« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Next in Our Dump Upton Series

“I have said at nearly every climate change hearing that for me I don’t dispute the science.  Right or wrong, the debate over the modeling and science appears to be over.”

Guess who said that?  While those comments appear similar to the sentiments expressed by the likes of Al Gore, it was actually Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton who said it during a 2009 hearing before an E&C subcommittee hearing.

Throughout the past few years, we have bemoaned the fact that so many liberals fill the ranks of the Republican Conference.  Incumbents are supposedly unpopular, and Congress as a whole has an 8% approval rating.  Yet, almost every single incumbent has breezed through the primary season thus far.  There is no better individual to start with than Fred Upton.  To that end, we will be launching a new series, “Dump Upton,” to shed light on individual votes cast by Upton throughout his 25-year liberal special interest career.

Here is our first installment.  On May 13, 2009, Upton was one of only 19 Republicans to vote with the Pelosi Democrats to create a new “green schools advisory council” within the Department of Education for the purpose of studying how to build green schools.

Fred Upton helped shut the lights off on American households; it’s time to shut the lights off on his special interest congressional career.  I’m sure he’ll find a nice job lobbying for green energy and global warming regulations. Let’s just keep him away from the committee charged with overseeing those policies.

Let’s help Jack Hoogendyk overcome the special interest money from the energy sector that is being thrown at him.

COMMENTS

  • mikefisk

    …not that it actually carries any weight, but from living in the district I’ve been hearing the Democratic challenger for that district campaign on the idea that Upton is too conservative for this district anymore.

    I’m hoping that’s not the case, as the Democrat seems to be boilerplate “useful idiot”, but I can see the attack ads against Hoogendyk writing themselves.

    • Flagstaff

      everywhere

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    too “conservative” for Massachusetts 4….

  • vnov5

    It appears that you are associating the term “liberal” with a statement by the Chairman of Energy and Commerce that the science and modeling for anthropogenic global warming is established. That is not “liberal” – it is conservative. I realize those terms have been bent into usage that is totally at odds with their meaning (thank you W), but agreeing with the position of every expert on a subject is not “liberal thinking” – it is conservative.

    Before you dismiss this post, please do a little homework. If you are actually conservative – including the quality of being a realist – then you should not be dismissive of a fact as established as athropogenic global warming.

    What we should do about it and how quickly we should be doing it, is a different question.

  • Flagstaff

    Remember last year when Rep. Marsha Blackburn tried to get a vote to rescind the ban on incandescent light bulbs? She got no help at all from other Repubs.

    Somebody or a bunch of somebodies got their palms greased on that one. And on the original one.