on the debate. The topic was how Scott hurt himself by telling Sink not to laugh at his allegations. The fact that Sink was getting crib notes and that Scott called her on it never came up.

on the debate. The topic was how Scott hurt himself by telling Sink not to laugh at his allegations. The fact that Sink was getting crib notes and that Scott called her on it never came up.

The only rules that count are the ones that can work in my favor.I don’t need no stinkin rules. All those rules we agreed to they are only to keep those cheating Republicans from telling the truth.
With Sink Florida is SUNK !!!

I was at the debate last night at Univeristy of South Florida.

It was OVERWHELMING in favor of Scott, from the sign waiving prior to the debate through to the end.

Scott was clear and articulate and positive. Sink was pervasive, inaccurate, and condescending.

Scott told SINK not to laugh at the comments that HE made about HER regarding the banking fraud that she engaged in that resulted in senior citizens losing money. Evidently to Sink, this was funny.
Scott wisely called her on it.

I watched the event with approximately 400 people. The entire room was electric and inspired by Scott’s performance and got a real clear look how BAD Sink is.

As Erick said, Sink cheated in the debate by texting with her aid when the rules were that neither candidate should use cell phone or computer during the debate.

One of the biggest highlights though was Scott’s answer to Sink’s claim of having ALL the FLorida newspaper’s endorsements. Since the entire news media in Florida has to this point been pure BIAS in favor of Obama. Sink proved Scott’s point that she is, and would continue to be a PURE Obama rubber stamp.

Scott nailed this debate hands down last night and there is not one person that I found who didnt agree – other than the Florida news media who love Obama and want more Obama.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/os-sink-scott-cnn-debate-20101025,0,6501936.story

“Scott, 57, an investor in Naples who moved to Florida seven years ago, repeatedly stuck to the national Republican songbook…. ”

First time they’ve even been that subtle in their digs on Scott. They sure hate that he questions the $2.6B hi-speed rail between Tampa and Orlando airports. The ridership & revenue figures don’t ad up at all but Sentinel uses it as a club in their endorsement against Scott.

J’accuse!: My Cousin Got Caught Cheating At the FL Governor’s Debate

http://www.practicalstate.com/?p=3025

Cheers

…and grounds for the proprietors of this establishment to show you the door. Beware.

That is a good example of how phony these politicians are today. Cant debate without a $75.00 an hour makeup artist. Pretty sad. I wonder if the next artist will be able to hide Sink’s snakelike eyes that seem to be buried way back in her head a la most devious people?
Sink is as phony as the rest of the Socialist party. I have been asking her pointed questions for 7 months now, and not one answer ever. Scott, on the other hand answered most of them via E-mail. Sink is a typical Dem- she doesnt have to answer to the people who pay her salary, period. She is an elitest who says anyone questioning her is just another dumb person who has no right to ask her anything. This is EXACTLY what we dont need in Florida. vote Scott. Stop the creeping Socialism from getting more roots in Florida.

I’m not saying that most politicians are fake or corrupt, however, there is a reason for the make-up artists on these shows. Typically, people are UGLY on any type/size screen if they aren’t at least touched up a little. This is especially the case when placed on stages under many hot lights. For political debates, people are often placed in situations where they need make-up just to look as good as they do normally.

That said, many politicians are fake, corrupt, worthless liars, etc.

Of course, my personal belief about cheating in a debate by violating ANY pre-agreed condition (including repeated going 1 or 2 or 3 or more minutes over agreed response times) should be penalized by automatic removal from the total debate. You agree no notes/messages from staff during debate, and you accept such a message, you are removed from the debate and your opponent gets free response/Q&A time. (It isn’t like Sink could not have rejected the message. She took quite some time reading it, especially for a 2-sentence message.) If you agree no pre-prepared noted, then the same.

Whatever the rules and conditions are for the debate, they should be followed. The agreements on the rules should be given teeth to make it in their own self-interest not to cheat. (This may be the only way to keep Democrats from breaking debate rules, which is less prevalent than voter fraud, but is still pretty much a one-sided issue.)

Here in Florida it is all the buzz that people have gotten clear that Sink is a hard core cheat…both on and off the camera. The blatent text cheating in front of the camera was a mirror into her character.

Everyone I’ve spoken to on both sides of the isle were appauled at her blatent disregard for the rules and her overall arrogance and condescending attitude in the debate.

People didnt realize that it is Alex Sink who really has the illegal record, not Scott. Her banking fraud hurt seniors.

They also werent aware that she is 100% being backed by Unions and Soros PACs and that she is for all the worst amendments on the ballot in Florida….4,5 and 6 (all being pushed by out of state Socialist enablers for Soros groups).

Sink has been able to fool some…….but not any longer.

The more people on the right AND left find out about the TRUTH of Sink, they becoem more clear that she is a rubber stamp for Obama/Soros and would be a BIG detriment and mistake for Florida.

The more people find out the TRUTH about Scott, they find out that he is true conservative and a man of integrity and that he would be a BIG empowerment and forwarding for Floida.

All grass roots conservatives her in Florida have taken a stand for Scott. He is the right choice for Florida

When interviewed later, Sink LIED directly into the camera saying she thought it was from a family member, but her “makeup” aide identified the text as from her campaign. LIE. You could see LIE written all over her face.

Secondly, what was the content of the text?
and, did Sink use that information in the debate? That would be the ultimate proof.

Don’t let this LIE die.