« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Republican Senators Selling Out on Obama/Boxer/Inhofe Stimulus

Folks, it’s not the amendments we should be focused on; it’s the underlying bill that we must block.

Yes, it’s another week in D.C., and that means it’s another week of work on the highway bill.  Throughout the past two weeks, there have been copious pages of ink spilled pontificating about the ramifications of the Blunt amendment and religious conscious issues.  Moreover, the Capitol Hill papers are filled with news about Republican Senators protesting Harry Reid’s “filling the amendment tree,” blocking their precious non-germane amendments from being considered on the Senate floor.  However, through it all, we are forgetting about the underlying bill; the tax and spend highway bill (S. 1813).

Remember that most Republican senators are only lodging their protests over a chance to offer amendments that will invariably fail.  They evidently have no problem with the underlying highway bill.  We observed this a few weeks ago when just 9 Republicans voted against cloture on the motion to proceed with the bill.  Now Harry Reid has filed cloture to shut off debate, setting up a cloture vote on Tuesday and a vote on final passage later this week.  Will we coax more than 9 Republicans to oppose this behemoth?

It is appalling how many Republicans are willing to support Barbara Boxer’s highway bill – a monstrous piece of legislation that makes Boehner’s defunct House bill look conservative.  The 2-year $109 billion Senate bill (S.1813) offers no reform to mass transit and continues to mandate that states use 10% of their funding for wasteful “enhancement projects.”  The Senate bill will spawn even larger deficits in the long-run.  Even for the two-year authorization period of the bill, there will be a $35 billion deficit between trust fund outlays and gas tax revenue.  Additionally, the 1522-page bill contains $7 billion in tax increases, including onerous taxes on inherited IRAs.  It also continues the wasteful union handouts under Davis-Bacon.

Both Republicans and Democrats are touting the highway bill as a jobs bill (think stimulus), but even the Washington Post is pouring cold water on this Keynesian way of thinking.  In a random act of journalism, the Post observes something that we’ve espoused for decades.  “The [transportation] bills would simply shift spending that was creating jobs elsewhere in the economy to transportation industries. That means different jobs, but not necessarily additional ones.”

If Senate Republicans fail to block cloture, they will be complicit in helping Democrats jam House Republicans, placing pressure on conservatives to pass a terrible bill.  The vote this week will separate the men from the boys.  We will be taking names.

As Senator DeMint noted last month, “in order to avert a fiscal catastrophe in the near future, we’re going to have to get a lot more serious about curtailing unnecessary federal spending. These highway bills—both Democrat and Republican—are anything but serious.”

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • Ausonius

    America’s Epitaph.

    It is depressingly wearing to read such items week after week, knowing that the end result is a near future of mediocrity followed by a slightly distant future of decay and demise.

  • vaaztx

    ?to beat my truck up on that sh!++% highway, risk my life on that bridge that may collapse, and have to run through those speed trap town to get to the next city because the interstate isn’t complete because someone prefers to mark the “no-spending” checkbox than to allow Congress to actually fulfill one of the duties spelled out in the Constitution?

    Highway bills help Americans of both parties and if the members of the House want to nail themselves to the cross on this one the GOP is going to be slaughtered in November faster than you can say, “Speaker Pelosi”.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      exactly why states need to raise their own revenue and take care of their own infrastructure. This idea of taking gas tax revenue from 50 disparate and geographically diverse state and dolling it out randomly is very inefficient. It’s obviously not working.

      • vaaztx

        ?realized that some infrastructure needs to be national.

        The Constitution gives certain powers to the Federal government, and building roads is one of them. If you don’t wish to abide by the Constitution and throw everything back to the states reflexively then we might as well divide into 50 separate countries. Frankly, I do NOT pine for a return to 1861, the Articles of Confederation, nor the mess that is the European Union.

        • Ausonius

          I believe the point is not to quibble about federalism and national projects.

          The point seems to be that this specific bill – over 1500 pages – is most probably again chock full of pork (“Bridges to nowhere”) and – again – has probably not been read either in part or its entirety by the so-called politicians sworn to represent us as competently as possble.

