« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Mitt Romney Fans the Flames of Free Market Energy Policy

Mitt Romney actually stood for bold colors yesterday.  For conservatives, it should be the biggest story of the week.

Conservatives are rightfully focused on the impending tax cliff that is facing American taxpayers at the end of the year.  But we must not forget the subsidy cliff either.  Dozens of special interest tax preferences, known as tax extenders, are slated to expire at the end of the year.  Those extenders related to green energy are nothing more than handouts ensconced in the tax code.  We must be vigilant of any effort to slip in these extenders as part of a final agreement on the broader tax issue

At the end of every calendar year, Congress passes a ‘tax extenders’ bill to temporarily reauthorize specific tax breaks that have not been permanently written into law.  These bills have traditionally dealt with issues like the AMT patch, the R&D business credits, and universal deductions for depreciation, as well as state and local taxes.

In recent years, tax extenders have been magnets for non-universal carve-outs for green energy.  Some of those carve-outs, such as the 30% Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and the 45-cent per gallon Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit, have already expired.  Other handouts, like the lobbyist-driven 2.2 cent/per kilowatt-hour Production Tax Credit (PTC) for wind, is slated to expire this December 31.  In both cases, there is still time to reauthorize the tax credits because they are backward-looking and do not affect withholdings.

We must kill them now.

While almost every Republican likes to poke fun of Obama for Solyndra and his solar subsidies, wind subsidies are, for some reason, in vogue with many members.  The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), the most vocal supporter of the PTC, is busy lining the campaign coffers of members on both sides of the aisle.  The PTC is a refundable tax credit, one that the industry openly admits to serving as the lifeblood of wind production.  Proponents of big wind have posted an elaborate PDF showing just how many jobs will be lost if the PTC is not extended.  The problem is that they are proving our point.  If an industry cannot sustain a single job without the government, they should wait until their product becomes more profitable and actually works in the real world.  Their spurious predictions of future success are just not grounded in reality at this point.  They’ve been predicting that self-sufficiency would be just around the corner for the past 35 years.

Thankfully, Mitt Romney has come out strongly against this boondoggle.  The Des Moines Register reports that Romney has definitively ruled out extension of the PTC:

“He will allow the wind credit to expire, end the stimulus boondoggles, and create a level playing field on which all sources of energy can compete on their merits,” Shawn McCoy, a spokesman for Romney’s Iowa campaign, said in the statement. “Wind energy will thrive wherever it is economically competitive, and wherever private sector competitors with far more experience than the president believe the investment will produce results.”

This is welcome news to those of us who are looking for a fight over free markets, especially in the energy sector.  The federal government’s promotion of this inefficient energy source, in conjunction with state mandates on wind and solar, has contributed to the rising cost of electricity – just the way Obama wanted it.

A number of Republican governors and members of Congress are jumping on the corporate welfare bandwagon.  Kudos to Romney for not joining them and for tossing out some red meat for us free marketers.  More please!

COMMENTS

  • APA Guy

    This is why I like Romney as our nominee more with each passing day. I have many issues with him, but his stance on free-market economics isn’t one of them. I can see gas prices returning to palatable levels once he is running the show in the White House.

    Oh, BTW…$3.75/gallon in NE Indiana this morning.

  • bicentennialguy

    I agree – Romney is growing more and more on me everyday. I must admit I was not his biggest fan, but I am certain that he’s a very decent man.

    I just wrote a research paper about hydraulic fracturing and North America’s energy potential. It is truly astonishing what is here and what we could with it if only the catterwalling of the willfully ignorant and nefarious amongst our policy makers were rooted out, removed and cast into the dustbin of history.

    “Progressive” is the number one euphemism of our time.

    • emptybucket

      people that don’t know what they are talking about comment on. Here in NY especially. Geesh, ;-)

      Will your paper be published? Would certainly like to read it and become even more saavy with our responses to those around us shouting that stupid “no frack” phrase. It boggles the mind how truly ignorant the narrow minded are.

      • bicentennialguy

        I wrote it for a college composition class, so I doubt it will be published. However, I did get 160 points out of 160 on it!

        • emptybucket

          subject matter now that the dems have convinced those who know nothing about it, that it is evil.

          wow 160 out of 160!!!!

