Jonathan Pollard


I have known Jennifer Rubin for a while and really like her, but I am terribly befuddled about her Washington Post blog “Right Turn.” It has descended into advocacy of getting the traitor Jonathan Pollard out of prison.

First, I have no idea why that has anything to do with coverage of conservatives and secondly, I think she’s gone a bridge too far now.

Certainly there are some noted people like George Shultz who are happy to have Pollard released, but Jennifer writes, “Conservatives in effect have offered Obama all the support he might need should he be inclined to pardon Pollard.”

Jonathan Pollard was a spy for hire who was hired by Israel, South Africa, and potentially other countries. He ratted out our intelligence and potentially cost people their lives because of it.

There are few conservatives within the actual conservative movement who are paying attention, but the bulk of those who are do not want Pollard released. They want him hanged or shot as a traitor to his country.

I realize there are people who believe our alliance with Israel outweighs every other consideration and they are forced to make logical leaps to defend or mitigate Jonathan Pollard’s actions. But let’s be clear that Jonathan Pollard is a traitor to his country and those defending him or mitigating what he did are defending a traitor with blood on his hands.

Were Barack Obama to release this traitor, it would not help him politically. It would yet again cause people to question his world view — something he is desperate to avoid.

Conservatives have offered nothing to Barack Obama in exchange for a Pollard pardon. To say so stretches the very definition of “conservatives” to the point that the word has no meaning. In this case, it appears “conservatives” means a handful of very old Cold Warriors. And Jenn Rubin.

Count the majority of conservatives out.

Closing point: I cannot fathom why right now when the right is having to defend itself from accusations of murder, Jenn Rubin is using a Washington Post platform to cover conservatives to claim conservatives want to help a traitor to this country.


Category: ,

RSS feed

158 Comments Leave a comment

I am sure of it

mutantone Wednesday, January 12th at 5:10AM EDT (link)

Obama will pardon him just to further his own efforts to ruin the nation, after all it is what a Marxist would do.

 

No Special Treatment

reaganiterepublicanresistance Wednesday, January 12th at 5:13AM EDT (link)

I guess the thinking goes that Pollard “only” spied for allied nations- but if the US wants their friends to know something, they’ll tell them.

There can be no gray area with espionage like this- perhaps Pollard has conservative connections in this country tho, I had a college bud who knew Pollard in High School- and his family were major Republicans in CT

Not Just for Allies

LargeBill Wednesday, January 12th at 8:08AM EDT (link)

While that is the line being used by his supporters, Pollard did not just spy for our “friends.” Israel may be the country vocal about wanting this turd released, but he spied for other countries as well including Pakistan. We shouldn’t be having this debate. He should have been in front of a firing squad decades ago.

 
 

Erick, the bigger question is....

bananabee Wednesday, January 12th at 5:36AM EDT (link)

Why are you so concerned with the fact that some people want Pollard freed from prison?? What does it matter to you in any way, shape, or form? Trying to bolster your independent cred now that you are a radio host and need numbers?

Please focus your efforts on destroying msnbc and all of its psychotic anchors instead of picking inter-party fights that really dont mean that much

I guess the question is bananabee why do YOU...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 5:58AM EDT (link)

care enough about Pollard to perhaps have your account shut down for your ignorant tone with Erick. I hardly find this blog by him to be in anyway an independent thought in that he takes her to task for WASTING valuable space on traitors sitting in jail instead of furthering the Conservative Movement, well if that is what she has that space for.

BTW do no act as if you are the boss of Erick telling him what and what not to focus on, as you may know Conservatives can walk and chew gum at the same time!

Who are YOU?

bananabee Wednesday, January 12th at 6:32AM EDT (link)

Im sorry but who are YOU to make threats about my account being shut down because I disagreed with his post?!

Why Erick would waste his time/effort on the Jonathan Pollard issues is still beyond me…but I really dont care for your lecture about my ‘tone’

Well your TONE...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 6:53AM EDT (link)

is a tad belittling, neigh bellicose to Erick because he chose to write about something other then MSDNC. He is bringing to us the stupidity of those in positions of power and while I don’t like that the Washington Post has any power, they do and that writer is wasting her time on a TRAITOR. I personally will contact my Congressman and Senator and ask why it is that anyone would think to let loose a traitor to the United States of America and that he should languish and die in jail for his crimes.

 

When RINOs Stump For Spies, We'll Point It Out

clefi Wednesday, January 12th at 8:19AM EDT (link)

Yet, we appreciate those of us who can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. Luckily for those folks, we can and will.

Anyway: Considering who we’re talking about, how could Obama not pardon a traitor?? If nothing else, it would appeal to his narcissistic side instinctively knowing how tough our history will view Obama.

Read: Why Pollard Should Never Be Released (The Traitor)

AND considering all the filth Clinton pardoned, what does that say about Pollard AND Obama when he pardons him?? (ROFL!)

 

I'm guessing

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 8:42AM EDT (link)

things that are “beyond you” takes in a lot of waterfront.

In the future, lay off the scolding.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 

You clearly have no concept

Dan McLaughlin (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 9:31AM EDT (link)

of how much space Jennifer Rubin wasted on this crusade before Erick responded.

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill

Dan, I checked Rubin's blog and see two recent entries

red_oakster (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:06PM EDT (link)

One was Jan 4th reporting on a letter signed by 500 religious leaders asking for Pollard’s release. The second was the entry yesterday about George Schultz’s call for commutation.

I may be missing something here, but that hardly seems like a “crusade”.

The Pollard sentence has been a controversy for a long time and it clearly splits conservatives. And among people who had direct knowledge of Pollard’s espionage there also are clear divisions about whether the trial judge’s rejection of the plea bargain was a necessary rejection of a corrupt deal or an act of duplicity. I remember very compelling arguments in favor of Pollard by (then Reaganite) superlawyer Theodore Olson (long before he changed teams) and against Pollard by Strategic Studies maven Eliot Cohen.

Like most, I have no inside knowledge and I see that very distinguished folks like Schultz or Weinberger who did or do have knowledge came to diametrically opposed conclusions. It looks to me as if reasonable people can differ on this issue, and I also note with sadness, that as of my post, none of the directors have commented on the post by cobra who viciously accused American Jews of dual loyalty.

 
 
 

This Conservative wants NO pardon for...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 5:54AM EDT (link)

any TRAITOR no matter whom they spied for. It is silly on the face of it and Ms Rubin should say exactly who these supposed “Conservatives” are that want Pollard released because I am unaware of any within my sphere of people.

This Conservative wants him pardoned!

bananabee Wednesday, January 12th at 6:35AM EDT (link)

He spied for Israel, our friend and ally, and the information he gained was fairly harmless.

We shouldnt be jailing or ‘hanging’ our friends

Let him go

That Israel had someone spying for them against US...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 6:55AM EDT (link)

does not make them a friend. He should HANG, as should all who spy against the United States of America, then there would be some angst at spying against us. Friends don’t spy on friends not in the real world.

 

Ignorant

LargeBill Wednesday, January 12th at 8:13AM EDT (link)

He did not spy ONLY for our ally. He also spied for other countries including Pakistan.

Treason and spying have very heavy penalties in order to discourage others from committing those offenses. If you don’t think those are serious charges then don’t be surprised if most folks don’t consider you a serious person.

 
 
 

Republicans in CT

atillathehun Wednesday, January 12th at 6:43AM EDT (link)

I think the fact that Pollard has pull within the Republican party may have said it all. The difference between Republicans generally and the conservative point of view is sometimes profound.
My memory is vague on the case details but I belive that Pollard was working for the buck rather for the interest of Israel and even if that was not the case dual alliegance is not possible. Execution is really deseved.

 

Republicans in CT

atillathehun Wednesday, January 12th at 6:43AM EDT (link)

I think the fact that Pollard has pull within the Republican party may have said it all. The difference between Republicans generally and the conservative point of view is sometimes profound.
My memory is vague on the case details but I belive that Pollard was working for the buck rather for the interest of Israel and even if that was not the case dual alliegance is not possible. Execution is really deseved.

 

Surprised

nhbuckeye Wednesday, January 12th at 7:14AM EDT (link)

The guys spied for Israel and the Dems aren’t screaming for the death penalty? Strange!

I really do not understand our squishy attitudes towards traitors. Towards children who commit crimes, sure. But adults who work against our own country to harm our own people? Sorry, there aren’t any second chances. There cannot be.

