« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

An Illustration of What is Wrong With House GOP Conference

The RSC budget was defeated earlier today, but the good news is that it garnered the support of 136 Republicans, 56% of the conference.  Or did it?  Take a look at this summation from The Hill of the roll call vote and ask yourselves what we are supposed to think about the leadership within the conference:

Members rejected the RSC proposal in a 136-285 vote in which 136 Republicans supported it and 104 Republicans opposed it. That’s more support than the RSC budget received last year, when 119 Republicans favored it and 120 opposed it.

The increase was due mostly to the decision by Democrats to vote against it rather than to vote “present,” as they did last year. In 2011, most Democrats voted “present” at the last minute, causing a chaotic scene in which many Republicans were forced to oppose the proposal lest it pass over Ryan’s budget, which was preferred by leadership.House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca.) appeared to thwart the “vote present” strategy this year by holding down the GOP vote totals until after the electronic vote had closed. Once the clock had ticked down, at least ten GOP members voting against the amendment switched to “yes.”

At the very least, it shows that our efforts to educate Republican voters about their members’ voting records is working.  At the very worst, it means that we need to find more innovative ways to expose them as frauds.

P.S. FYI.. Adam Kinzinger voted no, while Manzullo voted yes – and he wasn’t one of the vote switchers.  Just sayin’

COMMENTS

  • tokm908

    ‘At least 10′?!! Is there any way to find out exactly which GOP house members left their spines at the door?

    • philhoganjr

      Amash, Barton, Duncan, Gibson, Huelskamp, Mckinley, Platts, Rehberg, Whitfield are 9. Don’t know the 10th.

      My hunch is at least 3 opposed it from the right (amash, Duncan, Huelskamp). Maybe 4.

      • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

        you are looking at those who opposed the Ryan budget, some of them from the right, as you correctly asserted. Those guys supported the RSC budget. Look at the link in the post – it’s under the Garrett amendment.

  • Christopher Estep

    Sounds to me like you’re just complaining because the budget you wanted wasn’t the most popular.

    “There’s something wrong with the GOP Conference because the most conservative budget didn’t win, even though a competing one did!”

    Call a Waahmbulance.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      There’s something wrong when Republican leadership orchestrates a stratagem in which they allow certain members to cover their rears by voting for it only after they opposed it out of fear that Democrats would saddle them with it.

      #readingcomprehension

      • Christopher Estep

        Just sayin’

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          Just sayin’

  • GregInFla

    RSC = Republican Senatorial Committee? They make budgets for the House now. Sorry, we need to spell out acronyms the first time and have a good link. You need to fix The Hill link above. Is there some background on the history of these RSC budgets and what they usually contain? Thanks, David, I really like your diaries but this one confuses me.

    • edintexas

      The Republican Study Committee (RSC) is the Conservative Republican Caucus in the House.

      • GregInFla

        in this world to keep them all straight. Is the RSC budget a good conservative one? If so, why would it fail so badly and sound like a ploy?