While the RNC is pushing back against people like me for pointing out they did not mount a good GOTV effort because they sabotaged their 72 hour program, they’ll have a hard time pushing back against Haley Barbour.
Barbour has, a bit surprisingly, gone on the record to say that the RNC’s get out the vote (GOTV) efforts were sub-par. Given just how effective the Republican Governors Association was last week, it’ll make any sort of push back against Barbour difficult.
Well that’s up to the Committee, and I will say that this time the RNC was not able to do what they’ve often done in the past, and the Governor’s Association, the Senate and House Campaign Committees, and others had to scramble around and increase their gathering of resources beyond what normally would’ve been the case because the RNC was not able to do what it had done in the past.
But this is the tip of the iceberg. I’m told by several people close to multiple 2012 contenders and also some present elected officials that Republican committeemen began receiving phone calls at the end of last week making the case that it is time for a change at the RNC.
In fact, after reading my post from yesterday, one potential 2012 contender emailed me directly and said I could quote him as long as I didn’t use his name:
Whoever the nominee is [in 2012] will control the RNC, but until that point someone needs to be there who everyone has confidence in. That person is not there now.
If the RNC does start looking, have I got a suggestion for them.
Jeff Emanuel
Neil Stevens
Republicans, myself included...
IronDioPriest (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:17AM EDT (link)…made a decision to avoid donating money to the RNC, the NRSC, and the NRCC, and instead, to direct our donations to conservative candidates. I gave MORE money to Republicans this cycle, while eschewing my traditional donations to the committees. Anecdotally, millions of other Republicans did the same.
I have no idea whether this is proper reasoning, but it occurs to me that perhaps by withholding the full array of its GOTV machine, the RNC is trying to send the message that ideas and actions have consequences.
“If we finally fail in this great and glorious contest, it will be by bewildering ourselves in groping for the middle way.”
-John Adams, 1776
Join in the conservative forum discussion at “It’s About Liberty”: http://www.itsaboutliberty.com
Actions have consequences...
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:22AM EDT (link)And if you’re right and the {foul}up with GOTV was deliberate, then heads seriously need to roll.
That action must have consequences.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
Agreed.
IronDioPriest (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:34AM EDT (link)I’m just kind of wondering aloud, based on this apparent lack of GOTV action, coupled with how we’ve seen the “establishment” squaring off against the grassroots of the party, if there is not a general message being sent as a counter to the message we’re sending them.
“If we finally fail in this great and glorious contest, it will be by bewildering ourselves in groping for the middle way.”
-John Adams, 1776
Join in the conservative forum discussion at “It’s About Liberty”: http://www.itsaboutliberty.com
Sort of "If the only tool you have is a hammer..." ?
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:42AM EDT (link)only, in the case of the gutless D.C. wing of the GOP, the only tool is incompetence?
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
juumanistra (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:32AM EDT (link)Actions do indeed have consequences, but might I offer a less conspiratorial explanation? The RNC has said it did not pursue its traditional GOTV program because of it did not make sense from a cost-benefit perspective. That such considerations had to be made in the first place implies that they had unforeseen financial constraints, such as diminished revenue streams from the large numbers of donors who joined the Not One Red Cent movement over the past few election cycles. Gets us to the same place — that donating directly to candidates might have had an adverse effect on the RNC — without ascribing bad faith to the actions the RNC undertook.
A valid point, but one that doesn't go far enough.
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:44AM EDT (link)If they’re too cash-strapped to fund GOTV .. one must ask what they are spending money doing, eh?
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
Kowalski... and Pournelle's Iron Law
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:48AM EDT (link)If the major purpose of the GOP is to elect Republicans, and they did not slash every other program to fund GOTV, then this cat concludes that Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy applies – and until all the people who are more interested in protecting their own jobs at the expense of the organization are fired, it won’t change.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
There's a difference between bad decisions and bad faith.
juumanistra (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:56AM EDT (link)The last-minute pumping of several million dollars into California’s media markets is a fair target for answering that question. I’m sure you could find other debatable strategic decisions taken by the RNC in the closing days of the election which also devoured scarce resources.
