« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Media Matters Helps Prove the CDC Did Cover Up Abortion Data

It was certainly not intentional, but the leftwing interest group Media Matters for America has uncovered an internal memo from the CDC proving the CDC did in fact cover up and suppress abortion data until RedState revealed the coverup.

On Thursday, I reported that the Centers for Disease Control was covering up abortion data. Each year since 1969, the Centers for Disease Control has published its “Abortion Surveillance System” the week after Thanksgiving in its professional journal, The Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (“MMWR”).

Two weeks ago, RedState contacted the CDC to inquire if and when the data would be released. We were told by their press office — direct quotes — that the CDC “will not have stats available at any time in the near future” and there “are no plans for them to come out any time soon.”

On Friday, the CDC reversed its position and claimed that the data would come out in February. Later that day the CDC said the data would be out February 25th.

Now Media Matters has released a memo that gives away the game. And it may be time for a congressional hearing into what happened.
Let us just be clear about the CDC’s last minute story to us. The hold up, according to the CDC, was its need to get population data. This ignores the fact that the CDC’s 2010 report will use data from 2007, including population data from 2007, readily available to anyone with an internet connection since . . . well . . . 2007, courtesy of the Census Bureau — another organization that, like the CDC, just so happens to be part of something called the federal government.

In other words, two weeks ago the CDC said it “will not have stats available at any time in the near future” and there “are no plans for them to come out any time soon.” Last week, after we documented this, the CDC reversed and said “the population data needed to develop rate/ratio statistics was not available at the time we normally prepare the ASR” and the CDC would release it “tentatively” in February. The CDC also noted the MMWR’s editorial calendar is booked ‘well in advance.’

Today, our “friends” at Media Matters confirm for us the CDC did cover up the abortion data and try to avoid publishing it. Media Matters obtained an internal CDC memo showing “that the report was submitted for review and editing on November 12.”

That would be exactly when one would expect the report to go for editing with a publication date the week after Thanskgiving.

Again, the CDC first told us that it had no plans of releasing the report. Then the CDC told us it was awaiting data. Thanks to Media Matters, we now know the report was actually done and submitted on November 12, 2010, completely contrary to everything the CDC has said both to RedState and publicly in response to our story.

What this means is that someone at the CDC received the report to review and edit, and caused it not to be released on its usual schedule, with no publicly stated reason why and no apparent interest in releasing it until we publicized the issue. The question that now needs to be answered – perhaps ultimately to Congress – is who made that decision, who told them to make that decision, and why. With Media Matters’ help, Congress will now know where to start asking those questions.

COMMENTS

  • davesinsanantonio

    do its job. They must fix this country in accordance with the will of We the People. We will not tolerate anything less!

  • ohiohistorian

    We all know that they could have just not gotten it done. OOPS happens. Thanksgiving came up unexpectedly. Washington was too hot, so the people couldn’t work efficiently. Global warming happens, after all.

    Agreed that they told a couple whoppers to cover it up, but that could be to protect some GS-12′s derriere, not necessarily a sinister reason.

    We all know that under Obama that abortion is becoming safe and rare. So why worry about a report?

  • ss396

    According to Mr. Erickson, the report has been produced regularly for 40+ years without apparent hitch. It is certainly on somebody’s ‘to do’ list around there.

    Businesses are subject to all manner of annual reporting. If they miss the report, they get fined. Heavily. If they are big enough, they get blasted in the press. Heavily. Depending on which report they overlooked, there might even be jail time involved. They don’t get an “OOPS”.

  • tojoma

    watching the back and forths that occur between Media Matters and Eric. They sure do pay a lot of attention to him. This is one of the best “uncoverups” I’ve seen in a long time. Good job Eric.

  • HSMom

    I find that it conveniently comes out after the elections too. To whom would that benefit?

    Bet the numbers aren’t good. That will look bad for the president who is “open” to other ideas other than abortion, as he said before he was elected.

  • josephmn

    nt

  • cosmos110

    I’m disappointed that Red State is running advertisements of Newt Gingrich. This man will likely be running in 2012 unless enough people get this memo. Look at his voting record.

  • cam1

    are obviously bad for the administration and BHO. This is a wonderful time for Congress to pull the CDC in front of cameras to spread the word.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …that’s an impressive own-goal. Don’t they have anybody over there who’s familiar with publication schedules? Or who can read?

  • Bill S
  • nhbuckeye

    exactly right.

  • alecat

    Every part of the gov that uses taxpayer $ is responsible to show where the $ is spent. Withholding a report means withdrawal of funding. Hold their feet to the fire of accountability or they are history! CDC is no different. Until they get it right every minute of every day can be spent with congressional hearings. The expected defunding that will result will more than pay for those hearings.

  • melatr7

    It’s RIDICULOUS that, in this day and age, we have to put up with getting reports that are three years old and do not reflect current trends. How the heck is a society supposed to respond to that? Not to mention that it gives a government agency three years to distort the facts.

    The data they are ‘set’ to release is reflective of a time when abstinence was being more widely recommended- prior to ‘condoms101′ for 3rd graders.

    Just think about where we would be if this were true about budget reports.

  • uselogic

    Loved reading the pinheads’ comments below their article. They made laugh. “Oooh…Erick was wrong; it’s not always released in Nov or Dec.” Yeah, ya doofballs…..sometimes it was released even earlier.

  • uselogic

    Loved reading the pinheads’ comments below their article. They made laugh. “Oooh…Erick was wrong; it’s not always released in Nov or Dec.” Yeah, ya doofballs…..sometimes it was released even earlier.

  • uselogic

    above.

  • uselogic

    above.

  • skorrent1

    They’ve recently begun an investigation to determine how many illnesses can be ascribed to global warming/climate change/climate disruption/heavy snowstorms/whatever.

    A couple years ago I searched the CDC files online for info on homosexual links to AIDS, Gay Bowell Syndrome, life expectancy, disease frequency and suchlike. Nada, zilch, zero! Too un-PC!!

  • talgus

    Congress should fine the CDC 5% of their current budget for this OOPS. (not prorated, so really 10% until Oct 2011)
    Maybe then the bureaucracy (and the appointees that are running the show) will learn.

  • Read Chesterton

    as it’s left wing livestock involved.

  • WarEagle01

    with this. I mean normally they’re working against us. Thanks George Soros! /sn Geez, no wonder these people are losing so badly.

  • WarEagle01

    with this. I mean normally they’re working against us. Thanks George Soros! /sn Geez, no wonder these people are losing so badly.