« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Conservatives Have Won Nothing. You Read It Right. NOTHING.

It has come to this, I’m afraid.

We need to keep our perspective.

Conservatives have won nothing. Nothing.

Ken Buck you say? Sharron Angle? Mike Lee? Pat Toomey? Marco Rubio? Joe Miller? Rand Paul? Nikki Haley?

Here, pay attention: they are all candidates.

Yes, yes — we won primaries. Contrary to popular opinion that conservatives wanted a purge of party, we instead played smartly — playing where we could win. We gave Roy Blunt a pass in Missouri. We were largely disunified and unorganized in Illinois, letting it go to Mark Kirk. I personally insisted no one beat him up on the front page here, given the near inevitability of the primary. There was no point. We stayed out of Connecticut. We went with Rob Portman in Ohio. We lost California and Indiana.

We won Colorado.

We won Nevada.

We won Alaska.

We won Kentucky.

We won Utah.

We won Florida.

We won South Carolina.

Except we really haven’t. There is a huge difference between winning a primary and winning an actually election. One gives you the name “nominee.” The other gives you the name Senator, Congressman, and Governor. It is the latter that is important.

A lot of conservatives want to go pounding their fists on their chests, declare themselves Tarzan of the Jungle, and pronounce their great victories. But we have, ultimately, won nothing.

Nothing, that is, yet. There are feuds breaking out. There are some conservatives who have decided to sit on the sidelines because their candidate did not win. There are some moderates who have decided to sit on the sidelines because their candidate did not win.

As I have said from Day One of my arrival at RedState, here we are conservative in the primary and Republican in the general election. Now is the time to mobilize and fight to take back the country from the Democrats. There is only one vehicle by which we can do that — the Republican Party.

Don’t get cocky. Don’t get overconfident. Don’t decide you’ve done all you need or want to do. Victory is ours, but we must fight for it all the way to November.

COMMENTS

  • audax
  • epaulzy

    My other fear is that Republicans (not conservatives) take over control of the house and senate and then guys like John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and the other other moderate Republicans take over the chairmanships of various committees. In my estimation that leaves the country in the same situation as we’re currently in with the liberals in charge. If this happens then new young blood needs to be in positions of power. People like Ryan, King, Bachmann, Spence, Cantor, and others.

    My question then is how do we make that happen when we have no say in the selection process?

  • The Moat

    NJ? VA? MA?

  • stephaniet

    Aye aye! It was that “conservative in the primary, Republican in general” attitude of yours that made me put everything in perspective and not get upset after “my guy” didn’t win the nomination in the Indiana primary. I will say one thing for the primaries, though: they’re really scaring the Dems and libtards. :D

  • ywhyvon1

    that www.40weeks.com and find out what you can do.

    Once there and if you find that for your zip code there is no info you might want to consider offering your time to supply info for your area candidate.

    This election is not a given. We have less than 63 days because many state’s early voting rules decide the elction before Nov 2.

    BATTLE STATIONS BATTLE STATIONS

    We don’t even know, can’t even imagine what kinda tricks the criminal progressives have planned but already, In AZ I believe, the voting machines have been mysteriously set on fire!

    Even if you are in a “safe” area. We need to get the numbers of republican voters up an out. We need to be a force to be reckoned with!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The third was a special and not really of this cycle.

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    Clearly I’m talking 2010.

  • NeoKong

    80% of what you want is better than 50% .
    It’s that simple.
    Awhile back we were even wondering if Rubio could win the primary as the NRSC was supporting Crist and now it looks like he will be the next Senator from Fla.
    While it is true that Chuck Devore did not win in California but having Carly Fiorina take the seat from Boxer would be quite a stunning upset and much better than not winning.
    Look at it this way.
    What would be better…?
    Jim DeMint as Senate leader or Chuck Schumer….?
    It’s time to join the winning team and come in for the big win.

  • ywhyvon1

    and where the “REAL WORK” begins. That’s keeping ourselves and enough other usually non alert citizens to keep the eye on our officials and to keep their fett to the fire.

    Also, we all know that after(if) the repubs take back 1 or both branches of the house that life is NOT going to miraculously become Hunky Dory. We have too many huge problems for that to happen. We need to focus on a realistic plan and also a verbal platform to use to keep making the point that we need to stay the course.

    After all, we can’t keep pummeling “the other guy” fr 19 months and expect that to give us any credibility.

    That said, I understand your FEAR, but enough with that cry baby stuff. We need to pull ourselves up and decide how to procede no matter how the 2010 election shake out

  • ywhyvon1

    After Handel lost here in GA and Deal is our Republican candidate now, I realize I would rather have Deal over Barnes

    No use crying over spilt milk. Gotta make do with what you got.

  • ywhyvon1
  • ffleonard

    I’m getting a lot of heat because I stand up for my conservative beliefs to include personal attacks on my wife that the Foster’s Daily Democrat says are OK…I’m standing up to the “moderates” within the Rochester City Republican Committee and the Strafford County Republican Committee and I’m labeled a bully and an extremist by them and other real conservatives sit back and do nothing…this post is absolutely correct…we have won NOTHING…not all Republicans are the same and the moderates have destroyed the GOP brand and have given far more ammunition to the Dems than those of us fighting to take our party back…allowing “moderates” to rule the roost gets us no where…

  • peterfny

    I argue this point a lot with my staunch Conservative fiends that there is no point in cutting your nose off to spite your face. When Conservatives and Republicans stay home to “send a message” we get what we got in the last election. Do we want that to happen again…? HELL NO.

    More than any other in recent history, this is a “big picture” election coming up. Republicans need to win and win BIG to send a message that the aberration is over and the market correction is about to be issued with a swift kick. Once that goal has been successfully accomplished, it’s time to roll up the sleeves again and get to work on 2012.

    This is a new, big, bold time. I’ve NEVER seen so many people ready, willing and able to get involved (which means you KNOW people are PO’d).The “big bag o’ dirty tricks” is guaranteed to get played so we have to stay diligent. Once the main goal is achieved, then by all means start leaning on your reps to represent YOU. They can’t ignore the message if the message is said loud enough.

  • johnconradarens

    In a macro-sense, though, we’ve won a very grand victory: The victory of Individual Freedom as expressed through Mercantile Capitalism versus Collective Marxist Statism. When even the Bull Moose of Statism, President Obama, must couch his rhetoric in terms of Individual Heft, entrepreneurism, and spending restraint (-even if his actual deeds manifestly deny his rhetoric), then we know the intellectual argument has been won.

    The old rust-bucket of soviet-style collectivism has finally run out of gas. No matter how many times dinosaurs like James Carville and Howard Dean may proclaim a 40-year Liberal ascendancy, no amount of boosterism will raise this corpse of a world-view to life.

    Pragmatically, of course, Eric, you are correct. No actual, governing power has been wrested away quite yet. But, the fact that even the most sclerotic liberal must talk like a Ronald Reagan conservative should give us calm strength to gird our loins for the battle in 60-some days, and the greater war to be won in two years.

    And I thank you for so much of the heavy lifting.

  • Richard Mullins

    and every thing to do with expectant mothers and babies. Maybe you meant, 40weeks.org or something because the site you linked isn’t what you think.

  • SIConservative

    As Oz pointed out in his promoted diary, we can’t win in November. Elections are like trying out for the US Olympic team. You can’t win anything in the trials; you can only get the chance to do so. In the States, if you don’t medal, the only people who give a damn that you made it are your family and friends. Unless and until we start winning legislative battles, not giving it the old college try, not coming close, not getting more of what we want, and not just stopping the bleeding, but actually changing the government, we won’t have won anything.

  • trapperjohn

    In the states where conservatives upset moderates it’s time for the moderates to get on board.

    I worked hard for Murkowski in the last campaign to make sure she beat Tony Knowles. I pulled in a lot of my conservative friends who were tempted to vote 3rd party with the argument that she certainly would have a better chance of supporting Bush’s court appointments than would Knowles.

    Now it’s time for the moderates to not only “hold their noses” and vote for the conservatives, but to also work to bring in their fellow moderates.

    In states where moderates won, we conservatives need to get on board for the good of the whole. If we don’t win back the house in November we will have done nothing. We also have a chance to win the senate with people like Carly in CA.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    and the absolute truth.

    we need to hear it and up the commitment level …

    .. surpass that of those socialists and commies.

    Anyone who thinks they’re not involved and playing for keeps, reread the post. We’ve got our work cut out for us.

  • america1st

    can never rest. We must stand post until relieved. A few days leave here and there, but then back to the front lines. For our enemies, domestic and foreign, will always be out there. From Benedict Arnold to Barrack Hussein el-Babbler, their names change, but not their core agenda of destroying America.

  • renny

    Fiorna and MacMahon offer fiscal conservatism should they win their seats.

    In politics, as in the song, you can’t always get what you want, but sometimes you get what you need.

    We need a Republican majority to take the leadership positions, get the extra staffing, and change Congressional culture.

    I just posted a short diary on how with continued spending, we will make Greece look like a Lador Day parade soon.

    Say what you will about McCain, he has always been a fiscal conservative. He has never taken an earmark. He has always supported the military (and has extensively knowledge there that too many elected reps. did not have).

    If the candidates supported win, a significant conservative caucus can be devekoped in both house, or join with Bachman’s tea party caucus.

    But as to winning, the campaign is never over. And if Reps. are a majority, we have to watch for no back sliding that they did under Bush II, where they became too complacent and became afflicted with too much DC-itis.

  • peterfny

    Exactly. Grandstanding to make a “point” that only ends up harming the greater good is worthless. A bunch of sound and fury signifying nothing, as the great bard once said.

  • howardbeale

    This takes me back to the days of playing in basketball tournaments. Winning the quarterfinals doesn’t mean squat.

    The other point I have to agree with is that we have to be supportive, even if our candidate did not win in the primaries. This is especially true in CA.

    I would have preferred Chuck Devore over Carly Fiorina, but Fiorina will be a huge improvement over Barbara Boxer.

    I’m less than thrilled about the choices for governor. Meg Whitman is probably no improvement over Arnold. I like Chelene Nightingale, but a vote for her would help the Democrats. For now, have to focus on keeping the former in ‘Former Gov. Moonbeam’.

  • rdelbov

    people give me an okay to say this thought on this thread?

    This November its Obama/Pelosi/Reid against the republicans. Period. Need of story. If you vote for a republican you advance the cause–if you vote for Pelosi/obama/Reid/Democrat you advance their cause.

    So Didier should endorse Rossi

    Hayworth should endorse McCain

    McCollum should endorse Scott

    Murkowski should endorse Miller

    Trancredo needs to drop out.

    Its Obama and his crowd on one side-we are the other side.

    Time to unify. I put an extra burden on candidates as the party faithful have worked years and years to register people to vote-build a core of volunteers -we have given time and money to build the party. We provide the framework to elect you. When you lose a primary our efforts can be wasted if pout because your personal ambitions did not get fullfilled. So support the cause.

  • chihank

    I’ll go out and say Michael Steele is good for conservatives.

    With Steele’s unorganized leadership as RNC Chair, establishment candidates don’t have the infrastructure needed to hold off insurgent Tea Party candidates.

  • aesthete
  • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

    .

  • Richard Mullins

    and I hope that http://www.40seats.com has been updated some. My Parents live a competitive district in TX-23. Quico Canseco getting my vote if I was still in District since I’m on a ABC(Anyone but Ciro) kick since 1997. The district I live in now is super safe Republican.

  • sallyw

    I just got an email from my Mom, in Colorado. They’re already furious with Buck.
    “Well, our Tea Party candidate won, but now he’s on a kick to change the constitution to have Senators selected instead of elected…this guy’s a kook!”

    So my question is, exactly HOW do we hold their feet to the fire?? Don’t tell me we vote them out in 2 years, we need solutions to hold their ear to hear the voice of We The People. They’ve been so politically trained to reach their goals, at all costs, once they get in office they shut off their phones, shut down their email and carry on politics as usual? Solutions??

  • bobojake

    There are millions of Conservative American Citizen/taxpayer/voter that are engaged like they have never been before and I do not believe the majority of them will stop after NOV 2nd. For the last 40 years many of us TRUSTED our politicians to be working for the best the INTEREST of the UNITED STATES while joined the Service got out went to College or tooka a job and we worked hard at our jobs and supported our families.
    Unfortunate during those 40 years Marxist-Socialst-Communist-Progressives captured the Democrat Party and snagged a few Rhinos and Dam near destroyed the United States.
    We have won the motivation to not let that ever ever ever happen to this GREAT NATION. NO MORE APOLOGY TOURS.
    See you obama crats on NOV 2nd for the politically ash kickin you have had coming for over 49 yrears by the most motivated voters in our history.

  • rdelbov

    does not support repealing the 17th amendment. You can tell your mom that.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister
  • deano64

    that’s the Dems job.

  • Ghost of John Brown

    A very wise man told me years ago – “movements start in caves and die in cathedrals”, meaning that once you get a little bit full of yourself and start looking to congratulate yourself, you are ready to have your movement die.

    Hopefully, we will be willing to stay in “the cave” for a long time to come. Keep working everyone. Don’t be satisfied.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    There is a long ways to go between now and November. It is the longest time of the year for some. For others it just means longer breaks during a football game (or whatever’s on) when the attack adds start running…

    Expecting:
    Smear campaigns by the press in addition to those directly by the dems. (normal) Be *nice* to see the press start *investigating* or debunking outrageous claims… but then it’s be *nice* to see the press not in the tank for dems…

    Sudden large infusions of dubious funds for dem candidates war chests for those lagging behind in the polls. (normal)

    Cheating on a massive scale by/for the dems under the expectation that the O will dismiss investigations against dems for cheating.

    All sorts of other hijinx and shenanigans! (cheating expected but the scale may be surprising given how badly they dems are behind in current pollls-desperation often leads to *bad* decisions for those without a decent moral compass)

    It would be *nice* to see the sore losers on the R side not try to trip up or backstab the nominated candidates but hey, there’s a reason they are are not the candidates now isn’t there?

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    n/t

  • mboyle1988

    Could someone pretty please explain to me how in HELL Carly Fiorina is a moderate? She’s the most conservative senate candidate in California since I’ve been alive (1988) as far as I can tell.

  • SIConservative

    There is a very strong case to be made for repeal of the Amendment. Legislative election of Senators provided a powerful check on the power of the federal government. As is only now coming to light, states have been reluctant to reassert their rightful power in matters that were not enumerated in Article 1 Section 8, matters which are thus delegated to them by the Tenth Amendment. Returning to legislative election would mean that state legislatures could appoint Senators who would allow state governments to do their jobs rather than usurp power due on the wings of popular whim rather than legal right.

    To be sure, there are counter-arguments, and I really haven’t given the issue enough thought to take a firm stand one way or the other, but the idea is certainly worthy of serious discussion.

  • The_Rebel

    “Now is the time to mobilize and fight to take back the country from the Democrats. There is only one vehicle by which we can do that ? the Republican Party.”

    That means no Libertarian or third-party candidates, nor promotion of same.

    Maybe I missed it with all of the Alaskan hoopla over the last several days, but has Achance stated whether he will support Miller now in the general? After all, even Ronald Reagan put aside the vicious “voodoo economics” campaign waged by George H.W. Bush and asked him to be his vice president.

  • conservvoter

    . . . that was my first response.

    But, quite frankly, it worries me that you have to remind Repubs/conservatives that we still have a looong way to go.

  • IJB

    …Is only worth talking about if Gov’s do the appointing (or if, better, Gov’s (or Lt. Gov’s) actually had to *serve* as Senators).

    But if we’re talking about having State Legislatures do the appointing, it’s a non-starter – *that* would be an absolute disaster.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    I’d go with just about anybody the media trashes.

    /sarcasm

  • lineholder

    He’s made a lot of comments the last few days, some of which have resulted in his digging himself into a hole. How many of them he genuinely meant is hard to say. Time will tell on that point.

  • SIConservative

    Why do you think so?

  • Richard Mullins

    voting against guy on a few issues that you might not agree with isn’t the way to go. I’d vote for him in CO simply because he’s not Bennet and that’s all that matters. At times, selection of Senators has gotten some better ones but until a few legislature’s clean up, I’m not pro 17 amendment repeal. That doesn’t mean I’d against one that is.

  • rdelbov

    Buck and many here would no problem with direct election of senators in case of vacanies.

    Obamacare was passed with the votes of Kaufman-Bennet-Burris-Gillibrand-Kirk who were not elected at all. Now that’s an amendment I could get behind. Actually that’s a state matter and several states have that provision

  • cwilson

    Steele is a Conservative sleeper agent! It all makes sense now…

  • trapperjohn

    I should not have used her as an example. It’s just that many/most on Redstate were backing someone else and need to jump on her wagon.

  • Richard Mullins

    I want to have some state legislatures cleaned up first before we do it. In those days, produced some great statesmen, like Henry Clay and to a point in his Senate career, Sam Houston. Our founding fathers had much right, and this part of it.

  • trapperjohn

    I believe he has said several times that he will vote for Miller if he wins. But he didn’t expect him to win.

    What we need is more of the republican leaders to not only vote for the candidate who wins the nomination but to endorse them as the best choice in the general election.

  • AKSteveB

    Wondering what you are thinking in terms of Parnell. Berkowitz seems more realistic on ACES/AGIA than Parnell, but of course Berkowitz is worse on everything else.

  • AKSteveB

    Wondering what you are thinking in terms of Parnell. Berkowitz seems more realistic on ACES/AGIA than Parnell, but of course Berkowitz is worse on everything else.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    If your state hasn’t had its primary yet, please help the campaigns of “your” candidates to GOTV. Contact the campaign. Ask how best you can help them. If your candidates are Republicans who will win easily without your help, please seek out the campaigns of other Republicans who have a fight on their hands. You can probably find one that needs help with phone calls. Most campaigns have web-based phone bank systems. For example: http://christine2010.com/get-involved/

    After the primary, please get involved with the campaigns of the Republican primary winners that have a fight on their hands.

    If we all sit back and rely on “the other guy” to walk the precincts and make the phone calls, etc., or the RNC, NRCC and NRSC to save the day through advertising alone, we may have a very rude awakening on Nov. 3.

    Here’s an example of what we’re up against (from Organizing for America’s YouTube channel):

    For Liberty,
    ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW! (62 days until Nov. 2 — what are YOU DOING to help get out the vote in your precinct?)

  • deano64

    to appoint we would have Benet guaranteed another 6 years. How is that good?

  • SIConservative
  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister
  • AKSteveB

    I just installed Firefox. Could one of the moderators get rid of my duplicate. Thanks.

  • Richard Mullins

    It would be different that what we have and what we will have in the future. It’s going to take some time to clean it up and after it’s done, I’m ok with a 17th amendment repeal. CO is one many legislatures that needs to be cleaned up first.

  • calgacus

    Scott Brown is not very conservative and Governor’s races have much less effect than do Senate races (although as a VA resident, I am glad to be gone of Kaine).

  • Fla Mom

    Maybe one day, if the next revolution doesn’t happen first.

    And for those whose argument is, “But the outcome might not be what I want in one election cycle,”… oh, never mind.

    Fla Mom

  • IJB

    There was a reason the 17th Amendment passed in the first place – it didn’t spring fully-formed into thin air like Athena.

    The fact is, the Senate has *never* functioned as the Founders intended (i.e. as the body representing the “States’” interests), and it’s going to take more than undoing the 17th to fix that (assuming it’s even truly fixable, of which I have my doubts…).

  • Oz

    It will take at least FIVE elections with this concerted effort.

    2010 — wrest control of the house and a bit of the Senate.
    2012 — elect a strong, fiscal, small government President and take control of the Senate.
    2014, 2016, 2018 — Primary moderate Republicans from conservative states / districts and replace them with conservatives.

    2016 — Re-elect or primary the person we elect in 2012 depending on how they govern.

    2010 to 2020 — Hold their toes to the fire once they get in.

  • IJB

    Many (most?…) State Legislatures will always be a cesspool of mediocrity and corruption (and they’re worse than that when D’s are heavily in charge…), so anyone believing that having State Legislatures picking Senators is going to magically “save” this country is seeing Pink Elephants.

    Frankly, it’d be really cool if we could make random boulders “fly”, but that’s not likely to happen either… :|

  • Oz

    Brown is conservative for MA and Christie for NJ but neither are conservative (at least socially).

    The VA governor is but again he was elected while pushing fiscal conservative principles.

  • Achance

    Except for voting for Gov. Hickel who though a Republican, Mr. Republican in Alaska, ran in ’90 on the AIP ticket. What else I do depends on who asks me and what I’m asked to do. It will be interesting to see if the Miller Campaign acknowledges the existence of Southeast and Rural Alaska, Palin barely did, and it shows in that district map that the ADN has and which I linked in a couple of places. Other than Anchorage proper, Miller carried all the places accessible by road and Murkowski carried all the places accessible only by air or water.

    As to Republican luminaries in Alaska coming out for him, some will dutifully do that, but here is where the price of the Palin association gets paid. Don Young I’m sure remembers Palin and her pals backing Parnell’s run against him last time. There are lots of legislators and former legislators who could help Miller, but a lot of them wouldn’t give Palin air if she were in a jug. There’s something about somebody carrying their political career on telling the whole Country that you’re corrupt and that she’s the one that cleaned up Alaska. Parnell barely got a majority in the Republican Primary and has his own problems if Bill Walker does a union financed write in campaign – and they have the money and organization to do it; won’t elect Walker, but might elect Jerkowitz.

    Maybe they’ve done the math and have figured out how to win a statewide election without carrying any Southeast or Rural Alaska districts. Maybe all they were doing is appealing to the people they see and talk to every day in the Railbelt and roaded areas of the State. There are several fairly influential Republican legislators here in Southeast; Bert Stedman of Sitka is co-chair of the Senate Finance Committee. Sarah went out of her way to antagonize him and took a huge number of her line item cuts that she so liked to brag about out of his district specifically and Southeast generally. If I were Joe Miller, a call to Bert Stedman would be very high on my to-do list. Bert’s Senate district is also the home of the current Democrat nominee for US Senate. District 4, my district is a big district that votes; Murkowski carried it and as with the rest of Juneau, there is no love here for Sarah Palin. Cathy Munoz is the Republican Representative of District 4, and she ought to be right up there with Bert Stedman on Miller’s to-do list. Kyle Johansen (R-Ketchikan) might want to have a discussion of Sarah’s bragadocio about rejecting the money for the “bridge to nowhere” when in fact she took the money and just spent it elsewhere. You should see the beautiful new cloverleaf at the intersection of the Parks and Glenn that takes you to Wasilla. Ketchikan is the Murkowski family’s home town Memories, memories. There is going to be a lot of sympathy in Southeast to vote for McAdams, someone also from Southeast.

    So, I think there will be dutiful support and most Alaskans, even the NPs, are not disposed to vote for a Democrat usually, but they have in the past if they were upset with the Republican (Begich over Stevens) or the Democrat had a resonant message and the ticket was split (Knowles over Campbell and Coghill). Were I advising Mr. Miller, I would advise him to get on the phone and be humble to a bunch of people that he needs more than they need him. There are a lot of Republican legislators in areas that Murkowski carried that can do things for Joe Miller. There’s not much he can do either to or for them.

  • eburke

    I supported Handel as well with dollars and GOTV efforts.

    But Deal vs Barnes?

    That’s *still* a no-brainer, ‘specially since redistricting hangs in the balance this cycle.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    who’s this Oz? I’ve never seen him.

    *pointing to comment below*

    “Only one of those three is really a conservative .. Brown is conservative for MA and Christie for NJ but neither are conservative (at least socially).”

    *still whispering*

    He’s so sharp and I want to learn more. where’s his facebook? Does he have twitter? I want in! Does he have a site? I’m so sorry I’m so clueless!

  • SIConservative

    It’s fair to say that they weren’t right about everything, but that in and of itself isn’t a reason to oppose repeal. What reasons do you have?

  • eburke

    would immediately double the average IQ of the Dem caucus in the Senate.

    Carly’s certainly not everything I would want in a candidate but any Republican or conservative who votes for a 3rd party candidate just to pitch a fit, or who stays at home so they can feel ‘morally superior’ when we have a realistic shot at getting rid one of the truly disgusting (and stupid) members of the Senate, and very likely it’s leading advocate of infanticide and abortion, is out of their ever-loving minds.

  • eburke

    but they are both light-years better (especially Fiorina) than the libtard Dems they’re running against. I don’t expect Jim DeMint in CA or CT. Just someone who’s with us on the biggies.

    It is every bit as important for us to support them as it is to support Buck/Rubio/Toomey, et al.

  • eburke

    but they are both light-years better (especially Fiorina) than the libtard Dems they’re running against. I don’t expect Jim DeMint in CA or CT. Just someone who’s with us on the biggies.

    It is every bit as important for us to support them as it is to support Buck/Rubio/Toomey, et al.

  • http://jeffmericle.com Jeff Mericle

    They just might, but I think Fiorina will vote the proper way when it comes to judicial nominees and spending. Being a Californian, I am encouraged the Fiorina is competitive; we have not had that situation for quite some time. I volunteered for the campaign, so hopefully they will give me a ring real soon to help out with phone calls, etc because we are so tired of Senator “Don’t Call Me Ma’am” Boxer.

  • NeoKong

    We shouldn’t focus so much on who wins as much as who loses.
    I would take Richard Simmons over Barbara Boxer.
    If Fiorina wins we get two things.
    The first obviously is the seat goes red and adds to the Senate score card.
    The second is Boxer is fired and that is sho’ gonna’ hurt the lefties.
    Carly may not be Chuck but she won’t be all that bad.
    I want her to win.

  • SIConservative

    Whether it’s good policy to have Senators elected by state legislatures is entirely independent of what the short-term outcome would be.

  • The_Rebel

    and glad to see that you feel Miller will get reasonable support from most Alaskans. I think he should heed your advice about being humble to certain Republican legislators. And perhaps he does need you as an advisor, since it it never smart to surround yourself with yes people. Part of my job is to play the devil’s advocate, and it wouldn’t hurt Miller to have someone like that advising his campaign.

  • ywhyvon1
  • deano64
  • ywhyvon1

    And people like Glen Beck, and even more importantly, to me, all the really fantastic writers and commentators on Redstate have really helped to make that possible.

    Thanks Y’all. Thanks for all you do.

  • audax
  • audax

    ….and that will bring an even bigger “next election cycle” for the message they ignored…God bless ‘em! I’m begginning to think the National GOP aren’t the only ones who rarely miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity

  • audax
  • audax
  • audax

    …i.e. Crap and Tax,

  • qixlqatl

    Been using it successfully for a couple of years

  • Doc Holliday

    I have used firefox for some time and have found it much better than IE, including faster. I have had some problems recently, I think it is related to the add ons. I have also tried Chrome, but I just don’t trust Google.

  • audax

    ….that it puts a lot more importance on electing “good/better” State Legistators who make “good/better” choices on who they nominate/appoint to the U.S. Senate. This would make who controls State Legisltures nationally, more important every election cycle, rather than just each10 years for redistricting.

  • sallyw

    Deano64, if you have valuable facts that I can share with my mom, please put it up here without calling me a liar. I live in Missouri and I am a Patriot Activist in my own state. My family lives in Colorado. They voted for Buck based on my recommendation as being backed by the Tea Party. I’d love to pass on facts to them to get the information that they’re getting straightened out — but I won’t preface it by calling her a liar and I resent your immediate accusation toward me.

  • sallyw

    rdelbov, Thank you for that information. I’ll be happy to let her know. She had some other information incorrect about education in Colorado that, because I’m actively a part of Education Watchdog in MO I knew she wasn’t getting correct info.
    Thank you again, I’ll tell her.
    S

  • JSobieski

    If state legislatures picked Senators, local elections would get far more attention. Moreover, even corrupt cesspools want to protect their own interests.

    Would Obamacare have passed the Senate given all of its impositions on state governments if Senators answered to their states? It would introduce a dynamic totally absent from the current Senate. A practical way to enhance federalism.

    Even states like Michigan where I live have decent state legislatures—far better than our current two Senators.

  • audax

    …that he is not Bennett, it explains a lot about your Miller posts the other night.

  • audax
  • audax

    …but don’t quote me on that, until I find the post.

  • audax

    …glad he clarified that and also gave some good insights into Alaska politics.

  • audax

    …luckily only used it on home computer and probably should have removed Explorer. Computer started crashing daily, lots of lock ups. After removeing the Mozilla programs…no problems since.

  • SIConservative

    Nobody said it would “magically save the country”. Nothing will. That’s entirely different from the argument that it could be an improvement over the current system. The primary case that I would make in favor of repeal is that it would give state legislatures the power to reassert themselves over a federal government that has usurped many of the powers that rest rightfully in the hands of state legislatures. You have yet to present an argument as to why the current system is better.

  • kb3mkd

    I have been using Firefox since it first came out. MUCH better than IE.
    I use IE only for IE only sites, and surprisingly microsoft.com is not one of them, in fact Firefox is faster than IE on microsoft.com.

  • mlowry

    The first law of sales is “Don’t debate your prospect. If you win the debate you make your prospect a loser and he won’t buy from you.”

