« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama Seeks to Nullify our Immigration Laws

The making of a constitutional crisis

King Barack Hussein Kardashian Obama thinks that he gets to invent laws where they don’t exists and disregard the ones that are already on the books.

In yet another demonstration of contempt for the rule of law and the separation of powers, the Obama administration has announced that it will no longer enforce our immigration laws (not that he’s been enforcing them until now).  The Washington Times broke the story this morning about a secret memo from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that establishes new policies advising agents to release some illegals caught crossing the border.  The new policy will encourage agents to suspend deportation proceedings and grant amnesty to those who ostensibly fit the criteria of the Dream Act – a bill that was defeated with overwhelming bipartisan support of Congress.  Hence, the administration is publicly declaring that federal agents will ensure our laws are not executed faithfully.

The AP has more details:

The policy change, described to The Associated Press by two senior administration officials, will affect as many as 800,000 immigrants who have lived in fear of deportation. It also bypasses Congress and partially achieves the goals of the so-called DREAM Act, a long-sought but never enacted plan to establish a path toward citizenship for young people who came to the United States illegally but who have attended college or served in the military.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was to announce the new policy Friday, one week before President Barack Obama plans to address the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials’ annual conference in Orlando, Fla. Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney is scheduled to speak to the group on Thursday.

Under the administration plan, illegal immigrants will be immune from deportation if they were brought to the United States before they turned 16 and are younger than 30, have been in the country for at least five continuous years, have no criminal history, graduated from a U.S. high school or earned a GED, or served in the military. They also can apply for a work permit that will be good for two years with no limits on how many times it can be renewed. The officials who described the plan spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss it in advance of the official announcement.

There’s one problem: we have a legislative body that passes laws, not a president or a king.  The Senate defeated the DREAM Act in 2009, even though Democrats had a supermajority.

What happened to the Constitution?

The real question here is that if the president is above the law, then why should any of us be compelled to adhere to laws that we regard as imprudent or unfair?  If Obama can refuse to execute his core constitutional duties, why can’t we disregard his individual insurance mandate – a law that is an anathema to the Constitution?

What if citizens would stop paying taxes, or refuse to participate in Social Security?  If the executive branch can countermand a law of Congress, why can’t the voters – those who grant Congress its authority – do the same?

This administration is setting a dangerous precedent.

Congress must reassert its constitutional authority over immigration law.  They should hold public hearings and shed some light on the darkest corners of this administrative power grab.  Moreover, they must refuse funding for any program that grants administrative amnesty.

Obama is clearly trying to preempt the humiliation that he will suffer when the Supreme Court slaps down his lawsuit against Arizona next week.

This is not the time for Republicans to reward Obama for violating the law with their own version of amnesty.  This is the time for them to stand and fight an extreme president who is beneath contempt.  Even those who subscribe to a different view on immigration must be alarmed by this president’s usurpation of power.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • General_Confusion

    The Republicans will do what they ALWAYS do, make some noise and then full on surrender.

    It doesn?t help that some of our own little (r) open border types will cheer him on.

    Mitch McConnell and John Boehner call your office your new white flags have arrived.

    • codenametimna

      So much for the rule of law. This demonstrates that Obama is willing to do anything to get reelected. Obama wants four more years even though he told the press and the American people if he wasn’t able to fix the economy in three years he would be looking at a one term proposition. But that was then and this is now. Even though the economy is still an unmitigated disaster, Obama’s ego has usurped his rationality and he’s now ruthlessly going full steam ahead to try and hang on to his job. The ONLY job he has EVER cared about obviously. And if Congress gets in the way of his prospects he simply tells them to ‘go to hell’ and does what he wants through executive fiat.

      Barack Hussein Obama is not acting like a President of the United States. He’s acting like his pal, dictator Hugo Chavez of Venezuela. And Obama is utilizing the same “Marxist” shenanigans and agenda to try and stay in power.

      If Democrats had any semblance of decency and respect for the rule of law and the office of the presidency, they would stand up in defiance and denounce Barack Obama’s attempt to invalidate the rule of law to try and get reelected. This goes beyond ideological partisanship. This man (if you can call him that) is a direct threat to safety and security of the United States and the US Constitution which America was founded upon. He should be impeached for high crimes and other treasonous actions against the United States of America. If Barack Hussein Obama is allowed to bypass the “rule of law” with his multiple attempts to bypass Congress, he is essentially subverting the US Constitution and the democratic process. And why Republicans would continue to allow him to get away with it is beyond me.

      I know the presidential election is less than five months away and the prospects of Obama getting his butt whooped in November grows stronger each and every day. But if Obama keeps usurping the “rule of law” in his quest to get reelected, what might he do ‘next’ in his attempt to “stack the deck” in his favor to insure his reelection? In other words, since Obama has shown disdain for the “rule of law”, what prevents him from using other underhanded methods to “rig” the election in his favor? His Attorney General Eric Holder is already suing states that try to implement ‘voter id’ laws, obviously in a dastardly attempt to allow a continuation of voter fraud by Democrats.

      What’s next? Legalizing marijuana to ensure the youth vote? I’m telling you, Barack Hussein Obama is an anti-American partisan hack (who came on the scene out of nowhere) and whose real goal in life is to implement his Socialist/Marxist agenda, in order to establish a Utopian – One World Government – transforming America “from the ground up” (as he said he would do on the campaign trail in 2008) into an extension of the forthcoming United States of Europe. In other words, if Obama ultimately gets his way, the United States of America that we have known for 236 years with the freedoms and liberties currently guaranteed to us under the Constitution – will continue in decline (like its doing right now under Obama) and America will instead turn into a shadow of its former glory and self and anarchy and chaos will likely ensue, because Socialism/Marxism NEVER works and the effects of its implementation and aftermath will no doubt turn America into Greece II. With the riots and chaos that accompany it. Just like the Obama administration’s fully supported Occupy America movement has left in its wake, over the course of its infamous and hell-bent destructive rampage.

      “We The People” MUST unite in our efforts and determination to defeat Barack Hussein Obama. If you want America to survive intact and remain free that is. If you don’t… vote for O’Bummer. At your own peril I might add.

    • jaykitsap

      Near Guam in the South Pacific the US territories Islands of Rota and Saipan was under their own NMCI immigration enforcement. For a decade it also had special status of reduced tariffs for items made there (inside the US) so 14 factories sprang up on this pretty small island, including Nike. The workers came in from across asia to work at the plants. As China and other places got their tariffs reduced and the lefties in Congress pushed Saipan to follow US minimum wages, OSHA, etc the factories closed down.

      This left literally thousands of hard working women literally stranded on Saipan. About 2 years ago INS took over immigration enforcement and these women, who came into the US legally and many have been here over a decade, are now facing deportation.