But there’s a rather wide chasm between the RNC making tough choices about resource allocation that don’t pan out and what IronDioPriest gets at. As IronDioPriest’s point is that, perhaps, the RNC consciously chose to impair the GOTV effort so as to teach those uppity Tea Partiers a thing or three. There’s simply no evidence of that (thus far), and I’d prefer to avoid ascribing the twirling of wispy-wisp mustaches to guys who’re at the end of the day on our side without something to go on beyond discontent with the party establishment.
Let's list out the facts, though.
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:32AM EDT (link)1) GOTV was noticeably weak. Too few “boots on the ground”. Erick noticed. Haley Barbour noticed.
2) As you say, they did have money to pump into some races.. but money is only one resource available.
3) To be specific, the RNC and existing house and senate members did NOT loan out their staffers to assist, as has been done just about every election …
So, they hardly “did all they could”. Demonstrated.
Therefore, IronDioPriest has a valid point. Was the cause of their not doing everything possible incompetence or malfeasance?
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
Validity is in the eye of the beholder, but point taken.
juumanistra (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:41AM EDT (link)The problem is demonstrating that it was actual malfeasance as opposed to garden-variety incompetence. My only point has been to sound the alarm bells nice and early about speculating about malfeasance without anything resembling an allegation, let alone evidence. Perspective counts, especially when the siren’s call of conspiracymongering against the GOP establishment is involved.
You're splitting the wrong hair, juumanistra.
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:55AM EDT (link)The reason does not matter. The result does.
Those who fouled this up need to join the ranks of the unemployed.
Period.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
Actually, the reason is paramount.
juumanistra (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:34PM EDT (link)I wholeheartedly agree that those who fouled this up need to join the ranks of the unemployed.
My concern is with not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. The implied charge of consciously sabotaging GOP electoral efforts to spite the Tea Party is quite serious. I’d very much like to see only those who are actually worthy of such being tarred with it. And slapping it on the entire RNC invariably will tar quite a few folks who have done nothing to deserve such.
Why? Seriously, why? If it's just to "be accurate" ...
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:12PM EDT (link)then I assert that it’s a distraction.
Also, who said anything about “slapping the whole RNC” ? I was quite specific – the heads responsible for not putting boots on the ground in the final 72 hours must go.
We know that was a decision. We don’t know just how far the fish has rotted, but we do know that everyone from that point down is suspect.
If they want a chance to “redeem themselves” (or to “fix the record”) then the best way is to go get involved with one of the campaigns or state party organizations. Their fruit there will show what they’re made of.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
juuminstra has a point acat...in that...it serves no useful end to go into conspiracy theories to explain this
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:55PM EDT (link)I’ts not necessary…the blame can be laid at the RNCs feet without having to read anything at all into it other than, “The screwed up big time.”
I’ll also point to the focus on Steele’s reelection as I’ve pointed out above…there is no speculation there….it’s in the record as a fact that Steele was more focused on self promotion over the last months than he was in electing Republicans.
Whatever the reason…the RNC is to blame…speculating on whether the RNC was deliberately incompetent…or just your garden variety incompetent is unnecessary unless the deliberate sabotage can be proven to a point.
This is something that frosts my briches...when we are talking about alocating scarce resources...
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:40PM EDT (link)Bush wasted millions on CA in 2004…..and McLame wasted millions with the absurd hope of winning PA in 2008
Why is it that we have people high up in the decision making chain that insist on putting their focus on lost causes?
The funds and efforts but in in CA could have been used to help put McMahon, Buck, or Rossi over the top…but we spent millions in a blue state trying to elect a RINO that would have been an unreliable vote at best had we pulled it off
Amen nt
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:45PM EDT (link)I'm sorry juumanistra...
IronDioPriest (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:45AM EDT (link)…but ascribing bad faith to professional politicians is my default position these days. Some rise above, and I give them credit when they demonstrably do so. But Steele and the people he works for haven’t shown me anything in which to base confidence in their intentions.
I sure would love to have my questions answered and my suspicions put to rest.
