An Avenue for Mike Pence?


Ron Brownstein has a very interesting article out today for National Journal about how the field of candidates is shaping up for 2012. He posits that the field is shaping up to be between managers like Mitt Romney and populists like Sarah Palin.

I think that is, largely, a false dichotomy, but if you change what he means by “manager” I think he is on to something. I’d use a word like “establishment” or even “conventional” to describe the end of the field Brownstein calls “managerial.”

But there is a relevant point here that I think needs to be explored, because I this I think Brownstein hit on something that is going to be exploited, or could be exploited, by someone like Mike Pence and only a select few others.

Brownstein writes:


“At the risk of oversimplifying it, I think that the upper-income college-educated [Republican] group is looking for a CEO for the economy, somebody who knows something about how jobs are created,” said veteran GOP consultant Ralph Reed, who was executive director of the influential Christian Coalition during the 1990s. “It is almost a managerial issue. I think what the more culturally conservative grassroots are looking for is a classic tea party candidate who is not intimidated by the establishment, not about to be cowed by media attacks; who will stand up and fight for them and will be a real game-changer, if elected, in terms of how Washington operates.”

Republicans have typically picked nominees who fit the manager mold more closely than the populist one (although some, particularly Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, combined elements of both). But the demographic balance of power inside the GOP coalition is shifting downscale, a change that could provide a greater opening for the populists, including Palin if she runs. The party’s new tilt could also produce a 2012 race that divides the GOP much more than before along lines of class and education, the same fissures that have often characterized Democratic nominating contests, particularly the 2008 race between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

“We know from history that usually, almost always, the manager wing—the mainstream conservative Republican wing—nominates the candidate,” says consultant John Weaver, a longtime senior strategist for 2008 GOP nominee John McCain. “But if we are seeing real cultural shifts inside the party where we will have more blue-collar, noncollege-educated voters, that could change.”

Let’s ignore the labels Brownstein uses and instead view it in quadrants formed by two axes, an “x” and a “y”. The “X” we will label “connects with the base at a gut level”. The “Y” will be “connects with the establishment at a gut level.” The ideal candidate is someone who is going to be in the top right quadrant. They connect with the base and with the establishment.

#alttext#

For purposes of making it through the nomination this time, unlike most other times, I would venture to say that connecting with the base is going to be more important than connecting with the establishment.

Placement on the x and y axes is very subjective. You and I can perfectly disagree on this. But I think we should both be able to agree that placement in the upper right is best for any candidate.

Right now, looking at the field, I would say that Mike Pence, Rick Perry (who I don’t think is actually running), and Haley Barbour do that best. Pence, having been in the House leadership and also unquestionably being a tea party conservative fits into that bracket.

Brownstein is right that the “managerial” or “establishment” or “insider” class typically picks the nominee. See e.g. Nixon, Ford, George H. W. Bush, Dole, and McCain. Reagan and George W. Bush, however, blended both the establishment’s trust and the grassroot’s trust.

In a wildcard year like 2012, I think the nominee will not by the typical “heir-apparent” as the GOP usually chooses. I think it can we a wildcard and I think of all the wild cards out there right now among existing politicos, Pence makes the most sense.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

277 Comments Leave a comment

Road for Pence not easy

chihank Friday, December 17th at 12:24PM EDT (link)

Pence is going to have a tough time in the primaries. He has Palin, Huckabee, and Daniels to deal with. I think that if Pence runs, then Palin will decline to run and back Pence. That should make things a bit easier. But, Huckabee could stop any traction Pence might get in Iowa or South Carolina as Huckabee trys to “Out Christian” the field.

I like Pence. Unlike another high profile IN politican, Pence considers social issues and fiscal issues to be important.

Point of order.

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:10PM EDT (link)

“Unlike another high profile IN politican, Pence considers social issues and fiscal issues to be important.”

I might quibble with your language a tad — assuming you’re talking about Gov. Daniels. There’s a difference between importance and urgency.

I get the sense that his proffer of a “truce” had to do with the relative urgency — not importance — of significant changes to fiscal policy. At least, that’s how I understood his comment.

And, in that regard, I agree with him.

Actually

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:18PM EDT (link)

In this regard, I agree with LH and Daniels. Many people read into that way to much. What he was talking about was really temporary given the urgency of fiscal issues at the time. He has already said that the need of the “truce” has already subsided because much of those pressing fiscal issues have subsided enough to not only be focused on them..

It seems that he was basically saying that fiscal issues should really be the only thing on the board from like mid 08 until about mid 10. I think that few would find disagreement with that kind of obvious logic.

Again folks read into that statement way to much. If abortions start rising 50% year over year all of a sudden, trust me I would be more than okay with a “truce” to go tackle social issues only for a short period of time.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 

No pro-lifer with conviction would have made the statement.

jerry39 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 3:05PM EDT (link)

Its that simple. The words themselves can be spun for sure, but what the statement says about the individuals mindset can never be undone.

Excuse Me I'm Confused

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 3:10PM EDT (link)

nt

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 

I disagree.

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 7:29PM EDT (link)

I’m pro-life–but I’m also realistic. Putting social issues on the front burner loses a good part of the Independent vote and plays into the opposition’s hands. As we saw in the recent election, stressing fiscal issues wins over independents. This didn’t mean those elected weren’t pro-lifers. It meant they just didn’t get strident about social issues–which merely tends to stir up resentment without winning votes. The irony is we can have it all–if we play it cooler.

Wrong writeblock

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:45PM EDT (link)

No one that I am aware of is trying to put Social Issues on the front burner. Most are acknowledging that it can’t be on the back burner. It just needs to be a part of the bigger picture. Conservatives are capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time. Try winning any elections without the SoCons. The “Independents” have not thrown the SoCons under the bus, except a few. Ask Stupak if throwing the abortion issue under the bus is a winning issue. Ask the many so-called Blue Dogs that joined with Stupak if throwing pro-life was a good tactic for the Dems.

Very Well Put

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:56PM EDT (link)

I couldn’t have answered that better myself.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 

Disagree...

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 9:36PM EDT (link)

It’s no secret the social issues can unnecessarily alienate a lot of independents. So it’s politically expedient sometimes to downplay these. It doesn’t mean we must give up our beliefs or try to win elections without the participation of social conservatives. It means social conservatives–if they want real power–must do what;s necessary to gain it. That means not triggering deep resentments in a good part of the electorate. It’s far better to be the guy who downplays the social issues while running for office but gets to cut off funding for Planned Parenthood once elected, than the guy who made a big deal of pro-life during an election but loses in the process. Right now the public is focused on fiscal conservatism. We need to keep the focus on that. The rest will follow once we’re elected in 2012.

Actually, the public is also focused on the unconstitutional

davesinsanantonio (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 5:27AM EDT (link)

grab for power over individual lives. That also should be part of the “running” package. Then, the so-called social issues can be sold after the election as part of the liberty issue. Or, the candidate/president can just let Congress pass whatever is necessary and sign it without too much ballyhoo, and not give red meat to the opposition against his/her re-election.
Just because you are for something, doesn’t mean you have to trumpet it so loudly that you scare off those who are less concerned with it at the time. We need to nominate someone who has solid conservative/Constitutional principles, and then elect him/her and a whole lot of CongressCritters for the needed support, and then get down to the hard work of de-funding, de-regulating, and overturning until the ship of state is back on the right course. Part of that is to put abortion and other such issues back to the states where they always belonged, reversing the course of federal usurpations that has been the country’s history for far too long.

Planks for presidential success

doubledok Monday, December 20th at 12:21PM EDT (link)

1. Secure Borders
2. Expel Illegal Aliens including “anchor babies” – bounty on each tip
3. Reverse union stranglehold with RTW laws first
4. Drug war of substance- start with NASPER (electronic reporting of all Rx’s)
5. Fair Tax – learn about it and there are no holes www.fairtax.org
6. Tort Reform of a severe and substantive nature
7. Neutralize nuclear threats in collaboration with like-minded states
8. Operational transparency & professionalism that will make wiki-leaks NBD
9. Balanced budget & debt retirement – see Fair Tax – makes it pretty automatic.
10. Dismantle the nanny state – no welfare without drug test, limit funding for subsequent dependents acquired while on welfare, SS deconstruction in phases, no benefit to non-citizens, prosecute “sanctuaries”.
11. Phase-out the Electoral College so that a North Dakota vote = a NY vote.
12. Allow no industrial or chemical process to generate residue not found in nature at their process location. Limit that to the same amount found locally. Force clean-up by current operators within 20 months.

Yeah, yeah – lots of people will vote against this – most of them will learn to love the result or be deported or deport themselves. The most attractive part of the Fair Tax is that Congress no longer can give away lobbyist-steered favors. Second most attractive is that tax money becomes a finite resource for the first time on 150 years. Deficit spending should frist come from compenstation to those members of Congress that voted for it, their staff slaries, their pensions, their campaign funds – problem solved!

Never delude yourself.

The_Gadfly (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 12:51PM EDT (link)

Congress can ALWAYS find a way to give away lobbyist steered favors.

That’s why voters need to watch them like a hawk and pounce whenever they try.

And don’t screw around with the Electoral college. It was the best compromise the Big states and Little states could achieve over 200 years ago and nobody has improved on it yet. Every state gets one vote yields tyranny of the minority. Every person gets one vote yields tyranny of mob rule. It’s the tyrannies that need to be avoided.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Palin is no guarantee to run IF...

NickLevi86 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:41PM EDT (link)

Another solid conservative is in the race. She said that.

Pence may just be a house member, but a Palin endorsement would shoot his viability through the roof! I think his positions in House leadership, especially while remaining a solid conservative, are more than enough to satisfy those who demand “governing experience.”

I’d vote for him.

“Any love letter is incomplete without a Ronald Reagan quote”
–my sophomore year roommate

www.robbinsblog.wordpress.com

Good comment NickLevi

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 4:20PM EDT (link)

I agree. There will always be some who believe that someone is unelectable for varying reasons, and some are valid. Coming from the House isn’t one of them, in the current Tea Party political climate. I took EE’s meaning to be just that. With some candidates they can be very electable if enough support is thrown behind them for who they are, and what they represent, rather than on continuing to buy into old time political conventional wisdom. These are not conventional times by any stretch. As Glenn Beck says, and in this case rightfully so, the paradigm is shifting.

 

Palin shouldn't run if ...

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 3:57PM EDT (link)

she actually made this statement:
“Another solid conservative is in the race. She said that.”

I am sure a conservative will be RUNNING. Will they WIN is the question. How do we get to our goal – a conservative nominee who can beat Obama.

I have previously made the comment that the Texas Speaker Race is a ‘grassroots’ versus ‘establishment’ race. It’s wise of Erick both to note the establishment / grassroots dynamic, but also wise to see these as orthogonal and not always competing interests. You can satisfy both constituencies – don’t have a tin ear, don’t ‘cram down’ insider special interest stuff, and have more courage and less rashness OR spinelessness. The establishment/status quo/insider crowd is about winning and governing pragmatically, the grassroots is about winning conservative victories and listening to the people. You CAN do all of the above – viz. Reagan.

But who can do all that?

For 2012, Palin is the “it” person for much of the Tea Party grassroots, BUT her general electability has been called into question by the establishment side. Palin as the nominee will have to answer 2 questions: Can she win? Can she govern? Those are the questions she has to answer to win the nomination.

If Palin runs, with her 25% of the primary vote almost already there, she will ‘crowd out’ other conservatives, suck the oxygen out of the room for them, and it will actually more likely that is become a Palin v Romney race, and more likely that Romney is the nominee, for the simple reason that he’ll be the nearing ‘non-Palin’ option.

In simple terms, Palin running would mean the nominee will either be Palin or a less-conservative choice.

OTOH, Palin not running enables her to be king-maker. A Palin endorsement would be worth gold, and would almost assuredly make the endorsee a putative front-runner, at least among the conservative 2/3rds of the GOP primary electorate (enough to win).

Mike Pence has a stronger set of conservative credientials than most of the possible candidates, from Romney to Huckabee to even Gov Palin herself. As such, Mike Pence running makes Palin’s endorsement choice easy, unless another high-profile true conservative jumps in. If Barbour and Jindhal are both out, Pence would be it.

Excellent analysis Freedoms Truth

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 5:34PM EDT (link)

and I want to believe that Palin wants what is best for the country. As you said, and has been widely carried by many, Palin will step aside if there is another credible conservative candidate in the race. I’d say it is unlikely that Jindal will run, and Barbour has already all but alienated the SoCons with his comments, similar to Daniels, that the SoCons need to allow the fiscal conservatives to run the show. I find it interesting that Barbour hasn’t gotten the blow back that Daniels did with his “truce” comments. Guaranteed those comments will come back to haunt Barbour in a presidential run. Also, as to Barbour, he was the head of the RNC when Gingrich did his Contract with America. That is all well and fine. Problem is that Gingrich folded on that Contract, I believe in less than a year, and it folded like a cheap tent. Many that follow politics do remember that. Is it Barbours fault what Gingrich did, no, but many know it became a false promise. Additionally, how many now have any respect for the RNC with Steele at the head of it. With such a low reputation of the RNC at this point, it can unfairly tag Barbour as a part of something not so good. How long does anyone think the voters memories are? Maybe 3 days?

All of the elements of the Contract

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 5:41PM EDT (link)

Came up for a vote. Most of what was killed was done so by the Senate or vetoed. Get you’re history straight. The signatories all brought those things to a vote and all voted for them. That is what it was designed for. It can’t guarantee that Republicans that didn’t sign onto it, or Dems will be in agreement.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

I was talking in particular

Scope (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 9:04AM EDT (link)

about the government shutdown that was called off by Newt. Have we not all been praying for a government shutdown over these past few weeks? Haven’t many believed that a government shut down in the next congress would be a good thing in getting the Libs to go along with a much smaller budget, and the tax rate extension without the 13 additional months of unemployment, and all the add ons. Are we not screaming that the R’s not compromise with the Libs, as we are always the losers in those battles. These Libs are not compromisers as Clinton was to a degree.

Well

wonkish1 (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 9:27AM EDT (link)

The government shutdown actually succeeded in getting Clinton to come to the table and make a serious attempt to cut spending.

Clinton blinked not the other way around because he acted like no cuts had to be made in the budget in 95. The GOP called his bluff, and he came to the table. Now granted the GOP didn’t get everything it wanted in budget cuts, but they did get serious budget cuts. Without the budget stand off in 95 you don’t get the budget surpluses in 99 and 00.

Also, the contract advocated a balanced budget amendment. That actually failed by only 1 vote in the senate. It was actually Newt and the GOP signatories, “Hey, even if it didn’t pass we are still going to set this country on a path towards balancing the budget.” And they succeeded in doing that.

If the GOP has the cajones to be that tough again, you wont find me complaining. Even if they don’t score enough budget cuts to wipe out most of the deficit this next year, if they can at least set it up to be balanced in a couple of years they did there job.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 
 
 
 
 
 

Add Palin, to the Pence ticket...

harpu Monday, December 20th at 9:54AM EDT (link)

And THEY go a very long way!

 

Add Palin, to the Pence ticket...

harpu Monday, December 20th at 9:54AM EDT (link)

And THEY go a very long way!

I'd go with that ticket harpu

Scope (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 10:09AM EDT (link)

as long as Pence is on the top of the ticket. Just as the O gave O”biden the job of overseeing the stimulus (what a joke), Pence could put Palin in charge of our energy policy. I don’t think she would go for it though. As Fred Thompson once said, the biggest job of the VP is attending funerals for foreign dignitaries in far away places.

