these two. I have been saying since last spring that this is a weak field. It still is. Get used to it because no matter which one of these bozos wins this debacle we have about 10 more of these beat your head against the wall moments coming.

        It is a shame because a good Conservative candidate would be crushing Obama right now.

        • joereagan

          If Newt Gingrich is not a “true believer in the Conservative revolution”, there is no such thing.

          • Spartan4Life

            Don’t let the facts get in the way of your narrative.

          • mikelindell2

            Stop watching Fox and do some research, son. And no, I don’t care who he has ever sat on a couch with

  • majorwiblit

    I am taking myself off your list,,,Morning briefing,,etc,,etc,,

    “Watching a hippie protester get tased just makes my day.”

    You,,my son,,,are an ***hole!!
    And please Ban me,,,I could give a flying ****!!!

    Edited for language. -Jeff

    • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

      I read backgrounder and still don’t know.

      “Watching a hippie protester get tased just makes my day.”

      Erick Erickson: Occupy DC Protester Getting Tasered Is ‘Hilarious,’ ‘Makes My Day’

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/erick-erickson-cnn-contributor-occupy-dc-protester-tased_n_1246573.html

    • jakeofalltrades

      :D

  • General_Confusion

    Seeing as he is the anointed one and our enviable nomine maybe he want to move quickly away from those Tea Party rubes and firm up his moderate bona fides. After all it is a knownfact? a conservative can NEVER win political office. Only Democrat echoes stand a chance.

    • uncmike

      fleeing to the left where he is clearly more comfortable.

  • General_Confusion

    Seeing as he is the anointed one and our enviable nomine maybe he want to move quickly away from those Tea Party rubes and firm up his moderate bona fides. After all it is a knownfact? a conservative can NEVER win political office. Only Democrat echoes stand a chance.

  • scottishjew

    Romney is not a Republican. He ran in the MA Republican primary because he couldnt break into the long line in the Democratic primary. And once he became governor, he reverted to what he was…. a democrat. Blumberg did the same thing in New York.

    But the Republican Party is not his party. He could give of fig about it and conservatives. It is simply a vehicle to accomplish his manifest destiny to become president. Think about what he is doing. He is actually sending out Republican congressman to Newt’s events to disrupt his events. He is sending out all sorts of ex-”Republcans” , not to say why Mitt should be elected, but to trash a fellow Republican personally. He’s done enough damage to the party that conservatives like me will never vote for him. What does he care what damage he does to the party? He’s not a Republican.

  • mkozikowski

    A person so out of touch with main stream reality, as is Mr. Romney, to understand the basic philosophy err he made in his ‘Class Warfare’ statement.

    It almost sounds like ‘…. Let them eat cake…’.

    This revelation, together with his promise to ‘Fix’ ObamanyCare will be his undoing against the media/liberal/Obama machine.

    Woe to us if he is the ‘Conservative(?)’ candidate.

  • sethellis

    I disagree with those that come out and say his true colors are shining. His position is not indicative of any ideology. Both sides have strong opinions on the issue. Romney simply doesn’t care. He’s not a politician, and only cares about policy as it relates to the issues at hand.

    This is a great opportunity for everyone. For Mitt it gives an opportunity to form policy on the fly as needed. He needs to backtrack and explain what role welfare should really play. It’s a weakness he has to overcome to be president. For us it’s an opportunity to show that we can guide Romney to the right place when needed. No better time to practice working together in the party to create effective conservative policy.

    • acat

      It’s also interesting that media coverage of Romney’s gaffes ramps up just as he’s closing in on a clinch of the nomination, don’cha think?

      Mew

      • mikelindell2

        He’s an outsider. Don’t let the fact that his father ran for president, his mother for senate, Mitt himself has been running for office since 1994, and that every failed Washington insider has endorsed him get in the way of his “outsiderdom’

      • sethellis

        Perhaps I should refine my comments, because despite his background Romney is a politician.

        Romney does not approach ideology the same way we do. For many out is about what fits correctly into the world as we understand it. There is also the politician angle that seeks to craft their ideas into a narrative that draws in the electorate. We see an idea an immediately start to analyze how it fits with conservative philosophy and public sentiment.

        Romey only sees policy as it relates to solving a problem. He says he has become more conservative over time, and it seems that’s because he learned that we simply had the best solutions. He had yet to learn that the best solutions by their very nature are conservative.