          I have not had time to read it either, but what are the odds that this bill focuses only on the most needed projects and is completely devoid of unneeded pork-barrel projects? :)

          • vaaztx

            *sigh*

            So we’re bitching about stuff we don’t know about. Talk about playing into the stereotype typified by Herman Cain refusing to sign any bill over three pages long.

            If there is something specifically objectionable I’m more than willing to write letters to Cornyn and Hutchinson. But complaining about a bill simply because some Democrat somewhere supports it is ridiculous.

          • Ausonius

            I used the word “probably” because – as I said – I have not read the text of the bill.

            Again, what are the odds this bill does not have at least a few bridges to nowhere?

            Go ahead and talk about playing into stereotypes: I could not vote in good conscience on anything I had not read. Many do not read even a one-third pr?cis of such bills. I experienced the way Congressmen and Senators handled these things in the 1970′s, and have been updated in more recent years. Nothing has changed, except the degree of incompetence and irresponsibility and simple stupidity (“We have to pass it so we can see what’s in it.”)

          • iluvit

            problem 1: requiring States to spend 10% of the money in a fashion dictated by the Feds. That is a political payback and union boosting schems. Money is wasted on senseless political projects, not structural “needs”.

            Problem 2: The plan spends grossly more than the trust fund and gas tax amounts. Viable projects can be supported and bad projects declined. There is not need for any federal requirement for contractors be union contractors or to pay prevailing wage. That is like asking everyone to bid and choosing the high bidder on a project instead of the lower. All qualified contractors should be able to bid on these projects.

            I will await your posted letters to the above Senators.

          • adair

            Don’t we all know by this time that a stimulus by any other name does not create jobs, and will not improve the economy (except maybe for the union guys being hired with Davis Bacon wages).

            I doubt this bill and its work product, if such ever gets done, will even improve the highways and bridges all that much.

            When it’s already in deficit even before it’s voted on, doesn’t it seem like a not-so-hot idea after all?

    • iluvit

      that are falling down or any location that you cannot get to because the roads are so unsafe? If by chance that you can actually point to such instances then pleas show me how these cannot be repaired with the funding from the gas tax and highway trust fund. The whole point of this thread is the excessive and unnecessary new spending and you want to avoid that because it happens to be spending that you happen to like. Well it it time to cut everyone’s spending likes and get off the teat an grow up. All you talk about is generic incomplete interstates and hypothetical crumbling bridges. How many people died last year from a crumbling bridge?

      As far as the politics of this it seems that you doing the right thing is much less important that the politics of it.

      By the way, I hardly ever comment here but read every day. Your abusive and foul vocabulary is quite childish and is suggestive of two final neurons synapsing on a spirochete.

  • liveforadrenaline

    Week after week the Republican leadership caves to massive spending bills.

    Pretty soon there will have to be only one goal of electing Senators and House members… whether or not they are capable of getting on Committees and rising to the leadership levels.

  • Seedyrom

    have been sent to state level issues so we lose 2012 and lose more money on over hyped poorly researched bills that most of them won’t read. Somehow we are supposed to look the other way or expect a beating.

    Think Conservative Party candidate for 2012 running as an Independent plus we need to vote right wing incumbents out. Everyone who supports this bill should be voted out of office in the house, senate we take out who we can if there is a decent challenger.

    Were still fighting GOP recklessness, they haven’t learned a thing!

  • lastgopinillinois

    All GOP members should just vote NO on ANY bill originated by democrats in the Senate, period.
    All GOP members should vote NO on any bill passed up to the House from the Senate. And I am talking about any effort to raise the debt ceiling again too.
    If we can accomplish this, at least we can keep spending at a stalemate this year.
    All those who do not wish to comply with the wishes of the people will be ousted from office in the next election. STOP spending !

  • Pingback: AP, WaPo Peddle Right-Wing Anti-Transportation Framing As ‘News’ - Campaign for America's Future | Blog