No. . . Palin as kingmaker and she runs for

doubledok Monday, December 20th at 12:36PM EDT (link)

Senator from AK. Shoe-in to becoem Majority Leader or Whip. She will ascend to the ticket in 2016 as VP, at least – in an electable potential.

She needs to have an arena where she can wipe-out the gaffs of the 2008 VP run and the non-executive image being generated currently. Kate gosselin hurt Sarah Palin more than it hurt the already decrepit Gosselin. What’s next, Octo-Mom travelog on the Hadj? “Nine Souls to Mecca – How I sold my tax-supported children to the media for attention while I collected US welfare in Saudi Arabia”. Actually – that would be a great propaganda piece for the Tea Party. . .

 
 
 

Yep

leehazel Monday, December 20th at 12:53PM EDT (link)

You are absolutely right, Luger is an idiot who looks far to much like another Bayh.

Ooops

leehazel Monday, December 20th at 12:54PM EDT (link)
 
 
 

Running for Governor v. Running for President

Ben Domenech (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 12:38PM EDT (link)

I just don’t see Pence not running for governor in Indiana. He’s a young guy, relatively, and House members just don’t win.

I agree, however, that he’s an ideal candidate for this cycle.

He Would Make One Hell

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 12:44PM EDT (link)

of a great governor. And the transition from Mitch Daniels to him is literally perfect. I would like him running for President, but the sure bet of governor just seems a little more realistic.

Plus as a matter of diversification we need an adequate bench for future presidential cycles, and Pence is a shoe in after he becomes governor.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Well, Becky Skillman will be running, too.

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:13PM EDT (link)

Personally, I’d prefer Pence to Skillman as Governor. But I’m sure that Daniels will throw his support behind his Lt. Governor — and I have to imagine that will carry a lot of weight.

What I’d *really* like to see is Pence take on Lugar in a Senate primary. But, then, he’s already passed on an easier Senate race….so I can’t imagine he’d go for a more difficult one.

 

IN is really hogging all of the good Govs

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:50AM EDT (link)

@ Daniels or Pence, if you’re reading RS: AZ is nice and warm (and bereft of good leadership), if you’re interested!

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

South Carolina

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:24AM EDT (link)

Is running away with that one too.

Mark Sanford used to be one of my absolute fav’s until he threw it all away. But Nikki Haley is also looking pretty dang good as well.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 
 
 

Pence himself said

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:26PM EDT (link)

that he has been encouraged to run for the Governorship, but that he has been really really encouraged to run for the Presidency. I tried to find the article where I read that but can’t locate it right now.

Justice Souter also said- “I personally encourage Mike to run for the Presidency. I think he could be the sleeper candidate.”

The speeches that Pence has been giving are geared toward the Presidency rather than as a Governor. His speech at Hillsdale College was about the office of the Presidency. His speech before an economics club was also geared more toward federal fiscal policy, rather than state fiscal policy.

We shall see.

Now There's a Great Endorsement

edintexas Friday, December 17th at 3:09PM EDT (link)

Justice Souter “encourages” Pence to run. Hmmm, what are we Conservatives to make of a Progressive like Souter (yes, I know he was nominated by a Republican President, hardly the first – or last – gross error in judicial picks by Republicans) endorsing Pence?

 
 

I'd vote for Pence

peg_c (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 5:06PM EDT (link)

Also, unless it’s DeMint (and he’s given no indication of wanting to run), I won’t vote for a Senator. Senators have proven lately to be nothing but nightmare and disaster.

Maybe Pence will run for gov. with a run for pres. to follow if successful. Hard to imagine Indiana would not elect him gov.

I agree backing from Palin would be gold. THAT is her dynamite – being a kingmaker.

Government cannot be the solution when government is the problem.

We'd all vote for him--if he won in the primaries.

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 7:06PM EDT (link)

But he won’t win. He’s not a particularly happy warrior. He’s got a somewhat dour temperament and is not that impressive as a speaker. Neither is his resume impressive enough to make us feel secure in perilous times.

I still think Rudy’s our best bet in a time when executive experience, fiscal conservatism and an ability to articulate the issues–combined with a celebrated national presence–would carry the day. People want to feel secure. Rudy’s been there. He was in the lion’s den long before Chris Christie–and succeeded much the same way–by fighting the system. Pence can’t supply that sense of know-how or provide that security, no matter how conservatively “correct” he is on the issues. He still seems like a lightweight, given his dearth of experience.

Are you looking at the same Mike Pence we are?

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:18PM EDT (link)

Before anyone else, Mike Pence sees a great American comeback. He knows Americas exceptionalism, and shouts it. He does believe that America can be the best country once again. I really don’t think any further comment is necessary to your post. You are just making stuff up, and not doing a good job of it. If you have problems with his policies, then state them. Saying he is dour is an opinion you may have, but, has no basis in reality. You are clearly trying to find something some argument against Pence, and you are far short of the target.
Rudy- Hahahahahaha. Not on the best day.

Pence is great, if you remember only 3 senators have ever been elected to POTUS.

ladyimpactohio (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:29PM EDT (link)

Kennedy, Harding and now Obama. The rest have been military men or governors or other. Pence declined to give a “yes or no” at CPAC last year. I would vote for him in a heartbeat. He has morals and integrity. These times call for extraordinary measures and candidates. I believe Pence fits all of these.

We the people tell government what to do, it does not tell us.–Ronald Reagan in his farewell speech

You forgot Lincoln

dajeeps (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 12:48AM EDT (link)

He was in the House and went straight to POTUS. Of course that was a different age, but it did happen during a period of political upheaval. That upheaval was probably a few degrees more serious than it is today, but it likely has the same root cause – mass political arrogance by the slavery expansionists in his day, and likewise by radical socialists in ours. Odd things happen when the tide changes, and so I won’t place my bet by what has happened in recent memory.

…”I would quarrel with both parties and with every individual of each, before I would subjugate my understanding, or prostitute my tongue or pen to either.”
–John Adams

James A. Garfield ONLY incumbent of House to win Presidency. nt

audax (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 5:01AM EDT (link)

Audeamus pro audere est facere

 

Also

freemanja1991 (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 1:23PM EDT (link)

4 Major Party Candidate and All you needed to carry was the north. And he was a one term Congressman.

 
 
 

What am I making up? Be specific.

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 7:51PM EDT (link)

I thought his performance during the GOP meeting with Obama this summer was not impressive. And how is his resume impressive? Has he got a record of reform? Has he worked in high office under Reagan? Has he got any kind of executive experience worth mentioning? If not–how am I making things up?

It’s the presidency of the United States we’re talking about,. Merely having the right conservative credentials is not enough. He’s got to transmit to a mass electorate a lot more than he can. I have no problem with him on the issues–but so what? Does he understand economics, does he have executive skills, is he temperamentally able to function in a major crisis? It’s not enough to make speeches–I’d like more assurances than he seems to be able to give.

 
 

Rudy? Really?

The_Gadfly (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 1:02PM EDT (link)

You really think we should be taking advice from somebody who thinks that anyone who polled as badly as Rudy did in the last primary should be the leader this time around?

Rudy immediately loses the SoCon block just like he did last time. After that he can’t win. To win the Republican nomination you need to win both SoCon and FiCon. To win the general election, having held those two you need to add just enough of the libertarian vote to win.

That Appears

wonkish1 (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 1:15PM EDT (link)

to be the most basic description of what is the case.

I should add that while most independents I believe think like Libertarians(they wouldn’t call themselves that). And they aren’t passionate about politics at all like self identified libertarians are.

I think independents primarily are just people that want to be left alone on everything and just want performance from their governments. That is mostly it.

That said independents also usually vote in platitudes based on whatever slogans define a campaign, so don’t put to much stake in how independents are ideologically.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 
 
 
 
 

He shouldn't bother

freemanja1991 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 12:39PM EDT (link)

I saw him speak at the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition Dinner, In Des Moines in August, and will say I was impressed with Pence, and grateful for the Congressman Latham to give me the opportunity to go and sit with him at his table. But having said that he is a member of the house meaning his chances are less than 1%. He should Run for governor of Indiana, but he is an idiot if he even tries to run for President. Although he did make a great number of friends at the IFFC Dinner. His speech was defiantly a vote stealer from Huckabee.

Agreed.

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:14PM EDT (link)

I was (and still am) a fan of Duncan Hunter, too. Of all the 2008 candidates, he was the one who stood out to me as most closely representing the way I feel.

But House members don’t get elected president. Why that is, I don’t know. But they just don’t.

(Of course, Senators usually don’t either….and we all know how 2008 turned out).

Lack of stature, lack of executive experience ...

acat (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 3:05PM EDT (link)

Most house members aren’t nationally known… so they have to spend some of their time gaining in stature… then there’s the whole ‘what bills did you support and what all was buried in them’ mess.

Most house members also don’t have a lot of executive experience.. although they seem to have more than their fellow travelers in the senate…. more small business folk in the house for some reason.

What Pence has that we haven’t seen recently is media savvy. As a former talk show host, he (and Herman Cain) have more practice talking to and taking questions from a potentially hostile audience. Pence has the conservative ideological chops as well .. he knows not only what he believes, but why, and he can explain it.

There’s some skills involved in being in front of the crowd that have been absent from the Republican side for some time… the last POTUS nom with serious media savvy I can recall did pretty well.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

I agree...This cycle's Duncan Hunter.

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 5:33PM EDT (link)

By the way–where’s Rudy on this list?

This cycle's James Garfield without the assassin. nt

pilgrim (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 5:49PM EDT (link)

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

If you can actually say Pence is this years Duncan Hunter

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:23PM EDT (link)

than you know not much about Duncan Hunter or Mike Pence. There is no comparison at all whatsoever. You are just a shill for Rudy. He isn’t running last time I checked, and, with his campaign last time, he shouldn’t.

You missed my point.

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 8:08PM EDT (link)

Both are congressmen; both are good conservatives. But just as Hunter went nowhere, so will Pence.

How am I a shill for Rudy any more than you’re a shill for Pence? We’re expressing opinions here–and I expressed mine. And I wouldn’t count Rudy out of the game either, not just yet, not if we want a superior candidate, somebody with credentials who brings a superior resume to the table.

Sure he ran a poor campaign last time around–but he was also screwed royally by the system. When was the last time somebody from places like PA or NJ–states where the polls showed Rudy far ahead of the pack–got the same shot at a nominee in the primaries as somebody from IA or SC? By the time I got to vote it was all over.

Why do we expect a New Yorker to score big with farmers and evangelicals anyway–or act surprised if somebody like Huckabee does? Isn’t it about time we let some of the rest of us from blue states get a say? The system stinks–it’s geared for the good old boys and it’s time we changed it. Rudy ran ahead of Zero and Hillary in the national polls–but he couldn’t pass muster with Dr. Dobson. So we got Obama elected instead. How smart was that?

Yes, your are correct writeblock

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:54PM EDT (link)

I am a shill for Pence. If Rudy was a superior candidate, as you say, he would have been the candidate, with a superior resume. No? How was he screwed royally by the system? He ran a bad and misfired campaign. End of story. If you can’t run a campaign, you sure can’t run the federal government.

I don't accept your premise.

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 9:52PM EDT (link)

In fact the way the last election played out should make it clear we made a major mistake not giving the nod to Rudy who was polling ahead of Obama in major blue states and in all the purple states. If the GOP hadn’t been run by moderates, we’d have had a different primary system to begin with and Rudy might have had a better chance.

Imo he ran in the wrong year. This time around he’s the perfect fit. An executive genius, plenty of media savvy, terrific knowledge of economics, tremendously articulate, a hero under pressure on 9/11, a Reaganite who, like Reagan himself, is outside the establishment.–perfect.

Comparing Pence to him is ridiculous. Can Pence rally a nation in a crisis? Can he decide questions of war and peace? Can he handle the media? Who knows? All I see is a guy who looks glum most of the time. Pence says nice things–but again, so what? He’s way over his head in his ambition it seems to me.

p.s.

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 10:05PM EDT (link)

Rudy doesn’t have to prove anything by running a campaign. He’s already achieved much more than that. He’s already cut taxes, balanced a budget bigger than most states, consolidated agencies, cut crime drastically, jailed corrupt politicians, sent the heads of the Mafia five families to prison, fought the liberal NY media, stood his ground against NY race hustlers, fought the unions–you name it, he’s done it. He also became a national hero on 9/11. To me he’s like Churchill. He’s the one guy capable of leading the country out of its present fiscal crisis. If the nation wants a guy who can do it, he’s the man. If it wants another saintly social conservative without a resume, then Pence might do. But he’s not the man for what we’re facing.

Well .. that was .. different.

acat (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:16AM EDT (link)

Look, I get that you’re a New Yorker who’s pissed that his boy Rudy didn’t make it to the show.

I agree – Rudy would have kicked Obama’s arse in New York… but ya gotta remember, it’s a *national* election. Just because Rudy does great on Broadway don’t mean he’ll play in Peoria…

I’m really surprised Rudy screwed this up. I mean, the primary system hasn’t significantly changed in a while… just getting out of NYC and going to talk to the religious leaders ought to have been obvious to Rudy’s campaign manager. I don’t know what he was thinking here.

As for Pence’s resume, I’d normally agree that the lack of a “jacket” is a problem, but .. Pence does have one. He’s been in the private sector, in a tough job – you try dealing with angry callers – and he’s got the conservative – Fiscal conservative, mind – ideology to back it up.

Has he done everything Rudy did? Of course not! Rudy, though, needs to fire his campaign manager and get a new guy, someone who can run a national campaign…

Ironically, Rudy and Palin are in similar boats – he’s reaching out to the religious leaders while she’s reaching out to the independents.

Hmmm. Giuliani/Palin ticket, anyone? Anyone?

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

I'm from PA, not NY...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 2:21PM EDT (link)

And yes, I’m pissed–but mainly because the country is suffering greatly as a result of short-sighted social conservatives who don’t understand politics and demand too much purity–even from guys from big blue states–guys like Brown and Giuliani. These same people are pushing Pence, a guy with no credentials and a gloomy demeanor. On what basis? What has he achieved? Haven’t we learned anything from the past? The system shut out Giuliani. It gave us Obama and socialism.

Btw, Rudy did talk to religious leaders during the primary season and even got the backing of Robertson who understood the stakes. He leaned over backwards promising to nominate, if elected, strict constructionists. But the social conservatives wanted somebody purer. They went ga-ga over Huckabee. They ended up with McCain–and then Obama, the most pro-abortion president in history. So what did purity achieve in the end? Politics shouldn’t be about purity, it should be about winning. That’s how power is achieved. It’s not achieved by backing lightweights like Pence.

I agree Rudy and Palin are in similar boats–but whereas she can get the nomination but might very well lose the election, he can’t seem to get the nomination but would make a helluva strong candidate. He polls terrifically in places like PA and NJ–any one of which would give us the presidency. Yet nobody puts him on a list–despite the fact that every time he speaks to the media on a hot issue our side is left wondering how a guy so accomplished and articulate ever got lost in the shuffle.

So .. McCain is your idea of "purity" ?

acat (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 4:54PM EDT (link)

Really not sure why you think McCain’s a purist…. he’s not. He was the “my turn” candidate, and we ended up with him because Rudy and the Huckster and Fred! pulled the true believers (in their respective ideologies) letting McLame get the nom.

I haven’t met anyone who was happy with McCain, but .. Rudy’s loss is his own fault, not the SoCons, not the libertarians, Rudy. He started late, and relied too much on his 9/11 stature .. maybe that’s still a big deal on the east coast, but elsewhere by 2007 it was “Rudy who?”.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

I Was a Rudy Supporter in 08

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 5:11PM EDT (link)

Up until I started taking seriously the threats of a third party candidate by folks like Dobson. Then I almost through my hands in the air and went, “%$%#, we are dead, all the options suck.”