 

Okay, my bad

nhbuckeye Wednesday, January 12th at 7:22AM EDT (link)

While I am a stickler about treason, after doing some more reading about Mr. Pollard, the punishment does seem not to fit the crime. He was given a life sentence for a crime that usually gets two to four years. I don’t know if that were accurately reported, but clearly that is not justice if it is true.

calling b.s. on this

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 9:40AM EDT (link)

Provide a cite to back up this rather exotic claim. Regardless of any conduct by the government, the plea bargain his lawyers wanted involved the possibility of a life sentence… which is what he got.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

I have seen some other conservatives jump on the Pollard bandwagon

kyle8 (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 7:25AM EDT (link)

It is perplexing, sort of like a right wing version of the free Mumia Jamal movement.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

That's funny you bring up that name kyle...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 7:27AM EDT (link)

I truly believe that when Obama loses in 2012 that he will pardon Mumia and that is a nasty thought.

probably

kyle8 (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 7:31AM EDT (link)

It is also an indictment against Obama that he has not gotten out in front of this fingerpointing. Sure, he himself has not said that conservatives are to blame for their rhetoric. But neither has he come out and told his own people to cool it.

A total lack of leadership.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 

he can't

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 9:11AM EDT (link)

Mumia is a state, not a federal, prisoner.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 

Pollard Wants Out?????

jeffersonian76 Wednesday, January 12th at 7:42AM EDT (link)

Of course he does!!! And people in Hell want ice water, so what? If he isn’t bright enough to get a turban and change his name to Mahmoud Abdul whatever, he’s not even close to the pals-of-baracko gravy train. Remember the New Yorker cover with baracko abdul and michelle shabazz doing the fist bump, while the Constitution burns in the fireplace? True enough.

Speaking of Arizona, condolences to families of the nameless dead and injured —- but why is some congressperson ‘more important’ than the rancher who was murdered by mexican invaders? or our fallen border patrol agents? It appears Tucson is as close to the border as baracko will get.

 

get your facts straight

evas Wednesday, January 12th at 8:23AM EDT (link)

Pollard gave Israel information that was supposed to be shared with them, that the US illegally withheld. This information led to Israel’s bombing of the Iraqi nuclear reactor, for which they were later begrudgingly thanked ( after of course first being loudly condemned) and which was a benefit to everyone in the world. The US also broke a plea bargain which was made. He was never even charged with treason. His sentence was much greater than other spies , including spies who caused deaths to Americans, unlike Pollard. He didn’t do it for money. He did it to help OUR ALLY, Israel.

crap

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 9:10AM EDT (link)

how can a nation “illegally” withhold it’s own secrets? It can’t. Intelligence sharing is always conditional. Regardless of his intent he had a duty to not reveal information in his possession to another country, that duty doesn’t say “except countries you like.”

Want to name some of these spies who are serving less time than Pollard?

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

He may have spied for Israel . . .

Hancock Wednesday, January 12th at 8:24AM EDT (link)

But one of the main things that he stole was the SIOP — Single Integrated Operational Plan. The SIOP is our complete battle strategy, target packages, and options for escalation/restraint in a nuclear war.

It probably isnt an understatement to say that the SIOP is perhaps the single most important secret our government has, particularly more so at the time when he was doing his spying. While he may have been working for Israel, they would have likely not had much use directly for the information in the plan themselves — I dont think Tel Aviv was on our targeting list.

However, there was at least one customer who would do anything for this information, the USSR. So what Pollard gave the Israelis on the SIOP could then be sold or traded by them to the Soviets to secure something for Israel’s advantage or grant them leverage on issues of emigration of persecuted Soviet Jews to Israel which was a huge issue at the time.

I do remember reading that around the time Pollard stole this info, Soviet attack subs started showing up at patrol points unexpectedly and frequently right where our otherwise undetectable SSBN’s were at. Between knowledge of SSBN routes and the SIOP in general, it is not an exaggeration to say that had the Soviet leadership decided to, there would have been a good chance they could have pulled off a decapitation strke of the US, destroyed our retaliatory deterrent, and if he had waited to launch on impact rather than launch on warning, come off relatively unscathed.

So, for his betrayal of these vital nuclear secrets, I would say that Pollard is one of the worst spies in American history — perhaps even the worst, since the Rosenbergs provided info to the Soviets that allowed them to get the bombs earlier, but the Sovs would have eventually figured it out. Pollard gave the enemy the key, through the intermediary of a self-interested friend, to completely and utterly destroy our country.

There should be no clemency or pardon or parole for him at all. He should have been shot.

(and lest anyone get the wrong impression, I do consider Israel to be a strong friend and ally of the US. But like any other nation, they are going to do what is in their nation’s best interest first. If that includes passing/trading info they got from Pollard on to the Soviets, in order to get persecuted people released, or terrorists off their back, they are going to do it. That’s what most all nations do — so the blame here needs to be squarely put on the scum Pollard)

 

Pollard the traitor...

kpbenware Wednesday, January 12th at 8:43AM EDT (link)

…is in prison, but does not belong there. He should have been executed for his treason, and keeping him alive, year after year, at the expense of the very people that he betrayed for money, is offensive.

Should the current POTUS pardon his sorry ass, it will just reinforce the belief that he does not care about the American people, and is in fact, doing what he can to destroy us from within.

 

Catching Pollard

Kudzu (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 9:19AM EDT (link)

Great book, if you’re posting in this thread then you need to read it.

Pollard was the wost kind of spy, akin to Hansen and Conrad. He sought out to spy on his nation and betray the secrets that cost lives. Pollard did not just spy for Israel he sought them out even after they rejected him because they thought he was a false-flag set up.

But he continued to pass off intelligence and the Israeli’s continued to accept it. He should of been executed after his exploitation and co-conspirators were found out but we no longer execute traitors.

It always did take two of you to take down one of me. – Jo Bob Priddy, North Dallas Forty.

Now on at http://kudzu630.wordpress.com/

 

Our country doesn't have the guts anymore

ihateliberals Wednesday, January 12th at 9:25AM EDT (link)

to do what is right. We can’t for some reason treat traitors as traitors. Jane Fonda should have been arrested and tried for treason and then executed accordingly. Pollard should have had the same fate as a treasonous traitor. The penalty for Treason in this country has been death but for some reason we have forgotten that. To continue to call Pollard a Republican Conservative is insulting to all of us that are true Constitution loving conservatives.

 

Re: Mr. Erickson's accusation

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 9:51AM EDT (link)

Erick Erickson wrote: “Jonathan Pollard was a spy for hire who was hired by Israel, South Africa, and potentially other countries….”

Ron Olive alleged that Pollard gave classified material to South Africa. Is there independent confimation of this allegation, other than from Ron Olive?

 

Re: Mr. Erickson's accusation

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 9:51AM EDT (link)

Erick Erickson wrote: “Jonathan Pollard was a spy for hire who was hired by Israel, South Africa, and potentially other countries….”

Ron Olive alleged that Pollard gave classified material to South Africa. Is there independent confimation of this allegation, other than from Ron Olive?

your point being?

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 10:08AM EDT (link)

The Australian government testified during his trial that he’d tried to provide them with classified material.

Are you saying the lead investigator is somehow unreliable? Care to provide evidence?

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

My point being streiff.....

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 10:15AM EDT (link)

….I am not saying no. I am asking for documentation and evidence, from you and from Mr. Erickson. Don’t just make an allegation. Present your evidence. You say the “lead investigator” said the following. Again I am not saying no. But where is YOUR substantiation. How about providing some web sites or documents that we can examine. From what I have read (admittedly I am no expert on this issue) the US case against Pollard, was that he passed classified information “to Israel.”

What can you produce to prove otherwise? I am waiting.

 

My point being streiff.....

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 10:15AM EDT (link)

….I am not saying no. I am asking for documentation and evidence, from you and from Mr. Erickson. Don’t just make an allegation. Present your evidence. You say the “lead investigator” said the following. Again I am not saying no. But where is YOUR substantiation. How about providing some web sites or documents that we can examine. From what I have read (admittedly I am no expert on this issue) the US case against Pollard, was that he passed classified information “to Israel.”

What can you produce to prove otherwise? I am waiting.

we don't owe you that

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 10:25AM EDT (link)

Pollard’s acts are part of the public record that Pollard has not contested. Olive’s book encapsulates what is in the still classified government response to the plea agreement. So I’m not much interested in “your understanding.”

It is your responsibility to refute the public record, not mine to prove what has already been proven in court.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Isn't this a distraction?

