« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Collecting scalps at what cost?

I’m torn on saying anything about this, but think the better part of valor requires me to speak up on this.

The Shirley Sherrod debate reminds me of Rush Limbaugh trying to buy the St. Louis Rams. For three days after the announcement reporters, news anchors, “legitimate” “journalists” brought up several Limbaugh quotes that painted him as a racist. For three days these “legitimate” people in the news — not pundits, not analysis, but news anchors, reporters, etc. — pressed on until the deal was successful sabotaged. Only then did reporters care to point out that after twenty years on the radio, all the quotes used to bash Rush Limbaugh had been fabricated by the left.

Then there were the fabricated incidents during the health care protests in Washington where tea party activists allegedly spit on black members of Congress and used the “N” word. None of that actually happened.

Andrew Breitbart promised he would do to the left what the left has been doing to the right for years. He is gathering quite the collection of leftwing scalps and will forever warm the hearts of the right for the ACORN takedown alone. I’m glad he is on our side.

That said, I think Shirley Sherrod has been unfairly characterized as a racist.

In the Breitbart video, we hear Ms. Sherrod discuss meeting with a white farmer who clearly wanted to make sure she knew he was superior to her. And we hear her say she decided she’d help, but only do so much. And we clearly hear her say she decided to send him to his own kind — a white lawyer.

What we only start to hear before the video ends and where the conversation goes is Ms. Sherrod realizing the issue was not black vs. white, but a matter of the poor.

In fact, Ms. Sherrod and the white farmer are now friends. The farmer and his wife are defending Ms. Sherrod for saving their family farm. It seems the video cuts out as Ms. Sherrod is about to make a profound point — the dynamics of black versus white have changed in the South.

As a local city councilman in Macon, Georgia, I deal with this all the time — both among white people and black people. After decades of racial disharmony, people are realizing there is more to each other than skin color, however hard it may be to see past that.

We’re making progress.

There will always be racists because there will always be sinners. We, all of us like sheep, have gone astray. Maybe Shirley Sherrod is. But it seems in the video clip presented Ms. Sherrod was penitent and recognized that her initial impressions were wrong. That does not give her a pass in life. There are still questions about her.

But in this instance, if this is all there is and it seems it may be all we have to examine, we shouldn’t be collecting her scalp. We should be hopeful for more people willing to realize the world does not revolve around race.

What is, however, disturbing is the White House. It has kept Kevin Jennings on the payroll despite his sordid past, hatred of the scouts, and advocacy of a radical gay rights agenda. The White House was perfectly happy to keep Van Jones around for a good while. The White House is perfectly happy to use a congressional recess to put Donald Berwick in charge of Medicare. But a low level Ag Department employee? She had to be tossed. So much for loyalty.

If there is nothing more to Ms. Sherrod’s remarks, I think we’ve made a mistake. But above all else, it is hilarious to watch the White House scrambling out of fear for Andrew Breitbart and the new propensity on the right to fight back in the same way and with the same tactics the left has used for so long.

And that is a point we need to make and is quite relevant and should not be missed by people wringing their hands over this on either side.

The left has used race as a weapon for a very long time. They have devalued what racism means – which is a terrible shame if you actually care about stopping real racism or remembering it in our history. The word now connotes disagreeing with the left instead of what it actually means.

Had Ms. Sherrod been white, she’d be vilified in the press, fired, and probably have trouble thereafter seeking work. The NAACP would be passing a resolution condemning the Department of Agriculture as racist. This is what we have become in politics because of the unrepentant race-baiting on the left. It has become a tit for tat war of retribution.

We see that on the Journolist as reported by the Daily Caller today. When Jeremiah Wright was in the news, the leftwing reporters on Journolist plotted to change the subject by declaring various figures in and around the Bush White House, including Karl Rove on the inside and Fred Barnes on the outside, “racist.” They wanted to scream racism not because the people to be attacked were in fact racist, but because it would be a useful way to change the subject.

That war has casualties on both sides. Ms. Sherrod is the latest. It is not fair. But that’s how the left plays and the right must fight on offense or not fight at all. It disgusts me to have to say it, but that is so very sadly where we are. As long as the left gets a pass on this all too easy game, the right has to fight back.

COMMENTS

  • David123
  • dwintnf

    Erick. I am glad that this is being discussed.

    I guess you are not a coward. Let’s get in touch with AG Holder

    and ask him if we’re still cowards…The truth WILL set all of us free…

    We are all one.

  • http://www.neoavatara.com/blog neoavatara

    I know the left loves throwing race bombs…but we should be better. This woman, when you look at the entire piece, was taken out of context. It isn’t fair, left or right.

  • NHConservative0227

    For writing an excellent piece. When I first heard the tape played on Beck, O’Reilly, and Hannity last night I thought it was a clear-cut case that Ms.Sherrod was a racist who deserved to be fired.

    However, it was not until this afternoon when FoxNews played the entire part where Ms. Sherrod goes on to say it was not a matter of black/white but a matter of being poor. I said to my wife after hearing that that I didn’t think she deserved to be fired for this.

    Thank you for being fair and reporting on the whole story. Make no mistake, I am a very strong conservative (as my handle suggests) who thinks that the Left has played the racism game for far too long. But all of us on the right need to portray the whole story and not try to slant things in any way. Honestly, the way it was played on Beck, Hannity, and O’Reilly was pretty misleading.

    This is one of the main reasons I come to this site on a daily basis, you are the best writer on this site.

  • erp617

    Maybe she was fired because the White House didn’t want this fascinating information to be made public.

  • rdelbov

    you are a big man on this issue.

    I see some thing changing on other fronts.

    30 years ago Black conservatives were viewed with caution.

    Not now.

    I hope we will truely be at the point of judging people by the content of their charactor and not the colour of their skin.

    Perhaps a man like Tim Scott or Bobby Jindal could be President one day

  • NeoKong

    but I disagree.

    I saw the video and she clearly spoke about helping that white farmer as if it was some sort of moral dilemma to her.
    As far as the white farmer trying to show his superiority that is her opinion only.
    What was the man doing….?
    Mocking her skin color while he was asking for help ?
    Did he say to her “Listen you govt. hack…you work for me”.
    Whether or not he was rude to her is irrelevent.
    She clearly said she held back on what she could do for him based on his skin color to the delight of her audience.

