« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Mr. Speaker, Tear Up This Farm Bill

Dear Speaker Boehner,

During every election cycle, virtually every Republican candidate affirms his or her support for limited government, free markets, and balanced budgets.  They all tout their conservative credentials on the flashy flag-waving issues of the day in an effort to ingratiate themselves with Republican primary voters.  However, it is the “inside baseball” issues such as the farm bill that expose many of them as frauds.

Put simply, the farm bill is an anathema to free enterprise, limited government, and individual responsibility.  The House version (H.R. 6083) authorizes $957 billion in spending over 10 years, 80% of which will go towards food stamps.  Despite erroneous claims in the media regarding severe cuts to food stamps, this bill actually consummates the Obama-era baseline into our entitlement empire forever.

Furthermore, this bill adds an additional 3 crop insurance and price support programs that distort the market, encourage risky behavior, protect parochial interests, and are tendentious towards large farms.  This bill also continues the egregious coddling of rich sugar farmers and the dairy supply regulations that you so aptly referred to as “Soviet style.”

Unfortunately, a bipartisan group of 38 Republicans and 24 Democrats, led by Reps. Kristi Noem (R-SD) and Peter Welch (D-VT), have sent you a letter requesting floor consideration for this big-government, budget-busting monstrosity.  If Republicans allow this bill to pass the House and become law under Republican-control of Congress, they will essentially be abrogating all their campaign promises to limit government, terminate special interest politics, decrease dependency and welfare, and balance the budget.  In one fell swoop, they will blur the distinction between the two parties to the extent that they are virtually indistinguishable.

This is not the message we need to telegraph to loyal Republican voters ahead of a crucial election.  Moreover, if we are going to continue the bond between urban and rural special interests, we will never wean dependency from the broad populace – even among those in conservative states.  If we are going to continue imposing Soviet-style intervention in red states, and elect representatives from those localities who support such odious policies, where are we going to implement free market policies and elect conservatives?  From blue America?

Let’s win this election decisively by standing on the bold free market, limited government principles that buoyed the Republican majority into power in 2010.  Then, after assuming control of all branches of government, we can pursue new policies from a position of strength.

Let’s begin by decoupling food stamp spending from agriculture programs so we can break the indissoluble bond between multiple special interest groups.  We understand that food stamps and agriculture programs will not disappear overnight, but we must recognize their deleterious effects on our economy, free markets, and self respect.  And it must be our ultimate goal to phase out and wind down these programs in an effort to restore our Constitutional Republic to the entity that it was when originally conceived.

Please reject all calls to bring this bill to the floor during this Congress.  Now is the time for us to stand on principle.

 

***Here are the members who took a leadership role in pushing the Speaker to radically expand the size of government:***

Update: The original bipartisan letter erroneously listed Sam Graves as representing Georgia.  He represents Missouri.  Tom Graves represents Georgia and is not a supporter of this bill.

Kristi Noem (R-S.D.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Robert Schilling (R-Ill.), Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas), Bill Owens (D-N.Y.), Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), Leonard Boswell (D-Iowa), Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio), Tim Walz (D-Minn.), Austin Scott (R-Ga.), Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.), Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.), Tim Johnson (R-Ill.), Steve King (R-Iowa), Bob Gibbs (R-Ohio), Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.), David Loebsack (D-Iowa), Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.), Jim Costa (D-Calif.), Rick Berg (R-N.D.), Larry Kissell (D-N.C.), Jo Ann Emerson (R-Mo.), Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.), Gregorio Sablan (D-MP), Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.), Chris Gibson (R-N.Y.), Steve LaTourette (R-Ohio), Sam Graves (R-MO.), Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.), Jeff Landry (R-La.), Thomas Rooney (R-Fla.), Martha Roby (R-Ala.), Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.), Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), Tim Holden (D-Pa.), Kathy Hochul (D-N.Y.), John Garamendi (D-Calif.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.), Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.), Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), Tom Latham (R-Iowa), Chellie Pingree (D-Maine), Sanford Bishop Jr. (D-Ga.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Dan Benishek (R-Mich.), Billy Long (R-Mo.), Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), Joe Courtney (D-Conn.), Mike McIntyre (D-N.C.), Aaron Schock (R-Ill.), Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.), Charles Boustany Jr. (R-La), Dan Lungren (R-Calif.), Candice Miller (RMich).