  • teaforme2012

    at its worst. And wind energy is the feel good, do nothing energy. Romney is right to allow these credits to expire. I do take issue with continuing every fossil fuel subsidy known to man, however. Frankly, I can’t follow the conservative position on this anymore. Boehner says the Foreign Tax Credit needs to be examined, but I’m not sure that ever gets anywhere. Some of these green energy subsidies are wasteful, but amount to nothing compared to the billions in oil handouts. I don’t think we can make a serious case about budgets and debts without addressing the fact that not every fossil fuel subsidy is good for America.

    • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

      I hadn’t yet read this piece, so I can only slightly remember what he said, but I though he mentioned that it went through “without (something).” Was it “without extenders”?

      My theory has been that the failure to pass budgets for three years has been an intentional strategy, just so that the budget can be “continued” through resolution at the very high level of 2009 without having to argue over details. This makes me think I have been right.

  • emptybucket

    area with huge wind turbines atop them. Have never researched to see if they were government bought. hum.

    Mitt Romney has been my choice from the beginning as I ticked off all the reasons the others would not make it through the primary process. He is slowly winning over the doubters, yes I know he is not as conservative as we’d like here in our household, but there is a strength and boldness beginning to show that we like!

    Thank you Daniel for your diary. Am thinking of this line from a movie in regards to the special lobbies and their tax entenders – “kill them, kill them all”.

    Wipe out any politician’s ability to participate in green energy that does not have enough private funds or interest to evolve into a viable business. The government doesn’t need to be dreaming of windmills.

  • jmike718

    You mean the biggest news for conservatives wasn’t Mitt gushing over the Socialized health care system of Israel? This guy’s a joke. Which is why I voted for Rick Santorum.

    • gekster

      nt

      • gekster

        eennnteee

    • Zaber

      He’s the person we need to elect this cycle. If you’re just going to badmouth him, maybe this isn’t the right site for you.

    • http://madisonproject.com/ Daniel Horowitz

      jmike,

      I’ve been one of the most critical conservatives of Romney’s candidacy from beginning to end, especially as it relates to Romneycare. But at the end of the day, it’s about principles more than personalities. And when he does something good, I’ll praise him for it. Likewise, if he supports anti free-market stuff, we’ll continue to whip him in line.

      • lineholder

        I absolutely despise socialized health care. On one hand, it is a mechanism by which the left is attempting to move us in the direction of a more statist form government with government constantly and repeatedly stripping away at our freedom and independence. On the other hand, it is also a means by which quality of care provided with our health care system is going to drop, and as someone who tends to look at broad-spectrum societal influence, I’m not ignorant of what kinds of outcomes we’ll be seeing once that takes place.

        But I will say this for Romney. When it comes to understanding the correlation between free-market economic opportunities and how this impacts individual freedom, he does seem to “get it”. And he is expressing that he is on the side of individual freedom and individual success rather than all the collectivist jargon the left spouts.

        I’ll stand behind him 100% of the way as long as holds to true to those principles.

        BTW, fits in with this topic of conversation…Romney new ad called “Believe In Our Future”

    • Common_Cents

      nt

    • Bill S

      ….your value-add to this site is quite low. If you are here to tear down our candidate, then leave. If you have some constructive criticisms, feel free to offer them.

      Or leave.

    • bobguzzardi

      Rick Santorum was financed and supported by Union Organizers and their vast resources of volunteers to get out the vote for Republicans like Rick Santorum and Arlen Specter.

      Barry Rubin at PJMedia Mitt Romney Captures Jerusalem wrote:

      “And then Romney added something that might become one of his most important lines in the months to come: Capitalism was the only economic system in history to raise people from poverty and create a huge middle class.” http://pjmedia.com/barryrubin/2012/07/29/presidential-candidate-mitt-romney-captures-jerusalem/2

      and Big Journalism reports that the Democratically controlled media How AP, NPR lied about Romney ‘Jewish donors’ speech, using Palestinian propaganda and Breitbart points out that Mitt Romney’s statement that ” It is neither controversial nor racist to describe cultural differences between societies–or even within societies–as a factor in creating different economic outcomes. ”

      http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/07/30/How-the-AP-and-NPR-Lied-About-Romney-Jewish-Donors-Speech-Using-Palestinian-Propaganda

      If you want free money, Vote for the Other Guy

      Question from woman in Peoria, Illinois: “So you?re all for like, ‘yay, freedom,’ and all this stuff. And ‘yay, like pursuit of happiness.’ You know what would make me happy? Free birth control.”