Rudy probably could have done more earlier in his campaign. I have never been one that appreciated folks dodging and deflecting a particular issue because they feel that anytime it gets brought up it makes them look bad. And all of those guys were doing it, Rudy too. He really should have gotten out in front of it, signed contracts with religious leaders, you name it. I think a level of honesty and candor about your short comings in the past and a much more serious effort to commit to what he was willing to do on social issues probably could have gone a lot farther than what he was doing.

That said this year there is a lot of better choices than Rudy, Pence being one of them.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Pence is no way a better choice.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:03PM EDT (link)

He has a weak resume. Rudy reformed NYC, proved his mettle as a leader who could rally the nation on 9/11, jailed the heads of the Mafia, sent corrupt Wall Street billionaires to prison, fired deadwood bureaucrats and consolidated agencies, cut taxes in a thousand ways, privatized municipal properties, cut crime astronomically and then showed other cities around the country how to do it, fought the race hustlers, fought the unions, fought the NYTimes and the liberal media–did it all–except win over purists in the GOP who were looking for a saintly minister instead of a competent president with genius executive skills who would have fought hard for the conservative agenda–even the part he disagreed with. Pence is a non-starter to anybody with common sense about politics. But then again, a lot of the rank and file who are big on social issues lack common sense when it comes to politics. They don’t understand it’s all about winning. Without power you accomplish nothing. And without a candidate who appeals to a broader spectrum than the farmers in Iowa and the evangelicals in South Carolina and the villagers of New Hampshire, you achieve nothing. Rudy didn’t have the farmers–but he brought into the picture millions in places like NJ and PA–who are, as usual, left out of the process as the GOP has arranged it. It’s a stupid process and needs to be reformed–and will be.

writeblock- If it's all about winning

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:18PM EDT (link)

why did your messiah not get anywhere in 2008. You are very quick to blame the SoCons, because they are nothing more than idiots, who don’t know nothin’ about nothin’. You are so locked still in the 08 election that I’m not sure that you are even aware that it is now 2010. I suspect that if any diaries are put up about any other candidates, you will do the same. I really do suspect that Pence is not your gripe, it is more that anyone who is not Rudy baby will be your gripe. I haven’t heard anything about him running in 2012? Have you?

A Rudybot on our hands?

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:26PM EDT (link)

nt

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

yeah gekster

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:50PM EDT (link)

really. He is not running to my knowledge in 2012, yet this guy is still living in 2008, and trying to bash everyone who didn’t put his guy over the top. His posts are getting more and more bizzare.

Ya know Scope,

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:54PM EDT (link)

in the two + years I’ve been here, I know of no one to push Rudy like this.
Maybe he’s his chief if staff?

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

Not to be unkind gekster

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 8:12PM EDT (link)

but I am getting the feeling that this guy hasn’t moved beyond 2008 yet. Shoot, I thought my world truly ended when Fred Thompson quit the race. I know many felt the same. All of us Fredheads moved along, but, this Guilanihead can’t seem to understand that it’s a different day, with new possibilities. And, he is shilling for someone that, so far as I know, has no intention to run again, No?

You are never unkind.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 8:21PM EDT (link)

One of the things I like about you.
Even when you seam mad, you are still nice about it.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

Thank you gekster

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:27PM EDT (link)

I can’t say too much more than that because you have me choked up. Now tonight I won’t be able to sleep because I’m gonna worry that Harry is going to sneak back on the Senate floor, and, he will pass the DREAM Act all by himself. They give me the willies those dang Democrats. Thank you brother, you have no idea how much your comment means to me. I didn’t say I would take all your snow away, just a few inches.

 
 
 
 
 
 

I've explained why. Read the above posts.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:35PM EDT (link)

You haven't explained diddly squat writeblock

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:59PM EDT (link)

about Pence, or your infatuation with Rudy baby. You’ve surely told us why Pence is such a bad candidate, in your own words, but, your own words are nothing more than your opinion. I’ve asked just what Pence has said that you can tag downer to his statements, nothin’, no answer from you yet as to those downer words. You are grasping, or should I say gasping at this point. Give it up already. You have nothing to bring forward. All you keep doing is pimping your boy Rudy. And, he isn’t even running in 2012.

read my posts again.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 8:36PM EDT (link)

If you can’t comprehend my reasoning about Pence, take a reading comprehension course.

 
 
 
 

Yeah

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:28PM EDT (link)

But if it is all about winning, then you are just going to have to deal with the fact that SoCons aren’t going to vote for him.

A desire to look at Rudy because he is electable cannot just be a situation of how many independents or soft Dems a person can get. You have to deal in the reality that the person has to be tolerable by all of the Republican electorate.

You act as though the reality is that winning is only about scoring the middle. Well allow me to give you a new reality, you need all of the elements of the base, too; Deal With It!

Either you find yourself a pragmatist or you don’t. You can’t only be a pragmatist in the general, and than b**** and moan during the primary. I’m sorry it doesn’t work that way.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

wonkish- He isn't even posting in good faith at this point

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 8:03PM EDT (link)

he is just shilling for what could have been, if he had his choice, back in 2008. The entire political atmosphere at this time is far different that it was in 2008.

A tribble for some one not even in a campaign.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 8:08PM EDT (link)

tribblelite?

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 

You've got a lot of nerve...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 8:32PM EDT (link)

to suggest I’m not posting in good faith. I’ve made some solid arguments. You’ve posted none–except to insult and ridicule. You’re acting more like a liberal democrat–that’s their schtick. It’s an Alinsky tactic I believe.

Psst, you're not helping your cause

Neil Stevens (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 8:36PM EDT (link)

I haven’t read the thread. I just read the above two posts, and somebody I’ve never heard of calling out a proven regular is what I see.

Stop digging.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Then don't take sides...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 9:04PM EDT (link)

…read the posts first.

Way to confirm the theory

Neil Stevens (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:49PM EDT (link)

Looks like Scope is right. You’re here to cause trouble.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 
 
 
 
 

Winning is about counting the votes...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 8:28PM EDT (link)

And there’s not many votes among villagers in NH or farmers in IA. There are plenty of votes in SC–but no matter who we nominated, they weren’t going to Obama. In short, the point was to nominate somebody who could attract a lot of voters outside the South which we had locked up anyway–and outside the prairie and mountain states that always vote Republican. The only states that should have mattered in terms of winning the presidency–were the battleground states–places like PA and NJ and OH and FL. That’s still going to be true–and it’ll be true in the future. It’s been true ever since the country entered this cold civil war we’re in. This means we must win over independents–and states that are purple–and a blue state or two. We don’t need to win over red states. They’ll be with us no matter who we nominate. So it makes political sense to nominate a guy who polled well in those states, who was loved by millions who live in blue and purple states and could bring them into the picture and make us real contenders. It still makes plenty of sense.

Again You're Not Getting It

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 8:45PM EDT (link)

Exactly counting the votes. And when primary time came Giuliani didn’t get them. You can’t just line up and say, hey we need someone that performs well in purple states so we need to pick someone palatable in those areas. You also need to find someone that is going to do well in the primary, too.

Now, I can b**** and moan about voters in x state, or x state not going for a conservative candidate and you can b**** and moan about Giuliani who would do well in the general, not doing well in the primaries. But what you don’t get it is that b****** and moaning isn’t going to get you anywhere. You just have to come to deal with reality in everything.

I figured that statement would appeal to you because you seem concerned about the realities of general elections well take it one step further there are realities in primaries, too. Deal With It!!! You can’t just scream and throw a tantrum every time you don’t get your way.

If you are going to act like a pragmatist(which is the way you define people that are only interested about winning in a general election) then you actually need to take into account all of reality, not just the pieces you want.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

You'd be right, IF...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 9:07PM EDT (link)

The system weren’t rigged. When did my PA vote count the same as some farmer’s from Iowa?

Also...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 9:12PM EDT (link)

You need to think about how crazy the system is. We run in the primaries in order to appease voters in Iowa and SC–then we lose the main bout–the presidency–because we don’t have a guy who appeals to voters in PA or NJ. What kind of sense does that make? We need to find out who can win in major battlegrounds like PA and OH–not who can win in little unimportant NH or IA.

Again

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:30PM EDT (link)

You still aren’t getting it. It is what it is. Either you figure out way to get a change in the primary structure, or you have to realize the reality you are in.

See, I am absolutely surprised that someone who wanted Rudy to win out of a pragmatic desire to win a general isn’t getting it into their head. If you are going to be a preacher of reality than you have to be a preacher of all reality. Rudy didn’t win the primaries, Rudy will always have an uphill battle in the primaries whenever he chooses to run. The primary system has clearly given a few states a huge advantage over others.

Either you move on and work within that reality or there is absolutely no reason why anybody should listen to “realism” about the general. You aren’t being consistent.

Now either whine all day and nobody will care about your general election advice. Or start realizing all of the realities out there(including those in the primaries) and maybe people would take you a little more seriously. But you can’t be a whiner about the primary and a realist about the general that just makes you look pathetic.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

I believe the lesson has been learned.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 10:08PM EDT (link)

The primaries I understand will result in contenders getting their appropriate portion of the vote. It’ll prolong the primary season, but give other states a shot at choosing the nominee.

What frosts me most, though, is the assumption around here that all conservatives are in lockstep–or ought to be–regarding certain candidates. I’m a pro-lifer, yes. But I see the situation differently from somebody in SC or IA. I understand life is sacred–and it’s precisely because of that I want to win in the general election–and not just in the primaries. I want somebody who will be a plausible candidate, not just somebody who passes muster for Americans like us. I want the candidate to have broad appeal–and that means underplaying the social issues which really set the teeth of a lot of otherwise conservative independents on edge.

This doesn’t btw mean nominating moderates like McCain. It means nominating conservatives who downplay social conservatism and emphasize what they have in common with independent fiscal conservatives. But some of you around here wear your Christianity on your sleeves. You make too big a noise about an issue that should be quietly understood. The point should be to gain power, not to win debating points. The left understands this better than we. It underplays its own ideology–which is far more extreme than ours–by emphasizing what it has in common with the broader electorate.

Eww,

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:38PM EDT (link)

Its like you have a death wish on here. Should I just give up trying to convince you to maybe be a little less biting in your written opinions.

I mean really, that comment is not going to sit well on this site. And its like you don’t care if you piss off and insult some folks.

Again, I am strongly recommending that you cool off, and come back when you are a little more willing to play nice.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Why should a healthy exhange of ideas...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 11:15PM EDT (link)

be threatening to some of you or be considered “biting.” Think about it. It’s a difference of opinion, strongly expressed–just as your opinions have been strongly expressed. Comments like my being a liar, not being in good faith, having a senior moment, making stuff up–all stated strongly by some–are ignored. Why then should my comments in rebuttal be considered out of line? Do you insist all conservatives should think alike at all times? Must all have the same degree of enthusiasm about the same issues and the same people in lockstep? Is this a discussion forum for conservatives generally–or only for Pence admirers?

Nope

wonkish1 (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 12:32AM EDT (link)

First, think about it once. Some folks just went after you. You have said some things that go after an entire community of people on here. The only reason why you aren’t getting 20 posts beating on you right now is because 99% of Redstate has moved on from this thread.

I’m telling you to think more judiciously about how you go about making comments on a forum that is comprised of a lot of SoCons. You aren’t going to get anywhere with anybody if you insult them because they are going to come at you hard(as they should) and then everybody else is going to move into defend them.

If you consider yourself a pragmatist maybe you should think about applying that standard to how you communicate with fellow GOP voters. I mean what did you think was going to happen, you would come onto the site and your brilliant insulting words were going to convince all of the SoCons to give up on being SoCons? I mean please, you can’t possibly be that stupid.

Now I definitely do appreciate the healthy exchange of ideas(I actually love it), but it also rests on the word “Healthy”. By healthy do we mean courteous and respectful well of course its a good thing. By “Healthy” do we mean insulting and deliberately controversial for the sake of being controversial, then no its not “Healthy Exchange of Ideas”.

Also, I’m trying to help you. And for crying out loud take your damn ego out of this. You have to decide what is more important, your ego or your goals. If its your ego you might as well just leave because your only going to find yourself more aggravated and ticked off. If its your goals then you should seriously start thinking about being more friendly and more judicious in what you say and how you chose to say it.

Also, quite frankly I don’t personally care one bit about your attempts to defend yourself. Your not going to convince me that you are worthy of be taken seriously by trying to justify insulting and biting comments.

If you attempt to rebut this post, I’ll assume that you are choosing your ego over your goals and I’m not going to waste my time with you anymore. This is my last post on here.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

I don't need a lecture on manners...

writeblock Sunday, December 19th at 1:24AM EDT (link)

since you and your friends don’t practice what you preach. Maybe I’ve alienated some–but so what? Why should anybody enter a thread stepping on eggshells? Let’s have a strong give-and-take on ideas without hurling ridicule with the usual piling-on. If I’ve been offensive–so have some of you.

I am awaiting your answer to give proof of a Rudy Presidential run, as you proclaimed to have heard, Mr. writeblock.

gekster (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 1:28AM EDT (link)

What say you.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

And have you considered relocating?

acat (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:04PM EDT (link)

If you really want your vote to count, may I recommend relocating to Dixville Notch, NH? They cast, literally, some of the first votes in the country…

Otherwise, your primary vote in PA is worth about as much as mine in Illinois…. we can vote for the presumptive nominee, or we can vote against… but we can’t really effect the primary .. with our votes.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Rudy could have had the Clinton/Gillibrand Senate seat

Locke (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 5:55PM EDT (link)

if he had had any further interest in elective office, and a good Giuliani campaign for that seat would have had an inestimably positive impact on other races in NY and beyond.

His life is his own and maybe “the former mayor is entrenched in his current lifestyle, sources said. He’s created a multitiered career of speeches, consulting and security work, and a law practice”.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/rudy_nixes_senate_bid_jnUH6xBaBZNqGq8IAyKRzN

My opinion, for what it’s worth.

He doesn't want to do the Senate...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:07PM EDT (link)

for good reason. He’s not a team-player, he’s a leader, an executive, precisely what we should be looking for, not another senator or congressman. Anyway, I hear he’s still interested in running for president. I hope the buzz is true.

Good God writeblock- He's not a team player

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:29PM EDT (link)

gives me the creeps. If he wasn’t a team player he would NEVER have accomplished what he did on 9/11. You are so grasping at straws now, you couldn’t possibly defend your own animosities.

 

writeblock- Are you having a Chrisie Matthews moment

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:31PM EDT (link)

for Rudy?

Another insult. That's about five so far.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:37PM EDT (link)

Try using a reasoned argument. When I say he’s not a team-player, I also underscored his creds as a leader. Of course it goes without saying leaders cooperate with a team. But he LED the team, he didn’t just merge in a group. Big difference.

How about these arguments ...

acat (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:15PM EDT (link)

Rudy does not appear to be running.

If Rudy does run, as I’ve pointed out to you before, he needs to win over the independents and the SoCons .. and clearly his campaign last time screwed the pooch on this one. Just reaching the alleged leadership isn’t enough – the SoCons have some pretty independent tendencies.

If you’re trying to get Rudy to run in 2012, you’re going about it the wrong way. Start by writing a diary, and promote it.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

5

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:18PM EDT (link)

Finally, some common sense.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 

I hear he's running. That's the buzz.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 11:20PM EDT (link)

As for my comments–they’re designed to set up a contrast between a politician who’s achieved something in reality and a guy who’s admired by a lot of fantasizers but has achieved very little.