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 10:38AM EDT (link)

On your part and Erickson’s part? The reason most Americans who want Pollard to remain in jail, is because Pollard passed on to Israel “classified U.S. data concerning Iraq, Syria and other Arab states, including evidence of Saddam Hussein’s development of chemical weapons.”

That has been the issue. What is your and Erickson’s position on this rationale?

 

Isn't this a distraction?

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 10:38AM EDT (link)

On your part and Erickson’s part? The reason most Americans who want Pollard to remain in jail, is because Pollard passed on to Israel “classified U.S. data concerning Iraq, Syria and other Arab states, including evidence of Saddam Hussein’s development of chemical weapons.”

That has been the issue. What is your and Erickson’s position on this rationale?

your "rationale"

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 10:46AM EDT (link)

is simply a figment of your imagination made up with no supporting evidence for the purpose, as far as I can see, of rationalizing espionage.

Most Americans want Pollard to remain in jail, along with Hansen and Ames and Walker, because they are spies for foreign countries and that is what happens to spies.

Most Americans want our laws enforced.

If you want to make the case that our “allies”, a very changing set of countries given the status of Poland, Hungary, etc today vs 20 years ago, have the right to steal our intelligence, just go ahead and make the case. If you want to make the case that government officials entrusted to handled classified material have no obligation to safeguard that information and can, in fact, treat it as their own and accept a salary from a foreign country for giving it to them, feel free.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

My guess is you speak for Erick Erickson

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 10:54AM EDT (link)

That is what I figured by the tenor of this piece by Mr. Erickson.

You wrote, alluding to Israel: “If you want to make the case that our “allies”, a very changing set of countries given the status of Poland, Hungary, etc today vs 20 years ago, have the right to steal our intelligence, just go ahead and make the case.”

In your and Erickson’s view, Israel is our purported “ally,” because allies are “a very changing set of countries.” In your and Erickson’s view, Mr. Streiff, Israel is not an ally but an enemy. I got it.

 

My guess is you speak for Erick Erickson

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 10:54AM EDT (link)

That is what I figured by the tenor of this piece by Mr. Erickson.

You wrote, alluding to Israel: “If you want to make the case that our “allies”, a very changing set of countries given the status of Poland, Hungary, etc today vs 20 years ago, have the right to steal our intelligence, just go ahead and make the case.”

In your and Erickson’s view, Israel is our purported “ally,” because allies are “a very changing set of countries.” In your and Erickson’s view, Mr. Streiff, Israel is not an ally but an enemy. I got it.

a couple of points

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 10:59AM EDT (link)

1. I speak for myself. If you want to address Erick do so but I’m not an employee.

2. Reading comprehension would really be your friend if you’d let it.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

This is what Erickson wrote

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:11AM EDT (link)

“I realize there are people who believe our alliance with Israel OUTWEIGHS EVERY OTHER CONSIDERATION (emphasis mine) and they are forced to make logical leaps to defend or mitigate Jonathan Pollard’s actions. But let’s be clear that Jonathan Pollard is a traitor to his country and those defending him or mitigating what he did are defending a traitor with blood on his hands….”

True, Pollard committed treason. If, as you wrote, Israel is a purported “ally,” indeed she may be an enemy state. No one that I have read or respect believes “our alliance(s) outweigh every other consideration.” The question I have seen is this. What punishment did spies (for non-enemy states) receive for similar offences to Pollards? If, like you, Erickson believes Israel is America’s “ally,” then Erickson would argue Pollard should be hung or stay in jail. Erickson is an attorney. His statement that Pollard has “blood on his hands,” where is the evidence?

 

This is what Erickson wrote

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:11AM EDT (link)

“I realize there are people who believe our alliance with Israel OUTWEIGHS EVERY OTHER CONSIDERATION (emphasis mine) and they are forced to make logical leaps to defend or mitigate Jonathan Pollard’s actions. But let’s be clear that Jonathan Pollard is a traitor to his country and those defending him or mitigating what he did are defending a traitor with blood on his hands….”

True, Pollard committed treason. If, as you wrote, Israel is a purported “ally,” indeed she may be an enemy state. No one that I have read or respect believes “our alliance(s) outweigh every other consideration.” The question I have seen is this. What punishment did spies (for non-enemy states) receive for similar offences to Pollards? If, like you, Erickson believes Israel is America’s “ally,” then Erickson would argue Pollard should be hung or stay in jail. Erickson is an attorney. His statement that Pollard has “blood on his hands,” where is the evidence?

as I don't make any

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:19AM EDT (link)

of those arguments I don’t feel any particular need to indulge you in your rather creepy fixation on Erick.

I’m also not your research service though I’m sort of perplexed as to what difference it makes as to which country you’re spying for. The statute doesn’t give you a get out jail free card just because your paymaster is a friendly power.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

I addressed Erickson below

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:42AM EDT (link)

Streiff, you are the one who seems to have creepy fixations. You wrote, “most Americans want our laws enforced.” Fine. I want our laws enforced.

I am not at all active on this issue. Those who defend Pollard, “claim that Pollard spied for an ally instead of an enemy, that his sentence was out of proportion when compared to similar crimes, and that the US failed to live up to its plea bargain.”

But in your statement above, you infer Israel is an “ally,” in quotes. I do not think it takes much insight to see what you are saying about Israel. I am asking Mr. Erickson, do you agree with Steiff, Israel is one ‘our “allies,” a very changing set of countries’. (?)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I am addressing Mr. Erickson directly

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:13AM EDT (link)

Please Mr. Erickson, I am addressing you directly above.

 

Stunned and disappointed

mikerazar (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:25AM EDT (link)

We had an intelligence sharing understanding with Israel. The anti-semites, who had infiltrated the Reagan administration, led by Baker and Weinberger frustrated the intent of that understanding. Pollard wrongly took matters into his own hands and even more wrongly took money in exchange. For that he deserved some punishment but not the excessive sentence he received.

Should Israel, our best source of intelligence ever, have risked its own security by turning down intelligence on its enemies? Would our government turn down sketchy information from anywhere if national security was at stake?

I hope it doesn’t cost me my membership on Redstate, but the flip suggestions that Pollard be executed are disgusting. All the more so by people I respected.

I guess the conservative movement isn’t concerned about consolidating its recent gains in the Jewish community. I hope 2012 is a landslide, but if FL and the upper midwest are close, look for Obama to find it in his heart to commute Pollard’s sentence over the objections of “right wing extremists”.

Erick, you don’t HAVE to comment on every topic in the world. Sometimes a discreet silence is more helpful.

We have a nation to save, people.

me too

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:33AM EDT (link)

I’m stunned that anyone could defend espionage and cavalierly assume that the end recipient of purloined information isn’t remarketing that information to someone else. The latter belief is only possible if you also believe in leprechauns.

I’m disappointed that anyone who considers themselves pro-Israel could possibly defend Pollard, especially the American Jewish community whom the left perpetually accuses of having “dual loyalties.”

Howard Baker and Cap Weinberger were hardly anti-Semites. I’d suggest you refrain from tossing that garbage around in the future. To the point, State and Defense control intelligence sharing agreements not the other way around.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

What is dual loyalty Streiff?

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:47AM EDT (link)

How about defining it, in so far as Israel is concerned, since you brought it up.

 

What is dual loyalty Streiff?

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:47AM EDT (link)

How about defining it, in so far as Israel is concerned, since you brought it up.

if you have to ask this question

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:51AM EDT (link)

you really have no business participating in this thread.

Seriously. Look it up.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

No, I want you to define it.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:56AM EDT (link)

Please don’t duck my question Streiff. I am asking you to define it. Then I will respond.

And I want a pony. nt

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:00PM EDT (link)

Back to lurking.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 

I want a pony, too

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:05PM EDT (link)

I want one with the horny thing on his forehead.

You’re in no position to demand anything. You haven’t figured it out on your own so I just thought I’d tell you.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 
 

Weinberger had a particular antipathy for Israel.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:54AM EDT (link)

Casper Weinberger, who was born of a Jewish father, led the charge in Reagan’s cabinet, to punish Israel for bombing Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor, June 1981. Reagan indeed order UN ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick to condemn Israel in the United Nations. During US (Gulf) wars against Iraq, the Americans were grateful Israel destroyed Sadaam’s nuclear capability. I will never forget when in 1983, the US Marine Barracks in Lebanan were destroyed by a Shi’ite (Iranian / Hezbollah) suicide bomber, murdering some 241 US marines. Israel offered the US, help evacuating the wounded to its nearby hospitals in the north, in Haifa. Secretary of Defense Weinberger turned down Israel’s offer of assistance, choosing instead to ship the wounded all the way to Germany.

antipathy for Israel

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:00PM EDT (link)

isn’t anti-semitism.

