« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The First Likely Voter Poll from Fox News Portends Mostly Good News

Earlier this afternoon Fox News posted their first likely voter poll of the campaign, which shows Mitt Romney leading Barack Obama 45%-44%.  Many of us were wondering how the polling would look once the pollsters switch to a likely voter screen – a model which is almost always more favorable to Republicans than a poll of registered voters.  This poll of 1,007 likely voters is a far cry from the last Fox News poll of 930 registered voters, which showed Obama with a 9 point lead.  Obviously, that poll was taken during the nadir of Romney’s campaign and before he got a boost from picking Paul Ryan as his running mate, but clearly the LV model makes a difference.  In this case, it gave Romney a 3-point bump (Obama is up 2 when including RVs).

The likely voter screen was comprised of 42% self-described Democrats 38% Republicans and 18% Independents.  Presumably, this does not reflect the actual affiliation of those surveyed because registered Independents comprise a greater share of the electorate than 18%.  I’m presuming that some of those tallied as Republicans or Democrats are registered Independents who lean decisively in one direction.

Almost every likely voter poll taken until now has shown Romney and Obama deadlocked, even while RV polls were showing Obama with a significant lead.  It will be interesting to see what happens when other RV pollsters switch over to an LV model.

Here are some of the key findings from the Fox News poll juxtaposed to some historical data.  It’s useful to become familiar with these data points as more LV polls begin to surface.

  • Demographics:
    • Party ID: Romney enjoys the support of 92% of Republicans, while Obama garners 88% of the Democrat vote.  Romney is winning the Independent vote 42-32%.  Obama won Independents by 8 points while he won by 5 points overall.
    • Gender: Romney leads Obama 48-40 among men; Obama leads 48-42 among women.
    • Race: Romney leads 53-36% among whites; Obama leads 73-17% among non-whites.  Bush won the white vote by an identical 17-point margin when he won overall by 2.5%.  On the other hand, whites might comprise a slightly smaller percentage of the electorate this year.  Whites accounted for 77% of the electorate in 2004; 74% in 2008.  If Obama has an exceptionally strong showing among Hispanics, Romney might need a few more points from white.
    • Age: Obama is winning the under-35 vote by 50-37; Romney is winning 65+ by 50-41%.  McCain won the over 65 vote by 8, so this is not stellar.  On the other hand, if younger voters turn out in more traditional numbers, Romney won’t need to win more seniors.  Bush only won them by 5%.
    • Marriage: Romney leads 51-38% among married voters.  McCain won the married vote by 5% in 2008; Bush won it by 15% in 2004.  So Romney’s 13-point lead tracks closely with a 50-50 election.
    • Income: Obama is winning those earning under $50k by 53-35 and Romney is winning those earning more than $50k by 50-41.  McCain lost the under 50k vote by 22 points while Bush lost it by 11 points in 2004.
  • Voter intensity: 47% of Democrats polled were “extremely interested” to vote in November, while 59% of Republicans felt the same way.  By far, self-described Tea Partiers were the most interested in voting (71%) of all sub-groups.  Also, only 27% of voters under the age of 35, a critical demographic for Obama, were extremely interested in voting; 58% of those over 65 fit into this category.
  • Approval:
    • Obama job approval: 46% approve and 50% disapprove of Obama’s job performance. The key data point is Independents; Obama is under water at 36-54%.  In terms of approval specifically on the economy, he is under water at 42-54 overall and 35-58 among Independents.  When Bush won reelection narrowly in 2004 his approval stood at 53-46.  His numbers on the economy were 49-51.  If Obama indeed continues to hover around the mid-40s in approval and low-40s on the economy, it’s hard to see how he wins.
    • Trust on jobs and economy: Romney leads by 45-43% on trust on jobs and economy.  He leads 40-30 among Independents.
  • Trust on Medicare: Overall, Obama enjoys only a 3 point lead over Romney in terms of trust on Medicare.  But Romney leads among Independents by 6.  And yes, Paul Ryan’s name is mentioned many times during the survey.  This is pretty dismal for an issue that is supposed to serve as Obama’s trump card.  It looks like Mediscare is headed to the Obamacare death panel.

COMMENTS

  • DerKrieger

    …how the numbers move when Mitt is the official nominee and can start his media blitzkrieg.

    I hope he starts dropping smart bombs on Obama all across the country.

    Nuke Obama with facts and truth.

    How do you like all those violent, war-like references?

  • youngsterz

    Let’s be honest; a substantial percentage of the population doesn’t even think about paying attention to the race until October. Romney knows this, and he will keep up the fight but he will also keep plenty of powder dry (and money to spend) until October.

    I wonder what percentage of the voting eligible population could even identify Romney as the GOP contender? 70%? You know that there is a huge portion of people who just don’t follow politics like your average Red Stater.