“If we finally fail in this great and glorious contest, it will be by bewildering ourselves in groping for the middle way.”
-John Adams, 1776
Join in the conservative forum discussion at “It’s About Liberty”: http://www.itsaboutliberty.com
How, exactly, do you prove you did not act in bad faith?
juumanistra (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:06AM EDT (link)It’s rather hard to prove a negative: Especially in this kind of case, where if the RNC issued a memo saying, “Our decisions on the Seventy-Two Hour Program were made in good faith and for the betterment of the Republican Party,” we’d all rightly scoff at it for being boilerplate. Distrust of party professionals is certainly understandable: But you need more than simply that before wondering aloud if the RNC intentionally sabotaged its own operations to stick it to the Tea Party. For better or worse, the Tea Party and the GOP establishment are in this together, and everyone would do well to remember that.
That said, Steele’s head should be on the chopping block. RNC’s been a mess since the man took over.
"By their fruit shall ye know them" applies here. [nt]
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:27AM EDT (link)——

Caveat Suffragator
Again, making no accusations...
IronDioPriest (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:28AM EDT (link)…just wondering aloud at possible meaning in a convergence of facts. In spite of your mild admonishment, the question remains open in my mind.
I agree, Steele should go. But getting him to leave may be tricky. He’s played the race card before when his suitability for the post was called into question. He’s openly proclaimed his desire to stay on the job, and seems willing to take credit for the electoral rout to make his case. If he’s jettisoned there is a ready made narrative waiting that says racists got rid of him even though he was wildly successful.
“If we finally fail in this great and glorious contest, it will be by bewildering ourselves in groping for the middle way.”
-John Adams, 1776
Join in the conservative forum discussion at “It’s About Liberty”: http://www.itsaboutliberty.com
Even if Steele calls racism
Scope (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:35AM EDT (link)if he is voted out from the RNC Chair position, so what. He did not win the position “for life.” Every Chair goes through re-election every year.
If only the fix wasn’t in last year, Blackwell would and should have won. He was the only one to pour his heart and soul into actually writing plans, and had tons of ideas including getting the youth on board. I pray those that decide will give him a chance this year, if he wants it.
Nasty thought... what if Palin backs Steele? [nt]
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:13PM EDT (link)——

Caveat Suffragator
Endorsements for Steele: Irrelevant
chihank Tuesday, November 9th at 1:39PM EDT (link)RNC Chair is determined by Delegates, not the grassroots.
The RNC Chair is an insider’s game.
Yes, and who picks the delegates this time?
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:44PM EDT (link)Hint, thanks to Cold Warrior and the Precinct Project, there are now grass roots among the delegates.
Not many but .. some.
Hopefully, enough to put cat among the chickens.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
That would be the end of Palin....She's only half recoverd in my estimation from backing Mclame....nt
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:01PM EDT (link)Palin will stay clear of that contest
red_oakster (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:03PM EDT (link)She is nothing if not shrewd.
I never equated "shrewd" with
mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:12PM EDT (link)“acts in self interest”.
Don’t be surprised when she comes out for Steele.
That's what I'm thinking, Becker.
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:45PM EDT (link)She’s forged a relationship with Steele, and it’s in her best interest to have someone who is both friendly (or neutral) toward her and toward “the establishment” in as RNC head.
It may be possible for her to work with another RNC head. I suspect that it doesn’t really matter much to her as long as the RNC head isn’t hostile… so she may just stay on the sidelines.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
acat- That would make me puke
Scope (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 3:31PM EDT (link)only slightly less than when she backed McCain and Fiorina against DeVore.
Once is hapenstance, twice is coincidence, three times
The_Gadfly (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:22PM EDT (link)is enemy action.
Once is Crist. Twice is what got pulled on Nikki Haley. Three times is not turning out the GOTV. Fourth is Murkowski and Miller. Fifth is not backing candidates on recount issues. I could probably continue, but we are WAY past enemy action already.
Because the establishment has been so good to her?
earlgrey (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:23PM EDT (link)I don’t see why she would do it, unless she really is in it somehow just for herself. She would lose a lot of crediblity
The mood of the country is sour.
