« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Did the Federal Government Cause the BP Oil Spill?

It certainly looks like the feds contributed to it.

Step back for a minute. It is a “known fact” that BP’s actions and handling of the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon caused the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

It is an actual fact that the oil spill did not start until after the oil platform sunk.

There is a growing body of evidence that the Coast Guard and fire team handling the blaze on the platform made a series of mistakes that contributed to the oil spill. In fact, in one of the first lawsuits filed, the plaintiffs aren’t even going after British Petroleum, but are instead going after the fire crew alleging the crews should have ignored orders from the Coast Guard.

“It was the flooding of the Deepwater Horizon and the resulting sinking of the rig that directly caused the piping to break and begin spewing millions of gallons of oil into the ocean,” Lloyd Frischhertz and Gerald Maples, lawyers for the spill victims, said in a complaint filed in federal court in New Orleans.

The lawsuit doesn’t seek damages from BP, rig-owner Transocean Ltd. or the U.S. Coast Guard, which helped direct the firefighting effort. The plaintiffs claim the fireboats violated industry standard procedures that warn against using water cannons to attack pressurized oil fires aboard marine vessels.

The Center for Public Integrity has an investigative report out that backs this up, but implicates the Coast Guard.


The Coast Guard has gathered evidence it failed to follow its own firefighting policy during the Deepwater Horizon disaster and is investigating whether the chaotic spraying of tons of salt water by private boats contributed to sinking the ill-fated oil rig, according to interviews and documents.

Coast Guard officials told the Center for Public Integrity that the service does not have the expertise to fight an oil rig fire and that its response to the April 20 explosion may have broken the service’s own rules by failing to ensure a firefighting expert supervised the half-dozen private boats that answered the Deepwater Horizon’s distress call to fight the blaze.

More troubling, it appears that the chaos and lack of Coast Guard supervision may have directly contributed to measures that altered the ballast of the oil rig causing it to list then sink.

There is a lot more to be determined here, but it seems more and more the Coast Guard did not follow its own procedures. This might also explain why the Obama Administration has not been as hard on BP as many on the left would like.

What did the President know about the Coast Guard’s handling of fire? More importantly, why has the White House withheld the fact that the Coast Guard did not follow its own rules and take charge of the firefighting efforts?

Then, of course, we have to ask another question: if the Coast Guard’s actions caused the rig to sink and we already know the oil leaking didn’t start significantly until after the rig sank, is the federal government complicit in the damage?

We cannot and should not avoid blaming British Petroleum. We know from what happened prior to the fire, BP has a lot to answer for. But it seems the federal government’s initial response potentially magnified the problem.

COMMENTS

  • erp617

    If Bush can’t be blamed, the whole thing was just an act of God.

  • Common_Cents

    Obamageddon will find a “good job Brownie” Katrinaesque patsy.

    Obama is untouchable and inherited this too you know.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    BO just burns through them at an accelerated rate.

  • Woo_girl

    what with the Feds not requiring the special turn off valve, with letting them have a pass on regulations that were required, the Feds not letting BP do what they wanted in the first place which is what ultimately solved the problem in the last place. Add into that why have they let so little press into the area, why do they not volunteers to help with the clean up?

  • kevinwilliams

    I realize that plaintiffs lawyers are floating this story/theory, but it’s a non-starter. BHO & team didn’t start screwing things up for a few days, but we can’t blame the initial fire/sinking/lead on them (as much as I might like to!)

    I recall seeing the photo’s of the initial fire-fighting efforts on Fox News – “Coast Guard responds to fire on Deepwater Horizon”, yet there wasn’t an actual Coast Guard boat anywhere in sight – only the rig supply boats that had responded. However, they did what they could, with what they had, and the CG couldn’t have done any different.

    Good news is that of the 126 onboard, 115 managed to escape alive, at night, from a burning/exploding rig, and they were all rescued by the same rig supply boats (not the CG). With fires raging and ballasting pumps inoperative, it was only a matter of time for the rig to tip over and sink.

