« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Jane Norton Takes From Charlie Crist’s Playbook & Broadcasts She’s Soft on Immigration

There is an Associated Press article out about Ken Buck’s surge in Colorado.

For those of us who know Ken Buck, this quote comes as no surprise:

Buck was asked directly whether his upstart campaign would really work. He summed up why so many conservatives like him — and why so many political observers wonder how far he can go.

“I don’t know that I can win,” Buck said. “But I am what I am.”

The man is the most non-politician politician I’ve ever met. He isn’t pretentious and he isn’t overly political. He’s just honest and refreshing. Were he more of a politician, he probably would not have said that, but it has opened the door for Jane Norton.

Unfortunately for Norton, she’s pulled a talking point right out of Charlie Crist’s playbook:

“I can actually beat Michael Bennet. There’s an electability factor,” Norton told about 30 Republicans at a McDonald’s in eastern Colorado last month.

Electability? That’s what Charlie Crist said for a year — “Rubio can’t win the general election, so vote for me.” It won’t work for Norton any more than it will work for Crist.

This is not to say, however, that Norton is horrible like Crist. She’s not. But she is falling back on the same talking point. What’s more, she’s also signaling that she’ll capitulate on comprehensive immigration reform.

Norton, I’m told, is telling Republican business leaders in Colorado that they should support her because she won’t deport their workers. She dropped a hint of this in her attack on Buck’s answer.

Not all Colorado Republicans are sold. Many fear that Buck’s too conservative to be elected statewide and that his background as a tough-on-immigrants prosecutor will turn off Latino voters in a state where more than a fifth of residents are Hispanic.

“I can actually beat Michael Bennet. There’s an electability factor,” Norton told about 30 Republicans at a McDonald’s in eastern Colorado last month. “I can reach out to Hispanics, to women, to young people.

Why does she say that? Because Ken Buck opposes amnesty and wants to enforce our immigration laws. Norton wants a path to citizenship. This is, I think, the first time she’s been willing to admit it, however indirectly.

COMMENTS

  • RINKER

    Where did she say she supports “comprehensive” immigration reform? Did I miss a quote?

  • The_Gadfly

    He didn’t say what you are claiming he said. He said she is soft on it. You judge a politician by the company she keeps. She likes John McCain (the original McShamnesty proponent) and shuns DeMint and Tancredo.

  • The_Gadfly

    The first candidate to invoke “electability” is immediately disqualified from seeking office.

  • RINKER

    Where did she say she was “soft on immigration”? It could be that she would vote the exact same was as Ken Buck. I just haven’t seen a dime’s worth of difference between the two….

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    It is descriptive, not proscriptive.

    And yes, I would agree that as a contested primary goes on, the probability that a candidate’s supporters will mention electability approaches one.

  • PurpleWombats

    The title says she’s “broadcasting” her alleged softness on the border, the actual post said she just dropped a “hint.” I think the second word is far more appropriate.

    Saying she can gain votes from Hispanics does not make her pro-amnesty any more than saying she can gain votes from women makes her pro-abortion. Ken Buck seems to have a reputation as a prosecutor who pursues illegals. Merely on a level of messaging, Norton will be more appealing to Hispanics. But that doesn’t tell us anything. A racist who screeches about deporting them all is less savory than someone who quietly insists that we defend the border (these examples are obviously hypothetical – I’m not accusing Buck OR Norton of anything).

    If Norton has actually been promising business owners to allow their illegal workers to stay in the US, then we know something. But from this “hint,” I really don’t think we gain much at all.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    You can’t say Jane Norton is like Charlie Crist, and then says she isn’t. You can’t say from her quote that she’s “for a path to citizenship”. This is from her campaign website:

    I believe that we must secure our borders and end illegal immigration. And because we are a nation that relies on the rule of law, I steadfastly oppose amnesty for those illegal immigrants already in our country.

    I’m quite sure you knew where to find this information. That you’ve misrepresented her position this much is a real concern. That Ken Buck says he isn’t sure he can win is also a big concern. It would seem he’s making his opposition’s campaign commercials for them.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Seriously? DeMint has come out in support of Buck. Why would she have anything to do with him?

    And Tancredo? That guy is like poison to politicians here in Colorado. I’d shun him too.

    And company she keeps? You realize there’s a family tie, right? No, probably not. That would upset the narrative.

  • aesthete

    poll better with Hispanics than other Republicans. Even more indicting (to some), he has actively courted Hispanics in their news venues (Telemundo and others). Does that mean that he is even more soft on immigration than Norton? I don’t have a horse in the race, but is it really surprising that, in a meeting about electibility, Norton would point out groups that she believes she would do better with than Buck? I think it’s wrong to latch on to a descriptive statement (I can reach out to Hispanics, young people) and attempt to make it a proscriptive statement (I am more likely to support comprehensive immigration reform).

  • val1198

    I am glad that Erick is onto Norton. She’s pretty slick.

    Before long, Norton will be showing pictures of her, Rubio and Toomey. She will want you to think she’s one of them.

    Truth is, she is a principal with a PAC called “Conservative Joint Victory Fund 2010.” That PAC threw her a big party so she could get some pictures taken with a couple of real conservatives.

    Note: Jane Norton is not endorsed by Sen Jim DeMint or the Senate Conservatives Fund. She couldn’t be; she joined with Democrats and liberal Republicans to support the biggest tax increase in Colorado history.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    They came out to campaign for her. Apparently they think she’s one of them or they wouldn’t have been there with her.

  • val1198

    Norton’s DC lobby can do a lot of things, including pulling in conservatives to make her look good. Money talks.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    So when a conservative campaigns for someone you don’t like, it’s all about money. When they campaign for someone you do like, it’s all about principle. Funny how that works.

  • val1198

    is twisting.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    …Rubio and Toomey can be bought. Now that would be twisting.

  • Michael Dugas

    I know here in Fla there are a lot of legal immigrants who are upset and worried about jobs and the economy and feel they will lose out on both if illegals are allowed to stay working cheap and under the table.