      It seems so typical that we give amnesty to illegals here but will deny these Saipan women that arrived legally to remain. It was the US companies that left them stranded.

  • carolina

    At least it is not a path to citizenship.
    Anything done by this administration can be just as easily undone by the next administration.
    More workers without more jobs = higher unemployment rate. BO is an idiot.

    • http://madisonproject.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      Rubio is a legislator and can do whatever he wants. We might disagree with it, but a member can propose changes to immigration laws. The president, on the other hand, has no authority to alter laws without Congress first passing a new one.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        The executive branch has the power to enforce the laws Congress makes. Obama will claim this is an enforcement strategy. That is why the Presidency is important (as streiff so adroitly spells out below).

        • dilligas

          the exectutive branch has the DUTY and is required to enforce federal law….

    • wbedding

      don’t fall for the trap! yes, it is not an immediate path to citizenship. this is not about granting full amnesty so they can become citizens immediately. this is a ploy by the white house to gain votes (both legal AND illegal) for the 2012 election. they are useful idiots to Obama. he just wants them to keep him in office!

      what will happen is an ACORN style voting registration arm will come in, register them before they go to the polls and give them a vote in the november elections. most polling places where there is no voter ID law and opportunities to register on site will fall victim to this outrageous ploy by Obama to hijack the election.

      Democrats are as Democrats do…

      • spolson

        to empathize with illegal immigrants, they are taking the same path to citizenship he did.

    • littlehouse18

      ..

    • UpLateAgain

      between a ‘proposed’ plan and a ‘dictated’ one. Similarities and dissimilarities in the plan aside, Rubio isn’t forcing it down your throat, and Rubio isn’t taking another step to make Congress irrelevant.

      I don’t know about you, but my throat’s getting a little sore from Obama forcing things down it.

    • rightlane1111

      Rubio wants them to get a visa/green card/whatever and register. He wants them in this country for a given period of time and then they must return to their country and apply for citizenship along with the rest of the people trying to get into this country…and I might add…at the back of the line.

      So…they have a path to citizenship…with no preference…they are the same as other people. What this does do is allow the government to know who they are and who they work for, i.e., revenues into the government for example.

      As far as higher unemployment…you must know by now that Obama…because they are Illegal (which he will NEVER call them) WILL NEVER COUNT THEM. The same math as inflation…we don’t count food or energy.

      We’re losing jobs because of his boot on the necks of small business and regulations on the bigger companies. They are leaving…can anyone say…Apple for instance or GE

      So my question…Do you want a guest worker program in the USA where Hispanics are paying into the system or companies leaving the USA thanks to Obama’s tax policies and Chinese workers getting our jobs…and they don’t pay us squat.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      Some day, down the road, citizenship.

      There are multiple outrages here:
      1. Selective enforcement makes a mockery of our laws – it violated the EQUAL PROTECTION rights that we have. What if Obama announced that kids from one country would be deported but people from another not?
      2. Rubio’s plan, like the DREAM Act, was and is flawed. They talk of ‘kids’ but the fine prints says anyone who gets here by age 16. They always sell the hard-luck cases, but hard cases make for bad laws. So even if it was doing something along the DREAM Act lines, its the wrong thing – a wrong thing rejected by Congress.
      3. But the real problem is that even if the plan might be ‘okay’ – the Constitution tells the Congress not the President to make laws. By jumping the gun, Obama is going beyond his legitimate executive branch powers, and will make compromise HARDER not easier, and Rubio’s statement said as much. Worse yet, this selective enforcement means they will continue to actually be illegal aliens, so this is guaranteed to keep the open sore of illegal immigration festering, while making a real long-term solution more remote.
      4. The administration, at DOJ, NLRB, EPA, etc., has been politicizing and selectively enforcing laws in many areas. This trend is very disturbing. We have an uncompromising, dictatorial president who undermines our rule of law.

  • norris

    Will they get a voter registration card with the work permit

    • UpLateAgain

      They’ll have to keep registering and voting illegally for a bit.

      Of course, since Holder has filed suit in Florida (other swing states next you think?) to keep the state from removing illegals AND dead people from their voter rolls…… that voting illegally thing isn’t really a problem for them, so it might be the way things remain for a while.

  • cheetah2

    By any means, fair or foul.

    • rightlane1111

      the first order of business would have been boots on the ground…PERIOD.

  • commonsenseobserver

    By doing this, Obama is only making it more difficult for a cross-party consensus to be established that strengthens the border while streamlining our immigration system. Obama’s actions undermine our security and expose his disrespect for our constitutional system of checks-and-balances.

    • Flagstaff

      Not in optimal order.

      1. It’s an unconstitutional power grab by the administration. The Executive can’t unilaterally decide to grant immunity from prosecution to a class of lawbreakers. The Won says it isn’t amnesty or immunity, but it is.

      2. During tough times for workers, it keeps foreign competition more active within our job markets.

      3. Congress voted down a similar proposal in 2010. It’s their job, not his.

      4. It creates a new magnet to attract more illegal immigration, countering the drop off that’s occurred as a result of the bad economy.

      5. Instead of discouraging more illegal immigration, it encourages it.

      6. By encouraging illegal immigration, it makes it more difficult to reform legal immigration procedures.

      7. It treats different people unequally under the law–giving those NOT favored an appeal to their own deportation order.

      8. It’s a ham-handed attempt to solve a problem that requires a nuanced approach.

      10. It’s a major change to policy aimed at a very minor aspect of a much bigger problem. They never have been targeting these young people.

      11. It’s a political pander. Very little has actually changed.

      12. Obama admitted in advance that he can’t do it legally.

      13. Romney’s position is a good one–restate it frequently.

      • romeg

        whether Romney or the House of Representatives take up this action by the President on the basis of Constitutionality or anything else. Anything our side does or says in criticism of his edict will be treated by the Democrats and their publicity agents (the MSLM) as part of “The Republican War on Immigrants” with particular emphasis on Latino immigrants. There will be Spanish language ads running in every market in the U.S. within hours decrying the racist mindset of the Republicans. We have to devise a way to correct the problem without giving them the ammunition with which to attack us.

        The Republicans in the current Congress are in something of a no-win situation: Even if the Democrats actively support a measure introduced by our guys it will never come up for a vote in Harry Reid’s Senate. And even if it were, by some miracle, to actually PASS the Senate, Barry stands ready to veto it on some made up BS grounds or to scheme with Dingy Harry to postpone the vote until just prior to a recess whereupon the His Royal Majesty, King Barry the First will simply let it die by not signing it.

        The Republicans should make NO mention of the nature or intent of HRM Barry’s act. They should introduce legislation that accomplishes the just and fair objectives of an immigration policy that includes, just for starters, citizenship for any immigrant that serves in and is honorably discharged from any branch of the U.S. military.

