« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

EPA Mandates Use of Nonexistent Fuel Blend

It’s bad enough that government regulations and environmental legal defense groups have prevented us from building oil refineries for over 30 years.  It’s even worse when the existing ones are forced to blend fuel mixtures that don’t exist.

We are all painfully aware of the Soviet style mandate that requires 10% of petroleum to be comprised of ethanol.  This unconstitutional mandate has killed jobs, driven up the cost of fuel and food, lowered gas mileage, and damaged car engines – all to benefit corporate cronies in Big Ag.  This odious fuel source is primarily made from corn.  But since 2010, the EPA has mandated the blending of more than 20 million gallons of cellulosic biofuel into the nation’s fuel supply.  The problem is that while creating efficacious fuel from grass, wood, and algae might sound great in theory, it doesn’t exist on the commercial fuel market.

On December 19, 2007, President Bush signed a disastrous socialist energy bill that contained numerous green energy mandates and subsidies.  It also banned the sale of incandescent light bulbs.  The “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007” passed with support from 39 Republican senators and 95 Republican congressmen.  It created a Renewable Fuels Mandate requiring that 22 billion gallons of renewables be blended into our gasoline supply by 2016 and 36 billion gallons by 2022.  The bill also created a few sub-mandates, one of which required a blend of 100 million gallons of cellulosic biofuel by 2010, rising to 250 million in 2011, 500 million in 2012, and 16 billion by 2022.  The bill also established a tax credit of $1.01 per gallon produced.

Despite the tremendous tailwinds of tax credits and the boot of the government used to force fuel blenders to purchase cellulosic fuels, the industry has failed to perform magic and become commercially viable during the past 5 years.  Some of the plants that were given subsidies to produce this phantom fuel were never even built.  Yes – this is a scandal far worse than Solyndra.

What is even more scandalous is that oil companies are forced to pay a tax for not blending this phantom fuel!

Because oil companies are deemed to be in violation of the renewable fuels mandate, they are forced to purchase waiver credits from the EPA or face large fines.  Oil companies have been forced to pay $14 million in these credits so far (more than all the green energy companies have paid in taxes).  Yes, indeed we already have a cap and trade program in place.

At present, there is a pending lawsuit against the EPA over the phantom fuel mandate filed through the D.C. Circuit Court by industry groups.  However, we cannot count on the courts to uphold the Constitution.  After all, liberal judges hold that government can regulate inactivity, presumably, even if that activity doesn’t exist.  John Roberts would probably say that the mandates are fine because they morph into a form of taxation.  As such, it is incumbent upon Congress to overturn this preposterous law – one that exemplifies the inanity of Washington bureaucracy.

To that end, Congressman Jeff Flake has introduced H.R. 6047 – the Phantom Fuel Reform Act.  This bill simply prescribes that the EPA’s annual cellulosic biofuel mandates reflect more realistic production-based projections, which, in this case, would be 0 gallons.  This is a no brainer bill that should be brought to the floor under suspension.  Let Democrats go on record as supporting higher gas prices for the purpose of continuing a mandate that defies gravity.

This is just the first step.  When Republicans win back the Senate and the White House, they must repeal the 2007 energy bill – lock, stock, and barrel.  It is the Obamacare of the energy industry.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • ohiohistorian

    Then the buses could go nowhere, just like his campaign is headed.

    • From ME to You

      The Obama Admin is forcing the Navy and the Air Force to use biofuels…why aren’t they???

  • Michael M. Keohane

    to accomplish with the present Senate. However, it would be perfect justice to deprive the Democratic candidates at all levels from using any other fuel for their campaign vehicles. Can you see a bunch of Democratic candidates on bicycles traveling from rally to rally.

  • jakee308

    The oil companies aren’t babies, If this really bothered them, they’d sue over it.

    Somehow they’ve figured out a way to make money or deduct this from their taxes is my guess.

    Either that or they don’t mind as when the additive finally becomes available they can cash in on it.

    If they’re not doing anything about it, it’s not a problem yet.

    • http://madisonproject.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      There is a lawsuit pending in the DC Circuit

      • edintexas

        Don’t confuse him with the facts. His inability to understand there was a lawsuit filed from the article either reflects on his reading comprehension, or he posted without bothering to read the article. Either way, his mind was already made up before he saw this article.

      • rbdwiggins

        An enterprising lawyer should take this opportunity to once again challenge the EPA’s Endangerment Findings, and in particular, the DC Circuit’s own opinion in Coalition For Responsible Regulation, et al v. EPA.