OK homer,

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 11:27PM EDT (link)

Give some proof besides your say so.
Give me a link or something.
Back up what you say.
Give me something to gnaw on, or I’ll take you as another two bit troll.
It’s up to you now.
And make it in the last 12 months.
Nothing pre 2010.
Nows your chance.
Convince me.
Please.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

Not wanting Pence for pres. makes me a troll?

writeblock Sunday, December 19th at 12:00AM EDT (link)

I’m a conservative with an opinion you don’t like. That; makes it your problem, not mine.

You posted: "I hear he's running. That's the buzz."

gekster (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 12:06AM EDT (link)

All I did was ask for proof.
Plain and simple.
Answer the question or dodge it.
It’s up to you.
And everyone will read my question.
They will also see your response.
So far your response is questioning if I think you are a troll.
Like I said.
It’s up to you.
Game on?

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

kowalski: I've never said nothing about Pence.

gekster (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 12:13AM EDT (link)

so don’t bring it up.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 

It's been 20 minutes writeblock,

gekster (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 12:48AM EDT (link)

got am answer, or just talkin smack.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

It's obvious that writeblock can not answer the simple question I asked, and has proven himself a troll.

gekster (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 1:20AM EDT (link)

I will rescind this statement if and when he shows proof that Rudy Guilliani is thinking about a run for the Presidency.
That is within the last twelve months.
Till then, I call TROLL.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Running for President is never a bad

charliebravoNH (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:25PM EDT (link)

thing, even if you don’t win. You increase your stature and exposure.

Support the PC Strategy Alliance
http://concordproject.org/ http://party.procinct.net/
http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com/

ChBRVNH

It is a bad idea

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:56PM EDT (link)

if you are there for the wrong reasons, and know you have no chance of anything but to take a spot on the stage. Mike Gravel should be the proof of that in 2008.

 
 

I wouldn't count him out completely

dajeeps (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 12:21AM EDT (link)

I believe the paradigm in politics is changing and it may not matter that he’s a member of the House. As far as I can see the choices for a constitutional conservative are pretty slim and this time around my intention is to vote principle; no more holding my nose at the ballot box to further perpetuate the delivery of the lesser of the evils, with little distinction between them, into power.

From what I can see, it is the size of the centralized administrative state that makes it difficult for anyone to manage, even those adept at doing so. But if one is elected to streamline and/or dismantle it instead of simply manage the tyrannical and unwieldy behemoth as is, the qualifications are going to be much different than if we were to pretend the last few years never happened and we were all still asleeep.

I will vote for Pence in the primaries if he decides to run provided he gives me the warm fuzzy that he understands the challenge, that the election and the office won’t be about him, and that he will seek the appropriate people to help him do what needs to be done.

…”I would quarrel with both parties and with every individual of each, before I would subjugate my understanding, or prostitute my tongue or pen to either.”
–John Adams

You get it

haumea (Diary) Tuesday, December 21st at 8:26AM EDT (link)

As the kids say, “this.”

Read Eric S. Raymond’s “Escalating Complexity and the Collapse of Elite Authority” for further elaboration.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1551

It is precisely the point that we need a guy to streamline the state, not to vainly attempt running it.

 
 
 

Mike Pence

rdelbov Friday, December 17th at 12:53PM EDT (link)

is currently my 1st choice. I will not list others who are acceptable as I don’t want to steer the discussion away from Mike.

Just a comment on the “Out Christian” concept. I have been an observor of GOP Presidential campaigns since 1976 or so. Presidential candidates do not have to try “Out Christian” eachother. My expirence has been that Christian voters , like myself, are immune to efforts to candidates to appeal to us on the basis of their Faith. What impacts us is how their faith impacts their life. That helps us-especially in the South-feel comfortable with a candidate.

For instance if a candidate has been through several bitter Marital breakups or if as a parent they faced the illness of a child. Or if they have had a lifetime of devotion to a particular church. Its also how they speak and what words they use.

As I listen to how a candidate speaks I listen for things. If someone says “we are lucky to be Americans” I cringe. I can’t help it as I believe we are blessed by God’s Providence. This is the type of stuff that can’t be faked-you can’t focus group it-there is a way about someone who has had Jesus Christ change their hearts.

True

Goldwater_Conservative (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:20PM EDT (link)

the other way you can really tell is how well they stand up to the gotcha evolution question. Last time I think Huckabee was the only one that stood up to it.

 

I disagree...

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 8:18PM EDT (link)

Personally I’m tired of nice turn-the-other cheek type of guys. I liked Bush–but he wouldn’t defend himself–or us. This time around I don’t want a Christian gentleman, I want a warrior, somebody who will crack skulls, make enemies while pushing through a conservative agenda the same way the left pushes theirs. I want somebody with a real record of achievment, a Daniels, a Barbour, a Giuliani. I dont want an inexperienced nice guy who is right on the issues but poor on performance..

total agreement

charliebravoNH (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:29PM EDT (link)

Support the PC Strategy Alliance
http://concordproject.org/ http://party.procinct.net/
http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com/

ChBRVNH

 

Giuliani

mboyle1988 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 12:55PM EDT (link)

is not a Christian. He supports killing babies and legalizing homosexual unions. Both things are clearly against God’s law. He also divorced for reasons other than sexual immorality, which is also against God’s law. In fact, he committed adultery, which is against God’s law. Giuliani may have gotten stuff done in New York. I don’t care. He’s not a social conservative.

As for your comment, writeblock, about the system not being fair, I’ve got news for you: in the last election, just shy of 50% of votes for John McCain were cast by Evangelical Christians. They ARE the base of the Republican party. They are not a fringe member of the coalition. They are the fastest growing segment of the American electorate (yes, growing faster than even the Latinos). It is impossible to win the Republican nomination without their support.

No Republican nominee for president will ever be pro-abortion or pro-gays again, and thank the good Lord for that.

You guys gave us Obama.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 2:43PM EDT (link)

How do you like the socialism and gang of thugs that came with him? You could have had a leader who gave you strict constructionists on the Supreme Court instead of two more liberals. But you wanted somebody purer–so you nominated Dole redux, a sure loser. So much for your purity and high-mindedness. Time for a little political realism around here. Rudy’s a blue stater. He would have won a lot of blue and purple states. He would have nominated two more like Scalia. But he just wasn’t pure enough.

You can't be serious

Jack_Savage (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 2:50PM EDT (link)

You believe that John McCain was a pure conservative, pushed into the nomination by the religious right, and that is why Obama got elected?

Seriously?

Read what I said.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 3:40PM EDT (link)

Rudy got shot down by Dr. Dobson’s crowd. That gave McCain the opening he needed to get the nod–skipping Iowa, winning the SC pro-military vote and cleaning up in NH where he always did well. Rudy couldn’t in a million years compete in the early primary states that were loaded with farmers and evangelicals, especially in a winner-take-all system. That left only FL–where Crist double-crossed him by backing a fellow moderate–McCain. So the system stuck us with a moderate-loser–and gave us Obama.

I’m from PA. I would have liked a system that gave my opinion the same weight as some farmer in IA or some evangelical in SC. Instead it was all over by the time PA had its primary. It was a really dumb system. Instead of proving their strength in states that really mattered–battleground states like PA and OH–or in blue states like NJ and CT–the system tested them in small atypical states that never matter much in a general election. The question we should have been asking is not how well can somebody like Huckabee do in IA, but how well can he do in PA. Ditto for Rudy.

This is one of the problems I’m having with Pence. He’s not a big deal for a lot of Republicans like me. Yet a conservative website like this will push him for ideological reasons outside the bounds of political realism, showing little concern for what blue or purple staters think. Yet if Rick Santorum got shot down here in PA, if Toomey just squeaked by here, how well do you suppose Pence would do as a candidate, given his weak resume and unknown persona? Not well at all, I suspect. It doesn’t matter how well he can do in Iowa if this is the case.

It appears that you are having some senior moments

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 4:58PM EDT (link)

because you just can’t get beyond Rudy in the 08 election. One of the things you keep going after Pence for his his dourness, yet you have yet to post anything that isn’t dour. Good Lord we are in 2010 not 2008, get over it already. We ain’t getting a do-over, and, even if we did, Rudy would still be on the bottom, where he wound up in in 2008.

It appears to me...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:24PM EDT (link)

using insults instead of a reasoned argument is tantamount to admitting you’ve got none. If I sound as if I’m stuck on Rudy, it’s because we need to learn from our past mistakes, not make the same stupid ones over and over–and maybe remedy them in the process. Pence is a stupid mistake. But guys like you would never acknowledge this. It’s enough for you that he’s strongly pro-life, etc. To that I say, so what? Can he bring NJ to the table the way Rudy can–to win the next election? If not, why give him a shot? He’s just another talking head with no accomplishments behind him and no charisma to speak of.

I'm declaring Hinz rule on writeblock

pilgrim (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:41PM EDT (link)

He writes
Pence is a stupid mistake. He offers no argument, Do Not Feed The Troll.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

My conservative credentials are solid.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:51PM EDT (link)

On the other hand, you use insults instead of arguments and mischaracterize what I say to pile on. How is that helpful in a political discussion–or even reasonable. Why nitpick at what I say and pretend I meant more than I did? I didn’t say Pence was stupid. I didn’t accuse anyone here of being stupid. I said the mistake was stupid

How do we know

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:57PM EDT (link)

your conservative credentials are solid.
It’s the net.
You can say anything you want.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

Name one thing...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 8:55PM EDT (link)

I’ve said to indicate I’m not a solid conservative. I’ve already stated I agree with Pence on the issues. I’ve offered conservative opinions on this site intermittently for several years now. That should be proof enough. This is the first time I’ve encountered any flak–mainly because I’m not impressed by Pence. I would vote for him if he were the nominee–but I’d be worried sick.

I wont name anything.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:09PM EDT (link)

Just saying just because you claim to be conservative
doesn’t nessecarily make you one.
Net thingy and all.
And to my experience, most conservatives don’t have to claim to be one.
They just are.
They don’t have to tell anyone. ;)

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

If I claim to be conservative...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 9:22PM EDT (link)

It’s because obviously I’m opposing the herd mentality around here and knew sooner or later someone would claim I’m a troll–which someone did. It happens I’m not. Just a guy with a different opinion who wants more from a candidate besides the correct views on a subject. I want proof that candidate has achieved something and is psychologically equipped to lead this nation. A few years in the House doesn’t much impress me, no matter how right Pence is on the issues.

See Now You

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:49PM EDT (link)

Didn’t do yourself any favors by lying about being a conservative. I also don’t believe you are a liberal troll either.

So, I’ll cut you some slack with some advice.

1) Cool off for a little bit your digging yourself into ugly spot you don’t want to be. 2) Stop being so rigid on the candidates when you just got here, and most folks are all agreeing on here that they are open minded, and you come on here as close minded and focused on 1 candidate.
3) Relax and be more cordial with folks on here. You have a long time to be the person that represents and cares about leadership and achievement(not bad things), you don’t need come in here and ram that message and your one candidate(who in all intensive purposes isn’t even running) down everybody’s throats upon arrival.

I hope that you find that I’m giving this advice in good faith.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Dudes been here 2y 1m.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:56PM EDT (link)

He should know the ropes by now.
I hope he doesn’t hang himself with em.
And I am being sincere.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

T' Ha Ha Ha

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:59PM EDT (link)

Are you serial? Wow.

No offense to writeblock.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Since Al Gore made it popular.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:07PM EDT (link)

Yes, I am serial.
LOL :)

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 
 

None of you piling on...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 11:30PM EDT (link)

seem to get it. If you don’t tolerate any dissent from your views, how do you expect to win elections? There are 350 million Americans in this country, all of them with different perspectives. Some of us are more conservative on one issue than on another–while still preserving our conservative identities. It’s ridiculous to behave as some of you are behaving. I’ve seen you pull this before with others–good Republicans and seemingly good conservatives–and you piled on with them as well. Let me turn this around and give some of you some advice: a good way to initiate a Third Party would be to demand that everybody think in lockstep with your own closed-minded opinions. I’m pro-life, pro-gun, anti-gay agenda. I fought like hell against the Health bill and took to the streets with the Tea Party. But if your intention was to alienate the likes of me, you’ve succeeded.

 
 
 
 
 

The "McCain" bit did it for me, writeblock.

acat (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:21PM EDT (link)

The only “purity” in John McCain that I can find is he’s very pro-McCain… Other than that, he’s all over the map.

Saying he’s a “pure conservative” is … well, it makes me wonder about your cred.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

That Is How I Describe Him, Too

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:45PM EDT (link)

That is why I found his “Country, First” campaign as so interesting. It was almost if he was compensating for a political career of “McCain, First”. That guy is seriously the most self centered politician I think I have ever seen. And that is saying a lot.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

McCain was pro-life and pro-military...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 11:41PM EDT (link)

that made him purer than Romney who was not considered a bona fide Christian and was suspect for his switch on abortion–and of course Rudy. Huckabee and Thompson cancelled each other out. It was in that sense that McCain emerged as the purest of them all. But Rudy was our best shot.

I did ask you a question, care to respond.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 11:48PM EDT (link)

Or will you play artfull dodger.
Look on the comment list.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Besides...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:44PM EDT (link)

I’m using Rudy primarily as an example of all that Pence lacks.

You Know Writeblock

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 8:17PM EDT (link)

you go to war with the army you have.

I’m going to keep on writing to you as a pragmatist because clearly that is where you get your political identity.

P.S. nothing wrong with pragmatism assuming that isn’t someones only political virtue(you also need to be courageous, principled, etc.)

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Sure I'm a pragmatist.

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 8:59PM EDT (link)

But that doesn’t belie my conservatism. I just like to win elections. Losing has a lot of consequences–especially when it comes to nominating for the courts. That’s what’ll shape our nation’s cultural future–not being pure as the driven snow politically. Winning is everything in politics.

Yeah,

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:19PM EDT (link)

So find someone that can win in the primary and the general.

And also move on buddy 08 was 2 years ago.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Or else...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 9:35PM EDT (link)

Set up a primary system that makes sense.

Or one that works for you.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:42PM EDT (link)

Isn’t that what you want.
Set a system up that will get your boy Rudy elected.

Just seen somewhere where someone Hienze ruled you.
In and for respect for Dave, I’m done with you..

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

You seem to be reading wb's comments differently than I am

bk (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 6:23AM EDT (link)

Ignore for a moment the Rudy stuff and look at the broader question. If the primary system is gamed in such a way that we tend to end up with an establishment candidate like a Dole or a McCain then we get hosed in the end.

Which two states have ridiculously huge influence over who gets elected, or at least who gets eliminated? Iowa, which has gone from a farm state to a farm subsidy state, and New Hampshire, whose claim to fame is its “independence” i.e. it’s not quite as liberal as the ultra-liberal states around it. Both went 54-45 for Obama vs 53-46 for the country as a whole. IA is clearly blue, and NH has gone from mostly red after WWII to bluish purple (D in 4 of last 5 presidential elections, though 2010 results were good).

This doesn’t mean that the Republicans in IA and NH are necessarily liberal, but it does mean that we have two small groups of Republicans who filter down the field and can wipe out people who might have done better had they had more of a chance in a broader context.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I read an article by Mike Pence that he wrote

jtlfromfredmd Friday, December 17th at 1:19PM EDT (link)

for “Imprimus” earlier in the year and, I have to be honest with you, I had my eyes opened big time! He may not have the blow to the solar plexus that Sarah Palin has but he’s got everything else. I would even go so far as to say it was a “presidential” article. Filled with history and written in a very eloquent style. I like him and would have no problem whatsoever casting a vote for him should he decide to run. He may be one of the dark horses that has been mentioned many times here at Redstate.