        It should also include a path to citizenship for immigrants who were brought into the country as a minor child under the age of 15 AND who has been in the country CONTINUOUSLY for at least 5 years since arrival AND who has NOT yet attained the age of 25, has NEVER been arrested, let alone convicted for so much as a misdemeanor AND who has completed high school or who is currently enrolled in college and is maintaining at least a 3.0 GPA.

        These criteria, after all, are those that we desire of all residents of this country whether immigrant or natural born citizens.

        As Erick pointed out earlier this week, if we aren’t about justice and individual rights then why are we even bothering with any of this. If we are a nation of laws then those laws should be just and then judiciously enforced. Otherwise we get the kind of high-handedness that we see from King Barry.

        As I stated above, even if it gets passed in the House, it will never see the light of day in the Senate. It will be treated exactly as the Ryan Budget Proposal; regardless of the rightness or wrongness of it, the Dems will attempt to spin it The Chicago Way. But by clearly and concisely declaring exactly what our positions are in this matter, we will have the record as our defense against their scurrilous charges.

        • Flagstaff

          I really like it. In a reasonable world, your solution would be one to be considered, but we don’t live in a reasonable world anymore.

          One part of the problem you didn’t cover is that without control of the border, it doesn’t serve any good purpose to discuss what we should do with the illegals that are already here. Reasonable solutions simply become another magnet that attract more illegal border crossings. In itself, this presents a good reason for us to decline to even discuss those “after control” measures.

          For the same reason, to introduce any legislation on the subject is counter-productive. Furthermore, the fact is that there isn’t any consensus among Republicans or any conservatives that your preferred law is even a good one, let alone the best. To go down that path would mean keeping the issue open until the election, and we agree that it isn’t an issue that we want to keep open, at least not in this manner.

          [Republicans] should introduce legislation that accomplishes the just and fair objectives of an immigration policy that includes, just for starters, citizenship for any immigrant that serves in and is honorably discharged from any branch of the U.S. military.

          It should also include a path to citizenship for immigrants who were brought into the country as a minor child under the age of 15 AND who has been in the country CONTINUOUSLY for at least 5 years since arrival AND who has NOT yet attained the age of 25, has NEVER been arrested, let alone convicted for so much as a misdemeanor AND who has completed high school or who is currently enrolled in college and is maintaining at least a 3.0 GPA.

          It’s certainly a good start, and well worth discussing, but not until after the border is secure. If such legislation is introduced before that time, we will find the tea party support eroding for anybody that votes for it, because we are simple people. Any attempt to introduce or pass such legislation (by anybody except Marco Rubio or another Hispanic Congressman) would be correctly seen as simple pandering to an ethnic group in an attempt to be re-elected, not as a real attempt to solve the problem.

          My list, BTW, was just what might be said if the question came up in conversation, not a suggestion that we should enter into debates with Dem’s on the topic. So far, I think Romney has handled it almost perfectly. If it isn’t kept alive by a controversy, the Obamatons will lose interest and “move on” to their next big idea.

    • http://UnitedConservativesofVirginia Cargosquid

      If Romney is smart, he will take the videos of this and paste them into an ad pointing out that the Black unemployment rate is hovering, according to gov?t statistics, around 12-13%. And now, Obama is GIVING illegal aliens?work visas.

  • streiff

    1. The presidency always matters. By controlling the agencies that make and administer policy the President can do a lot of stuff even in Congress doesn’t like it. For those who say that Romney is no different than Obama i suggest you pull your head out of your watch pocket and pay attention.

    2. The “serve in the military” part is simply eyewash so that if anyone disagrees with this they can say “but what about the kid who served in Iraq/Afghanistan.” You have to have proof of citizenship/resident alien status to enlist. If you are illegal and enlisted you committed a felony.

    • tnfriendofcoal101368

      nt

    • cbartlett

      My first reaction to this was – how does someone without a birth certificate and/or social security number get into college or the military in the first place? I’m fairly sure the college applications I filled out 35 years ago, and the ones I helped my kids with 10 years ago, REQUIRED a SSN. I think we also had to give permission for background checks to make sure there was no criminal record – wouldn’t that red-flag a non-citizen?

      Agree with streiff – surely we require citizenship for military enlistment! Why on earth would we allow non-citizens to serve in our military? Doesn’t that sound like an excellent plan to get terrorists in our midsts?

      • streiff

        resident aliens can enlist.

        Only citizens can be commissioned officers or warrant officers.

        • PowerToThePeople

          do we not still grant citizenship to anyone serving a full term in the military who was discharged honorably? Am I also correct that once that citizenship has be given, they are then eligible for officer training and placement?

          • streiff

            military service gets you “expedited” citizenship http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=26d805a25c4c4210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=ce613e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD

            Once you are a citizen, you are eligible to be commissioned. We don’t do the whole “natural born” thing in the military so we don’t have to worry about birfers.

          • PowerToThePeople

            answered my questions as did you.

    • romeg

      in order to serve in the U.S. military. That has never been a requirement.

  • UpLateAgain

    Democrats… beware. You allow this kind of garbage to go unchallenged when your guy is in office, as if your guy is always going to be in office. He won’t be, and once you open this door, it is you who will be on the receiving end of the ‘president has unlimited powers’ stick at some point down the road. You always forget the worm is guaranteed to turn sooner or later.

    If you allow this affront to separation of powers and containment of executive ability to dictate law to go unchallenged, you do so now at your genuine future PERSONAL peril.

    • General_Confusion

      As soon as the administration changes there will be a reset and a return to constitutional* legislative law writing. Don?t think for a moment ?But you guys did it? will matter one wit to the Dems or the press.

      * Their version of ?constitutional? not our founding fathers version.

      • UpLateAgain

        I think a little hardball is in order. Of course, that would require Republicans to be “right wing radical Tea Party supporter types” instead of moderates, RINOS, etc……. But we couldn’t do that. It would ruin the Republican Party! Or so I’m continuously told.

        • General_Confusion

          He knows there will be not be any Congressional push back**.

          And yes, it is time for pushback, it does work (See Scott Walker for details) but sadly with our current leadership it will be all bipartisan smiles and high fiving and absolutely no action.

          * Not correct in right thinking but in that he knows the Republicans will do absolutely nothing and this will cause more descent within our party. http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/06/14/rubio%e2%80%99s-nightmare-act-folly/

          ** While the Republicans in Congress will do absolutely nothing the voters may not. He is calculating he will get more votes with illegals then he will lose otherwise. In this aspect I hope he is wrong.

    • Common_Cents

      to stand up to this, or to do the same once they are in power.

      A longer term strategic plan needs to be neutralizing the DEM propaganda media. But we have no plan to do it. If we don’t we’ll always be playing catch up.