    I remain cautiously optimistic for a Romney win. The mere thought of four more years of this disastrous administration is just too awful to contemplate.

    And I WILL be donating additional time and money to the cause, neither of which I really have to spare but the stakes are just way too high to not get involved.

    I want to see a landslide victory and a landslide repudiation of the social experiment of the last four years.

    • proudmarinemom

      and are just returning from Rehobeth, Ocean City, Outer Banks, etc. I’d assume this is the model for most large, coastal cities.

      Everyone I know is busy with back-to-school shopping and packing up their college kids.

      Once the kiddies get into a routine, moms and dads will tune in, log on and wake up. The college kids don’t care about this election — I just did my own non-scientific poll on about a dozen of them. They can’t even tell me when the election will be or who’s running. The recent grads are back home, working part-time at the pizzaria and they’re not happy about it.

      Groceries cost twice what they did four years ago and the packages keep shrinking. A box of cereal is now only half full, at twice the price. Think homemakers don’t notice?

      Looking forward to the Fall.

      • ashland_avenue

        and can report enthusiasm at high levels. Incoming traffic backed up as far as the eye could see. Picnic atmostphere. Tailgaters. All here to root for the team. Quite a few elderly. A motivated crowd.

        Temps were very high. A jovial and upbeat event.

  • throwback59

    among men (8%) than Ronmey has among women (6%).

    Keep something else in mind: there is a percentage of Whites (I’m guessing at least 5%) who will tell a polster that they are undecided, or even voting for Obama rather than risk the follow-up question, “why” if they tell a polster they are supporting Romney. The implication being that support for Romney is racist. Other Romney supporters won’t even bother to speak to a polster, which is why Dems are always a larger percentage of the sample.

  • dbecraft

    I’d guess that the percentage would most likely be 56-41 or close to it. These polls are still taking in a huge Democratic advantage which is ridiculous (except for the MSM).

    At this point in time – Romney would win by a landslide! It should only get better over time…for the Republicans! Really can’t believe that the polls keep trying to keep it close!

    • APA Guy

      Let’s be honest…the 2008 Election really wasn’t a close one. Obama was winning from the moment the economy headed south.

      It behooves the MSM to give the impression of a razor-close election. They all remember how we were glued to our sets in 2000 and would love nothing more than to repeat such an outcome.

      In the end, the voting booth will tell a much different story than these polls. Nearly all of these polls WAY over-sample Dems…and the LV turnout model, if anything close to 2010, is 35/35 Dem/GOP. We have the enthusiasm on our side, they have a president presiding over an economy he has ruined. Even Miss Cleo can see this landslide coming.

  • Tbone

    If this Country goes down the tubes it will because women support Democrats.

    • carolina

      Many of my friends support the dems. Fortunately I also know a fair number of conservative women.
      I followed Jude Wanniski when he was alive – and he taught that we had “the mommy party” and “the daddy party” (just like parents in a family). Sometimes the country needs ‘daddy’ to make the decisions, but other times we need ‘mommy’.
      The current ‘mommy’ has a big credit card problem, so I think its time for ‘daddy’ to take charge!

    • runner12

      there are two primary reasons:

      1). Democrats have used women like they do other minority groups. They claim to have their best interests, but stab them in the back any chance that they get. One just has to read about the hostile work environment for women that has existed in the O adminstration to see that. Despite that, some women keep coming back. It is a vicious cycle.

      2). Democrats play on women’s emotions. Heck, they play on everyone’s emotions. But they specfically play to the motherly, compassionate instincts in women with their social justice memes. Many women get sucked in this way. It has been said the Left uses emotion and the Right reason. As women, too many of us have largely lost our reason in this country and rely too heavily on emotion to make decisions. This is true in politics and in other areas.

      • earlgrey

        emotional aspect vs. intellectual aspect vs. emotional reasoning. Just mentioning the deficit and debt numbers tends to make some women mad. We need to do a better job of telling women how D policies are making their lives worse. Focusing on food prices, higher energy costs and reduced access to health care services might be a good way to go.

        In defense of my gender, I will say that women have played a huge role in the tea party activism and conservative ascendency. At least that’s where I see it.

    • arthurjake

      I always use western Pa as an example. A lot of the people who are conservative in there beliefs can’t force themselves to pull a lever for anything that does not have a D with the name. Its silly and emotional but it goes back to when people in those areas actually had good union jobs in factories and mills and there was such a thing as a blue dog democrat. Now the Unions and there own party screwed screwed them out of those good jobs and there own politicians even insult them directly. Still though they pull that lever for the same people that sell them out and do not in the least represent there ideology.