    The left has set the rules as far as racism goes and for once they have to live by them.
    They stuck it to Rush.
    They stuck it to George Allen.
    They stuck it to Trent Lott.
    Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Chris Matthews have skated on comments that were far worse than “macacca” or a birthday salutation and no one cared.
    Don’t even get me started on the New Black Panthers.
    Let’s be blunt. No one on the left really has a problem with what Sherrod has said.
    They are sacrificing her for the greater good of their well coordinated Axel/corrupt media journolist smear campaign against the Tea Party.
    She is a distraction to the campaign.
    It’s the Tea Party who is racist and that theme must not be knocked off track.
    She will lay low for a while and when it is safe they will find her a new job just like they did with Van Jones.

    Sorry Erick but I want that scalp.

  • http://UnitedConservativesofVirginia Cargosquid

    give her side of the story.

  • Waderic

    Beck didnt play it last night… infact, he opened with it tonight, saying basically the same thing as Erick.

  • eastbaylarry

    …there are a *lot* of real targets out there. He doesn’t need to snip little phrases to find real racism.

  • eastbaylarry

    …there are a *lot* of real targets out there. He doesn’t need to snip little phrases to find real racism.

  • NHConservative0227

    I watched Beck last night but haven’t had a chance to watch it off the DVR yet tonight.

    That’s why Beck has always been one of the fairest and most respected guys in the business.

    Let’s see if Hannity does the same tonight, didnt’ hear him play the whole thing today.

  • DCVaHi

    I think it?s altogether possible that Breitbart might have been had by a leftwing operative. After all, her comments were made at an NAACP meeting. Who in that meeting is likely to leak a damaging recording to Breitbart? The plan may have been to only leak the first part, let the VRWC go nuts screaming ?racism? then let the rest of the story come out showing that she had seen the error of her ways, thus making the response of the right look foolish. But the operative leaker underestimated the speed with which this administration (and the NAACP) would throw its own employee under the bus ? thus looking foolish themselves.

  • renny

    To shift attention from o’s associates during the campaign in 2008, “regular” MAINSTEAM journalists (like those ethical struggling young scientists in the climate field who only wanted to keep the science pure) banded together to label a Rove or a Cheney or any one else in the last administration as “racists”–MERELY to deflect legitimate questions on Obama’s background and associates.

    The same slander is being tried out by the NAACP against the tea parties, forgetting to their idiocy, the there is no ONE tea party, and our strength is in real diversity and grass roots activism.

    Should we not also jump in to label “racist” actions we find disturbing? We should label where appropriate, but no one should tar and feather any other person without cause.

    When I saw the video of the former Ag Dept. adviser, her remarks seemed reverse racism to me, but like the Rodney King video that excerpted a few seconds and never showed the entire encounter recorded between Mr. King and the police, the piece originally posted did not convey the woman’s full story.

    I make my apologies here for jumping too quickly to conclusions, but my reaction was keyed up by the ludicrous NAACP slur against tea parties.

  • Richard Mullins

    Sherry Mugabe(err Sherrod) sends people to lawyers of their “kind”. So, I’m suppose to find a lawyer of my kind now, right Ms. Mugabe(I mean Sherrod). Think that telling anyone something like this, is in itself, the same as person saying that they are “superior” . Nether person is justified in what they say.

  • mindymc73

    According to the last line of this report: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/usda-official-fired-admitting-past-incident-racism
    Just FYI

    As to your thoughts, I agree.

  • izoneguy

    Something stinks over at the USDA.

    Shirley Sherrod could have kept the gravy train going for those black farmers claiming discrimination. Shirley Sherrod is like the band-aid covering a gaping wound. The band-aid has been ripped off and the USDA wants to throw it out and bury it.

    There could be fraud going back for decades. This could be even bigger than ACORN.

  • http://www.thehayride.com MacAoidh

    …because I want him carrying them around as albatrosses.

    That said, Breitbart’s original piece with Sherrod’s video actually had TWO clips to it, and Breitbart took pains to highlight the fact that it was the SECOND clip which was important rather than the first (which has gotten all the attention to date).

    This is the second clip, and it’s the reason why Sherrod has no business working for the federal government…

  • Scope

    It seems that you have not seen the video beyond her opening remarks, that set up her story. Further video shows that she was setting up a racists story, only to come back and say that she had a pivot point, as Beck would call it, and, realized it isn’t about black and white, it is about the poor. There is no more tape available at this time, I wonder why. Why is the biggest question. We don’t know what she said beyond that. Isn’t it interesting to you at all that the tape was cut, almost as soon as she started talking about the fact that it isn’t a black and white thing? Surely you missed the story that goes beyond the MSM version. Thank you God, Fox has captured at least a little more of the sppech, that puts the MSM to shame.

    It is the O’s goal, as well as the NAACP to divide the blacks and whites. As soon as Ms. Shrrod crossed that line, and made it not a black and white story, she had to be eliminated, or politically assisnated, as Beck would say. At that NAACP meeting, they called the Tea Parties racists. How dare she not follow the playbook? Hello, Ms. Shrrod, the WH wants you to resign, no reason, no explanation, just resign, because you are going on Glenn Beck tonight.

    Thank you Glenn Beck for standing up for what is correct and right. The lady should not have lost her job. Period, end of story. She just happened to make the mistake of not supporting the goal of it’s a black and white thing.

    I really hope that you just haven’t read, heard or seen the whole story.

  • NeoKong

    “His own kind”

    Let’s play a fun game and use that phrase in other contexts shall we…?

    “You want to rent an apartment from me ?
    Why don’t you just go and rent from your own kind

    You want to eat in my restaurant?
    Why don’t you go to a restaurant run by your own kind?”

    You say you want your kids to go to this school….?
    Why don’t you send them to school with your own kind ?”

    Are you sure you want to stay in our hotel….?
    Wouldn’t you be more comfortable staying with your own kind ?”

    Hmmm…nothing racist about that now was there ?

    While I am glad the woman got fired because she deserved it we now have to consider the implications of that firing.

    The lefties now hold the moral high ground.

    “Hey…we fired one of our own kind because of racism but you guys still have that racist Tea Party guy.
    Aren’t you going to fire him like WE DID when we were confronted by blatant racism….?”

    This was nothing more than sacrificing a pawn just like they did with Congress for Obamacare.
    The payoff is later.
    Now they can throw it back in our face every chance they get.
    And you know they will.

    If Sherrod had to go then why doesn’t (insert racist conservative here) have to go?
    Her name will definitely come up again in that context and I give it maybe a week or less. Probably MSNBC.

  • kenjames

    are not free to talk about their true feelings in the presence of other blacks. I have observed this time and time again among the many blacks I have worked with. They are ostracized if they become “too white”. They have to pretend, as Mrs. Sherrod seems to be doing, to show that she is just as black as they are. God forbid other blacks know she actually helped white people willingly! The truth seems to be she went way beyond the call of duty to help, but doesn’t want the audience to know that. That is what the problem is in our society. Black people have a problem with each other more than they do with whites. They act a part day in and day out. When we start talking about each other as people and not with black and white qualifiers, only then will we have arrived. That day is many, many years away.

  • NeoKong

    The clip was almost three minutes long.
    I understood her words.

  • Tbone

    No slack, no quarter. No benefit of the doubt. ;-)

  • longwalker

    and I dispise their tactics. I agree with Eric, Shirley Sherro, in that first clip, wasthe victim of a “drive-by shooting.” The full clip shows a person who, at least on the issue of color, had a little road to Damascus experience. Thelast clip shows that she is a goodDemocrat. When, in my mispent youth, I worked for Boss Buckley’s Bronx Democrtatic machine, I understood the first rule – no matter the issues – the important thing was jobs for the party bosses to dispense.

  • Scope

    the Black Panther story has been covered very well by the more right leaning talk radio, and tv personalities. It takes chipping away from one little story to the next to prove the point. They all add up.

    I am very proud of Beck for playing the part of her speech that was not played in the initial clips. It was Breitbart that found the further tape. Not to take advantage of a situation, but, to point out how anyone those that don’t toe the Liberal line eliminated, is very big. We keep pointing out to the Black population how they are being used by the O and his progressives. We need to keep driving that fact home until the Black population realizes they are being played by the left. If we keep doing this one baby step at a time, we can win the black population. They don’t need to be kept as slaves to the Progressives, and, either do any of us.

  • Born Again Capitalist
  • jisaacconnett

    One of the truths this scandal should teach is that we are now involved in a political war, and the future of our nation is at stake. Wars are, by nature, rather nasty, and some casualties will be part of the fall-out.

    The racism smear has long been a favorite tactic of the left wing, and it has historically been used very successfully to silence Republicans and other conservatives. Now, Breitbart has demonstrated that the same tactic can be used against the left. So far, so good. It reminds me of Lee Atwater. The Democrats hated him because he was very creative and knew how to use pithy statements to denigrate his opposition. What the left really hated was Atwater’s success using the tactics so often used against Republicans.

    In this current phase of political war, we need more Lee Atwaters, such as Breitbart. We need to show the left that if they smear us, we can make like the wicked witch of the west and fly around throwing crapola all over them too. Every time they try to smear one of our people, instead of joining in and doing the job for them, we should be right back in their face and punish them with all the fury we can muster.

  • clement

    Not only were some of the phrases she used toxic in ANY context, as far as I’m concerned there is no proof the Spooner’s are the specific ‘white farmer’ she was talking about. Even if that is the case it just reeks of ‘I have white friends so I’m not racist’. (Seriously, if I said similar things about people of color (I never would) and then I brought in one of my black friends do you think anyone would come to my defense?)

  • clintonformccain

    Obama’s campaign chair says I’m a racist just like Bill Clinton. DNC memeber Donna Brazille says that the Democrat Party no longer needs white folk like me. So as far as I’m concerned, Shirley Sherrod and the Obama regime can work out their issues themselves. Don’t look to me to defend Shirley Sherrod against the Obama okie doke.What do I know? I’m a racist because I didn’t vote for Obama.

  • izoneguy

    http://www.walb.com/Global/story.asp?S=10349434

    Black Farmers filed the Pigford Class Action Lawsuit in 1997 against the USDA for discrimination in loan practices. Now advocates say the Obama settlement offer is good news, but still not enough money to make up for what it cost.

    “One point 25 billion is not enough,” said Shirley Sherrod Georgia Director of the Federation of Southern Cooperatives. “So now we’re scrambling to see what we are going to do.”

    In 2008′s Farm Bill the offer was $100 million. Secretary of Agriculture Thomas Vilsack says he wants to correct past errors by the USDA and move forward with a new civil rights program.

    Obama Giving Black Farmers $1.25B in Reparations

    http://newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-reparations-black-farmers/2010/02/21/id/350458

    Black farmers ? possibly over 70,000 of them ? will get cash payments and debt relief from the federal government totaling $1.25 billion, in reparation for alleged racial discrimination suffered under the Department of Agriculture?s loan programs, the Obama Administration has agreed.

    Another estimate from a 1990s Harper?s magazine article calculated that reparations would cost $97 trillion ? based on 222,505,049 hours of forced labor between 1619 and 1865, plus 6% compounded interest.

    Pointing to ?the staggering breadth of America?s crime against us,? TransAfrica founder Randall Robinson in his book, ?The Debt: What America Owes to Blacks,? argued that ?Solutions must be tailored to the scope of the crime in a way that would make the victim whole. In this case, the psychic and economic injury is enormous, multidimensional and long-running. Thus must be America?s restitution to blacks for the damage done.?

    According to the reparations mindset, therefore, President Obama?s $1.25 billion for 70,000-plus black farmers is hardly even a beginning.

    Farmer Reparations

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26319

    At issue is almost a billion dollars paid out by the Department of Agriculture (USDA) for alleged racial discrimination by local offices administering farm loans under the Farm Service Agency. Dan Glickman, Bill Clinton?s Secretary of Agriculture, following public complaints and even a White House demonstration by African American farmers in the 1990?s confessed the USDA?s guilt. He declared in a 1997 publication of the USDA news that local officials had ?discriminated against some of the very people we were meant to help.?

    What followed was a class action lawsuit (originally named Pigford v. Glickman) and a settlement by the Clinton administration in 1999. The consent decree which ended the lawsuit provided that farmers who had suffered discrimination could come forward to present claims and receive compensation.

    However, the seeds of a vast scam were sown: with only a simple affidavit signed by someone who alleged he had applied for a loan or merely that he had ?attempted to own or lease farm land,? $50,000 (tax free no less) would be paid out. Upon a slightly greater showing of proof (?a preponderance of the evidence?) even more money could be claimed.

    Claimants did not need to prove that they ever actually farmed — or ever applied for a loan, only that they ?attempted to farm? explains USDA?s General Counsel Marc Kesselman. Could someone sitting on their couch get money by saying they thought about farming in the 1990?s? Kesselman says that ?folks have to sign an affidavit with sufficient detail? to describe how they attempted to farm. Well, people wouldn?t lie, would they?

    What happened next was an extraordinary example of fraud on a massive scale. The USDA did its job under the consent decree. It provided notice to potential claimants and took steps to advertise the class settlement. Nearly a half a million dollars was spent to advertise on cable TV and in newspapers, with special attention to African American press.

    “One point 25 billion is not enough,” said Shirley Sherrod Georgia Director of the Federation of Southern Cooperatives. “So now we’re scrambling to see what we are going to do.”

    After the initial time period for the settlement ran out in October 1999 the consent decree provided for another period of eleven months whereby claimants upon ?extraordinary circumstances? could still file claims. More than 65,000 additional claimants stepped forward to file claim requests. Another 8000 then came forward with their late claims. (So in a universe of 18,500 farmers in 1997, 96,000 individuals managed to make claims.) But there had been a court-imposed deadline. Wasn?t this the end of the road? Not by a long shot.

    “One point 25 billion is not enough,” said Shirley Sherrod Georgia Director of the Federation of Southern Cooperatives. “So now we’re scrambling to see what we are going to do.”

    Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) is one of the few legislators who has attempted to question this boondoggle. He terms this a case of ?significant fraud.? King contends that at least 75% of the claims are fraudulent, the work of plaintiff?s counsel and activists who spread the word in African American communities that individuals, many of whom had never even farmed, were entitled to these monies. Asked if any of his colleagues seem inclined to rock the boat and challenge this give away, he says bluntly, ?No.?

    Although the evidence is plain, the fear of being labeled as ?insensitive? or ?opposing civil rights remedies? has kept most every legislator from stepping forward to challenge the gravy train of cash give away. After all, it?s only your money.

    “One point 25 billion is not enough,” said Shirley Sherrod.

  • crazynorm

    While it is early in the cycle, there are bits coming out they may show the lady had (HAD) some issues and seen the light. Were not perfect, but when we take the high road, it makes the world a better place. If she was wronged, then we speak up for her and defend her.

    I still have issues with the CNA rally, what happen there was a pure display of two evil men. The main character and the one were not sure of yet! Those who listen to the tape when the unidentified man talks about “Why you shaking, we need to get you some?” and then attacks him. Listen to his voice, you can hear the joy in his voice, knowing he’s about to strike. That’s the one we need to IDENTIFY!

    Again nice piece and let’s do the right thing, for the right reason.

  • NeoKong

    [as far as I?m concerned there is no proof the Spooner?s are the specific ?white farmer? she was talking about.]

    How do we know who she was talking about ?

  • Blueblood

    Just for the record, in the video she states, “because chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted”, this places the story in the 1986-1987 time range.

  • DirtyDave

    The other half is the audience’s reaction. They were not shocked or offended by her remarks. They seemed to like them and favor what she said and did.

  • jisaacconnett

    Several of my relative have or still do work for the USDA in other states. One of those has related to me the fact that he only works perhaps one and a half to two hours per day during an eight hour day. His job is not all that necessary, and the office could well do without him, but they do not eliminate his position because, at least in part, because if they did they might well lose part of their annual funding for the location.

    This is a common situation in U.S. Government agencies. Years ago, I was responsible for securing certain supplies for a military operation, and I was regularly instructed to spend all my annual budget, whether or not I needed to, because if I did not do so, the next year I might not get as many dollars alloted for my needs. I regularly complied.

  • Scope

    that definately puts a whole different slant on the Shirely Sherrod story. No wonder she has refused coming on all of the Fox shows, she knows that sooner or later, this info will most likely come out.

    Sorry to NeoCong above.

  • smagar

    Or, so Ed Morrissey said today on Hugh Hewitt’s show.

    Now, will the MSM point that out. Or, will they let the NAACP’s condemnation of Breitbart and Fox News go uncritiqued.

  • avgjo

    what she said.

    (starts around 1:50)

    That’s when it was revealed to me that it’s about poor
    versus those who have. It is not so much about white…
    It IS about white and black but it’s not you know..it opened my eyes.

    This is the ‘context’ out of which Sherrod claims her previous remarks were taken. Read them carefully.

    NOT SO MUCH about white… it IS ABOUT WHITE AND BLACK…

    Does that sound like someone who repented (i.e. changed their ways) about racism?

    Imagine a white Republican saying this after admitting that years before he had denied a black man help because of race. Beck sure as heck wouldn’t be defending the guy on t.v. like he was Sherrod today and rightfully so. So why is he saying that she should not have been fired?

    No, no defense, she hasn’t changed. She’s playing CYA now. That’s it.

    As for Breitbart, God bless him. Perfect timing. Collect as many scalps as possible. He exposed her racism (as someone getting recognition from the NAACP) and that of the audience at the NAACP event. He exposed last week’s hypocrisy.

    Worrying about being the ‘bigger man’ in our struggle with the Statist vermin will get us and our nation killed. I suspect that Beck’s (and others’) defense of this woman is, partly, in response to last week’s events; they don’t want to feed into the narrative that conservatives are racist, and what better way to prove it than to defend a minority enemy? Indeed, Beck seems to have taken exactly this into consideration today; he homed right in on the comment that supposedly came from the W.H. that Sherrod would be on his show that night.

    I hope to see much more of this as the days and months pass. Breitbart has shown us a very important tactic necessary to defeating these people.

  • SirGladiator

    We don’t have any evidence that this farmer was actually ‘trying to make himself look superior’ to this woman, but we do have evidence that she didn’t help him as much as she was capable of, because she admitted it. Also, saying that she brought him to one of ‘his own kind’, a white lawyer, is just hilariously obvious racism. There is no defense to that, he isn’t ‘one of his own kind’ because he’s white, thats racist crazy talk. That woman isn’t ‘one of my own kind’ if Im black, any more than that farmer is ‘one of my own kind’ if Im white. We’re individuals, we’re Americans, we aren’t a ‘kind’ based on our race. The woman is a racist, she was rightly dismissed. I applaud Erick for bending over backward trying to see the best in people, but there’s nothing good about this story, its pure racism, and it was dealt with appropriately.

  • avgjo

    Yet one more reason to struggle for the repeal of Obamacare.

  • JadedByPolitics

    did NOT help save that farm the WHITE LAWYER saved the man’s farm!

  • melissatx

    In this case, Shirley DID excersize racism. That she learned from it is irrelevant, the real reason this is news is the number of people cheering that behavior on. It was wrong, and justly the “snookerd” NAACP had to admit it.

    Clean your own racist house before you accuse others of the same.
    That is the lesson the NAACP should have learned. Shirley got it, why can’t they?

  • GregInFla

    as well.

  • melissatx

    the Pigford case….UNEMPLOYED Shirley will be just fine. Can you say R E P A R A T I O N S? Trillions, huh? Seems to me ole Shirley uses racism as it suits her.

  • Jack_Savage

    I have dealt with far, far too many Ms. Sherrod’s to believe that this was anything than exactly what it appears to be. You are asking us to believe things other than what we see on the video. Maybe someone who lives in Vermont or Oregon buys this, but I don’t.

    One way to make someone like Ms. Sherrod think you are trying to be superior to her is to show up at her office or place of business as a white person. That’s basically it. I’ve done it. Works like a charm. That’s all the farmer had to do – be white – and he apparently did a good job of it. She then referred him to “his own kind”. Read that again – “his own kind”. A race-neutral person has that term in their vocabulary for just such a teachable moment. Sure. Maybe the farmer’s lawyer lived in Hymietown (h/t J. Jackson). Who knows.

    Anyone who believes this is anything other than exactly what it is would be guilty of giving the benefit of the doubt to someone who sees racism everywhere she looks, because that is all she is looking for.

    Blacks have now earned the ability to treat white people the same way white people treated blacks decades ago, and they seem to be taking advantage of the opportunity. Congratulations. Go for it. I can’t speak for Macon, GA, but in my little corner of the world, race relations have never been worse, and I grew up in the South in the 60′s.

  • charm2

    With what we know thus far, I think people jumped to conclusions about Sherrod. Calling for her firing and actually firing her was way premature. My take on the entire video is that Sherrod was attempting to share a realization she gained from an experience she had. She concluded the problem the farmer faced was poverty not just race since he was white. Does she have racist views? I don’t know enough to say. Her comments at the Naacp could very well be those of someone speaking to others who share and understand the experience of racism.. I’ve said worse things about liberals and sometimes men when I’m with those who have shared my experience.I think in the beginning, she may have taken out her anger over racism on the farmer in not doing all she could for him . She also saw him as acting superior to her. Was he acting superior to her or did she just see what she expected to see from a white man? I don’t know. I need more information before I jump to that conclusion. The video interview I saw on CNN shows her claiming she did come around to doing more for the farmer eventually and admitting she didn’t apologize to him for not wanting to do all she could in the beginning. We need to know more. And at this point I can’t really see anything that has been proven to be worthy of her firing for racism. Now she has had the experience of being mistreated by those more powerful than her. What more could she ask for? Is a lawsuit against the feds next?

  • Uma Richie

    Ms. Sherrod reminds me of one of the worst officers I ever had the displeasure of working with. Our OIC (a tough, but fair boss IMHO) gave this officer plenty of feedback and opportunity to improve, but she was so awful, he came to the conclusion that simply sending her on to her next assignment would be the wrong thing to do. I don’t know exactly what transpired in the meeting, but after he informed her of the action he planned to take, she cried sexual harassment. His career was ruined.

    So forgive me if I don’t believe Ms. Sherrod when she claims that the farmer had a racial motivation to put her in her place. If a public servant cries any kind of -ism when she or her organization is being criticized, my Incompetence Alarm goes off.

    In my opinion, in order to get to Ms. Sherrod’s level, that farmer must have been enmeshed in a horrible USDA goat-rope. By the time he got to her, he had all his ducks in a row and could probably cite the relevant USDA regulations better than she could, and he probably had a better idea than she did of how screwed up her organization really was.

    Unless the untaped part of the speech contained an admission by Sherrod that her perception of the farmer was wrong or an account of the farmer apologizing for being a racist jerk, I have no problem with the scalping.

  • http://www.thehayride.com MacAoidh

    …some $30,000 a year more than private sector employees are making.

  • izoneguy

    Sherrod is all about class warfare. On the one hand she finally admits that no it’s not about race – it’s about rich vs. poor.

    Class warfare is what is raging and Obama is the defiant leader.

    He took out Sherrod as a token gesture to deflect the calls from the NAACP that the tea parties are racist.

  • creditman

    Eric, I think you have been exposed to a red herring.

    I really don’t care if this farmer has moved Ms. Sherrod under the same roof. The fact that she made a decision based on his skin color has no place in our federal government. She made a bad decision that turned our OK. So what ? It makes no difference. She has made a decision through the prism of race.

    The Dept of Agriculture has made the correct decision. What if the next decision she had made due to race had turned out badly. How do we know that she hasn’t made some of those decisions. It was a dumb decision for Ms. Sherrod to make. I don’t pay the bills for those that make bad decisions. It really doesn’t matter that in retrospect she has experienced a “second coming” over the situation.

    Mr Breitbart is doing a very good job and we are so lucky to have him abord.

  • Uma Richie

    Wasn’t it invented yet? Don’t you regret your poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars?

  • izoneguy

    And didn’t she get this job after a settlement with the government?
    What are her qualifications? She kept saying how awful working on a farm is – and she is supposed to help farmers? Help them do what?
    Sue the government?

  • Doc Holliday

    and when have they been fair to us? Were they fair to George Allen? Have they been fair to the Tea Party? Brietbart can’t fire anyone in the Obama Regime.

    BTW, what about the angry woman saying the white guy acted superior? Does he now agree he did that, that he was a racist? What about the NAACP crowd that cheered when she made light of her desire to help him less than “one of her own kind”?

    Maybe this woman has had a change of heart, but she still did something very wrong and as a representative of the US government. But I think the main point we all should focus on is it is time the race baiters are “discouraged” from using those false attacks. If our side fights back, and get’s some scalps, they might start focusing on real issues.

  • yendor

    it seems to me not to be an issue of race so much as class. She didn’t care to
    help the “White Farmer”(as much as she could) because so many “Black Farmers” had lost their farms and he had more than they did. She wanted to teach him a lesson. She didn’t like his superior attitude etc etc.
    I think she was trying to say it’s not all the time White verus Black but it’s really about the who has what. I maybe wrong but that is what is sounded like to me.

  • texdem

    At least with the first half. Nice to see you report this (well, the first half, when you are talking facts; I disagree with analysis).

  • wannabeanncoulter

    This is a win-win for all involved.

    Breitbart raises his profile and generates more website traffic.

    FOX News got a story guaranteed to stoke up its viewers’ outrage about the racist NAACP.

    Glenn Beck gets to be all reasonable and sincere since he didn’t run with the story — the other FOX stars did — once the story turns out to be not what it at first seemed.

    TheWH gets to claim it has a zero tolerance for racism and reverse racism by firing Shirley Sherrod.

    Conservatives and liberals get to criticize the

    And Shirley Sherrod gets to play the part of the strong black woman.

  • melissatx

    Today we learn tyhe WH and BillyJack didn’t really MEAN what they said. Maybe they think they were snookered, too.

    You can bet the farm that if Shirley was white this decision would never get a review.

    Losers, spinesless twerps.

  • ZootSuit

    I think the entire country (Black and White, liberal and conservative) ends up losing with this one.

  • ZootSuit

    I agree with you.

  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    I know she officially/technically resigned, but she said she was pressured to do so, even though she believed she was completely innocent.

  • Uma Richie

    http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/shirleysherrodnaacpfreedom.htm

    Based on her speech alone, I will concede that Ms. Sherrod’s life story is tragic. I will concede that she has been the victim of the most horrible racism in action. I admire her courage in putting her life on the line to fight racism. I believe that much of her early work, done at the risk of death, helped restore Constitutional rule of law. I am impressed that she talked about how God intervened in her life.

    I am still glad that she was forced to resign.

    Later in the speech, she calls Republicans and Obamacare opponents racists:
    “You know, I haven’t seen such a mean-spirited people as I’ve seen lately over this issue of health care. Some of the racism we thought was buried. Didn’t it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bush’s and we didn’t do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black President.”

    So she is equating me, based on my POLICY opposition to Obamacare, with the man who killed her father.

    The main theme of the speech is “Let’s not divide the country on racial lines, let’s divide the country on poor vs. rich lines.”

    She is oblivious to the fact that she perfectly described the Obama administration when she spoke of elites dividing people on racial lines in order to preserve their own power.

  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    If true, that would be a first.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/07/white_house_official_we_didnt.html

  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    n/t

  • Uma Richie

    for this story alone:

    “But two weeks after I went to school at Fort Valley, they called and told me that a bunch of white men had gathered outside of our home and burned the cross one night. Now, in the house was my mother, my four sisters, and my brother, who was born June 6 — and this was September. That was all in that house that night. Well, my mother and one of my sisters went out on the porch. My mama had a gun. Another sister — you know some of this stuff, it’s like movies, some of the stuff that happened through the years — I won’t go into everything. I’ll just tell you about this. One of my sisters got on the phone ’cause we had organized the movements starting June of ’65, shortly — not long after my father’s death.

    That’s how I met my husband. He wasn’t from the North….He’s from up South in Virginia. But anyway my brother and my sisters got on the phone — they called other black men in the county. And it wasn’t long before they had surrounded these white men. And they had to keep one young man from actually using his gun on one of them. You probably would have read about it had that happened that night. But they actually allowed those men to leave. [unclear 13:51]… get out of there.”

  • Achance

    on what kind of employee she was. Generally, there are two types of federal employee (there’s lots of permutations but two broad categories); merit system employees entitled to dismissal only for cause, and appointees/executives outside the merit system who don’t have dismissal for cause protections. The latter are as close to “at will” employees as public employees get, but they’re not that “at will.”

    If she was a merit system employee unless she has a bad record and prior discipline, the merit system board or a labor arbitrator if she’s union will probably put her back to work with back pay if she grieves. If she’s at the appointee level and doesn’t have merit system protections, it is a much more complex question. She would have to sue, then it depends on the facts and the jury. I know that as an employer I wouldn’t take her case to a jury in Atlanta, Georgia. If I were her, I’d get an attorney and start shaking them down for a nice cash settlement.

  • edintexas

    OK, this turns out to be a story of “redemption”. Ms. Sherrod had a “conversion” from seeing the issue as “Black vs. White” to “Those who have vs. those who don’t”. As Breitbart points out today, the NAACP audience didn’t know how the story would end, they were quite happy with the description as presented in the clip. Since the NAACP has not (yet?) released the entire video, we don’t know what their reaction was to the tale of redemption.

    As for her “conversion” – so she is no longer a racist, but rather a Marxist. And a Marxist who NOW describes turning over a Caucasian farmer to someone of “his own kind”. Well, that certainly doesn’t seem to be too racist, does it?

  • edintexas

    I had already put my $0.02 USD in on the phrase in a reply earlier in the comment stream. Nice to see I’m not alone in finding problematic the use of the phrase in 2010.

  • Ausonius

    And specifically the White Man!

    And anyway, the truth is not the point. To use the Dan Rather Leftist philosophy of Journalism and Relativistic Truth, the story is true, even if the evidence does not quite lead to it!

    “It’s the seriousness of the charge” which is of the utmost importance! :)

  • Achance

    She and hubby have scammed the taxpayers out of billions and her director job is a direct payoff by this Administration. Go read the Pigford case’s history. Filed during Clinton alleging abuses and discrimination by USDA during Reagan-Bush I. Clinton administration enters into a consent decree – always suspect when a government does that with a client group; the complainants are all Black farmers or people “trying to farm” but prevented from doing so by the USDA. Consent decrees are as often as not simply a blind for a payoff and they are usually paid out of omnibus settlement bills appropriating money to the AG, no messy details or debate about just what the money is going for and we all know government lawyers would NEVER settle and walk away from a meritorious case. In fact, settlements of grievances and discrimination suits is a favorite method of laundering tax dollars to Democrats and their front groups. It is also very conspicuous that the deadline for identifying the class was just before the 2000 election; got to get your hooves in the trough while you still control the trough.

    They mess around with this all during GWB and then when the Democrats get Congress, they appropriate more money and give more time. So, Comrade Obama gets elected and AG Holder settles the long standing Pigford case handing out all sorts of money including $150K each to Sherrod and her hubby for their “pain and suffering” through the ordeal of trying to keep the shadedown alive during all those lean Republican years. Then, they appoint her to be the Georgia director of USDA’s development division. Anytime you see development in the name of a government agency you’re looking at a money laundry. No wonder they wanted her quickly and quietly out of the picture, probably thinking they’d just do a Van Jones with her and stick her in one of their front groups. Apparently, she either didn’t get the memo or the offer wasn’t good enough.

  • Achance
  • http://www.voteforteri2010.com teridavisnewman

    Shirley Sherrod’s Disappearing Act: Not So Fast
    By: Tom Blumer
    07/20/10 1:52 PM EDT

    My oh my, that happened quickly. Perhaps too quickly.

    Until yesterday, Shirley Sherrod was Georgia Director of Rural Development for the USDA. Earlier in the day at Big Government, Andrew Breitbart put up a video that exposed Ms. Sherrod as someone all too willing to discriminate based on race.

    Within hours of the video’s release, USDA Director Tom Vilsack announced Sherrod’s resignation, and in the process issued an exceptionally strong condemnation (“We are appalled by her actions … Her actions were shameful … she gave no indication she had attempted to right the wrong she had done to this man”).

    The NAACP, at whose Freedom Fund Banquet Sherrod spoke of her discriminatory posture, and at which the audience seemed to indicate approval of her outlook, followed a short time later, virtually echoing Vilsack.

    So I guess we’re supposed to forget about Shirley Sherrod from this point forward.

    Not just yet. Luckily, she’s not going away quietly, and is complaining about Fox News and the Tea Party causing her dismissal. Keep it up, ma?am, because you and the USDA both deserve further scrutiny.

    Ms. Sherrod’s previous background, the circumstances surrounding her hiring, and the USDA’s agenda may all play a part in explaining her sudden departure from the agency. These matters have not received much scrutiny to this point.

    An announcement of Ms. Sherrod’s July 2009 appointment to her USDA position at ruraldevelopment.org gives off quite a few clues:

    RDLN Graduate and Board Vice Chair Shirley Sherrod was appointed Georgia Director for Rural Development by Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack on July 25. Only days earlier, she learned that New Communities, a group she founded with her husband and other families (see below) has won a thirteen million dollar settlement in the minority farmers law suit Pigford vs Vilsack.

    What?

    The news that follows at the link, which appears to pre-date the announcement of Ms. Sherrod’s appointment, provides further details:

    Minority Farm Settlement

    Justice Achieved – Congratulations to Shirley and Charles Sherrod!

    We have wonderful news regarding the case of New Communities, Inc., the land trust that Shirley and Charles Sherrod established, with other black farm families in the 1960′s. At the time, with holdings of almost 6,000 acres, this was the largest tract of black-owned land in the country.

    … Over the years, USDA refused to provide loans for farming or irrigation and would not allow New Communities to restructure its loans. Gradually, the group had to fight just to hold on to the land and finally had to wind down operations.

    … The cash (settlement) award acknowledges racial discrimination on the part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture for the years 1981-85. … New Communities is due to receive approximately $13 million ($8,247,560 for loss of land and $4,241,602 for loss of income; plus $150,000 each to Shirley and Charles for pain and suffering). There may also be an unspecified amount in forgiveness of debt. This is the largest award so far in the minority farmers law suit (Pigford vs Vilsack).

    The Pigford matter goes back a long way, and to say the least has a checkered history, as this May 27, 2010 item at Agri-Pulse demonstrates (bolds are mine):

    As part of a April 14, 1999 class action case settlement, commonly known as the Pigford case, U.S. taxpayers have already provided over $1 billion in cash, non-credit awards and debt relief to almost 16,000 black farmers who claimed that they were discriminated against by USDA officials as they ?farmed or attempted to farm.? In addition, USDA?s Farm Service Agency spent over $166 million on salaries and expenses on this case from 1999-2009, according to agency records.

    Members of Congress may approve another $1.15 billion this week to settle cases from what some estimate may be an additional 80,000 African-Americans who have also claimed to have been discriminated against by USDA staff.

    … Settling this case is clearly a priority for the White House and USDA. Secretary Vilsack described the funding agreement reached between the Administration and advocates for black farmers early this year as ?an important milestone in putting these discriminatory claims behind us for good and in achieving finality for this group of farmers with longstanding grievances.”

    However, confronted with the skyrocketing federal deficit, more officials are taking a critical look at the billion dollars spent thus far and wondering when these discrimination cases will ever end. Already, the number of people who have been paid and are still seeking payment will likely exceed the 26,785 black farmers who were considered to even be operating back in 1997, according to USDA. That?s the year the case initially began as Pigford v. (then Agriculture Secretary) Glickman and sources predicted that, at most, 3,000 might qualify.

    At least one source who is extremely familiar with the issue and who asked to remain anonymous because of potential retribution, says there are a number of legitimate cases who have long been denied their payments and will benefit from the additional funding. But many more appear to have been solicited in an attempt to ?game? the Pigford system.

    Here are just a few questions about Ms. Sherrod that deserve answers:

    * Was Ms. Sherrod’s USDA appointment an unspoken condition of her organization’s settlement?
    * How much “debt forgiveness” is involved in USDA’s settlement with New Communities?
    * Why were the Sherrods so deserving of a combined $300,000 in “pain and suffering” payments — amounts that far exceed the average payout thus far to everyone else? ($1.15 billion divided by 16,000 is about $72,000)?
    * Given that New Communities wound down its operations so long ago (it appears that this occurred sometime during the late 1980s), what is really being done with that $13 million in settlement money?

    Here are a few bigger-picture questions:

    * Did Shirley Sherrod resign so quickly because the circumstances of her hiring and the lawsuit settlement with her organization that preceded it might expose some unpleasant truths about her possible and possibly sanctioned conflicts of interest?
    * Is USDA worried about the exposure of possible waste, fraud, and abuse in its handling of Pigford?
    * Did USDA also dispatch Sherrod hastily because her continued presence, even for another day, might have gotten in the way of settling Pigford matters quickly?

    The media and the blogosphere shouldn’t be so quick to forget about Shirley Sherrod.

    Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Shirley-Sherrods-Disappearing-Act-Not-So-Fast-98846149.html#ixzz0uK6f5LWL

  • Achance
  • janis

    getting what she wants by demanding it long enough that she’s not going to give up her position and further chances to swindle more money out of the system without a dandy fight.

    Has anyone checked to see what the popcorn futures market looks like lately?

  • Achance
  • janis
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • bilsing

    It’s very unfortunate that Ms. Sherrod has been thrown under the bus by the president and the NAACP but that’s the way communists operate. Study history. They have no loyalties. They pretend to be friends, use a person as long as they’re useful and then throw them to the wolves. Remember “history” the American communists were referred to by the USSR as “useful idiots”. There are a lot of useful idiots roaming America today, especially in DC. The only way to overcome them is to use common sense and not let our emotions overrule our good judgment.

    I also believe that today most Americans view the “N” word, not to refer to one’s skin color but to refer to a black heart. There are many people who stir up hatred because their hearts are black. That’s the way I see it, anyway.

  • krk28

    >> Sherrod realizing the issue was not black vs. white but a matter of the poor.

    With respect, that’s not what she said. You are implying that she disavowed her treatment of the White farmer and that is just not the case. If we don’t like out-of-context clips we should also not distort and mis-quote, OK? the woman clearly said…

    “That’s when it was revealed to me that it’s about Poor versus those that Have…and not so much about White..it IS about White and Black…but it’s not, you know…it opened my eyes cause I took him to one of his own and I put him in his hand and felt OK I’ve done my job”.

    So we have race struggle with an added dimension of class struggle. Awesome. That’s what this administration is about and it’s wrong. Regardless of the context the woman seems to believe that government is the stick by which she is going to get even against those that “have” on behalf of the “Poor”, particularly when the “haves” are White.

    Also note that in the so-called “Full” 43 minute video the NAACP has redacted some of her comments at the 21 minute mark which was followed by laughter from the audience. Where’s the reporting on that?

    http://www.naacp.org/news/entry/video_sherrod/

  • Jeff Weimer

    At the time. It happened so fast and with such finality that one could justly surmise that there was nothing exculpatory or defensible about it.

    Now that all the facts are in, it makes the Obama administration look WORSE. Incompetent and scared of their own shadow. They actually moved on this firing based upon what they THOUGHT Foxnews would do. The same Foxnews they called “not-a-news-organiszation” not los long ago.

  • jimmyp

    pwned. from one of your own.

    http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/205190/shirley-sherrod-and-the-shame-of-conservative-media

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …you trying to use *Frum* of all people against us; but it wasn’t, really.

    Now shoo, and get back to band practice.

  • Doc Holliday

    the left was already praising him for swift action now they are bashing him. These race hustlers deserve some of their own medicine.

  • Richard Mullins

    as both a Racist and Marxist(yes, they go hand in hand at times). This person has no reason to be a public official. Better yet, the person belongs in jail for fraud(in the Pigford case). I cannot defend this vermin at all. It also seems that they want to re-hire her back after the NAACP(a organaztion that lost all credibility with Julian Bond at the helm for years) retracted their statement.

  • aesthete

    Does anyone think that an employee telling his story of overcoming his prejudices to help a black man, and asserting that the black man had a “superior” attitude, wouldn’t be grounds for dismissal? She got her job with the people she won a discrimination suit against; live by the political sword, die by the political sword.

  • aesthete

    at his next link — perhaps David Brooks excoriating conservatives for their lack of bipartisanship.

  • merryj1

    She was relating to her audience what her thought process had been 24 years ago, when she was working in the private (NOT government job) sector, and how she had subsequently grown to understand it was economic disparity and not racial differences that mattered. I emphatically disagree with her apparent conclusion, that socialism is a solution, but that’s a different debate.

    There is a lot of “well, yes, but the crowd laughed and agreed:” Presumably, the crowd understood her story to be from “the old days,” and many in that audience would likely understand and be able to relate to her previous mind-set (heck, I’m white and I understaand it). That does not mean or imply that they would approve of the same mind-set if currently applied.

    Breitbart’s entry of the partial tape on the Big site indicated that he did not have the entire tape, but that NAACP did have it. That puts the onus on the NAACP to release or make public the full tape. Instead, they prematurely denounced Sherrod, and the Dept. of Ag — with WH urging — fired her. That’s on them, it’s their bad, not Breitbart’s.

    There is more to the story, but that doesn’t exonerate the Left’s breaking bad on Sherrod (although it may partially explain it):

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Shirley-Sherrods-Disappearing-Act-Not-So-Fast-98846149.html

  • merryj1

    I’d make book on some variation of a “Clinton Twofer” – dupe someone on the Right to make the partial tape public, “dirtying up” the Obama camp in the process, knowing the mud splash-back would ultimately land on the ‘duped’ (right-wing) party. Two birds with one rock.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    See Pigford v. Vilsack.

  • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

    Mr. Breitbart and the good people at Big Government were not scalp hunting and at no time did anyone associated with them call for the firing of Mrs. Sherrod.

    Watch the video and answer the following questions. How were Mrs. Sherrod’s racist remarks received by the local NAACP?

    The issue as Mr. Breitbart pointed out on John King’s show yesterday not Mrs. Sherrod but rather than own racism. Here is an organization that condemned the Tea Party of racism without any evidence. Mr. Breitbart provides evidence of the NAACP’s own racism.

    The NAACP and the Obama administration has tried to make Mrs. Sherrod the issue here. She is not. I am afraid you have fallen for the bait.