      This gamesmanship is getting disgusting. How about we uphold the constitution and current laws, instead of anything goes games for re-election. Things are heading downhill fast.

  • UpLateAgain

    How about “anchor workers”? I’m guessing this will end up allowing all kinds of people other than those described in the law to remain in this country.

    And how many of those will end up voting (illegally now.. eventually legally)? Apparently the president can just dictate police and law, so why not just eventually declare since they are in this country they can vote. We shouldn’t need those irrelevant Congress guys troubling themselves in all this.

    In fact, why not just dissolve Congress altogether and save the money? We could better use it to reward cronies who successfully bundle campaign funds for the presidents reelection!

  • talgus

    exactly what he did not like about the Constitution. No time spent learning what is required, just those things he wants that are not allowed/required/stated. What worries me are all those sycophants that made extreme noise about things in Bush’s presidency but are totally silent as the baby is tossed by Obama changing the bath water.
    Politics before community, we are gong down.

  • DerKrieger

    …Mark Pryor (D-AR), and gave them my opinion. The aide was quite hostile so I can only assume that the calls they are receiving about this aren’t positive.

    • UpLateAgain

      The DC offices. The respondents were quite somber, and didn’t seem to take it as a crank suggestion that Congress just vote to disband, since they were obviously irrelevant anymore and were just costing us money. I pointed out that Obama would likely be willing to give them full pensions if they did (you know.. by executive order… since that seems to trump everything these days).

  • GopTiger

    This clumsy attempt to rally the “base” (both the legal and illegal base) was surely moved from the original early October announcement to June in order to change the emerging narrative that Obama is Bush I and this is 1992 all over again.

    There is only one problem with this calculation by Team Obama: the undecideds voters are overwhelmingly white, middle and working class.

    How is this blatantly obvious de facto amnesty attempt going to play with these voters in Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Virginia, and Pennsylvania?

    • Common_Cents

      Does baraka think they’ll put up with it, or has he already lost that demo in those states?

      • red_oakster

        While it may upset some undecideds, will it be their top issue? Probably not. In contrast, it is hugely important for many (though not all) Hispanic voters.

        My guess is that Romney will be very cautious in his response and that Rubio’s veep prospects just improved a tad.

        • GopTiger

          I agree with you-immigration is probably not the top issue among undecideds. But today’s announcement potentially risks alienating them.

          What are the top issues for blue-collar and middle-of-the-middle class whites ? Jobs, debt, and economic growth.

          Does today’s annoucement reassure them Obama is concerned about their issues? Nope.

          Barack Obama effectively just told Billy and Betty Bluecollar that while he has all sorts of goodies (gay marriage, amnesty for illegals, free birth control for the feminist crowd) for his liberal base, he has nothing for them.

          Electorally, this is net loser for Obama. Whatever he may have gained in Nevada and Colorado, he more than lost in Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

          The fact today’s announcement was also laced with flop sweat won’t change the emerging media narrative either.

        • gracepmc

          for me. I found your comment interesting. I live in Fl. and have been a Rubio supporter from day 1. But today I called Romney’s Office and Rubio’s Office and told them I could not support a Romney/Rubio ticket. This is a change for me. It is based upon Rubio’s response to Obama’s move. Rubio was quick out of the gate. He agreed in spirit, but only gave the very weakest of nods to the fact that this was an end run around the power of Congress to legislate immigration. We need to deal with immigration but we need to do so within the law. However long that takes. Obama attempted to deal with the problem of illegals by acting illegally for political personal gain as we all know. Two too many illegals for me.

          • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

            I 100% completely agree that Rubio VP prospects are now DIMINISHED and he should NOT be the VP.
            He is a bit ‘green’ as a Senator in any case, but Obama’s announcement makes Rubio too much of a contradiction to Romney, raising a side-issue and highlighting a non-difference when the opposite should be in play.

            In fact, it might be that Obama did this move in part to rebut / blunt Rubio as VP. Putting Rubio there now would then highlight this issue in a way that would not work for Romney campaign.

            Romney needs to clearly yet carefully oppose the Obama usurpation of power, oppose amnesty and the DREAM Act, and support a real compromise that incorporates enforcement. Rubio’s substantive position on this is too close to what Obama has done.

            go with Gov Jindhal or Gov ODonnell (we need Virginia, we need catholic votes, and we need to show a solid smart ticket – they’d work.).

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      I for one thing Obama’s announcement is dreadfully bad policy – both on the substance and the unconstitutional overreach of executive powers – and bad politics.

      But I heard Linda Chavez on NPR (the ‘conservative’ paired with lib koolaid drinker EJ Dionne for socalled ‘balance’) who basically *agreed* with the policy “open borders! yeah!” and then warned GOP leaders not to make the ‘mistake’ of opposing this… but then the same nonsense from Neil Boortz (another open borders fan I suppose).

      At least Mickey Kaus and Sen Graham are being snarky.

      “How is this blatantly obvious de facto amnesty attempt going to play with these voters in Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Virginia, and Pennsylvania?”

      Answer: IT WON’T!

      Once again, Obama has lurched to the LEFT – for gay marriage, forcing churches on abortion/values, for amnesty, for more taxes and more spending. This guy is progressive left-liberalism on crack.

      Obama did this so yet another constituency in his base wouldnt be left empty-handed. 4 years of promising amnesty and he did nothing substantive (and he cant blame Republicans, they didnt do anything in 2009 when they could).

      So the open-borders GOP elites who want to praise Obama are IMHO nuts – as usual they fumble the ball.

  • ATGinCT

    under this administration, the democrats would never sit idle like the republicans have.

    As a side note, is it only me or does Obama remind anyone of Joffrey from Game of Thrones?

    • Common_Cents

      when baraka continually blames congress, steps on their toes, and ignores them?

      • ATGinCT

        they speak in roughly the same terms, ideology not law seems the driver there and hypocrisy to them is a foreign concept defined by ideology not a dictionary.

        “Dissent is patriotic”, teaparty are traitors, it’s easy to follow the “logic” there, up is down, left is right and all that.

    • UpLateAgain

      he’s only killing people willy-nilly on foreign soil.

      Of course…. we know the Obama’s discretion kill list exists (he ‘s been bragging about it after all), but we don’t know who’s on it……. so after November…..

      Hmmmm. I wonder if there might be a market for providing the government with broadswords and/or guillotines?

  • septembergurl

    both crucial to his re-election:

    Swing state voters, overwhelmingly white, older, very much opposed to amnesty for illegals (which is what this is). The O team is obviously abandoning the Midwest strategery and going for the Western route, abandoning any hope in Ohio, Michigan, wisconsin, etc. He already lost the southern route with the gay marriage pander.