The_Gadfly (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:09PM EDT (link)And we are no longer to simply ascribe “incompetence” as the explanation when “malfeasance” is at least as reasonable an explanation. I’m in a hanging sort of mood, so I am going to charge “malfeasance” and leave it to them to prove it wasn’t. And there’s nothing wrong with that because this isn’t a court of law.
Besides which, when the incompetents start to realize they might be going up on malfeasance, they may opt for jobs where they are less likely to get splatted.
And this is how the media gets their Republican civil war.
juumanistra (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:29PM EDT (link)The baying at the moon for the blood of the establishment, the urge to cleanse the impure from the temple of the GOP, and the desire to put conservatism’s counterrevolutionaries up against the wall need to be ended. Now. As much fun as a pogrom through the hallowed halls of the establishment would be, the only people it helps are those on the other side of the political spectrum. A deft touch is required if your goal is a purge of the entrenched interests of the party’s establishment: A lynch mob’s congregation will only produce more Delawares, and we all don’t want that.
The incompetents will get their comeuppance and their heads shall roll. What’s nettlesome is doing it in a way that doesn’t make the cure worse than the disease.
The real civil war is taking place in the democratic party
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:38PM EDT (link)Hoyer vs. Clyburn
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/252740/hoyer-vs-clyburn-daniel-foster#
The fallout of Nancy Pelosi’s decision to stay in power — and her failure so far to engineer a smooth transition for her lieutenants — continued to ripple through the Democratic Caucus over the weekend as Steny Hoyer of Maryland and Jim Clyburn of South Carolina battled for the votes needed to become minority whip.
Those who had once simpered: “I don’t want to destroy the rich, I only want to seize a little of their surplus to help the poor, just a little, they’ll never miss it!” – then, later, had snapped: “The tycoons can stand being squeezed; they’ve amassed enough to last them for three generations” – then, later, had yelled: “Why should the people suffer while businessmen have reserves to last a year?” – now were screaming: “Why should we starve while some people have reserves to last a week?” – Atlas Shrugged
You are correct izoneguy
Scope (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 4:00PM EDT (link)Here is a link for the text of the letter from some Dems asking Pelosi to step aside for the good of the party-
http://www.foxnewsinsider.com/2010/11/08/full-text-defeated-dems-letter-to-pelosi/
Back in September, before the wipeout, 31 Dems wrote Pelosi a letter saying they support the extension of the Bush tax cuts for everyone-
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/31-dems-to-pelosi-extend-bush-tax-cuts-for-everyone.php
With the war between Pelosi, and many of those she forced to vote as they were told, it will be a benefit to the Republicans. She will not change, she will remain a bull in a china shop, and maybe even she will lose in 2012.
I think the Republicans should send her a letter congratulating her on her continuing leadersip of those Democrats left in the House.
Let them. I mean
The_Gadfly (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:06PM EDT (link)it worked out so well for them in the 2010 elections. I’m confident it will do the same or better for 2012.
We are coming for the establishmentarians who stand in the way of returning our Republic to its foundational roots. Lead, follow, or get he h*** out of the way.
I would agree with this wholeheartedly with several exception...We need to be weary of the Benedict Arnolds in our midst...
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:15PM EDT (link)The Soros Funded fifth Column Organizations set up to confound and confuse the caucus and sabotage to mission as agreed upon by the great majority of the Republican Party….
More Later
Though we do need to be weary as well of the court of Monsuier Robspier and Madamme Le Guilotine
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:22PM EDT (link)Though we do need to be weary as well of the court of Monsieur Robespierre and Madame La Guillotine.
The blood lust and drunken power that can swamp revolutions such as happened in the Reign of Terror and the Salem Witch Trials must be avoided at all costs….any purge must be conducted with thoughtful thoroughness and passionless precision to avoid the bloodletting that could overwhelm us in 2012
Regardles....if that's the case...it is the behavior of the RNC that accounts for the limited resources...