    The well itself had already blown out by this point (which caused the fire), and when the rig finally sank, the riser was torn off from the BOP stack, leading to the spill.

    No way can I believe that the fire fighting water led to the sinking of the rig.

  • acat

    The Fed grabbed responsibility for leaks from offshore platforms a long time ago – and the Fed were the ones directing the efforts on the night the drilling platform sank.

    While it’s of course insane to think that Obama ordered the platform sunk, it’s also insane to believe that Bush ordered the New Orleans levee system or the twin towers bombed.

    That said, this isn’t really an argument intended for the public, this is one meant for a court of law, as in if there’s a finding that the Fed first responders screwed up, then the corporations are no longer completely on the hook for the disaster clean-up. That’s the game here.

    Mew

  • snowshooze

    If the fire had been allowed to burn that it would have affected the ballast floats…it depends on the structure, how much heat was concentrated at the ballasts and their framework, were they completely sound of measurable leakage…pretty obvious questions I would think. Anything below the waterline would be fine, and there is more below the waterline on these rigs than there is above it. I would think those who Engineered the platform would have designed for such an instance…do not sell them out just yet.
    It could have flamed away for weeks, for all I know, giving ample time to extinguish the fire with foam or chemicals.
    And of coarse, had the oil been burning off less would have been sea borne floating slick.
    I am certain these issues will all come up later, with everyone out to sue BP to the edge of bankruptcy, this will make an interesting diversion at best, I am afraid. You know everyone is thinking of the 20 billion dollars… so if this threatens that little nest egg I am sure the Chicago boys know just how to handle that little detail.

  • RetiredFF

    I cannot figure out why they wanted so badly to put out the fire. It was well involved, the damage to the rig significant. Saving any of the rig never made any sense. The only way to contain and consume the runoff/spill at the rig was to let it burn. Putting the fire out was a bad call IMHO.

  • rbdwiggins

    No way can I believe that the fire fighting water led to the sinking of the rig.”

    If you had read the report, or had any knowledge of maritime firefighting, you would also know the prime directive of fighting fires on oil rigs: Do Not Sink The Rig…

    The excessive amount of water used in the effort to extinguish the fire, contra established protocol which called for the use of fire retardant foam, altered the ballast, sunk the rig and severed the pipe.

    The Coast Guard was either neglegent, or complicit, in its initial handling of the response.

  • wannabeanncoulter

    Does this mean the US Coast Guard has to “voluntarily” establish a $20 billion escrow account to pay “legitimate” claims made by oil spill victims?

  • rbdwiggins

    It means the US Taxpayer will involuntarily contribute to a congressional slush fund set up to handle the illegitimate claims manufactured by unknown victims of the oil spill.

  • http://minorcan-maven.blogspot.com/ minorcanmaven

    What a giant ball of tangled yarn. I really HOPE we all learn the whole truth, as much as possible from this cast of characters.

  • http://www.barrypopik.com barrypopik

    I invested in BP for dividends. The oil leak has been plugged. Rush Limbaugh reports tha no one can find oil to skim anymore.

    Does BP still owe $20 billion to Obama’s favorite Democrats? Will I ever get a dividend, or do they take it all?

    Exoon didn’t go bankrupt after Valdez. ExxonMobil is the largest publicly traded company in the world.

    Obama’s job-killing Gulf drilling moratorium means that (besides foregin interests) only BP is drilling in the gulf. BP is also, infamously, drilling off Libya.

    BP’s chief Washington lobbyist is John Podesta’s brother. It’s a well-connected company.

    Do I get any damn dividends anymore so I can feed my family, or has BP become a slush fund for Democrats?

    Jeez Louise, I need one of the largest companies in the world to start paying dividends again! I’ve got two kids!

  • snowshooze

    I don’t believe that the oil and gas fire was concentrating heat at the surface of the rig, and that it was pretty much an airborne flame stream…posing no immediate threat to what was left of the rig.
    It would have been a lot easier to have plugged the leak on your feet on the rig than operating robots a mile deep.

  • persiflage

    RetiredFF said – what was the big rush to put out the fire? It was a point source fire, way out in the Gulf. It wasn’t like the fire was going to spread to the rest of the neighborhood! They could have taken a week to buoy the pipe at 100-200 feet depth, to support it (divers can work very well at that depth), arranged a mile radius circle of oil booms around the platform, and then cut the well pipe cleanly above the buoy support system. Now you have an oil leak, but it’s only at 100 feet depth instead of 5000. Using divers, they could have guided a new control system over the cleanly cut pipe end and secured the oil leak in another week.

  • RetiredFF

    right on. If it got so extremely hot and started to really compromise the rig, you would only try to save the floating ballasts. I saw quite a few boats burn to the water line, and amazing to see how intact they were just at and below the water surface and they were still afloat. The only ones that sunk were those that were deluged with amounts of water that could not extinguish the fire anyway?. It’s all about contain, extinguish and then salvage. Sometimes, extinguishing too quickly may hinder containment and salvage, depending upon the products or structures involved. Again, my 2 cents worth here. Glad to see this post, thanks EE for posting, this incident and the poorly handled MSM coverage has bothered me for months. Gotta love RS.

  • bobojake

    I think it is time to start putting the file together to try obama on many charges all related to this oil spill disaster. What went on in his presence with Tony Hayward is far worse then any WATERBOARDING THAT may have occured with Gitmo Terriosts and in my opine obama approved everything that was threatened or occurred in the Whitehouse that day. It will go down in history as a day of shame in obamas short tenure.
    God Bless America

  • RetiredFF

    are right in line with what you just spelled out, thank you! What you stated makes perfect sense, maybe a good lesson will come of this. I just pray that we do not abandon our research and development of off shore and on-shore drilling, with out both of these , we lose as a free and sovereign nation.

  • phenne

    From that in-depth review of what happened, the details will show, most likely, government bureaucracy got involved and messed things up.

    “Government isn’t the solution to the problem, Government IS the problem.” Ronald Reagan

  • JoeG

    If you had read the report, or had any knowledge of maritime firefighting, you would also know the prime directive of fighting fires on oil rigs: Do Not Sink The Rig?

    Many ships have been sunk by fireboats. The most famous would be the Normandy sunk at the pier in NYC during WWII. Fire boats ignored orders to quit pumping because the ship was listing. Eventually the ship capsized and sank.

  • GreyCloak

    The fire did not affect the ballasts below the water … tons of water added a hundred feet in the air capsized the rig. No mention of “foam” that might have put out or controlled the fires without a capsize.

    No Coast Guard Cutter saved rig workers; that was done by local ships, although it is what the Coast Guard is supposed to do.

    The head of the MMS, Elizabeth Birnbaum, was appointed by Obama in Jul;y 2009, almost a YEAR before the spill.

    I hope that Mr. Feinberg will reject the ~$53,000 claim against BP for VP Biden’s visit to the Gulf Coast: “We are not accustomed to paying Public Figures for appearances that are part of their normal duties.” I don’t recall President Bush billing The City of New Orleans for his visits during Katrina. Maybe if Biden or Obama spent a day digging up tar balls … THAT would be productive.

    I read that several States received $25 million “blanket grants” from BP … it is probably too much to expect from investigative reporters to figure out where THAT money was spent. Meanwhile, television reports show thirty “workers” shoveling a few bags of polluted sand into bags … one might ask “how many bags per day per person?” But reporters want ratings, not truth. In the first month of the oil spill, one pelican got more airtime than Obama.

  • GreyCloak

    No grand conspiracy, but folks fouled up.

    If the Obama Administration wants to claim “Involvement since Day 1,” they are either liars or should accept responsibility for allowing the spill.

    NOTE: I doubt that media hacks have the fortitude to question why capping the well (granted, the last [successful] time) was delayed a day or two by Government interference.

  • GreyCloak

    BP paid its last in June, declared BEFORE the disaster. They have declared that NONE will be paid subsequently. My Mom (in Florida) has always been happy with her BP investment, but will have to depend on her Government pension for a while.

    If it is any consolation, many UK pensions will be reduced due to the suspension, and even the New York State Employees Fund will be hurt (and has filed suit).

    What is important is that American politicians cannot receive contributions from a “foreign” firm, and are only too happy to demonize “BRITISH” Petroleum, even though the company employs tens of thousands in America (remember Standard Oil of Indiana [Amoco] and Atlantic Richfield [ARCO], both acquired by BP) and pays $billions in taxes and fees.

    BP took a major hit to earnings in the last quarter ($17 billion loss), to include the $20 billion promised to Obama. As result, they may pay less taxes to the IRS, but the “slush fund” is fully funded, and will pay Union workers (by Federal Law), States, and Municipalities (read___Politicians and their relatives). If you were rich enough to invest in the company, you get nothing.

    The Obama Unemployment Initiative(Moratorium) cost 20,000 direct jobs, and probably 100,000 in support industries.

    As Prime Minister Cameron has explained to Obama, and I have had to explain to my Mother: BP USED to pay dividends, but Obama and the Democrat Congress won’t let them … this hurts many people.

    I sympathize with the kids, but Your President would encourage you to apply for Food Stamps, WIC, TANF, and other programs to keep them in food. If you sadly retain any of the money you have earned from years of work, please be prepared to part with it before The Government kicks in.

  • edniceville

    is wrapped around one GIANT tarball of oil from the oil slick. We will, most likely, never know all the answers, let alone the whole truth about this mess. Rest assured, BHO, will make sure his hands are not dirty. Regarding Greycloak’s question about the $25 mill that went to the states…at least here in Florida, the bulk of it was used for a massive advertising campaign to counter the media’s flood of misinformation and scaremongering (that they do so well) to try and stem the tide of tourist cancellations down here. Just as the shrimpers and fisherman in Louisiana depend on the Gulf for their livelihood, we along Northwest Florida’s Gulf Coast depend on tourism for our livelihood. Hotel and Restaurant revenues are down over 60% in some areas thanks to the fallout from the spill. Real Estate contracts have been cancelled and never begun because people are afraid to come down here. The media has done a superb job of frightening people away from the gulf beaches. Where is their apology? Where is their “fund”?

  • kiddoc99

    Isn’t trying to blame the government for the spill because of it’s firefighting efforts a little like trying to sue me for breaking your grandmother’s ribs while performing CPR imperfectly after she collapsed from a heart attack, when there was no one else there to do it. If the firefighting efforts helped sink the horizon and worsen the spill then indeed this must be investigated, exposed and remedied. But extending that to the level of blame is disingenious.

  • witsend

    I totally agree with you regarding the Obama/Hayward meeting. I have never before been so embarrassed by our president. And this from a man who “says” he wants to wipe out bullying in schools! Some example he is setting!

  • witsend

    There is NOT always someone to blame. Fact is “STUFF HAPPENS.” (I dressed up that quote – I usually use the other word.) With that in mind, while the firefighters should not take full responsibility, neither should BP have to take the blame for complications caused by others.

  • larrymiller

    We have an administration that is wanting us to believe that the government in Washington is the all knowing and all caring Big Brother that will take care of us. If they were to admit that any of their agencies helped make matters worse, this would not fit the image they are trying to project. But… we know better!

  • edintexas

    It is good to have the professional opinion of an experienced oil rig fire fighter who was on the scene at the time of the explosion and fire.

    Ummm, you are a professional giving us your on the scene observations, aren’t you? Fire fighter? Graduate of Annapolis? Graduate of a Merchant Marine Academy with appropriate papers? Do you at least own a Sunfish sailboard?

  • Curt409

    Why, after the the BP spill failed to produce a sufficient crisis, are there suddendly more oil spills? Surely all wells and pipeline have been reinspected thoroughly since the BP spill?

  • http://www.helpawhiteguy.com livefreenh

    These two things: “acted stupidly” and “whose ass to kick”. These are direct results of the left worrying about “who is right” instead of “what is right”. Unfortunately, if you always search for the truth, the bad guys are always found out as an incidental fact. This annoys them to no end because ultimately, it is a game for them — some sort of power trip. For me, sadly, it is life and death. I guess I lost this one.

  • http://www.twitter.com/RS_yoyo yoyo

    The reason I ask this is to have some backup on what I am about to say:

    I was in the Navy from 1991 to 2002. I was an AT2 and served mostly in squadrons (S-3s and F-14s), however, I did serve a short stint (just over a year) on the USS Forrestal (CV/AVT-59) as my first command (I decommissioned her in Philly in 1993). That said, EVERY sailor who goes through basic training is forced to watch “Trial by Fire: The Forrestal Catastrophe” as part of Fire Fighting Week.

    For those who do not know, in the Gulf of Tonkin in July, ?? 1969 (0800 local), the USS Forrestal was the victim of a catastrophic chain of events that culminated in the loss of 129 Sailors and Marines. A 5-inch Zuni Rocket was accidentally fired off of an F-4 and struck the wing tank of an A-4 on the flight deck, just prior to launching a strike package against North Vietnam. Within 5 minutes, the entire fantail was ablaze (then LT John F. McCain was in his A-4 at the time and barely escaped with his life) and two 500 lb. bombs had gone off, completely wiping out the initial fire response team. Within 5 minutes more, another 7 bombs would cook off and obliterate the fantail, the O-3, O-2, O-1 aft, and Hangar Bay 3 (Main Deck). The fire was not contained until 1600 and not defeated until 0400 the next day.

    That last sentence is the reason for this reply.

    Post-fire investigational analysis of the PLAT footage revealed serious flaws in the fire-fighting response (subsequent fire-party responders after the first THREE fire teams were KIA by the nine 500 lb. bombs going off 60 feet away). The footage showed that in an attempt to fight the fire, the fire teams were defeating themselves – you see, they were fighting a fuel fire (and Magnesium fire) with both AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) and sea water. The result was the Foam that was defeating the fuel fire (the foam floats ON TOP OF THE FUEL) was being washed overboard by the straight sea water. Additionally, the hours and hours of throwing water on a gas-fire actually FLOODED a large section of the ship and placed burning fuel in places that it had not been prior or would not have gone to otherwise.

    You see, the ones EXPERIENCED in fighting the fires, the ones who knew HOW to properly take charge and defeat a fire on the flight deck were killed within the first 3-5 minutes of this disaster. The ones remaining valiantly fought (and eventually prevailed against) the fire, but were going about it all wrong. This is the reason why EVERY Sailor going through Basic Training must learn to fight fires — PROPERLY. The hope is that the 1969 Forrestal Fire will not ever be repeated.

    I believe the same thing that happened on the Forrestal happened to DWH. The initial blast was so catastrophic, the crew abandoned (rightfully so) the vessel. The initial responders either did not have the knowledge, or did not have equipment to properly fight this fire. Without some sort of CG leadership DIRECTING the fire-fighting response, what we ended up with was a valiant effort being made by several fire-fighting responders that may have inadvertently caused more damage than otherwise would have been inflicted to the vessel, IF proper direction/technology were employed against the fire.

    Sorry for the long post.

  • canoe346

    Obama has used the USCG (as well as other government agencies) as pawns
    from the very beginning of the disaster. USCG has actually stop or delayed
    clean-up and prevention efforts on instructions from someone in the Obama
    administration. However, having working in the oil patch offshore for a number of years, my question is “why did the BOP fail”. That type of failure rarely, if ever happens. Since the BOP is operated by hydraulis, just one well placed
    saboteur could delibertly screw-up the system to prevent operation. No one yet has profe (and my not ever) that the BOP was disabled, but the resulting push for Obama’s Cap and Trade bill, that BP helped write, raises question.