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • oldredtop

    One correction I would like to suggest on your last sentence…how about a change from “Now is the time for us to stand on principle.” to “Now is the time for YOU to stand on principle, Mr. Speaker”.

    He needs to lead, follow, or get out of the way…

    Thanks.

    • michaelbowler

      Gee, what a surprise…the republicans are selling their voters out…AGAIN.

      Is anyone surprised, really?

    • kopen

      you are treading on us, and leading the way to more Government .. you lied about your commitment to Constitutional principles .. you and too many of your rhinos are saying what ever it takes to get elected , but back down too easily .. you are not looking out for the citizens of this Country ..you are just as responcible for this mess the Country is in as Obama .. Get a back bone, your limp noodle approach is not working for “We the People” ..
      God Bless America

  • Vegas_Rick

    As usual, his representative on the phone had no clue about his stance on this and promised to get back to me. I let her know in very clear terms that this bill should never go to the floor, and why.

    I worked hard to kick Dina Titus to the curb in ’10. Don’t make me do it to you Joe.

    Everyone, please contact your congresscritter and stand against this bloated big government debacle.

  • renny

    as I have written several times before: the length of the orig. Civil Rights bill in 1964.

    Food Stamps takes up 64% of this 1000-page farm bill monster and should be its own bill.

    All the supports should be separated out and addressed individually, and if Cong. doesn’t like that approach, they should stop spending tax money to pay for non-growth of crops or raising prices artificially on actual commodities that causes pain for all shoppers and inflation in the ag. markets.

    • Common_Cents

      Every congressperson should be required to pass a comprehension test on the major points of each bill prior to voting, otherwise no vote.

      Let’s start with a quiz on the freakin constitution, many many congresspeople would fail. automatic booted from congress.

      Every bill should be sent to a panel of 15 yr olds and 80% of them must be able to pass a comprehension test as well.

      Each bill should consist of one major topic only, This would obviously slow down congress in passing sausage(big bonus) and also make their voting records much more accurate. (no more weaseling out of voting against a bill for some stupid non related piece of it)

    • Cornholio

      …allocate at least 1 day prior to a floor vote per 20 pages of legislation so as to allow congressmen sufficient time to read it.

      Seems wise that our leaders should be forced to read the words that confiscate and redistribute untold amounts of wealth – before they vote on it.

  • checkmate2012

    with a bill that is solely focused on farming and none of the other programs stuffed in it. And you are right, it is anti-free-market principles. When you have that many Dems and Reps supporting it, you know there’s a reason to be suspicious on its merits.

    It also seems to incorporate the “too big to fail” syndrome and those that may need a subsidy are the least likely to get one.

    Per a great article on Heritage.org, http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/06/farm-bill-2012-agriculture-policy-ripe-for-reform:

    “Nearly 80 percent of farms with gross cash farm income of $250,000 to $999,999 receive government payments, compared to 24 percent of farms with gross cash farm income of $10,000 to $249,999.3″

    The current bill expires on Sept. 30 and rather than pass this monstocity, it should be extended until real reform can be realized, after the election unfortunately.

  • radioone

    There is NO Way “Boehner and Crew” will stop this. “It’s for the Children”……especially the illegal Children.

    PS. Jeff Sessions just told Mark Levin that GWB signed the authorization on the “Mexican” foodstamps in 2002. Levin almost had a heart attack.

    • checkmate2012

      won’t release any info on the agreement with Mexico…so far. Now what are they hiding? If it was all Bush’s fault, they’d be quick to place blame but seemingly can’t if they are perpetuating the practice.

    • Common_Cents

      You won’t get this BS and you’ll have more accurate voting records.

      CONgress sucks when it comes to rules. Too many “slick” attorneys thinking they are too smart and crafty.

  • renl57

    “South Dakota needs a voice in Congress that will work to reduce wasteful spending and offer a plan for reducing our national debt. I promise to be that voice.”

