« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Governors Branstad and Brownback Spew Hot Air for Big Wind

After billions in stimulus funding failed to transform impotent green energy sources into profitable endeavors, even Obama has taken a break from promoting Wind and Solar.  He is even talking more about oil and gas exploration, although his sincerity is in serious doubt.  Unfortunately, some Republicans have not relinquished their affinity for using public funds to prop up their local wind industry.

Yesterday, Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad and Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback sent a letter to the 20 members of the payroll tax cut conference committee imploring them to extend the Production Tax Cut (PTC) for Big Wind, set to expire at the end of the year.  They warned that “wind development will grind to [a] halt due to the uncertainty of a PTC extension.”

The PTC is among 51 ‘tax extenders’ that have either expired last December or are slated to expire this December.  It grants a 2.2 cent/per kilowatt-hour refundable credit for wind, solar, or geothermal.  Believe it or not, that is a large sum of money.  According to the Heritage Foundation, if the oil industry received a commensurate subsidy, they would get a $30 check for every barrel produced.  The PTC is tantamount to an Earned Income Tax Credit for corporations.

As such, the governors are probably correct to assume that Big Wind will grind to a halt without the credit.  And that’s how it should be in our free-market economy.  Why is this any different than Obama’s attempt to pick winners and losers?  Actually, in this instance, we would be picking losers as winners.  While ending the tax credit will probably bring down Big Wind, it’s not like the subsidy actually helped Wind become prosperous.  In 2010, wind accounted for 0.9% of our energy supply, geothermal 0.2%, and solar 0.1%.  Many states offered their own tax credits to the wind industry, and lost money.  In Texas, the property tax break alone cost the state $1.6 million per job created.

What we really need to do is to let all targeted tax breaks expire, especially to those industries that have no tax liability to begin with.  Last year, Congressman Mike Pompeo (R-KS) introduced legislation (HR 3308) to sunset all non-universal energy tax credits and grants, including those for fossil fuels and nuclear power.  The bill would use the savings from the repeal of these credits (roughly $90 billion over ten years) to lower the corporate tax rate on everyone, including green energy companies (to the extent that they pay taxes at all). HR 3308 has 18 co-sponsors, including Paul Ryan.  It should garner the support of the entire caucus.

Yesterday, Senators DeMint and Lee introduced the bill in the Senate.  We should urge everyone to cosponsor the bill.

When we’re trying to draw bold contrasts to Obama on the issue of venture socialism, the last thing we need is members from our party muddling the distinction by offering their constituents an echo, instead of a choice.

Cross-posted From The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • Scope

    is in the same wind bag. Gov. McDonnell is requesting about $500,000 from the VA taxpayers to promote a wind energy project off the coast of VA. Chris Christie is also doing a wind energy project off the NJ coast. In the past Christie was trying to find a manufacturer to produce the turbines in NJ. Don’t know if he ever found anyone.

    Why are Republican Governor’s getting down with something that has already proven to be a losing proposition? I remember a diary here talking about the disastrous waste of money, and particularly when the wind mills are built in salt water.

    • BA Cyclone

      of windmill parts. So that in part is why Branstad is stumping for the subsidy.

      It doesn’t necessarily make it right or conservative, but that is the reasoning behind the action on his part, I am sure.

    • BA Cyclone

      of windmill parts. So that in part is why Branstad is stumping for the subsidy.

      It doesn’t necessarily make it right or conservative, but that is the reasoning behind the action on his part, I am sure.

  • creinstein

    In Oregon the windmills kill so many Hawks, Eagles, and other birds…

    Solar requires constant backup from Natural Gas… So it is just taking up huge swaths of land for no real gains..

    Most of these companies cannot even survive on their own.

    • Locked and Loaded

      The wind industry has a problem that will never go away. Bats and migratory birds prefer areas of greatest wind potential, the same areas in which are located the killer turbines.

      This point should be pounded mercilessly into the heads of any and all environmentalists and subsidizers.

  • romeg

    They warned that ?wind development will grind to [a] halt due to the uncertainty of a PTC extension.?

    This is an outright admission that without taxpayer funded subsidies, there is no future for this boondoggle.

    Not even Boone Pikens believes that this “industry” is economically viable on its own. The same is true of his plan to convert the US OTR truck fleet to CNG.

    There may be other sound arguments that can be made for these technologies, including those based on air quality/environmental issues but the purely economic case cannot be made.

    • Locked and Loaded

      but – Boone Pikens – that’s good.

  • renl57

    …would eliminate special subsidies for ALL forms of energy, including oil and nuclear.

    For years, liberals have been using a “beggar thy neighbor” argument: Since nuclear power has been heavily subsidized by the Federal Government since the “Atoms for Peace” program in the 1950s, why shouldn’t “green” energy be subsidized too?

    The right answer is that none of these should be subsidized.

    There is one indirect subsidy that Big Oil does get: The protection of the U.S. military.

    In 1987, President Reagan announced that the U.S. Navy would protect supertankers transiting the Persian Gulf–even foreign supertankers under Liberian and other flags. That keeps oil prices lower than they would otherwise be if instability in that area threatened oil traffic.

    I wonder how high gasoline prices would go if the U.S. announced that henceforth, oil companies would have to hire their own freebooters to protect their supertankers–at a time when saber-rattling between Iran and Israel has increased.

  • freemanja1991

    We need more hawks to be killed.

    • BA Cyclone

      kidding!

      I rather enjoy seeing the *real* hawks out and about in my neighborhood.

      Last week, I saw a bald eagle just standing by the side of the road. Amazing. Closest I have ever been to one that wasn’t in a zoo or something.

      Truthfully though, these industries need to stand on their own. The subsidies need to STOP and the market should price them accordingly.

      • freemanja1991

        The amount of Chicken Hawks in this state is detrimental and unhealthy to have this many high level predators. It also cost revenue due to less pheasant populations, but DNR keeps lying to us about how the lack of birds is due to weather.

  • rechts

    I’d rather spend a million Dollars on a windmill in Iowa then send even one more penny to the likes of Venezuela, Russia, and the Middle East.

    Wind may not be the answer, but it is worth exploring and investing in all forms of energy in order to secure energy independence. ‘Drill baby drill’ is just not enough long term..

  • pacajka

    Windmills are not the answer without more work. Look at how the British windmills malfunctioned, caught fire and fell apart in high wind gusts. We don’t need this here.
    Sea winds carry salt that can be corrosive to any machinery. Windmills sited on the coastline need attention to corrosion effects of the environment.