      • cbartlett

        unfortunately. I am a fourth-generation Texan and I still remember my mom telling me how she and my dad (in their late 70′s now) had to be “closet Republicans” when they first started voting. None of my grandparents would ever consider voting for anyone other than a Democrat because that is just what everyone here always did. My parents were constantly trying to educate them about the screwed up moral values that Democrats supported that directly opposed their very conservative Christian values. Texas is pretty much a Red state now (except for all of those California transplants) but it was a very slow process to get there. Republicans always have the burden of educating voters but it seems like we tend to go about it in an elitist, “over-the-head” kind of way sometimes. We need to simplify the message: Basic facts on every issue – this IS reality – is this really what you want?

  • The_Rebel

    academics Kenneth Bickers and Michael Berry of the University of Colorado, who project that Romney will win 52.9% of the popular vote and 320 electoral votes. They analyze unemployment and per capita income on a state by state basis, and have predicted correctly every presidential election since 1980. Obama gets 47.1%. They only analyze the two major parties. There have been bigger 3rd party candidates in some of those other elections, and they still got it right.

    So polls, schmolls. I’ll go with them. Can’t do better than eight out of eight.

    • APA Guy

      …i.e. polls that WAY over-sample Dems. I suspect that Romney will win by about the same margin Scott Walker won by in his recall election.

  • gflyer3364qt

    Obama:
    California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Maryland, Delaware, Vermont, Rhode Island, Massachussetts, Maine, Connecticut, New Jersey, DC

    Romney: Everything else.

    • gflyer3364qt

      For some reason, I kept going back to that combination when I was fiddling with the electoral map. Anxious to see if I’m right haha.

    • flomflomflooie

      Obama = 256, Romney = 282.

      Toss-Up States (12):

      Romney: MO, FL, NC, VA, WI, NH, NM, IA, CO
      Obama: NV, PA, MI

      In late February 2010, I predicted (and posted on Facebook) my prediction for GOP: House +61, Senate +7. (Actual = House +63, Senate, +5).

      • flomflomflooie

        Obama: OH

        Romney wins White House without Ohio.

  • snappy101

    There’s no way, with the economy this bad that Obama should be so close at this point in time. I wouldn’t be surprised if all of the pollsters have their worst election ever. They are tied. Does no one ever talk about margin of error anymore?

  • Darin_H

    Obama at 44%? NICE! Really, how many of the “undecided” voters are going to see the disaster of the last 4 years and pull the lever fill in the oval for Obama?

    This is before the convention, before Romney’s money assault. No wonder Obama is desperate already.

  • celador2

    Ohio was always Mr Republican and 2008 a fluke. Without Ohio a Republican has a rocky road to win White House. Its the first state I check and the most important. It is also a canary in the mine. Virginia and Florida follow Ohio. But nothing looks good without Ohio.

    Obama won Ohio with 51.4% of the vote and he is in striking distance again. He has a lawsuit to restore early voting days to the 2008 days under the Democrats. He says early voting is a right, a guarantee and Ohio can not allow early voting in person for military without extending that equal time to all.

  • lakeshore

    My apologies if this has been posted before somewhere on the site. I haven’t had time to read everything here lately.

    http://www.colorado.edu/news/releases/2012/08/22/analysis-election-factors-points-romney-win-university-colorado-study-says

  • skorrent1

    Sounds OK to me. Sure, they make up around 30% of adults and RVs, but in August most of them are “ho, hum”. That’s why they’re indies. I would expect the % to rise to 20-25% as they wake up, and if Dem enthusiasm continues to lag.

  • celador2

    The conventions need to draw the public and be able to focus on the message of JOBS NOW. Energy production, less EPA regulation and lower taxes day one.
    Democrats will try to change the subject all through the convention with protesters and Michele on Letterman. Gallup show the typical team ratings bounce is five points. Will Romney-Ryan get that?

  • Coop

    I think Romney/Ryan are well positioned against an incumbent ticket that can’t seem to get out of the mid 40s in match-up polling. And in a few days R&R will be able to unleash massive ad spending. Although with the fairly small number of undecideds, I frankly don’t expect their advertising to move a lot of votes. But I do anticipate it will give the ticket further momentum and stoke even more of a sense of desperation on the left.

    I also expect Romney to post another excellent fundraising month for August. Remember the selection of Paul Ryan generated over $10 million just online alone within a few days. November 6th can’t get here soon enough!

  • http://www.politicalprevarications.com youfamissim

    Notice the two numbers posted only total 89%. That leaves 11% of respondents who refused to answer. The refuse to answer because:
    1. They fear answering I support Mitt Romney will be classified as racists and placed on a punishment list?
    2. They prefer another candidate?
    3. They haven’t made up their minds (See #1)
    4. They are idiots/liars.