    “I fought hard to secure provisions in this [farm] bill to benefit South Dakota. Our state came out strong in this Farm Bill, and I will keep fighting to see that our interests are protected as the legislation moves forward.?

    http://www.kristiforcongress.com/issues/

    Rep. Hoem, I do have a question!

    • riverwood

      No legislator, state or federal, stands a chance of reelection if they don’t support the farm bill, or disaster aid in the event of a drought, flood, tornado or blizzard. SD, ND, IA, MO, NE, MN, etc will always have both Republicans and Democrats working side by side to protect the family farm. That is why Dems continue to be reelected in those states decade after decade. And any Rep. Who votes to kill a farm bill will have a very short career in Washington

      • checkmate2012

        to put forth a real farm bill that addresses family farms if anything, not big Farma which this bill does. In the end, subsidies raise the price of food, just like subsidies do to college, housing, etc.

        Get the gov’t out of the way and help when help is needed. This bill gives incentives to take more risks knowing the taxpayer will come to the rescue. We’ve seen this movie before and it doesn’t end well.

        • riverwood

          Bit the farm bill encourages corporate style farming on family farms. That’s why there is no more crop rotation, or crop diversity. All the farmers raise roundup ready corn and soybeans and pay through the nose to license the seed technology and chemicals. And it mostly goes to ethanol production. So, we pay farmers to raise massive quantities of corn and subsidize ethanol producers to turn that corn into substandard fuel. And then beef and dairy prices rise because of scarce livestock feeds. And the wheel goes round and round

      • http://madisonproject.com/ Daniel Horowitz

        only true as long as they continue telegraphic the expectation of government intervention. We’re not going to end it over night, but we need to move in that direction instead of guaranteeing them 90% of their income and creating more programs. A couple of Kansas members are already doing that.

        Besides, where else are we going to elect limited government supporter of the free market? In urban districts? The bottom line is that we have to start somewhere and that has to be in the districts that are naturally suspicious of government. Otherwise, we will never get anywhere and will continue growing government through the greatest common factor of everyone’s special interest expenditures. This example in Oklahoma is very illustrative of the point

      • Cornholio

        From the IA GOP platform:

        ” We oppose agricultural subsidies and manipulation of commodity prices by government. We believe that the farms subsidy program should be reviewed and gradually phased out.”

        http://iowagop.org/platform.php

        Of course, there’s a lot of liberals in Iowa too, so maybe GOP support is not by itself enought.

        • riverwood

          A platform is a great guidebook, but really, no elected official really gives two hoots about it. It’s just something they can point to while campaigning.

  • krish

    As expected, most congressmen & women from Midwest & farm belt support this bill so that they can get the goodies to their states & get re-elected! This has been going on for centuries….do not see how one can stop this practice!

    What is sad, every congress member has one or two such pet pork project that will help their states! The root cause is getting re-elected anyway possible even if the country goes to hell! Term limits for politicians is the only way! Both dems & republicans would join forces & will never allow that to happen!

    As long as RINOs like Boehner, McConnell are in power & calling the shots…there is no hope for this country! I am worried that whatever little conservative ideas that Mitt has & wants to implement, these two guys will never let him do that!

  • gmhunt

    1. Boehnor did not have to be “pushed”, he loves big government and he loves spending..
    2. MOST of all the Government needs to get out of the Farming business altogether…….
    3. The Food Stamp program needs to be “down” sized……..NO Illegals……
    4. ALL this spending is started by the Lobbyist, if the American People would realize that without lobbyist to throw money at re-election campaigns, then thier would be a lot less spending by our so called Representatives……. Lobbying at ALL levels of Government needs to be outlawed………

  • bobguzzardi

    Good work, Daniel, in naming names in this Republican corporate welfare bill.

    The Republicans have the power to veto this overspending bill and act consistently with Constitutional principles of Limited Government and Free Markets for Free People. US House Republican leadership, like Republican leadership in Pennsylvania State House and State Senate and Governor’s office, sells out The Forgotten Taxpayer …repeatedly.

    Double Talking Demagoguery is not a monopoly of Double Talking Democrats.