Many times the delivery of the speech

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 5:04PM EDT (link)

is as important as the words. Here is a link to the video of that speech-

http://www.thehotjoints.com/2010/09/27/video-mike-pence-speaks-at-hillsdale-college/

He said the right things...

writeblock Friday, December 17th at 8:33PM EDT (link)

He was erudite and dignified and properly conservative. But O so solemn. That, imo, is the major problem with Pence. He never seems to crack a smile. He carries the world on his shoulders. Think of FDR, Churchill, Reagan–all the great ones. They were happy warriors. They relished the fight. Pence seems miserable underneath.

You do not know who Mike Pence is.

pilgrim (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:32AM EDT (link)

Mike Pence is most definitely a happy warrior. A quote from him

I am a Christian, a conservative and a Republican, in that order. I’m a conservative, but I’m not mad about it.

You should read a column he wrote in 1991 while he was the president of the Indiana Policy Review think tank.

http://mikepence.com/speeches/NegCamp.html

The meme that Mike Pence is a dour miserable angry man is a lie.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

pilgrim- The only person

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:44AM EDT (link)

I’ve heard making the “miserable” accusation is the one you replied to. It surely is an outright lie. It’s fine if you are in someone else’s camp, or just plain don’t like a particular candidate, but, as they say, you are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Perhaps the above commentor is confusing “serious” for miserable. Maybe Al Franken would be a better choice for him/her.

Hey Scope

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 11:11AM EDT (link)

I was really looking forward to you’re input on the debate structure topic since you suggested I write it in a diary.

And to let you know, I have been a huge Pence fan since I first discovered him 8 years ago. He used to be my favorite elected official period. Until I found a few folks like Ryan. And I used to have a big thing for Mark Sanford until he threw it all away. But seriously, I want Pence to have his shot at the big time, he is one of my fav’s in all of the folks listed. I also want Cain to have a shot this year.

I’m sick and tired of this constant joke of the media’s “big 4″. Like somehow you are forced to pick between who the media has anointed as the only ones “that have a shot to win”. I want to give conservative, smart, and creative folks the shot of impressing me and everybody else in the primaries and if you’re a Pence supporter than you should too.

Maybe, there are other avenues to go as well. But you have to admit the current system is way to rigged against folks like him and us.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

wonkish- I suggested

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 11:44AM EDT (link)

that you write a diary about debate structures because this diary is about “An avenue for Mike Pence?” I’ll look at your diary again and see if I have anything to add.

I believe your reference to the “big 4″ means those such as Palin, Huckabee, Romney and Gingrich et al. Right now, no one knows for sure who will get into the 2012 race. Any polling done now mostly includes just those names. So, of course Romney is ahead in this poll, and Palin is ahead in that poll. It’s quite laughable that any polls are even being done at this time with the field not yet being populated. If it is mostly left leaning polling outfits putting out their poll results, it could only be because they are getting out in front on trying to choose our candidate again. They do it every time. There are also right leaning bloggers and pundits that are already coming out in support for “their guy” before they know who all the guys/gals may be. You read it all over the wicked wild web.

In an article I read not long ago, the author suggested that for those who are not that well known, the earlier they get in the race the better the momentum can be for them. They may be able to steal some thunder from the not so serious candidates that are mostly interested in seeing their name displayed on the marqee with lights.

I like Paul Ryan. He is one of the only ones to put plans to paper. I don’t like or agree with all of his Roadmap, but I give him much credit for at least attempting to do something. What I don’t care for is his apparent close connections to the Young Guns, and those that started it and run it. I see that as the junior version of the NRSC. They need to stay out of the primaries unless there is no candidate running in a particular district, or with a candidate similar to Alvin Green. OTOH, Mike Pence has remained apart from the Young Guns, and for that I am forever grateful.

Okay

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 11:59AM EDT (link)

The “big ~4″ wasn’t really a reference to this GOP primary. It was a reference to the primaries every single cycle. The media always anoints a “top tier” and “second tier” list of candidates very early into the primary season. And a lot of primary voters feel that they have to start by only choosing amongst the “top tier”. Now if we can make the “top tier” and “second tier” more fluid in general then that should alleviate much of those problems.

Again my belief that attempts at giving other candidates their shot is not a statement about the current big 4. It is just a belief that we are capable of making our own choices and any changes that increase the fluidity of the primary schedule is a positive one because it increases our choice.

In case you are wondering, amongst the current front runners I do absolutely dislike Huck and Romney, and the only real decision I have made about the primaries is not those 2. That said my belief in a more fluid primary doesn’t stem from a dislike of those 2(because I think neither will win anyway), but instead a desire to see a more fluid primary where the best candidate wins instead of the best of a small group of front runners wins.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 
 
 

Hey, wise up...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 3:55PM EDT (link)

Don’t call somebody who disagrees with you a liar. How is expressing an opinion a lie? Grow up. People differ. Not every conservative is interested in Pence. That’s just the way it is.

 
 

Pence is really the epitome of the Happy Warrior, even more

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 11:05AM EDT (link)

than Mike Gallagher!

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com and Charlotte Observer columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 

I don't want to read anything by him...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 2:33PM EDT (link)

Because what he writes is not the issue. Neither is what he believes. That’s not relevant–any more than nominating any one of us who believe as he does would be.

I believe as he does–why not nominate me since I’m just as conservative? But I’ve achieved zilch politically–and have no executive experience and nobody knows who I am. Sounds pretty much like Pence.

How he presents himself, together with his political history, is what counts–and his presence is downbeat and pessimistic. I personally don’t care how Christian he is either. We’re in a civil war and we need warriors to lead us–not another Christian gentleman who will turn the other cheek. The real questions we ought to be asking, he can’t answer: Can he rally a nation? Can he forge a bond with the general public? Has he the executive skills to push a conservative agenda–not just with true believers? I don’t think so.

Ok fine.Don't read him and don't tell us who he is.

pilgrim (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 2:43PM EDT (link)

You have zero, zilch, nada factual information about Mike Pence. It’s your right to form your own opinions about candidates. For you to make comments about someone you will not read and no knowledge about is just a waste of your time.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

This comment makes no sense...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 3:51PM EDT (link)

Since my whole point is not ideological but based on how he presents himself and his own history outside of what he says and writes. As for facts–it IS a fact that he lacks executive experience. What’s unfactual about that?

As for the rest, I have no quarrel with his conservatism. I share his Christian and fiscal beliefs so I don’t have to read what he writes. I accept that he reflects everything I want in a candidate ideologically. But it’s his gloomy-gus demeanor and lack of experience I am questioning, not his beliefs. I object to his over-reaching for the presidency when he has so little experience to back up such a huge ambition. I don’t want to put this nation’s future in the hands of a relative lightweight. Sure I might be wrong. He might indeed be another Lincoln. But the odds are he isn’t.

 
 

writeblock- I know you won't click on this link

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 4:45PM EDT (link)

because you already said you refuse to read anything about Pence, but, to prove you wrong that he is just another nice Christian man, willing to turn the other cheek, it is for the benefit of others that read here to dispute your false allegations-

http://mikepence.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=48&Itemid=94

Please page down to see the many many times Pence has spoken out against not only this regime, but he also spoke out against some former Bush policies as well.

You can tag him in any way you choose, but, your miserable, downer, pessimistic charges have no basis in facts. Please for all of us, what has he said, with links to prove it, that he is a downer. It’s easy to make all kinds of accusations, because that is what you personally believe, but, never back it up with the first proven example. I’m sure you never read his speech at Hillsdale College, that was very uplifting, and positive, and a resounding success at one of the only conservative colleges in these United State.

You say that he really doesn’t believe what he is saying, again, prove it. If he hasn’t been called authentic by the many, prove that he isn’t authentic.

You say that you object to him running for the presidency, because of your own personal intrepretations about him, which jive with no one else’s. You are the only person I have ever heard calling Pence a downer. Your comments show a great amount of fear/anger of him becoming a top tier candidate, yet you have not posted the first reason to convince anyone of where you are coming from. You shout, he can’t win, then come back and say well he might, but I doubt it. Huhh. No beef, no bite to your arguments, just, he’s a loser.

Your comments above reflect a still sour and bruised soul because your first choice in 08 lost. You say he wasn’t treated fairly. You are still stuck on 2008 and your boy Rudy. As far as I know he isn’t running again, and, I thank God for that. You scream of Pence being sour and dour, but, maybe that is more a reflection of you and your attitude, and, you are projecting that onto Mike Pence. Sure looks that way to me.

Look at his demeanor at Hillsdale...

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 7:57PM EDT (link)

He looks glum, miserable, nervous, unhappy. This is not a great leader of men. This seems like a guy out of his depth. I may be all wrong about this–as wrong as some of you were about Rudy. But that’s how I sense who he is. I’m just as interested in how he presents himself as I am in what he says. And he presents himself poorly.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Its funny how the best

Goldwater_Conservative (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:25PM EDT (link)

candidates in the since of who I think would do the job the best are both in the house…Pence and Ryan. But they both have such a huge hill to climb.

How are they the best?

writeblock Saturday, December 18th at 4:03PM EDT (link)

It’s not enough to be smart or correct on the issues. Leadership demands more, much more.

I know that

Goldwater_Conservative (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 7:49PM EDT (link)

but to a degree you have to project what they will be like as a President. That goes for all the govenors as well, you really just dont know what they will be like until they get in there. But you want to start with smart, articulate, good demenor and quick on their feet, thats a good starting point. I actually think both Pence and Ryan can get the three legs needed (fi-cons, so-cons, and indys) to be president easier than can the supposed frontrunners at this point.

 
 
 

Iowa or New Hampshire: do well in one or go home

red_oakster (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:31PM EDT (link)

Pence is fascinating because he could do well in both.

Assuming Huckabee and Palin both run in Iowa, Pence is about the only dark horse I can see throwing up a surprise. If he did pull an upset by finishing second or better, he would become the potential anti-Romney candidate in New Hampshire. Huckabee and Palin both want to show the establishment what’s what, and anyone who thinks either of that pair isn’t running is kidding himself.

I think if Pence does not run, New Hampshire is going to be the place where the next nominee is spotted. Huckabee and Palin both will be challenged to win in places like Pennsylvania and California and New York. They could do it, but an establishment candidate is going to be better positioned to win delegates in blue and purple states.That favors Romney or an anti-Romney who can wipe out Mitt in New Hampshire using the healthcare and flip-flop issues. Though I don’t like him because of his weak foreign policy and social policy positions, Daniels might do that. But so might John Bolton or even Rudy Giuliani (who has been making noises recently).

In any event, we’ll see how astute Pence is. 2012 is his best chance, notwithstanding all the blather about someone from the House being unable to win. He can win, he’s positioned himself adroitly to appeal to the Tea Party, and he matches up well against the leading contenders. With frankly smarter politicians like Rubio and Jindal and Paul Ryan gaining prominence in the years ahead, Pence’s window of opportunity will close fast. Moreover a stint as governor will gets his hands dirty in a manner bound to disappoint the ideological purists.

If Pence wants to be President, this is the time.

Changes In

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:37PM EDT (link)

Primary structure could change that a bit. Maybe we’ll see.

Otherwise, I think its possible that laying down a stake in South Carolina(assuming you do decent in the first 2 states) is a possible strategy that could work. It is risky, but doable. Guiliani pinned his hopes on what 6 states down in Florida? That is just to far.

I think with the rule changes you assuming you got at least 15% in Iowa and New Hampshire, you still could probably win in South Carolina and then be a contender. Beyond that, then no you need to take one of the early ones. Any attempts later than that are fruitless.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 

Well put

haumea (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:56PM EDT (link)

There’s a need to think out of the box for 2012. Using the “no House members need apply rule” is unnecessarily limiting.

Pence is not exciting to some? Well, that eliminates just about every other governor or former governor we have. He’s more exciting than Pawlenty or Romney. (And Huckabee is obviously unacceptable.)

I like Erick’s analysis here as I’ve been thinking along the same lines: Pence is best fit because a) he appeals to the base and b) he doesn’t repel establishment types that could fatally wound a nominee they reject.

He deserves a long, hard, serious look by everyone currently skeptical of his chances.

 

There is one way for Pence to win

rdelbov Friday, December 17th at 1:58PM EDT (link)

and that is to either connect with grassroot folks in Iowa or NH

I think Iowa is the place

 

Agree

jtlfromfredmd Friday, December 17th at 2:02PM EDT (link)

But, one has to admit that these are definitely not “normal” times. Just look at the recent election. We are swimming in uncharted waters and I think that some of the established “election” rules may not apply now. The Tea Party (thank goodness) will see to that.

Not .. entirely uncharted...

acat (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:45PM EDT (link)

There have been periods in the past where the balance swung sharply back and forth between the two parties .. although it’s been a while. The issues aren’t the same, naturally, but there are parallels.

And yes, this is “interesting times”. Things are not normal. One thing the Tea Parties (and, to an extent, the success of “Hope & Change”) indicate is that the people are not willing to go along with the party leadership … we do not as a nation trust the politicians to know what’s best.

Whichever party recognizes this first will dominate for at least 10 years….

I have to agree that Pence is very well positioned, having served in the House for a decade, and had a successful career as a radio talk show host previously. (described, at the time, as “Rush on decaf” …) He communicates well, doesn’t ruffle establishment feathers, and appears to have good Tea Party cred.

He needs to elevate his stature a bit, but .. yeah. He could win it.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 

They are a lot of undecideds here

charliebravoNH (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 9:20PM EDT (link)

despite good numbers for Romney. I would tell you this,a candidate who talks endlessly on how bad Romneycare here will go nowhere. Most people around here are familiar with the Mass Health Exchange. I personally know people who have bought insurance off it, payed the fines for not buying insurance and beat the system with waivers. Half this state is the northern suburbs of Boston and the most Republican leaning areas in NH are near the MA border.

Winning NH means meeting voters in small settings and engaging in what is known as retail politics. You are right Pence could do well here, he is a solid conservative and he comes across as very likable.

Support the PC Strategy Alliance
http://concordproject.org/ http://party.procinct.net/
http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com/

ChBRVNH

 
 

Palin, by all rights, should connect with the establishment.

bjwilson83 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 1:36PM EDT (link)

She’s been a mayor, governor, oil and gas comission appointee, VP candidate, etc. She made clear that she was a Republican first when the Tea Party was thinking about going third party, and endorsed establishment people such as McCain, Fiorina, and almost Norton. Unfortunately, her portrayal in the media (and, to be honest, her efforts to play to the populist side) have undermined that somewhat. And I think that the conservative grassroots will be much more powerful than the RINO establishment in 2012, due to reaction to Obama. Much like reaction to Carter gave us Reagan (who, last time I checked, was not liked very much at all by the establishment – didn’t he run against Bush?) I guess it all depends on the balance between establishment and grassroots; Pence just doesn’t excite me all that much.

Does not compute ...

acat (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:33PM EDT (link)

Seems to me that most of the “establishment” can also be described as an “old boy network” ..

And who was it that went after the Alaskan GOP good old boy network like a mama grizzly after a salmon?

Palin.

One of the other interesting lessons to take from the Art Chance school of Alaska politics .. the Alaska establishment hates her … and the network is nationwide….

She’ll never connect with the establishment – not without changing it. Anyone currently in the establishment will always be wondering when she’ll turn on them.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 

I think Palin would decline a run

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:47PM EDT (link)

and back Pence if he gets in. She said that if there was a good conservative candidate in the race, she would not run. Pence is strong on social issues, without being loud or obnoxious about it, he would not try to come off as Pastor Huckabee. He is strong on national defense, and is currently fighting against Don’t ask, and START, and he deeply loves honors our military members. He has been very consistent with not backing big government spending and did not vote for TARP, No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D or any big government programs. He has never gotten hoodwinked by the elitists that lost us our majorities in 06 and 08. He is definitely for smaller federal government.