        Welfare was reformed in the 90′s. We haven’t hard much from it since then. Hence in Romney’s mind he doesn’t have to worry about.

        As for the media, I don’t understand why you brought it up, but it should be clear to everyone by now that they just want to keep the race close. Romney had to win Florida. Hence the media practically ignored late breaking stores like the new documentary released by Gingrich’s pac on Monday. Now that Mitt accomplished what he needed to, the media will go back to hitting him as hard as they can to prevent a runaway. They don’t care who wins as long as they make money.

        • acat

          then .. yes, you should refine your comments, ideally before posting them.

          Unless you’re secretly Willard Romney, posting under an alias, your attempts to state what’s on his mind are rather pointless. The Romney statement under question can also be explained by “He’s got a tin ear” … and Occam says that’s more likely.

          As for the media, I brought it up because they’re going to be going after Willard in the general, and I find it curious that – at the point when Romney has just about clinched the nomination – they start.

          Mew

        • edintexas

          That’s true. Those who have no principles also have no ideology beyond personal aggrandizement. Romney has proven he lacks firm principles, the rest follows.

  • courdeleon02

    The media have seized a partial snipit of what Romney said and has turned it around to be a campaign ad for Obama.The full content of his commets tells the truth of whatt was said. Yes,” the poor you always have with you,” a quote from Jesus Christ. I wonder if the media would attack Chirst. No doubt the main stream media is pulling for Obama so what they say must be dismissed as propaganda from the left.Romney is so correct in his observations that it is the middle class that have suffered the most in this economic downturn because these folks have no social safety net to fall back on like the poor who have not experienced any loss of benefits. If you have kids in college with rising tuition,a job where you have had no increase in salary with your taxes going up you have less to spend so you are hurting.The media are absolutely disgusting and be mindlfull that studies have confirmed that 80% of those in news journalism are liberal democrats. Enough said.

    • texashistorian

      though Dan’s point in the article is correct- the story ought to be about fundamentally altering the welfare state and downsizing it- but if we needed any more evidence that Obama will kill Romney in a general election, this is it.

      As I said, we all got what Mitt was saying here, but it was poorly articulated, and he missed a hell of a shot to really go after the issue of entitlement spending and the welfare state. If we are complaining now about media treatment, wait for the general- the Axelrod smear machine will take every little incident like this (and with Romney there will be many) and chew him up.

      • edintexas

        Romney is in favor of the “safety net”. If there is a problem with the safety net, Romney will “fix it”.

        The Conservative answer is to help people out of poverty, reducing the need for the “social safety net”. That is not what Romney was even close to trying to say. Yes, the poor will be with us always, but we can try to reduce the incidence of poverty. And, it is worth pointing out, Christ wasn’t talking about a government safety net. Christ charged each of us with a personal responsibility for charity, not having the government take on the task by taking from Peter to support Paul.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    http://www.redstate.com/rsklaroff/2012/02/02/the-donald-is-to-endorse-the-newt/

    Trump Intends to Endorse Gingrich, Source Tells AP
    Wednesday, 01 Feb 2012 10:06 AM

    Read more on Newsmax.com: Trump Intends to Endorse Gingrich, Source Tells AP

    BREAKING:

    An AP story that quoted a ?source? close to the Gingrich campaign
    indicating that billionaire Donald Trump will endorse Newt Gingrich
    today is inaccurate.

    A senior source with the Gingrich campaign says the former House
    Speaker has no plans to meet with Trump today. The campaign
    also denied making the claim to the AP.

    The Drudgereport reports Trump will endorse Mitt Romney at
    a press conference Thursday afternoon in Las Vegas.

    The original story below:

    LAS VEGAS ? Real estate mogul and reality show star Donald Trump intends to endorse Gingrich?s GOP presidential bid, according to a source close to Gingrich?s campaign.
    Trump is set to announce his support Thursday in Las Vegas, where Gingrich is campaigning in advance of Nevada?s Republican caucuses on Saturday.

    Trump?s backing would bring the former House speaker a blitz of media attention heading into the contest and following his defeat in Florida.

    Trump announced Wednesday that he was to make news in the presidential race but did not say what it was.

    Asked about the possible endorsement Wednesday in Reno, Nev., Gingrich said he had ?no idea what The Donald is going to do.?

    ?He is always interesting,? Gingrich said of Trump. ?And I don?t know of anybody who does a better job of getting attention by announcing that he will presently announce something.?

