« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Sleeper in Alaska

The Wall Street Journal has a great overview of what is at stake today in Alaska.

Allies of Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski are looking over their shoulders before Tuesday’s GOP primary. Internal polls taken for her campaign show Fairbanks attorney Joe Miller closing the gap. A new RT Nielson poll also has Ms. Murkowski’s lead down to 47% to 35%. If accurate, it shows Ms. Murkowski below the level of support where an incumbent can be considered safe.

Polling, however, in Alaska can be problematic and there is a troubling sign for Lisa Murkowski – with Palin, the Tea Party Express, and others on the ground driving up turn out, the higher the turn out the worse it is for her.

The odds are in Murkowski’s favor today, but we shouldn’t count out Joe Miller just yet. This could be fun.

COMMENTS

  • mboyle1988

    but he’s not going to. Liberal Lisa is going back to DC.

  • chihank

    I like Joe Miller, but his chances of ousting Lisa Murkowski today are about the same as Levi Johnston’s chances of being elected Mayor of Wasilla next year.

    However what the Senate experience could do for Joe Miller is enable him to run for the AK House seat should Don Young retire. Young is in his 70s. So an open House seat is very possible in the next few years.

  • Section9

    Yes, he could win tonight, but I don’t anticipate that. Liberal Lisa has outspent the young lad by 20-1. She appears to have been caught napping, however, so I expect a closer Murkowski win than should have been expected.

    Will Miller shock as Palin did in 2006? Highly unlikely. However, it’s worth pointing out that one poll going into that election was 40 points off.

    Don Young isn’t going anywhere, imho. He’ll die with his boots on.

  • Achance

    It had been obvious for a year that Murkowski couldn’t be re-elected and Binkley never got any traction. She could do no wrong and was the Anchorage Daily News’ favorite “Republican” because they thought she’d be easier for a Democrat to beat. If there was any shock it was in how handily she beat Knowles in the General.

    If all of Alaska was black helicopter country like Wasilla and the Mat-Su Valley, Miller would win in a walk. Fortunately, there is more to the State than Sarah-Country and R stands for Republican in the rest of the State, not Redneck.

    Miller can position himself for something by actually doing something and keeping the job for awhile. He might try running successfully for municipal assembly or state house or holding an appointed position. When it comes to actual government executive or legislative experience, Miller’s resume is even thinner than Palin’s.

  • rdelbov

    Miller’s future depends on how well he does. Not sure about RT Nielsen as its a teaparty express paid for poll. I cannot find the cross tabs on it.

    I think its 90% certain that Lisa Murkowski has polled Alaska and unlike McCain who is spending 20 million on his primary. Senator M. is sitting on 2 million bucks and apparently is not too frightened.

    Upsets happen so who knows?

  • http://www.2010blog.net jsanzone

    We may have to revise terming it the year of the ‘anti-incumbent’ and hope for simply, the ‘year of the anti-Democrat.’ Even Murkowski, the model of political dynasty, incumbency, and RINOcerism, isn’t behind in a single poll (isn’t even less than 10 points ahead, I think). McCain’s win tonight will be establishment Republicans’ big victory; with Murkowski playing a supporting role in the media narrative. “Tea parties ineffectual” will be the theme (in perhaps stronger words like ‘racist militiamen lose in Arizona, Alaska’). We have some victories to be proud of this year, but Alaska and Arizona Republicans, you disappoint.

  • mboyle1988

    Lisa is also not nearly as smart as John. I’m hoping she’s stupid in a big way. There’s just no excuse for a liberal Republican coming from Arkansas. When Scott Brown is more conservative than you are, you should be embarrassed. I’m actually fine with the Weird Sisters from Maine. I’d rather have Rhinoceri than Donkeys, but in conservative states, Elephants only, please.

  • mboyle1988

    by Arkansas, I meant Alaska. Sorry guys, I blame the lack of sleep. Haha!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • rdelbov

    if I had to pick my ideal US senator it would not be her. I don’t have the answers but there has to be some reason why Alaskans seem to value representatives who load up the bucks from DC to bring them back to Alaska.

    I hope we see a new generation of Alaskans who have more of the Palin spirit.

    I certainly understand where Stevens was coming from. Alaska was mostly owned by the Federal government. Under Stewart Udall -in the early 1960′s-Alaska got the shaft. Look at Anwr and all the other lands the federal government tied up. On the flip side Alaska’s people fell heir to huge oil/gas/coal resources in state owned land.