From what I gather, Palin is also supportive of the positions I listed above. I don’t see her not backing Pence. I really do believe that Palin does want the best for the country, and, she would know that endorsing Pence would shoot him to the top tier.

Pence has been our DeMint in the House!

gracie (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 3:17PM EDT (link)

Agree with everything you said.

Pence/Jindal for 2012!!!

Thumbs Up graciegirl

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 5:12PM EDT (link)

I’ll take Pence/Jindal. One thing I trust about Pence is that he would choose his running mate wisely, knowing that after his 8 years, his VP could carry the next 8.

Pence/Rubio

mboyle1988 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:01PM EDT (link)

We need the Latino vote, and Rubio is a surefire win in 2020.

No we don't as much as you think

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 3:09PM EDT (link)

No we don’t need the latino vote as much as you think. Yes, it is good to have but not at the expense of watering down common-sense constitutional conservatism which is good for ALL Americans.

Secure the border first. By a year after that, we can then look at the illegal problem further.

 
 
 
 

Pence should run for govenor right now.

bjwilson83 (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 5:28PM EDT (link)

I have little faith in people who have not won statewide to win nationally. You may have the right principles, but if you haven’t run that large of a campaign before you’re bound to get tripped up on the national stage.

I disagree

Scope (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 6:16PM EDT (link)

It’s back to the electability thing again, and, it presumes that anyone who hasn’t run a big campaign will get tripped up, not even knowing if that’s the case with every candidate that may run. Some are much more disciplined than others. Most importantly, if someone stays true to who they are, and they believe what they do to their very heart and soul, it would be very difficult to trip them up. I have no use for someone who claims to be a conservative, and repeats it over and over, but has no record to back it up. I am not in favor of anyone who has no record to peruse. I am not in favor of any of the retreads who have been vetted before the public, and obviously have been rejected.

The way I see it is the 2012 Presidential election will be the most important election in my lifetime. The job that Obama would be vacating will be the toughest of any incoming Republican president in history. The O, and his infiltrators have closed their tentacles around the neck of every institution in this country. That is, only the tentacles that have been visible. There are many that will come up to bite us in the future. Some of the names out there of possibilities are being thrown under the bus because some see some of those people as “not ready yet.” I detest people suggesting that this or that candidate needs more time with training wheels. Let the voters decide who is not ready for prime time.

Those are two different questions.

bjwilson83 (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 10:31AM EDT (link)

Being “ready for prime time” is not the same thing as being able to run an effective campaign from a strategic viewpoint. I don’t worry about the first. I do worry about the second, having seen it cost us close races.

 
 

Definitely agree with this

Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 9:17AM EDT (link)

I would prefer Pence to run for governor this go around.

Of course, I’m a Daniels guy.

********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts

 

Definitely agree with this

Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 9:17AM EDT (link)

I would prefer Pence to run for governor this go around.

Of course, I’m a Daniels guy.

********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts

 
 
 
 

I Really Like Pence

victrola Friday, December 17th at 1:39PM EDT (link)

I think he has a difficult road in a crowded field, but I look at Pence as having all the benefits of a Palin without the personality issues that could cloud a battle of ideas and ideology. I would say Pence has an even “more conservative” record than Palin (like opposing TARP) My issue with Palin is not that she’s “too conservative” it’s that I see it becoming an election about personalities.

Had Pence been smart, he would have stepped up to Evan Bayh and challenged him before Coates did. “Senator Pence” would have been a much better spot to have launched a Presidential campaign.

Brrrrr- Senators make bad Presidents

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:51PM EDT (link)

look at the one we have now, or the one we could have had. Senators are the ultimate in arrogance.

I Don't Read Too Much Into That

victrola Friday, December 17th at 3:36PM EDT (link)

There have been bad Governors as President (Carter) and great Governors as President (Reagan). Also Generals like Grant that were horrible, and successful ones like Eisenhower.

The sample size is so small because there have been so few Presidents that it’s hard to really draw any valid conclusions. I wouldn’t dismiss a good conservative because they had the title “Senator”.

The issue with House members running for President is they haven’t really proven their viability to voters (the overwhelming amount of House districts are gerry-mandered to the point they aren’t competitive, like Pence’s) whereas statewide races are usually a greater challenge and they have to appeal to independents and moderates. Even complete cranks can have get handily reelected every House election. (like Kucinich)

Being a Senator would have put Pence much higher on the food chain.

 

Just a detail .. Pence isn't in the Senate. He's in the House. [nt]

acat (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 3:54PM EDT (link)

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

I know, I said he SHOULD have run for Senate (nt)

victrola Friday, December 17th at 4:13PM EDT (link)

No, Stutzman was the right candidate...

acat (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:18AM EDT (link)

Pence was right where he needed to be.. had he been off running for Senate, we would have lost a strong Conservative voice in the House just when we needed it most.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 
 

Wouldn't mind Pence one bit.

indy82 Friday, December 17th at 2:09PM EDT (link)

I would love to see somebody like Pence. As a center right Independent voter, what strikes me about Pence is that he is principled, but not polarizing (i.e. Palin). There is just something very authentic to the man and something very “common sense” to his political positions of smaller government.

55555

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:53PM EDT (link)

Principled and authentic are critical and Pence is both.

55555 agree Scope to all..-nt-

ladyimpactohio (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:32PM EDT (link)

We the people tell government what to do, it does not tell us.–Ronald Reagan in his farewell speech

 
 

Principled, but not polarizing

Sam Gamgee Saturday, December 18th at 10:19AM EDT (link)

This is exactly the best way to describe what we should be looking for — someone who is a principled conservative, but not a polarizing figure. Well said!

“I wonder what sort of tale we’ve fallen into.”

After more than a year of Glenn Beck

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:28AM EDT (link)

preachin’ it to look for principles, honor and integrity in our politicians, I could see Beck easily getting behind Pence, and he does have a huge audience.

 
 
 

Another Important Point

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:22PM EDT (link)

If you want to non traditional candidates to stand a much better chance at succeeding in the primaries we need to support a change in debate structures.

It is absolutely sick that we allow the media to have so much influence on our primaries with questions like “Give me your 30 second answer to the economy” and “Raise your hand if you believe that global warming is an important issue and that it is man made.” That is an absolute joke designed to lower the value of the candidates themselves in the primary process and elevate the media personalities that act as the moderators. This isn’t American Idol here.

So us in the grassroots need to demand more power for the candidates and the party in setting debate structure and less power of the media in deciding debate structure because average GOP voters will better be able to decide who they want when they actually get to hear more from the candidates ideas and style instead of constantly being forced into talking in platitudes due to basic repetitive questions and a limited amount of time to answer.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Debate Format

edintexas Friday, December 17th at 3:20PM EDT (link)

I seem to recollect that the debate format and rules are negotiated between the two (or more) camps, not imposed by the MSM. Obviously the Democrat will try to insist on as much MSM control as possible – it is in any Democrat’s best interest to have his cheerleaders running the show. The Republican has to have the brass to stand up to this sort of game play. I know, its asking a lot.

Your Confusing General Election and Primary

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 3:35PM EDT (link)

In the general election the debate format is negotiated between the two camps with the debate commission being the arbiter. All in all, historically in the general the campaign staffs have always sought control and to limit there risk in a debate so the debates have always grown more and more controlled.

In the primaries the debates are always completely set up by the media and the candidates choose whether they want to participate or not. But with our unique presence as the people that every GOP candidate in the primary wants to court, if we demand more open debates then the GOP candidates will exercise there influence on the structure.

I think we will be seeing a lot better debates this year, but I think we should keep the pressure on the candidates to put pressure on the networks to get open debates. I bet only 30 headline posts on Redstate between now and next summer and you probably would fix this problem just off of that.

Basically, it wouldn’t take that much effort to fix debate structure.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

I didn't know that any

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 5:34PM EDT (link)

Debate Commission existed. Thanks for that info. From what I found, they started in 1987, in a much much different media market. No question that the MSM has taken a far left turn, almost every one of them. FOX is cable, and not available to everyone.

I’ve been reading some protests about the Republican primary debates to be taken away from the leftists. I think it is going to be critical for the new RNC chair to make a big issue of this. Isn’t the first Republican primary debate, in May, to be hosted by FOX? Just don’t allow Juan Williams, Mara Liason, or Kirsten Powers any where near the moderation. That would be about as good as Gwen Ifil moderating.

First is Supposedly Early Spring

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 5:45PM EDT (link)

But lets see if anybody is really ready by that time. The date of that one came with a lot of laughter from many as they expect only a few people at most to show up for it if any. I think it was NBC Politico also, but the Politico part is also got some folks(including myself) bothered that we would let the Politico be the co sponsor of our first.

The goal is actually to reduce the power of the moderators by allowing GOP candidates to instead ask each other questions and just talk with each other.

We also may need to look at rotating smaller groups up there instead of the 8, 10, 15 sharing 2 hours we are used to. Debates should be held over a few days with randomly picked groups of 3 or 4 at the most. Increase the speaking time and allow them to ask each other questions.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Bad idea

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 6:08PM EDT (link)

putting up just a few at a time. Who would you pit against who? If there is a large stage, then extend the time of the debate in order to encompass everyone on stage.

Whoever isn’t in it by spring will be making a Fred Thompson mistake.

Who cares what Politico says, they are more lefty than anything. Poop on Politico.

As to how many will populate the Republican stage, it is about as up in the air as the stars.

You Could Do That Too

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 6:30PM EDT (link)

You could either extend the time to 4 hours(which I don’t think you will find many networks willing to do) or you break them up in groups. And the only fair way is likely to truly *randomly* pick the groups. Over time given enough debates everybody would share the stage with everybody.

I said that we should “look at” because the real answer is I don’t know, but ultimately on a scale of a 1 being debates of essentially 30 second commercials on stage and a 10 being Lincoln Douglas debates with no moderator we are currently at about a 1.5. The only way we truly get to pick our candidates without much influence from the media is if we move our debates a little farther down that scale. And with that I am definitely open to any ideas folks have. Currently, here are some.

—-Allow candidates to ask each other questions(I think that is given)
—-Increase the answer time of specific questions
—-Have more focused debates that deal with more specific issues
—-Extend the overall time of Debates
—-Break the candidates into *random* groups and spread a debate over several days
—-Move towards a balance of time structure for keeping track of time instead of the standard “lets cut them off at x” which is kind of degrading to do to a presidential candidate by a media person
—-Allow notes into debates. Instead of having lets memorize 8 statistics that we will use over and over again during the debate, allow them to write down a lot of things so more information is shared
—-Allow the use of props if candidates want to. They may actually end up bringing out some graph or something that convinces a few soft Dems to vote GOP

A couple of these ideas may not be good to implement, but one thing is for sure we need to move away from our current debate structure. The current process is way, way to media influenced and I don’t care who’s carrying out the debate a move towards more candidate freedom and less media control.

I am curious to hear others ideas though, too.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

wonkish1- I think you have some interesting ideas

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 6:58PM EDT (link)

that you may want to expand into a diary. This diary is about a particular candidate, and to veer into how debates are conducted is more or less a threadjack. I should have thought of that before I responded to your debate ideas. Do a diary on your debate ideas.

Sure Thing and I Will

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:02PM EDT (link)

And sorry it wasn’t meant to be a threadjack. It was more an attempt to say that in order for someone like Pence to more easily overcome clear disadvantages in name id we need to restructure the debates.

It was in the name of giving Pence his shot that I mentioned this topic. Basically it will remain unlikely that any lesser known individual will rise in the current primaries unless we reform debate structure.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

wonkish1- You are putting all the weight

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:29PM EDT (link)

on the debates. Sure, they are important, but they are not the entire deciding factor. The momentum is going to happen far away from the debates.

Nah,

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:53PM EDT (link)

Its the only thing I know of that currently is very egregiously rigged by the media and something that we actually have a lot of power in being able to fix.

But I am definitely open to hearing other things we need to fix in the primary structure. Obviously dealing with the fact that the early primary states is screwing, but that also is a different stage. I’m talking about allowing the best candidates float to the top, the primary states deals with making sure the best candidate at the top tier actually end up winning.

I’ll have the diary up in a little bit.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Its Up

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:35PM EDT (link)

http://www.redstate.com/wonkish1/2010/12/17/debate-structure-one-key-element-to-allowing-us-not-the-media-pick-our-candidates/

Folks that are interested in the topic of debate structure and how it pertains to allowing folks like Pence and Cain with little name id to be able to make their case to the GOP primary voter can check out the diary.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 
 
 
 
 
 

The current predictions

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 6:34PM EDT (link)

Is that most folks are entering in late spring early summer. I think they got until early August to hop in, if you wait until late August your likely not going to get the organization up to pull it off.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

That's another diary wonkish1

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:00PM EDT (link)

and one you should write as to your ideas.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The "First Primary" is more important than debates...

Greg Garrison (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 6:27PM EDT (link)

…and that’s the money primary. Like it or not, that’s how politics works. We can admire Pence or whoever else, but if that admiration doesn’t translate into donation and mobilization, it’s not going to get the desired candidate anywhere. In 2000, Bush locked up the money primary sizably and early on, and that created enough confidence in him to give him a huge advantage over the rest of the field.

http://www.thejoyofreason.com

“The art of compromise, which is central to a successful democracy, is not something that people learn overnight.” – Donald Rumsfeld

08 Doesn't Appear to Agree With You

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 6:38PM EDT (link)

McCain while starting off as a way early frontrunner was near broke with almost no campaign staff when he hobbled to his victory in New Hampshire. Huckabee didn’t have much at all when he took 2nd in Ames, and Giuliani and Romney the 2 with the early money and volunteers largely collapsed.

Also back in the day Forbes definitely had a pretty good amount of money, and then couldn’t get him a nomination.

The early debates usually are the only pathway for people in tier 2 to get the money and staff to make a serious run at it, so they definitely matter.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 

I disagree Greg G

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:04PM EDT (link)

Huckabee won the first primary in 2008. It brought him some much needed funds, but it didn’t last long. By the results of the second primary, Huckabee was already almost out of cash. By the third and further primaries, he was back to sleeping in a hotel that didn’t provide newspapers. The rest of his campaign followed suit.

The Money Primary is very important (reply to Scope and Wonkish1)

Greg Garrison (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:31PM EDT (link)

Scope, I was referring to the money primary (which is why I put First Primary in quotation marks). It happens largely before the first actual primary, which is why many people call it the first primary. Others call it the invisible primary.

Here’s the record since 1980:

Reagan (1984), Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton, Dole (1996), George W. Bush, Gore, and Obama all won the money primary and went on to be the nominee.

George H.W. Bush essentially tied with Pat Buchanan in the money primary.

John Connally (Nixon’s treasury secretary, who ran in 1980), Howard Dean, and Mitt Romney won the money primary but failed to win the nomination; in all three cases (especially Connally and Dean), they fizzled out pretty quickly as the party coalesced behind a more mature, politically viable candidate.

I don’t have any info before 1980, but clearly, no one has lost the money primary and gone on to win the general.

The money primary serves an important purpose. It signals to potential donors and volunteers that a candidate is viable. (The same holds true at a local level, at least in cities and large municipalities, which is why a possible candidate needs to build a sizable network before running.) A successful money campaign is like a positive feedback loop. It builds confidence and pays for more GOTV to win more primaries (and eventually the general election), which leads to greater confidence and donations, etc.

I’m not saying any of this to argue against Pence or anyone else, but the presidential election is not a debating society, and without a big money, a candidate is toast.