        It appears, just one day after the Court issued the opinion, the IPCC admitted the “Skeptics” were right and the InterAcademy Council (IAC) agreed that the previous four Synthesis Reports and Summaries for Policy Makers were agenda-driven pseudo-scientific bunk.

        H/T: Joseph Bast – The Heartland Institute

    • funwithknives

      is a really Ostrich-type method of looking at a Government-Induced form of robbery. your second line says it all.
      You know so little about Econ#101 you just accept what ever hits ya’ and ‘that is that’. How can you write down (on your taxes) a Governmental Fine, and do it legally?
      Tell us all when you find That Loophole….., and how do you make money from a loss on a non-existent product?

      The ‘evil oil companies’ , for now just roll these costs into their product lines’ pricing. For Now, but it’s gonna change…..
      Like David explains, there is a law suit,and it will come to fruition.
      Meanwhile, do not think for one blessed minute that you will not see **Ads to America**, explaining the costs they are paying for this Hubris In Government.
      Obie could snap his slender Semi-Bony fingers, scribble an E O, and make this leave as-if by Magic(!), on-the-morrow.

      But alas, ’twill not be a-happenin’……
      The Proletariat ‘s just gotta suck it up, and be happy in their labor.
      (If they Have a job…)

      He’s got more oppressed minorities to assist. …and only 109 days to do it in.

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      Kramer: “Don’t worry, Jerry. It’s a write-off.”

      Seinfeld: “You don’t even know what a write off is!”

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      I sure like us evil oil people being the bad guys than the way it was in the 1980′s with low prices and no jobs.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    They should just fire everyone and start over.

  • From ME to You

    5 environmentally friendly caught lobsters!

    5 Lobsters  320x98
  • updoc101

    The government should sharply raise the mandate for ethanol use in motor fuels, setting a floor for alternative and renewable fuel use in 2017 that is equal to seven times the current ethanol output. GW Bush 2007

    WASHINGTON (CNNMoney.com) — President Bush said the United States should “get off oil” Wednesday as crude prices hit record highs and renewed his support for ethanol use despite concerns the corn-based fuel is driving up food prices and isn’t more environmentally friendly than gasoline.

    “We gotta get off oil, American has got to change its habits,” Bush told a crowd at the Washington International Renewable Energy Conference, a meeting of global energy officials and an adjoining trade show that’s the largest all-renewables show ever held in the United States. “It should be obvious to all, demand has outstripped supply, which makes prices go up.”
    It wasn’t Obamas idea. It was the Republicans.

    • rbdwiggins

      The recoil from that ridiculous stretch of the imagination might accidentally slap some sense into you…

    • funwithknives

      but where in all that is Holy did that ‘s’ come from?
      {You know, tagged onto ‘Republican’, there at the end of your little screed?}

      He did not speak for a large bunch of Republicans , as-witnessed by the Neo-Con slide downwards. It’s how Barry got in.
      ” Disgust With Dilution”, in a very few words.
      Put down the Broad Brush, buddy.
      You’re gettin’ it, all over you……..

      • funwithknives

        Troll Alert.

        ‘updoc101′ just now got here and it seems he’s got some
        “reality-based cognizance difficulties”.

        …and he is a really sloppy “painter”.

    • papabear

      Or do you just have reading comprehension issues?

      To quote the article On December 19, 2007, President Bush signed a disastrous socialist energy bill that contained numerous green energy mandates and subsidies.

      The point of the article was that we should work to overturn a bad energy bill that embodies Obama’s philosophy. The fact that a RINO signed it does not make it more palatable.

      The cold hard truth is that Obama’s administration is enforcing this law with gusto. If they don’t agree with a law, they won’t (i.e. DOMA, Black Panther Voting Rights, etc.).

    • Bill S

      It was George W. Bush’s. And in case you missed it, many Republicans weren’t all that enthralled with a lot of Bush’s policies and proposals.

      Pretty weak troll effort, Sparky. Try again. I’m sure you can do better.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      the idiotic ethanol project was indeed pushed primarily by Republicans. That old Rino Bob Dole was number one behind it in the early days because, of course, his state grew lots of corn.

      Republicans are not clean on this and a variety of other boondoggles which just makes our job harder because we not only have to defeat Democrats we have to defeat big spending Repubs.

  • Pingback: Improve The Present Ecological Crisis By Thinking Green | teacherspublications.com

  • Pingback: mehr...

  • Pingback: How Being Eco-Friendly Can Help Preserve Our Planet | vpibasketball community blogs

  • Pingback: Thank Bipartisan Committee Work for Corporate Welfare in Tax Bill | Irascible Musings