    You would think you would get some sort of senators like Idaho or Wyoming or Utah. Small government people-cheap with money but Alaska got the pork fever.

    I wish Miller the best but I did in Missouri for 10 years. So you have to show me.

  • Achance

    than conservative. Federal environmental policy, land policy and national defense are what keeps it mostly in the R column. There are few places that a true social conservative can get elected, the Mat-Su Valley and Fairbanks suburbs, The people here who style themselves fiscal conservatives are actually more anti-government and anti-social welfare spending than true fiscons; their beef isn’t with spending per se but rather what the spending goes for.

  • http://www.viewfromstonewater.blogspot.com hrh40

    These comments come to you from a Murkowski man from way back …

  • Achance

    in a very long time. You guys in the Lower 48 created her “conservative” credentials, her record here was populist pandering and self-aggrandizement while spending more than any other governor in Alaska’s history.

    Since the US owns or controls most of Alaska, Alaskans like for the US to pay for its own stuff here. Likewise, since the US looted Alaska from 1867 until 1959 and hardly built anything here except for the military, Alaska has a tremendous need for infrastructure. There are NO roads west of a line drawn from Anchorage to Fairbanks or north of a line drawn east from Fairbanks to the Canadian border except the Pipeline haul road which is dirt. Everything that goes to Western and Arctic Alaska has to come by summer barge or by air. One of the “pork” initiatives that Sen. Stevens had was to get running water in every village, and by that I mean one source of pure running water, not indoor plumbing in every house, which is unheard of in rural Alaska

  • rdelbov

    I leave the palin judgement to Alaskans.

    I do note that Alaska currentlys sits on a 40 billion dollar permanment fund so its not like its without resources. Alaska spends 1/2 of its energy receipts every year and has a budget surplus.

    Liberterians don’t try to raid the national purse??

    I stand by my point that whether Alaskan is Conservative or Liberterian both Murkowskis (Father and daughter) plus Stevens have been spending machines. Don Young too.

  • mbecker908

    so-called “surpluses” in Alaska are not comparable to any other state or the fed.

  • texasgalt

    Miller has the makings of a good Senator.

    West Point Graduate
    Bronze Star Winner
    Law Degree from Yale
    Master in Economics from Univ of Alaska
    Practicing attorney (but we wont hold that against him) :-)

    Joe is full of enthusiasm and and apparently good on the stump. He knows how to use social media.

    http://joemiller.us/index.php

    I don’t understand the politics of Alaska but if they don’t want him as Senator up north, let him move to Texas and take on Cornyn. Seems to me he has a Texas state of mind . . . . and Big John lost his a couple of years ago.

  • Achance

    not half. The Constitution requires that 25% of all revenue from non-renewable resources, mostly oil, must be placed in the Permanent Fund. Every year, the Permanent Fund is “inflation proofed.” After inflation proofing half of the Funds earnings are distributed per capita as the Permanent Fund Dividend and the other half is available for appropriation by the Legislature but is usually returned to the Fund.

    There were a couple of years during Palin’s time of stratospheric oil prices; the spot average in ’08 was over $133/bbl, and not even Gov. Palin and the Alaska Legislature could figure out how to spend all the money. In addition to the PFD, they also did a “Natural Resource Rebate” of $1000 a head, which goes a long way towards explaining her high popularity numbers at the time. The Leg also did a billion dollar forward funding for education and a bunch of other dedicated funds; when you have that much money floating around nobody much cared that dedicated funds are unconstitutional.

    As to the federal spending, the US has a huge military presence here. The FAA has a huge presence here as most over the Pole flights traverse Alaska airspace and the Great Circle route from the US to the Orient traverses Alaska as well; that’s why Anchorage International is among the largest air cargo ports in the World. Spending on AIA does benefit Alaska and Alaskans, but it also benefits every consumer in the US. The 17th Coast Guard District does benefit Alaska and Alaskans, but it also benefits every container ship traversing the Great Circle Route from the Orient to West Coast ports and thus it benefits every consumer in the US. The Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, NOAA, NMFS, BIA, IHS, etc. have a very large presence here but it is because two thirds of that landmass south of Hawaii called Alaska is two-thirds federal or Indian land. Consequently, much of that spending in Alaska that everybody likes to complain about is the US spending money on its own stuff and for its own purposes. Alaska does derive some benefit from the US spending money on its own stuff, but most of us would be much happier if the US turned most of its land here over to us and took all their Democrat-voting employees and its environmental regulations back to the Lower 48.