  • bobguzzardi

    Will you be in Jacksonville?

    Madison Project is impressive piece of work. thanks

  • davenj1

    Agricultural bills are nothing but huge government intrusions into the free market. In fact, subsidies actually hurt free trade with new markets and artificially inflate the price of food. Just look at the protection the domestic sugar industry receives. And as someone else noted, the food stamp program is not an agricultural policy and should not be in any such bill. It should be stand-alone legislation and separate appropriation.
    Why do the non-subsidized products perform equally well, if not better, in the free market? And crop insurance is nothing more than a government-run monopoly. I understand the politics as concerns the farm states, but enough is enough. The fact is that agriculture in America will survive quite well without a farm bill every 5 years just as people will travel on roads despite a transportation bill every 6 years! New Zealand ceased subsidies years ago. After an initial transitional period, they diversified their agricultural portfolio beyond sheep, sheep, and only sheep. Anyone had New Zealand wine lately?

    One last thing: the Norman Rockwell days of the “family farm” are long over. Its ironic that the same people who rail about bank bailouts and stimulus packages are the same ones to vote for these agricultural bills. Actually, its not ironic; its hypocritical and if there is one think I dislike more than a red-head, it is a hypocrite (apologies to the red-heads).

  • spolson

    for the list. I will put it up on my Rino board and let them know how I feel about this.

  • ihateliberals

    thisis no surprise. This number comes from the Heritage Action group. congress as a whole votes liberal 60% of the time as well. with Republicans like these who needs Democrats? For so many years the base of the Republican party was Conservative. sometime in the last two decades the left has been infiltrating the Party and actually made a push when Micheal Steele was the RNC chairman to push Conservatives out altogether. Now people have to realize that just because a candidate is Republican doesn’t mean they aren’t Liberal. A liberal or moderate Republican is about as useful as trying to use a lead brick as a floatation device while swimming. There is now what I would call the left-wing of the Republican Party and that is where Boehner , McCain, McConnell and many other so called Party leaders reside. As tough as AZ is on many conservative agenda items they still sent that worthless McCain back to DC for six more years. That hurts the Nation when states do this. Congressmen elections are no longer local issues. what these people do when they are in DC is what matters not that new bridge across the River to nowhere they got put in.

  • rhclaryjr

    . . . that the Tea Party continues to identify those RINOs — those fair weather conservatives — that promised us fiscal restraint then bowed to King Barry the First as he pursues his goal of wrecking OUR country.

    Then let us all promise to kick out those liars along with the King and his court.

  • noquarter

    be stopped, but the chances Boehner will table it is next to none. Whey we continue putting our trust on him is unbelievable and that goes for the other “talk alot”. Sen. McConnell. Mark Levin, is right, these two are not for the people, only to protect their jobs. With the Leftist media, you heard very little of this bill and now its, surprising everyone with its give away program. One can bet the farm, that the socialist led administration is leading us to insolvency and obama is doing his behind the scenes to insure the passage of this debt creator and vote getter. One cannot watch this country being eviscerated by one party and supported by RINO’s. Mark Levin, is correct in his book Ameritopia and should be required reading.

  • brojohn2

    I sent this note to Quico Canseco today:
    80% of the money goes to Food Stamps? Please Food Stamps should not be a part of the Farm Bill, and neither should subsidies for rich farmers/sugar growers and others. It is time for us to stand up and say NO!
    Read this article on Red State please and vote NO on this terrible bill.
    http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/07/19/mr-speaker-tear-up-this-farm-bill/

    It is past time for our Representatives and Senators to stand up and be counted. NO MORE SPENDING!

    • demsaresatanic

      Agriculture dept is in reality the dept of foodstamps, agriculture is only a sideline.

  • poorwilber

    ….where Captain “Reglegs”, while pursuing Wales says….”there ain’t no end to doing right”. “Granny” then laughs at his pretentious arrogance.

    It seems that both establishment GoPers and Socialist Democrats share Captain “Redlegs” world view….and both are the architects of the road to hell.

  • Pingback: Blog

  • Pingback: Keven Khalsa