It’s not all about ideas, and I’m not sure that it should be, because in an election, activism, money, GOTV, etc weigh more than votes; they’re what lead to votes. This response is growing way longer than I’d originally intended. Perhaps I’ll expand it and turn it into a diary entry, if I can make the time this weekend.

http://www.thejoyofreason.com

“The art of compromise, which is central to a successful democracy, is not something that people learn overnight.” – Donald Rumsfeld

Oops: obvious exception

Greg Garrison (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:36PM EDT (link)

Reagan lost the money primary in 1980 but won the general, largely because he’d spent such a long time nurturing the grass roots. Connaly’s money primary win was an outlier for various reasons.

Sorry about that.

http://www.thejoyofreason.com

“The art of compromise, which is central to a successful democracy, is not something that people learn overnight.” – Donald Rumsfeld

Okay

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 9:04PM EDT (link)

First, of all what you are referring to usually isn’t called the money primary. Its called the staff primary. There is a lot of folks out there that believe that scoring the best staff at the beginning of the primary season is the best way to set yourself up for a victory. And the person that one that in 08 wasn’t Romney it was Giuliani. In 2000, the staff primary was mostly won by Forbes because Bush brought a lot of staff from Texas, but it is largely debatable because most of the good staff was pretty evenly distributed between the big 3.

I think you are confusing the “money primary” with the “staff primary” because in these days a big factor for getting a decent amount of money is scoring the best *bundlers* at the beginning of the election cycle. Bundler: Someone that collects numerous checks from a lot of people usually hold ties in a profession, industry, or company. This money usually still comes in overtime and isn’t received all up front.

The “money primary” isn’t one its multiple “primaries”. It is spread out over the summer, fall and early winter. Most of the substantive money that comes in is during the debates because traditionally any person that gets people’s attention in the middle of the debates will get an influx of donations over the next several days.

Besides the debates there are really only 2 other ways underdogs rise in the primary season. A) they grind it out starting off with meetings of only a dozen people and hopefully impressing them enough to expand that number each meeting they do. B) they attempt to create a positive controversy outside of the debates by saying or doing something many don’t do, but since most people agree, their support increases.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

No, I'm talking about the money primary.

Greg Garrison (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 9:39PM EDT (link)

Karl Rove talks about it in Courage & Consequence (recommended read); that’s where I got the term, though it’s all over the Internet too (legit websites). Just google it in quotation marks.

Yes, it is spread out over the season, but in the list of names cited above, I’m talking about monies collected before Iowa and New Hampshire.

Again, I’m not arguing against Pence or anyone else. But I can’t think of any underdog who has gone on to win the general (in the last 30 years, at least). If Pence (or anyone else who isn’t a frontrunner) wants to win, then s/he needs to build a donor infrastructure and overcome underdog status now so that, between an announcement of candidacy and IA/NH, the nascent campaign can be cash-rich.

http://www.thejoyofreason.com

“The art of compromise, which is central to a successful democracy, is not something that people learn overnight.” – Donald Rumsfeld

McCain Was A Huge Underdog

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 9:52PM EDT (link)

Up until the New Hampshire primary.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

The Guy Had To Use His

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 9:53PM EDT (link)

Donor list as collateral for a loan because he was literally that broke.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Yeah, and the general election went really well for him. nt

Greg Garrison (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 10:00PM EDT (link)

http://www.thejoyofreason.com

“The art of compromise, which is central to a successful democracy, is not something that people learn overnight.” – Donald Rumsfeld

See Now Your

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 10:22PM EDT (link)

just pulling for straws to win an argument.

The issue is whether or not the “money primary” is the best indicator as to who will win the primary. I will admit that getting money is important, but largely that is an effect of either A) being an early front runner or B) performing well in debates.

Actions and words beget money not so much the other way around. And being the one with the most contributions or being the wealthiest before the primaries is not even close to a perfect indicator as to who will win the primary.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Reread each thing that I wrote, please. No grasping here.

Greg Garrison (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 11:30PM EDT (link)

Being consistent and backing up an argument is not grasping at straws. You used McCain to rebut the following statement: “I can’t think of any underdog who has gone on to win the general“. Your refutation makes no sense.

The last person elected President without winning the money race before Iowa was Reagan in 1980, and he quickly overtook the leader because he had building support since the 1950s.

Money reflects party support, especially early on. It doesn’t make candidates successful initially. It reflects their ability to mobilize without party machinery. This wins support of party machinery. Ideas don’t.

There’s nothing wrong with the money leader winning, because money is how campaigns are paid for, and donating money generally indicates that you want and expect a candidate to win. Exception: Ron Paul fans; their donations indicate that their mom didn’t hide the debit card before they started taking bong hits.

http://www.thejoyofreason.com

“The art of compromise, which is central to a successful democracy, is not something that people learn overnight.” – Donald Rumsfeld

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Here's his X factor

haumea (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:25PM EDT (link)

He communicates conservative values in such a low-key, unassuming tone that it makes the listener feel crazy to disagree. It’s Zen-like and precisely what is needed.

Pence's strength

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 3:01PM EDT (link)

He comes across as calm and confident.

There’s Mike Pence…

LIKE STONE WALL!!!

 
 

My first choice right now

tdawg89 Friday, December 17th at 2:28PM EDT (link)

The more I hear from Mike Pence the more I like him. It is great that even this far out, a congressman can be considered to have a shot. I sure hope he is given a fair shake come election time.

My First Choice Is Either...

IJB Friday, December 17th at 2:47PM EDT (link)

…Pence or Barbour.

But I think, in the end, Pence will run for IN GOV (that’s the ‘percentage’ play), so I expect to be down to just Barbour.

Listen to all of Pence's speeches

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 2:58PM EDT (link)

over the last few months. They are directed more toward the Presidency than to a Governorship. I would think if he were considering the Governorship, he would be choosing state events to speak at rather than national venues.

Any of Pence's old radio shows cached online?

acat (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 3:47PM EDT (link)

I’m on a restricted network at the moment and can’t check but .. you might see if there are any available.

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 

Agree Scope, don't care what anyone else says..

ladyimpactohio (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:35PM EDT (link)

Pence is gearing up for a POTUS run. Not governorship. I love the guy.

We the people tell government what to do, it does not tell us.–Ronald Reagan in his farewell speech

ladyimpactohio- I agree

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:02PM EDT (link)

There are speeches, and there are speeches. If Pence was looking at the Governorship, wouldn’t his speeches be more aimed at the state. Wouldn’t he be more intent on speaking in the state, for the state? His speeches are national rather than more local. I’m keeping my fingers crossed, on one hand, that his campaign will be national rather than local. My excitement for him is as much as my excitement was in support of Fred Thompson, though I have much more faith that if he does get in the race, he will stay with it to the end.

 
 
 
 

Pence slogan

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 3:00PM EDT (link)

GARFIELD DID IT!

PENCE CAN TOO!

 
 

I'm not an expert on Mike Pence

redneck_hippie (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 4:01PM EDT (link)

I like him very much. I believe his pattern has been to take the next step in his career deliberately and purposefully. I would be surprised to see him jump to a presidential run now. This is based on the history of his career path. If Congressman Pence makes the decision to run now, I believe it would be the result of an exhaustive study of the ramifications both pro and con and whether he felt he would make a positive difference in the trajectory of our nation even if he lost.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

I agree with that redneck hippie

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:13PM EDT (link)

If he did nothing else as a presidential candidate, he would move the other candidates closer to conservatism. I would only worry about the candidates that are fake conservatives that would move in that direction because they were forced to.

 
 

Jan Brewer Has My Vote

TrueConservative Friday, December 17th at 6:29PM EDT (link)

I wish people would start talking about her for President. She is the perfect candidate, wildly popular all across the nation, and one of the only ‘conservatives’ that has stood up on illegal immigration. The rest just pay lip service to securing the borders.

And Sherrif Joe would be a a shoe-in if he ran. He’s getting old though

Holy Man- I can only imagine the comments that will come from this post

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 7:07PM EDT (link)

Jan Brewer? Ummm proally not.

 

Oh God, no

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 9:01PM EDT (link)

The only thing she’s done in AZ has been to crawl out from under her desk to sign the bill (which was, in many ways, unnecessary). AZ’s fiscal problems mirror CA’s, and she’s done less than Arnie to resolve them (if you can believe it).

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

*Vomit*

bjwilson83 (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 5:42PM EDT (link)

Other than illegal immigration, she’s horrible. She supported higher taxes and endorsed Norton.

And we certainly can't have that...nt.

NightTwister (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 6:05PM EDT (link)

“Baseball fits America well because it expresses our longing for the rule of law while licensing our resentment of law givers.” ― Major League Commissioner of Baseball A. Bartlett Giamatti

Unless you like higher taxes and lobbyist puppets, then no.

bjwilson83 (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 10:27AM EDT (link)

And Michael Bennet is SO much better...nt.

NightTwister (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 1:42PM EDT (link)

“Baseball fits America well because it expresses our longing for the rule of law while licensing our resentment of law givers.” ― Major League Commissioner of Baseball A. Bartlett Giamatti

Norton would have lost to Bennet by a bigger margin.

bjwilson83 (Diary) Tuesday, December 21st at 10:34AM EDT (link)

She was just a weak candidate all around. And no, I’m not ready to hold my nose and vote for the establishment yet like I did for McCain in 2008.

That's ok.

NightTwister (Diary) Tuesday, December 21st at 6:18PM EDT (link)

It’s apparent there were many that wouldn’t do that for Buck. I suppose we’ll just keep electing Democrats in Colorado.

“Baseball fits America well because it expresses our longing for the rule of law while licensing our resentment of law givers.” ― Major League Commissioner of Baseball A. Bartlett Giamatti

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jan Brewer Has My Vote

TrueConservative Friday, December 17th at 6:29PM EDT (link)

I wish people would start talking about her for President. She is the perfect candidate, wildly popular all across the nation, and one of the only ‘conservatives’ that has stood up on illegal immigration. The rest just pay lip service to securing the borders.

And Sherrif Joe would be a a shoe-in if he ran. He’s getting old though

Jan Brewer

mboyle1988 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:10PM EDT (link)

is stupid. Love the lady, but she’s dumb. Her stupidity isn’t enough to damage the state of Arizona too terribly, and she’s a great placeholder for an intelligent conservative, but POTUS? God no.

She's not stupid

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:59PM EDT (link)

Her problem is that with her age, she gets the mind block effect every now and then. That’s not the same thing as stupid.

I know a Phd who is stupid and his brain is sharp as a tack.

 
 
 

Pence NO vote on the "Obama Tax Cuts"

LittleL1954 Friday, December 17th at 7:59PM EDT (link)

is a huge step in the right direction. He is fully aware that Smokefilled Backrooml DC business as usual deal Mitch made is a disaster for anyone desiring to run for the White House as a Repub.
Just as McAmnesty could not do it, neither can anyone who voted Yes on that Obama Tax Cut deal—the party loyalists will not stand by someone who lies to them–
Remember the ” No Unemployment extension not paid for” or “We will work to stop spending and lower the deficit” or the 35 Repub Senators who “Pledged” to not vote for any bill that had Earmarks/Pork in it. Well a Yes Vote on the Tax Extensions broke every “pledge” thses guys made.

Hope Pence does not get corrupted by these guys, but time will tell!

LittleL- He has already proved

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:18PM EDT (link)

over and over that he stands on conservative principles. He voted against every “compassionate conservative” bill brought up in the Bush years. If he wasn’t corrupted in those years, he won’t be corrupted now. That is exactly why I love the guy.

 
 

Ron Paul and Gary Johnson

cej Friday, December 17th at 8:11PM EDT (link)

are the only small-government candidates who might run. Johnson has the best record of shrinking government of any candidate in the Republican primary, bar none. And, obviously, Ron Paul has been on the correct side of every issue since he entered congress over 20 years ago. There are no greater champions of freedom than these two men. And when I say freedom, I don’t mean “freedom in the areas I find politically acceptable” I mean _freedom_!!!

Many of Erick’s “frontrunners” talk a good game about small government at home, yet turn around and call for big government abroad in our empire. They do nothing about the confiscatory and unchecked Federal Reserve. Let’s stop these threats to liberty! They happen to be really expensive. We can do better by giving that wasted money back to the taxpayer.

cej- You are absolutely hilarious

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:29PM EDT (link)

I’ve read the big dispute between Johnson and Paul. No, Johnson is more Libertarian, no Paul is more Libertarian. It is so funny, it is good entertainment. That is all it is, good entertainment. Neither of the losers will get anywhere. Ron Paul has tagged more pork than any other candidate in the House, all while talking about fiscal responsibility. He had the freaking nerve last night on TV to say he voted against every spending bill, knowing he had those bills larded up with pork, and, knowing those bills would pass anyway. He is so desperately dishonest, everyone knows him to be the clown he is. By his lunacy, he will undermine his son Rand no doubt.

Take some time to learn his position

cej Friday, December 17th at 8:41PM EDT (link)

His position is that if pork is going to be doled out, his constituents deserve their money back. He constantly votes against bills which contain pet projects inserted by his office.

Additionally:
It should be telling that Johnson and Paul speak so highly of one another while the same cannot be said of the way the career politicians and lawyers refer to one another. Neither of the men want the Presidency because of the power, they just want someone with their ideas to get the Presidency.

Another way to think of it is this:

Would Gary Johnson be crying the day Ron Paul is sworn into office? No (well maybe yes – tears of joy).
Would Mitt Romney be crying the day John Thune is sworn into office? You bet.

Its Going to Johnson not Paul

wonkish1 (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 8:49PM EDT (link)

I think everybody is pretty convinced of that.

I will admit that Johnson was a very, very good governor. But governors also don’t usually have to deal much in foreign policy or in social issues.

But one thing I have to give libertarians like Johnson is they are usually better and more passionate about fiscal issues than your average conservative.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

Johnson was a great Gov

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 2:13AM EDT (link)

I think he needs to be differentiated from Paul (who is more of a gadfly than anything else — and we all know what flies like to buzz around). He, unfortunately, stands no chance in the primary.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 

cej- I would be crying the day that Ron Paul or Gary Johnson were sworn into office

Scope (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 9:10PM EDT (link)

but I don’t have to even give another though to that. It’s like one kook leading the other between the two. Neither have the first chance of getting anywhere near the WH. Period, end of story, nada, zip, zilch. I would win a gazillion dollar lottery before that happened. The American people are sane.

 
 

Two ants fighting over a crumb

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:56PM EDT (link)

Hilarious!

 
 
 

Pence

oneconservative Friday, December 17th at 8:51PM EDT (link)

I would back him in a heart beat….

 

Love Pence, but not for 2012

Adjoran (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 11:46PM EDT (link)

He lacks serious administrative experience – I would certainly hope America has learned her lesson about hiring inexperienced Presidents after the Prancing Peacock. Pence should run for Governor or take a Cabinet department in the next Republican Administration to build his resume a bit before considering a run for the big job.

Ah, yes, the usual psycho libertine nuts like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson may run, and will be very popular among the tiny lunatic fringe that lives on such folly (there are apparently billions of nut cases on the interwebs willing to support the likes of those kooks, but most can’t manage to actually vote)

Pence's admin experience

Erick Erickson (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:50AM EDT (link)

He started one of the original state policy network free market think tanks in Indiana. It’s still going strong. He was a radio host for ten years.

He may not have government executive experience, but he had plenty of private sector, free-market executive experience before going to Washington.

Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?

Thank you for that info EE

Scope (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 11:18AM EDT (link)

and pilgrim lists additional executive experience in a comment below. It would be wise, if some who are claiming that he doesn’t have executive experience, to do some research before making that claim. His executive experience in the private sector, I would think, would make him all that more attractive.

