« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Mapping Out Our Next Battles

It appears that the grandfather of Obamacare is slated to become the Republican nominee for president.  There’s not much we can do in the realm of presidential politics except hope that the new page on the Etch A Sketch will be better than the old one.  At present, the most consequential thing we can do as conservatives is to follow the congressional elections in every state, and advocate, campaign, and donate to the most conservative candidates in each district.  In the plethora of open districts, that means sorting through a bunch of new candidates; in a district with a milquetoast incumbent, that means supporting the best viable challenger.

If the spiritless Republican members in Democrat and swing districts were the sum of our problems, we would be in good shape.  The appalling thing is that there are numerous red states and districts that are represented, at best, by members who vote in line with leadership, and at worst, by members who are big-government statists.  If we continue to elect big-government statists from red districts, including some of the most conservative ones in the country, then we will be consigned to permanent minority status, even within the Republican conference.  Do we really desire for our most promising result in the November elections to be a moderate president with a Congress controlled by the same leadership?  If the answer is no, we better get to work on congressional elections.  A good place to start is with the mediocre red state incumbents.

It is clear from this week’s defeat of Don Manzullo that we will have an uphill task in replacing entrenched statist Republicans.  On Tuesday night, we lost a conservative, even with the benefit of seniority.  It will be even harder when we are challenging veterans with newcomers that have little or no name ID.  Members of the media are constantly publishing polls showing how congressional approval is in the single digits, yet voters in individual districts keep returning their incumbent to office.

We need to get moving on some of these races.  Here is a list of Republicans that clearly underperform based upon the demographics of their district, and have either attracted opponents or could still get a challenger before the state’s filing deadline.  In other words, these are the districts where we can actually affect change.  Many of these challengers won’t be viable, but that is not an excuse for automatically rubber stamping every incumbent with another term in office without a second look.

Let’s start with the incumbents.  We’ll also need to deal with the open seats in the coming days.

April 24

PA-18 Tim Murphy

May 8

NC-2 Renee Ellmers

NC-3 Walter Jones

WV-2 Shelley Moore Capito

May 15

ID-2 Mike Simpson. We have this guy in Idaho?! (54% Heritage Action score; 49% Club for Growth)

Nebraska 1,2,3: The entire delegation; Jeff Fortenberry, Lee Terry, and Adrian Smith underperform the state’s ideological bent.  They all have primary challengers.

May 29

Texas – If there’s any state where we should elect principled conservative fighters it’s in Texas.  Many of the incumbents have underperformed or are being challenged by potentially superior candidates.  15 of the 23 incumbent Republicans have attracted challengers.  There’s not much time left.  Some good places to start?

TX-6: Joe Barton

TX-7: John Culberson

TX-10: Michael McCaul

TX-21: Lamar Smith

TX-22: Pete Olson

TX-31: John Carter

Remember that not all these guys are statists.  But many of them represent some of the most conservative districts in the country, yet they voted for the debt ceiling deal and most or all of the spending bills.  They also have challengers.  It would not be the worst thing in the world to reelect some of them, but why not take a close look at the challengers instead of blissfully voting for the incumbent like a bunch of drones?

June 5

NJ-5: Leonard Lance – Admittedly, this is a swing district, but pending final approval of redistricting, we might have a better option.

June 12

North Dakota – Rick Berg is vacating the House seat to run for Senate, so he won’t officially be an incumbent in that capacity.  We must not let him win the nomination.

June 26

Oklahoma- The entire delegation ranges from statist to mediocre.  If we are going to continue electing those who support anti-free-market policies in states like OK, then we should call it quits.  The filing deadline already passed, and the only one with a challenger is John Sullivan (OK-1).

August 2

Tennessee – Much of the delegation is really underperforming.  The filing deadline is April 5.

August 7

Mich-6: Fred Upton – This is a swing district, but Fred Upton as chairman of a Super A committee?

Missouri – The filing deadline ends Tuesday, March 27.

CD-8 Jo Ann Emerson represents some of the most conservative parts of the state.  She has one primary challenger so far.

In CD-6, we can do a lot better than Sam Graves.

MO-3- Blaine Luetkemeyer, who currently represents the now-obsolete 9th district, is running in the new Republican leaning 3rd district.  We can do a lot better, yet we only have a few days until the filing deadline.

August 14

WIS-6: Tom Petri: It’s a swing district, but we can do better depending on the outcome of redistricting.

Florida – Florida’s redistricting process is not complete and there are a lot of moving parts.  The filing deadline is not until June 8.

FL-4: Andrew Crenshaw

FL-7 Transportation Committee Chairman John Mica is running for reelection is this newly-drawn district.  At present, the assumption is that Sandy Adams (current CD-24) will run against him, setting up another member-on-member race.  Sandy Adams is the preferred choice.

FL-35: David Rivera. Swing district, but Rivera just doesn’t cut it.

August 17

AZ-6: Two incumbents, David Schweikert and Ben Quayle were drawn into this new district.  Schweikert is head and shoulders above Quayle.  Leadership has already donated to Quayle after kicking Schweikert off the whip team.

August 28

Alaska-At-Large: Don Young (Heritage action score 38%!)

November 6

LA-3: Charles Boustany is losing his 7th district and will run against fellow incumbent Jeff Landry in CD-3.  Landry is clearly the better choice.  Boehner already donated to Boustany.