  • canoe346

    Obama has used the USCG (as well as other government agencies) as pawns
    from the very beginning of the disaster. USCG has actually stop or delayed
    clean-up and prevention efforts on instructions from someone in the Obama
    administration. However, having working in the oil patch offshore for a number of years, my question is “why did the BOP fail”. That type of failure rarely, if ever happens. Since the BOP is operated by hydraulis, just one well placed
    saboteur could delibertly screw-up the system to prevent operation. No one yet has profe (and my not ever) that the BOP was disabled, but the resulting push for Obama’s Cap and Trade bill, that BP helped write, raises question.

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    Surely there is videotape of the firefighting efforts, that would clearly show water being poured onto the oil rig as it tipped and went over. It shouldn’t be too hard to prove that’s what happened, and if what you are saying about the regulations is correct, it is the Coast Guard’s job to make sure it doesn’t. Case closed.

    But though I’ve seen plenty of still photos of the rig on fire, I haven’t seen any extended video sufficient to reveal the chain of events. Has anyone else? Not to get into conspiracy theories here, but it kinda makes you wonder.

  • Curt409

    Over the last year, the left has had a hard time backing up their cases with video.
    Wierd. Our side has stacks of it.

  • olddog

    another was needed, so brother O could appease the Greenies on the left, as his ratings continue to fall, The rest is up to real investigators, to uncover,hopefully before its ancient history, the real truth about what happened, I don’t believe in coincidences.
    Zoros buys controlling interest in a Brazilian oil co, they net 15 or so billion a year, but B.O. lends them 2 billion tax payer dollars while hesitating opening new drilling, finally Oks some drilling only in deep water and shortly thereafter BP blows up. Makes a person go HMMM!!
    One Old Dog
    Support our Troops, the left really isn’t!

  • clariancall

    The government has the responsibility in federal waters. There were lack of effective inspections beforehand and lack of focused effort afterward. Using lessons learned from this mishap, a comprehensive plan-of-action must be in place delineating clear lines of communications and responsibilities. Periodic training exercises are necessary to remain effective and to accommodate changes in off shore-drilling technology. I believe these things were not done because of the very low incidents of these kinds of problems in the past. However, having witnessed the impact of this problem it is clear that an effective plan of action must be done, ASAP.

  • Common_Cents

    It’s amazing how long it stays in tact.

  • scubadiver49er

    This makes pewrfect sense to me. Now look at the mess we have; Didn’t Barry say to “get out of the way so he can clean up the “mess”??? Where is he now??? Maine, Martha’s Vineyard, Florida???

    And “yoyo”, that is a great story about what happened on the Forrestal. Knowledge is everything, and history DOES repeat itself. Where are youleading us to, King Barry??? (“I Just Can’t Wait to be King” – Lion King)

  • vandalii

    If so, then perhaps “act of god” might fit ;-)

  • vandalii

    If so, then perhaps “act of god” might fit ;-)

  • dianecee

    I will always believe that our government intended for the oil rig explosion. There are so many factors pointing to the source of this evil. I will remain above the crime by planning and plotting for my own salvation. I am living in a nation without governance.

  • jp37

    To those whom statements on the fire on the oil rig all the fire fighting boat were civilian boats used to fighting doc fires and fires in port. they most likely did not have foam or the chemicals needed to fight an oil fire.
    As for any investigation into why the oil rig sank was stop by every bodies favorite house leader Nancy Pelosii .
    Also the oil rig was outside US waters Fifty miles out in the Gulf Of Mexico.

  • Warrior

    Navy on a ‘gator freighter out of Little Creek between ’75 and ’78.

    I remember watching that film in basic. What a mess. But you are right, we learned how to fight shipboard fires. And not just at bootcamp.

    We must have had fire drills five times a week at sea. And everybody was cross-trained in case a specialty team was killed.

    Good post!

  • http://www.twitter.com/RS_yoyo yoyo

    that I forgot to mention above:

    I do not recall in the history books anywhere that President Johnson placed a moratorium on all Flight Deck operations of all Aircraft Carriers until the cause of the flight deck disaster was determined, corrected, and regulated in such a way to guarantee that an incident of similar size and magnitude would ever happen again. Come to think of it, the Handler and his/her Yellow Shirts still stack the fantail full of birds prior to flight operations, the same way they have done since 1969 and before.

    – BP and co. need to have the freedom to LEARN from this disaster, feel obligated to PASS the information to the industry at large, and then-and only then-shut down wells determined unsafe and get them up to standard, one at a time and in a manner of priority.

    We have a blanket moratorium and no standards. It is the “Cart-Horse” thing. They need to swap them around.

    That is just my opinion.

  • SilverhairedSurfer

    This is just my opinion, with no proof whatsoever, but considering the lying, scheming Obamanation Administration, I find it fairly plausible that BHO may have ordered the rig sabotaged in order that he, (the hero) could rise to the occasion, Nationalize the oil industry, and save us all from Giant Oil. Just like he did with General Motors. When he found that GM could NOT compete with the likes of Toyota, he ordered his goons to begin making false claims against Toyota with the prevaricated stories of unsafe accellerators. The end always justifies the means with our liberal friends. All the exhaustive investigations could find NOTHING wrong with the accellerators.
    The Obaminators had to quit making these absurd, false claims when things got too hot for them to handle. Suddenly there are no more problems with the accellerators. Maybe there NEVER WAS anything mechanically wrong with the cars except for the tyranical LIES put out by Obonga’s GOONS, at HIS command, in order to power-grab an unfair advantage over a company that Obamatons could not possibly compete with on a level playing field. Just another day’s work for Socialist/communists.

  • gunsrus

    foolish me, from the Obama was carrying on I just assumed

  • websmith

    It is well known that BP cut corners to save time and money and caused the entire thing to happen. Probably the worst thing that they did was to switch to clear water during drilling instead of using muddy water to lubricate the bore. The is drilling 101 and known to cause blow outs. If Hayward was going to jail and having his property seized to compensate his victims instead of a cushy retirement, the Gulf oil leak would not have happened.

    The government’s insistence on trying to manage industries that they know nothing about is what set this up. We only need one law that says, “If you do anything to damage the lives, rights, or property of the American citizens, you will be incarcerated and your property will be seized to compensate the victims”.

    We don’t need reams of regulations that only serve to force prices up and act as a target for corporations to beat.

  • Martin Knight
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • Doc Holliday

    but he was certainly lost. lol

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    He also blew by a warning sign from Moe Lane.

    Not wise.

  • Doc Holliday
  • tara2009

    What happened in the gulf was no act of God it was an act of greedy men who cut corners to save a little money and inspectors that were kicking up their hills and enjoying the perks BP gave them to turn their backs on the safety of the oil rig. Also the givernment has a part in it also, if they would have let bp to drill in safer waters it would have been easier to stop the spill. All it boils down to is greed, corruption and a n administration that did not want to let bp drill, so they let them drill in uncertain depts. Obama has to be stopped he is systematically killing the America that we know and turning it into a socialist,communistic,terroist and radical revoluntionary country. LONG LIVE THE AMERICA WE KNOW AND DOWN WITH THE AMERICA THAT OBAMA AND SOROS HAS IN MIND. GOD BE MERCIFUL UNTO US,
    AMERICA TURN FROM YOUR SINS AND RETURN TO WORSHIPING
    ALMIGHTY GOD,HE WILL HEAR AND WILL BLESS OUR LAND AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!MEHPENSACOLA,FL