COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • izoneguy

    Regardless – labels or no labels they are idiots

    • http://www.tobytoons.com TobyToons

      That is one direction I could’ve gone with this cartoon… having them all stand around holding label guns ready to apply labels to everyone else. “If you label us, we are going to label you a trouble-maker.”

      They are just trying to distance themselves from all the labels that they tried in the past and lost with in the midterms.

  • earlgrey

    It worked for him, but unfortunately thousands are waking up to the subterfuge and aren’t going to let these guys get away without revealing who they are.

  • johnt

    A cousin to No Labels and for the same purpose.
    Also, have to snicker at the NY Times kissing send off to David Brock’s latest hustle. Gee whiz, a brand new blog and fund raiser for the impoverished and voiceless left. Poor babies lost out there in the wilderness, fighting the Republican Machine.
    Odd, but the same names, same donors, and same leftist drivel.

  • chihank

    Mike Castle has decided to join the NO LABELS group. Christie O’Donnell have been a bad canddiate, but I’d rather have the “Bearded Marxist” Coons than “No Labels” Castle.

    • wonkish1

      That Presumes That All That Matters

      Is the expected GOP floor votes on issues. If that was true I think many would agree, but it is so far from true its ridiculous. The fact is like everybody else on here understands, one liberal GOP senator siding with the Dems on an issue can
      A) give cover to 5 Dems that would otherwise feel like they are on the hot seat in regards to deciding whether or not to vote for something
      B) Signal to independents that Dem and RINO agreement is where the center is on issues causing lasting damage to conservative priorities
      C) Can cause us to lose media fights over a piece of legislation
      D) Can cause independent and moderate voters that tend to vote for the GOP to move to left on particular issues
      E) Can dishearten elements of the conservative base effecting outcomes of future elections of GOP elected officials(such as other GOP senators)

      The list goes on an on. The fact is that someone that votes 50% with us and 50% against us does a lot more damage to the issues he or she votes against us on then he provides in benefit to the issues he votes with us on.

    • wonkish1

      I thought you were saying the opposite.

      Forget my post.