    Equally important, how long can he go on dissing the black voter base? The highest unemployment sector is young black men who have dropped out of high school and/or possess no marketable skills. Now you flood the sector with marginally more employable hispanic youths, who will compete for the few jobs there are.

    Of course blacks have been told that immigration laws are discrimination and they have to support Hispanics getting amnesty, never mind that African-As will suffer financially and other ways (access to education, etc).

    And then there are benefits. Who here thinks that these youts are going to be immediately hired in this economy? A work permit is not a job. Are these going to be pretend jobs, make-work jobs? Are there going to be immediate benefits such as food stamps, etc? What about health care?

    Meanwhile fortuitously Mitt romney is well positioned on this issue. during the primaries he adopted a very strong anti-amnesty stance, to take rick Perry out, perry being vulnerable on the issue. I don’t think he has to do much except point out the questionable legality of this move.

    • UpLateAgain

      when Obama made the decision to go ahead. He’s probably figuring he’s lost about all the black votes he’s going-to already. Down from 95% to 88% (if the polls are accurate), he’s probably betting it won’t be more than a couple more percent at most..

      I’m only surprised he didn’t wait until late afternoon to make the announcement. That’s what he usually does with something like this. Then a lot of it goes unnoticed over the weekend.

      • Common_Cents

        notice the rock star dictator in chief showed up a full 55 minutes late.

        has he EVER been on time to anything?

        He was obviously angry at the briefing, blaming congress LOL.

        I say they know they are in great trouble and are desperate and backed into a corner. Watch him do more radical things.

        • acat

          Going to go on record here as saying Rubio making noises on this issue in the Senate have led to this remarkably foolish position on Obama’s part, and has played into Romney’s hand.

          Mew

          p.s. this is not an endorsement of Rubio for veep, I do not think he’s the best possible candidate although he would be an acceptable one … this is an acknowledgement that Rubio has managed to prove Obama is blown by the winds…

        • stumpy

          n/t

  • sarg01

    The Obama campaign is going for a all-out lefty win. Their only sop to the middle will be to riff on Romney’s wealth.

    In union heavy states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, they’ll focus on turnout to hold on by the skin of their teeth, while using the Richie Rich caricature to keep Romney beatable.

    In Virginia, they’ll turnout the non-defense government employee DC suburbs … and let Tim Kaine handle the messaging. The government employees will vote for Obama no matter what the message is. The rest of the Virginia electorate is more likely to respond to Kaine-over-Allen than Obama-over-Romney.

    If they hold those four states and don’t lose Oregon … they win with Arizona. Even if it costs them Ohio, Iowa and Colorado. Even without Florida, though they probably hope this move will help them contest Florida in case Virginia, Michigan or Wisconsin turns sour for them.

    • acat
      • sarg01

        This move is about trying to create one while keeping Florida in play – his Jewish support is collapsing.

        The thing you have to remember with the Obama campaign is that most of them just aren’t very good, and they don’t know it. Axelrod, Plouffe and Obama himself all have massively over-inflated opinions of their abilities. Messina is the only one in the crowd that’s worrisome – but he’s all about tactics. Turnout operations, renting vans, leveraging union “creativity” at turnout and intimidation in heavy leftist population centers.

        There’s no doubt in my mind that they buy the spin that they’re up 7 points in Wisconsin based on the “exit polls”. PA has been inexplicably polling huge Obama margins, so they’re not worried there, either. So to them it comes down to holding Virginia, Michigan and then picking up 10 electoral votes anywhere else. Arizona does it in one fell swoop, but Nevada + NH does too. Florida would absolutely swamp it.

        Of course, the good news is I don’t really think they can hold Michigan or Virginia without vote fraud. Or take Arizona for that matter. But Florida’s still worrisome.

        • http://conservatisthandbook.blogspot.com cjd87

          I’m just glad that one memo written by some political appointee can completely change the enforcement of the immigration policy of an entire country.

        • tnfriendofcoal101368

          Romney is going to carry Florida comparatively easily. When talking about the Hispanic vote (acat has pointed this out several times), folks often only consider the Mexican-American Hispanic issues. This leads to some bad analysis especially in Florida. The largest percentages of Hispanics in Florida are Cuban-American and Puerto Rican descent Hispanics. The immigration argument just doesn’t play the same in Florida. These communities are by tradition, Republican and they vote that way. Obama’s actions today aren’t going to have a great affect moving the needle in that community. Florida is also one of the hardest hit states in the current Obama recession. The perfect storm as you state, the large Jewish population is ambivalent on Obama. Israel is important in this community and large numbers here have helped Democrats close the gap to Republican advantages in the panhandle. Florida is going to come in for Romney and we won’t be until 2:30 AM waiting on the final numbers. Virginia different story (it is the only Southern swing state this cycle)…it comes down to who turns out the vote…the Populous DC suburbs in Northern Virginia; the Republican lean Virginia Beach/Norfolk military vote or the huge Republican advantage in Southwestern Virginia from Roanoake south. I will say there is no where in the country whjere Obama is more disliked then in Va/WVa coal country, not even in the deepest of the deep South (as Rick Boucher found out when he was “retired”).

          • sarg01

            They may not be the biggest demographic in themselves, since they can only vote with union/ACORN “assistance”, but they do have families and social circles.

            Historically, those people have been unlikely voters. Obama’s playing a turnout game. He’s trying to break history by getting them to the polls – it’s a lot cheaper to rent vans and supply some beer in Miami/Tallahasee on Election Day than it is to run state-wide advertising in a state with 6+ media markets. It’s also more likely to turn out only Obama voters.

            He’s writing off Ohio because he doesn’t think he can win it cheap enough. Remember, in his mind, he’s the fourth best president ever – it’s just this damn economy (which is everyone’s fault but his) and those Republican slush funds that cause him problems. So he’s looking for voters who will pull the lever for him regardless of the economy or advertising. That limits him to liberals, racial voters and government employees today. He’s trying to add friends of illegal immigrants to that list, and he’s less worried about the white working class because he’s not confident he can WIN the white working class.

          • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

            It’s all a part of the plan.

            Voter ID and policing the voter rolls so non-citizens cant vote actually ruins their leverage from this policy.

  • Kyle-MI

    Even if it means shredding the Constitution.

  • standfast24

    Can’t be surprised, this has been coming for along time. This is the last salvo that Obama can fire. The last thing he can juice is Latino turnout, no doubt focused on the swing states.
    They need time to register as many new voters as possible, why worry about citizenship ?
    Really wonder what this will do to turnout for both sides. But not good that a President chooses to so blatantly ignore the Constitution, Congress and our rule of law.

    • civil truth

      Obama’s game plan has been to keep the lid on foreign disturbances, including the Middle East, until after the election.

      However, should his reelection chances get grim. there’s still the “rally around the troops” stratagem: he may decide to intervene in Syria (more likely) or give the go ahead to go after Iran (less likely) – though Russia’s expanding into the power vacuum may raise the risk/cost too high in the Middle East. But there are other theaters to enter.

      And then there are the tin foil domestic scenarios.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        I am looking at a strike at Iran’s nuke plants just before the election. or else he will pull some other type of October surprise like offering to cancel all student loan debt.

        Something big like that.

  • http://www.skiloveland.com skicougar

    It doesn’t exist under Obama.

    It still exists under republican presidents because the media holds them accountable. Hope we make it to a republican president, or you may not be able to ask things like, “What happened to the Constitution?” in public.

  • westcoastpatriette

    here is a great resource to help you follow through.

    http://capwiz.com/fair/callalert/index.tt?alertid=61471071

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    illegal immigrants are now called “Dreamers,” at least they are in the story here.

  • lineholder

    Or could it bypass voter ID laws that have already been set up in some states? If they have work visas, can they also get a ID to vote?

    This is the left we’re talking about. They go after special interest groups for the purpose of binding those special interests to the Democrat Party with a sense of loyalty. Then they present themselves as having the ONLY solution to problems our nation is facing that will meet the needs of those special interest groups.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      there will be busloads of illegals being shipped in to the polls, you can bet on that.

      No, none of it will be legal, but that is of no consequence to the left.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    Twitchy report <a href="http://twitchy.com/2012/06/15/daily-callers-neil-munro-interrupts-president-obama-is-this-right-thing-to-do-for-american-workers/?utm_source=autotweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter.

    Statements from DC and the reporter here.

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      Twitchy here.

      • gekster

  • infiltr8tr

    You know, a lot of people I know who are very interested in the Tea Party have asked the following question of me at some point; “We know why the other two parties won’t discuss illegal immigration, why won’t the Tea Party mention it, let alone put it in their platform?”
    I cannot understand this either as a number of people I know who encompass the political spectrum have absolutely had it with Washington’s refusal to do anything about this and then have the absolute gall to go after anybody who does.
    I work with a woman who’s father came here legally from Mexico in the late 60′s and patiently did everything he was asked to on the road to becoming a citizen (Which she said took seven years). According to her he screams at the television whenever one of these “Undocumented workers” goes before the camera to decry people like Jan Brewer & Joe Arpaio for doing the job the feds won’t because it’s “Unfair” & “dehumanizing” I guess that’s the latest buzz word they use now.
    She told me he said that when he came here, he wanted to be part of this country and that he still beams when telling others of the day he raised his hand and took the oath. “Now,” he said, “They give citizenship away like it’s worthless, just another chip to be tossed on to the pile in a political poker game.”
    She said, “You follow politics, we like the Tea Party because their fiscal agenda makes sense. Why can’t they make controlling illegal immigration part of that?” Ok, why can’t we?

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      that represents every local tea party. I can tell you that the local tea party here in Birmingham fought hard to get our illegal immigration bill passed, and then again recently to stop the legislature from stripping the guts out of it. One of our more active members is a legal immigrant.

    • acat

      The Tea Parties are deliberately leaderless.

      The Tea Parties are deliberately local.

      The Tea Parties were initially deliberately not taking positions on anything but economics. This has, in some groups, changed .. in my opinion to their detriment.

      It’s supposed to be leaderless – self-organized networks building and re-building from the ground up, so that the issues and ideas, not the personalities, drive it.

      If you want a national anti-illegals group, I’d suggest looking up Tom Tancredo .. he seems to have a few followers.

      Mew

  • WylieJon

    The natural extension of this is allowing the illegal parents of these kids to stay and giving them work permits as well.

    Can’t have the poor children, who did nothing wrong, be punished by deporting their law-breaking parents…

    And why are we supposed to believe that this is not another backdoor amnesty plan? This is going to take anchor baby to a whole new level!

    • gekster

      nt

    • acat

      so we can deport their parents.

      (Cheshire grin)

      • WylieJon

        I’m not really up for raising these kids any more than I already have (with my tax dollars).

        Besides, we’ve been told for years that we can’t separate families. So when the parents are deported, we must do the kind, decent, and responsible thing: send the kids with the them.

        I’m sick and tired of the arguments about splitting up a family. I would never suggest or condone that. I do, however, believe that we take the wrong approach. Don’t keep them together here…send them home together!

  • politics101

    For those of us to whom the issue of illegal immigration is a matter of law, the president’s actions today should be answered with three reactions: Moving to sue DHS to keep them from implementing Obama’s executive order, passing immediate legislation in the House keeping our current laws intact and forcing the Senate to vote on it and having Congressmen of courage introduce articles of Impeachment against Obama.
    We do not have a ‘broken’ immigration system. When officials don’t do their jobs, that isn’t a system broken, that is an non-enforced system that would otherwise work correctly.
    A President Romney had better darn well reverse the DHS policy if he expects to get my vote in 2012 or ever. I hope his consultants (paid worms) read this and understand that he can say GOODBYE to the base if he doesn’t abandon this ‘long-term’ solution nonsense.
    Enforcement of American law, jailing those who hire illegals and self-deportation through attrition will accomplish all the problems we have now with criminals living among us. If you’re here illegally, then YES, you are a stinking criminal.

    • acat

      See, smart people don’t start impeachment proceedings, when the Senate won’t convict, and when the election is less than a year out.

      Smart people work their asses off trying for regime change at the ballot box.

      Only short-sighted idiots would call for impeachment with 6 months left, handing Obama the perfect “They’re persecuting me!” card to rally his base supporters.

      Am I pissed off about this rule-of-executive-fiat? Yes. Do I want the stuttering charlie-foxtrot of a president retired to Maui? Yes. (Chicago doesn’t want him back!) Do I think the best way to get there is to go for an impeachment that can’t be won? Umm.. no.

      Get busy electing Romney.

      Mew

      • Christine

        We ruined any legitimate chance of pursuing impeachment for generations to come by doing so with Clinton. Now, no one understands how serious the process is supposed to be.

        It’s not a recall election people…you don’t just impeach someone you don’t like. It’s a serious process for serious offenses…crimes and fraud.

        I don’t like Obama. I want him defeated in November. I could go on and on about what he’s done to this country in less than 4 years. BUT, I do not see the charge of impeachment and those who call for it give weight to the left’s view of us…which is easily ignored on its own except that is what the uninformed hear from the Left Stream Media.

        And of course, as acat says…it can’t succeed with the current Senate.

    • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

      But if they won’t impeach him for the stuff he’s accountable for now/incompetence what makes you think he’s going to be impeached for this anytime soon?

      At this point if they ever get around to it he won’t be impeached until after the election is over which is not a bad thing in itself. If they impeach him now they just hand him a club to use for re-election and he can still spend tons of political capital to beat the impeachment ala Bubba even when it’s obvious he’s guilty to nearly everyone except the most gullible/fanatic ideologues.

      Of course he could still be impeached after the election which could have the pleasant effect of getting rid of him months early, stripping him of his federal pension and bodyguards and maybe sending him off to experience the penal system.

      But then that assumes there would be the will to impeach him and that will not come unless the elected officials are being drowned in requests/mail/email/constant screaming crowds/told by lobbyists they should do it or they won’t be reelected themselves… then it’s a maybe…

    • rightlane1111

      Not only do we have to work our behinds off to get Romney elected…we have to work like the dickens to get a super majority in both houses…JUST IN CASE Obamacare is upheld..or parts therein.

      I want to see the RINOs out…I want to see McConnell out as Senate Leader, should we win majority…and I want Boehner gone…AND NOT replaced with Canter.

      Should Obamacare pass…the parts that have NOTHING to do with healthcare…and have yet to be disclosed will bankrupt our country. Quite frankly…my question is…should I put the house up for sale in 2012 while (1) I don’t have to pay 3.8% on the purchase price and (2) the capital gains rate goes up…..short window…what to do? I wonder how many retired people are thinking the same thing?

      Oh…and let’s get student loans away from ANY GOVERNMENT control and assistance…it’s another FANNIE/FREDDIE waiting to happen.

  • GopTiger

    Your Imperial and Royal Majesty, if the United States Supreme Court dares rules against your job-creating, cost-lowering, deficit-reducing healthcare plan, will you ignore the Court’s ruling in much the same way you are ignoring the Congressional prerogative concerning immigration and deportation?

    Note- I did wait until after he finished his speech to pose this question.

  • tngal

    Reagan wavered…Amnesty for those who fall under category “X”.
    (A time frame, or job description, or some other point of inconsequential reference).

    And others who believe ,even now, those who were dragged across as children and have lived here a few years should be granted amnesty. (despite knowing for years their residency is unlawful)

    These little ‘caveats’, such as amnesty or acts , that are being carved out here and there have weakened the purpose of the laws. Weakening is the first step in a downward spiral to nullification. We crossed the first step awhile ago. Time to turn it around and firm it up again.

    There are laws. On the books. There are several ways to become a citizen. I am here because of one of those laws. Just follow the laws on the books and everything’s golden.

  • annas

    Is there no way to enforce our laws?

  • teapartypatriot4ever

    This is not about whether or not illegals should get legalized status or not, as there is as process by which that is handled, discussed, and resolved one way or another. What this is about is a sitting US President blatantly deliberately breaking the Laws of the United States of America, by either giving direct orders in direct conflict with such laws, against such laws already in statute, or direct orders to be non-compliant with United States Federal law, ie; the refusal to enforce Federal laws, which is a direct violation of the US Constitution, which the US President swears an oath to uphold, protect, and defend. And when such an oath of office is violated in such a manner, the Congress has the authority and responsibility to charge with impeachment against the US President, on such charges. As was the case with Richard Nixon, and should be the case with anyone who breaks US law, and defies the will of the American people against the Republic itself, as no one is above the Law.

    But unfortunately the Congress is filled with too many political ideological hacks and cowards called progressive GOP establishment RINO’s, not to mention the liberal Obamacratic supporters in the Senate, whose job it is to enforce those responsibilities and laws that they swore to uphold, protect, and defend, thus they have all but turned the US Congress into a political 3rd world banana republic circus, instead of the People’s Chamber where the People are supposed to be duly represented.

    Of course not all are like that, like Sen DeMint, Rep King, Rep West, Rep Ryan, Sen Issa, Sen Grassley, Sen Hatch, etc, are trying to fulfill their responsibilities and oath’s to the America People and the US Constitution in Congress.

    The losers in this breach of US Constitutional laws, as well as the moral, ethical, and official responsibility of the Federal govt. and it’s elected officials to perform their duties and responsibilities accordingly to the Laws of the Land, the US Constitution, as they were sworn to do, will be the American People and the Republic itself, if nothing respectively is done about it.

  • renny

    Congressional switchboard

  • infiltr8tr

    Yes friends, yet another treasure that the diversicrats would foist upon us in an effort to be “fair”. After all, we can’t let such a silly thing as public health get in the way of our “dream” now can we? read on.

    http://www.newser.com/story/148156/plague-making-a-comeback-among-the-rich.html?utm_source=part&utm_medium=inbox&utm_campaign=newser

  • http://www.chicagobluesgirl.com chicagobluesgirl

    Sufficiently ANGRY about KING Obama’s actions again side-stepping Congress and the American People by passing his own version of the Dream Act?? DO something about it! Follow this link and join Numbers USA where you can send free faxes to all of Congress and the King himself.

    https://www.numbersusa.com/content/action.html

  • evilbloggerlady

    That is the question.

    And it was only in 2011 that he was saying he could not do this. I have not seen evolution this quick since when I saw Prometheus last week!

  • doctorbob

    For the life of me, I simply do not understand why the Republicans in Congress (along with at least a few thinking Democrats) have not been SCREAMING THEIR LUNGS OUT over the outrageous – and unconstitutional – actions of the Oblamo administration. Oblamo does stuff like this, and there’s not even a WHIMPER out of Congress? Not a single word of protest? Frankly, I believe that my vote in November has been made clear. Vote against EVERY INCUMBENT!!! Throw out ALL the bums! ALL of them! Start with a clean slate. We’re never going to fix anything if this is what we’ve got for a Congress.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      That’s up to the activists.

      This is America. We have the first amendment. Quit waiting for somebody else to stand. Just do it?.

    • tnfriendofcoal101368

      Who should be doing the screaming; In November, they will get their chance. This is why the “vote nobody” crowd is so dangerous; they act like there are no consequences for their lack of vote. If you want to stop Obama, run to the polls to vote him out of office and push, pull, and drag your friends and cousins to do the same.

  • michaellaborde

    The senate demo-rats are the culprits here in agreeing with Obamaluninalatab and Eric the red Holder, red as in communist with letting his dictatorship and and their socialist policies stand. They agree with them. As with any power-hungry administration that was elected with a like minded electorate that has been duped into believing all sorts of misinformation and given crumbs to satisfied their appetites. Have HOPE that in November the power hungry infidels will be removed.

  • fishgod3

    Pass an Exec.. ORDER.