    The GOP and conservatives generally need to learn to present the voting public a program that they will buy. That means good old benefits selling. Reagan was a master at this. The current generation of conservatives are not. We may win because the Democrats are making everyone afraid and mad, but it will be a temporary win.

    To establish a long term basis for changing our government, conservatives have to do the hard marketing of changing the public’s attitude in a positive way. “Democrats are bad” is an inadequate platform.

    For example, why are reduced entitlements good for everyone, not just the rich? (a rhetorical question, but one that is difficult to answer favorably for the beneficiaries of the entitlements).

    The second law of sales: if you lose the sale, don’t blame the customer, blame yourself. No one wants to buy from a snarling, “no-no-no” representative.

  • itrytobenice

    I am one, and we are right in the middle of trying to get party affiliation information right now so we can contact people as the election approaches for help, voting, etc.

    I *promise* you, if you call your local party office and volunteer, we’ll put you on the phone so fast and for so long, you’ll think you just signed up for diabetes information.

    Plus, we’ll put a yard sign in your yard, a bumper sticker on your car, and other wicked things as well.

  • IJB
  • johnthebaptistmoore

    How can all leftist activist judges, at all levels, be successfully stopped? How can all political correctness be successfully reversed until it’s all successfully eliminated, for always? How can all ongoing and worsening political bias in the mainstream media and entertainment world be, finally, ended, for always? How can all leftist political indoctrination still happening throughout all government controlled schools be, finally, ended, for always? Should term limits be fully enacted, at every political level and at every judicial level? Should all judges at all levels be voted in/out by the voting general public? How can all leftist legislation and all leftist laws be successfully changed to pro-conservative, pro-free market, pro-capitalistic solutions on all issues and for always? How can all non-leftist individuals throughout the entire world form much better alliances with each other, so that worldwide, non-leftist politics can really become much stronger, overall, with all issues that fully effect everybody, worldwide, at the same time? How can justice ever really, fully, and finally be done upon all leftist individuals and upon all leftist entities that really have done way too many unconstitutional things over many decades and counting?

  • dmccracken

    Anna Little recently polled within 6 points of Pallone, and Pallone’s number was only 40%. That looks like a vulnerable CongressCritter to me. She has a heavy ground game because of low funding, but it is working. I just hope it works enough to get her elected on Nov. 2nd.

  • dmccracken

    No, Christie’s not truly conservative, but he is a breath of fresh air here in liberal-la-la land.

  • eburke

    Jim DeMint but she’ll be a quantum improvement over what you have now without a doubt. If she’s with us on judicial nominees, spending and health care repeal, I can live with the rest.

    Babs is not only a flaming liberal, her IQ is serveral points shy of a french fry.

  • eburke
  • alexpope

    Erick,
    You’re great, but you need to take a closer look at what’s happening in California. Carly Fiorina is standing firm for conservative principles; she is not backing down. Unlike perhaps Meg Whitman, who seems to be waffling in certain areas, Carly is providing a clear conservative choice against Boxer. Don’t take my word for it; check it out for yourself. She’s the real deal and she deserves Red State’s support.

  • http://jeffmericle.com Jeff Mericle

    “Her IQ is several points shy of a french fry” — Now that gave me a good laugh out loud moment, but the sad thing is that the statement can be extrapolated to the California electorate who has sent her back again and again. We have an uphill battle here for sure, but it is encouraging to see people becoming engaged. I was always voting, but that was it. I found out about RedState.com a few months back via someone’s tweet and was lurking and that was when I found out about Precinct Committees. I missed out on this election cycle, but have found other ways to get involved now. I think others are beginning to do that too and if we just keep pressing on from here on out, we can make a difference.

  • soljerblue

    I always seem to come late to this blog after all the good points have been made. But — Erick — thanks for reiterating the need to stay focused on the end result November 2nd! We need to hear this daily from now until then, and ingest its meaning in our souls.

    And, let me add the following: even if we run the table in the election, we have only begun to fight. IF we can send enough conservatives to the House and Senate to form a cohesive bloc of constitutionalists, our FIRST task is to either re-educate or change the Republican leadership in Congress. Until we do that we will have little success in defeating or rolling back Obama’s and the Democrats’ socialist agenda.

  • SIConservative

    I’m not making the case that it will happen. I asked you to give me a reason why it’s a bad idea and you have yet to do so.