LA-5: Rodney Alexander

This is by no means a complete list.  Unfortunately, the filing deadline has already passed in many other red states and there are no primary challengers against those mediocre Republicans (think AL, MS, KY, SD, AR).  We’ll update this list as the elections progresses.  Ultimately, it looks like our biggest conservative pickup opportunities will come from open seats.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • chrysostom15

    I am not sure it is the best use of resources for folks to spend time, money, and energy trying to defeat Republicans. Many of the folks you have listed are conservatives, with conservative records.

    • acat

      Given your diaries, I’m not convinced you’re a republican, let alone any sort of conservative.

      Mew

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      It’s not about in-fighting. It’s about every two years picking the best choices in every district. Unfortunately, we are often left without choices. But we shouldn’t merely rubber stamp every incumbent who voted for all the spending bills just because they “own” the seat. Let’s see if we can do better.

  • quill67

    strongly disagree with the view on Republicans coming up with a lite version of health care (ARGGHH) There is no doubt he/she is a conservative (although not perfect)

    Some of the posts seem to be strategy not ideology. When we decided not to fight the Nazis as much in Africa in WWII did that mean we were supporting fascist? No. Just strategy.

    Let’s not try to question each others conservativism.

    • colonelflagg

      When did we decide that? Or did Operation Torch just never happen?

      Daniel’s point is a good one. If Mutt Romney is really going to be the nominee, whether or not he defeats 0bama we absolutely must have a conservative Congress since there’s little measurable difference between the candidates.

      • acat

        …and we need to build that bonfire in Congress by getting Red States to elect Conservatives, not keep sending back legacies and has-beens.

        Mew

      • demsaresatanic

        Quill, will you kindly indulge us and explain what you are talking about with the not fighting nazis in Africa business?

      • quill67

        “By March 1941, the Allies, weakened by the withdrawal of fifty-eight thousand men dispatched to support their allies in Greece, were in headlong retreat. Some of the Allies retired towards another port, Tobruk, which the Australian Ninth Division had seized earlier. The sardonic Austalians called their hasty retreat ‘the Benghazi-Tobruk Handicap’.”

        There is also mention of this here:

        “With British troops sent north from Africa to aid Greece, Wavell was unable to stop a new German offensive in North Africa and was driven back out of Libya by General Erwin Rommel. By the end of May, both Greece and Crete had also fallen to German forces.”

        Links:

        http://books.google.com/books?id=RyTAIbDcYwkC&pg=PA61&dq=allies+retreated+out+of+Africa+WWII&hl=en&sa=X&ei=IhJsT8rHKIKItwek3pS3Bg&ved=0CGIQ6AEwBzgU#v=onepage&q&f=false

        http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/wwiiafrsicitaly.htm#

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        Are you still with CID?

  • dvdmsr

    so I don’t forget about it; I lost a lot of interest when the Republicans nominated the Etch A Sketch.

  • http://MichaelHarrington.org Michael Harrington

    Red State specifically singled out two for primarying in Oregon… why are they not on the list?

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      The filing deadline already passed and Walden has no primary opponents.

  • infiltr8tr

    Greetings, maybe I missed it, but what about NY? Gillibrand is not a shoo-in. Can we also discuss replacing the leadership come next year? I’ve read the articles here for a while and from what I’ve seen unless we have a change in leadership, all of this is a moot point.

  • whitetop

    Lamar Smith, TX-21 may be one of the more conservative republicans in congress but he needs to be retired. He has two people running against him and we need to get behind Sheriff Mack. Richard Mack is a supporter of the Constitution and is ready to help bring this country back to greatness. He won a suit against the Clinton administration regarding the 2nd Amendment. He is a strong supporter of the Oath Keepers. It is time we put Lamar out to pasture and get some new blood in Congress; someone who will work for the people who elect him rather than play the role of the elite.

    • texastaxpayer

      regarding this race. I would like a chance to become more familiar with who is involved.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      Don’t forget SOPA. That’s a very big deal.

  • colton341

    That having a super majority of Republicans in congress is like having a President and a Congress? If people did realize this I think we would give more of an effort on electing conservatives to congress, which is much easier than electing a conservative President. Maybe we here at RedState should focus more on congressional races than the race for President.

    • naraht

      Getting to a Supermajority (2/3) in the Senate to overturn Obama’s vetos is just about impossible. The Democrats have 23 seats up for election this time around, the Republicans would have to win 19 of those seats without losing any of their own.

      Functionally to completely control Washington, you either need the President, a majority in the house and 60 votes in the Senate or you need 2/3 of both houses. The first is at the outside edge of possibility, the second is well beyond the edge.

      • colton341

        It will be near impossible to do that this year, but I feel that conservatives should focus on that and it is possible to get a supermajority. With Congress’s approval rating in the single digits would it not be wise to invest more resources in the electing Conservatives into Congress? I feel the odds would be better against single digit approval ratings rather than the President’s forty to fifty percent approval rating.

        • naraht

          While Congress itself may be close to single digits individual incumbents in their own states are nowhere near that disliked. To do this, you have to start knocking out Dem Senators in Bright Blue States like Rhode Island, Maryland , New York, and Vermont.

  • furiouschads

    i’m just sayin. sure we have citiizens’ united to make funding a one-phone call dealio, but stil…