None of the other stuff you mention is either 1) wrong or 2) has a bearing on the Pollard case.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

It has bearing on Weinberger's motives

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:10PM EDT (link)

I think

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:11PM EDT (link)

his motive was punishing espionage.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 
 

I'll stand by my garbage and my presumed belief in leprechauns.

mikerazar (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:56AM EDT (link)

To this day, the information given to Israel by Pollard is not public. Clinton and Bush reneged on promises to the Israelis to commute the sentence.

But your insulting implication that my pro-America and pro -Israel bona-fides are in question makes me doubt your conservative credentials. You’re just another RINO to me.

We have a nation to save, people.

maybe

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:01PM EDT (link)

but I’m a RINO who just pulled your account.

Learn some manners then hit the “contact” button.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

So much for speech.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:07PM EDT (link)

I thought it was the left who tries to stiffle debate.

correction

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:08PM EDT (link)

“stifle”

 

the concept

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:12PM EDT (link)

is “private property”. Usually conservatives understand that, YMMV.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 

If you have issues with moderation, there's a Contact link at the top

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:16PM EDT (link)

But pay attention to streiff – this is not a free speech question. This is a “Redstate is private property and we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone we damn well please” question.

Your choice as whether to accept that or not.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 

Listen well, steve53

Neil Stevens (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:18PM EDT (link)

That banning as an exercise in free speech of the proprietors of this website.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 
 

So much for speech.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:07PM EDT (link)

I thought it was the left who tries to stiffle debate.

 
 
 
 

mikerazar

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:46AM EDT (link)

I am a thirty eight year registered (conservative) Republican, former Republican party activist. Though the left seems to be the repository of racism, bigotry and anti-Semitism today – and in particular, I believe on the part of this disciple of Jeremiah Wright who is in the White House – make no mistake about it, there is anti-Semitism in the GOP. I’ve seen it first hand.

and you've worked for

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:55AM EDT (link)

Howard Baker and Cap Weinberger?

I’ve no doubt that anti-semitism exists. I think libeling a couple of very dedicated men is out of bounds.

In the 80s I think a lot of State and Defense officials believed that we were too closely aligned with Israel for our own good and that by a more even handed treatment we could win over Arab allies. To a large extent that policy was proven correct with our relations with Egypt.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

What is "even handed" when dealing with jihad terror?

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:03PM EDT (link)

How can you be even handed between good and evil Streiff? What do you know about the global jihad? Who and what have you read post-9/11? What and who have you read about the Muslim-world war against Israel and the West? You speak of dual loyalty and “even handedness.” Whose side are you on?

Streiff is on our side

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:30PM EDT (link)

The question at hand is, are we a sovereign country with control over our intelligence, or not? If we are, we have the right to not share information with Israel, no matter what their (or your) opinion on the matter is. We also, as a sovereign country, have the right to penalize espionage attempting to pilfer said information. The motivations of the person who released the information, and the level of secrecy required to access the information, are irrelevant: the Army Private who passed on a bunch of “secret” security level documents (the lowest level of secrecy) to Assange is rightly awaiting a military trial, and will likely be staying at Hotel Quantico for a long, long time.

Unsurprisingly, Israel’s interests do not 100% align with ours: we should still maintain our alliance with them, but that means that we are not the same country and should not expect our interests or priorities to be theirs.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

I'll let the attempted bullying slide

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:42PM EDT (link)

1. Geopolitics is really hard.

2. There are a lot of Arabs out there and all demographic data indicates that they are out-producing Israelis. Barring divine intervention, Israel is going to be an Arab state in the next 50 years.

3. To paraphrase Lord Palmerston, “nations have no eternal friends only perpetual interests.”

4. We’re going to have to learn to live with jihad in one way shape or form. Whether it triumphs as the dominant strain or is relegated to the corners of the muslim world can be influenced.

5. Never, ever give me the “whose side are you on” bs again because I have no intention of putting up with it.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 
 
 

I am addressing Mr. Erickson

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:33AM EDT (link)

Please, Mr. Erickson, answer my questions.

 

I am addressing Mr. Erickson

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 11:33AM EDT (link)

Please, Mr. Erickson, answer my questions.

If you have a question for him...

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:18PM EDT (link)

consider calling into his radio show tonight.

wsbradio.com, 9-12 EST.

Most of the FP diarists (myself included) don’t have all the time in the world to engage in comment surfing on the diaries.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

I'll try to tune in.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:34PM EDT (link)

I am looking for the call-in number. I hope Mr. Erickson brings this topic up for discussion this evening. No doubt there are many who agree with him. The question is not, did Pollard commit criminal acts. The question is, was and is his punishment porportionate to similar crimial acts to his.

 

I'll try to tune in.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:34PM EDT (link)

I am looking for the call-in number. I hope Mr. Erickson brings this topic up for discussion this evening. No doubt there are many who agree with him. The question is not, did Pollard commit criminal acts. The question is, was and is his punishment porportionate to similar crimial acts to his.

You have yet to show

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:31PM EDT (link)

that it is disproportionate.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 

wsbradio.com

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:49PM EDT (link)

I have yet to find a call-in number for this Atlanta station. Additionally, the site says “the New Herman Cain Show is now on every weeknight 7 to 10.”

I don't think they've updated the schedule yet.

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:18PM EDT (link)

The Erick Erickson Show is right after Cain. Was 9-12 EST last night.

Callin number is (I believe) 888-WSB-TALK. Erick will give the number at the beginning of the broadcast.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 

wsbradio.com

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:49PM EDT (link)

I have yet to find a call-in number for this Atlanta station. Additionally, the site says “the New Herman Cain Show is now on every weeknight 7 to 10.”

 
 
 

Streiff, antipathy for Israel "can" be anti-Semitism

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:13PM EDT (link)

Anti-Zionism, I believe, is the new anti-Semitism. If you hold that Israel either has no right to exist or hasn’t the right to defend herself in the face of Islamic terror, why would it be wrong to conclude you are motivated by anti-Semitic or anti-Jewish feelings?

sure and antipathy for Obama can be racism

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 12:15PM EDT (link)

both had equal levels of intellectual rigor

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

Looks like what he stole was NOT 'harmless'...

Chuck From Dayton Wednesday, January 12th at 12:37PM EDT (link)

…and may indeed have fallen into hands beyond the Israelis.

Written about extensively in 1999…

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/576453/posts

Chuck,

Dayton OH

Chuck

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:47PM EDT (link)

If I find the time today, I will try to read far-left jounalist, Seymour Hersh’s piece on Pollard but I’ve got to say from the on-set, I do not trust Seymour Hersh, though I have read some of his material. He wrote extensively about former President Bush. When I read an author, a scholar or a journalist, integrity, credibity and honesty is upper-most in my mind. That is why, post 9/11, I have been especially careful who and what I read on Islam, Islamic law and history, the prophet Muhammad, and the jihad. There are many apologists out there. More than you might think. Streiff brought up the “dual loyalty” notion. There are many American Jews who are especially sensitive to this charge. I believe that is why so many American Jews and Jewish leaders are silent on Pollard. American Jews were likewise largely silent during the Holocaust.

 
 

Antipathy for Obama because of his race, IS racism

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:38PM EDT (link)

Antipathy for Obama’s radical policies is not racism.

 

Pollard should not

caboose Wednesday, January 12th at 12:49PM EDT (link)

be released under any circumstances. He is a convicted espionage traitor to this country. I was associated with (Knew) a military person who was set up by the OSI in a sting operation. The agents planted bogus or fake classified documents that he had access to. He took the bait and was charged, comvicted and was busted in rank all the way, lost his military retirement, and sentenced to 20 years of hard labor in levenworth. So if this treasonous Pollard is released, would it not be reasonable to pardon all of those who was convicted in the past and restore any benefits they earned prior to coviction. While I’m at it, would the convicted spys, the Walkers family, also be released from prison and pardoned, or is that just reserved for those who spy for israel. As for Israel, who are considered our friends, why would they a hire a traitorous thug like Pollard to spy on their friends. Friends???