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:31PM EDT (link)you can try to fry the same egg six different ways…but it’s still the heat that fries it…
in other words…maybe the RNC didn’t fund the GOTV effort out of spite because people weren’t just blindly giving them money…or because they are short of funds and just couldn’t fund the GOTV efforts because people weren’t just blindly giving them money…the fault still lies with the RNC because it’s the snide and derisive way they have treated the base of this party that is the reason for the shortfall of revenues.
Frustrated ex-RNC member.
jmcmd Tuesday, November 9th at 12:06PM EDT (link)I didn’t donate to the RNC this cycle either and based on the conversations I had with RNC reps when they were soliciting money I could tell that a lot of conservatives were doing the same thing. The bigger question I have is whether the GOTV effort was underfunded or underorganized. My fear is that we’ve lost 2 years of developing a precinct infrastructure under Steele. This is criminal given the amount of enthusiasm that was at our disposal. Unless the RNC realizes that it is going to take a huge effort to counter the DNC’s ability to deliver union hacks and clueless welfare recipients to the polls who would vote for Hitler if he had a D next to his name, BHO will get a second term. Steele has to go and quickly whether the GOTV issue was intentional or not.
I have the same frustration
earlgrey (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:20PM EDT (link)I have been told it takes years to develop a GOTV roots in a community, and while I worked with many energized people this past election, how long will that enthusiisam last without snaring these people into some kind of organized structure so they can continue to have confidence that they are making a difference.
Let's make sure our terminology is accurate re "RNC member"
ColdWarrior (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:25PM EDT (link)The ONLY real members of the RNC are the delegates to it.
The Rules of the Republican Party govern the RNC membership. Sending $50 or $100 to the RNC (or whatever it takes these days) to get you “Sustaining Membership” or “Silver Membership” with your name embossed on a plastic card gets you no real “membership” in the Party or the RNC — all it gets you is $50 or $100 less in your pocket to spend on your local Rep. Party committee activities and that piece of plastic. It gets you absolutely no means for changing the RNC.
A while back I wrote the following in a comment to a AceInTX Diary:
Here’s the link to the full comment and Ace’s Diary:
http://www.redstate.com/aceintx/2010/05/23/when-given-an-opportunity-to-speak-to-first-principles-steele-throws-rand-paul-under-the-bus/#comment-2108
Bottom line: the BEST way to get involved to help build “boots on the ground” GOTV efforts for 2012 is to become a precinct committeeman.
Bottom line: the ONLY way you as a Republican can have an effect on the outcome of the election of the RNC Chairman is by becoming a voting member of the Party — a precinct committeemen — because ONLY precinct committeemen elect the delegates who select the three delegates from each state who ultimately cast votes for the RNC Chairman candidates. The state party chairman and two RNC delegates from the fifty states elect the RNC Chairman. Those delegates will be chosen over the course of the next three months, after local committee members elect their leaders and the precinct committeemen elect their county leaders and delegates to the state organizational meetings. At the state meetings/conventions, state Republican Party chairmen will be elected. They in turn will join the RNC delegates in electing the RNC chairman.
If you became a “card carrying member” of the Party over the course of the last two years, as I’ve advocated you should, you’ll have the right to vote for the Party leaders. Otherwise, you’ll have no voice at all. Dems da cold, hard facts.
Thank you.
ColdWarrior
In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?
Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Unified Patriots.
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and
Either Blackwell or Anuzis would be great at RNC.
Loren Heal (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 10:26AM EDT (link)Either Ken Blackwell or Saul Anuzis would be great.
Blackwell gets the need to rebuild the party at the precinct level.
–
Join the Concord Project, and follow @lheal, if you dare.
You have to ask was it the chicken or the egg....
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:11AM EDT (link)Did Steele start w/crap money or did he create the conditions for no money? I personally STOPPED giving to the RNC and NRCC in 2006 so it could have been a snowball effect. I would also state the Steele should lose because his mouth is bigger then his bank account. He called US racists, said WE did not deserve to win and fell in with the lefties on MSDNC etc to berate US on the RIGHTSIDE of the divide, that in an of itself calls for a new RNC Chair!
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Must disagree.. slightly.
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:59AM EDT (link)Yes, the number of dollars available was smaller. So what?
