« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Clark Durant for Michigan Senate

Editor’s note: Earlier this year, I promised to harness our collective outrage against the GOP establishment by searching out candidates to support – men and women who will uphold our first principles.  Unfortunately, we have been too busy dealing with capitulation after capitulation on the major legislative battles.  That is about to change.  Over the next few months, I will be seeking out conservative candidates for The Madison Project (my other daytime job) and bringing them to the Red State community.  Your suggestions are much appreciated. Together we can get this done.

As conservatives, we have been frustrated by the fact that there is such a dearth of intellectual firepower among our elected Republicans.  Very few Republicans have the ability to articulate conservatism from a position of strength.  Unfortunately, this shows in their voting record.  Someone who fails to articulate conservatism as a candidate is bound to vote along with GOP leadership as an elected member of Congress.  This is why we need more candidates like Clark Durant in the Senate.

Clark Durant has been articulating conservatism long before he decided to run for public office.  During the 1970s, Durant worked at Hillsdale College and helped start Imprimis, one of the best conservative publications.  In the ‘90s, he helped found a network of charter schools that have had a positive impact on education in inner city Detroit.  While many Republicans struggle with the issues of education, Durant will be able to clearly articulate the superiority of private enterprise over government control in the education system.

Durant is a comprehensive conservative who possesses the requisite knowledge of history, policy, and the Constitution to properly articulate conservative principles in this Democrat-leaning state.  His campaign has already excited Tea Partiers in Michigan.  He has raised $1.3 million in just four months against a better-known opponent.

Durant’s main opponent for the Republican nomination, scheduled for August 7, is former Congressman Peter Hoekstra.  While Hoekstra served with distinction as Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, he has a terrible voting record on fiscal issues.  He voted for TARP, raising the debt ceiling, and every bailout under the sun.  At a time when we are trying to preclude the next highway trust fund bailout, we need not support the man who voted for the original bailout in 2008.

Undoubtedly, it is an uphill battle to win a Senate seat in Michigan.  But we certainly won’t gain any traction by running retreads that embody the very vices we rail against on a daily basis.  It’s time to make some bold “out-of-the-box” choices, which is why we’re going with Clark Durant in Michigan.  We need someone who will stand up to Big Labor in Michigan and Big Government in Washington.  Our guys need reinforcements – big time.  Clark Durant will join our small group of stars in the Senate.

Earlier this week, Senator Mike Lee endorsed Durant for Senate.  At the Madison Project, we are proud to announce our support for Clark Durant and our contribution to his campaign.  Please join us in nominating an unvarnished conservative to take on Debbie Stabenow in November.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • dfaith

    Does Durant support the auto-bailout? I am personally opposed to it, but I don’t how we can win a Michigan Senate race with a candidate who is opposed to it.

  • miconservative

    Is going absolutely nowhere. Ran the same campaign against now Attorney General Bill Schuette in 1990 trying to get the Senate nomination to run against Carl Levin and lost. Will lose again.

    I just love the idea of trying to sell the Grosse Pointe bow tie wearing grandson of an auto magnet as the Tea Party candidate. And Durant is not the favorite of the Tea Party. Social conservative leader, and also a nutcase, Gary Glenn seems to be the guy that is truly getting Tea Party support.

    I love the idea of Hoekstra being called a big spending liberal. This is a guy who was rated a “Superhero” by Citizens Against Government Waste. Need to broaden your sources that you listen to in Michigan. Also check out Durant’s alleged $1.3 million and ask how much of that is General Election money that cannot be spent to defeat Hoekstra. I think you will find he has much less in the tank to take on Pete and only 3% of the vote currently.

    Trailing by 47 points, unkown, no cash. You guys have your work cut out for you. I will be rooting you on to abject failure on this one.

    • tankertodd

      Durant came to our township with two other candidates last week and he was the most impressive. I don’t know who Gary Glenn is but he didn’t show up (and neither did Hoekstra or his representative who was supposed to show as well).

      Durant impressed me with his background with charter schools. Conservatives need to be conversant in how to apply our market-based values to the education regime. He made it clear he can bring endorsements and votes from across the aisle in the general election. This will be critical in beating Stabenow. All three candidates agreed in 98% of their talking points.

      • glennforsenate

        Tanker,

        You can find out who Gary Glenn is at http://GaryGlenn.US

        Also, please identify at what event you say Gary “didn’t show up” last week.

        He spoke to the Kalkaska Tea Party, Sanilac Co. GOP, St. Clair Co. GOP, and Taylor Republican Club last week.

        We’re not aware of any other event to which he was invited and was supposed to appear last week. Please let us know so we can get him to your township ASAP.

        Thanks,

        Glenn for Senate
        info@garyglenn.us

  • http://www.neoavatara.com/blog neoavatara

    Durant is the better candidate, but hoekstra has more money, more name recognition, and a better organization.

    • miconservative

      but everything else you say is true.

  • papabear

    nt

  • racetraitor

    He does not have “no cash,” miconservative. $1.3 million raised in 4 months is not small potatoes. So what if he’s down in the polls? He’s only been in the race since September; Hoekstra’s been running for this seat since he got his tail whipped in the gubernatorial primary in 2010. His name is getting out there rapidly now, and many people are going to be surprised.

    I seem to remember an unknown fellow from somewhere in Florida–no name recognition, trailing by a zillion points, no cash–who unseated a sitting governor in the Republican primary for a FloridaSenate in 2010. I also remember an unknown fellow from Wisconsin (Republican Sean Duffy–no name recognition, trailing by a zillion points, no cash) who unseated a 15-term Democratic incumbent (Dave Obey) in the general election for Wisconsin’s 7th CD seat. It can happen if enough people get behind the true conservative and quit being pessimistic, fatalistic defeatists (I realize that’s redundant; but I’m really, really, really tired of hearing people say that “conservatives can’t win,” thereby driving down support for conservative candidates and thus ensuring the nomination of sell-out squishes. This is not aimed at you, miconservative, or at you, neoavatara.)

    • miconservative

      how much can be spent against Hoekstra?? Not $1.3 million. Lots of that is double max money from his rich Grosse Pointe friends that can’t be spent in the primary.

      And comparing Clark Durant to Marco Rubio is laughable. No offense but Marco Rubio did not grow up in the leafy Grosse Pointe suburbs as the son of an auto industry scion. He had a much different story that actually connected with people. And Pete Hoekstra is not Charlie Crist. Hoekstra opposed the stimulus, cap and trade, obamacare, etc. Pete Hoekstra is a solid conservative, in fact was the most conservative member of the Michigan congressional delegation. Ask Bush if Hoekstra was a sellout squish when he opposed No Child Left Behind as a member of the House Education Committee. Durant made his bones as a person who runs private education alternatives for kids in poor areas who were trapped in bad public schools, very noble. And he had no bigger champion in that effort than Pete Hoekstra. For Durant to now try and label Hoekstra as some sort of liberal is the hight of hypocrisy.

      I believe the GOP can defeat Stabenow, I just believe Durant has no shot at beating Hoekstra.