    Gingrich sought Trump?s endorsement at a meeting in December at the real estate mogul?s Trump Tower office in Manhattan. There, Gingrich told reporters he had persuaded Trump to mentor promising children from some of New York?s poorest schools.

    The former House speaker had come under fire for suggesting poor children should do janitorial chores in their schools to learn the value of work.

    Gingrich also agreed to appear in a Republican debate Trump was to host in Iowa in December. But other candidates, including frontrunner Mitt Romney, turned down the debate, forcing Trump to cancel.

    Trump had flirted with the idea of jumping in the presidential race as a third-party candidate but ultimately decided not to.

    Appearing on CBS? ?Face The Nation? on Sunday, Trump praised Gingrich.

    ?He?s got great ideas. He?s very smart, he?s very tough and he is a great debater,? he said.

    Gingrich was pounded by Romney in Florida in Tuesday?s Republican primary. Romney is considered a heavy favorite in Nevada, a state he won when he sought the GOP nomination in 2008.?

    The source was not authorized to speak for the campaign and spoke on condition of anonymity. The endorsement was first reported by KLAS-TV in Las Vegas.

    Read more on Newsmax.com: Trump Intends to Endorse Gingrich, Source Tells AP
    Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama?s Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

    http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Gingrich-Trump-Endorse-Republican/2012/02/02/id/428251?s=al&promo_code=E166-1

    • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

      …but the tea-leaves look promising, particularly when it’s recalled that Mitt ducked-out the back-way after having met @ Trump Tower.

      http://www.cnbc.com/id/46236655

      Trump to Endorse Gingrich? Romney?
      Published: Thursday, 2 Feb 2012 | 10:12 AM ET
      By: Martin Steinberg
      Copy Editor, Enterprise, CNBC.com

      Major media organizations reported that Donald Trump is set to endorse Newt Gingrich’s GOP presidential bid on Thursday. But wait! Others say he’s endorsing Mitt Romney. The Donald is keeping ‘em guessing.

      The New York Times and The Associated Press, citing Gingrich campaign officials, said Wednesday night that the real estate mogul and reality TV show host would make his announcement on Thursday in Las Vegas.

      The website POLITICO also reported it, but on Thursday, it backtracked. Citing Matt Drudge of the website Drudge Report, who has a relationship with top Romney officials, POLITICO’s Maggie Haberman said Trump may actually be endorsing Romney.

      Asked about the possible endorsement Wednesday in Reno, Nev., Gingrich said he had “no idea what the Donald is going to do.”

      “He is always interesting,” Gingrich said, according to AP. “And I don’t know of anybody who does a better job of getting attention by announcing that he will presently announce something.”

      Stay tuned for the midday announcement.

    • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

      http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/02/trump-guarantees-an-endorsement-circus-likely-backing-113259.html

      Trump guarantees an endorsement circus, likely backing Romney

      Comments (68) By MAGGIE HABERMAN | 2/2/12 9:25 AM EST

      We reported, along with the New York Times and the Associated Press among others, last night that Donald Trump is expected to endorse Newt Gingrich, according to sources around his campaign. The Times went first with the news in terms of national outlets.

      What a difference 12 hours makes – Trump’s endorsement is not likely to go to Gingrich, others said, and may in fact go to Mitt Romney when he makes his announcement at 11:30 a.m.

      Matt Drudge, who has a relationship with top Romney officials, this morning – linking to our Gingrich story – was the first to indicate it would be Romney.

      The endorsement of Romney would come after serious lobbying from some supporters of the frontrunner, according to several sources.

      It would also make more sense, since Trump typically tends to like to go a with a winner.

      That said, going with Gingrich would have made it still potentially possible for Trump to continue flirting with a third-party run.

      Also worth noting? Romney essentially hid from view after his meeting with Trump in New York City, as cameras awaited him outside one door. Romney slid out a different entrance.

    • courdeleon02

      The media fell for the bait. Trump to endorse Romney its official form sources in the Romney campaign. Trump and Mitt meet in Vegas and the deal was sealed. The media agian look like fools. Once again the Donald has faked out the Press. I love it!. Donald Trump to Newt gingrich ” YOUR FIRED.”

      • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

        …as he attacks Mitt for his support of the minimum-wage being pegged to the cost-of-living.

  • youngsterz

    Isn’t that what conservatives would love to see, only 5% of Americans on government assistance? Then why all the fuss on a poorly articulated sentiment, when the underlying sentiment is probably something that true conservatives actually agree with!