 

I believe Shimon Peres was prime minister then.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:59PM EDT (link)

Peres also cooperated in the “arms to Iran in exchange for hostages” fiasco during the Reagan years. That was also profoundly immoral. I do not trust Peres to this day. Peres is largely responsible for the Oslo accords which resulted in thousand of dead and maimed. Leaders of nations do wrong. No nation is perfect, including the United States. Because a nation does wrong or engages in wrong behavior, does not make that nation an enemy as you seem to believe. Some might argue, America’s pursuit of a Muslim (no question, terror) state in Israel’s strategic hearland not at all freindly, given the fact that the Muslim-Arab world seeks Israel’s destruction. This person who was set up by the OSI in a sting operation, to what nation was he prepared to provide sensetive information? From what I have read, it is indeed relevant. If you and others believe Israel is an enemy state, I can understand why you think he should either be hung or rot in prison.

 

I believe Shimon Peres was prime minister then.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 12:59PM EDT (link)

Peres also cooperated in the “arms to Iran in exchange for hostages” fiasco during the Reagan years. That was also profoundly immoral. I do not trust Peres to this day. Peres is largely responsible for the Oslo accords which resulted in thousand of dead and maimed. Leaders of nations do wrong. No nation is perfect, including the United States. Because a nation does wrong or engages in wrong behavior, does not make that nation an enemy as you seem to believe. Some might argue, America’s pursuit of a Muslim (no question, terror) state in Israel’s strategic hearland not at all freindly, given the fact that the Muslim-Arab world seeks Israel’s destruction. This person who was set up by the OSI in a sting operation, to what nation was he prepared to provide sensetive information? From what I have read, it is indeed relevant. If you and others believe Israel is an enemy state, I can understand why you think he should either be hung or rot in prison.

 

How many times do we need to learn the same lesson?

cobra Wednesday, January 12th at 1:17PM EDT (link)

A Jew living in America is most likely, a Jew first, and, then, maybe, an American.
How many (painful) times do we need to learn this lesson?

This is a disgusting and anti-Semitic comment

Old_Dominion (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:20PM EDT (link)

It’s the tiresome dual loyalty canard that rears its head whenever bigots discuss Israel.

 

Many Christians in Germany were Germans first....

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 1:31PM EDT (link)

Before and during the second world war, Germans put Germany and its leader first. That is what Hitler and the Nazis appealed to; loyalty to Germany (the Fatherland) above and beyond all else. Shouldn’t a Christian be a Christian first? Had German Christian put God first, maybe there would have been no Hitler; no second world war wherein 50 million were killed. If being a Jew first means puting God first, is that wrong? In the Jewish Bible, the prophet Jeremiah, speaking for God, told the Jewish exiles to seek the peace of the nation to which they were exiled (then it was ancient Babylon) and the pray to YHWH for its welfare, etc. Should a believer put country first or God first?

 

Many Christians in Germany were Germans first....

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 1:31PM EDT (link)

Before and during the second world war, Germans put Germany and its leader first. That is what Hitler and the Nazis appealed to; loyalty to Germany (the Fatherland) above and beyond all else. Shouldn’t a Christian be a Christian first? Had German Christian put God first, maybe there would have been no Hitler; no second world war wherein 50 million were killed. If being a Jew first means puting God first, is that wrong? In the Jewish Bible, the prophet Jeremiah, speaking for God, told the Jewish exiles to seek the peace of the nation to which they were exiled (then it was ancient Babylon) and the pray to YHWH for its welfare, etc. Should a believer put country first or God first?

 

Yeah, maybe we should just round them up

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:33PM EDT (link)

and expunge them from the body politic.

I wonder if any other countries have tried that?

/sarc

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 

Thanks for this ironic post

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:18PM EDT (link)

Erick,

I am very encouraged to see you take a stand for a foreign policy that puts America first. It has been a good century since our federal government has had such a policy. The present-day Republican party as a whole has eschewed such a belief, and those within the party who still hold it are marginalized. If you decide to stick with this philosophy, expect opposition from the party.

I was surprised to see you take this stand, especially since, as you say, ” there are people who believe our alliance with Israel outweighs every other consideration.” One of those people is Marlin Stutzman, whom you endorsed for the Indiana senate over America-firster, John Hostettler. Stutzman’s campaign in that primary even sent out a last minute email smearing Hostettler for putting America’s interests before Israels. Another outspoken unabashed Israel-firster is Mike Pence, whom you recently endorsed for president. Pence has explicitly stated that the U.S. should adopt whatever policies the government of Israel tells us to.

links

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:21PM EDT (link)

cute assertions but, especially in the case of Pence, I think somewhat tendentious.

Want to give us the quotes w/sources or is that just too hard?

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

sure

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:28PM EDT (link)

Pence said that on an interview on CBN. I have seen the video, which I’ll link here. Unfortunately, it’s not viewable right now. I haven’t found a transcript of it yet. But he definitely said it, and he’s been vocally Israel-first his whole career. I’m sure if you asked him if he thinks that, he won’t be shy about saying he does.
http://blogs.cbn.com/beltwaybuzz/archive/2010/02/04/pence-on-the-promised-land.aspx

Quoting from the link you gave

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 1:38PM EDT (link)

“As far as he knows there is not a large Jewish population in his Indiana Congressional district. However, Rep. Mike Pence often rushes to the House floor to deliver speeches on Israel. He’s simply a Bible-believing Christian, he says, who loves the country….”

Maybe Mike Pence observes the First Commandment, “You shall have no other gods before me…” Maybe Pence puts God first. Perhaps Pence has read where God pledged, “I will bless those who bless you and the one who curses you, I will curse…. and to you and your descendants, I have given this land; all of the land of Canaan…” Maybe self-professed Christian Barack Hussein Obama does not put the God of Israel, the God of the Bible first.

I'm sure he has read that

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:42PM EDT (link)

But nowhere in the Bible does God say any such thing about the modern nation-state of Israel. That blessing was made to Abraham, not the Knesset.

Israel is Israel

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 2:30PM EDT (link)

True, the Bible says nothing about states but it does say much about “nations.” Israel has been and still is a nation before God. No? Abraham is the father of Isaac and the grandfather and Jacob – later named Israel. These are the Jewish patriarchs. God’s promises concerning the land of Israel were to Israel’s patriarchs and their descendants forever, and to those nations that bless Israel and that bless the God of Israel. I have made my position about devotion to state or country “first” clear elsewhere on this thread.

But that has nothing to do with the modern nation-state

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:30PM EDT (link)

Yes. Jacob was renamed “Israel.” But that was the ancient biblical nation of the 12 tribes of Israel. The modern nation-state has nothing whatsoever to do with that ancient nation. If you think being descended from those 12 tribes is what matters, then the average Arab probably has more claim to that than the average Jewish immigrant to Israel does.

Furthermore, even if the citizenry of that modern nation-state do somehow stand as present-day recipients of God’s covenant with Abraham (which I don’t think can be supported from Scripture), then that still doesn’t mean that the regime that now rules over them in Jerusalem must have some favored status, any more than it would have meant favored status for Ahab or Herod or any other ancient ruler of Israel.

 
 
 
 

Quoting from the link you gave

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 1:38PM EDT (link)

“As far as he knows there is not a large Jewish population in his Indiana Congressional district. However, Rep. Mike Pence often rushes to the House floor to deliver speeches on Israel. He’s simply a Bible-believing Christian, he says, who loves the country….”

Maybe Mike Pence observes the First Commandment, “You shall have no other gods before me…” Maybe Pence puts God first. Perhaps Pence has read where God pledged, “I will bless those who bless you and the one who curses you, I will curse…. and to you and your descendants, I have given this land; all of the land of Canaan…” Maybe self-professed Christian Barack Hussein Obama does not put the God of Israel, the God of the Bible first.

 
 
 

Great, another Ronulan

Old_Dominion (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:23PM EDT (link)

Let me guess, you backed Ron Paul for President. The antipathy toward Israel among the Ronulans is usually a dead giveaway.

Antipathy towards Israel?

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:32PM EDT (link)

So putting US interests before Israel’s is antipathy towards Israel?

Does that apply to other countries as well? Are we supposed to support policies that put the interests of France, Japan, or Iran before our own, lest we have antipathy towards them? Or is Israel the only foreign country we’re supposed to be subservient to like that? And is it really somehow anti-Israel for me to say that we shouldn’t have that kind of relationship with Israel, nor with any other foreign nation?

Look, if you want to send your money to the government of any foreign country for them to spend how they please, by all means do that. But leave the U.S. taxpayer out of it. Our money is not yours to spend.

What are America's interests?

