« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Sign Letter for Open Appropriations Process in the House

By: Daniel Horowitz (Diary)  |  April 26th, 2012 at 10:45 AM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

Every elected Republican came to Washington promising to slash spending and balance the budget.  Yet, when it comes time for the most direct way to enact those spending cuts; namely, the annual appropriations bills, most of them are missing in action.

In an ideal world, Republicans should hold the upper hand in negotiations over spending bills. They enjoy complete control over the House, while Harry Reid only has a tenuous hold on the Senate at just 53 seats.  Unfortunately, as we chronicled extensively here at Red State, House and Senate GOP leaders agreed to jettison the Ryan budget halfway through the process in favor of Harry Reid’s minibus and omnibus bills, which vitiated every worthy goal of that budget.

There were two consequences of that betrayal.  First, House Republicans were denied the opportunity to vote on all 12 appropriations bills individually.  Second, because the bills were shunted off to conference straight from the Senate, House conservatives were denied an open floor process to offer conservative amendments cutting more spending or eliminating harmful and wasteful programs.  It is these bills that offer us the opportunity to truly cut spending, at least on the discretionary side, yet that opportunity was completed surrendered to Harry Reid.  The net effect was that not a single penny of discretionary spending was cut from the previous year’s budget and not a single program was eliminated.

As we noted earlier this week, Republicans are on track for more of the same this year.  Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans already disregarded the House budget in favor of Obama’s spending levels, while statist House appropriators are signaling they wish to do the same.  In order to preempt a repeat of last year’s insanity, Tom McClintock has drafted a letter to House leadership requesting adherence to their promise of an open amendment process on all 12 bills individually:

 Dear Speaker Boehner and Leader Cantor:

We write to express our support for a fully open appropriations process in which all twelve appropriations bills are brought individually to the House floor and every member has an opportunity to offer amendments.

We agree wholeheartedly with Speaker Boehner who said, “Let’s do away with the concept of ‘comprehensive’ spending bills. Let’s break them up, to encourage scrutiny, and make spending cuts easier.” To make this possible, House Republicans promised in the Pledge to America to “advance major legislation one issue at a time” and “let any lawmaker – Democrat or Republican – offer amendments to reduce spending.”

This vision for an open, transparent spending process is not new – it is a return to the regular order which was discarded during four years of Democrat control of the House. The new Republican House majority came to Washington with a mandate from the American people to address this historic breakdown in spending controls and to stem the tide of spending and debt. We began that work by passing a responsible budget, bringing spending bills to the House floor individually and under open rules, and letting the House work its will.

There is still much to be done to keep runaway spending and debt from destroying our economy and diminishing the prosperity of future generations. We encourage you to build on last year’s progress as we work together to put America back on a path to fiscal sanity.

Sincerely,

Tom McClintock

It’s not surprising that some Republicans would rather Harry Reid control the spending bills and send them straight to conference committee, where Republicans will be blocked from filing amendments on the committee report.  They don’t want to be forced to vote on conservative amendments to cut more spending on the floor.  It’s enough that the appropriators have to deal with a few pesky conservatives who offer spending cut amendments on a committee level.  Yesterday, Congressman Jeff Flake offered an amendment to cut another $95 billion in spending, and let’s just say that the results were not pretty [via CQ]:

Fiscal 2013 Appropriations Subcommittee Allocations/Lower Discretionary Spending

Flake, R-Ariz. – Amendment that would change the fiscal 2013 discretionary budget authority allocations for 10 subcommittees in the following manner:

Rejected 4-44: R 4-25; D 0-19; I 0-0; April 25, 2012.

Vote Key

YEAS (4)

Republicans (4)
Flake (Ariz.) Graves, T. (Ga.) Lummis (Wyo.)
Yoder (Kan.)

NAYS (44)

Republicans (25)
Aderholt (Ala.) Alexander, R. (La.) Austria (Ohio)
Bonner (Ala.) Calvert (Calif.) Carter (Texas)
Cole (Okla.) Crenshaw (Fla.) Culberson (Texas)
Dent (Pa.) Diaz-Balart (Fla.) Emerson (Mo.)
Frelinghuysen (N.J.) Granger (Texas) Kingston (Ga.)
Latham (Iowa) LaTourette (Ohio) Lewis, Jerry (Calif.)
Nunnelee (Miss.) Rehberg (Mont.) Rogers, H. (Ky.)
Simpson (Idaho) Wolf (Va.) Womack (Ark.)
Young, C.W. (Fla.)
Democrats (19)
Bishop, S. (Ga.) DeLauro (Conn.) Dicks (Wash.)
Farr (Calif.) Hinchey (N.Y.) Honda (Calif.)
Jackson, J. (Ill.) Kaptur (Ohio) Lee (Calif.)
McCollum (Minn.) Moran, James (Va.) Olver (Mass.)
Pastor (Ariz.) Price, D. (N.C.) Rothman (N.J.)
Roybal-Allard (Calif.) Schiff (Calif.) Serrano (N.Y.)
Visclosky (Ind.)

