« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Senate GOP Views Tea Party as “Destructive”. Still Seeks to Use Tom Coburn to Co-Opt New Conservative Senators.

“The irony is that the new Senators the GOP is portraying as “problems” will be more reliable votes for the GOP than the Senators the GOP is touting.”

This is a most interesting read from MSNBC.com, not actually affiliated with the television network of the same name and actively trying to come up with a new name so as not to be associated with Alan Grayson when his new show starts.

Begin, if you will, with this:

“Senator McConnell will move quickly to include them,” said a GOP strategist who is close to the Republican leader. “The worst thing you can do to somebody who’s got a lot of energy and a lot of ideas is to wall them off and not let them be expressed.”

Key to McConnell’s success, added a former GOP leadership aide, will be to harness and channel the Tea Party agenda “in a way that’s productive rather than destructive or harmful to Senate Republicans or the country in general.

Now, when you read stuff like this you know clearly that this person is reflecting the thinking of the leadership because in stories like this the reporter always asks for people to talk to. Also, you now know that the Senate GOP views the tea party movement as “destructive or harmful” not just to the Senate GOP, which is a good thing, but also to the country.

Then there is Don Stewart, a spokesman for Mitch McConnell.

Don Stewart says, “Senator McConnell often says that if having more conservative members in the Senate is a ‘problem,’ it’s a ‘problem’ he wants to have.”

It’s not a bad quote, but who exactly is saying having more conservative members is a problem other than the Senate GOP leadership?

More troubling is the continued storyline that Tom Coburn is going to be the conservative movement’s Judas, sent by Mitch McConnell to betray them and co-opt them into the purposes of the Senate GOP against Jim DeMint and the conservatives.

Now I happen to know that this is the leadership pushing this story and Tom Coburn has nothing to do with it. And that’s stupid because it puts Tom Coburn in a terrible spot.

If Coburn does now become the go between, the incoming conservatives will know for certain that when they see Tom Coburn’s face, they are hearing Mitch McConnell’s voice.

That puts Coburn in an untenable position and I cannot believe he’d be stupid enough to concede and go along with this.

Note to Tom Coburn — stay humble and remember you may think you should do this and undermine McConnell in the process, but in reality you will not succeed. You’ll just taint yourself.

By the way, the irony is that the new Senators the GOP is portraying as “problems” will be more reliable votes for the GOP than the Senators the GOP is touting.

COMMENTS

  • The_Rebel

    before we even get the majority, and the same came be said for this Roll Call story last week:

    http://www.rollcall.com/issues/56_41/news/50992-1.html

    Rep Kucinich’s daughter wrote the Roll Call article, with many unattributed statements by various Republicans.

  • reddog53

    I think that you may be reading too much into this, but I will stipulate that you’re the expert here.

    I know that you distrust Senator McConnell with good reason, as well. I don’t like the order expressed (Senate Republicans first, GOP, then country) either, but I realize that these folks are so immersed in the politics that it is hard for them to think otherwise.

    I’m pretty much an optimist by nature, so I may be wrong here.

    I think the primary intent is to ‘harness the energy in a productive way’ — which I take to mean a good thing. The “Tea Party” candidates and other rookies could very easily be scattered and made less productive by the various forces in DC. Harnessing them together could be a good way to keep them pulling on the same things at the same time and actually helping to accomplish the things they were elected to do. The unstructured nature of the Tea Party is both a blessing and a curse, from the standpoint of accomplishing the legislation that needs to be passed — there is an order to it, with extensive Senate Rules governing it, that most of the rookies are only partially aware of.

    We definitely need to keep alert to anything that dilutes the newcomers power and effectiveness, including having the established leadership try to minimize them….but let’s watch the process and then melt the switchboards if we need to.

  • acat

    D.C. insiders are *not* your friends.

    Mew

  • jenniferjmilleresq

    leadership, I’d say it’s crucial to address this before we get the majority. And it will NOT tear us apart.

  • jenniferjmilleresq

    Jim DeMint, make no mistake about it.

  • congressworksforus

    This is McConnell’s attempt to neutralize the Tea Party, because if he doesn’t, he gets primaried next time…

  • rec0n

    “Key to McConnell?s success, added a former GOP leadership aide, will be to harness and channel the Tea Party agenda ?in a way that?s productive rather than destructive or harmful to Senate Republicans or the country in general.?

    But it goes both ways. The GOP/McConnell are sidestepping the reason behind the TeaParty’s existence, and I reject entirely that these people pose a danger to the country – that’s a pandering load of bull. Meanwhile, they’ll need those votes as much as the Party elects will need the GOP’s experience & seniority, won’t they. And not everyone in the Senate with experience are in McConnells pocket.

    I do wonder about Boehner and the House.

  • congressworksforus

    But the one thing I think gives you hope for Boehner is that he has never taken, nor asked for, an earmark the entire time he’s been in Congress.

    There’s something to be said for that.

  • eburke

    there would have been no need to add the portion of the statement referencing hurting the country and the Republican Party.

    I’m good with the part that says that the Tea Party Movement will hurt the Republican Party if Republican Party = Establishment Elite.

    The part about the TPM possibly hurting the country is inexcusable and, I believe, a barometer of what their true feelings are toward the great unwashed masses.

  • eburke

    left in Congress would be Mike Pence,

    Having said that, I’ve got a lot more confidence in John Boehner than I do Mitch McConnell…and I have precious little confidence in John.

  • fpete13527
  • bigredone

    I am one Kentuckian who hopes McConnell draws a primary in 2014, but until then, I hope he becomes Majority Leader.

    I am torn, but hey, it’s a great place to be!

  • StandardCandle

    Mike Pence surprises me from time to time… almost as if he’s trying to straddle the boundaries of Conservative, and accepted in the leadership club.

    I don’t know, Boehner seems to pull great palor tricks when its both useful and gets him good press…. but outside of a good press moment he’s about as uppercase ‘C’ conservative as a $1000 bad haircut.

  • Adjoran

    “FORMER leadership aide” who won’t even give his name said.

    And we criticize legacy media for shoddy sourcing and jumping to wild conclusions on no evidence whatever?

    I know the lunatic fringe wants nothing more than a massive purge to start off the new year right, so any old port in a storm, eh? Or is this supposed to be a shot across the bow of Tom Coburn, warning him he may be next to wear the “RINO” label?

  • The_Gadfly

    Senate Majority Leader – Jim DeMint.

  • The_Gadfly

    and the Leadership will fall into line.

  • The_Gadfly

    constitute the “Lunatic Fringe” huh?

  • StandardCandle

    I think he’s smarter than becoming McConnell’s messenger…

    Personally I see this as McConnell trying to marginalize conservatives in the senate in total… as in prevent Coburn and Demint from creating a coalition by pitting them against each other for freshman class love… typical High School BS coming from someone adept to pettiness…

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • uselogic

    Is that in reference to Boehner’s uber tan? :-)

    (And yes, I know it was parlor. Just too good for my inner frat boy to pass up.)

  • uselogic

    Is that in reference to Boehner’s uber tan? :-)

    (And yes, I know it was parlor. Just too good for my inner frat boy to pass up.)

  • Robert Allen Leeper

    Not a very reliable source, without more, for what the current leadership is thinking.

  • avgjo

    told us not let Fox News bias us against the ‘nice person’ Pelosi. I like the senator, but that sort of talk makes me cautious.

  • avgjo

    told us not let Fox News bias us against the ‘nice person’ Pelosi. I like the senator, but that sort of talk makes me cautious.

  • kestrel

    I agree, he’s smarter than becoming McConnell?s messenger.

  • StandardCandle