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 1:41PM EDT (link)

In terms of national security and national defense (as is often invoked when it comes to Israel and the Middle East) how do America’s interests conflict with Israel’s interests? I ask both you, e_rowe and steiff who is also apparently anti-Israel.

the Iraq war

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:47PM EDT (link)

Clearly the conservative position was not to go to war against Iraq. Even those conservatives who were for that war at the time have generally come around to realize that they were wrong to compromise conservative principles to support it. Part of what drove that drift toward progressivism was the neoconservative movement (i.e. progressive Republicans like Bill Kristol). And clearly one, though not the only, factor was concern for the interests of Israel. So that’s one clear example where our government adopted a policy that was certainly not justifiable from a cost/benefit analysis with regard to our own interests, but where we did it anyway, partly because of Israel-firsters.

actually

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:49PM EDT (link)

the conservative position favored going to war against Iraq, it was only a small minority of paleocons who objected.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

paleo-con=conservative

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:55PM EDT (link)

I agree the conservatives were in the minority of the GOP. And we still are. But the policies of promoting democracy around the world, a la Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Truman, LBJ, Clinton, Bush, and Obama are not conservative. They’re the essence of progressivism.

paleocons aren't conservatives

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:02PM EDT (link)

they carry on the worst traditions of the John Birchers and Goldwater supporters in 1964 and the isolationists in the 1930s.

In your guts you know they’re nuts.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Terminology problem

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:12PM EDT (link)

I admit, the terms conservative and liberal can mean different things to different people. And if “conservative” means support for the status quo, which it can mean, then it’s true, the Republican establishment has been conservative in that sense since the early 20th century. They have opposed progressive intervention in the economy, the states, and the globe, when those interventions were novel things. But once those increases in federal government largess became the status quo, they supported them, and opposed any attempts either to roll them back or to add to them.

But if conservative means opposition to progressivism, and if what was the conservative position in the 30′s of opposing the New Deal, and supporting an America-first foreign policy of people like Senator Robert Taft are still what conservatism is, then it’s the paleo-cons who are the true conservatives.

I fail to see how neoconservatism can be called conservatism in any possible sense, other than the former sense of advocating the big government status quo.

stop the freakin threadjack

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:13PM EDT (link)

last warning

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

What is this?

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:17PM EDT (link)

Is the idea that you’re supposed to get the last word, and if I respond to what you actually say, then somehow I’m the one who’s threadjacking? How’s that work?

 
 
 
 
 

Also

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:00PM EDT (link)

Most of those Republicans who did support it at the time now know they were wrong.
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/gop-congressmen-most-republicans-now-think-iraq-war-was-a-mistake/
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2008/09/cheney-lied.html

They should have listened to what the far right-wing Republican, John Hostettler, said from the floor of the House, and kept their oath of office to uphold the Constitution, rather than breaking that oath by their votes in favor of a non-defensive war.
http://www.publiushouse.com/floorspeechtext.htm

relatedly

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:09PM EDT (link)

stop the threadjack.

We’re not going argue the nonexistent merits of Buchananite foreign policy. The thread is about Jonathan Pollard.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

You chose to argue it

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:15PM EDT (link)

And it’s not a threadjack. It was Erickson who observed, “I realize there are people who believe our alliance with Israel outweighs every other consideration.” I’m just saying that it’s nice to see him come out against that position.

Keep arguing

Neil Stevens (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:16PM EDT (link)

Keep arguing if you don’t like having a working account at RedState.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 

unclear on the concept

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 2:17PM EDT (link)

you’ve had two warnings to stop since then. I’d suggest you observe this one.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 

e_rowe

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 2:48PM EDT (link)

I do not believe any alliance between nations outweigh every other consideration. If it is just and right to keep Pollard languishing in prison so be it. If it is consistent with similar cases, fine. I’m not sure Pollard’s punishment is consistent with other similar cases. That is all I am saying.

 
 
 
 

Don't think that's quite accurate, streiff

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:14PM EDT (link)

Conservatives and fellow-travellers as varied as T Sowell, Bill Buckley, Walter Williams, and Milton Friedman opposed the war from the start, or very near the start. Russell Kirk and Barry Goldwater would also undoubtedly have been against the Iraq War, given that he was against the Gulf War. Many more conservatives renounced their previous positions in favor of the war, or in favor of continuing occupation.

Conservative foreign policy is rather devoid of hard and fast first principles that make it easier to tell a conservative from a non-conservative on issues such as fiscal conservatism or even social conservatism, and it is thus difficult to say that the conservative position must support some policy or other or any principle beyond a staunch commitment to defending US interests.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 

The problem was President Bush's justifications.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 2:09PM EDT (link)

Bush was less than honest about who was behind the 9/11 atrocities; the Saudis. Bush covered for his and his father’s Saudi friends who were up to their necks (still are) supporting Al Qaeda, the global jihad and the spread of Wahhabi Islam all over the world, throughout Europe and the United States. Saddam Hussein was a bad guy. Iraq supported terrorism but Bush did not make the case that Iraq was strongly implicated in the 9/11 attacks. Osama bin Laden had little use for the secular Saddam Hussein. The war in Iraq diverted precious resources and attention from destroying Al Qaeda and / or capturing bin Laden who was behind the September attacks.

 

The problem was President Bush's justifications.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 2:09PM EDT (link)

Bush was less than honest about who was behind the 9/11 atrocities; the Saudis. Bush covered for his and his father’s Saudi friends who were up to their necks (still are) supporting Al Qaeda, the global jihad and the spread of Wahhabi Islam all over the world, throughout Europe and the United States. Saddam Hussein was a bad guy. Iraq supported terrorism but Bush did not make the case that Iraq was strongly implicated in the 9/11 attacks. Osama bin Laden had little use for the secular Saddam Hussein. The war in Iraq diverted precious resources and attention from destroying Al Qaeda and / or capturing bin Laden who was behind the September attacks.

 

I'm not sure if this is a response to my question.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 2:21PM EDT (link)

From the Forward, published January 12, 2007, By Yossi Alpher

“….sometime prior to March 2003, Sharon told Bush privately in no uncertain terms what he thought about the Iraq plan. Sharon’s words — revealed here for the first time — constituted a friendly but pointed warning to Bush. Sharon acknowledged that Saddam Hussein was an “acute threat” to the Middle East and that he believed Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction.

Yet according to one knowledgeable source, Sharon nevertheless advised Bush not to occupy Iraq. According to another source — Danny Ayalon, who was Israel’s ambassador to the United States at the time of the Iraq invasion, and who sat in on the Bush-Sharon meetings — Sharon told Bush that Israel would not “push one way or another” regarding the Iraq scheme.

According to both sources, Sharon warned Bush that if he insisted on occupying Iraq, he should at least abandon his plan to implant democracy in this part of the world. “In terms of culture and tradition, the Arab world is not built for democratization,” Ayalon recalls Sharon advising….”

 

I'm not sure if this is a response to my question.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 2:21PM EDT (link)

From the Forward, published January 12, 2007, By Yossi Alpher

“….sometime prior to March 2003, Sharon told Bush privately in no uncertain terms what he thought about the Iraq plan. Sharon’s words — revealed here for the first time — constituted a friendly but pointed warning to Bush. Sharon acknowledged that Saddam Hussein was an “acute threat” to the Middle East and that he believed Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction.

Yet according to one knowledgeable source, Sharon nevertheless advised Bush not to occupy Iraq. According to another source — Danny Ayalon, who was Israel’s ambassador to the United States at the time of the Iraq invasion, and who sat in on the Bush-Sharon meetings — Sharon told Bush that Israel would not “push one way or another” regarding the Iraq scheme.

According to both sources, Sharon warned Bush that if he insisted on occupying Iraq, he should at least abandon his plan to implant democracy in this part of the world. “In terms of culture and tradition, the Arab world is not built for democratization,” Ayalon recalls Sharon advising….”

 

Bill Kristol

jamesmackey Thursday, January 13th at 5:23PM EDT (link)

You are so right about him. Here’s what he wrote during the 2004 campaign

“I will take Bush over Kerry, but Kerry over Buchanan or any of the lesser Buchananites on the right. If you read the last few issues of The Weekly Standard, it has as much or more in common with the liberal hawks than with traditional conservatives.”

He sounds more like Joe Lieberman than a conservative

http://americasfuture.org/doublethink/2004/08/exit-neocons-stage-left/

 
 

Also, foreign aid

e_rowe (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:53PM EDT (link)

The federal government should not be giving any foreign aid to anyone at all. Mike Pence last summer came out swinging against “bailing out” foreign countries, such as Greece. But shortly after doing that, he voted for another round of bailouts for Israel.

Like I told the other guy, if you want to send your own money to some foreign government for them to spend how they want (such as for taxpayer funded abortions, which is one of many unchristian things the government of Israel spends its money on), then by all means do it, it’s your money. If you think that that’s what God meant when he told Abraham “I will bless those who bless you,” then more power to you. But I can’t possibly see how you can defend bringing other taxpayers into that with our own federal government as the middle man.

 
 

What are America's interests?

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 1:41PM EDT (link)

In terms of national security and national defense (as is often invoked when it comes to Israel and the Middle East) how do America’s interests conflict with Israel’s interests? I ask both you, e_rowe and steiff who is also apparently anti-Israel.

 
 

Bingo.

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:34PM EDT (link)

nt

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 

Pollard deserves capital punihsment

Old_Dominion (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 1:25PM EDT (link)

I don’t care how friendly the recipient of your treachery is, treason is treason.

And while I’m firmly pro-Israel, Pollard’s release is a bridge too far.

I understand you don't care

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 1:57PM EDT (link)

The question is this. Have other people that have committed similar crimes, under similar circumstances, as Pollard has, have they gotten similar punishment? If people who have committed similar treason to Pollard been released from prison earlier, was there this outcry like what we are seeing here on this site? If not why not? Why does Pollard generate so much emotion? You say you are “firmly pro-Israel.” What does it mean to be firmly pro-Israel in your case?

It means that Old Dominion

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:33PM EDT (link)

is a Jew who strongly supports Israel, as the vast majority of RSers do. This conversation would be a lot more productive if you didn’t question the anti-Semitism or anti-Zionism of fellow conservatives.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

Strongly support

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 4:28PM EDT (link)

I don’t know what that means. That is why I asked him. What does it mean to support Israel? If you are a supporter of this sham of a “peace” process (as former President G. W. Bush did; as the GOP does) whereby Israel is rendered defenseless in the face of the jihad, is that strong support for Israel. I would like to see Israel wean herself from US aid and dependency. That being the case, what does strong support for Israel mean in light of Obama’s anti-Israel, pro- Islamic jihad policies against the Jewish state? I see no distinction between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. Zionism is basically the view that Israel is the Jewish people’s national homeland. That’s it. Anti-Zionists like Iranian President Ahmadinejad and others hold that Israel is an illegitimate state; an illegal occupier of Muslim land.

Red State

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 4:43PM EDT (link)

I wrote: “Anti-Zionists like Iranian President Ahmadinejad and others hold that Israel is an illegitimate state; an illegal occupier of Muslim land.”

I’ve not been following Erick Erickson closely on foreign policy / national security. He mostly writes about prudent economic policy and fiscal conservatism, which I strongly support. There is however, this dangerous strain in the tea party movement – this anti-Israel / Ron Paul strain – that is troubling. Dr. Paul has in the past taken the side of Hamas and Hezbollah jihadists against Israel’s right to self defense.

When I read this piece this morning and some / several of the comments, I am beginning to worry abouit Red State and Mr. Erickson.

 
 
 
 
 

Erickson's worst post ever

zeevjabotinsky Wednesday, January 12th at 3:20PM EDT (link)

Erickson –

You are incorrect.

>>
Jonathan Pollard was a spy for hire who was hired by Israel, South Africa, and potentially other countries. He ratted out our intelligence and potentially cost people their lives because of it.
<>
There are few conservatives within the actual conservative movement who are paying attention, but the bulk of those who are do not want Pollard released. They want him hanged or shot as a traitor to his country.
<<

Non-sense. Every conservative I know that knows the case wants the guy out. Where is your polling data?

The debate is moot now. He should be released as he served more than all other cold war era spies who were worse and whose actions resulted in deaths.

www.jihadwatch.org
www.israelnn.com

bzzzzt. Wrong answer

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:25PM EDT (link)

John Walker and his accomplice are still in prison.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Again streiff

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 3:45PM EDT (link)

Over the past several decades, the Soviet Union (now Russia) has been the biggest financier, backer, arms provider, etc. to Mideast nations that support international terrorism, including Syria and Iran. Russia is right now helping Iran (one of the regions largest state sponsors of international terrorism) become a nuclear power. Iran has threatened to wipe a neighboring nation-state off the map. Because of this progression, one day in the future we could conceivably see a nuclear device detonated in an American or a European city. Today there are jihad terror cells in American cities. Nonetheless, you believe Israel is equally or nearly equally evil. If not, why bring up John Walker who spied for the Soviet Union?

Who said Israel is evil?

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 4:15PM EDT (link)

I imagine that streiff would hold the same position if Pollard passed on information to the Brits, instead.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 

Again streiff

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 3:45PM EDT (link)

Over the past several decades, the Soviet Union (now Russia) has been the biggest financier, backer, arms provider, etc. to Mideast nations that support international terrorism, including Syria and Iran. Russia is right now helping Iran (one of the regions largest state sponsors of international terrorism) become a nuclear power. Iran has threatened to wipe a neighboring nation-state off the map. Because of this progression, one day in the future we could conceivably see a nuclear device detonated in an American or a European city. Today there are jihad terror cells in American cities. Nonetheless, you believe Israel is equally or nearly equally evil. If not, why bring up John Walker who spied for the Soviet Union?

 
 
 

Potentially cost lives???!!!

zeevjabotinsky Wednesday, January 12th at 3:23PM EDT (link)

Erickson – Are we now down to CNN/Democrats levels where we can level such baseless accusations?

The guy wasn’t recruited, he volunteered to give info to Israel about Arab army movements. No US lives were lost. Erickson caught some left wing delusional virus in CNN news rooms.

www.jihadwatch.org
www.israelnn.com

funny

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:26PM EDT (link)

that’s not what he pleaded guilty to.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

This diary has resulted in a ton of comments. and

runner12 (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:29PM EDT (link)

I must admit I am feeling a bit ignorant because I have no idea who this guy is. I consider myself to be fairly well-informed. Could someone help me with the details?

When did this guy get thrown in jail? What years did he spy? Could someone provide some background please?

Runner12, Jonathan Pollard

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 3:38PM EDT (link)

was an American citizen who sold US secrets that he was made privy to while in the CIA to Israel, S Africa, and Pakistan. He pled guilty to espionage at his trial, and it has become a cause celebre among some conservatives to try to free him due to his connection to Israel (he is Jewish and was supposedly motivated to pass along secrets to Israel as a result of his Jewish identity).

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

Pollard

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 4:05PM EDT (link)

“Jonathan Jay Pollard is a former civilian intelligence analyst who was convicted of spying for Israel.”

 

I looked it up and read a little about the case.

runner12 (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:59PM EDT (link)

He was convicted when I was a little tyke which makes me feel less ignorant than I did initially.
It seems to me that if he spied against the US and broke the law doesn’t he belong in jail? There must have been some solid evidence against him or he wouldn’t have been convicted. I am definitely pro-Israel and can’t stand this Adminstration’s weak support of our ally. But if someone breaks the law, don’t they have to serve out their sentence? We can’t bend the law based on someone’s ethnicity, that would be dishonest.

It may somewhat of a naive view not being familiar with the case, but it makes sense to me.

 

I looked it up and read a little about the case.

runner12 (Diary) Wednesday, January 12th at 11:59PM EDT (link)

He was convicted when I was a little tyke which makes me feel less ignorant than I did initially.
It seems to me that if he spied against the US and broke the law doesn’t he belong in jail? There must have been some solid evidence against him or he wouldn’t have been convicted. I am definitely pro-Israel and can’t stand this Adminstration’s weak support of our ally. But if someone breaks the law, don’t they have to serve out their sentence? We can’t bend the law based on someone’s ethnicity, that would be dishonest.

It may somewhat of a naive view not being familiar with the case, but it makes sense to me.

 
 
 

A question for the Pollard advocates -- would a nuclear Pearl Harbor be forgivable?

Hancock Wednesday, January 12th at 4:04PM EDT (link)

Carefully consider your answer.

Among the information passed by Pollard to the Israelis was the SIOP — America’s nuclear war fighting plan.

This was during one of the most tense periods of the Cold War. It was not foreordained the USSR would go down peaceably as it ultimately did. If the Israelis passed, traded or sold this information to the USSR or any Soviet aligned or friendly country, the consequences could literally have been the termination of our nation, and hundreds of millions dead.

Irrespective of any other consideration, knowing this one fact, how could anyone advocate anything other than immediate death to Pollard? No American ever, from Benedict Arnold to Julius Rosenberg to the Walker Ring has ever put information of this level of danger out to anyone outside of our country.

I just do not see how any of you could argue for any mercy for him at all, and consider yourself an American patriot or profess any love for your country.