Dollars available doesn’t mean the RNC couldn’t put boots on the ground…. as has been done every election cycle for decades.
Regardless of the chicken or the egg, that decision was the wrong one, and whether it started as a chicken or an egg, it’s going to come home to roost….
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
Preach it Little Sister!!! nt
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:25PM EDT (link)Blackwell Blackwell Rah Rah RAH!!! [nt]
Martin Knight (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:21AM EDT (link)Martin- He should have been elected
Scope (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:39AM EDT (link)last go around. We may have been able to win even more seats with him at the helm. He had such great plans.
Indeed - I wrote it up way back then ... [nt]
Martin Knight (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:42AM EDT (link)Martin, indeed you did write it up back the, and here's the
ColdWarrior (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:36PM EDT (link)link:
http://www.redstate.com/martin_a_knight/2009/05/05/the-committeeman-project/
I wish every Redstater who is not already a precinct committeeman would take the time to read your post and all the linked articles, especially Ken Blackwell’s plan.
Thank you.
ColdWarrior
In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?
Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Unified Patriots.
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and
There's a Smiley for that
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:27PM EDT (link)Blackwell would be a fine choice...
IronDioPriest (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:46AM EDT (link)… but there is ONE, who has shown an unprecedented and unequaled ability to fund-raise, to garner attention, to motivate the base of the party.
You know who I’m talking about….
“If we finally fail in this great and glorious contest, it will be by bewildering ourselves in groping for the middle way.”
-John Adams, 1776
Join in the conservative forum discussion at “It’s About Liberty”: http://www.itsaboutliberty.com
I don't know if she wants it
Scope (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 11:58AM EDT (link)and I don’t know if she would be elected. Some of the biggest mouths in the GOP are currently trying to decapitate her to get her to sit down and shut up.
Not sure if she'd be better off on the outside throwing bombs or on the inside recruiting...
acat (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:02PM EDT (link)and a case can be made for either …
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
On the outside leading the charge - hands down.
The_Gadfly (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:17PM EDT (link)Or occasionally laying down suppressing fire. She’s charismatic and telegenic. That’s wasted when you’re doing nuts and bolts work. Inside is nuts and bolts work.
Also, wherever she goes, the LSM, the Dems, and the legal activists (but I repeat myself repeatedly) will follow wherever she goes, possibly to the exclusion of all else. If she goes to RNC she’ll bring down everything they can throw at her on everybody in the RNC. So it works out better for her to be working alone so to speak. There she can not only score points for the home team, but distract them from the sappers working the more critical tunnels under the walls.
Blackwell for Policy; Palin for Fundraising
chihank Tuesday, November 9th at 1:42PM EDT (link)Ideally, Blackwell would be in charge of policy for the RNC. While Palin would be in charge of fundraising.
However the GOP insiders want someone they can control. Thus, ex-RNC Chair Mike Duncan, a Bush appointee, is thinking of getting his old job back.
Time for some new blood at the RNC
Gary Cooper Tuesday, November 9th at 12:05PM EDT (link)I, like many others, refused to give them money this election cycle. The disorganization is just too much to actually believe these guys know what they are doing.
Haley Barbour sees this and the fact that the grassroots organization he built up is now a shell of its former self. If he wasn’t running for President, it would be best that he be the one to take over given the fact that he did a very good job at the RGA this cycle. He could rebuild and then handpick a successor to lead. Since he won’t be the one, Ken Blackwell is a good second choice for me.
I Like Saul Anuzis
itsonlywords (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:37PM EDT (link)And he was my first choice for RNC chair last time. However, I find his position on NPV to be quite disturbing. Until he gives up his support for NPV, I wouldn’t want him heading up the GOP.
Tu ne cede malis sed contra audientor ito. ~Virgil
Do not give in to evil, but proceed evermore boldly against it.