    Dick Morris has repeatedly reported those “unaccounted” numbers ALWAYS go to the challengers. ALWAYS! That means this elections will set a new political benchmark – Obama will lose by record numbers. It is likely the Obama campaign’s internal polls show the same thing – Obama losing by 10% 59-40%. Remarkably – these numbers gibe with the number of unemployed – 20 million, those likely to become unemployed if Obama wins a second term 10 million (healthcare and coal plant workers). Gee, it’s funny how those numbers add up.

  • Pingback: Announcing Your Pregnancy

  • Pingback: weiterlesen

  • Pingback: Renetta Servidio

  • Pingback: Claud Sabino

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: maid service business

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: moved here

  • Pingback: noclegi zakopane

  • Pingback: HGH Advanced reviews

  • Pingback: distilling vodka

  • Pingback: skype

  • Pingback: Portal randkowy

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: Wedding fashion

  • Pingback: camping

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes bautizo

  • Pingback: Male Extra scam

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: Links Eintragen

  • Pingback: Egal Gabbay California

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: helpful source

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis ipad 2

  • Pingback: BBCAT

  • Pingback: click reference

  • Pingback: ps3

  • Pingback: chapter 13 bankruptcy

  • Pingback: lacna kozmetika

  • Pingback: Source

  • Pingback: homebrew

  • Pingback: Aquaristik Bücher

  • Pingback: new york asian escorts

  • Pingback: dallas recaning service

  • Pingback: moved right here

  • Pingback: Amal Noth

  • Pingback: Logan Eidem

  • Pingback: mira esto

  • Pingback: finish repair

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: คอนโดเอแบคบางนา

  • Pingback: an overall total noob

  • Pingback: Lewis Filzen

  • Pingback: Refugio Latif

  • Pingback: how to install 5 1/4 crown molding in kissimmee

  • Pingback: Jeremiah Roa

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: Aquariumfilter

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: Jose Krul

  • Pingback: Mikel Asplin

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: PPT

  • Pingback: razorback football camp

  • Pingback: payment gateway account

  • Pingback: Elinore Reddicks

  • Pingback: survey questions My SurveyExpert

  • Pingback: How To Delete Explore Talent Profile

  • Pingback: mobile device marketing app

  • Pingback: proaupair.com

  • Pingback: nfl helmet stickers

  • Pingback: Odell Sanfiorenzo

  • Pingback: scrapebox error 403

  • Pingback: buy edu links

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: http://www.streamdownload.net/portfolio/download-mtv-music-on-windows

  • Pingback: repair

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: Arkadas Bul

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: College

  • Pingback: e-cigarettes

  • Pingback: sent straight here

  • Pingback: cash advance payday loans

  • Pingback: Best Teeth Whitening Products

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: casino gaming

  • Pingback: this

  • Pingback: Pauline Holt

  • Pingback: Laraine Moncrieffe

  • Pingback: Norbert Kratt

  • Pingback: dry cleaners

  • Pingback: Jenifer Wesselhoft

  • Pingback: wealth through internet marketing

  • Pingback: sent here

  • Pingback: Nathan Eitzen

  • Pingback: Mitchel Lyau

  • Pingback: wedding planner italy

  • Pingback: Augustus Standfield

  • Pingback: ipl Laser Hair Removal Kensington

  • Pingback: Upgrade

  • Pingback: accepted statement

  • Pingback: Byron

  • Pingback: Bari

  • Pingback: Delano

  • Pingback: Raina Hektner

  • Pingback: Lakeshia Crutch

  • Pingback: Suzette Krawczyk

  • Pingback: this I regarded

  • Pingback: Belk

  • Pingback: Ashly Saysithideth

  • Pingback: Patrina Locklier

  • Pingback: test

  • Pingback: Zachery Tesar

  • Pingback: alfileres de boda

  • Pingback: Ronald Josten

  • Pingback: Trudy Tieng

  • Pingback: Christoper Gordan

  • Pingback: Renato Gilger

  • Pingback: Diseño web barato

  • Pingback: Marty Nobis

  • Pingback: Amos Fraschilla

  • Pingback: Ezequiel Aloe

  • Pingback: Coretta Barlow

  • Pingback: Delano

  • Pingback: Dominick Lipphardt

  • Pingback: Dorotha Bookard

  • Pingback: hot local sex dates

  • Pingback: aqui

  • Pingback: Delmar

  • Pingback: Donatien

  • Pingback: Peter Rasnick

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Jc Rutledge

  • Pingback: vegas bankruptcy lawyer

  • Pingback: Irena Griggers

  • Pingback: หอพักโชคชัย 4

  • Pingback: Francisco Silveria

  • Pingback: honda crv

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: texas driver education

  • Pingback: Inger Rodell

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Lacy

  • Pingback: Diamanta

  • Pingback: Byron

  • Pingback: Donatien

  • Pingback: Kasandra Sera

  • Pingback: Leticia Delmont

  • Pingback: koi

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu