« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why are Republicans Supporting Dodd-Frank?

If Obamacare is the worst piece of legislation passed by Obama and the Democrats, Dodd-Frank is clearly close behind on the list.  This pernicious bill, sponsored by the instigators of the financial and housing crises, will permanently alter our financial markets for the worst just as Obamacare will kill the healthcare sector if it’s not repealed.  I’ve met many small business owners who are contemplating a different career because of the crushing burdens from the new financial regulations.

Dodd Frank created the Financial Stability Oversight Council to enshrine “too big to fail” as a permanent government policy.  This institution would vitiate the bankruptcy process and allow the federal government to take over any entity that it deems vital to the rest of the economy.  Dodd-Frank also vested the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with the power to make infinite and officious regulations that distort the derivatives market.  Nobody knows how badly the market will be distorted as a result of these regulations, but we’ll probably be debating new programs in ten years from now to fix the problems created by the CFTC.

One of the worst aspects of the Dodd-Frank regime is the creation of the unaccountable Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).  It enjoys unchecked and unparalleled regulatory powers over consumer financial products and services.  These zealous bureaucrats will limit consumer choice and create superfluous and onerous obstacles to obtaining credit.  Most egregiously, the Dodd-Frank law gave the CFPB autonomy from the annual appropriations process by housing it within the Federal Reserve.

It’s quite peculiar that there hasn’t been a wholesale effort to repeal Dodd-Frank or at least significant parts of the law.  Nonetheless, House Republicans instituted some minimum limitations in their version of the FY 2013 Financial Services Appropriations bill.  The extra funding for CFTC regulations was stripped out and the CFPB would be subjected to the annual appropriations process.  Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for their fellow Republicans across the dome.

Yesterday, the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on Financial Services passed the FY 2013 Financial Services Appropriations bill.  The bill appropriates $245 million for implementation of Dodd-Frank and beefs up the budget of the CFTC by 50%.  It obviously contains no rider to subject the CFPB to the annual appropriations process.  Additionally, like all of the appropriations bills passed so far, this one follows the spending levels set by Reid and Obama instead of those established by the House budget.  It appropriates more than $1.3 billion more than last year’s spending levels. The bill was approved by voice vote.

The full Appropriations Committee will mark up the bill on Thursday.  Please call the Republican members of the committee and tell them to stop consummating Obama’s most offensive acts into law.  Also, tell them to side with Republicans on the issue of overall spending levels in the bill, instead of doing the bidding of Harry Reid and Barack Obama.

Senator Jim DeMint has introduced an amendment to the farm bill that will repeal Dodd-Frank – lock, stock, and barrel.  The vote, assuming Harry Reid allows it to occur, will be very illuminating.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • drfredc

    This sort of stuff should be expected from the GOP LOSERship. Follow the money, not the economy. Strip all the BS regs and rules from DF and what you have is the centralization of the banking system away from small outlying red private sector supporting banks into centralized blue banks.

    DF effective sucks money and power from the burbs into the big cities and big pocket donators — Big Pocket donators is what the LOSERship is focused upon. The LOSERship barely gives a poo about promoting the general welfare of private sector businesses and families outside of the big city blues. They are more interested in their own special interest reelection and pocketbook welfare.

    • fredflintlock

      If McConnell, as the Republican leader, can’t muster genuine, rock-ribbed opposition to laws which are clearly socialist by design, he doesn’t deserve to be Majority Leader next session.

      Kick his squishy posterior out and forget the Party’s rules of succession. We need a genuine conservative at the top by Jan 2nd.

      This is the party that counsels limited government? By current measures, I’m not sure they will have a reliable base to sell it to after things get underway next January.

      • mostlygood

        DeMint would be interesting, but he’s a little junior.

        • fredflintlock

          But on this topic, it’s too soon to be picking horses. Right now the belief that the base could effect a coup is the key issue in any discussion. To make this happen, a lot of seniority would have to be overlooked. As I said, forget the rules of succession.

          Question isn’t who right now. The question is if. Can the base unite and force a substantive change in how the Party discharges its duties? Do we have the tools?

          • JSobieski

            the public has largely (although not deeply) bought into the meme that lack of regulation resulted in the 2008 housing/finance crisis.

            Senators will go wobbly on this issue until the public debate is won decisively.

          • mostlygood

            but you’re right – the senate is an exclusive club full of arcane rules. i don’t see any harm in picking horses – but i’m hoping McConnell isn’t a lost cause.

            I think he’s done a great job in ensuring that the Obama agenda is slowed without appearing openly obstructionist, but I don’t think he’s got the charisma to be Majority Leader.

          • fredflintlock

            Mitch needs to find his inner-Reid/Pelosi-child. My suspicion is that it has been dormant for so long that it is beyond reach. A little belligerence can go a long way, as Leaders and Speakers from the left have demonstrated time and again.

            Trouble is we’re not fighting ideology only. Within the ruling class conservatives are checked by the unholy alliance between liberals and careerists, lawmakers who have done very well for themselves by giving away other people’s money. They aren’t about to go quietly.

            That’s why any move to shake up the leadership has to come from a grass roots effort. Maybe the social media tools that catalyzed the despised occupy movement could be put to better use.

          • dajeeps

            Especially Democrats, but I don’t think they want their base to know.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        His problem is that he talks big, but has no will to win. No real conservative line he will stand behind.

        • thx1138v2

          …the Republican Party is chocked full of Progressives and, I’m convinced, have taken over the leadership. Progressivism isn’t a political ideology. It is a complete philosophy and limits itself not by political party.

          How do you identify a Progressive in the Republican Party? They are now calling themselves “moderates”.