  • Richard Mullins

    and with that I would look in to what this has against you. So tell me, what other things do you know about Art Chance? Did get it from LexusNexus? or did maybe a Third hand person? I really want to know.

  • Dan McLaughlin

    I’m actually wondering why high turnout would be bad for Murkowski. Usually, if I’m a bland establishment incumbent in an R primary I want high turnout so the casual voter carries the day over the fired-up activists. But I admit I’m not really an expert on the way the ground game plays out in Alaska (among other things I assume weather doesn’t really deter Alaskans from voting). We did see in the Scott Brown race how high turnout could favor the Tea Party favored candidate in hostile territory, but that’s a different kettle of clam chowdah.

  • Achance

    by telling people something which is in my bio if you click for my profile. Actually, Murkowski needed me more than I needed him; I was already the supervisor of all the labor relations staff when he took office, so taking the appointment got me a couple hundred bucks a pay period and made me the one everybody could blame stuff on.

  • spainishirish

    The establishment media just couldn’t bring itself to use the proper term. After all, it is hard to be a good Marxist without a great deal of denial.

  • emaberk

    once Conservatives take back the house and senate in November! Any ideas on the first order of business to take care of? Impeachment maybe? dare to dream :)

  • rdelbov

    is just that. The higher the turnout in primaries the better for the better known incumbent/establishment candidate.

    That’s like the incumbent who fails to get 50% will lose the runoff. That was the odds on Lincoln this year but she won the runoff. Old saws can get rusty.

    I defer to “real” Alaskans” but I believe that while the state does have party registration independents can go and vote in either primary. Its not a closed primary state?

    So when 60% of the electorate can vote in either primary I think its hard to poll and hard to know exactly what will happen.

  • Oz

    Is there anyone on the GOP bench up there that would have the makings of a good senator, governor, or at large representative?

    Also, are you hearing anything about turnout?

    Oz

  • Achance

    ballot can be taken by Rs or NPs, but not registered Ds. I don’t expect a high turnout because most of the races are deadly dull this year. Nobody here in Juneau has any primary opposition, or even meaningful oppostion in the General. The Governor’s race on the R side has been deadly dull with Parnelll having a commanding lead though the Anchorage Daily News and the AFL-CIO tried to make some mischief by endorsing Walker. I don’t watch much network television (almost all broadcast television and all cable television is from Anchorage), so I don’t know how much effort has gone into the Democrat race in Anchorage but my sense is that the Berkowitz-French contest has been a borefest even there; it is just a contest to see who Parnell beats.

    The Republican Lt. Gov. race has a little bit of a contest between Jay Ramras, a forty/fifty-something Fairbanks Legislator who gained notoriety for dating the 19 yr. old daughter of high-level legislative staffer, and Mead Treadwell, a Hickel appointee whose “establishment Republican” credentials are pretty good. Ramras is better known, but I think Treadwell will win narrowly.

    The Republican US Senate race has been the noisiest with Miller and Murkowski. Again, I don’t watch network television so I haven’t seen how much presence either has in Anchorage. My wife says that Miller has a lot of street corner sign wavers in ANC. I’ve had Juneau talk radio on all morning and it has been nonstop Miller commercials, but that’s preaching to the choir; anybody listening to Rush long ago decided who they were voting for and here in Juneau, Palin’s endorsement is the kiss of death, even the Republicans here despise her and the Democrats truly loathe her. I know I’m sick to death of hearing the phrase “truie conservative,” an oxymoron in Alaska politics.

    There is a parental notice initiative on the ballot which has sparked some interest. I would say that helps Miller, but not much. There’s also a libertarian sponsored ethics initiative that has sparked a lot of advertising and interest. I can’t judge who that plays for and against. Oppostion to this initiative is the first thing in a very long time that has both the Chamber and the AFL-CIO on the same side.

  • Achance

    Lots of legislators and former legislators that I could get behind for any of the big offices. We’ve had the Goverorship for almost eight years and should have produced some good experienced appointee types who could run, but that hasn’t worked out. The Murkowski appointees were mostly run off by Palin and either went back to their private affairs or into lobbying. Palin brought in a few malcontents that had left Murkowski and a few of her Wasilla buddies but largely left the holdovers from Knowles and earlier in place. So, a bunch of Democrats got some high wage years on their retirement, but the Republicans didn’t get any experienced government operatives. I’m sure She extracted a promise from Parnell to keep all her appointees for at least the rest of the term. We’ll see if after he’s elected on his own, Parnell will actually put a Republican administration in place. ‘Course, if he runs off any of Her buddies, he runs the risk of the dreaded Tweet and incurring the wrath of all the Lower 48 Palinbots.

  • Mary Beth

    Or am I reading awesome scifi geekiness in your post because I’m…well, a geek?

  • mbecker908

    the House and Senate. “Republicans” might.

    Impeachment? Absollutely not. Beat them on the issues, issue by issue, impeachment will simply turn into a personality contest as it did with Clinton, and we’ll lose big time and we will not have won the issues either.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Look at the title of Erick’s post. :)

  • Achance

    I just couldn’t get that far into dumb. Impeachment? How’d that work out the last time?

    If there were any Republicans that knew anything about running a government, we could declare war on Democrat front groups if we had the House back. All we’d have to do is stop feeding the hand that bites us when we fund all the non-profts with grants and contracts. We can also make Comrade Obama’s life a living Hell by really, really stepping on the appointee level expenditures in his budgets; he won’t be taking ten vacations a year if he doesn’t have gas for AF-1! Take a machete to budgets in the places that hurt appointees and front groups. But, then, you have to actually know where those places are; something Republcans can’t seem to grasp.

  • Mary Beth
  • mbecker908
  • Oz

    I’ve been working on the same novel for five years and I’m getting tired of it.

    Wish I could write something useful like the book you are working on.

  • Richard Mullins

    US Constitution for Dummies and the Federalist Papers in Paperback. That should help that wondering mind to stop following you for a while. There were a lot of good books at Borders, but I tried to keep my cost down. Maybe I should send them to a leftist, it might make their head spin.

    P.S. There were a few paperback reprints of Rules for Radicals but I really don’t need it when I have a former radical here.

    Also, someone must hate the name Mukowski more than Alaskans hate the name Palin.

  • spainishirish

    nothing more than humiliate the opposition, not a bad thing from a strict PR standpoint. There even could be a few substantive ones that result in stimulus audits that could put the Spanish Inquisition to shame.

    Art also made good suggestions about targeted non-profit/communist-front and executive level-appointee defunding. As much as it sickens me, there were GOP MoC’s who helped fund ACORN, for God’s sake. Lesson leared there? I think so and this next Congress, if the election goes as expected, can prove it.

    Why impeach a gift? Becker is right. The only way to rehabilitate Obama would be impeachment. No, investigate him endlessly and bring out how much blatant graft he encouraged. Let us recall that this time last year we were talking about how many seats the GOP might lose. Hubris and over-reach only can get you as far as the Democrats got with two congresses.

    A majority Republican congress will be a coalition from the center to the right, but that is such an improvement it doesn’t need to be acknowledged.

  • Achance

    Erick hooked me up with an agent but nothing much has happened yet. No publisher of note will accept a manuscript directly from an author unless that author is really famous, e.g., Palin, so you pretty much have to have an agent. That’s especially true if you’re on the dark side of the moon or in Alaska. Hell, the only thing anybody in NYC knows about Alaska is “that woman” lives there. One thing I’ve learned; agents, editors, and publishers HATE writers unless you have some sort of in; it is a real friend of a friend business.

    I have a novel I’ve been working on as well. It started out as a training exercise for my staff back when I was still working. It was based on the rape allegations against an Alaska State Trooper and was written to be an exercise in moral and evidentiary ambiguity. Fortunately, the Trooper took a plea and I didn’t have to go sustain his dismissal in an arbitration because it was all he said-she said. Anyway, I’ve been working on redeeming a couple of my characters because though it was pretty real-world, I think it was too dark for most people. I think I can sell that one to at least one of the regional publishers and see how it goes from there. I wrote it long before Palin burst on the scene but I had a woman governor and all sorts of Trooper intrigue in it already. Maybe I’m prescient.

  • aesthete

    Economically, state capitalism based on (similar

  • aesthete

    From what I understand, AK is socially libertarian, but its economy is somewhere between that of the European oil state economies (like the Netherlands and some of the Baltic countries), and the traditional US model. IOW, it’s probably as libertarian as an inhospitable polity with some precious resource is going to be on a practical level.

  • Achance

    have intensely hated Frank Murkowski since ’80, maybe before. In ’80, Mike Gravel (D-Alaska) had run afoul of the Democrats’ biggest money man, Barney Gottstein, over his vote to sell F-15s to Saudi Arabia. Barney was Jewish and staunchly pro-Israel. So, Mike gets a well funded primary challenge from Clark Gruening, the grandson of former Territorial Governor and US Senator, Ernest Gruening. The Gruenings are Alaska Democrat nobility. Clark beat Mike in the Primary, but Frank beat Clark in the General and the Democrats and the ADN have had their panties in a wad ever since.

    The ADN viscerally hates Frank Murkowski. If we did anything good in the Murkowski Administration, they ignored it. If we did anything they could characterize as bad, it was front page above the fold. The bad press was unrelenting from the minute Frank took his hand off The Bible. I’m not going to blame the ADN for our ignominious demise, but they sure did their part. Fundamentally, we never recovered from his appointment of Lisa; it guided everything we did for the first two years. In my balliwick, every labor relations decision was predicated on keeping those unions under contract and out of politics until after the ’04 election.

    The People of Alaska simply recoiled from Frank’s appointment of Lisa and passed by initiative legislation removing the Governor’s power to appoint to fill a Senate vacancy. I don’t know that Lisa would have won in ’04 if Ted and Don hadn’t thrown all in to get her re-elected. Since then, she has worked very hard at constituent relations and is probably the most popular sitting politician in the State, or at least she was until Miller and Palin started trashing her. Sen. Murkowski had centerstage at the Sen. Stevens funeral service and was very sincere and Senatorial. Since pretty much everybody in Alaska watched that, I think that served her well.

    I don’t know that Frank and Ted had that good a relationship, but Lisa and Ted seem to have had a very good relationship. Neither Frank nor Ted are/were easy guys to get along with; Ted had an “in your face” prosecutorial manner that unless you were as tough as he was could be very off-putting, Frank is a big, domineering guy and you WILL notice that he is in the room. I never knew Ted Stevens at any personal level; we said hello and knew each other’s name. I worked with/for Frank and he and I got along pretty well but only after I established that I could be just as big an a$$hole as he could. Being a successor to an icon ain’;t easy for anyone. Frank didn’t have Ted’s stature but he had a lot of stature, so filling his shoes wasn’t easy for Lisa. Ted definitely took her under his wing and was her mentor. She profitted from the experience.

  • Achance

    There’s a lot more bars and whorehouses than churches, but the churchy parts are pretty churchy. The economy is pure centrally planned socialism. When I headed Alaska’s labor relations, I had far, far more power over the Alaska economy than any of those Anchorage captains of industry and really onlly the guys in London and Riiyad had more power.

  • Raven

    Every Alaskan I know hates Murkwski. Even (or is it, especially?) those who worked for him, though some former Murkowski employees do write good stuff about him in the paper. 2 or 3 even. Knowles is about 50/50.

  • Raven

    Sen Murkowski gets lukewarm support except when someone else is running against her in the primary. She’s not loved, but she’s not hated.

  • Raven

    Try Alaska. And roughly 40% of that state is directly on the Dole and most of the rest is more in line with Dr No than Sen DeMint. It’s a somewhat tougher fight.

  • IJB

    Thanks Art!

  • Raven

    It’s not really feasible to build, let alone Maintain roads to even the “major” cities. It’s hard and expensive enough maintaining those roads you mentioned.

  • Raven

    They know that, too, judging from SNL.

  • Achance

    Come join me for the returns at the Red Dog in JNU tonight and I’ll introduce you to LOTS of people who despise Sarah Palin.

  • Raven

    I spend my time in Anchorage. I go mostly to visit the folks.
    My knowledge of Alaskans comes from time IN Alaska, not on here.
    I haven’t posted much lately, so maybe you forgot that about me.

    Oh, and the dog show circuit folks all love Palin. The ones who don’t love Knowles, anyway. Though some love both.

  • Raven

    I would like to run down to Juneau to meet you in person some time. But the only way I can afford to go at all, really, is that I stay at my parents’ place in Bear Valley.

  • calgacus

    what are the odds that he wins the general election?

  • Section9

    Back in 2002, if I recall correctly (from an old post of Art’s back in the spring), he mentioned that he and a group of other Republican advisors and mid-level people told Frank that it wouldn’t be in his or the Party’s best long term interests to pick Lisa as the state’s Senator.

    So while I disagree with Art about Palin, he’s always been his own man, not a Frank stooge.

    Frank has enough stooges. I’m not sure that it has helped him, as Joe Miller may have pulled it off tonight.

  • Section9

    Even in Alaska, your power did have limits.

  • audax

    State of Alaska 2010 Primary Election
    August 24, 2010
    Unofficial Results 08/25/10
    03:56:12

    US SENATOR (R) REP
    Total
    Number of Precincts 438
    Precincts Reporting 429 97.9 %
    Times Counted 90618/487456 18.6 %
    Total Votes 89858

    Miller, Joe REP 45909 51.09%
    Murkowski, Lisa REP 43949 48.91%

  • SIConservative

    With all but nine precincts reporting, Miller leads by 1960 votes, or 2.18%. The caveat here, though, is that more than 16,000 absentee ballots were mailed out, and they won’t be counted until Aug. 31. The good thing is that the Democrats just nominated a sacrificial lamb, so even if this is dragged out, it really doesn’t matter.

  • audax

    Precincts Reporting 429 of 438 (97.9 %)
    Total Votes 89858

    Miller, Joe 45,909 (51.09%)
    Murkowski, Lisa 43,949 (48.91%)

  • SIConservative

    See my comment below

  • audax

    …haven’t done math but Lisa M. would need a HUGE chunk of those to win. Can you imagine what would be going on today of the numbers were reversed? The calls for Miller to concede and unite behind the winner would be deafening. Too bad tha it is only a one way street when it comes to the “R” acrynom whose name we should never mention on this site. Conservative’s -noun have a long way to go with the Precinct Committeeman project to marginalize “them” in the GOP.

  • SIConservative

    I hope Miller pulled it off, but there’s a big difference here. Murkowski led through the entire campaign. Miller closed extremely strong, but did he close before or after the bulk those absentee ballots were voted? Further, might those voting absentee be less likely to have heard Miller’s message in the closing weeks? I thought before the counting that Miller would’ve conceded by now, so things look much better than expected. Even so, this is a long, long way from over.

  • audax

    SirGladiator Wednesday, August 25th at 8:27AM EDT (link)
    Joe Miller has pulled off quite the shocker! This is a huge victory for Sarah Palin, the Tea Party, Conservatism, and of course all of America! Now all that?s left is for Murkowski to do what the Conservative candidates in Georgia and Wyoming recently did when actually trailing by less than one percentage point (Murkowski is currently down by more than two percentage points), and that is to concede instead of asking for a recount or absentees or whatever. Will Murkowski be the Team Player that the Conservative candidates were, when faced with much closer races than this one? Or will she ask for a recount, and overseas absentees, etc etc and drag this out for weeks? Here?s hoping that Murkowski will do what?s right for the Republican Party, and all the people of America, and publicly congratulate Joe Miller on this fantastic and exciting victory!

  • audax

    …it could be over today! Then we can all throw our support behind Miller and start campaigning for November…..but….but….I doubt that the “R” acronym that dare not be mentioned at this site without fear of banning will do such a thing….now that would be the “Sleeper” in Alaska if she did! Not holding my breath…..

  • Raven

    Include an awful lot of military who like Palin and know Palin backed Miller.

  • Raven

    That those who love Palin just slightly outnumber those who hate her, even in Alaska. You should spend a little more time in Anchorage and Mat-Su maybe, Art. You might just perhaps be suffering from beltway syndrome with all your time in the Juneau area…

    I won’t suggest that you’ll learn to love Palin, but as you know better than I, half the state lives in or around Anchorage, and from what you write, you would seem to have little contact with them.

  • mboyle1988

    That’s so stupid. Florida and Texas do the right thing and require absentees to get to the election office by 5PM on election day, and then they count them first and release them when the regular polls close. Miller is going to come out of this with about a 2k vote lead. That means Murkowski is going to need to win 56% of absentees (assuming they all voted) to win it. That’s definitely possible. Crap.

  • texasgalt

    Looks like there are a lot of strong tea drinkers up north.

  • SIConservative

    Let’s move the entire discussion over there.

  • http://www.2010blog.net jsanzone

    Erick, you’re really in tune.

  • barleycorn

    I hope Miller wins but lets count all the votes first. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a candidate waiting till all votes are counted before conceding.