  • Pingback: Program tv

  • Pingback: Scott Goubeaux

  • Pingback: Lindsey Garlinger

  • Pingback: Google

  • Pingback: hier

  • Pingback: Herb Beetley

  • Pingback: Eric Llanes

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: Xiao Gemmill

  • Pingback: cleaning house

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: experienced

  • Pingback: noclegi zakopane

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: wedding magician

  • Pingback: skype

  • Pingback: Serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: liqueurs

  • Pingback: wedding dresses

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Egal Gabbay CA

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: Egal Gabbay

  • Pingback: τοποθετηση μαρμαρων

  • Pingback: Links Eintragen

  • Pingback: home distillers forum

  • Pingback: Dwight Protin

  • Pingback: Consuelo Mastoris

  • Pingback: Kevin Lefebre

  • Pingback: Titus Heady

  • Pingback: LawCrossing

  • Pingback: online music maker

  • Pingback: Nike NFL Jerseys

  • Pingback: teeth whitening light

  • Pingback: free shipping stores

  • Pingback: Koi

  • Pingback: hgh factor

  • Pingback: chapter 13 bankruptcy

  • Pingback: Payday Loans Online

  • Pingback: Restaurant in Vancouver for Sale

  • Pingback: survival bracelet kits

  • Pingback: distill wine

  • Pingback: this post

  • Pingback: spolki na sprzedaz

  • Pingback: Waylon Habash

  • Pingback: furniture

  • Pingback: perusahaan asuransi jiwa terbaik indonesia

  • Pingback: Fusevision.com.sg

  • Pingback: great

  • Pingback: finish touchup

  • Pingback: haine online

  • Pingback: buy facebook fans

  • Pingback: Pool Shop

  • Pingback: tn pas cher

  • Pingback: baby shower party favor gift

  • Pingback: คอนโดเอแบคบางนา

  • Pingback: wedding bridesmaid dresses

  • Pingback: advertising gifts

  • Pingback: Brain Birchard

  • Pingback: Carolee Rhoney

  • Pingback: Cell Phone Number Lookup

  • Pingback: How to lose weight fast

  • Pingback: florida no fault auto insurance

  • Pingback: sexy bikinis

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: 3 5 8 crown moulding dimensions in winter park

  • Pingback: Property Investment In Bali Indonesia

  • Pingback: buy adsense account

  • Pingback: online payday loans

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: Tyson Mcgorry

  • Pingback: Cathy Jess

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • Pingback: Slide

  • Pingback: criminal defense attorney glendale

  • Pingback: steve clarkson dream maker summer football camp

  • Pingback: emdr therapist

  • Pingback: what is extra virgin olive oil

  • Pingback: Any Option Day Trading

  • Pingback: Nanny Agency

  • Pingback: recommended emergency pediatric dentist

  • Pingback: medicare nursing home

  • Pingback: Look At This Site

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: Arkadas Bul

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: randki w rzeszowie

  • Pingback: observe this video clip

  • Pingback: same day payday loans

  • Pingback: casino gaming

  • Pingback: Yuk Mceneny

  • Pingback: http://bizfromhome.in/article.php?id=43437

  • Pingback: Kathryne Pavis

  • Pingback: Emile Ziebold

  • Pingback: Albert Burkhard

  • Pingback: standard cause

  • Pingback: Glen Rochholz

  • Pingback: Annemarie Hern

  • Pingback: organizzazione matrimoni toscana

  • Pingback: a few other resources

  • Pingback: Terrell Schlick

  • Pingback: requirements

  • Pingback: Free Money

  • Pingback: great webpage

  • Pingback: Cyprien

  • Pingback: Chase

  • Pingback: Gaylord

  • Pingback: Reed Majeske

  • Pingback: Quincy Seaburg

  • Pingback: Julie Quiroz

  • Pingback: cell towers investment

  • Pingback: express

  • Pingback: Eldon Quarry

  • Pingback: Ashly Saysithideth

  • Pingback: test answers and course notes

  • Pingback: nike free Run 2

  • Pingback: Randolph Lechman

  • Pingback: Rolf Brais

  • Pingback: Will Bruechert

  • Pingback: the motor club of america

  • Pingback: alfileres de boda

  • Pingback: Fisher Investments William Shepherd

  • Pingback: Exceptional

  • Pingback: Brenton Kowing

  • Pingback: Privacy remover

  • Pingback: Delta Mclafferty

  • Pingback: Dewey Ausherman

  • Pingback: Ezequiel Aloe

  • Pingback: Diseño web barato

  • Pingback: cage

  • Pingback: how to build backlinks

  • Pingback: upmc insurance quotes

  • Pingback: pittsburgh pc repair

  • Pingback: click this

  • Pingback: gotowanie

  • Pingback: backlinks

  • Pingback: Dressesonlinesale

  • Pingback: Wire Mesh Fence

  • Pingback: wholesale anime

  • Pingback: designer mens shirts

  • Pingback: Brier

  • Pingback: The Magic book by Rhonda Byrne

  • Pingback: cafe reviews

  • Pingback: buy african mango

  • Pingback: DayZ Items

  • Pingback: Willena Honsberger

  • Pingback: Stephen Benedetti

  • Pingback: Its lowers cholesterol

  • Pingback: Home Detox

  • Pingback: john thomas financial

  • Pingback: Compre e venda produtos de A a Z online e tenha uma loja como afiliado

  • Pingback: john thomas financial

  • Pingback: football free bets

  • Pingback: Bari

  • Pingback: UK Football Betting

  • Pingback: horoscopes

  • Pingback: Compare Payday Loans

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: Peter Rasnick

  • Pingback: diet solutions reviews

  • Pingback: janitor service

  • Pingback: Janitorial Service Seattle

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: good read

  • Pingback: honda san diego

  • Pingback: Derek Iozzi

  • Pingback: Learn Guitar Online

  • Pingback: Bethany Kauahi

  • Pingback: Pilates Studio Los Angeles

  • Pingback: Very yrev test

  • Pingback: Cheap Web hosting

  • Pingback: Kristian Medler

  • Pingback: pool prices

  • Pingback: forex tablet pc

  • Pingback: texas driver education

  • Pingback: Jess Schouweiler

  • Pingback: Sail Croatia

  • Pingback: olive garden coupons

  • Pingback: Website

  • Pingback: Hisako Rozar

  • Pingback: Military flag frames

  • Pingback: Your #1 urban lifestyle destination

  • Pingback: www.eztraffic.org

  • Pingback: Cliff Deoliveira

  • Pingback: Illegal Immigration - Realities! | Internet-Scam-Busters.Com

  • Seedyrom

    Even Telemunodo’s Jos? D?az-Balart said its a delay to deportation at best. With that slam its not going anywhere this term. If reelected Obama will do nothing.

    Harry Reid promised immigration reform to get reelected and has done nothing, no major talk, just the usual BS. Even Hispanics know this is a sucker ploy at best. Close the border then think about asking the people what they really want.

    I’d rather see a voter referendum than let DC pols make the decision.