          The left in America has moved so far left that the “center” or “moderate” position is between communism and socialism. Evidence: Hugo Chavez considers Fidel Castro to the RIGHT of Obama.

          That makes the traditional American liberal a right winger and a conservative a “fringe roght wing radical”.

          • Dave_A

            Not from the ‘Romney Republicans’ or from the ideological core…

            When the GOP became the ‘party of the South’ we unfortunately picked up some Jacksonian-Democrats – and those folks still hate banks to this day…

            The same people who think Romney should break up the banks, or run an anti-Wall-St campaign (and they have posted here on this site, too – not trolls mind you, but people in the GOP who sincerely think credit and banks are evil) will support financial regulation…

            The reality is that Dodd-Frank not only overregulates banks AND increases their exposure to a 2008-style credit crisis through the ‘Volkler Rule’…

            It also corrupts the Federal Reserve by making it a ‘Consumer Protection’ institution rather than keeping it an independent bank & issuer of the US dollar…

            More political appointees in the FED, performing regulatory rather than monetary duties, weaken it’s independence & move us closer to the Ron-Paul style nightmare-world where the Congress or Presidency controls the money supply…

            Dodd Frank has to go, entirely – right after (or better yet at the same time as) Obamacare.

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            I am pretty sure Romney understands Dodd-Frank is a disaster and the Volker Rule can be interpreted as “pretty much illegal for banks to loan money”. I understand folks get upset with the banks but causing a credit crunch like we have now is a suicide pact. Banks don’t loan money for small business startups or expansions of larger business or houses…small businesses don’t get started, expansions don’t get off the ground, houses don’t get built. An aside is the banks pour capital in things like commodities spiking their prices. In the 70′s,high prices with high unemployment was caused by government fixes on wages and prices along with a supply shock in oil due to actions by OPEC. Now we see excessive government regulation due to Dodd-Frank and it’s evil cousin Sarbanes-Oxley along with a supply shock in the credit markets. I am sorry to ramble on but we simply must defeat these idiots.

          • Dave_A

            Even if I disagree with you in other ares…

          • commonsenseobserver

            “As president, Mitt Romney will also seek to repeal Dodd-Frank and replace it with a streamlined regulatory framework.”

            And “Some of the concepts in Dodd-Frank have a place. Greater transparency for inter-bank relationships, enhanced capital requirements, and provisions to address new forms of complex financial transactions are all necessary elements of effective
            financial reform. But these concepts must be translated into law in a way that creates a simple, predictable, and efficient regulatory system appropriate for our dynamic economy.”

            We’ll have to see what that new framework is…

          • Dave_A

            Since he was part of it…

            To Obama, any productive enterprise (let alone one of the core pillars of our economy) is a foreign land…

            If anyone knows how to prune (ok, hack the hell out of) that tree, Romney’s it…

            Although it would piss off the ignorant sheep, I’d also like to see him make Jamie Dimon SecTreas.

          • http://madisonproject.com/ Daniel Horowitz

            nobody is claiming that banks are sacrosanct and that there were no problems in the ’90s, but the new regs will destroy jobs and dissuade new start ups from coming on the market. You simply cannot lock up credit.

  • CarolT

    I know that Scott Brown is s RINO and he really should stay away from the MA delegates and take up with Jim DeMint and real conservatives. Brown voted for it, and I was upset with it.
    The current alternative to him is worse, and I will vote for Brown but send him emails and call to ask to explain why he votes for so many of these bad bills.

    I sincerely hope that the Republicans win the Senate and send Mitch McConnell packing as leader, the leader should be Jim DeMint.

    I read earlier today that Mitch won’t even support Senator Cornyn with asking that Holder be replaced. He is not doing his job at attorney general, It’s time for Holder to go.

  • ghostship

    Because my eyesight is certainly going downhill. I’ve been having a huge problem trying to distinguish between red and blue.

    • Ausonius

      They are so afraid of being accused of shilling for big banks and “Wall Street” when in fact by supporting D-F they actually ARE shilling for certain big banks and certain Wall Street firms: the ones receiving exemptions in exchange for campaign contributions.

      The Truth about how D-F and its deleterious effects on the nation should be broadcast daily, but again, RINO’s believe Americans are too stupid to care or understand how D-F ruins the economy.

    • uselogic

      Holy crap…. it’s a SquishFest.

  • teapartypatriot4ever

    This is exactly why elections from US President to Congressional seats at the Federal level, the State level, and local levels of govts, can have, and do have serious and dire economic, political, social, and most espcially US Constitutional crisis consequences.

    Everything that Obama, Barney Franks, Chris Dodd, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, etc on down, has ever done and still are doing, has to one end, to cut off stifle, restrict, and thus destroy and collapse Individual Freedom and Liberty, Free Market Capitalism and all the businesses, banks, and the people in America, to create the all powerful Federal govt totaliotarian authority. This all about their control and their ideology of what and how it should be in America.

    Only the complete repealing of everything Obama has ever signed intio law crafted by the liberal progressive Democrats particularly by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Franks, and Chris Dodd, will ever suffice in the restoration of economic and social prosperity once again, that which president Ronald Reagan had made reality and which these liberal Democrats and liberal RINO’s have all but destoryed.

    The only people standing in their way is the Tea party folks, that’s it. The liberal progressive RINO’s just want to collude with them against the People, thus they are part of the liberal Obamacratic side, which their fight against the people goes on as hisitory shows this political constant is never ending, But one that the people, aka the Tea Party will prevail in.

  • Pingback: look

  • angryguy77

    to believe there is no hope for this country. These bastards keep selling us out. Sometimes I really wish the GOP would go the way of the Whigs

  • siobhankelly

    Look at the republicans on the committee- Murkowski, Alexander, Collins, etc. All the usual suspects. RINO club.