 

It's not there.

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:52PM EDT (link)

People, trying to tout Mike Pence’s executive experience is like trying to tout Palin’s foreign policy experience around 2008.

Look, it just ..IS..NOT..THERE.

Don’t promote Pence by emphasizing his executive experience. People will just laugh in your face.

Emphasize he is somewhat of an outsider and a solid common-sense constitutional conservative.

He is Mike Pence.....

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:53PM EDT (link)

The…..

FORGOTTEN MAN!!

That is how you build his image.

Mike Pence is......

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:54PM EDT (link)

The….

LITTLE GUY!!!!

 
 
 
 
 

I hear you on the executive experience issue, but it sounds like he could be the conservative unity candidate

JSobieski (Diary) Friday, December 17th at 11:52PM EDT (link)

nt

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

Pence has executive experience in the private sector.

pilgrim (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 12:20AM EDT (link)

Born in Columbus, Bartholomew County, Ind., June 7, 1959; graduated from Hanover College, Hanover, Ind., 1981; J.D., Indiana University, 1986; admissions counselor, Hanover College, 1981-1983; attorney, private practice, 1986-1990; president, Indiana Policy Review Foundation, 1991-1994; host, political television show, 1995-1999; The Mike Pence Show, 1994-2000; Republican candidate for election to the One Hundredth Congress in 1986 and One Hundred First Congress in 1988; elected as a Republican to the One Hundred Seventh Congress (2000-present).

He is not someone like many in DC who are career politicians.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

I'm not seeing any real

georgeinla (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:45PM EDT (link)

executive experience there. Seems like he hasn’t done much outside of politics other than be a good talker.

Hi. I am a moby Greenie lawyer from Los Angeles who was not nearly smart enough to hide my tracks. Please assess my opinions accordingly.

I agree

bk (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 6:44AM EDT (link)

However great a guy Pence is, he’s never had to balance a large budget it appears. We saw in the last cycle why electing Congressmen is a bad idea.

If Pence is not going to run for governor, then perhaps the best place for him as part of building a winning ticket is as the VP on the ticket.

 
 

No executive experience there.

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:49PM EDT (link)

It is not there. None.

Sarah will have to prop him up quite a bit some if he is to be the TPM/Con/Libertarian champion.

 
 
 

My vote for dark horse: Barbour

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 2:37AM EDT (link)

Barbour is, as you note, acceptable to the establishment and the base: he was the establishment back when the establishment gave a frak about the principles they give lip service to now (RNC guy during the 1994 Contract with America). He has been involved in several national orgs, has apparently run his state successfully, and has extensive contacts as a result. As far as I know, he hasn’t alienated any significant constituent or voter group, and he has a potentially wide and deep donor base to tap into. He knows the ins and outs of national campaigns, and thus doesn’t have the same weakness of insularity that tend to hurt Govs. While I’m not sure I support him as my first choice quite yet (I’d like to see if he cut spending and taxes in addition to his excellent reforms), but he will be a strong contender in ’12, IMO.

Pence, Ryan, DeMint, and the other Congress kids mentioned ’round these parts are great — in Congress. Legislative jobs are radically different from executive positions, and the steep learning curve that would accompany a trip to the WH for any of those fine gentlemen would make implementing policy difficult, IMO. Moreover, we need as many seasoned (and proven) conservatives in Congress as possible: the new Tea Partiers need mentorship, and the (hopefully) Republican President in 2012 will need all the backup he can get to work out our budget issues.

Daniels, Christie*, Guiliani, and the rest of the strong purple/blue state execs set is made up of equally fantastic gents and executives: unfortunately, there are differences between themselves and social conservatives that make it unlikely that they would do well. Unfortunate, but c’est la vie.

Paul, Johnson, and the Great Libertarian Hopes: sorry libertarian-conservatives (all three of us! :) ), but it’s not going to fly. As anti-establishment as the mood is, drug legalization, the dismantling of extraneous federal government, and no intrastate federal regulation aren’t on the table: unfortunate, but Libertopia is not imminent (in part due to some libertarians’ too cool for school attitude). Neither is isolationist foreign policy (which is not quite so unfortunate).

McCrystal, Petraeus, and the Generals: fuhgeddaboudit.

Huck, Romney, Gingrich, and the rest of the Establishmentarian Sloppy Seconds (good prog rock album name, BTW): nope. Not going to happen. All have serious flaws that prevented them from winning the nomination last time around, and these flaws look even worse the second time around.

Palin: Not going to run — or if she does, it’ll be as a publicity stunt, and she will withdraw to endorse another conservative. She will be a kingmaker, though, and I can’t see her shifting her weight to the Generals or the Sloppy Seconds (interestingly, I could see her throwing her weight behind some of the purple/blue execs and even an outside chance of her endorsing one of the libertarians).

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

I Wouldn't Lump

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 10:33AM EDT (link)

Gingrich in with Romney and Huck.

He has more in common with Barbour, Daniels, and Ryan than those 2 yahoo’s.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 

Barbour

mboyle1988 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:20PM EDT (link)

is not acceptable to this base guy, at least. A tobacco lobbyist? No thanks. And he was head of the RGA. That reeks of establishment all around.

I love Mike Pence. I like Herman Cain. I could vote for Mitch Daniels if he apologized for his bone headed comment about social issues. I fantasize about President Palin, but don’t see a route to victory for her.

Didn't say he was acceptable to everyone

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:56PM EDT (link)

However, those are cosmetic complaints (particularly the RGA one) that preclude pretty much anyone with actual experience and substance from running.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

The RGA was the only GOP organization displaying any competence in 2010

JSobieski (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 2:00PM EDT (link)

Moreover, they didn’t display any of the errors that the R Senate Committee did (i.e. undercutting conservatives in the primary).

The RGA was a true asset for conservatives. Barbour is an interesting potential candidate in many respects.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

 

The RGA was the only GOP organization displaying any competence in 2010

JSobieski (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 2:00PM EDT (link)

Moreover, they didn’t display any of the errors that the R Senate Committee did (i.e. undercutting conservatives in the primary).

The RGA was a true asset for conservatives. Barbour is an interesting potential candidate in many respects.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

Actually

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 2:06PM EDT (link)

It was the RSLC that showed the most competence. They run the state legislative races of which we netted almost 700 seats. The only organization that exceeded GOP expectations. And exceeded expectations by a very large margin. The highest predictions for state legislative seats going into the election was in the 500-600 range. The RSLC blew that completely out of the water. And trust me how well the state legislative races were orchestrated first hand.

The person who ran the RSLC was Ed Gillespie.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

You're Both Wrong! ;p

IJB Saturday, December 18th at 3:47PM EDT (link)

In fact, the NRCC displayed as much competence as the RGA and the RSLC – the NRCC played the general election campaign, especially, brilliantly.

All three groups did excellent work this cycle. :)

In the Case of the NRCC

wonkish1 (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 4:07PM EDT (link)

They did a good job, but they did very badly in North Carolina for example. And they should have one a handful of races in Indiana, New York, California, Minnesota, Oregon, Connecticut, and Mass that they didn’t.

A lot of that is debatable, but North Carolina provides the prime comparison between the NRCC and RSLC. In North Carolina the NRCC should have taken 3 races that they didn’t win. Yet somehow down the ballot in that very state the RSLC shellacked the Dems across the state in the state legislative elections. It is no easy feat to win down ballot when up the ballot we are losing. And for that Ed Gillespie and the RSLC deserves our thanks.

But yes all 3 performed well. I would argue that the RSLC performed the most well though by being the only organization to completely trounce its projections.

“First you win the argument, then you win the vote.” Margaret Thatcher

Conservative Innovations I Want To See Succeed
http://rightnetwork.com/ –New conservative TV network
http://actright.com/ –Fundraising hub for all things conservative
http://connect.freedomworks.org/ — Connecting Tea Partiers around the country
http://procinct.net/ –GOTV walk/call lists
http://www.citizensunited.org/ –Their documentary arm

 
 
 
 
 
 

I live Pence

georgeinla (Diary) Saturday, December 18th at 1:48PM EDT (link)

But I’d say that he needs to run for Governor or Senator, then get back to us in a few years.

Hi. I am a moby Greenie lawyer from Los Angeles who was not nearly smart enough to hide my tracks. Please assess my opinions accordingly.

Lack of Executive experience is the problem

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:47PM EDT (link)

Yes, it would be nice if he was tested like Sarah or Daniels or Perry.

 
 

Wow Im Honnor

freemanja1991 (Diary) Sunday, December 19th at 1:24PM EDT (link)

To spur this much Discussion. And that someone reads my Work thank you all.

 

right on Pence

ustraveler Monday, December 20th at 12:28AM EDT (link)

Bumnp J-Bush right a little,Thune and Daniels right a little more, Barbour left a little Romney left a llittle more still, Huckabee up a little, Gingrich down and left a little, Perry down a little, Palin down a lot, and what are you left with? Mike Pence exactly where you put him.

 

Nice thought but I'm not sure I agree with your name placement

Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 9:20AM EDT (link)

How long did you take in placing the names?

Frankly, I think Daniels will be just as good as Pence in many regards despite his opponents attempts to make him ONLY about his one statement on social truces.

The truth is that Daniels is one of the few if ONLY candidates who can say “I’ve made government smaller” and he has done so while improving it as well.

He’s also a rock solid conservative and would give us a whole generation of conservative judges.

Finally, he’s one of the few who I think has the guts to tackle entitlements.

********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts

Sorry, he doesn't get it and neither do you

haumea (Diary) Tuesday, December 21st at 7:59AM EDT (link)

It’s not about all the well-worn, by-the-book, conservative standbys like spending and judges. The next president must restore America’s future by taking the fight to the left where they eat and sleep (our schools, bureaucracy, the courts, the UN, etc.)

Daniels is a chicken who will not wage war.

 
 

Nice thought but I'm not sure I agree with your name placement

Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 9:20AM EDT (link)

How long did you take in placing the names?

Frankly, I think Daniels will be just as good as Pence in many regards despite his opponents attempts to make him ONLY about his one statement on social truces.

The truth is that Daniels is one of the few if ONLY candidates who can say “I’ve made government smaller” and he has done so while improving it as well.

He’s also a rock solid conservative and would give us a whole generation of conservative judges.

Finally, he’s one of the few who I think has the guts to tackle entitlements.

********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts

It's not just the

Scope (Diary) Monday, December 20th at 10:18AM EDT (link)

“truce” statement. He also spoke out in support of VAT. I believe he also said that at some point we are going to have to raise taxes. He is also in favor of cutting the defense budget, more so than even the Gates recommendations. Any Republican that wants to cut defense even more than the Democrats, that usually strip the Defense budget, won’t get much support from the national security conservatives. I believe that while he may have done a great job in his state, he already angered some fiscons, some socons, and some securitycons. What strong base would he have left?

 
 

If Pence wants it, he can win it, BUT.....

sapwolf Monday, December 20th at 2:43PM EDT (link)

The problems for Pence are the following:

1) Palin may run and of course she’ll probably win if she does.
2) Pence does not have executive/leadership experience.
3) Pence’s TPM support may not be 100%on board just yet.

To win, here is what Pence MUST do:

1) Fight Obama and the Progressive Left EVERY DAMN DAY! This will show Sarah that he is BRAVE and not afraid and is the baddest *ss mofo out there and WILL go medieval on the Progressive Movement. If he can show that he can TAKE media attention away from Palin due to the increased FEAR in him by the Left, it will solidify him as the ANTI-OBAMA. He must be FULL-COURT PRESS fighting the Left with columns 4 times per week, speaking out against the enemy in Congress, interviews, visits to Iowa and New Hampshire.

2) BE SARAH’s CHAMPION! Only if he proves to her and the grassroots that he is both worthy and fearless and ready for the fight that will need a Lincolnesque strong leader to face the rioting of people in the cities and the intense LSM hatred that will pull off of Palin and go onto him. With her endorsement, he will run away with the GOP nomination. He’ll pick Rubio for his Veep and we win.

That is how you win if you are Mike Pence.

Basically, you do it by becoming the grassroots champion in place of Palin assuming she does not run.

I agree

haumea (Diary) Tuesday, December 21st at 7:54AM EDT (link)

He must fearlessly and continuously take on the left. Before and after.

 
 

Thune is an Ethanol Patsy - Why is he on the list?

lisamiller Monday, December 20th at 3:41PM EDT (link)

Let’s see..Rahm Emmanuel gives big bucks to farmers. Farmers lobby Congress for Lame Duck windfall (because voters would throw them out if they did it BEFORE the election) and establishment give five billion in ethanol subsidies, is ramming WITH Republican support the Food Safety Bill, increase the estate tax to 35% over five million…so what we got for the THEFT was higher food prices, more inefficient planting, misdirection of investment, more pollution, more taxes, erosion of savings and investment and the elimination of the small farmer.

Yes, those establishment types are a cancer that needs to be irradicated in the primary.

 

Thune is an Ethanol Patsy - Why is he on the list?

lisamiller Monday, December 20th at 3:41PM EDT (link)

Let’s see..Rahm Emmanuel gives big bucks to farmers. Farmers lobby Congress for Lame Duck windfall (because voters would throw them out if they did it BEFORE the election) and establishment give five billion in ethanol subsidies, is ramming WITH Republican support the Food Safety Bill, increase the estate tax to 35% over five million…so what we got for the THEFT was higher food prices, more inefficient planting, misdirection of investment, more pollution, more taxes, erosion of savings and investment and the elimination of the small farmer.

Yes, those establishment types are a cancer that needs to be irradicated in the primary.

 

Huckabee

madjayhawk Tuesday, December 21st at 12:27AM EDT (link)

Any analysis that ignores Mike Huckabee is flawed. Huckabee is a minister and there are strong elements within the groups that vote in Republican primaries that are in tune to someone like Huckabee. He won in Iowa (I think) with a small organization and no money because the Christian right wants a religious man/woman in the White House irregardless of his/qualifications and the more religious the better. Romney should have been the nominee in 2006. He is the best qualified person either party has had run since I can remember. He got knocked out of the race before he could put a stake in McCain’s cold heart by a preacher man by people voting for a strongly religious man who was running against a man who belongs to a religion most maintstream Christians do not like. As long as Iowa is the starting point Huckabee has a chance and will run over the Pences, Pawlentys, Daniels, etc. Huckabee will struggle against Romney and Palin if they are still in the race and have the money to overcome the religious factor. Pence, Daniels and Romney, one of them, should be the Republican candidate if Republicans have a brain, but I do not see it. Huckabee/Palin or Palin/Huckabee. God help us.

Mad Jayhawk

 

Palin should stick with what she does best!!!

capeconservative Thursday, December 23rd at 2:42PM EDT (link)

Her support of conservative candidates all across America!!!! After watching her television series, it is quite apparent that she is in love with Alaska and her way of life. Supporting individuals – and she has a pretty good batting average so far! – can be done from her home studio. I respect her immensely however her name is a magnet for the ‘elite’ in the media and in political circles. I would much rather she ‘keep on keeping on’ and Americans from coast to coast will benefit. If anyone is interested in Mike Pence, check out his article at Hillsdale.edu. He was the featured commentator in the November (I believe) Imprimis newsletter and his comments on what the presidency should be are much to be admired! And if he becomes president and wants a knowledgeable Secretary of Energy, then he can request Sarah Palin’s service. As a final thought, with today’s electronic world, I would like to see an END to Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina telling the rest of us who is going to be our presidential candidate!!!! Surely there could be a NATIONAL PRIMARY DAY where we could all have a say in this most important decision!