      Romney: “You know, let me tell you, no no, look, look let me tell you something. If you?re looking for free stuff you don?t have to pay for, vote for the other guy. That?s what he?s all about, okay? That?s not, that?s not what I?m about.” http://nation.foxnews.com/mitt-romney/2012/03/20/romney-schools-heckler-if-you-want-free-stuff-vote-obama

      video worth watching less than a minute March 20, 2012

    • teaforme2012

      but Romney is our guy, and frankly, I’m realistic enough to know that none of the conservative candidates we had could have beaten Obama. Romney may look like a country club bumbler at times, but can you imagine what the Democrats would have done with Santorum, or Gingrich, or Bachmann? It would not have been pretty. Our best hope is to sit back and hope the economy stays flat until November, when Americans have had enough of Obama and vote him out. It’s not going to be a pro-Romney vote, but who cares?

      I’d rather be disappointed by Romney going moderate again than 4 more years of Mr. Hope and Change. Eventually a real conservative will come along again, but until then, let’s just get rid of the socialist.

  • garfieldjl

    I hope he is serious about it, cause I want this green energy scam shut down.

    If it becomes economical to use wind or solar, then we will start using it, but trying to manipulate the markets to force it on people through government is just another abuse of power.

    • teaforme2012

      One of the problems is that China is not just buying oil. They are investing in renewable energy through stimulus and other government programs and using their size and capital to dominate the market. American investors are forced to either sell, or get crushed. It’s like Gilded Age Rockefeller and Carnegie stuff. They can call it capitalism all they want, but the Chinese government does not care what’s fair or ethical. They will take losses for as long as it takes to drive rivals out of business. China sees renewable energy as its future, so they are investing in their infrastructure by any means necessary. Of course, they can afford to do this.

      Fortunately, a lot of the good energy ideas are still coming out of the US, so we are able to sell technology for the time being.

      • commonsenseobserver

        But actually confronting China on its unfair practices.

        • teaforme2012

          on unfair practices. Actually broke up Standard Oil in 1911, too. But by then, the damage was done. Rockefeller already got wanted he wanted, years before. Total dominance of the market. China has been playing the same game since the late 90s. They are Standard Oil now and the US is a regional mom and pop refinery, praying that the railroads will give them a better deal on shipping rates so they can stay in business another month.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        The kind of policy China has been following can work to create a growing industrial economy from a backward one. But in the long run it is a loser. Japan followed much the same policy for decades and paid a large price.

        The USA still has a large manufacturing sector, we just no longer make textiles, cheap electronics, and low value added consumer goods. And we ought not want to make those things, If you have a comparative advantage in those type products that means you are a poor nation.

        Eventually the Chinese growth will inevitably slow while the people begin to tire of high prices for everything they buy. There will be a lot of unrest, And on top of that they have a demographic catastrophe on their hands, An aging population problem far worse than ours.

        • teaforme2012

          Just not sure I want to be around when that bubble bursts. Talk about too big to fail!

  • bobguzzardi

    Will you be at RedState Gathering, Daniel? Lots of fans would like to meet you I would think.

  • dward

    During a Republican presidential nomination debate, Mitt Romney once famously offered former Republican Presidential candidate Rick Perry a $10,000 bet.

    Now it seems as if Mr. Romney is making another bet: against the better judgment of the American public.

    That?s been made abundantly clear this week as result of a recent Public Opinion Strategies Iowa poll. The poll showed 57% of voters are ?less likely to vote for candidates who do not support expanding wind power generation.? The poll also showed that 59% of independents in particular, the very voters any presidential candidate needs support from for success, believe wind energy has been good for the Hawkeye State?s economy and job production. Indeed, thousands of jobs and billions in investment dollars are at risk if the PTC ends.

    David Ward, American Wind Energy Association

    • commonsenseobserver

      But government interference only stifles it. America’s energy security depends on the ingenuity and innovation of the private sector above the decrees of bureaucrats in Washington.

      Governor Romney is right.

    • tnfriendofcoal101368

      Wind is either competitive in the market place or it is not.

  • Pingback: Website

  • Pingback: Of Course we are a Socialist | TP Energy Blog