NOT VOTING (2)

Let’s bring this discussion out of the committee and have a full and open debate on the House floor regarding spending cuts and the legitimate role of the federal government.

Find out if your Republican representative plans to sign this letter.  Talk is cheap in Washington.  Anyone who purports to support a balanced budget but refuses to keep control of the appropriations process within the Republican-controlled House isn’t worth a dime to us.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

Tags: , , , , , , ,

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • joanrneel

    We need to vote Mitch McConnell out. He continually votes with the Democrats and refuses to listen to Republican voters. We demand he work to not only cut spending, but STOP the spending and “give-aways”. We thought 2010 would be a turning point, that voters demand fiscal responsibility and return to a budget like the rest of America has to live with. We want our country back.

  • vitalis

    Republicans in Congress will not call the Dem’s bluff and push for spending cuts this year for one simple reason – they realize the Dem’s are not bluffing. If the House passes cuts, it will go nowhere in the Reid’s Senate, and a government shutdown/crisis will occur. Obama has nothing to run on now, but he would love to run on Republicans stopping granny’s check. The Dems want a shutdown crisis for the election, and R’s in congress know this. Therefore, descretion being the better part of valor, they will kick the can on the looming debt crisis down the road for one more year, to get them past the election. Once we have a Senate majority and the White House, we can act like adults. For now there are only two options: appease the Democrats with spending, or a govenment shutdown that WILL be blamed on the R’s.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      Excellent analysis.

      But let us, for the record, note the price of discretion – 2 years wasted because in April 2011 the GOP did a ‘deal’ that undid their 2010 promises, a deal needed to avoid a shutdown when the Dems wouldnt agree to any more than a 0.3% cut, then in August 2011 doubled down on backtracking and effectively undid their commitment to tighter spending (Ryan budget) with a whacky deal that created an unworkable scheme to promise small cuts down the road .. which are not happening…. etc.

      2 years … and $3 TRILLION in added deficits.

      A high price for ‘not getting blamed for a shutdown’.

      • vitalis

        But we’re still faced with that binary choice; cave or risk losing everything with a shutdown. In a rational world, people would toss out every Democrat Senator just for refusing to do their job – passing a budget (let alone $1T+ deficits). Instead almost half the country blames the R’s in Congress for the current situation, and I fully expect a shutdown would push that to over 50%. I don’t see a third option, and without that, any act of fiscal responsibility is just posturing.

        • arthurjake

          Force the Senate to vote on it or Obama to veto it. Then just keep on saying Granny’s check was covered in the budget that the house passed.

  • audax

    Thank goodness someone is running againt this former Conservative turned RINO.

  • audax

    kowalski

  • drfredc

    I can always tell when the GOP LOSERship is either about to do something stupid, or has done something stupid. Before it’s reported in the PRESSSSident, the RNC calls asking me for $$$.

    I politely tell them “No — not until the RNC does what it can do to reshape the GOP Senate LOSERship, starting with benching Mitch and friends”.

    • cacharlie

      - and I will consult my Republican Rep Nunes about his take on this matter. I can’t imagine any reason why he wouldn’t vote yes – but I’d sure like to know if not, why!!!!

  • Common_Cents

  • ihateliberals

    came into the House with the promise to cut spending. They were like the Great Dane dogs of congress. The Chihuahua’s of the House like John Boehner sniped and barked back at them and just like the Great Dane they ran away from their promises. They became intimidated by the GOP leadership even after being demonized by their own Party. I had such faith in the Tea Party and the conservatives but somehow I feel totally betrayed by them. For some reason many people have faith that the House wil be retained and that the Senate hs a good chance of winning the Majority. I am sorry I don’t share that enthusiasm. I thin that because of their betrayals many of the newly elected Republicans wil be ousted come November. The local constituents wil remember the lack of action and replace them hopefully with other Republicans but most likely not. I ray that I am wrong. Can you imagine the destruction that Obama could inflict with being a lame Duck President with the Senate and the House both under control of the Democrats. Just look what he did without being a Lame Duck.