    We all espouse personal responsibility. Romney is saying (again, very poorly worded) that he’s OK with the government helping out the bottom 5%. I’m OK with that as well. It’s the 5% – 25% range where we need to make some cuts.

    There are 46 million Americans on food stamps. It was only about 17 million in 2001. Current US population of 312 million; 5% of that would be under 16 million. I’d be OK with that!

    http://www.dailyjobsupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Food-Stamps-Yearly.jpg

    • edintexas

      If you were a Conservative, you would understand the difference between the Conservative position and supporting government welfare.

  • jc230

    The inherent problem with Romney is his overall strategy to the WH, which is to destroy his competition by “investing” money in attack ads. Money, and lots of it is the Romney solution to win, not ideas on how to create economic prosperity, reduce government bureaucracy and spending. Focusing on these areas will support ALL Americans, not just one macro demographic. I remain pessimistic that the Republicans will win the presidency. Republican voters, Floridians in particular, must take ownership for listening to the mainstream conservative media bias commentary about Romney, and for being persuaded by million dollar superficial-attack ads. Too bad Americans are too easily led by false prophets.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46233761#.Tyq7LVxSRBE

    AP sources: Trump intends to endorse Romney

    By BETH FOUHY, KASIE HUNT

    LAS VEGAS ? Three Republican officials are telling The Associated Press that Donald Trump intends to endorse Mitt Romney’s presidential bid. Trump plans to make the announcement Thursday afternoon at his casino hotel in Las Vegas.
    The surprise development comes even though Newt Gingrich had informed close advisers Wednesday night that he had expected to win the real estate developer’s support.
    The GOP officials spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to pre-empt Trump’s announcement.

    • Juggernaut

      Trump has beclowed himself and laughed at during the Presidents Correspondence dinner. I don’t think any candidate could benefit. Unless Trump walked away and avoided commenting, his mouth has a way of ending up with his foot inside.

      • carolynr

        While I do not go along with all the arguments of the birther issue….
        look at this:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw

        I realize that there is drama here…but look at the bills presented!

      • WillWong

        Looks like Trump has succumbed to the electability issue. Wasn’t that hard to figure him out. You just have to get through his gimmicks! Not sure if his endorsement is a benefit! 27% said his endorsement will make it less likely for them to vote for that candidate while 10% said they are more likely to vote. Most said no effect! I would imagine his $$$$$$$ meant more!

        • Juggernaut

          for another boring year.

      • Ann_W

        Look, I think he’s a clown, too, and don’t care about his endorsement. But this is sour grapes. Newt’s people were slobbering all over themselves announcing that Trump would endorse him. Then when Trump didn’t, you’re going to say, “We didn’t want his endorsement anyway.” LOL

        • Juggernaut

          to get a response, then they go to Romney. There’s an AP update from Newt’s camp saying they have no meeting this afternoon, so now the drama queens in the media go to guessing Romney. I suppose Santorum is next.

          • Ann_W

            Detroit was having race riots, so G. Romney was reaching out to people who could help him with that. If Alinsky had influence in this area, why would he not be willing to meet with him. Rules for Radicals was published in 1971 so G. Romney would not have even had access to all his radical notions, but even if he did, he was trying to do something about race riots and thought this community organizer could help him. But you’ll tar him for being an admirer of Alinsky for that.

            Then because the G. Romney had one contact with Alinsky in the context of getting help for race riots, his son gets tagged as “influenced by Alinsky.”
            The most ridiculous thing I’ve heard all day, and I get up early.

          • Aaron Gardner

            ntntnt

          • Ann_W

            Sons aren’t held responsible for the sins of their fathers.

          • Juggernaut

            This is the same man who claimed to be both moderate and progressive. As for tarring, he deserves it considering the kind of campaign he’s running. Don’t worry, I’ll change the Sig soon but people should know plus haven’t conservatives tarred Obama since 2007?

          • Aaron Gardner

            Your chosen scriptural rebuke is a non-sequitor. I wasn’t holding Mitt responsible for George’s actions. I was making a judgement on George’s actions only.

            I suppose I could rebuke you with Exodus 20:16, but I think the effort would be wasted.

  • edintexas

    Romney has doubled down in pointing out he has no Conservative bonafides. He supports automatic increases in the Minority Youth Unemployment Statute, AKA Federal Minimum Wage.