I hate to ask beacuase the answer is probably obvious and I'm missing it..What is "NPV"? nt
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:31PM EDT (link)Thanks for asking so I didn't have to :-) -nt-
eburke (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:36PM EDT (link)“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
Unified Patriots
National Popular Vote
Darin_H (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:58PM EDT (link)See Here
*crosses fingers that link worked without preview…
A visionary coward says that anger can be power, as long as there’s a victim on TV – Flat Top, Goo Goo Dolls
Like I said...probably obvious...and I missed it...heh
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 3:02PM EDT (link)I would do almost anything for the son and grandson of Righteous of the Nations
ashland_avenue (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 12:56PM EDT (link)Thank you for posting Saul’s background.
Sub-par GOTV efforts
nutmegconservative Tuesday, November 9th at 1:20PM EDT (link)In this regard, CT’s GOTV efforts were abysmal under State GOP chairman Chris Healey, costing Tom Foley the governorship, and hurting many Congressional, statewide and local candidates.
It is clear that the political bloodbath on Nov. 2 would have been far worse had not the Democrats been able to count on the $1 billion in labor union money extracted from the dues of their members. The unions, whether in my home state of CT or elsewhere, treat their members like cogs in the vast election year apparatus, and we were unable to match their efforts. Yet, we know that many union members reject their unions’ political positions, even if they do support them on matters of collective bargaining. They understand that the radical left has taken control of their leadership and that they are victims of that process. After all, 51% of union members voted for Scott Brown in Massachusetts.
The Republicans need to do a better job, however, of reaching out to those voters and inform them (1) what their unions are using them to advance a radical agenda; (2) how their radical views extend far beyond issues of collective bargaining; (3) how the current leaders are hostile to genuine notions of labor union democracy (as witnessed by SEIU’s centralization of power and card check legislation); and the biographies of those now in charge. Targeted mailings to union members would be one way of reaching on to these members in advance of the 2012 elections. If enough members asserted their rights under the Supreme Court’s Beck decision, the unions would be denied a substantial source of unearned campaign cash.
They also need to do a better job of informing voters generally how much the public employee unions are killing our state, and other states.
5s. I look forward to more from you, NMC. nt
Locke (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 3:15PM EDT (link)Ken Blackwell....That's all I'll say on the subject of who the next guy should be...
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 1:22PM EDT (link)As long as it is not Steele again…hes a self promoting ass with terminal foot in mouth disease.
I’ll make the broken record point again in case people haven’t heard it that Steele…in the biggest wave election run up of the last 75 years couldn’t out fund raise the Democrats who had an approval rating in the 30s and 40s.
At a time when he should have been deploying a ntion wide GOTV campaign he was riding around the country in a bus glad handing and politicing to keep his position…and to add insult to injury he sent $20,000 to Guam that we know of.
It’s been pointed out at The Weekly Standard that Delegates who elect the RNC chair from the five US Territories generally vote as a block which would give Steele a starting point of 15 votes against anyone mounting a challenge to him…so in essence…in the midst of such a wave election…rather than focusing on making the greatest gains possible for Republicans nation wide…Steele was more focused on self promotion and keeping his seat as RNC Chair…
There are three people I’ve heard will be running for RNC Chair that I would absolutely oppose First and Foremost is Michael Steel, Next is Mike Duncan of 2008 fame…and finally Norm Coleman who Erick has pointed out has no fighting will given the way he laid down for Al Franken
Having lived through the theft of MN's senate seat
eburke (Diary) Tuesday, November 9th at 2:35PM EDT (link)for Al Franken, I’m here to tell you that Norm Coleman would be an unmitigated disaster as RNC chair. Soros-lackey Mark Ritchie used his position as SoS to blatently steal the election and Norm decided to play patty-cake with him.
And that is in absolute keeping with his RINO, squishy voting positions. He’d be even worse than Steele *or* Duncan.
“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
Unified Patriots
1980
doncorleone Tuesday, November 9th at 4:21PM EDT (link)When I joined “Young Republicans” in June ’80, it was a bootstrap, grassroots level movement that was tremendously successful. Throwing millions of dollars at a problem or situation seems very slothful and “great society” to me, and we all know how successful that was. I agree w/ “chihank”, Palin, Blackwell, co-chairs of the r.n.c., heels on the ground, butt-kicker, teamed with a no-nonsense strategy meister.