« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama the Tax Cutter? Think Again

After several years of offering oblique generalities about the need to lower the corporate tax, Obama is finally putting his money where his mouth is.  Last week, Congressman Dave Camp called out Timothy Geithner for not offering a corporate tax cut in the President’s FY 2013 budget.  So with much fanfare, Geithner has unveiled a proposal to cut the top corporate tax rate from 35% to 28%.

So is Obama a born-again supply side tax cutter?  Not by a long shot.

Here are the facts.

  • Let’s remember that 28% is still higher than the average rate among industrialized countries, even among European countries.  As AEI’s Alex Brill observes, Obama’s proposal would take our corporate tax rate from last place (34th) to 32nd place.
    There had been a bipartisan consensus to lower the rate to 25%, in line with the OECD average.  Moreover, when coupled with state corporate taxes, which don’t exist in most other countries, the corporate tax rate may still be over 35% in many localities.
  • Like with all Obama tax cuts, there are sundry tax increases included in the plan, totaling $250 billion.  Obama would require U.S. companies operating overseas to pay a new minimum tax rate on their foreign earnings.  Instead of following a bipartisan plan to encourage businesses to bring their profits home through a one-time repatriation holiday, he is using the boot of government to punish them.  Obama also plans to eliminate a lot of deductions for oil and gas companies, such as expensing on drilling investments and depletion of wells.  These are not loopholes; they are universal investment deductions that factor in the cost of doing business.  Those costs will be passed down to the consumer if this plan passes.


While we all want a lower flatter tax, this plan does not lower the marginal rates enough to warrant the elimination of these deductions.  Moreover, if you’re going to eliminate credits and deductions for those companies that pay millions in taxes, why not eliminate them for every business, including green energy firms that pay no taxes to begin with?  Yet, Obama plans to renew the Production Tax Credit handout for Big Wind, a credit that is unfortunately supported by some Republicans.

  • Any benefits that would be actualized as a result of the corporate tax cut would be vitiated by Obama’s triple taxation of corporate dividends.  As the WSJ points out, under Obama’s 2013 budget, the corporate dividends tax rate would rise from 15% to 44.8% next year.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • jaykali

    Altho maybe it could be a starting negotiating position but it isn’t really anything except another campaign deal. Nothing will get done this year or probably ever while he is president. He wants to be able to say ‘hey I am for lower corporate tax rates’ and so this will let him do that and no one will challenge him on it.

  • tacitus56

    I’m new to Red State, and I love the information I can get here that’s hard to find if you don’t have time to look at every newspaper and relevant posting throughout the day (for example, the link in this post to that great WSJ article).

    One thing that I keep seeing in the media is that we should pay less attention to the corporate tax rate and instead focus on the effective tax rate, which is what corporations actually pay. The CBO shows the effective tax rate has fallen to 12.1 percent–the lowest rate in 40 years.

    Here’s a link to a WSJ article that quotes the CBO findings:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204662204577199492233215330.html

    So, it seems like U.S. corporations are actually paying a much lower tax rate than most countries. Does anyone have information I could use to dispute this?

  • http://online.logcabin.org/about/ suzieQ

    And complain about republicans opposing it.

  • davidengageamerica

    Some of the reform the President proposes makes sense (like reducing the tax rate), but other components do not.

    The first problem is that the proposal calls for adding some special-interest tax breaks to the tax code (giving manufacturer? a lower tax rate) which only leads to more tax unfairness. The second problem is that by putting a minimum tax on foreign profits, the US would be moving in the opposite direction of how our international trading partners treat foreign income.

    Experts agree that these are not the types of changes Congress should make to the corporate tax code. http://bit.ly/wkIlN5

    The most sensible way to reform the corporate tax code is by rebuilding it from scratch using the Bowles-Simpson plan as a guideline. With Bowles-Simpson type reform Congress can simplify the tax code, improve fairness, and spur economic growth by increasing the competitiveness of US companies. http://bit.ly/noTDPF

  • kjb486

    Not to mention that dividends are already taxed twice, once as corporate profits and twice as individual income.