Pollard made available to at least one foreign government the information necessary to destroy us all.

Single Integrated Operational Plan

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 4:16PM EDT (link)

On what credible site can we read this charge? Were your allegation true, what has Israel done to indicate to you that she would sell security secrets to a mortal enemy of the United States and Israel; secrets which could devastate US cities?

 

Single Integrated Operational Plan

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 4:16PM EDT (link)

On what credible site can we read this charge? Were your allegation true, what has Israel done to indicate to you that she would sell security secrets to a mortal enemy of the United States and Israel; secrets which could devastate US cities?

 
 

SIOP -- The New Yorker, 1999

Hancock Wednesday, January 12th at 4:54PM EDT (link)

Here is a quote from the article on the web. I was involved in the late 1990s -2001 at the House Committee on Government Overisght. There was a major effort underway to get Clinton to pardon Pollard. I was tasked along with other staff to do some research on the facts of the matter for background, as there was some thought that we may have to do public hearings/oversight on some of the more outrageous Clinton pardons, such as Marc Rich. Clinton never did grant a pardon to Pollard despite the lobbying and PR effort to get him to do so. Clearly, there was a reason for that, and it had to due with the heinous nature of his crimes.

Advocates for Pollard like to point out how his sentence was so incredibly harsh, compared to what they thought he should get for ‘passing secrets among friends’. He did much more than that. Why do you think he got such a stiff sentence in the first place? And has every President who has been asked to pardon him since refused to do so because they were all anti-Semites or anti-Zionists? Of course not. It is because of the unforgivable nature of his crimes.

“High-level suspicions about Israeli-Soviet collusion were expressed as early as December, 1985, a month after Pollard’s arrest, when William J. Casey, the late C.I.A. director, who was known for his close ties to the Israeli leadership, stunned one of his station chiefs by suddenly complaining about the Israelis breaking the “ground rules.” The issue arose when Casey urged increased monitoring of the Israelis during an otherwise routine visit, I was told by the station chief, who is now retired. “He asked if I knew anything about the Pollard case,” the station chief recalled, and he said that Casey had added, “For your information, the Israelis used Pollard to obtain our attack plan against the U.S.S.R. all of it. The coordinates, the firing locations, the sequences. And for guess who? The Soviets.” (boldface mine – Ronin)Casey had then explained that the Israelis had traded the Pollard data for Soviet emigres. “How’s that for cheating?” he had asked.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/576453/posts

Seymour Hersh

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 5:18PM EDT (link)

I wrote above, I do not trust Hersh. He is a notorious leftist Israel-basher. I did a quick Google search and found the following from Morton Klein on Seymour Hersh. Both Klein and Hersh are Jewish:

Seymour Hersh’s Disinformation Campaign
Morton Klein, National President, Zionist Organization of America
The Jewish Press, January 29, 1999

In a widely publicized article in a recent issue of THE NEW YORKER, journalist Seymour Hersh claimed Jonathan Pollard should stay behind bars because – according to Hersh – some of the data Pollard gave Israel was then forwarded by the Israelis to the Soviet Union.

But Hersh neglected to inform his reading public of a crucial point – he made the same allegations back in 1991, and they were based on a source that turned out to be, in the words of THE JERUSALEM POST, “a notorious, chronic liar.” In other words, Hersh is just recycling information from a discredited source in order to harm Pollard. Perhaps that is not surprising, considering Hersh’s long record of extreme anti-Israel bias.

In 1982, for example, he gave a speech at Hiram College in which he “compared Israeli attitudes toward the Palestinians to American views toward the Vietnamese and the Nazis’ policy toward Jews. (according to NEAR EAST REPORT)

The fact that Hersh has stooped to recycling allegations that were discredited eight years ago is an indication of the weakness of the case made by Pollard’s enemies. No reasonable case can be made to keep Pollard in jail any longer. Pollard is the victim of an outrageous double standard, in which he has been punished far more severely for spying for an ally of America than the punishments given out to those who have spied for nations that are not friendly to the United States. The time has come for President Clinton to grant clemency to Jonathan Pollard.

http://www.jonathanpollard.org/1999/012999.htm

 
 

Hersh

Hancock Wednesday, January 12th at 5:32PM EDT (link)

Hersh certainly has his enemies. He also has a Pulitzer Prize for reporting. His story was published by a reputable, if obnoxiously liberal for my tastes, magazine, the New Yorker. I would imagine if the article were demonstrably untrue, the editors or lawyers of the New Yorker would have prevented its publication, or had to publish corrections if warranted. I am not aware of either of these things happening.

I don’t know Hersh personally and cant speak to whether what you say of him is true or not. I know he has written some things over the years that made my blood boil, and made the U.S. and some of the U.S. leaders I have strongly supported look very bad. Such is what you get when a journalist decides to write — you may like the outcome, you may not.

I do know my personal experiences and work I did on this issue years ago. It is not published, by I remember very well what kind of scum Pollard is, and what he did. As I said, there is a reason he is behind bars for life. I would prefer if he were dead, but that is not my call.

I am sorry but we simply disagree on this, and respectfully, no amount of argument is goiong to change my mind. It is clear that you feel passionately otherwise, and I respect your right to hold your opinions, though I am saddened that you would waste what seems to be your considerable knowledge and abilities advocating on behalf of such an individual.

 

Maybe you are right.

steve53 Wednesday, January 12th at 6:06PM EDT (link)

I think what Pollard did was very wrong. Because American Jews support Israel, in and of itself, that does not make Jews disloyal American citizens. Pollard was indeed a disloyal American citizen and he is a Jew. That is why what he did is so bad. I’m not sure how much damage he did to American security but I know he hurt every American Jew because of his treason. That having been said, I’ve been reading for years, people saying he got a disproportionate sentence. I’ve not really entered the fray. Though I consider Prime Minister Netanyahu a weak leader, I believe he has been a staunch supporter and defender of America. Netanyahu is a strong believer in the goodness and the greatness of the American people. I do not believe he would ask the president of the United States to commute Pollard’s sentence if he believed Pollard is a scum. Maybe I am wrong.

This is a good note to conclude on.

Hancock Wednesday, January 12th at 6:15PM EDT (link)

Steve, I agree with virutally everything you said in your post, other than I disagree with those who think the sentence is lenient. You are right that Pollard’s actions have opened up American Jewry to attacks from those who would be attacking Jews regardless and find Pollard a convenient cudgel to use. I agree that Netanyahu has generaly been a staunch supporter of America throughout his career. I am not sure why he asked for leniency for Pollard, perhaps it was due to some domestic political considerations.

 
 

Pollard

1stsgt Wednesday, January 12th at 9:00PM EDT (link)

If he was convicted as a spy against his own country, then I say HANG HIM HIGH.

 

From Wikipedia...

haumea (Diary) Thursday, January 13th at 3:20AM EDT (link)

“At the time of Pollard’s sentencing there was a rule that mandated parole at thirty years for prisoners like him if they had maintained a clean record in prison. That parole date would be November 21, 2015. Also, Pollard was eligible to apply for parole after eight years and six months, though he has never done so.[35]”

Is this correct? So are we talking about 4 years?

yes.

gekster (Diary) Thursday, January 13th at 3:24AM EDT (link)

I saw the same thing.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

OK, I get it...

haumea (Diary) Thursday, January 13th at 12:39PM EDT (link)

As he’s served nearly 90% of his sentence, one must conclude that this is a political football for both sides of the issue. His release isn’t going to compromise US security, as some say, nor is his staying in prison going to substantially affect him, given how much time he has already served.

So the passion on this issue is all out of proportion with reality.

 
 
 

Just say "no" to traitors

colonelfannin Thursday, January 13th at 9:16AM EDT (link)

Jonothan Pollard did irreparable damage to American national security but even more damage to Israel’s national security. Running an American government employee as an agent to obtain US secrets was a terrible betrayal of our relationship and our support. As a direct result of the Pollard operation the critical US-Israeli intelligence relationship was strained and friendships and longstanding professional cooperation, vital to Israel’s security was chilled.

I know of no one angrier about Pollard than senior Jewish American intelligence officers who strongly reject the argument, often propounded by short sighted and tone deaf Pollard and Israel supporters, that what Pollard did was justified and appropriate because he did so in support of Israel. Treason is never appropriate and those who call for Pollard’s release compound the harm already done by him to the critical US -Israeli security relationship – a relationship that is too important to squander with calls for the release of a traitor who harmed Israel and America for a pay check. And if Israeli intelligence were truly very good they would know this.